Eight Martinis - No 07

Magazine Overview

*eight martinis is a quarterly magazine dedicated to the state of the art of Remote Viewing (RV). Issue 7, published in May 2012, offers a comprehensive exploration of RV, featuring interviews, personal experiences, technical discussions on protocols, and historical case studies.

Key Features and Articles

Interview with "Viewer 001", Joe McMoneagle

The issue prominently features an interview with Joe McMoneagle, identified as "Viewer 001." McMoneagle discusses the nature of "eight-martini" results, a term used within the intelligence community for exceptionally accurate remote viewing data. He also provides insights into the adaptability and the importance of established protocols in RV, stating that while protocols can evolve, those proven sound over time are essential to prevent fraud and ensure reliability.

The Remote Viewing Protocols

Several articles address the critical topic of Remote Viewing protocols. Daz Smith, Lyn Buchanan, and PJ Gaenir contribute to "RV Protocols - Part 1," while Joe McMoneagle continues the discussion in "RV Protocols - Part 2." These articles highlight the balance between protocol flexibility and the need for rigorous, tested methodologies to maintain the integrity of RV data.

Personal Journeys and Experiences

"I Like the Way You Think: Remote Viewing as a Path to Falling in Love with the Subconscious Mind" by Lauren Kott

Lauren Kott shares a deeply personal perspective on her relationship with her subconscious mind through the practice of remote viewing. She likens RV to a car that facilitates a journey into the mind, emphasizing the profound, almost romantic, connection that develops. Kott describes how understanding and trusting her subconscious has enriched her life beyond the practice of RV itself, leading to a deeper appreciation of her own capabilities and a more meaningful experience of the world. She suggests that acknowledging the spiritual and emotional contributions of the subconscious is vital, moving beyond purely scientific or detached views.

"My Experiences With Telepathy And Clairvoyance Before They Were Called Remote Viewing" by Jean Millay, PhD

Jean Millay recounts her early experiences with psychic phenomena from 1967 to the present. She details her involvement with ESP research, brainwave biofeedback, and the development of her "Stereo Brainwave Biofeedback Light Sculpture" (SBBLS). Millay describes her work with notable figures like Stanley Krippner, Russell Targ, and Uri Geller, and her research into telepathic communication and EEG phase coherence. She highlights a significant finding: couples with better EEG phase coherence also achieved better telepathy scores, suggesting a strong correlation between synchronized brainwaves and psychic ability. Millay also touches upon her personal journey, including a dream that led to the creation of the SBBLS and her subsequent career in parapsychology.

Historical UFO Sighting

"What Was That Thing in the Sky Over Oakland, California in November 1896?" by Jon Knowles

This article revisits a historical UFO sighting from November 1896 in Oakland, California, exploring the event through the lens of remote viewing. It presents a case study that likely aims to demonstrate the application of RV techniques to investigate unexplained phenomena.

Memorial to Dan Chevalier

The issue includes a heartfelt tribute to Dan Chevalier, described as a CRVer, Colleague, and Friend. Several individuals, including Lyn Buchanan, Coleen Marenich, Lori and Jim, John Taylor, and Daz Smith, share their memories of Dan. They remember him as a dedicated, intelligent, and caring individual who was a significant driver in bringing people together in the RV community. His passion for RV, his resourcefulness, and his unwavering commitment to his family and friends are highlighted. The tributes emphasize his positive impact and the void his passing leaves.

Other Contributions

"Viewing Through Flash Bang" by Teresa Frisch

This article likely explores techniques or experiences related to viewing under challenging or high-stress conditions, as suggested by the title.

RV Notice Board and Contacts

The issue concludes with an "RV Notice Board" and a list of "Remote Viewing Contacts/Websites," serving as a resource for readers interested in further engagement with the RV community and its activities.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the practice, theory, and community of Remote Viewing. There is a strong emphasis on the importance of protocols, the personal and spiritual dimensions of RV, and the exploration of both contemporary and historical phenomena. The editorial stance, as expressed by Daz Smith, encourages readers to engage with RV through consistent practice and to appreciate its potential for personal growth and understanding. The magazine aims to be a platform for sharing insights, experiences, and information within the RV field, fostering a sense of community and advancing the understanding of this discipline.

This issue of 'eight martinis' (Volume 1, Issue 11, 1997) focuses heavily on the field of remote viewing (RV), featuring an extensive interview with Joe McMoneagle, widely known as 'Viewer #001'. The magazine also includes articles on an intercontinental remote viewing experiment, a spiritual encounter with an Abinticua Mamu, and discussions on the scientific and psychological aspects of RV.

Intercontinental Remote Viewing Experiment

The issue begins by detailing an ambitious intercontinental remote viewing experiment conducted simultaneously in Bogotá, Colombia; Estes Park, Colorado; and near Carlin, Nevada, with a participant in Santa Rosa, California. The experiment aimed to send a message across vast distances by tuning into Earth's frequencies. Participants in Estes Park used the I Ching to determine the message, which was interpreted as 'Fire over Mountain,' the hexagram for 'The Wanderer.' Artist James Dowlen in California was tasked with drawing the images that came to him during the session, producing remarkable results that included elements from all three locations, such as Rolling Thunder's eagle symbol and the trigrams. Dr. Andrew Weil and Dr. Lee Sannella were among the 'receivers' in Bogotá.

Encounter with the Abinticua Mamu

The author recounts a significant experience visiting the Abinticua Mamu (medicine man) in his village. The Mamu, whose name Seucuicui means 'bearer of the light,' offered profound insights into the causes of modern civilization's diseases, attributing schizophrenia to paving the ground with cement, heart trouble to a loss of love for the Earth, and cancer to the civilization itself becoming a cancer on the Earth. He emphasized the distinct roles of different races on Earth, with some tasked with praying to the Earth to maintain balance, while others, like humanity, were rapidly unbalancing it with arrogant technology. The Mamu's message about respecting the land and not imposing human magic on it was delivered powerfully, even causing a jeep to stop due to vapor lock, symbolizing the land's resistance.

Interview with Joe McMoneagle: The Science and Practice of Remote Viewing

The core of the issue is a comprehensive interview with Joe McMoneagle, a veteran of remote viewing with over 42 years of experience. McMoneagle, a retired US Army Chief Warrant Officer and author, discusses various facets of RV.

Viewer Development and Training

McMoneagle outlines his ideal curriculum for a remote viewing university, emphasizing psychological stability tests, entrance exams to gauge psi ability and willingness to adapt, and the importance of checking one's ego. He stresses that RV training is not about learning new techniques but rather unlearning bad habits and developing mental toughness. He advocates for a full-time commitment, akin to an immersion school, and highlights the necessity of understanding the history and protocols of RV, warning against the oversimplification often found online.

The Role of Art and Sketching

McMoneagle, known for his detailed sketches, discusses how his artistic background, nurtured since childhood, aids his RV work. He explains that while artistic talent isn't strictly necessary, it can help viewers translate the 'fribbits' (small pieces of information) into coherent images. He emphasizes that the goal is to convey the information, regardless of artistic skill.

Scientific Protocols and Blind Targeting

A significant portion of the interview is dedicated to the importance of scientific protocols in RV. McMoneagle strongly advocates for blind targeting, where the viewer has no prior knowledge of the target. He argues that this is fundamental to distinguishing RV from mere psychic ability and ensures the integrity of the data. He also discusses the role of feedback, noting it's not always necessary except in training scenarios, and criticizes the practice of 'front-loading' information, which compromises the integrity of the RV process.

Teamwork and Responsibilities

McMoneagle discusses the value of teamwork in RV projects, cautioning that consensus is not the goal, as viewers may receive different interpretations. He emphasizes the importance of a peer group for support and for challenging one's own beliefs. He also touches upon the responsibilities of remote viewers to respect the field's history and pioneers, and to stay true to the scientific protocols that define RV. He critiques organizations that focus on narrow aspects of RV and those that spread misinformation.

The Science of Remote Viewing

McMoneagle expresses his deep interest in understanding how information is transferred and how humans gain knowledge before others. He highlights his involvement with the Parapsychological Association and his extensive research experience at SRI-International and Science Applications International Corporation. He recommends studying the history of RV research and joining organizations like the PA to gain a comprehensive understanding. He also mentions the need for resources to publish numerous unwritten studies.

Independence and RV Methodologies

McMoneagle explains his independent stance from many RV organizations, attributing it to a belief that many have strayed from the original principles and have created overly complex methodologies (e.g., ARV, CRV, ERV) that obscure the fundamental nature of RV. He asserts that all humans are psychic to varying degrees, determined by natural talent and effort, and that beyond this, much of what is presented is 'eye wash.' He maintains that his own methods have not changed significantly over time, relying on what his mind dictates.

Parapsychology Classes Cancelled

The issue briefly notes the cancellation of parapsychology classes in public schools, attributing it to Carl Sagan's pronouncements labeling parapsychology as pseudoscience, which led to a backlash against the field.

Publications and Future Directions

Dr. Jean Millay is highlighted as the editor of 'RADIANT MINDS: Scientists Explore the Dimensions of Consciousness,' a revised and updated version of a previous book on parapsychology research. McMoneagle also mentions his own publications and his belief that the Star Gate program made RV seem easier than it is. He expresses a desire to see the groundwork laid for the future of RV, emphasizing the need for continued research and a focus on understanding the core principles.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the integrity of remote viewing as a scientific discipline, the importance of rigorous training and adherence to protocols, and the critique of misinformation and oversimplification within the RV community. The editorial stance, largely conveyed through Joe McMoneagle's interview, champions a disciplined, scientifically-grounded approach to remote viewing, emphasizing mental toughness, blind targeting, and a deep respect for the field's history and foundational principles. There is a clear skepticism towards commercialized or diluted versions of RV that deviate from its core tenets.

This issue of 'eight martinis' focuses on the fundamental principles and protocols of Remote Viewing (RV), featuring in-depth discussions with key figures in the field. The magazine explores the nuances of RV protocols, their historical development, and their practical application.

Joe McMoneagle on Remote Viewing

Joe McMoneagle shares his experiences and insights into remote viewing. He emphasizes that remote viewing has not changed the nature of spontaneous psi occurrences for him, but he generally does not discuss them unless they are significant and can be shared with appropriate authorities. He states that there are no scary targets, with the most rewarding experiences being finding missing children alive, and the worst being finding them deceased or being too late. He views targeting aliens and UFOs as a waste of time, though he has participated in crash site explorations with interesting findings. McMoneagle has also targeted off-planet locations like the Moon and Mars, describing what appear to be ruins on Mars and artifacts on the Moon, though he lacks immediate means for verification. He stresses that INTENT and EXPECTATION FOR OUTCOME are the driving forces behind targeting, highlighting the importance of focus and attention in shaping reality. He believes the closure of the Star Gate FOIA documents was due to years of bad management, poor facilitation, in-fighting, and a need to ridicule the operation, rather than a lack of worth. He notes that the released FOIA documents represent only a small fraction of the project files.

McMoneagle feels the closure of the project has freed individuals to pursue their own work, though research funding has become more challenging. He laments the rise of unqualified individuals claiming expertise in remote viewing. He describes the current revenue-generating circus of RV training and products as denigrating to the field. He believes funding for RV research has remained consistent, with much of the work now happening overseas, like in Budapest, and that current experiments are more enriching, focusing on the human effect on the paranormal. For personal relaxation, he enjoys reading, science fiction films, classical or 1950s rock music, and the color cobalt blue.

He advises the next generation of remote viewers to be open-minded, to research thoroughly, and to avoid being didactic. He encourages enjoying RV for its intrinsic value and using it to help people and explore the unknown, always verifying data.

Daz Smith on Remote Viewing Protocols

Daz Smith, the creator of the magazine, discusses his adherence to the SRI experimental Remote Viewing protocols, which he believes are comprehensive and effective for all situations encountered over his fourteen years of experience. He cautions against altering or diluting these protocols. Smith categorizes RV protocols into three classes developed during the military program: Class C (Training RV), Class B (Evaluation/Confirmation RV), and Class A (Operational RV).

• Class C (Training RV): Involves a knowledgeable monitor, non-blind conditions, and intrasession feedback for learning. Results are not proof-of-principle due to cueing possibilities, and evaluation focuses on performance curves.
• Class B (Evaluation/Confirmation RV): Requires the viewer and monitor to be blind to the site, with feedback given only post-session. Statistical techniques are used for accuracy assessment.
• Class A (Operational RV): The monitor is usually blind, with occasional non-blind analysts. Feedback conditions are variable, and evaluation techniques are user-determined.

Smith emphasizes that for "proof of psychic functioning remote viewing," the target must be double-blind, with no one knowing the target present, and strict adherence to all protocols is necessary. He advocates for clear disclosure of project formats (blinding, feedback) when publishing RV work to build upon past achievements and avoid a "murky road" of protocol erosion.

Lyn Buchanan on Remote Viewing Protocols

Lyn Buchanan views RV protocols as a means of communicating with the subconscious mind, likening them to a car that facilitates a journey rather than being the destination itself. He advises viewers to first master proven protocols before attempting modifications, stressing that while protocols are situational, they have been refined over decades and thousands of target situations. He believes that while static rules exist, they are adaptable to situational needs. Buchanan asserts that the protocols developed by the U.S. military and SRI were rigorously tested and honed over time, and he cautions against individuals creating their own rules, especially for commercial gain, without first understanding the established methods. He explains that in teaching, he focuses on training good monitoring and viewer habits, with feedback used to reinforce correct procedures and analyze mistakes, emphasizing that "success breeds success" for the student.

Buchanan clarifies that for operational RV, especially in time-sensitive situations like missing persons cases, protocols can be adapted. He notes that feedback conditions vary based on client requirements, and evaluation techniques should be standardized for consistent data collection and viewer assessment. He disagrees with the notion that evaluation techniques are user-determined, advocating for standardization.

PJ Gaenir on Remote Viewing Protocols

PJ Gaenir states that RV protocols are scientifically defined and have evolved over time, with the primary requirements being proper double-blinding and feedback for confirmation. He acknowledges the public's confusion and debate surrounding RV terms, particularly online, but asserts that these discussions do not alter the scientific definition of RV protocols. Gaenir emphasizes that the protocols are not just about the viewing process itself but also encompass monitoring, analysis, report writing, and customer interaction. He believes that the public's misunderstanding stems from the conflation of psi methodologies with RV protocols, leading to a misrepresentation of the field and potentially "Anti-RV" practices. He stresses the importance of viewer integrity and honesty in presenting their work and adhering to established protocols.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the critical importance of adhering to established Remote Viewing protocols for the integrity, validity, and advancement of the field. The contributors consistently emphasize that protocols are not arbitrary rules but scientifically developed methodologies that ensure reliable data collection and accurate assessment. There is a shared concern about the proliferation of unqualified individuals and the misrepresentation of RV, particularly in the commercial sphere. The magazine's stance appears to be in favor of rigorous, scientifically-grounded remote viewing practices, advocating for transparency, education, and a return to the foundational principles that have guided the field for decades.

This issue of 'eight martinis' (Volume 8, Issue 31) focuses on the critical definition and application of Remote Viewing (RV) protocols. The cover headline, "Remote Viewing is? PROTOCOLS," and the subtitle, "The Defining Principles of Remote Viewing" by Joe McMoneagle, set the stage for an in-depth examination of what constitutes legitimate RV. The magazine argues that the field has suffered significantly from disinformation and a "re-definition" of terms, which has confused the public and undermined the practice.

The Problem of Re-Definition and Disinformation

The article posits that much of the harm to RV's reputation and public understanding over the last 15 years stems from the re-labeling of RV protocols as mere "psychic methods." This strategy, it is argued, functions as a form of disinformation by proxy, displacing the legitimate protocols and making it difficult for the public to discern genuine RV. The author notes that this pattern is not new, drawing a parallel to the alternative medicine field where a discovered healing plant might be overshadowed by commercially marketed, related but inferior supplements, and where laws are enacted to restrict access to the original.

The confusion, it is explained, started with the re-definition of RV terminology "for the public" by former US intelligence agents and those influenced by them. This subtle shift in meaning is described as a destructive assault on the primary meaning and definition of RV. The issue highlights that while science maintains clear terminology, the layman's field has lost definition, often due to indoctrination.

Defining Remote Viewing and its Protocols

The core of the issue lies in defining what RV and its protocols truly are. According to the text, a "controlled, communicated and secured" psychic effort, performed within a "science-defined" Remote Viewing protocol (rules/controls), with a successful measured result (matching target definition, session, and feedback), qualifies as "remote viewing." The "controlled" aspect refers to the viewer's psi methodology, while the RV protocols are the rules, including blinding and feedback. The article stresses that if a session does not result in a match, it is not a remote viewing, but rather an "attempted remote viewing."

Key Protocol Elements

Remote Viewing protocols are described as science-based rules designed to facilitate a successful psychic event on an intended target under controlled conditions. These rules are essential for differentiating between psychic phenomena and actual Remote Viewing. Key elements include:

• Blinding: The remote viewer must always be completely blind to the target. Anyone interacting with the viewer during the session must also be blind to the target. Even if others in the room know the target, the viewer must remain blind to this information for as long as possible.
• Controlled Psi: The viewer manages their personal process during the psychic session.
• Feedback: Essential for confirming a successful match between the target and the session's outcome.

The article emphasizes that these protocols are not suggestions but requirements. Violations, even with excuses, mean the work is not within accepted RV protocols.

The Impact of Protocols on Viewers

Legitimate RV is described as psychologically destabilizing, requiring viewers to be adaptable to navigate the challenges to their fundamental constructs of reality, time, and identity. The process can involve ego turbulence, irrationality, and cognitive dissonance. However, the article suggests that people who are "not psychologically ready" are not the only ones who experience problems; rather, it's that some people lack the necessary "adaptation" ability. For "logical" personalities, RV protocols provide permission to engage in psychic experiences, but they may then seek validation by insisting their experiences be labeled as RV, even if they don't strictly adhere to protocols.

Debating and Communication

The issue addresses the ongoing debates within the RV community, particularly online, regarding protocol adherence. The author advocates for "integrity of communication," urging people to be honest and straightforward about the protocols used when presenting their work. The simplicity and clarity of RV protocols are highlighted as refreshing compared to the complexity of the individual brain-on-target interaction. Resources like TKR and books by Joe McMoneagle are recommended for those seeking guidance.

Science History and Current Practices

The article touches upon the history of RV protocols, mentioning their evolution within science labs and the work of parapsychologists like Drs. Jessica Utts, Edwin May, Dean Radin, and Charles Tart. It notes that current best practices are updates based on scientific learning, not contradictions of past methods. The distinction between "RV training protocols" and actual Remote Viewing is made clear: training focuses on methods, while RV is the event itself, contingent on successful protocol adherence and outcome.

Opinions and the Future of RV

The author shares personal opinions, distinguishing them from actual RV. While acknowledging that some flexibility might exist in certain situations (e.g., non-specific tasking), the core requirements of blinding and protocol integrity remain paramount. The piece criticizes the extremist mentality that dismisses anything not strictly RV, advocating instead for clear communication about what is and isn't RV. The future of the field, it suggests, depends on honest communication and a shared focus on what is good and scientifically sound.

Key Figures and Resources

The issue features contributions and mentions of several key figures in the RV field, including Daz Smith (designer and remote viewer), Lyn Buchanan (former military remote viewer), Palyne "PJ" Gaenir (Dojo Psi founder), Joe McMoneagle (RV pioneer), Ingo Swann, and scientists like Edwin May, Dean Radin, Charles Tart, and Jessica Utts. It also provides links to relevant websites and papers for further study.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical importance of scientific protocols in Remote Viewing, the detrimental impact of disinformation and misdefinition on the field, and the necessity of integrity and clear communication among practitioners. The editorial stance strongly advocates for adherence to established RV protocols, particularly blinding and controlled conditions, as the defining characteristics of legitimate Remote Viewing. It argues that while other psychic experiences may hold value, they should not be mislabeled as RV. The author emphasizes that the goal should be to develop skilled viewers through rigorous methodology, rather than to dilute the definition of RV for convenience or commercial gain.

This issue of 'eight martinis' features several articles and discussions related to remote viewing (RV) and anomalous phenomena, with a prominent focus on a historical UFO sighting. The magazine includes discussions on RV protocols, viewer experiences, and an in-depth analysis of a remote viewing project investigating the 1896 'mystery airship' sightings over Oakland, California.

Remote Viewing Protocols and Practice

The issue begins with a detailed discussion on remote viewing protocols, primarily referencing the work of 'Daz' and 'Joe'. The conversation clarifies the distinctions between different classes of RV protocols: Class C, where the monitor knows the target; Class B, which involves double-blind testing and statistical analysis; and Class A, used for operational purposes with variable feedback. The importance of maintaining protocol integrity, especially in double-blind testing, is emphasized to ensure the validity of results and prevent bias. Methodologies, such as using Hemi Sync sound support, are distinguished from protocols, highlighting that changes in methodology do not invalidate the protocol itself.

'Daz' explains SRI's three-tier structure for RV training, accommodating early learning and operational stages. However, a counterpoint is raised that there isn't a formal three-tiered structure at SRI, but rather that training scenarios often involve monitors knowing the target for learning purposes. True remote viewing, for collection, must be double-blind to the target, with no prior information given to the viewer. The discussion stresses the need for transparency in reporting RV projects, clearly stating the nature of the project, who was blind, how blind, and the feedback provided.

Joe McMoneagle Profile

A profile of Joe McMoneagle, CW2, US Army, Ret., CStS, highlights his extensive experience (42 years) in research and development, the paranormal, and social sciences. As Owner/Executive Director of Intuitive Intelligence Applications, Inc., he has supported multiple research facilities and corporations using Anomalous Cognition (AC). He has been a research associate with The Laboratories for Fundamental Research and provided consulting to SRI-International and Science Applications International Corporation, participating in protocol design and R&D evaluations for Project STAR GATE. McMoneagle is a member of several professional organizations, including The Parapsychological Association.

The 1896 Oakland Airship Mystery

The lead article, 'What Was That Thing In The Sky Over Oakland, California in November 1896?' by Jon Knowles, investigates this historical event through remote viewing. Knowles tasked viewers to gain insight into the 'airship' flap that occurred in late 1896, predating the Wright brothers' flights. Hundreds of sightings were reported in newspapers across the country. The remote viewing project involved 15 sessions on 4 targets, with viewers given only an administrative phrase and an 8-digit number. The majority of the data indicated an unusual object, likely a craft, though some 'minority report' data suggested a hoax. The viewers' sessions focused on a structure, a subject (an animated being), and intense energy, consistent with the phenomenon reported.

Witness accounts from Shelby Yost, William H. Ellis, and William J. Rodda are presented. Yost described the object as a 'blinding glow' from a 'strange bird with four rotor wings'. Ellis noted its effortless hovering and speed. Rodda initially thought it was a balloon with lights. Varying descriptions of the object's shape (egg-like, bird with four wings, balloon) and consistent reports of extreme brightness are noted. The article also references newspaper microfilm from the Oakland Public Library, which provided accounts from other witnesses, including the mayors of Oakland and San Francisco.

Remote Viewing Sessions Analysis

Detailed analyses of the remote viewing sessions are provided for the witnesses Yost, Rodda, and Ellis. For Shelby Yost's sighting, viewers Lapis and Bedivere described the structure as artificial, solid, firm, and slow, with Bedivere noting a 'vision-impairing structure' and potential 'hiding' or 'obscuring' elements. The subject was perceived as a tall, erect, functioning being, possibly masculine. Energy descriptions included a fall or descent. For William J. Rodda's sighting, viewers described a small, quiet, nonhuman subject with a 'void-like mentation' and a 'hard crusty-like environment'. Bedivere's session for Rodda included a 'ray' and a drawing of a sun-like structure shining a 'sunray-like light'.

Charles H. Ellis's sighting was also explored. Lapis described the structure as hard, tube-like, curved, and warm, with moving parts, possibly related to pilot's instruments. Bedivere suggested a 'surgical unit' and an 'abduction like scenario', noting a 'woman, an energy vampire' and 'silver suits'. The article notes that while some data might suggest a hoax or interdimensional phenomena, the coherence of multiple viewer sessions strongly supports the conclusion of a genuine, unusual aerial phenomenon.

Viewing Through Flash Bang

An article by Teresa Frisch, 'Viewing Through Flash Bang (Or better still, in spite of it)', discusses controlled remote viewing (CRV) training and practice. It emphasizes that the initial goal of training is not necessarily to get the target, but to develop the synergy between the subconscious and conscious minds. Post-session feedback ('mind candy') is crucial for building trust and refining accuracy. The article touches upon 'Operations Mode' where targets are unknown and feedback may be delayed or absent. It also references the protocols used in Project STAR GATE. The author describes 'Target of the Week Discussions' as learning opportunities, expanding through webinars. A specific discussion on a Uruguay BBQ event is mentioned, highlighting the importance of honest feedback and not 'waffling' when assessing subconscious perceptions.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the rigorous application and understanding of remote viewing protocols, the investigation of anomalous aerial phenomena (both historical and contemporary), and the challenges of interpreting subjective data. The editorial stance appears to favor a scientific and transparent approach to remote viewing, emphasizing the importance of double-blind conditions, clear reporting, and critical analysis of results. The historical investigation into the 1896 airship sightings, combined with modern remote viewing techniques, underscores a commitment to exploring unexplained events with a blend of historical research and cutting-edge methodology. The discussions on protocols highlight a concern for maintaining the integrity and credibility of the field.

Title: eight martinis
Issue: 51
Volume: 8
Date: May 2012

This issue of 'eight martinis' delves into the world of remote viewing, featuring a special segment on Joe McMoneagle and his practice session. It also explores a unique event in Uruguay and provides resources for those interested in learning more about remote viewing.

Joe McMoneagle Remote Viewing Session

The issue presents a "special inspirational treat" with a remote viewing session by Joe McMoneagle. He shares his experiences, insights, and clarifications, describing it as a privilege and pleasure. McMoneagle details a practice target, labeled #13, which was a photograph contained within a sealed envelope. The target was approximately two and a half years old and was part of a collection of 300 envelopes. He notes that while he has some prior knowledge of the photographs, he does not know what the numbers equate to. The final object viewed was the photograph within envelope 013, which was a practice target conducted on May 1st, 2012. The remote viewing results, presented as Page One and Page Two, were not altered. The RV notes describe the target as "COLD," "HARD," "THICK," "TALL," with "ANGULAR SIDES = FACETS?", "ROSY - PINK," a "MONSTROUS (SP?) MONUMENT," a "GIFT OF NATURE," "HEAVY," "STONE AOL. STONE LIKE," "BUT CRYSTALINE - FRACTURED," and "HARD/VERY HARD." The sketches depict a faceted object and a thrusting element. Page two of the RV notes further describes the object as "NATURAL," "MOTHER NATURE'S GIFT OR GIFT TO/BY MOTHER NATURE," with "FACETS. = DIAMOND? AOL," "ROCK AOL," "FUNDAMENTAL NATURAL STONE," "UNCHANGED STONE," "PRETTY STONE," and "CRAFTED STONE." The drawing on this page shows a stone symbol or sculpture, described as "JEWEL LIKE" and "NATURAL STONE OR CRYSTALINE SCULPTURE STANDING OUTSIDE."

The World's Largest Barbeque Cookout: Target 100609

The magazine discusses an event in Uruguay on April 3rd, which set a new Guinness World Record for the largest barbeque cookout. Over 1000 people gathered to cook 12 metric tonnes of fried beef on a mile-long grill, using six tonnes of charcoal. 20,000 spectators witnessed the event. The article highlights that Uruguay is a major exporter of beef and, significantly, kosher beef. It features insights from Rabbi Shemtov, who noted the surprise of people seeing a kosher stand at a non-Jewish event, and the meat industry's accommodation for kosher meat. The event was also attended by the Israeli Ambassador to Uruguay, His Excellency Mr. Yoel Barnea, and Rabbi Avraham Hager, a chief Rabbinical inspector of kosher meat. They initiated the event by placing the first steak on the grill. Moshe Ksakovitz managed a separate grill for the kosher meat, and brochures were distributed to educate attendees about kosher meat.

Remote Viewing Analysis and Viewer Perceptions

The article touches upon the analysis of remote viewing sessions, particularly Michelle's, whose session for Target 100609 included physical, tourist, and cultural perceptions. Michelle recorded recurring perceptions of a "strong male presence at the site, very influential male related to the target, Dali Lama, Gandhi, educational, reminded her of a temple as well as an amusement park." The author notes that Michelle did not claim it *was* a temple or amusement park, but that it reminded her of one. The structure built for the barbeque grill was indeed star-shaped. The author reflects on the importance of considering all perceptions, even those that might seem unusual for the target, as they can be crucial for the customer. The concept of "Consensus analysis" is mentioned, where perceptions not in agreement are left out, but the author emphasizes that this can lead to errors if important perceptions are discarded.

Controlled Remote Viewing (CRV) Methodology

The magazine explains that Controlled Remote Viewers are taught to review their sessions to distinguish between conscious mind pollution and subconscious mind reporting. Michelle's spiritual perceptions were included in her summary, and while they were not directly supported by feedback images, her structure and sketch were accurate. The author, identifying as a rookie CRV Analyst and Trainer, expresses a commitment to learning and minimizing mistakes. The difference between "waffle-ing, peacocking and door knobbing" is understood, as is the concept of consensus analysis. The article stresses that if a perception is not reported, it might not be answered, which is why the viewer worked the session. Michelle's blind tasking was to describe the event and/or location, and she maintained focus despite distractions, describing a quiet group within a busy event. Her perceptions included references to an influential male leader and military aspects, though the latter were not included in her summary. The article notes that remote viewing training involves overcoming mental attractors and diversions.

CRV Training and Resources

"Aesthetic Impact Informational Services, LLC" is introduced as an organization offering cross-disciplinary discussions, including topics like Magnetocardiograms, Biofields, Energy Medicine, and the Theory and Psychology of Remote Viewing. Teresa Frisch, a Registered Nurse and CRV Instructor/Trainer, is featured. She began her intuitive/psi experiences in 1992 and later studied CRV with Lyn Buchanan. Aesthetic Impact offers free webinars and resources on remote viewing. The magazine also lists various "RV WEBSITES," categorized into training and trainers, resources, targets, groups, and individuals, providing links to numerous websites and individuals in the field.

Notable Quotes and Citations

The issue includes a quote from Buchanan: "You're not going to believe what comes next!" Another significant quote is from Ingo Swann, featured on page 10, stating: "Remote Viewing is composed of a five part protocol, and when any one of the five parts are omitted (such as confirmatory feedback), then what has taken place is something other than remote viewing..... If these important definitional boundaries are not understood and maintained, the ultimate result will be ambiguous definitional quagmire of benefit to no one, and the demolition of what the remote viewing protocol achieved in terms of respect and repute." The article "- Fate article – On remote viewing UFOS and extraterrestrials" from September 1993 is cited.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around remote viewing as a methodology for intelligence gathering and personal exploration. The editorial stance appears to be one of promoting the practice of CRV, highlighting its structured protocol, the importance of accurate reporting, and the continuous learning process involved. There is an emphasis on the potential of intuition and subconscious mind reporting, alongside the need for rigorous analysis. The magazine also showcases real-world applications and events, such as the Uruguay barbeque, to illustrate the broader context in which these practices are applied. The inclusion of numerous websites and individuals dedicated to remote viewing suggests a commitment to fostering a community and providing resources for enthusiasts and practitioners.