Enigma - No 21

Magazine Overview

Title: The Original ENIGMA
Issue: 21
Publisher: The Independent Research Centre for Unexplained Phenomena
Date: August 2000 (inferred from content)
Price: £2.00

This issue of The Original ENIGMA delves into the complexities of the 2000 crop circle season, addressing both the geometrical intricacies of formations and the ongoing debate surrounding their origins. The editorial apologizes for the late arrival of the issue due to technical problems but assures readers of future punctuality. It highlights the hectic nature of the 2000 season, marked by extensive research, analysis, and significant controversy, particularly concerning Colin Andrews' assertion that 80% of investigated crop circles were hoaxed.

Editorial

The editorial sets a tone of critical inquiry, emphasizing that the debate should focus on the 20% of unexplained formations rather than getting bogged down in statistics about hoaxing. It uses the analogy of not discarding all £20 notes because some are fake, advocating for the continued research of even a single genuine formation. The author encourages readers to research evidence, conduct their own experiments, and maintain an open mind, suggesting that there is still much unknown about the phenomenon.

Contents

• The issue features several key articles:
• Crop Circles from the 2000 season: Some geometrical analysis (Pages 3-15)
• Statement by Colin Andrews (Pages 16-18)
• 80% Controversy, 20% Mystery (Pages 19-26), featuring Paul Vigay's discussion of Colin Andrews' statement.

Crop Circles from the 2000 Season: Some Geometrical Analysis by Paul Vigay

Paul Vigay's article provides a detailed examination of crop formations from the 2000 season. He notes the season's intensity, with impressive designs and media attention following Colin Andrews' statement. Vigay mentions rumors of up to nine hoaxing teams operating in Wiltshire alone but states his preference for direct field research over claims and counter-claims.

West Stowell Formation (uk00bw)

Vigay describes an impressive formation discovered on July 22, 2000, near Avebury Trusloe, Wiltshire. This formation, approximately 180 feet in diameter, was based on six-fold geometry, with five vesica pisces curves. However, the sixth section was incomplete or different. The formation exhibited unusual anomalies, including a strong radio interference pattern at 1500MHz, similar to that found in the 1996 East Field 'DNA' formation, and a noticeable polarization effect on liquid crystal displays (LCDs), where screens would darken when oriented along the crop lay.

Analysis using digital geometrical software revealed inaccuracies in the formation's construction when compared to a pure 'Flower of Life' pattern, suggesting it might be man-made. Despite this, the detected RF and LCD anomalies were undeniable.

Vigay also discusses another formation near Avebury Trusloe, described as resembling a magnetic field pattern. This formation, approximately 180 feet in diameter, was constructed using straight lines, creating an optical illusion of curves. Ground inspection revealed the use of straight lines, not curves. The team, including Cathy Smiles and Freddy Silva, experienced positive dowsable effects and a momentary increase in RF frequency. Vigay speculates that 'circle-makers' might be attracted to locations with existing geographical anomalies or 'Earth Grid' energy points.

Cherhill Formation, 2000 (uk00dn)

This formation, dated to August 5-6, 2000, is based on 11-fold geometry and is compared to the Avebury Trusloe formation. The survey team, including Vigay, Smiles, and Silva, detected anomalies, including an energy line passing through the formation and a possible link to nearby radio masts. Freddy Silva found the formation's energy to be negative. Cathy Smiles sensed a connection to the West Stowell formation. Vigay conducted electromagnetic monitoring and found an area of strong radio interference near the eastern edge, approximately 4 feet wide, with two thin paths of flattened stalks leading away. Further investigation revealed a specific signal at 1500.0000MHz, pointing towards radio masts about two miles southwest, suggesting a precise signal possibly from military calibration.

Construction Analysis

Vigay provides a step-by-step geometrical breakdown of how the Cherhill formation might have been constructed, involving plotting points on a circle and connecting them with straight lines. He notes that the design is less elaborate than the Avebury Trusloe formation but suggests a possible link. The analysis of the West Stowell formation also included a detailed geometrical breakdown, illustrating how the design could be plotted using overlapping circles and straight lines, with inaccuracies in the perimeter points potentially indicating human construction.

Statement by Colin Andrews

Colin Andrews presents a formal statement detailing his findings on magnetic signatures in crop circles and his conclusions regarding man-made creations.

Findings of a Magnetic Signature in Some Crop Circles

Andrews has been measuring the Earth's magnetic field around crop circles for four years, initiated by reports of anomalous magnetic phenomena. His magnetometer surveys, including complex and simple patterns, revealed a distinct magnetic signature in simple circles and basic geometric patterns. This signature involves an increased magnetic reading that replicates the crop pattern's design but is offset by 3-5 degrees clockwise. He theorizes this could be a natural mechanism or a residual magnetic effect, potentially creating an electric current that affects the plants, though the cause of the magnetic flux remains unknown.

The Level of Man-Made Creations

Andrews discusses the increasing level of man-made crop circles. He recounts being shown privileged information in the mid-1990s by a BBC journalist who had investigated hoaxers Dave Chorley and Doug Bowers. This information included letters and filmed evidence of hoaxing. He also mentions being shown a video of a formation at Oliver's Castle allegedly made by balls of light, which, upon investigation with a private detective, was proven to be a hoax. His research since 1999 has included detective work, site inspections, and information from various sources, leading him to conclude that approximately 80% of crop circles are man-made.

He asserts that 20% of formations show no evidence of human involvement, and a handful of these also display the magnetic signature. Andrews notes that filmed evidence of hoaxes will be featured in upcoming media productions. He emphasizes that no evidence of human involvement was found in 20% of the formations investigated in the UK.

Announcement and Response

Andrews explains that his announcement on August 9th, 2000, generated significant excitement and interest from scientists globally. He received criticism for releasing magnetic results before full scientific input but intended to provide the research community an opportunity to provide feedback. He feels a responsibility, having been a prominent voice in the subject for 17 years, to ensure truthfulness. He believes his findings will bring an honest perspective to the subject, which has impacted governments, scientists, and various cultural groups. He concludes by stating that the research has revealed more interesting directions for investigation.

80% Controversy, 20% Mystery (Paul Vigay)

Paul Vigay discusses the implications of Colin Andrews' statement, acknowledging it as the most controversial topic of the 2000 season. He argues that focusing on the numerical split (80% hoaxed, 20% unexplained) misses the fundamental point: a genuine mystery persists. Vigay uses the analogy of £20 notes, stating that the existence of forgeries doesn't invalidate genuine currency. He emphasizes that even a single genuine formation warrants continued research. He notes that his database contains over 2000 formations, making the percentage of genuine ones potentially very low (around 0.05%), but believes the actual percentage is likely higher. Vigay suggests that hoaxers and skeptics prefer to argue semantics rather than confront the implications of the unexplained formations.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the geometrical analysis of crop circles, the ongoing debate about their origin (man-made vs. natural/unexplained), and the investigation of physical and electromagnetic anomalies. The editorial stance, and that of Paul Vigay, is to encourage critical thinking, evidence-based research, and an open mind, emphasizing the importance of the unexplained phenomena despite the prevalence of hoaxes. Colin Andrews' stance is to present his findings on magnetic signatures and the high rate of hoaxing as a factual basis for future research, urging others to investigate hoaxing themselves. The magazine advocates for rigorous scientific inquiry into the unexplained aspects of crop circles.

Title: Enigma
Issue: 1
Volume: 1
Date: 1992 (issue 1)
Publisher: Enigma Publications
Country: England
Language: English

This issue of Enigma magazine, published in 1992, delves into the controversial subject of crop circles, exploring various theories, research findings, and public perceptions. The magazine aims to present a more rational and scientific approach to the phenomenon, distinguishing it from sensationalized media portrayals and the activities of some self-proclaimed researchers.

The Politics and Perils of Crop Circle Research

The opening section addresses the political infighting and petty arguments that plague the fringes of crop circle research. The author expresses concern that some individuals have a vested interest in keeping the subject mysterious, profiting from merchandise without engaging in genuine research. A strong critique is leveled against 'charlatans' and 'evangelical preachers' who, through their zealous promotion of 'genuine' formations, alienate the public and make genuine research appear like a 'New Age' eccentricity. The author argues that until researchers are portrayed as scientific and rational, public opinion will remain skeptical, viewing crop circles as mere hoaxes. Progress in understanding the subject is hindered by researchers who refuse to consider evidence that challenges their own 'pet theories'.

The author commends Colin Andrews for his honesty in announcing findings that would likely cause controversy. While not agreeing with all of Andrews' conclusions, the author acknowledges his extensive ground research, spanning nearly 20 years, in seeking the truth behind crop formations. Andrews and Pat Delgado's 1989 book, "Circular Evidence," is mentioned as a significant investigative work that brought them to prominence as 'experts' sought by the media.

The article also touches upon the potential involvement of British Intelligence services, noting the army's historical interest and the use of taxpayer money for helicopter reconnaissance flights over crop formations. A concerning incident is cited where a military helicopter allegedly harassed a 'circle watcher,' raising questions about the safety of low-level flying over public areas.

In the echelons of power, there's a tendency to suppress or ridicule anything that challenges 'established thinking' and 'orthodox science.' When a phenomenon is too public to be covered up, the strategy shifts to ridicule or manipulation of public opinion to deem it irrelevant. The author posits that the best way to hide truth is to conceal it between two lies, creating confusion and argument to distract from the real issue. Crop circle research is presented as a prime example of this tactic.

Evangelical believers criticized Colin Andrews for his announcement about the extent of hoaxing without providing irrefutable evidence or percentages. Conversely, hard-core skeptics dismissed him as a believer for not stating that *all* crop circles were hoaxed. The author clarifies that Andrews' announcement specifically applied to circles investigated in 1999 and 2000, not all circles throughout history. Based on personal research, the author finds Andrews' conclusion to be accurate, even if some 'believers' are unwilling to accept the evidence.

However, the author cautions against extrapolating this percentage to formations before 1999 or future ones, suggesting that the ratio of hoaxed to genuine formations fluctuates based on media and public interest. Years with less publicity see continued research into anomalies, while increased interest prompts hoaxers to create more elaborate displays or reconstructions.

Errors and Mistakes in Crop Formations

The issue highlights the year 2000 as a period where numerous errors in construction were observed in crop formations. This sloppiness or boredom among hoaxers is presented as further evidence of the extent of hoaxing. The author dismisses the idea that these obvious mistakes might be riddles from 'genuine circle makers,' maintaining that the elegant and sacred geometry embedded in genuine formations would not be found in amateurish hoaxes.

Genuine Anomalies and Magnetic Fields

Despite the prevalence of hoaxes, the magazine explores genuine anomalies. Colin Andrews' findings of magnetic anomalies within formations are discussed. The author notes that the media often muddied the waters, misinterpreting Andrews' findings as rotations relative to an external origin rather than the formation itself. The author, who has been researching electromagnetic and radio frequency (RF) anomalies since 1991, finds Andrews' study of the Earth's Magnetic field particularly interesting. Andrews' four-year study indicated a rotation of the magnetic field pattern in relation to the crop circle design, typically around 2.5° to 3° about the formation's center.

Vortex Theory and Harmonic Resonance

The article delves into the concept of a 'vortex effect' as a potential cause for crop formations, citing the BLT Research Team Inc. and Terence Meaden's vortex theory. The author's own theory suggests a 'hyper-dimensional vortex' created by an unknown entity, rather than a meteorological event. This is visualized as a three-dimensional vortex passing through our dimension, akin to water spiraling down a plug hole or the wake of a speedboat.

The author's personal experiments, conducted with Freddy Silva, indicate a scientific basis for dowsing. When dowsing rods swing outwards, a momentary increase in background frequency is detected, mirroring the dowsing reaction. Measurements have revealed rings surrounding formations, not just the obvious radii of the component circles. Coupled with RF anomalies, this suggests that whatever creates crop circles also creates a temporary vortex in the localized space/time continuum.

This vortex effect is likened to the ripples seen when a Stargate is activated in the TV series 'Stargate SG1.' The author's theory, first speculated in 1992, posits that crop circle designs are based on higher dimensional shapes.

Further exploration into harmonic resonance suggests that everything in the universe is linked via harmonic resonances and vibrations. The author proposes that our reactions to subtle energy fields, including those in crop circles, are influenced by the interaction of external harmonics with our own vibrational levels. This can explain why people have different reactions (feeling elated or unwell) to the same formation. The author believes that understanding these interactions could lead to new methods for curing illness and disease, which is the focus of ongoing research projects.

Editorial Stance and Subscription Information

The magazine's editorial details reveal that Enigma is edited by Paul Vigay, based in Southsea, Hampshire, England. The publication is available on subscription and also offers a quantity discount for clubs and shops. The magazine is also accessible online via its website, www.cropcircleresearch.com.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of Enigma are the critical examination of crop circle research, the distinction between genuine phenomena and hoaxes, the scientific investigation of anomalies (particularly electromagnetic and magnetic), and the exploration of theoretical explanations such as vortex effects and harmonic resonance. The editorial stance is one of promoting rational, scientific inquiry, challenging sensationalism, and encouraging a deeper understanding of the underlying principles behind crop circles, with a view towards potential applications in healing and understanding human consciousness.