Deguforum - Issue 07 - 1995

Magazine Overview

Title: DEGUFORUM
Issue: Nr. 7, 2. Jahrgang
Date: October 1995
Publisher: DEGUFO e.V. Deutschsprachige Gesellschaft für UFO-Forschung
Price: DM 7,50

This issue of DEGUFORUM delves deeply into the Roswell incident, featuring a critical analysis of the controversial Santilli film footage. It also explores broader themes of consciousness, the physical reality of UFOs, and includes several book reviews and discussions.

Editorial

The editorial, written by Hans-Joachim Heyer, reflects on the recent DEGUFO event "UFOs? - Here you will become thoughtful" and the subsequent creation of this issue. Heyer discusses the dual nature of DEGUFORUM – its intellectual content and its material existence, which incurs costs. He touches upon the financial necessity of events to support the organization's mission of raising awareness about UFOs. The editorial also addresses an internal conflict between Reinhard Nühlen (DEGUFO founder) and Michael Hesemann (editor of 'Magazin 2000'), framing it as a business dispute rather than a matter of truth. Heyer recounts the events leading to Hesemann's disruptive behavior at the DEGUFO event, which ultimately resulted in his removal by police. He then pivots to the theme of "disinformation," referencing a previous article and his own responses, and contemplates whether exposing such issues leads to greater harmony or polarization. The editorial concludes by highlighting the issue's diverse philosophical and narrative approaches to understanding our time.

Roswell: The Santilli Film and the Mogul Hypothesis

Was the Crashed Object in New Mexico in 1947 a Spy Balloon?

This article examines the Roswell incident and the recent surfacing of film reels, questioning the US Air Force's explanation involving the Mogul Project. It analyzes the quantitative comparison between the material quantity of a Mogul balloon and the reported debris. Independent researcher Karl Pflock's work suggests that the debris might have come from Flight 9, which used polyethylene balloons instead of neoprene, and speculates about radar reflectors. Major Jesse Marcel, an eyewitness, described the debris as unmanageable by hand or hammer and scattered over a wide area, indicating a direction of flight. The article presents an engineering approach by Robert A. Galganski to estimate the area covered by Mogul 9 balloons and compares it to the described debris field. Calculations based on witness testimonies and different debris distribution models (rectangular, parabolic, semi-elliptical) suggest that the amount of material from a single Mogul 9 balloon is insufficient to account for the reported debris, thus casting doubt on the Mogul Project explanation.

The Roswell-Material von Santilli - "The Footage" - An Attempt to Assess from a Film and Trick Technique Perspective

Manfred Jelinski, a seasoned film and video professional, provides a technical assessment of the Santilli film, which purports to show the Roswell crash aftermath and an alien autopsy. Jelinski approaches the analysis with the assumption that the film could be a forgery and meticulously examines it from a 1947 technical standpoint. He notes that the black and white film stock (Kodak Double X) is appropriate for the era and the conditions depicted. He argues that the camera work, including hand-held shots, occasional unsharpness, and imperfect framing, is consistent with the challenges faced by a cameraman operating under duress in 1947, possibly with limited equipment and under fear. Jelinski also finds the 'story' behind the film's discovery – an administrative error – to be a clever, albeit cynical, explanation. He concludes that the film is "more than first-class faked" and praises the creators for their attention to detail, including historical accuracy in equipment, materials, and even the depiction of the autopsy room and procedures. He expresses a desire to meet the creators, whom he considers highly skilled "effect specialists."

Roderich H. Boes, a former television editor and cameraman, also offers his perspective, initially congratulating DEGUFO for acquiring the film for their exhibition. He acknowledges that if the film is a forgery, it is a "milestone for ufology." Boes points out several inconsistencies suggesting a fabrication: the use of "British syntax" in the supposed cameraman's text, the implausibility of a non-commissioned officer being directly contacted by generals, and the amateurish camera work (lack of tripod, unsteady shots, overexposure). He argues that a genuine historical document would not require such 'enhancements' to prove its authenticity. He suggests the film could be a test of the credulity of UFO enthusiasts or a commercial venture to exploit archival footage.

Bob Shell, an American photo professional, provides a more definitive statement based on his analysis of the original film material. He identifies the film stock as CINE Kodak Super XX, which was discontinued in 1957. However, corner markings suggest it could be from 1927, 1947, or 1967. Since the film type wasn't produced in 1927 or 1967, 1947 becomes the most plausible date. Shell concludes that the film's quality, lack of haze, and grain suggest it was processed while relatively "fresh," likely within 3-4 years of exposure. He states he is 95% certain the film is genuine and matches the cameraman's account, pending a second chemical analysis from Kodak. He emphasizes that the film is on acetate base, not nitrate, and that 16mm film was indeed produced on nitrate bases in the 1920s, a fact he initially overlooked.

Hypothesis: The Physical Reality of UFOs

Structures within the Inner Space of Gravity

This section presents a hypothesis about the physical reality of UFOs, focusing on structures within the "inner space of gravity." It suggests that UFOs might not be conventional physical objects but rather manifestations related to gravity manipulation or phenomena within a different dimensional framework.

Dates / Events

1st Congress of DEGUFO in Sulzbach

This entry notes the upcoming 1st Congress of DEGUFO, to be held in Sulzbach.

Theme: New Consciousness

Spirit and Matter

This section explores the theme of "New Consciousness," specifically examining the relationship between spirit and matter.

Book Reviews

This issue features several book reviews:

• "UFOs - Zeugen und Zeichen" by Illobrand von Ludwiger.
• "UFOs und alte Steine - Neue Sichtungen in Eifel und Ardennen" by Willi Schillings.
• "Fremde aus dem All" by Erich von Däniken.
• "Das Geheimnis der großen Seher - Der Schlüssel zur Zukunft" by Reinhard Mussik.

Discussion: Theme Disinformation

Discussion on the article "Disinformation in P.M.?" from the previous issue

This section continues a discussion from the previous issue regarding "Disinformation in P.M.?", inviting further reader engagement on the topic.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of DEGUFORUM demonstrates a commitment to rigorous investigation and open discussion of UFO phenomena. The detailed technical analysis of the Santilli film highlights the magazine's dedication to examining evidence critically, even when it leads to conclusions of forgery. The inclusion of diverse perspectives, from film experts to researchers, underscores a balanced approach. The exploration of themes like "New Consciousness" and the review of books by prominent authors like Erich von Däniken indicate an interest in the broader philosophical and cultural implications of UFO studies. The ongoing discussion on disinformation reflects a concern with media accuracy and the challenges of discerning truth in a complex information landscape. The editorial's candid discussion of internal organizational matters and financial realities suggests a transparent and pragmatic approach to managing the publication and its activities.

This issue of Deguforum, dated September 14, 1995, focuses on the Roswell incident and broader themes of consciousness, reality, and physics. It features articles that question established narratives and propose new theoretical frameworks.

Articles

The Roswell Film and Film Material

The issue begins by addressing the controversy surrounding the film material related to the Roswell incident. The author, initially stating that Kodak never produced 16mm film on a nitrate base, revises this statement after consulting with a friend who worked at Bell & Howell and reviewing a 1973 press release. This release, along with information from 'American Cinematograph -Magazin,' confirms that 16mm material was indeed produced on a nitrate base. However, the author's personal analysis of the film's content, particularly the presence of a clock and a coiled telephone cable, suggests that a 1927 date is unlikely, leaning towards a 1947 origin. The information about the shift from acetate to triacetate film did not come from Kodak but from a private film preservation institute and other film archives. A faxed response from Bob Shell confirms that the film provided by Ray Santilli is definitively acetate-based, not nitrate, and he believes it dates from 1947.

UFO Crash in Russia (ARTE Broadcast)

Andreas Haxel summarizes an ARTE broadcast from August 29, 1995, titled 'Aliens - The Proof.' This program featured secret film material from Russia allegedly showing a UFO crash in Mittelsibirien, Krasnojarsk region, on June 5, 1947. The report details how soldiers attempted to cover up the event, with a boy witnessing them transport wreckage. A witness, Anna Gervanowa, recounts her father's story of an object from another world crashing. Professor Mirko Gervanow of the KGB investigated the remains, and the film shows the examination of alien-like tissue. The commentator suggests the Roswell incident was a US deception to keep pace with the USSR, with fabricated evidence and staged alien dummies. The film material was allegedly exchanged between the CIA and KGB for Anna Gervanowa's release from the Gulag.

Discussion on Roswell and UFO Evidence

A life discussion among scientists is presented, with most concluding that there is evidence for extraterrestrial life. The difficulty of proving reality with images is mentioned, and scientists are criticized for being hesitant to investigate due to fear of appearing irrational. The segment ends with the statement, "The truth is out there somewhere."

Black Eyes (Short Story)

This is a short story by Michael Heggenberger about a man named Frank who experiences a vivid dream involving a gray alien and a message, "We are here." He wakes up with a strange scar and a sense of unease, questioning if aliens are already among us and working with humans.

Tod und Leben (Death and Life)

A philosophical piece by H.-J. Heyer reflecting on perception, reality, and the nature of existence, questioning the distinction between dreams and reality.

The Physical Reality of UFOs: Structures in the Inner Space of Gravity

This extensive article by an unnamed author explores the nature of reality, consciousness, and matter. It posits that UFO phenomena are part of a broader spectrum of paranormal events and that understanding them can lead to answers about epistemology and the interaction between mind and matter.

• Psychoide Reality: C.G. Jung's concept of psychoide reality is presented as something created by the mind but also having physical reality. The author proposes hypotheses based on scientific findings.
• State Areas (ZB) and Inner Space of Gravity: The article introduces the concept of 'state areas' (ZB) as fundamental units that permeate space and are both mental and physical. The 'inner space of gravity' is described as the realm where these ZBs interact, forming a reality beyond simple reductionism.
• Mind-Matter Interaction: The author argues that mental events leave indelible traces in space, shaping its structure. This structure is not localized but omnipresent, akin to gravity. The interaction between mind and matter is crucial for understanding UFOs.
• Light as a Metaphor: The emission and absorption of photons are used as a metaphor for the interaction between ZBs, illustrating the concept of congruence and the creation of new events.
• Quarks and Paradoxical Reality: The concept of quarks is introduced as a paradoxical reality within hadrons, embodying gravity. The author links this to the idea that the inner space of hadrons mirrors the outer space.
• Flowing Time: The article explains that the confluence of ZBs creates a flowing time for the observer, where events are perceived sequentially.
• Physical Reality as Particle and Wave: The existence of particles is explained as a moment of congruence within the inner space of gravity, with waves of ZBs carrying particles into physical space.
• The Proton as an Open Window: Protons are described as gateways through which light (representing mental events) enters the inner space of gravity, leading to experiences of consciousness.
• Reincarnation and Random Congruence: The article suggests that reincarnation is a rare but possible event resulting from the confluence of ZBs, where aspects of a past self are experienced. It emphasizes that this is not a physical but a mental event.
• The World Formula: The article touches upon the scientific quest for a unifying 'world formula' that can explain all phenomena, referencing physicists like John A. Wheeler and Stephen Hawking.

1. DEGUFO Congress

A report on the 1st DEGUFO Congress held in Sulzbach on September 23-24, 1995, detailing the event's organization, participants, and presentations, including a controversial lecture by Michael Hesemann.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores the intersection of the unexplained (UFOs, paranormal phenomena) with scientific and philosophical inquiry. There's a strong emphasis on challenging conventional materialistic views and proposing alternative models of reality that incorporate consciousness and mental events. The editorial stance appears to be open to unconventional theories, encouraging readers to question established paradigms and consider the possibility of phenomena beyond current scientific understanding. The articles often delve into complex theoretical frameworks, attempting to bridge the gap between subjective experience and objective reality.

This issue of Deguforum, titled "Neues Bewußtsein" (New Consciousness), delves into complex philosophical and scientific topics, with a particular focus on information theory, the nature of reality, and the challenges of understanding phenomena like UFOs. The magazine features a blend of theoretical articles, book reviews, and reader correspondence, reflecting a critical approach to established scientific paradigms.

Theoretical Articles

The lead article, "Neues Bewußtsein," by Andreas Haxel, explores the concept of information and its role in defining reality. It posits that a sequence is considered unpredictable as long as no formula can describe it, and that the complexity of a sequence can be reduced to a formula. However, it highlights the paradox that a formula itself can be described by another formula, leading to an infinite regress and making it impossible to definitively identify the shortest possible description of a sequence. This leads to the conclusion that it's impossible to prove a formula's ultimate justification from within itself, as it might always be derivable from a deeper, yet undiscovered, principle. The article touches upon information theory's intersection with physics and the scientific dogma of favoring the simplest explanation. It suggests that a true "world formula" must not only describe the universe but also be irreducible, meaning it must be identical to the universe itself.

Hans J. Heyer contributes a significant piece discussing the debate between materialism and idealism. He argues that the spiritualist perspective, where mind is primary, offers a more viable model than materialism. Heyer posits that if matter is primary, then natural laws are properties of matter, requiring an exchange of matter/energy for phenomena like gravity. He suggests that space and time are generated by matter itself. Conversely, if mind is primary, then all processes, including thought and dreams, are fundamentally energetic or material. Heyer concludes that the distinction between materialism and idealism lies in their framework: materialism considers everything within space and time, while idealism incorporates these frameworks as part of a larger system of sensory data. He cites philosopher Peter Sloterdijk, comparing thought to a violin's tone, where the mind acts as an instrument for concepts that define the world.

Another article by Heyer addresses the limitations of scientific inquiry, particularly concerning UFO phenomena. He criticizes the scientific method for its tendency to exclude anomalies rather than explain them, arguing that scientific laws derived from such methods are inherently incapable of accounting for the unexplained. Heyer also critiques the notion of a blind evolution, suggesting that a higher consciousness or hierarchy might be guiding events, a concept he believes is obscured by the idea of "conspiracies."

Book Reviews

The issue features several book reviews, offering critical assessments of works related to UFOs, ancient history, and prophecy.

• "UFOs - Zeugen und Zeichen" by Illobrand von Ludwiger: This review by Hans J. Heyer examines a collection of scientific essays on UFOs. Heyer praises the book's comprehensive approach, covering various disciplines and methodologies. However, he critiques its temporal scope, arguing that it overlooks earlier theories on ancient astronauts (Sitchin, Däniken) and fails to address potential Nazi UFO connections. Heyer also questions the assertion that governments do not engage in cover-ups, citing evidence of secrecy and the suppression of information. He suggests that the book's authors may be influenced by a belief in blind evolution, leading them to attribute secrecy to psychological factors rather than deliberate manipulation.
• "UFOs und alte Steine - Neue Sichtungen in Eifel und Ardennen" by Willi Schillings: Heyer reviews this book, which explores the connection between ancient megaliths, UFO sightings, and paranormal phenomena. He notes that Schillings' work supports Jacques Vallee's theories and highlights the continuity of UFO-related narratives across history. Heyer also points out Schillings' frustration with the lack of openness from Belgian authorities regarding UFO reports, suggesting a deliberate suppression of information.
• "Fremde aus dem All" (edited by Erich von Däniken): Heyer finds this collection of essays by members and friends of the Ancient Astronaut Society surprisingly insightful, despite his initial reservations about repetitive themes. He commends the focused nature of the individual contributions, which cover diverse topics like the Palenque sarcophagus lid, ancient temples, and historical crop circles. He notes that the book addresses scientific hygiene and Paleo-SETI, and includes discussions on the nature of reality and information.
• "Das Geheimnis der großen Seher - Der Schlüssel zur Zukunft" by Reinhard Mussik: Heyer reviews this book on prophecy, highlighting its exploration of cyclical time and the methods used by ancient seers. He finds the concept of a 362-year cycle fascinating but questions its universality and the author's focus on historical dynasties. Heyer suggests that while Mussik seeks cyclical patterns in external events, his own research aims to make linear time cyclical through understanding, thereby generating consciousness.

Reader Correspondence and Debates

The issue includes a lively debate on "Desinformation," primarily between Hans J. Heyer and Gerald Mosbleck, with a response from Peter Ripota.

• Mosbleck's critique of Heyer: Mosbleck criticizes Heyer's article on "Desinformation in P.M.?" He accuses Heyer of labeling groups like GEP and GWUP as "skeptic organizations" without understanding their critical role. Mosbleck also questions Heyer's dismissal of MUFON-CES and suggests that Heyer himself is not a credible source, pointing to his admission of seeing religion and myth as realities.
• Heyer's response to Mosbleck: Heyer defends his arguments, accusing Mosbleck of using disinformation tactics similar to those he criticized in Ripota's article. Heyer clarifies his use of "realities" in relation to religion and myth, explaining it as a structural basis for consciousness. He argues that Mosbleck's critique is superficial and avoids engaging with the substance of his arguments.
• Ripota's response to Heyer: Ripota thanks Heyer for his critique but defends his article, stating that the logic of intelligence agencies cannot be blamed on him. He explains that MUFON-CES was not mentioned due to their lack of cooperation and threats, making collaboration impossible. Ripota agrees with Heyer's assessment of media information policies, suggesting that media outlets are not primarily for disseminating correct information but rather for shaping perceptions.

Other Content

The issue also includes a section on "Termine / Veranstaltungen" (Dates / Events), announcing an international congress on "Karma and Reincarnation '96." There is also a reader letter from H.-J. Heyer to Peter Ripota of P.M. magazine, expressing his long-standing interest in P.M. but questioning its potential for manipulation and the influence of money on scientific reporting. He also touches upon the decline of the German language and the societal impact of technological advancement.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

A recurring theme throughout the issue is the critique of mainstream science and media, which are often portrayed as being influenced by financial interests, political agendas, or a limited worldview. The magazine champions alternative research and critical thinking, particularly in the fields of UFOlogy, consciousness studies, and ancient mysteries. There is a strong emphasis on the idea that reality is more complex than conventional scientific models allow, and that phenomena often dismissed by mainstream science warrant serious investigation. The editorial stance appears to favor a more holistic and integrated understanding of reality, where subjective experience and consciousness play a crucial role alongside empirical data. The debate on disinformation highlights a concern about the manipulation of information and a call for greater transparency and intellectual honesty in reporting.

This issue of 'Leserbriefe' (Letters to the Editor) from DEGUFORUM, volume 6, dated August 2, 1995, focuses on a discussion titled 'Diskussion Thema "Desinformation"' (Discussion Topic "Disinformation"). The content primarily consists of a debate between two letter writers, Hansjürgen Köhler and H.-J. Heyer, regarding conspiracy theories, UFOs, and the nature of truth and evidence in reporting.

Hansjürgen Köhler's Perspective

Köhler begins by addressing Heyer, who he implies is a 'Volksverdummer' (deceiver of the people) for working with conspiracy theories. Köhler argues that such theories, which posit that powerful organizations conspire against citizens by suppressing information, are dangerous. He believes they can lead to widespread paranoia and distrust in institutions, and that dictators often favor such theories. He cites the historical example of anti-Semitic 'Zionist world conspiracy' theories that led to immense suffering. Köhler questions whether those who promote such theories are themselves the deceivers.

He recounts showing Heyer's letter to an acquaintance who dismissed Heyer's 'conspiracy theories' as 'nonsense.' Köhler uses this to illustrate how a reader can be misled into thinking something is false, even if the reporting itself isn't a lie. He suggests that writers should consider the potential for readers' naivety and the thoughts their writings might provoke. Köhler acknowledges that some theories are dangerous because they are too close to the truth, which can be psychologically difficult for many, leading to paranoia. However, he states he is not afraid due to his worldview.

Köhler also references Machiavelli's 'The Prince' and Le Bon's 'Psychology of the Masses' as examples of how masses are manipulated, which he equates to conspiracy. He points to the official confirmation and investigation of UFOs in Belgium by the military, contrasting it with their absence in Germany, as an example of potential conspiracy. He suggests that curriculum development for universities and schools by ministries, which involves omitting certain information, is also a form of conspiracy.

Köhler interprets the media industry's approach to information, similar to selling vacuum cleaners where truth is not a criterion, as a 'Sachzwang' (objective constraint) within a democratic, competitive, capitalist system. However, he believes that people deliberately create systems and structures that prevent truth from emerging, which he calls conspiracy. He suggests these structures might be unintentionally created, or intentionally so.

He concludes by stating that individual consciousness is influenced by the collective unconscious, and that individuals can influence this unconscious, which he also labels as conspiracy. He identifies two opposing forces acting on the collective unconscious: one differentiating, the other integrating. To reach truth, one must learn to use both, and the question then becomes whether they are used for enslavement or liberation.

H.-J. Heyer's Response

Heyer responds to Köhler's points, beginning with an acknowledgment of Köhler's critique of DEGUFORUM and the 'idol defense' or 'loss of reality sense' in the context of the 'P.M.' article. Heyer clarifies that his UFO article was not influenced by anyone and reflects his own opinion.

Regarding the 'deception of the people' accusation, Heyer turns it back, suggesting that Köhler's own approach might be the source of deception. He questions the validity of MUFON-CES's 'computer games' and 'UFO myths' as evidence for 'actually existing UFOs.' He asks who is truly misleading readers.

Heyer defends his stance on conspiracy theories, stating that a theory can be correct even if considered dangerous. He reiterates his belief that Köhler's critique stems from a lack of understanding of how to approach the UFO phenomenon, finding Köhler's methods too limited. He dismisses the idea that he is 'licking his wounds' after the 'P.M.' article, instead stating that the article provided a fantastic opportunity to discuss disinformation.

On the matter of UFO evidence, Heyer explains that UFOs are defined as 'unknown' or 'unidentified' flying objects. He argues that he doesn't need to prove they are extraterrestrial spacecraft, but rather that they are flying objects that cannot be identified due to lack of information. He challenges Köhler to explain away the thousands of witnesses (including himself) who have reported unexplained aerial phenomena, referencing his own experiences detailed in DEGUFORUM Nr. 5. He specifically mentions a cigar-shaped UFO that later dissolved into clouds, which he presented as evidence that the object was real and not merely a figment of imagination.

Heyer explains that he included a parenthetical remark about DEGUFO and MUFON-CES not being mentioned in Ripota's article to provoke letters, aiming to demonstrate that people focus on trivialities rather than the important content of his work. He expresses frustration that physicists have not engaged with his 'revolutionary physical theories' that he claims have 'turned physics upside down.'

He criticizes Köhler for focusing on personalities (like Hesemann) rather than the substance of the arguments, particularly regarding the claim that Ripota's article was manipulative. Heyer points out that neither Köhler nor Ripota's colleague from GEP have addressed this claim. He clarifies that he is a member of DEGUFO, not MUFON-CES.

To provide the 'well-documented, genuine case' requested by Köhler, Heyer refers to the sighting from July 25, 1993, documented in DEGUFORUM Nr. 5. He states that neither he nor his friend know what they saw in the sky, and that similar observations are mentioned in Ludwiger's book 'Zeugen und Zeichen' (Witnesses and Signs).

Advertisement for CHALLENGE Magazine

The issue also includes an advertisement for 'CHALLENGE,' a new magazine covering Ufology, Egyptology, pseudo-astronautics, popular science, and fringe sciences. A sample issue can be obtained for DM 5.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are disinformation, the nature of evidence in UFO research, the role of media in shaping public perception, and the psychological impact of conspiracy theories. The editorial stance, as reflected in the letters, appears to be one of open debate, with DEGUFORUM serving as a platform for these discussions, even if it involves controversial topics and differing viewpoints on what constitutes valid evidence and truth. The publication seems to encourage critical thinking and engagement with fringe subjects, while also acknowledging the potential for manipulation and deception.