Magazine Summary
FMS Foundation Newsletter
Summary
The FMS Foundation Newsletter highlights the growing awareness of False Memory Syndrome, with increasing media coverage and family involvement. The foundation receives numerous calls from accusers questioning their memories and from families devastated by accusations. The newsletter discusses the nature of memory, the lack of scientific evidence for repressed memories, and the conflicting statistics on child sexual abuse. It also touches upon the ethical practices of therapists and provides resources for families and professionals.
Magazine Overview
The FMS Foundation Newsletter, dated July 21, 1992, serves as a communication channel for the False Memory Syndrome Foundation. The newsletter aims to inform the public about the nature of memory, the phenomenon of false memories, and the impact of accusations of abuse, particularly incest, often recovered through therapy.
Key Articles and Content
Introduction and Foundation's Work The newsletter opens with a letter to 'Dear Friends,' addressing the public's intrigue with the name 'False Memory Syndrome Foundation.' The foundation reports a significant increase in calls and families seeking assistance, noting that a year ago they knew of only one family in this situation, whereas now they are aware of over 650 families with similar stories. The foundation highlights increased media attention, with articles appearing in major newspapers and an upcoming piece in the New York Times. They emphasize that false memory syndrome is now a subject open for discussion and examination. The foundation is also planning a national conference to discuss repressed memory issues.
Understanding Memory A significant portion of the newsletter is dedicated to explaining the nature of human memory. It clarifies that memories are not stored like photographs or computer data but are actively reconstructed and reinterpreted. The newsletter challenges the notion of 'repressed memories' as a defense mechanism against trauma, questioning why such memories are not reported from events like the Holocaust. It also points to recovered memories of implausible events (e.g., alien abuse, past lives, birth canal experiences) as phenomena that any theory of repression must explain.
Calls to the Foundation The newsletter details the types of calls received by the foundation: * Accusers: Individuals who question their own recovered memories and therapy. The foundation states it documents stories but does not verify them, emphasizing accountability for perpetrators while acknowledging the distress of those with false memories. * Families: Families devastated by accusations of incest and abuse, often from adult children who have recovered memories. These families report severed relationships and the difficulty of reconciling accusations with their knowledge of the accused parent. * Professionals: Approximately 40% of calls come from lawyers, doctors, mental health workers, university administrators, and representatives from 'think tanks' and government agencies seeking information. * Reporters: Journalists from across the nation contact the foundation for stories.
Statistics and Sexual Abuse The newsletter critically examines statistics related to child sexual abuse. It notes the wide discrepancies in reported figures (ranging from 6% to 62%) and questions the reliability of data collected during periods of increased reporting mandates. The foundation suggests that the Department of Health and Human Services' figures, in the single digits, might be more reflective of the actual incidence when using strict definitions.
Survey Data on Children with False Memories Several pages are dedicated to presenting data from surveys of children who have recovered memories. Key findings include: * Distance from Parents: Children with false memories do not necessarily live far from their parents. * Marital Status: No clear pattern emerges regarding the marital status of accusing children. * Psychiatric History: Most children who recovered memories did not have a history of psychological or psychiatric treatment before going to a therapist as an adult. * Stressful Situations: Common stressful situations reported in the two to three years prior to memory recovery include physical illness, emotional illness, relationship issues, job/school stress, and trauma. * Discipline Methods: Data on discipline methods used in childhood suggests a variety of approaches, with spanking and sending to room being common. * Parental Responsibility: In many families, one parent assumed greater responsibility for discipline. * Number of Children in Accused Families: Statistics are provided on the number of children in families facing accusations. * Parental Work: A significant number of fathers (35 out of 131) worked outside the home during the period of alleged abuse. * Other Adults in Home: In a notable portion of cases, other adults (grandparents, nannies, friends, relatives) were in close contact with the accusing child.
Meetings and Resources
The newsletter announces upcoming meetings for families across the United States and Canada, where members share learned information and discuss strategies for informing influential people. It also lists recommended readings, including "Freudian Fraud" by E. Fuller Torrey, "Hidden Memories" by Robert Baker, and "Courage to Heal" by Bass and Davis, noting that while "Courage to Heal" is considered the 'bible of the incest recovery movement,' parents often find it helpful for understanding their children's behavior.
Ethics of Therapy
A section titled 'A question of ethics' addresses concerns about therapists who, after diagnosing incest, may push clients towards lawsuits as part of recovery, potentially for financial gain. It directs readers to the Ethics Committee of the American Psychological Association for further inquiry.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The overarching theme of the newsletter is the critical examination of recovered memories, particularly those of childhood sexual abuse. The FMS Foundation adopts a stance that questions the accuracy and origin of such memories, emphasizing the potential for reconstruction and misinterpretation within therapeutic contexts. The editorial stance is one of skepticism towards the concept of 'repressed memories' as a defense mechanism and a concern for the devastating impact false accusations can have on families. The foundation positions itself as a source of information and support for families affected by these issues, advocating for a balanced perspective and a thorough understanding of memory's complexities. They also highlight the need for ethical practices within the mental health profession.
Just because someone recovers vivid memories of abuse by space aliens does not mean that space aliens have invaded our planet. Just because someone recovers vivid memories of past lives does not establish the reality of such lives. Just because someone recovers memories of abuse during some sort of therapy does not mean that it really happened.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is False Memory Syndrome?
False Memory Syndrome is a phenomenon where individuals develop memories of events that may not have actually occurred, often influenced by therapy or suggestion. These memories are reconstructed and reinterpreted rather than being stored like factual data.
How does the FMS Foundation address accusations of abuse?
The FMS Foundation documents stories from individuals who have recovered memories, and from families of the accused. They state they do not verify stories but aim to provide a forum for discussion and to highlight that there are often two sides to accusations.
What is the Foundation's stance on repressed memories?
The Foundation questions the theory of repressed memories, particularly in the context of trauma. They raise concerns about why repressed memories are not reported from events like the Holocaust, and point to recovered memories of less plausible events like alien abuse or past lives as questions that any theory of repression must account for.
What are the concerns regarding child sexual abuse statistics?
The newsletter expresses skepticism about the wide range of statistics reported for child sexual abuse, suggesting that some figures are inflated or based on questionable definitions, contributing to hysteria rather than addressing the problem.
In This Issue
People Mentioned
- Pamela
- E. Fuller Torrey, M.D.Author
- Robert BakerAuthor
- Bass and DavisAuthors
Organisations
- FMS Foundation
- WWOR news
- Sally Jessy Raphael show
- Kansas City Star
- Los Angeles Times
- Philadelphia Inquirer
- Toronto Star
- Miami Herald
- Utah County Journal
- Cleveland Plain Dealer
- New York Times
- National Committee for the Prevention of Child Abuse
- Department of Health and Human Services
- San Diego Grand Jury
- +2 more
Locations
- United States, United States
- Canada, Canada
- Salt Lake City, United States
- Oklahoma City, United States
- Arizona, United States
- Toronto, Canada