Flying Saucer Observations vol 2 no 1

Magazine Overview

Title: FLYING SAUCER OBSERVATIONS
Issue: VOLUME TWO, NUMBER ONE
Publisher: ALBERT S. GREENFIELD MEMORIAL PRESS
Date: Circa 1970s (implied by content discussing the 1970s)

This issue of "Flying Saucer Observations" serves as an official publication of the Albert S. Greenfield Memorial Press, edited by Allen H. Greenfield. It delves into the evolving landscape of the UFO field, particularly focusing on the transition and emerging trends of the early 1970s.

The Turn of the Wheel in UFology

The editorial begins by reflecting on the author's entry into the UFO field over a decade prior, noting that it was then dominated by figures like George Adamski, Gray Barker, and James W. Moseley. The author observes a significant shift in emphasis, both in terms of personalities and publications, with a new generation appearing to take the lead.

Several publications are cited as examples of this shift. The discontinuation of Gene Duplantier's "Saucers, Space and Science" is mentioned, following the demise of "Saucer News" and "The Saucerian." Conversely, newer publications like "Skylook" and "UFO Commentary" have emerged, with their staffs potentially representing the future leadership of ufology in the 1970s. The author acknowledges that many of these individuals are not entirely new to the field, but asserts that circumstances have placed a significant leadership mantle upon them for the coming decade.

Who Are They?

The article introduces "UFO Commentary," which has overcome an initial crisis and continues publication. Its first editor, Patrick Huyghe, a young man from Newport News and a student at the University of Virginia, handed over editorship to Allen Benz. Benz is noted as holding degrees from the University of San Diego and the University of Missouri. The author expresses hope that both Huyghe and Benz will remain active in the field and continue "UFO Commentary." Other notable figures mentioned include Stanton Friedman and John Schuessler, both described as academically and personally impressive, with Friedman being a highly sought-after UFO lecturer. Mrs. Norma Short, editor of "Skylook," also receives favorable mention.

Hayden Hewes of Oklahoma City is identified as a significant figure for the future, alongside Lucius Farish and Ted Phillips.

Whither Ufology?

The author speculates on the future direction of ufology, suggesting that despite efforts by figures like John Keel and Jacques Vallee, the field might continue to be characterized by conservatism. The extraterrestrial hypothesis is expected to remain dominant, with ultraterrestrialism yet to gain significant traction. The author hopes that proponents of alternative concepts will not be discouraged.

Conventions and conclaves are predicted to become increasingly important. Ironically, while this mode of expression is growing, the long-running "Congress of Scientific Ufologists," representing the "old wing" of ufology, may be struggling. The author fears for the future of this "old wing," emphasizing that its survival depends on individual initiative and collective activity, and that it should not isolate itself from the newer wing. Mutual criticism between the "old" and "new" wings is deemed counterproductive.

Barometers of the Future

This section addresses the question of whether ufology as a whole is in trouble and if public interest is declining. While acknowledging that publicity has decreased since the "great days" of 1966-67, the author argues that public grassroots interest remains strong, albeit perhaps latent. A significant wave of domestic saucer cases, if reported effectively by the media, could reignite major public interest.

An example of continued interest is provided by a lecture given by nuclear physicist Stanton Friedman at the Georgia Institute of Technology on April 18, 1972, which drew an audience of 150-175 people, reportedly the largest for the sponsoring body that year. Friedman's lectures elsewhere, such as one at the University of California, Berkeley, have drawn much larger crowds (approximately 1250 people). Friedman's lecture covered topics including Project Blue Book Special Report #14, NICAP's "The UFO Evidence," and the Condon Report, and he presented a persuasive case for the feasibility of interstellar travel.

However, not all news from Friedman was positive. A recent UFO event in Oklahoma City had a low turnout, which the author hopes will not discourage ufologists but rather spur them to redouble their efforts. News regarding publications from the newer wing of ufology is generally encouraging.

The author relays to Friedman the demise of "Saucers, Space & Science." In a "farewell letter" from editor Gene Duplantier, an insight into the attitude contributing to the "old wing's" decline is offered. Duplantier expresses a sense of unending effort without definitive resolution, stating, "We never thought we would solve the UFO mystery as others thought they would...and we haven't. It's been like a long-walk down an endless tube." He also notes that many significant events have turned out to be hoaxes or misinterpretations, and that a reverse trend in interest began in 1968, leading to a loss of readers.

The author expresses sympathy with Duplantier's views, acknowledging that ufology can feel like a "long walk down an endless tube" with the goal always beyond reach. The subject of saucers no longer enjoys the fame it once did. However, the author questions the productivity of such defeatism, drawing a parallel to the centuries-long development of astronomy. The piece concludes this section by urging a focus on accentuating the positive and working to develop interest, rather than giving up.

Further signs of activity include new publications by Eugene R. Steinberg and Timothy Green Beckley, and James W. Moseley taking on a significant role within the Congress of Scientific Ufologists. The author expresses hope that individuals like Al Manak, Gene Duplantier, Rick Hilberg, and Edward Biebel will continue their participation, while also applauding and encouraging ufologists from the newer wing.

Meanwhile...

The editorial concludes with a reminder not to get lost in internal discussions and to "Don't, in all this intrapolitical discussion forget about them. The saucers, I mean."

Note: Quotations from Gene Duplantier are taken from a circular titled "Important Notice," from 17 Shetland Street, Willowdale, Ontario, Canada.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The central theme of this issue is the transition and evolution within the ufology field during the early 1970s. It highlights the generational shift, the changing landscape of UFO publications, and the emergence of new personalities. The editorial stance is one of cautious optimism, acknowledging the challenges and potential decline in public interest while advocating for continued effort, collaboration between different factions within ufology, and a focus on positive engagement with the subject. There is a clear encouragement for the "newer wing" of ufology while also recognizing the value of experience from the "old wing."