CUFORG - Vol 2 No 06 - 1981 06

Magazine Overview

Title: Cambridge UFO Research Group Newsletter
Issue: Volume II, Issue No. 6
Date: June, 1981
Publisher: Cambridge UFO Research Group
Country: Canada
Language: English

Content Summary

This issue of the Cambridge UFO Research Group Newsletter, dated June 1981, covers recent activities and discussions within the group. The newsletter begins by recapping the April meeting, which focused on catching up on past events due to missed meetings. A significant topic was the attempt to obtain a UFO documentary film called "Alien Encounters," which was running in Toronto but not available in the Kitchener-Waterloo area. Stanton Friedman reportedly lent assistance in the film's production.

The group also discussed UFO conventions scheduled for June and July, with several members from Ontario attending. The involvement of David Haisell's organization, UFOCAN, was a point of discussion. Minutes from a UFOCAN meeting held at the newsletter's author's home on April 5th were read aloud. David Haisell's trip to England in May to represent Canada at the "Second London International Congress" was also mentioned.

Further discussion centered on a UFO abduction case that occurred on August 4, 1979, in the eastern part of Toronto, which had been previously covered in the March 1981 issue and was investigated by CUFORN of Toronto. Florence and Cecilia, members of the group, provided a summary of their attendance at the "ESP" Fair in Toronto held in late March.

Later in the newsletter, the group viewed a channel 13 CKCO TV presentation titled "Newscope," which featured an interview with the author and Sid on the UFO theme. Cliff video-taped this program and also an interview with John Dowdell on astrology. The May meeting was described as enjoyable, with Cliff Cunningham and associates taking the group to an observatory in Ayr that they had built. The newsletter references a previous issue (December 1980) for more details on the observatory.

There will be no further meetings until September, and the newsletter concludes with a "Happy Summer!" message from Bonnie Wheeler, President of the Cambridge UFO Research Group.

Reported Sightings and Investigations

April 2, 1981 Sighting:
Date: April 2, 1981
Time: 4:45 A.M.
Duration: 30 minutes
Location: Kitchener, Waterloo, Brantford area

The Waterloo Regional Police Detachment reported sightings of two unidentified cloud-like objects, red in color, in the eastern sky. These objects were circular and estimated to be the size of a 50-cent piece and a nickle at arm's length, at an elevation of 45°. The OPP in Brantford and Mount Forest also reported similar sightings. The sky was clear, with a temperature of 2°C. Approximately 12 officers at the Kitchener OPP headquarters viewed the objects. The objects faded from view while being discussed. An investigation involving astronomer Cliff Cunningham revealed no astronomical explanation. However, a wire service report from Washington at 6:31 A.M. stated that red, green, and bluish lights seen before dawn in the eastern U.S. came from a NASA research rocket launched at 4:48 A.M. from its Virginia station. These clouds, released from the rocket, were visible as far north as New York and as far south as Huntsville, Alabama. NASA stated the experiment studied winds and electrical fields and that the clouds were harmless. The conclusion for this sighting was "Identified."

April 8, 1981 Sighting:
Date: April 8, 1981
Time: 7:40 P.M.
Duration: 20 minutes
Location: Gordon St., Cambridge

A witness noticed an unusually bright light in the sky, resembling a figure eight. Using binoculars, the witness observed two huge separate lights, appearing as one object the size of a street lamp. One light was straight on, the other slightly to the side. The lights were extremely bright. A large plane approached and flew between the witness and the lights. The lights flickered and went out, reappearing after the plane passed. The witness viewed the lights for another 15 minutes, noting they cast a brilliant ray like a searchlight. Two other planes approached from different directions and flew between the lights and the witnesses. The lights then blinked out and remained out. The lights remained stationary throughout the sighting. The temperature was 55°F, with a clear sky. The conclusion was "Unidentified nocturnal light."

• Other Mentions:
• A UFO abduction case from August 4, 1979, in eastern Toronto, investigated by CUFORN.
• A close encounter of the first kind reported by a Cambridge woman on Pine Bush Road in November 1980, which Bonnie Wheeler believed to be a reliable account.

Profile: Bonnie Wheeler

The issue features an article from the "Cambridge Reporter - June 1/81" titled "Alien beings hold no fear for Bonnie" by Mike Dempster. It profiles Bonnie Wheeler, president of the Cambridge UFO Research Group. Wheeler expresses a fearless and curious attitude towards potential alien encounters, stating she would draw a sketch and approach an object carefully. She founded the group in 1976 and has investigated hundreds of cases, believing firmly in the existence of UFOs. Besides her UFO research, Wheeler is a purchasing agent for Polysar Limited, attends fitness classes, enjoys gardening, and is involved with the Waterloo-Wellington Society for Psychic Research. The article notes that the UFO group emerged from the latter society. Wheeler believes that movies and books have increased public awareness and belief in UFOs.

The article details Wheeler's investigative process, which includes in-depth interviews, reviewing stories multiple times, filling out reports, and checking locations. Close encounters are categorized into three types: first kind (sighting within 500 feet), second kind (leaving evidence), and third kind (sighting of a being).

New Publication Spotlight: The New National UFO Newsletter

The newsletter introduces a new publication called "The New National UFO Newsletter," put out by Director/Editor Gil Ziemba of the Carbondale UFO Study Group in Illinois. The cover of the first issue features a drawing of a cigar-shaped craft with three smaller craft, representing an alleged UFO sighting from 1965 in California. The write-up describes how jet planes appeared, and the smaller disc-shaped objects returned to the mother-ship.

"The New National UFO Newsletter" is published monthly, featuring articles on UFO Abductions, Alien Creatures, UFO Hostilities, Mysterious Disappearances, Government UFO Conspiracy, Extraterrestrial Visitation, and the Bible & UFOs. It also includes confidential UFO reports, editorials, and photographs. The publication offers free one-year subscriptions for featured articles and exchanges publications and advertisements. Subscription details are provided: $10.00 per year for 12 issues in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico, with single copies at $1.00. Foreign subscriptions are $24.00 per year, with single copies at $2.00.

Article: Frank & Earnest

This section references Wendelle Stevens' book "UFO Contact from the Pleiades" and a case involving a Swiss citizen with numerous alien contacts. Kal Korff conducted an investigation into this case, which was presented in Gil Ziemba's "The New National UFO Newsletter" (Issue No. 1 and No. 2). Permission was granted to include this article, which is a condensed version of the first chapter of Korff's book on the case. The article is accompanied by a comic strip titled "Frank & Earnest" with the caption "WELL, SO MUCH FOR THE STATUS QUO."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, investigations, and the personal experiences of UFO researchers. The Cambridge UFO Research Group, under Bonnie Wheeler's leadership, demonstrates a methodical and serious approach to investigating UFO phenomena. There is a strong belief in the reality of UFOs and a desire to uncover the truth, as evidenced by the group's activities and the introduction of a new publication dedicated to UFOs. The editorial stance is one of open-minded inquiry and a commitment to documenting and analyzing UFO-related events. The newsletter also highlights the growing public interest in UFOs, influenced by media and literature.

This document is Part 1 of a two-part article titled "THE MEIER INCIDENT - THE MOST INFAMOUS HOAX IN UFOLOGY!" written by Kal K. Korff and copyrighted in 1981. The Editor's Note states that this article is presented exclusively for The NEW National UFO NEWSLETTER and is their first award for the best featured article of the month.

Abstract

The article presents the conclusions of a nine-month, $1400.00 investigation into the controversial Eduard "Billy" Meier case, the subject of the book "UFO...Contact From The Pleiades."

Introduction

The book "UFO...Contact From The Pleiades" claims that Billy Meier, a Swiss citizen, has had over 130 alien contacts, recorded 3,000 pages of quotes, and taken thousands of clear pictures of alien craft. It also states that an investigation by Wendelle Stevens and others has shown Meier's claims to be genuine. However, the author asserts that none of these purported events can withstand scientific scrutiny.

The Claims: The Experiences

According to the book, Meier's first extraterrestrial experience was on January 28, 1975. However, articles in Argosy UFO by Wendelle Stevens suggest Meier's first sighting was on June 2, 1942, when he was five years old. Meier also claimed to have taken a ride on a pear-shaped UFO with a "very old man" in the same year.

Press releases promoting the book claimed endorsement by Jim Lorenzen of the Aerial Phenomena Research Organization. Lorenzen, however, stated this was a "partial quote, taken out of context" and that he considered Meier's photographs to be "art," not science.

Wendelle C. Stevens, a partner in Genesis III Productions, claimed Meier sought no publicity. However, Meier had informed Wilfried Walk of Mannheim, West Germany, as early as 1977, of his plans to write a book. Jim Lorenzen also stated that Stevens once described Meier as "a sort of person who gets great satisfaction out of fooling authorities."

Analysis of Meier's Photographs

The book implies that some of Meier's pictures were analyzed by computer and found authentic, suggesting De Anza Systems of San Jose, California, performed this analysis. However, Dr. Wayne Heppler, manager at De Anza Systems, categorically denied any analysis was done. He stated that De Anza Systems merely enhanced one of Meier's pictures to make parts stand out, and that the claim of authenticity was "garbage." Heppler confirmed that Jim Dilettoso and Thomas Welch visited, and that De Anza Systems lacked the technical capability for such an analysis.

Wendelle Stevens stated in an unpublished paper that Neil Davis of Design Technology in Poway, California, conducted a thorough analysis of several Meier photos. Design Technology, however, reported that their analysis was not conclusive and did not prove the validity of the photographs.

Another claim in the book is that Meier photographed a Swiss fighter attacking a UFO. The photograph shows no visible evidence of this. Genesis III claimed the pilot didn't see the UFO but tracked it on radar. The author questions how a pilot could attack something unseen and notes the UFO appears to be flying too low to be picked up on radar.

The book mentions numerous witnesses but fails to provide their statements, names, or descriptions of what they saw. Instead, it presents pictures of Meier in a room with unidentified people, which the author finds unconvincing.

Further Claims and Criticisms

Meier claimed aliens informed him they originated from the star-system "the Pleiades." The author finds this illogical, as "Pleiades" is an Earth term for a star cluster, and these stars are too young and unstable to support planets. The book also alleges Meier received over 3,000 pages of notes from aliens, containing "basic wisdom." However, these quotes are described as pseudo-religious, advocating reincarnation and pantheism.

Dr. James Hurtak, a language specialist, reviewed Meier's writings in German and described the "Senjase correspondence" as "Egyptian-Aramaic and Egyptian-Hebrew names (of divinities) and stylistic affinities" that form "latter day patchwork." He noted that this civilization, claiming to be 5,000 years in the future, offered no significant intellectual advancement over ancient civilizations.

The "Talmud Immanuel," claimed by Meier to be the true New Testament, is described as Luther's version with added passages exhibiting the same stylistic errors as Meier's German.

Meier claimed his camera had been jammed at infinity for years, hindering focus. The author questions why he didn't get it repaired if he had so many contacts, and expresses surprise at the investigators' ignorance of basic camera operation. The article explains that due to depth of field, objects between five feet and infinity should be in focus in normal daylight, and only objects closer than five feet would appear fuzzy.

Physical Evidence Analysis

The book states that "cosmonauts" gave Meier unique crystals, four metal samples, and one biological sample. Dr. Marcel Vogel tested these samples and found only one unique. The others were ordinary crystals like quartz and silver solder, not of extraterrestrial origin.

Furthermore, Dr. Vogel stated that two photos in the book, purporting to show the samples magnified, did not show the samples at all. He claimed these photos were from an IBM analysis project and were acquired by Wendelle Stevens by stealing them from his home. Stevens denied this but refused to comment on the photos' origin.

Dr. Robert E. Ogilvie of MIT also analyzed the samples and found them to be terrestrial in origin.

The book concludes with a pseudo-religious archaeological connection between the Pyramids, temples, and the Devil's Tower, linking them to the Pleiades.

Computer Analysis of Meier's Photographs (Part 2 Summary)

Part 2 of the article, mentioned at the end of page 6, details a computer analysis of ten of Meier's photographs conducted by Ground Saucer Watch Inc. The analysis utilized edge enhancement, color contouring, pixel distortion tests, and digitizing. The GSW staff concluded that all pictures were hoaxes and not evidence of extraordinary flying craft. Specific findings included: insufficient density above UFO images, UFOs being out-of-focus suggesting closeness to the camera, calculations placing UFO models at 4-6 feet distance, lack of atmospheric effects on UFOs indicating close proximity, and non-correlating shadows. They identified three types of hoax photography: suspended models with strings, double exposure, and double print methods. The analysis of specific photos suggested models of 8-12 inches in diameter and supportive structures like strings or wires. The article notes that Genesis III's computer analysis used misrepresentation, and that the UFOs were likely models, not actual craft.

General Comments on Other Meier Photographs

The article notes that the bottom portions of Meier's UFO photos are consistently dark, suggesting small models close to the camera. It also claims most photos were retouched by a laboratory in Switzerland. A specific photo showing a UFO in front of log piles is identified as a cropped version of the original, lacking a ground shadow that would be expected, suggesting it was faked by superimposing the UFO onto another picture. Another sequence of photos showing a UFO circling a tree is questioned due to cloud patterns indicating a longer time span than claimed by Genesis III, and a weather report showing winds that contradict the explanation. The site visit revealed no tree ever existed, suggesting both the tree and UFO were superimposed.

Subsequent Claims

Genesis III planned to release "UFO...Contact From The Pleiades Volume II," detailing Meier's ongoing experiences.

Summary and Conclusion

The article concludes that after reviewing all purported events and individuals involved, there is no shred of evidence to support Meier's claims. The case is deemed a grandiose and elaborate hoax, possibly the most extravagant contactee case in ufology.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout the article is the debunking of Billy Meier's claims and photographs. The author, Kal K. Korff, presents a critical and skeptical stance, meticulously analyzing evidence and interviewing experts to expose what he believes to be a fabricated case. The article strongly asserts that Meier's evidence is not authentic and that the entire case is a hoax. The editorial stance is one of rigorous investigation and exposure of fraudulent claims within the field of ufology.

Title: THE NEW NATIONAL UFO NEWSLETTER
Issue: Issue Number Two
Date: May 1981
Publisher: Cambridge UFO Research Group
Price: $1.00

This issue of The New National UFO Newsletter is heavily focused on the Eduard Meier UFO contactee case, presenting arguments and evidence to debunk it as a hoax. The cover features a collage of astronomical imagery and UFO artwork, including a prominent saucer silhouette.

Special Announcement: Expose of the Meier Hoax

The newsletter announces a 100-page expose of the Eduard Meier/UFO Contact From The Pleiades hoax, available for $7.50 plus postage. This expose is by Kal K. Korff and is described as being completely illustrated with dozens of pictures, including interviews with those perpetrating the hoax, photos of "God's Eye," and the "Cosmonauts." It also claims to include an admission by a party involved that a computer analysis was faked. Cheques or money orders should be made out to Kal K. Korff, P.O. Box 1178, Fremont, California, 94538.

CUFORN and the Meier Hoax

In the March-April 1981 issue of CUFORN, Vol. 2, No. 2, correspondence was presented regarding the Meier hoax. Larry Fenwick, editor of CUFORN, permitted the copying of correspondence written by William J. Moore, which exposes the Meier-Pleiades hoax book. A cartoon is included depicting aliens discussing fuel sources, with one alien asking for help with a road map, humorously contrasting advanced technology with mundane problems.

William L. Moore Joins CUFORN

CUFORN welcomes William L. (Bill) Moore as a member and their U.S. Consultant for the Southwestern U.S. Division. Moore is known as the co-author of "The Philadelphia Experiment: Project Invisibility" and "The Roswell Incident," the latter having sold 40,000 copies. He is also a MUFON member and has written for magazines like "UFO Report." Moore, a former playwright and high school teacher, moved from Minnesota to Arizona. He has visited Toronto twice and met CUFORN members. He possesses equipment for field investigations, including a Geiger counter and photo development lab. CUFORN anticipates future written contributions from him.

MUFON 1982 Planning Stage

Henry McKay, MUFON's Provincial Director for Ontario, is currently obtaining price quotations for hotel convention space in Toronto for the 1982 MUFON Convention. This will be the first international convention for a major UFO organization held in Toronto. CUFORN members will be informed once a hotel is selected. Nine CUFORN members are also MUFON members, and those in the Toronto area are encouraged to assist McKay.

Moore Exposes the Meier-Pleiades Hoax Book

This section details the expose of the Eduard Meier-"Genesis III" book, "UFO...Contact from the Pleiades," described as the most infamous hoax in UFO literature, priced at $25.00. Bill Moore of CUFORN had previously warned readers of "UFO Report" about this literary sham. Moore stated in Toronto in October 1980 that the company supposedly performing computer analysis on Meier's photographs did no such analysis. He discovered that only sample analysis techniques were presented, not an analysis of a Meier photo. The book uses the term 'cosmonaut' instead of 'astronaut' for interplanetary travelers. Meier allegedly used three techniques for his photographic hoax.

Letter from Lee J. Elders (Intercep) to David J. Elrich (UFO Report)

Dated August 26, 1980, this letter from Lee J. Elders, Director, International Operations at Private Communications Protection Consultants (Intercep), addresses David J. Elrich, Editor of UFO Report. Elders criticizes an article by William L. Moore in the June 1980 issue of UFO Report, which he claims made questionable and damaging statements about Intercep's investigation and labeled the Eduard "Billy" Meier contactee case as "almost certainly a hoax."

Elders challenges the basis for this conclusion, questioning the evidence and sources used by Moore. He states that Intercep's investigation of the Meier case has spanned over 24 years with supportive evidence including witnesses, landing tracks, physical samples, and photographs, all of which have undergone extensive tests and have not been proven to be a hoax. He notes that the film "UFO's ARE REAL" included photographs and an overview of these events, and that the House of Lords (The English Parliament) officially requested a special presentation on the findings.

Elders disputes UFO Report's claim that the Meier case is "almost certainly a hoax," questioning the writer's basis for such a conclusion and stating that neither Intercep nor other experts involved in the original evidence examination were contacted by the writer. He accuses the writer of attempting to directly mislead the public and demands to know the sources and facts behind the statements. Elders suggests that UFO Report should ensure its writers deal only with facts concerning significant UFO cases.

Intercep is presented as a highly confidential international security/investigative firm specializing in advanced telecommunications and electronic countermeasures, responsible for protecting billions of dollars in clients' trade secrets. Thomas K. Welch, Intercep's director of US operations and an investigator on the Meier case and co-author of "UFO...CONTACT FROM THE PLEIADES, Volume I," is mentioned as being included in "Who's Who in America."

Elders concludes by stating that Intercep takes the "misleading attack" in UFO Report seriously and hopes Elrich can shed light on the problem and provide a solution within 30 days.

Letter from William L. Moore to Lee J. Elders

Dated September 22, 1980, this letter from Bill Moore responds to Lee J. Elders' letter to David J. Elrich. Moore clarifies his feelings regarding his review of the film "UFOs Are Real" and his opinions on the Eduard "Billy" Meier UFO contactee case.

Moore questions the evidence presented for the Meier case, stating that its merit relies solely on what Meier's proponents have provided. He criticizes the "deliberate suppression of potentially damning bits of information," listing examples such as the "God's eye," pterodactyl, San Francisco earthquake-time travel photos, alleged trips to Saturn, witnessing the Apollo-Soyuz linkup, and Meier's claim to be the 13th disciple of Christ. He finds the persistent "paranoid reaction to any form of criticism" suspicious.

Moore notes that virtually every major UFOlogist in the country has condemned the Meier case, listing names like Friedman, Lorenzen, Andres, Hynek, von Keviczky, Hendry, Spaulding, Oberg, and Clark, and states that his associate Charles Berlitz also does not stand behind Meier. He emphasizes the "remarkable show of unity" among these UFOlogists, who often disagree on other cases, suggesting this consensus points to a lack of credibility for Meier and his associates. Moore states that when such a group deems a case likely a fraud, he places significant weight on their judgment.

Moore finds it offensive that someone would offer $25 for "proof-positive" of UFO contact from the Pleiades, only to find that the promised evidence was withheld pending a second volume. He states he has no objection to honest profit but draws a line. He also criticizes the "curious penchant for making recurrent threats to take legal action against those who question the validity of Pleiades," citing a recent threat against Colman von Keviczky. Moore argues that instead of refuting claims, the approach is a "cheap attack on copyright grounds," driven by profit motive and fear of exposure.

Moore questions the offer to Kal Korff of Fremont, California, to provide evidence with the proviso that findings not be discussed except with Genesis III representatives, viewing this as an attempt to "shut off the opposition" rather than open-minded scientific examination.

He suggests that the preoccupation with Colonel Wendelle Stevens is an attempt to exploit his Air Force credentials for credibility. Moore questions why, if the Meier case is so compelling, credible UFOlogists like Hynek, Friedman, or even Walter Cronkite or the Pope aren't involved, implying Stevens is the best prop available.

Moore draws a parallel to the 1917 "Our Lady of Fatima" apparition in Portugal, which produced tens of thousands of witnesses and was endorsed by the Church. He contrasts this with Meier's alleged "recurring apparitions" in Switzerland, questioning why the faithful haven't materialized and why there are only "over two dozen witnesses" whose names and addresses are not provided. He finds it staggering that if Meier photographed the "Eye of God," the result is a privately published $25 book rather than a sainthood candidate.

Regarding the House of Lords invitation, Moore clarifies it was from the Earl of Clancarty, a member of the House of Lords, not the entire House. The "closed session" with Col. Stevens was in a conference room with only about thirty members present, not on the House floor. Moore implies that the House of Commons might not take Clancarty's ideas seriously.

Moore urges the recipients to acknowledge the truth, suggesting their reputations are suffering. He warns that further foolishness could lead to a hot-shot exposé reporter investigating, potentially causing another scandal like Frank Scully/True Magazine. He advises abandoning Meier before he destroys them.

Moore challenges them to resolve the Meier controversy by forming a three-member panel of experts to examine all evidence and publish a final report. He suggests Stanton T. Friedman and Col. Wendelle Stevens as potential members.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the critical examination and debunking of the Eduard Meier UFO contactee case. The editorial stance is clearly against the authenticity of Meier's claims, presenting evidence and arguments from various sources, including William L. Moore and Kal K. Korff, to support the conclusion that the case is a hoax. The newsletter also touches upon the broader UFOlogy community, highlighting disagreements and the importance of scientific method and credible evidence. The role of organizations like CUFORN and MUFON in investigating and disseminating information on UFO phenomena is also discussed.

This document is a collection of correspondence and reports related to UFO research, primarily from the Cambridge UFO Research Group. The main focus revolves around the Meier case, the analysis of alleged alien body photographs, and the debunking of claims regarding alien bodies stored at Wright-Patterson Field. The documents date from October 1980 to May 1981.

Correspondence Regarding the Meier Case

William L. Moore, in a letter dated October 24, 1980, addresses "Larry" (likely Larry Fenwick of CUFORN) regarding the Meier case. Moore proposes that two named panel members, potentially including Stanton T. Friedman and Colman von Keviczky, be empowered to choose a third impartial member from the scientific community. He states that if the panel's judgment favors the case, it would provide strong backing for the associated books. Conversely, if the judgment goes against it, the matter should be dropped. Moore expects a decision within thirty days and intends to seek publication of his letter. He notes that a lack of response from "Genesis III" (presumably associated with Lee J. Elders) to a previous letter indicates a refusal to present their evidence to a qualified forum, which he views as a significant step toward solving the controversy.

Analysis of Alien Body Photos

Several documents focus on the analysis of photographs purported to show alien bodies. An "Updated Report" from the Coalition of Concerned Ufologists addresses an "alien body photo case and ufo crash of 1948." They state that some ufologists have manipulatively claimed the photos show "monkeys" used in V-2 rocket experiments. The report includes a statement from Anthony J. Perzigian, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Anthropology at the University of Cincinnati. Perzigian examined photographs and descriptions related to the Mexican UFO incident on July 7, 1948. He notes the specimen's unusual characteristics, such as a large head-to-body ratio and the absence of lips, tongue, teeth, thumbs, toes, ears, nose, genitals, and hair, concluding it does not appear to be of natural earthly origin. However, he expresses doubt about an extra-terrestrial origin due to the specimen's superficial resemblance to earth-like creatures, suggesting it might be a "crude, man-like robot." He reiterates his puzzlement regarding the specimen's origins in a subsequent letter to Earl D. Jones.

Another report discusses a letter from Professor Perzigian to Mr. Len Stringfield concerning his "alleged" second set of photos. The Coalition of Concerned Ufologists criticizes Stringfield for keeping these photos secret and challenges him to present them for research. They also mention working with a "world famous hospital burn institute" to examine their photos.

Perzigian also provided an analysis to Mr. Leonard Stringfield on November 15, 1980, regarding photographs of an unusual creature. He described a simian-like thoracic anatomy but limbs with no particular simian features, an unusually long upper arm, indistinct wrist region, possibly fewer than five fingers, and claws instead of nails. He stated he could not classify the organism and hesitated to suggest it was extra-terrestrial or a fabrication based solely on two photos.

Refutation of Alien Bodies at Wright-Patterson Field

Russ Reardon, in a letter dated May 17, 1981, to "Bonnie," refutes claims published in several articles that the US Government, Air Force, and CIA are withholding information about "alien space being bodies" in "deep freeze" at Wright-Patterson Field, Dayton, Ohio. Reardon cites a statement from retired Lt. Col. Robert Oakley, a parachutist with five patents, who worked at Wright Field from 1946 to 1952 and again from 1956 to 1959. Oakley asserts that "they never had and DO NOT NO. have, an: UFO items there at all. No bodies. No vehicles." He states he would have heard of anything like this from his boss, who was present at Wright Field the entire time.

Other Mentions

An article on "UFO Crash and Alien Body Photos" was published in the December 1980 issue of the newsletter. An article titled "Crashed Saucers and Pickled Aliens" was published in Fate magazine in March and April 1981, and the newsletter's editor thought it appropriate to copy and attach it.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in these documents include the skepticism surrounding UFO claims, the importance of scientific analysis and verification, and the critique of sensationalism and unsubstantiated reporting in ufology. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, demanding evidence and challenging secrecy, while also acknowledging the possibility of genuine unexplained phenomena. There is a clear effort to debunk hoaxes and misinformation, particularly concerning alleged alien bodies and government cover-ups.

This issue of 'In Search' magazine, dated winter 1980-81, features a two-part cover story titled "CRASHED SAUCERS AND PICKLED ALIENS" by George W. Earley. The main cover headline poses the question: "Is the United States government covering up the biggest secret of all time — its possession of captured UFOs?" The issue also includes an article on "Ghost Travels Free" by Mathew J. Bowyer and "These Wonderful Aliens... The UFO People" by Alex Saunders.

Part 1: Crashed Saucers and Pickled Aliens

George W. Earley's article begins by referencing the 1947 Kenneth Arnold sighting and the early term "flying saucers." He notes that while initially dismissed, the idea of crashed UFOs and recovered alien bodies gained traction, particularly through Frank Scully's 1950 book "Behind the Flying Saucers." Despite Scully's book being discredited, the "retrievals of the third kind" theory, as proponent Leonard Stringfield calls it, has seen a resurgence.

The typical narrative involves the military quickly securing a crash site, silencing civilian witnesses through threats or appeals to patriotism, and then transporting the saucer and its deceased occupants to a secure facility, often identified as Building 18 at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio. Civilian and military scientists are sworn to secrecy.

Earley then critically examines the logistical challenges of such retrievals, focusing on transportation. He highlights that many alleged crashes occurred before the development of the U.S. interstate highway system, when roads were narrower and less developed. He questions how large saucers, some reportedly 50-100 feet in diameter, could have been transported over these roads, especially from remote desert crash sites. He points out that even modern heavy-lift helicopters like the Sikorsky Sky Crane (12.5 tons) and Boeing Vertol Chinook (14 tons) would have been insufficient for the loads involved in the early days. He contrasts the purported covert transport of UFOs with the highly publicized, multi-state convoy required to move a 107-ton superconducting magnet in 1979, which involved extensive planning and escort vehicles.

Similarly, rail transportation is deemed problematic due to dimensional limitations, with width limits on cargo being around 12 feet on many routes, and height restrictions posing further issues, especially with tunnels. Disassembling the saucers is suggested as a possibility, but this would result in anonymous parts, contradicting the idea of a single, identifiable "flying saucer" being transported.

Earley also touches upon the issue of "alien autopsies," questioning who would perform them and where, and the credibility of witnesses bound by secrecy oaths. He notes that despite the claims, no one has been prosecuted under laws like Section 798 of Title 18 of the U.S. Code for releasing UFO information, suggesting that the government's consistent denial of UFO phenomena makes prosecuting such leaks counterproductive.

Part 2: Crashed Saucers and Pickled Aliens

In the second part, Earley continues his investigation into the claims of recovered alien bodies. He references Leonard Stringfield's estimate of 50 to 75 alien corpses being stored. He describes these alleged aliens as "child-sized," typically four to five feet tall, with large, slanted eyes, narrow waists, thin limbs, and thumbless, possibly webbed fingers.

Earley discusses the potential locations for performing detailed autopsies, suggesting that facilities like the Walter Reed Medical Center or the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology would be necessary. He also mentions quarantine facilities at the Johnson Space Center as a potential site, drawing a parallel to the precautions taken after astronauts returned from space. However, he notes that his source, a respected medical professional, is unaware of any alien autopsy activity and believes that a secret of such magnitude involving potentially 100 specialists would be extremely difficult to keep for over 30 years.

He recounts several anecdotal claims Stringfield has gathered, including a dying woman's confession, a son's report of his father seeing UFOs and alien bodies at Wright-Patterson in 1953, and a former guard's vague tidbits. Earley dismisses these accounts as "twaddle," emphasizing that they are anecdotal and lack documentation. He reiterates that secondhand stories, deathbed confessions, sworn testimonials, and even photographs are not proof, and without verifiable evidence, such reports remain mere speculation.

Earley concludes that while the theory of extraterrestrial UFOs deserves a better hearing, basing it on "flimsy evidence and credulous acceptance" does a disservice to the subject. He stresses the need for hard-nosed, critical examination of claims and the production of verifiable evidence.

Other Articles

"Ghost Travels Free" by Mathew J. Bowyer: This article recounts a personal experience of feeling a profound connection to the spirits of the dead while visiting European historical sites, leading to contemplation on the nature of ghosts and their ability to travel across distances, such as oceans.

"These Wonderful Aliens... The UFO People" by Alex Saunders: Published in 'In Search' magazine, this article explores the possibility of extraterrestrial life and UFOs. Saunders discusses the universal presence of elements essential for life and suggests that UFOs might originate from our galaxy, distant galaxies, or even from unseen parallel universes or dimensions. He references science fiction authors like Robert A. Heinlein and Kenneth Bulmer for speculative ideas about interstellar travel and planetary relocation. The article also touches upon a reported UFO encounter in Falkville, Alabama, involving police chief Jeff Greenhaw, and includes anecdotal accounts of other UFO sightings in Alabama.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The dominant theme throughout Earley's articles is a critical and skeptical examination of UFO crash retrieval claims. The editorial stance is one of demanding verifiable evidence and logical consistency, particularly concerning the logistical and practical challenges of UFO retrievals and the handling of alleged alien bodies. The magazine appears to encourage open investigation of UFO phenomena but strongly cautions against accepting unsubstantiated claims or anecdotal evidence without rigorous scrutiny. The other articles explore themes of spiritual experiences and the scientific and speculative possibilities of extraterrestrial life and UFO origins, reflecting a broad interest in the unexplained and the unknown.

Title: UFO REPORT
Issue: 19
Volume: 1
Date: 1979 (Issue date raw: 19)
Publisher: UFO REPORT
Country: USA
Language: English
Price: $2.50

This issue of UFO REPORT, dated 1979, focuses on the theme of alien encounters and the possibility of extraterrestrial life. The cover prominently features the headline "ALIENS ARE HERE!" and promotes books related to UFO experiences and future predictions.

Article: Jeff Greenhaw's Encounter

The issue begins with an account of an encounter by Police Chief Jeff Greenhaw. He reported seeing a creature not of this world on a gravel road. The alien was described as humanoid, featureless, and covered in a metallic material with an antenna on its head. When Greenhaw approached, the creature advanced, and he managed to take four pictures before it fled at incredible speed when he activated his patrol car's blue flashing lights. Greenhaw pursued in his patrol car but lost sight of the entity, which disappeared instantaneously. This experience transformed Greenhaw from a non-believer to a staunch supporter of alien life, though it also led to his divorce from his wife, Pamela.

The article discusses how confronted aliens often act in ways that are not understandable to humans, exhibiting unorthodox behavior such as fantastic speed, waddling, floating, bouncing, leaping to excessive heights, and displaying astonishing strength. They are also described as seemingly invulnerable to conventional weapons. The phenomenon of appearing and disappearing in a brief instant is highlighted, suggesting that their perception of time and their universe may differ significantly from ours, possibly existing in a six-dimensional or other dimensional universe.

Scientific Perspectives on Extraterrestrial Life

The magazine references astronomers who believe in other-world intelligences. Notably, it mentions Carl Sagan, former director of the Laboratory for Planetary Studies at Cornell University, and Joseph Shmuelovich Shklovsky of Moscow State University. Their joint effort, the book "INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE," published in 1966, is cited as a significant work exploring the strong possibility of extraterrestrial life existing in our galaxy. The article notes Sagan's early fascination with science fiction and prehistoric animals, and Shklovsky's background as a theoretical radio astronomer and astrophysicist. It also includes a quote from Shklovsky in 1978, contemplating humanity's potential for space travel evolution over millions of years.

Book Advertisements and Promotions

Several advertisements for books are featured:

• "MY FRIEND FROM BEYOND EARTH" by Val Thor (revised enlarged edition with special chapter). This book is promoted for personal experiences on a UFO, details about alien appearance, and information about Earth's future not found in newspapers. It costs $4.50 plus postage.
• "PARADE OF THE PLANETS" compiled by Dr. Frank E. Stranges. This compilation is priced at $2.50 for a single copy or $6.00 for three copies, with orders to be sent to I.E.C., INC.
• "A NEW WORLD CRISIS IS AT HAND..." This section warns of a significant event predicted for December 1982, involving the conjunction of nine planets with Earth, referred to as "THE GREAT CONJUNCTION."

Comic Strip: Herman

A "Herman" comic strip by Jim Unger is included, featuring a character named Harry who claims to have made friends with a guy named Ralph on Mars via radio, and that Ralph is coming to visit. Another character dismisses Harry as "a real cuckoo."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO sightings, alien encounters, and the scientific and speculative exploration of extraterrestrial life. The editorial stance appears to be one that takes UFO phenomena seriously, presenting witness accounts and scientific opinions that support the existence of alien intelligence. There is a strong emphasis on the mysterious and often inexplicable nature of alien behavior and technology, as well as a forward-looking perspective on humanity's potential interaction with and exploration of space, underscored by predictions of planetary alignments and future advancements.