CUFORG - Vol 2 No 47 - 1994 03

Magazine Overview

This document is the March 1994 issue (No. 47) of the Cambridge UFO Research Group Newsletter. It is published by the Cambridge UFO Research Group in Cambridge, Ontario, Canada. The newsletter covers a range of topics related to UFO research, including personal accounts, guest speaker summaries, conference reports, and discussions on ancient myths and potential extraterrestrial life.

Content Summary

Editorial Activities and Meetings

The newsletter begins with an account of public speaking engagements by the editor, Bonnie Wheeler. On December 8th, she spoke to members of The Cambridge Family Resource Centre, and on December 14th, she addressed grades 7 and 8 at Stewart Ave. Public School.

A phone call was received from Roy Lake in Notts, England, who offered to exchange a UFO video. He sent a video of Dr. John E. Mack, an abduction researcher, which was taped at the Fifth Annual Ozark UFOCConference.

The February meeting featured Shirley Arbuthnot as the guest speaker. Her topic was 'anthropology, myths and legends.' The minutes for this meeting were taken by Stefan Szpular, who also later presented on topics such as carbon dating, Egyptian and Hebrew chronology, presenting data from extensive research.

UFO Congress in Las Vegas

Tom Theofanous was the second guest speaker, discussing his attendance at the UFO Congress in Las Vegas, Nevada, from November 28 to December 5. He mentioned that the group decided to drive to Area 51. The convention was smaller than expected, with 200 attendees instead of 700. Researchers like Charles Hickson and Steven Greer were present. Greer is reportedly working with Ed Ames, who heads an organization that offers remote viewing services for a high price and has commercial contracts. Bill Hamilton also spoke about Lazer and Area 51. Tom Theofanous also shared details about two cases where individuals had a strange substance on their body, which could be an artifact from a UFO abduction, and he is preparing a paper on this.

Meeting Schedule Adjustments

The newsletter notes that two February meetings were held due to bad weather forcing the cancellation of the January meeting, which was postponed to the first week of February.

Shirley's Presentation Notes

Detailed notes from Shirley's presentation are included, covering 'Preliminaries,' 'New People,' 'Background Anthropology, Myths and Legends,' and 'Quantum Physics.' Under 'New People,' several individuals are listed, including Dennis Reilly, Todd, John Powdell, Jackie, Janette, Gwen (from Toronto, interested in metaphysical for 20 years), and Mike.

The 'Background' section touches upon 'Journey To The Stars,' ancient perceptions of the universe, the heliocentric concept adopted by Greeks, and early Christian views. It also discusses the Law of Conservation of Energy, noting that nothing can exceed the speed of light (186,000 miles per second), and the equation E=MC2.

Space and Extraterrestrial Life

Further notes from Shirley's presentation explore concepts like stars within light years of Earth, calculations of seconds in a year, and the number of stars and possibilities in our galaxy. It questions the spending of money on SETI.

Requirements for Space Travel/Contact

Requirements for potential space endeavors are listed, including 10 years of study, biology/chemistry of space, astronomy, physics, dealing with weightlessness, surgery difficulties, cosmic radiation, collision with space junk, and the launch of Sputnik and the moon landing.

Theories on Moon and Mars

Geologists believe the Earth and Moon formed about 4.5 billion years ago. There's a discussion about the moon's original composition and a comparison of moon rocks to Earth's rocks. The possibility of Mars being inhabited or visited is explored, with questions about whether Martians are transmitting signals and if Earth has been transmitting signals for decades. It discusses the concept of a 'peaceful civilization' versus an 'aggressive, tartaric' one and the planet being in constant conflict.

Potential Contact Scenarios

Notes suggest that advanced civilizations might not want to contact us due to our current 'barbarity.' The idea of a 'microwave fence' around countries is mentioned, which anyone with a radio telescope could pick up.

Conclusion and Thoughts

The conclusion emphasizes the power of the mind, citing E. G. Walter's research at a scientific convention in Prague, Czechoslovakia in 1969. It encourages doing good deeds, offering compliments, and changing negative thoughts to positive ones.

Questions and Answers

A section of 'Questions' includes inquiries about whether our planet is currently being visited (answered with 'Yes'), what caused the Big Bang (referencing an Indian myth about Brahma breathing in and out), and the significance of phenomena in ancient myths and legends. Examples of ages like Golden Age, Tin Age, Bronze Age, and Iron Age are mentioned, sourced from the Middle East.

Another section discusses common myths and legends worldwide, such as Flood Myths, Creation Myths, Paradise Myths, Messiah myths, Virgin Myth, Return myths, and Golden Age myths. It also touches upon the work of a gifted psychic, Ing. Twigg, who tried to establish life after death with priests and bishops. Her work involved finding lost people and was related to the 'finding of the war.'

Sitech and Parapsychology

Questions are posed to Shirley about 'Sitech,' its connection to remote viewing, and its organization. It's mentioned that Sitech has military individuals and has gone from 2 people to 900 in 9 months. Shirley's own work in parapsychology is also mentioned, with her having gotten into the parapsychological field in Nevada with notable figures, similar to the Sitech situation. The notes also reference Immanuel Velikovsky and the 'dust found on the moon in 1969,' suggesting weightlessness would not allow for this.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include UFO sightings and research, the possibility of extraterrestrial contact, the study of ancient myths and their connection to modern phenomena, and the exploration of parapsychology and remote viewing. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into these subjects, presenting information from various speakers and researchers, while also encouraging personal growth and positive thinking.

This issue of STRANGE Magazine, dated December 3, 1993, with volume 7 and issue 123, focuses on UFOs and related phenomena. The cover features a Calvin and Hobbes comic strip with dialogue about originality and irony, and a headline that reads "Aliens, Venus And It's Sunday So It Must Be Belgium!". The magazine is published by STRANGE MAGAZINE in the USA and is in English.

Articles and Features

Calvin and Hobbes Comic Strip

The issue opens with a Calvin and Hobbes comic strip where Calvin is building a snowman. Hobbes comments on Calvin's lack of originality and suggests he should keep quiet if he has nothing significant to say. Calvin responds by stating that expressing ideas is pointless if they cannot be understood. Hobbes then remarks on the burden of talent and responsibility, while Calvin laments being the sole guardian of high culture.

The 'Biomorph' Phenomenon

An article details the investigation of Robert Plant by Clive Potter, a BUFORA council member. Plant has allegedly undergone facial transformations, assuming an alien-like appearance, which Potter terms a 'BIOMORPH'. These transformations reportedly involved silvery, glowing tadpole-like forms obscuring his face and changing his features. In one incident, Plant's appearance briefly became reptilian. The article also touches upon the growing trend of interest in North American Indian shamanism. The author expresses concern about investigators becoming too closely involved, potentially compromising objectivity, and suggests that both the investigator and the subject might be feeding off each other. The article also mentions the involvement of the Scottish UFO band, CEIV, and a strange event where one member transformed into an alien creature in front of other band members, with Clive Potter present but not witnessing it directly.

UFOs are Scientist's Passion: Stanton Friedman

This section features an article by Jeff Hurst about Stanton T. Friedman, a nuclear physicist who is a passionate ufologist. Friedman believes the government has maintained a 46-year conspiracy to conceal the truth about the Roswell incident of July 8, 1947, where a 'flying disc' was allegedly recovered. He has written a book, "Crash At Corona," and has lectured extensively on the topic. Friedman argues that even if the military had discovered UFO technology, they could not replicate it, comparing it to giving Christopher Columbus a nuclear submarine. He highlights the difficulty in obtaining government documents, often blacked out due to 'national security,' and refers to the cover-up as a "cosmic Watergate."

The Far Side Cartoons

Two "The Far Side" cartoons by Gary Larson are included. The first depicts a man in a hat looking at a UFO with a thought bubble asking "What the hey is this?". The second cartoon shows figures in mummy-like costumes, with one saying "OK, let's see ... That's a curse on you, a curse on you, and a curse on you."

Letter to the Editor

A handwritten letter from Charles J. Muchurch of Huyton, Georgia, to "Bonnie" requests that a sketch be placed in her newsletter or bulletin. The sketch is described as humorous, and the name "Tapley" is mentioned as a mother's maiden name. The sender asks for the sketch to be copied using blue or grape purple ink to make it "more positive artistic."

Artwork

A drawing is included, described as "Just a rough Idea, Asfar as what I can Eye BALL down be Low With Work HE Could BE AS, GRAPE as ME". It features a stylized figure and the words "Wospley Ever After."

Real Life Adventures

A short piece titled "Real Life Adventures" presents two scenarios related to UFO landing sites. One cartoon shows a person standing in a crop circle, with the caption "Either (a) you have yet to develop a really good touch with the fertilizer spreader, or (b) your yard is a UFO landing site." Another cartoon depicts an alien-like creature in space asking "WHAT THE HECK IS THIS?" and a second panel with a space station and shuttle, where an astronaut says "HELLO, HOUSTON? WE LOST CONTACT LENS!"

A Critique of Budd Hopkins' Case of the UFO Abduction of Linda Napolitano

This is a significant portion of the magazine, presenting a critical report by Joseph J. Stefula, Richard D. Butler, and George P. Hansen. The report focuses on the purported UFO abduction case of Linda Napolitano, who claims to have been abducted in November 1989 from her Manhattan apartment. The case involves multiple witnesses, including an alleged sighting by Javier Perez de Cuellar and a woman on the Brooklyn Bridge. The report notes Napolitano's claims of nose bleeds and an X-ray showing an implant. The authors express skepticism, pointing out the lack of a detailed written report from Budd Hopkins, who is instrumental in promoting the case. They suggest that a science fiction novel may have influenced elements of the story. The report also criticizes the behavior of prominent ufologists and organizations like MUFON and CUFOS, accusing them of aggressively attempting to suppress evidence and questioning their scientific and journalistic integrity. Budd Hopkins is identified as a key figure in drawing attention to extraterrestrial abduction experiences, having written books and established the Intruders Foundation.

The report highlights that Hopkins, while not a trained therapist or scientist, has involved notable figures like Dr. John E. Mack. It notes that Hopkins has made numerous public presentations and that the case has generated international interest, being covered by major media outlets. Hopkins himself has described the case as "the most important case" for establishing the objective reality of UFO abductions.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of STRANGE Magazine exhibits a strong interest in UFO phenomena, alien encounters, and unexplained mysteries. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical investigation, as evidenced by the detailed critique of the Linda Napolitano abduction case and the questioning of established figures and organizations within ufology. The inclusion of both serious investigative articles and lighthearted comic strips suggests an aim to engage a broad audience interested in the anomalous.

This document, titled "The Authors' Involvement," details an investigation into a complex UFO abduction case involving Linda Napolitano. The authors, who are researchers themselves, describe their process of monitoring and investigating the case, which began with monitoring Hopkins' progress and briefing a third author. They highlight concerns about the long-term effects of the case on abduction research.

The Authors' Involvement The narrative begins with the authors learning of the case before Hopkins publicized it. Richard Butler, a researcher, was familiar with Hopkins' informal meetings for abductees and researchers. In October 1991, Butler invited Stefula to a gathering where Hopkins presented the case. Stefula had a chance to speak with Linda about her experiences and was given her contact information, along with assurances of contacts in federal and state law enforcement agencies. Hopkins also received this information.

On January 28, 1992, Linda requested a meeting with Richard Butler. A meeting occurred on February 1, 1992, in New York City, where Linda provided more details. She asked Butler and Stefula not to inform Hopkins of their discussions. At the 1992 MUFON convention in Albuquerque, New Mexico, both Hopkins and Linda presented the case. Stefula attended and noted contradictions in statements. The authors attempted to contact Hopkins to resolve these matters, but he declined until his manuscript was submitted. A meeting was eventually arranged at Hopkins' home on October 3, 1992.

Summary of Case This section outlines the alleged events, drawing from Hopkins' and Linda's presentations, interviews with Linda, and Hopkins' articles. The case began in April 1989 with a letter from Linda Napolitano to Hopkins. She recalled detecting a bump on her nose 13 years prior, which a physician insisted was from nasal surgery, though Linda claimed no such surgery had occurred.

Hopkins became interested due to potential medical evidence and Linda's proximity. Linda visited Hopkins, discussed past experiences, and began attending his support group. On November 30, 1989, Linda reported an abduction, detailing floating out of her apartment window and ascending into a craft via a bluish-white beam of light.

Richard and Dan In February 1991, Hopkins received a letter signed by "Richard and Dan," who claimed to be undercover police officers observing a large, reddish-orange object with green lights above an apartment building on November 30, 1989. They reported seeing a woman and figures float into the object. They expressed concern for the woman's well-being and wanted to contact her. Linda later confirmed being visited by two men identifying themselves as police officers, named Richard and Dan. They expressed relief that she was alive but were reluctant to meet with Hopkins. They agreed to record their account, which Hopkins later received.

Later, Dan sent another letter. Richard had taken a leave of absence due to emotional trauma, and Richard was reportedly secretly watching Linda. It was later revealed that Richard and Dan were not police officers but security officers for a VIP. Their car stalled near the FDR Drive, and the VIP also witnessed the event.

The Kidnappings Linda claimed to have been kidnapped twice. In April 1991, Richard forced her into a car driven by Dan. She was interrogated about aliens and government work. They examined her feet for ET characteristics. She recalled another car involved and provided license plate numbers traced to "agencies." Linda stated the kidnapping was legal due to national security. In February 1992, she met with Stefula and Butler, detailing further aspects of the kidnappings.

On October 15, 1991, Dan accosted her and pulled her into a sports car. Linda recorded part of Dan's questioning. Dan drove her to a beach house on Long Island, demanding she remove her clothes and put on a nightgown. He spoke incoherently about her being the "Lady of the Sands." She fled but was caught, forced into the water, and held underwater. An external "force" intervened, knocking Dan back. Linda escaped, but Richard appeared and convinced her to return. She recovered a cassette tape and stationery bearing a Central Intelligence Agency letterhead.

In a conversation on October 3, 1992, Hopkins mentioned Linda was disheveled and traumatized upon returning from the kidnapping.

Further Contacts with Richard and Dan In February 1992, Linda met Richard outside a Manhattan bank. He spoke of Dan's deteriorating mental condition. Linda received a card and letter from Dan, who claimed to be in a mental institution and expressed a desire to kidnap her, take her out of the country, and marry her. Linda was alarmed and gave a copy to Stefula and Butler. Linda also reported attempts by one of the men to contact her near South Street Seaport in December 1991, driving a black sedan with Saudi Arabian UN license plates.

The Third Man Linda mentioned that Hopkins received a letter from "the third man" (the VIP), discussing ecological danger and alien involvement in ending the Cold War. The letter warned Hopkins to stop searching for him. Linda recalled being on a beach with Dan, Richard, and the third man, feeling used by aliens to control them. She suggested she had known Richard previously. The third man was identified as Javier Perez de Cuellar, then UN Secretary General. Vehicles used in her kidnappings were traced to UN missions.

Witness on the Brooklyn Bridge In the summer of 1991, a woman named Janet Kimble wrote to Hopkins about an event on November 30, 1989, on the Brooklyn Bridge. Her car stopped, lights went out, and she saw a bright object and four figures emerge from a window and move into the craft. She was frightened, and other drivers reacted similarly.

Initial Problems with the Case This section critically examines the credibility of the case. The authors point out that the three principal witnesses (Richard, Dan, and Perez de Cuellar) were never interviewed face-to-face by Hopkins, despite the time elapsed since the abduction. Richard and Dan refused to speak directly with Hopkins, and their existence is not confirmed by hard evidence. Their delay in contacting Hopkins and Linda is questioned. The background and verification of Janet Kimble's testimony are also questioned, as she only spoke to family and friends and did not contact other UFO investigators.

The mental state of Dan and Richard is noted, with Dan having been in a mental institution and Richard suffering extreme emotional distress. The authors question how they could be allowed to drive a car with UN license plates if they had such issues. The identity of the doctor who took Linda's X-rays is unknown, and no formal report is available. The authors suggest the possibility of Linda fabricating the implant with a technician.

Linda's refusal to contact the police, even after urging, is highlighted as a major credibility issue, suggesting she might fear criminal charges if her story was proven false.

Our Investigation Despite the problems, the authors conducted their own investigation. In September 1992, Stefula, Butler, and Hansen visited Linda's apartment complex and the site under the FDR Drive. The security guard and supervisor at the complex reported no knowledge of a UFO encounter. The apartment manager also had no information. An employee at the New York Post stated the loading dock was in use until 5:00 a.m., with frequent truck activity, and the manager knew nothing of a UFO sighting nearby. A colleague checked the Downtown Heliport and found no unusual activity on the night of the alleged abduction.

The Meeting of October 3 The authors met with Hopkins and his colleagues, including David Jacobs, Walter H. Andrus, and Jerome Clark. They inquired if Hopkins had asked the apartment complex guards about the UFO, which he had not. They also noted Hopkins did not feel it necessary to verify Linda's claim of police canvassing. Hopkins' lack of knowledge about the weather conditions on the night of the abduction was considered a significant failure in his investigative capabilities.

During the meeting, Hopkins' supporters alluded to other world figures involved, and an expert consultant on dignitary protective services presented information on preplanning and coordination for moving officials, suggesting a test of Richard and Dan's knowledge.

Linda's husband attended part of the meeting, appearing to have difficulty answering questions, and Linda corrected his memory. He left early, raising questions. Linda admitted to previously misleading Hansen about her husband's birthplace. A financial agreement between Linda and Hopkins to split book profits was discussed, with Hopkins denying it and Linda claiming she planted disinformation.

Reports from two psychologists indicated Linda's intelligence was in the "average" range, and she was not capable of orchestrating a hoax. Ms. Penelope Franklin, an editor and colleague of Hopkins, asserted that Linda was justified in lying about the case.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance The recurring themes in this document are the investigation of a purported UFO abduction, the credibility of witness testimony, and the methodologies and potential biases of UFO researchers. The authors adopt a critical and skeptical stance, meticulously detailing inconsistencies, lack of verification, and questionable practices by both the alleged abductee and the primary researcher, Budd Hopkins. They emphasize the importance of rigorous investigation and evidence-based conclusions, repeatedly questioning the reliability of the presented information and the depth of the investigation conducted by Hopkins.

This document, likely an issue of a UFO-focused magazine, presents a critical analysis of the Linda Napolitano UFO abduction case. It questions the scientific integrity of prominent figures in ufology and explores potential explanations for the case's unusual elements, including a possible literary basis and psycho-social dynamics within the field.

Investigation and Criticism of UFO Leaders

The article begins by highlighting concerns raised by Linda Napolitano's statement, particularly regarding her association with UFO investigator Budd Hopkins. The authors question the scientific integrity of Hopkins' circle and wonder if abductees are being advised to lie. They specifically call out Hopkins' reaction to their investigation, noting his suspicion of government agents within UFO networks and his warning to others to cease their investigation of the Napolitano case. Hopkins is described as having warned Butler that he suspected Butler and Stefula of being government agents and later suspected Hansen of being a CIA agent. This behavior is characterized as reflecting the mindset of a cult leader rather than a truth-seeker.

The investigation also details the reactions of other prominent ufology leaders, including Walter Andrus, International Director of MUFON, and Jerome Clark. Andrus reportedly told Stefula that MUFON had no interest in publishing material critical of the case, despite having previously described it as 'The Abduction Case of the Century.' Clark, a columnist and editor, is noted for urging outsiders to cease investigations and for writing that the case might involve a 'political figure of international stature.' The authors express surprise at the 'belligerently antiscientific attitudes' displayed by these leaders, especially when they allegedly attempted to suppress evidence of an attempted murder and vigorously argued against requesting a federal investigation.

Possible Literary Basis for the Story

A significant portion of the document is dedicated to exploring a potential literary origin for the Napolitano case. The authors draw attention to the science fiction novel 'Nighteyes' by Garfield Reeves-Stevens, published in April 1989, a few months before Linda claimed to have been abducted. They present a detailed comparison, in Table 1, of similarities between Linda's reported experiences and the characters Sarah and Wendy in 'Nighteyes.' These parallels include abduction scenarios involving UFOs hovering over high-rise buildings, government agents involved in stakeouts and abductions, kidnapping into vehicles, surveillance by vans, hospitalization for emotional trauma, and the use of safe houses, some located on the beach. The authors suggest that the novel may have served as the basis for Linda's story, emphasizing that the parallels are with discrete elements rather than the overall storyline.

Psycho-Social Perspective on Ufology

The article proposes a 'psycho-social perspective' to understand the motivations and behaviors of ufology leaders. It suggests that these individuals may not fully engage with the 'real world' in their investigations, and their actions are more consistent with 'fantasy role playing,' akin to the game Dungeons and Dragons (D & D). This perspective posits that ufology, like D & D, allows for direct involvement with powerful 'other-world' beings and mythological motifs. The authors argue that the unstructured nature of ufology makes it potentially more 'dangerous' than D & D, leading some to 'concretize' beings as ET humanoids. They note that in this 'game,' the rules are not questioned, and the basic evidence is accepted without scrutiny. The article encourages researchers to become more familiar with psycho-social theories, citing works like 'Angels and Aliens' by Keith Thompson and the magazine 'Magonia.'

Discussion and Conclusion

The authors acknowledge that the Napolitano case is beset by problems and that they embarked on the investigation with misgivings, fearing it could discredit UFO abduction research. They note that one of them, Butler, has had personal abduction experiences. They argue that not raising these issues for public discussion would have posed a greater risk to the field, especially as the case was gaining significant attention.

They express disappointment with the reaction from UFO leaders, finding their attitudes 'belligerently antiscientific' and incompatible with 'real world' events. While not labeling them 'deluded,' they point out that these individuals are supported by figures like Harvard psychiatrist John Mack and Temple University professor David Jacobs.

The authors strongly support scientific research into abduction phenomena and commend high-quality studies, while also believing that the core abduction experience remains unexplained by normal scientific frameworks. They critique David Jacobs' work, noting his criticism of other researchers and his lavish praise for Hopkins, suggesting Jacobs may have had the Napolitano case in mind. The authors conclude that the argument for the 'objective reality of UFO abductions' relies heavily on Hopkins' work, and their findings call this theoretical perspective into question.

Regarding motives, the authors state that while conscious hoaxes are rare, the majority of claimants have had intense personal experiences. However, they acknowledge that fraud and hoaxing have been problems in ufology, especially for high-visibility cases. They advise researchers to be more open-minded to the potential for hoaxing without being blinded to genuine phenomena. They also discuss the difficulty of serving as both a therapist and a scientist, noting that those trying to help abductees emotionally may be vulnerable to deception.

An appendix addresses communications between Hansen and Clark, noting Clark's shifting stance on accepting Linda's claims. Initially, Clark reportedly believed Linda was sincere, but later stated he no longer accepted her claims about government agents. The authors express satisfaction that Clark has seemingly made a 'cathartic conversion' towards a more 'real-world' consideration of the issues.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this document are the critical examination of UFO investigation methods, the integrity of prominent ufologists, the potential for hoaxes and literary influences in abduction cases, and the application of psycho-social theories to understand the dynamics within the UFO community. The editorial stance is one of critical inquiry, emphasizing scientific rigor, a willingness to question established narratives, and a concern for the credibility of UFO research as a whole. The authors advocate for a balanced approach that acknowledges the possibility of genuine phenomena while remaining vigilant against fraud and unsubstantiated claims.

Title: ENIGMAS
Subtitle: THE JOURNAL OF STRANGE PHENOMENA INVESTIGATIONS
Publisher: Strange Phenomena Investigations
Country of Publication: Scotland
Price: £10.00 FOR 5 ISSUES OR £2.00 FOR A SINGLE ISSUE

This issue of ENIGMAS presents a comprehensive list of references and publications related to strange phenomena, UFOs, and the paranormal. The journal itself is edited by Malcolm Robinson and covers a wide array of topics.

Contents and Articles

The journal's content spans various fields, including Radionics, The Aura, UFO's, Crop Circles, Poltergeists, Pyramid Energy, Clairvoyance, Premonition, Spiritualism, Psychic Phenomena, Ghosts, and Earth Mysteries. The magazine aims to collect, research, and publish accounts related to strange phenomena, endeavoring to explain what currently eludes understanding.

Key Publications and Researchers Mentioned

The document extensively lists various publications and researchers in the field of ufology and strange phenomena. Notable authors and their works include:

• Jerome Clark: Mentioned for his papers "The Politics of Torquemada; or, Earth Calling Hansen's Planet" and "Wasting Away in Torquemadaville."
• Marie-Therese De Brosses: Cited for an article in Paris Match.
• Drano the Sewerian: Reported on a UFO abduction conference at MIT in "Third Eyes Only."
• Raymond E. Fowler: Editor of the "MUFON Field Investigator's Manual."
• George P. Hansen: Authored "Attempted Murder vs. The Politics of Ufology: A Question of Priorities in the Linda Napolitano Case" and "'Torquemada' Responds to Jerome Clark." He also conducted parapsychological research and wrote an article for the Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research.
• Scott Hatfield: Reported on an "X-Ray Said to Show Alien Implant."
• Michael deCourcy Hinds: Wrote about "Taking U.F.O.'s for Credit, and for Real" for The New York Times.
• Budd Hopkins: A prominent researcher with several key works cited, including "Missing Time: A Documented Study of UFO Abductions," "Intruders: The Incredible Visitations at Copley Hoods," "Innocent bystanders," and discussions of "A doubly witnessed abduction" and "The Linda Cortile (Napolitano) Abduction Case."
• David J. Hufford: Author of "The Terror That Comes in the Night: An Experience-Centered Study of Supernatural Assault Traditions."
• David M. Jacobs: Wrote "On Studying the Abduction Phenomenon Without Knowing What It Is."
• David J. Jefferson: Reported on a Harvard doctor offering trauma relief for UFO "abductees" in The Wall Street Journal.
• John E. Mack: Authored "Helping: Abductees" and "Other Realities: The 'Alien Abduction' Phenomenon."
• Chris McKenna: Reported on "Doc Abducted by Aliens' Ruled Fit to Work" for the New York Post.
• Garfield Reeves-Stevens: Author of "Nighteyes."
• Kenneth Ring & Christopher J. Rosing: Co-authored "The Omega Project: A Psychological Survey of Persons Reporting Abductions and Other UFO Encounters."
• Mark Rodeghier, Jeff Goodpaster, & Sandra Blatterbauer: Conducted "Psychosocial Characteristics of Abductees: Results From the CUFOS Abduction Project."
• Deborah Sontag: Wrote about "Reverence and Rigidity in the New Age."
• Dennis Stacy: Reported on "The 1992 MUFON Symposium."
• Keith Thompson: Author of "Angels and Aliens: UFOs and the Mythic Imagination."
• Linda Moulton Howe: Producer of several videos and books, including "An Alien Harvest," "Strange Harvests - 1993," "Cropcircle Communique," and "A Strange Harvest." Her work links animal mutilations and abductions to alien life forms.

Other Productions and Products

The issue also advertises other productions by Linda Moulton Howe, including two book volumes on crop circles and alien phenomena, and videos on animal mutilations and crop circles. Order forms are provided for these items, along with pricing and shipping information for domestic and international orders.

Editorial Stance and Aims

The aims of SPI, as stated, are to collect, research, and publish accounts related to strange phenomena, and to purposely endeavor to account for what at present eludes us. The journal welcomes articles, letters, and comments from prominent people in the field.

Subscription Information

Subscription details for ENIGMAS are provided, with options for single issues or a 5-issue subscription. Overseas rates are also listed, with a note that U.S. and Canadian subscriptions must be paid in dollar bills only due to bank conversion charges.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements are extended to Philip J. Klass for assistance and Vincent Creevy for providing materials. Thanks are also given to others who assisted but wished to remain anonymous.

Personnel

Key individuals involved in investigations and research are highlighted:

• Joseph Stefula: Former Special Agent for the U.S. Army Criminal Investigations Command and former MUFON State Director for New Jersey.
• Richard Butler: Former law enforcement and security police specialist for the U.S. Air Force, now a UFO investigator researching abductions and government cover-ups.
• George Hansen: Conducted parapsychological research and authored an article in the Journal of the American Society for Psychical Research.

Contact information, including addresses and phone numbers, is provided for Joseph Stefula, Richard Butler, and George Hansen.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO phenomena, alien abductions, and broader paranormal and unexplained events. The editorial stance, as implied by the journal's aims, is one of serious investigation and research into these phenomena, seeking to understand and explain them. The journal appears to be a platform for disseminating research, case studies, and commentary from various experts in the field.