Flying Saucer Review - No 03 - 1952 03 04

Magazine Overview

Title: FLYING SAUCER REVIEW
Issue: #3
Date: March-April 1952
Publisher: E. Rockmore

This issue of the "Flying Saucer Review" is dedicated to compiling and analyzing reports of unidentified aerial phenomena, primarily focusing on sightings that occurred in late 1951. The publication is structured into four sections: a "Rewrite Section" to present the basic facts of each report, an "Analysis Section" to evaluate their authenticity and identify patterns, a "Credit Section" to acknowledge contributors, and a planned "Historical Supplement" for future issues.

Content Summary

The core of this issue is the "Rewrite Section," which meticulously lists 84 distinct sightings, numbered sequentially. These reports detail observations of various aerial objects, predominantly described as fiery, ball-like, or luminous, often with accompanying trails of smoke, light, or color. The sightings span numerous locations across the United States, with specific dates, times, latitudes, and longitudes provided where available. Many entries also include the source of the report, typically local newspapers or journals.

Key Observations and Details from Sightings:

• Object Descriptions: Common descriptions include "fiery, ball-like object," "silvery ball-like object," "bright green object," "luminous object," "tear-shaped object," "disc-like object," and occasionally "airplane-like" objects.
• Colors: Reported colors range from silvery, red, blue, green, and orange to whitish-blue and purplish red.
• Behavior: Objects are described as crossing the sky at high speeds, falling toward Earth, exploding, bursting, crashing, vanishing, appearing to strike the ground, spinning, flashing, banking, and climbing vertically.
• Associated Phenomena: Many sightings are accompanied by descriptions of phenomena such as loud concussive sounds, heavy radio interference, vapor trails, smoke, burning grass, and bright flashes of light.
• Altitude and Size: Estimates for altitude vary widely, from 75 feet to 20,000 feet, with some objects described as being the size of a football or having a diameter of 20 feet.
• Geographic Distribution: The majority of sightings are concentrated in the United States, with specific reports from states including North Carolina, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Washington D.C., New York, Arizona, New Mexico, California, Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Florida, Michigan, Indiana, and Connecticut. International reports include sightings from Peru, Mexico, and Puerto Rico.

Specific Incident Examples:

• On October 12, 1951, a large, silvery ball-like object was observed over Salisbury, North Carolina.
• On October 14, 1951, near Vandegrift and Rollo, Pennsylvania, a fiery object appeared to fall, and later a separate unknown object shattered a car window.
• On November 2, 1951, a brilliant green, fiery, ball-like object was sighted east of Lordsburg, New Mexico, initiating a series of similar sightings across the Southwest.
• On November 16, 1951, in Sonoma, California, an object with an orange trail raced across the sky, followed by a white flash and evidence of burning vegetation.
• On November 19, 1951, a circular disc-like object resembling a turtle shell was photographed in Riverside, California.
• On December 13, 1951, a small fiery object streaked across the sky near Tucumcari, New Mexico, and was associated with a loud roaring sound and the breaking of a water tank, resulting in four fatalities.

Addenda Reports:

An "Addenda Reports" section is included to list sightings that lack sufficient detail (like exact date or place) or that were reported directly by observers without newspaper verification. These are kept separate from the main reports due to potential issues with vouching for the observer or the completeness of the information.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the consistent reporting of aerial phenomena that defy conventional explanation, the variety in object descriptions and behaviors, and the geographical spread of these sightings. The editorial stance, as indicated by the structure and the inclusion of an "Analysis Section," is one of serious investigation and attempted scientific evaluation of these reports, moving beyond mere sensationalism to gather and analyze factual data. The publication acknowledges the importance of source verification, as evidenced by the separation of newspaper-sourced reports from direct observer accounts in the addenda section.

Title: ANALYSIS OF SAUCER REPORTS
Issue: #3
Volume: AS
Date: November 1 to December 30, 1951
Publisher: E.Rockmore
Country: USA
Language: English

This issue of "Analysis of Saucer Reports" presents a compilation and analysis of reports numbered 43 through 84, covering the period from November 1 to December 30, 1951. The publication uses a working theory that these phenomena are caused by extra-terrestrial life forms, a conclusion drawn from a study of various books and journals on the subject, including the works of Charles Fort. The analysis acknowledges that while this theory is being used, the subject remains open to other explanations due to insufficient definitive information.

General Analysis of Single Reports

The issue meticulously details numerous individual reports, categorizing them and providing brief analyses. Many reports are described as "Possibly a saucer" or "Probably allied to the saucers," indicating a degree of uncertainty but leaning towards an unusual origin.

Key types of phenomena discussed include:

• Saucers: Reports #43 (Salisbury, N.C.) describe objects with speeds greater than balloons and movements against winds, making balloon theories doubtful. Report #45 (Thidhey, Vash) lacks sufficient information but describes a small, bright, circular object. Report #68 (Syracuse, N.Y.) notes noiselessness, ruling out jet theories. Report #72 (Grand Rapids, Mich.) mentions pilots seeing something different from known aircraft.
• Green Fireballs: A significant portion of the reports focus on green fireballs, often described as allied to saucers. Reports #44 (Virginia to Ohio) highlight unusual characteristics, including being the sixth giant meteor in a year and occurring outside a meteor shower period, with associated incidents of objects striking personal property. Reports #47, #48, #49, and #50 detail green fireballs in the Southwest U.S.A., with #49 being the most impressive and initiating discussion. Reports #51, #52, #55, #58, #59, #60, #66, #69, and #70 continue the listing of green fireballs across various locations like Texas, Arkansas, New Mexico, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, New York, and California. The analysis notes the unprecedented frequency of these fireballs and the lack of fragments, questioning their meteoric origin.
• Falling Airplanes: Several reports describe objects referred to as "falling airplanes." Report #46 (Far Rockaway, N.Y.) notes this is the fourth such report in 1951. Report #56 (Tucson, Arizona) questions whether these are meteors or pieces of them, noting the absence of fiery trails typical of meteors and that the objects are not self-luminous.
• Other Objects: Report #73-74 (Piscobama, Peru) describes a possible saucer or saucer spacestation, noting a long observation period of at least two days, which rules out known airplanes, balloons, and meteor theories. Report #80 (Yuma, Ariz.) discusses a 'foo fighter' possibly being a saucer, noting its rarity and apparent size.

Analysis of Theories

The publication delves into potential origins for these phenomena, primarily focusing on the "General Analysis of Green Fireball Reports." Two main categories are proposed:

1. Terrestrial Origin:
* New US rocket missiles: This theory is considered doubtful. Reasons include the current inefficiency of automatic direction controls for launching over populated areas, the difficulty of obtaining permission to fire missiles over other countries, security risks associated with night flights, the scattered nature of reports suggesting no single launching field, and the limited production and high cost of current rockets like the Martin Viking. The color of rocket exhaust flames is also noted as typically orange-red to bright red or blue-white, with green exhaust being unknown.
* New weather phenomenon caused by atomic explosions: This theory is mentioned but not elaborated upon in the provided text.

2. Extra-terrestial Origin:
* Unusually heavy meteoric shower: This is considered a possibility, especially given the frequency of reported fireballs.
* A periodic yearly saucer activity date: This suggests a cyclical nature to sightings.
* Flying saucers, or a new saucer type or aerial object: This aligns with the primary working theory of the publication.

Historical Listing of Green Saucers and Green Fireballs (1946-1951)

To provide context, the issue includes a historical listing of green saucers and green fireballs from 1946 to 1951. This section details numerous sightings with dates, locations, descriptions, and sources. Examples include:

• August 13, 1946 (Sweden): Torpedo-shaped object with tapered tail, emitting green and blue smoke, and a series of fireballs.
• September 15, 1946 (Portugal): Bluish ball of light moved in the sky for 5 minutes.
• December 8, 1947 (Las Vegas, Nevada): Bright green, small light rose into the sky at tremendous speed.
• December 30, 1947 (Walla Walla, Washington): Very brilliant, blue-green ball of fire rose from earth past an airliner at 13,000 feet.
• March 13, 1950 (Salt Lake City, Utah): Brilliant blue-green object with rounded edges, apparent size 30 feet long and 10 feet wide, crossed the sky at high speed.
• March 22, 1950 (Oahu, Hawaii): Noiseless, brilliant green, flame-like object came from the direction of Pearl Harbor, stopped briefly, and then sped away.
• November 27, 1950 (Stanton, N. Dakota): Bright light hovered, changing color from green to red to white to green, moving northeasterly.
• November 30, 1950 (British Guiana): Huge, flaming green, ball-like object with a bluish tail, crossed the sky at 20,000 feet.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the analysis of flying saucer reports, with a particular focus on green fireballs and falling airplanes. The editorial stance is to approach these reports with an open mind, using the extraterrestrial hypothesis as a working theory while critically examining conventional explanations like rocket missiles and meteors. The publication emphasizes the need for more data and scientific basis for any definitive conclusions. The author, E. Rockmore, actively solicits reports from readers to compile a comprehensive yearbook of sightings.

This issue of SR#3, identified as FA, P2 through FA, P9, is copyrighted by E. Rockmore and was printed on March 25, 1952. The primary focus of the publication is the phenomenon of 'green fireballs,' exploring various theories regarding their nature, origin, and purpose, with a particular emphasis on their potential connection to atomic explosions and extraterrestrial communication.

Theory #1: Metallic Surface Heating

The first theory discussed suggests that the green light observed might be the metallic surface of a rocket heating up due to air friction, progressing through various colors from dull red to blue-white hot. This is supported by references to images of jet exhaust and articles on rocket exhaust colors.

Theory #2: Atomic Explosions Causing New Weather

Developed by Palmer, this theory posits a connection between atomic explosions and the creation of green fireballs or strange weather phenomena. The issue presents a chronological list of atomic explosions alongside reported 'green fireballs' or 'meteors' to investigate potential correlations. It notes that some atomic explosion dates were not precisely known, and the number of explosions in certain tests (like Eniwetok) was also uncertain. The analysis indicates that while some events occurred around the same time, a direct causal link is not definitively established, suggesting association rather than creation.

Theory #3: Unusually Heavy Meteoric Shower

This theory, considered the most doubtful by the author, is examined through the statements of meteor astronomer Lincoln LaPaz. Key points include the unusually high number of reports, the lack of a known meteor shower for the period, the absence of secondary smaller meteors, and the unique green color, which is rare in meteoric history. LaPaz theorizes that Earth might be entering a new part of the solar system or space, encountering meteors of a new matter type ('contra-terrene matter'). However, the author notes the lack of proof for this concept and contrasts it with the expected destructive impact of such matter.

The green meteors are described as noiseless, unlike ordinary fireballs which LaPaz states are loud and may have explosions. They also had straight paths, not falling towards Earth but moving across the sky. The size of some green fireballs was reported as much larger and brighter than a full moon. A significant point is the limited geographical area of the early reports (Southwest USA), which, given the vastness of Earth and meteor travel distances, makes a meteoric origin seem fantastic.

Theory #4: Periodic Saucer Activity

This theory examines the historical list of green fireballs for periodicity. While November 1950 was noted as the heaviest month for green fireballs, with 5 reports, the author finds it insufficient to establish a periodic occurrence, though the Nov 2, 1950 report is highlighted as occurring exactly one year before a prominent Nov 2, 1951 green fireball.

Theory #5: Flying Saucers or a New Saucer Type

After ruling out the previous theories, this section considers the objects to be saucers or new types of unknown origin. A comparison table contrasts the characteristics of 'saucers' and 'green fireballs.' Key differences include color (saucers usually white/silvery, green fireballs blue-green to brilliant green), luminosity (saucers reflect light, green fireballs emit their own), size (saucers appear small, green fireballs 50-200 ft diameter), shape (saucers flat/circular, green fireballs ball-like/globular), maneuverability (saucers highly maneuverable, green fireballs not), and time seen (saucers often daytime, green fireballs usually night).

The comparison concludes that fireballs and saucers do not resemble each other, except for being of unknown origin and possibly allied. Two prominent qualities of green fireballs are highlighted: their visibility and bright green color.

A second comparison is made between 'foo fighter-like objects' and 'green fireballs.' Similarities are noted in emitting own light and being ball-like or globular. However, differences exist in color variability, size (foo fighters 1-3 ft, green fireballs 50-200 ft), area visible (foo fighters local, green fireballs widespread), maneuverability (foo fighters extremely maneuverable, green fireballs not), length of time visible (foo fighters 1-10 minutes, green fireballs up to 40 seconds), and physical composition (foo fighters possibly electrical energy, green fireballs possibly self-consuming energy).

The author suggests that the prominence of green fireballs means they are signals to be watched, rather than unobtrusive reconnaissance craft. Reports 13 and 30 are noted as resembling small luminous globes, similar to 'foo fighters,' but not exactly the same.

The Message of the Green Fireballs

If green fireballs are simple signal rockets, the next step is to understand their message. The green color is considered a prominent quality and possibly a definite meaning, perhaps representing the planet's name. The author theorizes that extraterrestrials might not know human language and would communicate on a simple level using flashing lights. The characteristics of planets (Venus, Earth, Mars) in terms of orbit, speed, and color are presented as a potential basis for this communication.

Venus is brilliant white, Mars is red to orange, and Earth is blue-green or green due to its water-covered surface. The author suggests that green fireballs might be signaling Earth alone, using their color as a 'name on the envelope.'

Planetary Correlations

The issue details correlations between green fireball sightings and planetary positions, specifically Mars Close Oppositions and Venus Inferior Conjunctions. For instance, Mars Close Oppositions on Feb 18, 1948, and Mar 23, 1950, are correlated with green fireball reports. Venus Inferior Conjunctions on Jan 31, 1950, and Sept 3, 1951, are also linked to sightings. The author emphasizes the statistical improbability of these events coinciding by chance, suggesting a strong link to planetary configurations.

The correlation with Venus Conjunctions is noted as less exact but still interesting, with some 'changing color foo-fighter objects' appearing in the same month. The English green fireball report in 1950 is mentioned as potentially occurring on a Venus conjunction day. A third correlation involves heavy green fireball showers occurring near Venus Conjunctions.

Planetary Configuration and Signal Rockets

The author notes a periodicity to reports before and after important planetary conjunctions, suggesting that 'communication or signal' objects appear around these times. A table lists planetary configurations (Mars Oppositions, Venus Conjunctions) and associated events, including green fireballs and explosions, occurring before and after these configurations.

The theory of Earth year and half-year periodicity is presented as suggestive but not yet proven. The most spectacular green fireball on Nov 2 is linked to being 6 months before a Mars Opposition. The remaining 14 green fireballs are not fully explained by this theory alone, but the possibility of them also signaling terrestrial events like atomic explosions is raised.

Overall Patterns, Conclusions, and Possible Future Activity

This section summarizes the findings. A significant change in activity is noted, shifting from silvery saucers to brilliant, green, widely seen 'fireballs.' The amount of activity shows a sharp drop in saucer reports but an increase when green and red fireballs are included. Three short periods of unusually heavy activity are identified: Oct 9-14, Oct 30-Nov 11, and Nov 19-21. The area of activity has shifted from the midwest/midsouth to the southwest, northeast, and southeast, with the southwest increase attributed to green fireball reports influenced by atomic explosions.

Conclusions:
1. Green fireballs are likely simple, pilotless, self-consuming signal rockets due to their burning out in mid-air, leaving fiery pieces without wreckage, and being brilliant and widely seen.
2. Green fireballs likely represent the first known prominent or public communication, with small local reports correlating with planetary configuration dates.
3. They are not saucers due to significant differences in size and characteristics. They are likely carried by giant spaceships.
4. They signal awareness of important planetary events (oppositions, conjunctions) and terrestrial events (atomic explosions, radar contacts).
5. The green color likely represents Earth's name.

Possible Future Activity:
Based on planetary proximity and the 'Lubbock ships,' increased activity and communication attempts are expected. Predictions include more green fireball reports after atomic tests, more complex communication attempts involving 'foo-fighters' changing colors to signify planetary colors (Mars and Earth), and potential aerial explosions attributed to supersonic aircraft.

Final Notes

The issue concludes with publication details, noting it was finished and printed on March 25, 1952, and all material is copyrighted by E. Rockmore. Critical comments with proof are requested.

Title: THE SAUCER REVIEW
Issue: #3
Volume: RS
Date: Covering Nov 1 to Dec 31 1951
Publisher: E. Rockmore
Purpose: To collect and study saucer sightings and activity to understand the motives of extraterrestrials.

Policies and Plans

The Saucer Review is a bimonthly newsmagazine that relies on people sending in recent newspaper reports of UFO phenomena. It can be obtained by loaning 5 clippings for one month or paying 3 clippings per issue. Recent clippings are preferred. For photostatic prints of reports (10-15 pages), 15 clippings can be loaned or 10 paid. Readers are encouraged to contact local newspapers for clipping departments to obtain reports, especially for meteor sightings which might be miscategorized.

Future plans include adding a fourth section or a Historical Supplement if enough people are interested in exchanging reports, focusing on saucer history since 1947 and earlier.

Contents

The magazine is divided into three sections:
1. PHOTOSTAT SECTION: Contains all reports received for the issue, serving as proof of occurrence. This is only in the Special Issue of Saucer Review.
2. REWRITE SECTION: Condenses all reports to basic facts, separating newspaper color from the report for analysis.
3. ANALYSIS SECTION: Examines all reports to find motives, patterns, and possible future actions.

Rewrite of Saucer Reports 43 to 84 (Nov 1 to Dec 31 1951)

This section details numerous sightings from late 1951:

• October 1951:
• Oct 12, 1951: Salisbury, North Carolina. A large, silvery ball-like object (approx. 20 ft diameter) at 3,100 ft altitude crossed the sky easterly.
• Oct 14, 1951:
• Off Atlantic Coast: Fiery ball-like object observed crossing the sky.
• Pulaski, Virginia: Fiery ball-like object crossed the sky.
• Richmond, Virginia: Same fiery ball-like object observed.
• Washington, D.C.: Same fiery ball-like object observed.
• Vandegrift and Oilo, Pennsylvania: Fiery object fell toward Earth, light died out at 150 ft. Later, an object shattered a car window.
• Overbrook, Pennsylvania: Fiery Red ball-like object observed.
• Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania: Fiery object crossed sky, observed by a pilot.
• Greensburg, Pennsylvania: Heavy concussion, smoke, and a scorched field; fire ascribed to pranksters.
• Near Hodgeville, West Virginia: Heavy radio interference, followed by a bright orange object (football size) at 75 ft altitude, fell slowly and struck a mountainside.
• Charleston, West Virginia: Same fiery ball-like object seen.
• Sutton, West Virginia: Same object observed by 2 airline pilots.
• Various locations in West Virginia (Richwood, Buckhannon, etc.): Same object observed.
• Afron, Ohio: Fiery, ball-like object at 5,500 ft altitude exploded, lighting the sky.
• Cleveland, Ohio: Brilliant blue, ball-like object burst with a red flash.
• Oct 16?, 1951: Whidbey Island, Washington: Unknown object resembling a balloon or astronomical object observed by 3 people in an airplane.
• Oct 30, 1951:
• Near Far Rockaway, Long Island, NY: Object resembling a small airplane crashed into the sea; no wreckage found.
• Southwest USA: First green fireball 'meteor' seen.
• Near a meteor crater in Arizona: Second bright green fireball seen.
• Nov 2, 1951:
• East of Lordsburg, New Mexico: Brilliant green fiery, ball-like object observed.
• Albuquerque and Sante Fe, New Mexico: Same object seen.
• Gallup, New Mexico: Object resembling a fireworks rocket crossed sky and vanished with a blue flash.
• Phoenix, Arizona: Noiseless, brilliant green, ball-like object leaving a fiery blue trail.
• Flagstaff, Arizona: Noiseless, bright blue-green object crossed sky, leaving a fiery red and smoky trail.
• Near Flagstaff, Arizona: Noiseless, reddish-blue object lit the countryside, appearing to fall toward Earth, observed by an airline pilot.
• Two Guns, Arizona: Noiseless, flaming ball-like object followed by a grayish blue streak, appeared to fall near Canyon Padre.
• Bisbee, Yuma, Mormon Lake, Prescott, Arizona: Same object observed.
• Las Vegas, Nevada: Same object observed.
• Salt Lake City, Utah: Same flash observed.
• Cajon Pass, California: Noiseless, brilliant luminous object exploded with a huge noiseless flash.
• Colton, Redlands, Visalia, etc., California: Same object seen.
• San Bernardino, California: Tremendous flash of light seen.
• Northwestern Arizona: Astronomer LaPaz stated object appeared to vanish over this area.

• November 1951:
• Nov 4, 1951: Farmington, New Mexico: Noiseless, huge, brilliant green object with a whitish tail appeared to fall at a 35° angle and vanished.
• Nov 6, 1951: Fort Bliss, Texas: Object with a flashing tail crossed sky, or a flash of light occurred, ascribed to a missile testing area.
• Nov 7, 1951:
• Des Moines, New Mexico: Luminous, ball-like object observed.
• 30 miles west of Roswell, New Mexico: Flaming object struck ground and continued to burn.
• Hobbs, New Mexico: Luminous, bright green, tear-shaped object at 10,000 ft altitude crossed sky eastward.
• Carlsbad, New Mexico: Bright, luminous object with a blue-green tail became yellowish moving eastward.
• Kirtland Field, Albuquerque, New Mexico: Bright-blue object crossed sky eastward.
• Albuquerque, New Mexico: Bright white object turned green crossing sky.
• Artesia, Tucumcari, Clovis, Portales, New Mexico: Same object seen.
• Dallas, Texas: Brilliant, fiery ball-like object crossed sky near airport.
• Various locations in Texas (San Angelo, Big Springs, etc.): Same object observed.
• Liberal, Kansas: Fiery object, 20 ft long, at 150 ft altitude, crossed sky.
• Manhattan, Kansas: Same object observed.
• Reno, Oklahoma: Bright object exploded over the city.
• Near Weatherford, Oklahoma: Brilliant luminous object tumbled through air, pieces breaking off.
• Hinton, Oklahoma: Luminous object crossed sky, accompanied by heavy concussion.
• Nov 7, 1951 (Addenda):
• Anadarko Area, Oklahoma: Loud swooshing sound followed by concussion.
• Okarche, Oklahoma: Luminous, ball-like object with blue tail and orange trail made a thunder-like noise.
• Various locations in Oklahoma (Gage, Clinton, etc.): Same object observed.
• Nov 7, 1951:
• Near Hartford, Arkansas: Object resembling a small plane appeared to crash; no wreckage found.
• Anadarko, Oklahoma: Metallic substance resembling shredded tinfoil found on farmland.
• Nov 8, 1951:
• Sells, Arizona: Object resembling a ball of fire at 1000 ft altitude crossed sky and appeared to strike earth.
• Tucson, Arizona: Flaming object giving off varicolored flames and smoke crossed sky and appeared to strike earth, leaving smoke puffs.
• Cloverdale, New Mexico: 2 loud explosions shook houses.
• Las Cruces, New Mexico: Dazzling white object with a tail streaked across the sky.
• Near Sierra Blanca, Texas: Flaming object with purplish-red tail crossed sky and appeared to strike earth.
• El Paso, Texas: Rocket-like object raced across sky; another report described it as a ball of fire with a flaming tail, appearing to land.
• Douglas, Arizona: Brilliant green, luminous object left a green trail and faded out, leaving white smoke puffs.
• Alamagordo, New Mexico: 2 separate, brilliant green objects flying parallel crossed sky.
• Nov 8, 1951:
• Guzman, Mexico: Fiery, ball-like object appeared to break in half and explode.
• Near Tucson, Arizona: Object resembling a plane appeared to crash; no wreckage or craters found.
• Nov 9, 1951:
• Neveurgh, New York: Long streak of vapor in the sky, ascribed to a large plane.
• Goshen, New York: Jet plane flew over city leaving a vapor trail.
• Middletown, New York: Object resembling a ball of fire or a pink streak crossed sky.
• Port Jervis, New York: Long vapor trail seen; a policeman saw a golden object causing it, and a newspaper editor's wife saw a red object.
• Milford, Pennsylvania: Long cloudlike streak in the sky.
• Nov 9, 1951: Titusville, Pennsylvania: A very large airplane or bomber crossed sky, followed by 2 silvery round objects with smoke streaks, which then separated.
• Nov 10, 1951:
• Tucumcari, New Mexico: Fiery, ball-like object with a long flaming trail crossed sky, observed by police.
• Cuervo, New Mexico: Fiery, ball-like object with a long flaming red trail at 10,000 ft altitude crossed sky.
• Near Durango, Colorado: Object resembling a fiery ball appeared to fall nearby.
• Conway, Arkansas: Bright object lit up the countryside.
• Nov 11, 1951:
• Hartford, Connecticut: Unknown object crossed sky, leaving a wide blue-green trail with red streaks.
• Newington, Connecticut: Same phenomenon observed.
• Nov 13?, 1951: Near Hamburg, New York: A long, very bright greenish flash of light crossed the northeast sky.
• Nov 14, 1951:
• Miami, Florida: Long trail of smoke or vapor in the sky, ascribed to a B47 jet bomber.
• Near Lake Worth, Florida: Object resembling a small airplane appeared to crash; no wreckage found.
• Nov 16, 1951:
• Sonoma, California: Unknown object with an orange trail at 1000 ft altitude raced across the sky, disappearing into trees. A brilliant white flash and smoke were observed, with burning grass and trees found.
• Limekiln, Pennsylvania: Several luminous objects or lights flashed and spun in the sky.
• Nov 19, 1951:
• Riverside, California: A circular disc-like object with a dome flew past observers; a photograph was taken.
• Mayaguez, Puerto Rico: Bright green, ball-like object came from the south, crossed the sky, becoming brilliant green before disappearing.
• Nov 20, 1951:
• Syracuse, New York: Shining object crossed sky at great speed.
• St. Thomas, Virgin Islands: Long vapor trail coming from northwest burst into parts with a blinding white light, observed by a fighter pilot.
• Albuquerque, New Mexico: Bright green meteor crossed sky.
• Dodge City, Kansas: Bright green fireball crossed sky.
• Lubbock, Texas: Bright Green fireball seen.
• Nov 21, 1951: Muncie, Indiana: Huge green, ball-like object with a long tail travelled from north to south.
• Nov 24, 1951:
• Grand Rapids, Michigan: Ball of light at low altitude crossed sky at great speed, observed by pilots and airport tower.
• Piscobama, Peru: 2 bright objects with tails (resembling comets) were visible.
• Nov 25, 1951: Piscobama, Peru: 2 bright objects with tails (resembling comets) were visible.
• Nov 26, 1951: Korea: Bright green, red, and yellow flare-like objects filled skies; US speculated they might be communist celebrations.
• Nov 29, 1951: Shoals, Indiana: Unknown object leaving a white vapor trail moved fast, stopped, then moved fast again, banking and maneuvering before disappearing northwest. It was circular, streamlined, with a dome-like top, composed of white metal.
• Nov 30, 1951: Prescott, Arizona: Bright whitish-blue object leaving a red-orange trail climbed vertically to 20,000 ft, gave off a brilliant flash, and continued climbing until it disappeared, observed by 2 airliners.

• December 1951:
• Dec 4, 1951: Muncie, Indiana: Fiery red, ball-like object with a long flaming tail crossed sky from west to north.
• Dec 13, 1951: Tucumcari, New Mexico: Small fiery, ball-like object streaked across sky and appeared to land near a water tank, causing a roaring sound and the tank to break, resulting in 4 deaths. Examination revealed a clean break but no holes or craters.
• Dec 20, 1951: Between Yuma and Gila Bend, Arizona: Brilliant, glowing, disc-like object (approx. 3 ft size) seen in the sky.
• Dec 21, 1951: Near Frazier Park, California: Object resembling a large transport plane with flames shooting from an engine appeared to be falling at a 45° angle and crash into mountains; searches found nothing.

Addenda Reports

This section includes reports directly from observers that could not be verified through newspapers or lacked important details like exact date or place.

• Oct 19, 1951: Near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: A noiseless, dark, oval or disc-like object with sharply defined edges hung motionless low over the horizon.
• Nov ??, 1951: Singapore, Malay States: Fiery, green, ball-like object seen.
• Nov ??, 1951: Ssecone, Switzerland to France: A 'howling or roaring' green, disc-like object crossed the sky, observed by over 20 persons.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the sheer volume and variety of UFO sightings reported during the period, primarily in the United States. The objects are often described as fiery balls, luminous objects, or disc-like shapes, exhibiting unusual speeds, altitudes, and behaviors, sometimes accompanied by electromagnetic effects or physical traces. The editorial stance, as indicated by the publication's purpose and the inclusion of the "Addenda Reports" section, is to meticulously collect and document these phenomena, even if direct verification is difficult, with the ultimate goal of understanding the underlying causes and potential motives behind these sightings. The reliance on newspaper clippings suggests a preference for reports that have undergone some level of initial scrutiny.

Title: Saucer Review
Issue: SR#3
Volume: AS
Date: November 1 to December 30, 1951
Publisher: E.Rockmore
Country: USA
Language: English

This issue of the Saucer Review presents an analysis of flying saucer reports numbered 43 to 84, covering the period from November 1 to December 30, 1951. The publication's stated purpose is to analyze these reports using a temporary working theory that they are caused by extra-terrestrial life forms, acknowledging that the subject is open to other theories due to insufficient definitive data. The analysis is based on a study of various books and journals, including the works of Charles Fort.

General Analysis of Single Reports

The magazine meticulously details individual reports, categorizing them and providing brief analyses. Many reports are deemed "probably a saucer" or "possibly allied to the saucers," with explanations often ruling out conventional aircraft, balloon, or meteor origins due to unusual characteristics such as speed, movement against prevailing winds, or lack of typical meteor behavior.

Several reports focus on unusual phenomena like "green fireballs." For instance, report #44 from Virginia to Ohio describes the sixth "giant meteor" seen in the southeast in a year, noting its suspicious timing during a heavy saucer period and the unusual occurrence of objects striking personal property, which contradicts typical meteor behavior.

Reports from #43 to #74 are systematically reviewed, with locations ranging across the USA, including Salisbury, NC; Virginia; Ohio; West Virginia; Thidhey, Washington; Far Rockaway, NY; Southwest USA; Arizona; New Mexico; Farmington, NM; Fort Bliss, Texas; Oklahoma; Hartford, Ark; Tucson, Arizona; Middleton, NY; and others. Each report is assessed for its unique characteristics and potential explanations.

Some reports are noted as having "insufficient information for conclusion," while others are tentatively identified as airplanes or balloons, though often with puzzling aspects. The analysis frequently compares new reports to previous ones, seeking patterns and correlations.

Green Fireball Reports Analysis

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to the "General Analysis of Green Fireball Reports." Reports #47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 55, 58, 59, 60, 66, 69, 70, 78, and 79 are grouped together due to their similar details and insufficient information for separate analysis. The primary consideration for these reports is whether they have a conventional origin or an extra-terrestrial one.

Terrestrial Origin Theories

1. New US rocket missiles: This theory is considered doubtful. The analysis points out that current automatic direction controls are too inefficient for launching rockets over populated areas. It also questions the security implications and international repercussions of firing missiles over other countries, especially given the potential for accidents. The rarity of mass-produced rockets and the high cost of launching them are also cited.
2. New weather phenomenon caused by atomic explosions: This theory is not elaborated upon in the provided text.

Extra-Terrestrial Origin Theories

3. Unusually heavy meteoric shower: This is considered a possibility.
4. A periodic yearly saucer activity date: This suggests a cyclical nature to sightings.
5. Flying saucers, or a new saucer type or aerial object: This aligns with the publication's primary working theory.

The analysis specifically addresses the characteristics of rocket exhaust flames, noting that they typically range from orange-red to bright red or possibly blue-white, and that a green-colored exhaust is unknown in this field. The possibility of a chemical exhaust producing a green light is raised but questioned.

Historical Listing of Green Saucers and Green Fireballs (1946-1951)

This section provides a chronological listing of prominent reports of green saucers and green fireballs from 1946 to 1951. The author notes that this list is taken from their collection and may not be complete but is considered satisfactory as a general guide. The author solicits additional reports or details from readers.

Notable entries in this historical list include:

• August 13, 1946, Sweden: A torpedo-shaped object with a tapered tail emitted green and blue smoke and a series of fireballs.
• August 16, 1946, Oregon, USA: Many green and red flares with smoky cumulus clouds were observed.
• September 15, 1946, Portugal: A bluish ball of light moved in the sky for five minutes.
• September 14 & 15, 1946, Tangiers, Morocco: Large, fiery, ball-like objects with huge green tails streaked with red crossed the sky.
• July 4, 1947, Canada: A bright green saucer-like object crossed the sky.
• December 8, 1947, Nevada, USA: A bright green, small light rose into the sky at tremendous speed.
• December 30, 1947, Washington, USA: A brilliant blue-green ball of fire rose from the earth past an airliner and disappeared into the sky within six seconds.
• February 17, 1948, Washington, USA: A fire-like glow was observed.
• February 18, 1948, Washington, USA: A flashing green light was observed.
• March 10, 1948, Mid Pacific Ocean: A bright green meteor was observed by an officer.
• April 1, 1948, Belgium: Fiery green or blue, ball-like objects crossed the sky.
• April 12, 1949, USA: A great green meteor crossed the sky in a flat trajectory and apparently exploded.
• December 5 & 15, 1949, Southwest USA: Green fireball meteors were seen.
• January ??, 1950, England: A green light with a trail of white sparks crossed the sky at great speed.
• March 13, 1950, Utah, USA: A brilliant blue-green object crossed the sky at high speed.
• March 22, 1950, Hawaii, USA: A noiseless, brilliant green, flame-like object traveled straight across the sky.
• January 10, 1950, New Mexico, USA: Two bright lights changed color and crossed the skies.
• April 8, 1950, New York, USA: A circular object emitting a blue-green glow crossed the sky at great speed.
• August 8, 1950, California, USA: A bright green flash of light was followed by a white glare.
• Early New 1950, Argentina: A large, green-transparent, globular object circled a town.
• November 7, 1950, New Jersey, USA: A ball-like object changing color crossed the sky.
• November 23, 1950, Ireland: A green, saucer-like object with red and blue spots crossed over the city.
• November 27, 1950, North Dakota, USA: A bright light hovered in the sky, changing color.
• November 30, 1950, Alaska: A brilliant blue-white object traveled across Alaska and apparently exploded.
• November 30, 1950, British Guiana: A huge, flaming green, ball-like object with a bluish tail crossed the sky.
• January 28, 1951, Michigan, USA: Strange blue-green flashes of light or a blinking streak of light were observed.
• February 1, 1951, Oregon to California, USA: A green meteor changing to red and white crossed the sky.
• September 9-11, 1951, Arizona, USA: A large brilliant light with smaller lights on either side flashed colors and made swooping passes.

Addenda Reports

This section includes additional reports that do not fit neatly into the main analysis, such as a 'green meteor' or 'fireball' from Singapore and Switzerland, and a report from Pittsburgh, PA, describing a semi-transparent cloud-like object.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the analysis of unexplained aerial phenomena, particularly flying saucers and green fireballs, and the persistent effort to find logical explanations, whether conventional or extra-terrestrial. The editorial stance, as represented by the author E. Rockmore, is one of rigorous investigation and data collection. While open to conventional explanations, the publication leans towards the extra-terrestrial hypothesis due to the persistent lack of definitive proof for other theories and the unusual characteristics reported. The author actively seeks reader contributions to build a comprehensive yearbook of UFO reports, indicating a dedication to documenting and understanding these phenomena.

This issue of SR#3, identified as Volume FA, Issue 3, copyrighted by E. Rockmore and printed on March 25, 1952, focuses on the phenomenon of 'green fireballs'. The publication delves into various theories attempting to explain these sightings, ranging from atmospheric effects and atomic explosions to extraterrestrial communication.

Theory #1: Rocket Exhaust

The initial theory suggests that the green light observed might be the metallic surface of rockets heating up due to air friction, producing a color not typically seen in metal heating (which usually results in red to yellow hues). The article references a 'Life' magazine photo of a jet fighter's bluish-purple exhaust and a 'Popular Science' article describing the Martin Viking rocket's exhaust as orange, red, and blue.

Theory #2: Atomic Explosions and Weather Phenomena

A second theory, developed by Palmer, posits that atomic explosions could cause new or strange weather phenomena, including these fireballs. While considered plausible in some aspects, the theory lacks sufficient proof. The author attempts to correlate atomic explosion dates with the occurrences of green fireballs, listing dates of atomic explosions (New Mexico, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Bikini, Eniwetok, Russia) and dates of green fireballs observed globally (Sweden, USA, Spanish Morocco, Portugal, North Africa, Canada, Nevada, Washington, Hawaii, Belgium, England, Maine).

However, upon comparing the lists, the article notes only minor correlations. For instance, after the June and July 1946 Bikini atomic explosions, seven green fireballs were reported in the European-Africa area. Yet, this area is geographically distant from Bikini, and these reports coincided with the 'Ghost Rocket' sightings in Sweden, suggesting a possible connection to that phenomenon rather than the atomic tests. Another correlation is noted between the February 1951 and January 28, 1951, green-red meteor and green flash sightings over California and Detroit, Michigan. While the dates align, the locations are not near the explosion sites. The September Russian explosions lack specific dates, preventing correlation. The Oct-Nov Nevada atomic tests showed a correlation with eight green fireballs appearing afterward, but without a clear ratio or periodicity, suggesting an association rather than causation.

Theory #3: Unusually Heavy Meteoric Shower

Lincoln LaPaz, a meteor astronomer, is cited regarding the theory of an unusually heavy meteoric shower. This theory is deemed doubtful. LaPaz notes the high frequency of fireball reports in a short period (13 days) without prior history in the area. He also points out the unusual green color, the lack of recovered meteoric pieces, and the absence of secondary smaller meteors. LaPaz theorizes that Earth might be entering a new part of the solar system, encountering matter with reversed electrical charges ('contra-terrene matter'). However, this is presented as an abstract concept without proof. The article contrasts this with the expected outcome of contra-terrene matter colliding with ordinary matter, which should result in massive energy release, not minor fires. LaPaz also states that meteors of fireball size are typically noisy and can have explosions, whereas the green meteors were mostly noiseless. Their straight paths, not falling towards Earth, also distinguish them from ordinary meteors. The rarity of such large and bright objects is emphasized, and the limited geographical area of the initial reports (Southwest USA) is highlighted as statistically improbable for meteors traveling millions of miles.

Theory #4: Periodic Saucer Activity

This theory suggests a periodicity in green fireball activity. While November 1950 was the heaviest month with five reports, the author finds no consistent periodicity to establish this as a regular occurrence.

Theory #5: Flying Saucers or a New Saucer Type

Having ruled out previous theories, the objects are considered either saucers or a new type of saucer. A comparison between 'saucers' and 'green fireballs' reveals significant differences. Saucers are typically white, silvery, or transparent, reflect light, and are seen in daytime. Green fireballs are bright blue-green to brilliant green, emit their own light, are seen at night, and appear much larger (airplane-sized) than saucers. While both are of unknown origin, their characteristics are distinct. The article notes that green fireballs are prominently visible and have a bright green color.

Comparison with 'Foo Fighter-Like Objects'

A further comparison is made between 'foo fighter-like objects' and green fireballs. Foo fighters are described as variable in color (red, orange, white, blue-green), emit their own light, are small (1-3 feet), easily seen locally, and are extremely maneuverable. Green fireballs, in contrast, are a constant bright green, emit their own light, are very large (50-200 feet), seen over vast areas, and are not maneuverable, following a single path. The article concludes that while there are some similarities, the primary difference lies in the degree of activity and complexity. The author suggests that green fireballs are 'signal objects' or 'rockets' rather than complex communication devices like foo fighters.

The 'Signal Rocket' Theory

Applying the analogy of marine Very signal rockets (indicating distress) versus shuttered lights (complex communication), the author posits that green fireballs, with their simple, non-maneuverable paths, are akin to simple signal rockets. These are proposed to be launched by advanced craft, possibly 'giant spaceships', and are self-consuming. The green color is interpreted as a 'name on the envelope', representing Earth's color, not the message itself.

Message and Planetary Correlation

The article explores the potential 'message' of these signals. Given the lack of a common language, communication is theorized to be through flashing lights. The author proposes that the origin of these signals might be related to planetary characteristics. Three prominent qualities of planets are discussed: their orbital distance from the sun, their speed of revolution, and their color. Venus is brilliant white, Mars is red to orange, and Earth is blue-green due to its water coverage. The article then correlates green fireball sightings with planetary configurations, specifically Mars Close Oppositions and Venus Conjunctions. Several sightings are noted to have occurred around these planetary events, suggesting a possible link. The author highlights the statistical improbability of these coincidences, strengthening the argument for a deliberate signal.

Overall Patterns, Conclusions, and Future Activity

The analysis concludes that green fireballs represent a shift from silvery, locally seen saucers to brilliant, green, widely seen objects. Despite a drop in saucer reports, the inclusion of green fireballs and 'falling' airplanes increases the total number of reports significantly. Three periods of unusually heavy activity are identified: Oct 9-14, Oct 30-Nov 11, and Nov 19-21. The article suggests these periods might be linked to atomic explosions and Mars Oppositions, though definitive proof is lacking. The area of activity has shifted from the midsouth and midwest to the southwest, northeast, and southeast, with a notable increase in southwest reports attributed to green fireballs and atomic explosions.

Conclusions:
1. Green fireballs are likely simple, pilotless, self-consuming signal rockets due to their burning out in mid-air, falling pieces that set fires but leave no wreckage, and their brilliant visibility over great distances.
2. They represent the first known prominent public communication, distinct from smaller, localized reports tied to planetary configuration dates.
3. They are not saucers due to significant differences in size and maneuverability; they are likely carried and launched by giant spaceships.
4. They signal awareness of important planetary events (oppositions, conjunctions) and terrestrial events like atomic explosions or radar contacts with the Moon.
5. The green color likely signifies Earth's name, being the planet's color and unique in meteoric history.

Possible Future Activity:
Based on planetary proximity and the theory of signal rockets, a heavy increase in reports and communication attempts is expected. This may include more green fireball sightings after atomic tests, more complex communication attempts as oppositions approach (potentially involving color-changing objects signifying planetary colors), and aerial explosions attributed to supersonic aircraft. The author requests critical comments and proof from readers.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the investigation into the nature and origin of unexplained aerial phenomena, specifically green fireballs. The editorial stance, as presented by E. Rockmore, is analytical and theoretical, attempting to find rational explanations by correlating sightings with known events (atomic explosions, planetary movements) and proposing new hypotheses (signal rockets, extraterrestrial communication). The author is open to new evidence and encourages reader participation in verifying or disproving the theories presented.