Cosmic Awareness - 1984 04 - nuclear war religion fear psychology the beast constitution light worker patriotism russia

Magazine Overview

Title: Revelations of Awareness
Issue: 84-4
Date: Copyright 1984
Publisher: Cosmic Awareness Communications
Price: $3.00

This issue of 'Revelations of Awareness' presents a message from Cosmic Awareness, communicated through Paul Shockley, focusing on themes of peace, patriotism, and the dangers of nuclear war. The cover features a crowd holding American flags and peace signs, with the Capitol building in the background, under the headline "Lightworkers...Peacemakers.... It's time to RECAPTURE OUR..." The publication aims to help people become aware and transition into a New Age of spiritual consciousness.

Cosmic Awareness: Global and Political Commentary

Cosmic Awareness begins by noting significant changes since its previous communication in November 1983. While war fever, heightened by the Korean airliner incident and the deployment of missiles in Europe, had initially risen, it has since dropped considerably. This decrease is partly attributed to the sobering effect of the movie 'The Day After,' which served as a warning against potential destruction. The Awareness suggests that such negative imagery, like warning signs on a road, can be positive by alerting people to danger and preventing them from proceeding on a destructive path.

The publication criticizes the administration's deployment of missiles, viewing it as a military victory that has come at a high cost to political support, both domestically and internationally. This loss of support makes countries more vulnerable and weakens alliances like NATO. The Awareness predicts that governments that have supported this plan may face replacement unless they regain public support.

Russia's Paranoid Scenario

Regarding Russia, the Awareness indicates that the Soviets are highly paranoid about a potential nuclear strike. A feared scenario involves U.S. forces attacking Moscow, possibly using neutron bombs, followed by an invasion from underground. This scenario is seen as a way to capture Moscow without the U.S. public being aware, especially if communication satellites are disabled. The Awareness also notes the concern about conventional nuclear weapons being used against military bases.

Another concern is the possibility of another incident, similar to the KAL airliner event, being triggered to whip up war fever in the U.S. and create an excuse for launching a retaliatory strike.

True Patriotism Defined

This section clarifies the concept of patriotism, stating it is not loyalty to leaders but loyalty to the principles on which a nation is built. The Awareness warns against blindly following leaders who may lead the nation away from its core principles, labeling such loyalty as treasonous. It addresses the embarrassment some entities feel about the flag being used for anti-American purposes, such as in military actions for corporate gain, and urges individuals not to be manipulated into feeling unpatriotic.

The U.S. Constitution is lauded as a great document providing freedom and opportunities. The problem, according to Awareness, lies not in patriotism to the Constitution itself, but in the distortion of what patriotism means. This distortion is attributed to manipulation through elections, funding, and organized campaign systems, where leaders, often puppets of corporations, use patriotic rhetoric to serve vested interests.

The Awareness encourages true Americans to stand for the nation's founding principles of freedom and democracy, distinguishing this true America from the one controlled by corporate powers. It emphasizes the need to preserve the Constitution and the freedoms it guarantees.

The Growth of Doublespeak

This section discusses the increasing use of 'Doublespeak' and 'Newspeak,' as described by George Orwell, in contemporary language. Examples include terms like 'positive deficit' to describe economic issues, which, while negative, are presented with a positive spin to mislead. The Awareness warns that such language can be used to justify atrocities, describing the slaughter of innocents as 'pacification' or 'creation of greater national security.' This manipulation of language is designed to prevent the mind from recoiling at the reality of events.

The Awareness notes that while the immediate danger of nuclear war may seem diminished, the war fever can quickly resurface. It points out a pattern of major incidents occurring on Sundays, suggesting this is when manipulators choose to affect the mass-mind, as people are more likely to be home and watching the news.

Flags for Peace... (Freaking out Falwell)

The Awareness suggests that promoting peace while carrying American flags can confuse and disarm ultraconservatives who equate opposition to the administration with being pro-Russian. It argues that true Americans should embrace the nation's history of freedom and democracy, rather than the war-mongering aspect that sees enemies everywhere.

The Symbolism of the Nuclear Skull and Warning Images

This section addresses the use of the nuclear skull symbol, superimposed on an image of a nuclear explosion, which appeared on the cover. The Awareness explains that this was not an earthly artist's creation but a warning from higher forces about the imminent danger of nuclear weapons. The skull symbol has historically been used to represent poison and serves as a warning.

The Awareness acknowledges that some entities may find the image offensive or obscene, but states that individual interpretations vary. It suggests that some may recoil in fear, while others, being courageous, can see beyond the frightening imagery to the intention behind it – to drive away illness or danger. The Awareness compares this to a witch doctor wearing a terrifying mask to heal.

It is argued that warning signs, like those on a highway, are not meant to encourage disaster but to alert people to potential dangers. However, the Awareness cautions that if warning images are repeated too often, they can lose their shock value and become suggestions, leading to subconscious acceptance of the depicted events.

The Most Negative Thing in Many Homes

This section discusses how images can become suggestive rather than warning if their shock value diminishes. The Awareness identifies the cross of crucifixion as a common negative image in homes, symbolizing martyrdom. While intended to represent self-sacrifice, it can lead entities to self-sacrifice without fully understanding the implications or the true meaning of love and concern for others.

The Awareness emphasizes that entities should examine their homes for such suggestive images and remove them if they are affecting the subconscious negatively. It also touches upon the concept of 'The Beast' and 'Second Coming' in relation to consciousness evolution and the potential for manipulation through fear.

The Psychology of Fear and Positive Thinking

The Awareness discusses the concept of fear and its role in creating negative outcomes. It suggests that entities should not shy away from confronting fears but should look at them with courage. The publication criticizes the idea of solely focusing on positive thinking, arguing that it can lead to avoidance of reality and a failure to address dangers. It uses the example of Jesus, who faced suffering, to illustrate that a life without acknowledging hardship is not necessarily the path.

The Nuclear Skull Symbol and Reconciliation

Regarding the nuclear skull symbol and the 'Reconciliation, YES, Annihilation, NO' message, the Awareness clarifies that these are temporary symbols meant to shock and repel the mind from the concept of nuclear war. It suggests that as the shock wears off, the symbols should fade. The Awareness also addresses objections to the image, stating that while some may be offended, the intention is to serve as a warning against the destructive nature of nuclear weapons.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the dangers of nuclear war, the importance of true patriotism rooted in principles rather than blind loyalty, and the power of consciousness and awareness in navigating global events. The publication advocates for a return to the founding ideals of America and the U.S. Constitution, warning against corporate influence and the manipulation of language and imagery. The editorial stance is one of urging entities to become aware, to question, and to discern truth for themselves, using symbols and messages as warnings to guide humanity toward peace and away from destruction.

Title: Revelations of Awareness
Issue: 83-24
Date: December 1983
Publisher: Cosmic Awareness Communications
Country: USA
Language: English

This issue of Revelations of Awareness is divided into two primary sections: a call for the adoption of a 'No First Use' nuclear policy and an argument that the US income tax is a voluntary obligation.

'No First Use' Nuclear Policy

The publication asserts that the symbol and concept of 'No First Use' have had a significant effect on public discourse, leading to discussions about reconciliation and a potential shift away from the threat of nuclear annihilation. It notes that the movie 'The Day After' and other protests have contributed to a national reflection on the march towards war, creating a hesitation and a need for re-evaluation.

The core argument is that the 'No First Use' project is timely, especially in light of Russia and China's public pledges to this effect at the United Nations. Russia's resolution on December 28th, extending the pledge from nuclear weapons to 'No First Use of Force,' is highlighted as a significant development. The article criticizes the United States for not renouncing its policy of 'First Use,' which it claims creates an extreme threat to Russia, especially with missiles positioned near Soviet borders.

Promoting the 'No First Use' concept is presented as an opportunity to foster meaningful and less threatening dialogues between the US and the Soviet Union. The publication suggests that if Russia feels less threatened, it will be less pressured to respond aggressively. The argument against 'No First Use' by the US, which cites Soviet strength in conventional warfare, is countered by the Russian 'No First Use of Force' announcement, which is seen as a guideline for foreign policy.

The issue encourages entities to seize this moment to promote peace and the 'No First Use' concept, particularly during election campaigns when presidential candidates are vulnerable to public influence. Sandy Champion, Vice Chairman of the 'No First Use Committee in California,' is mentioned for having received endorsements from notable figures like Linus Pauling and for engaging with Jesse Jackson on the concept.

The article notes that two months prior, the idea that America had not pledged 'No First Use' while Russia and China had would have been met with disbelief, but now this information is becoming publicly known, indicating that the administration's desire for secrecy is being overcome.

Income Tax: A Voluntary Tax?

The second major section of the magazine challenges the mandatory nature of income tax in the United States. It begins by stating that 'FOR INDIVIDUALS, INCOME TAX IS A VOLUNTARY TAX,' a claim that is presented as initially skeptical but explained through constitutional interpretation.

The core argument is that the U.S. Constitution forbids the federal government from imposing any tax directly upon individuals. It posits that individuals voluntarily impose an income tax upon themselves when they file an income tax return.

The article traces this argument back to the historical context of the American Revolution, where direct taxation was a major grievance. It cites Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article 1, Section 9, Clause 4 of the Constitution, which mandate that direct taxes must be apportioned among the states based on population. These sections are presented as never having been repealed or amended.

The 16th Amendment, often cited as authorizing income tax, is claimed to have been misinterpreted (deliberately, according to the text). The publication refers to the Supreme Court case *Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. R. Co.* (1916), which it states ruled that the 16th Amendment created no new power of taxation and did not change the constitutional limitations on direct taxes. The Court's ruling that income tax is an 'excise' tax, not a direct tax, is emphasized.

The article then defines excise taxes as taxes on the manufacture, sale, or consumption of commodities, licenses to pursue certain occupations, and corporate privileges. It argues that individuals, not being commodities or corporations, are not subject to excise taxes unless they are granted a license for a special privilege, such as a lawyer. Occupations of common right, like laborer, factory worker, or doctor, are not subject to income (excise) tax.

Deceptive wording by the IRS and other propagandists is blamed for creating confusion. The IRS's own publications are cited, acknowledging that compliance with filing returns is voluntary, even while suggesting it is mandatory. A former IRS commissioner is quoted stating that American taxpayers 'voluntarily file their tax returns,' and the Supreme Court case *U.S. v. Flora* (1960) is cited for stating that the U.S. system is based on 'voluntary assessment and payment, not upon distraint.'

The article explains that while the term 'voluntary compliance' seems contradictory, it is accurate because individuals engaged in common right occupations are not subject to the income (excise) tax, making their compliance voluntary.

It further argues that there are 'NO CRIMES FOR INDIVIDUALS' regarding income tax, as individuals not subject to the tax cannot be subject to tax-related criminal penalties. Section #7343 of the Internal Revenue Code is cited, stating that 'person' subject to criminal penalties does not include an individual acting in their common right capacity.

The publication explains how citizens are 'trapped' by judges who uphold the 'system' and by jury instructions that lead to convictions even when no crime has been committed. It asserts that if an individual is not subject to the income (excise) tax, not filing a return or not paying the tax is not a crime.

• Key facts highlighted include:
• Individuals are not legally required to file income tax returns.
• Wages, salaries, and tips are not legally defined as 'income.'
• The Constitution forbids direct federal taxes on individuals.
• The 16th Amendment did not authorize a direct income tax on individuals.
• Income tax is an excise tax, primarily on corporations and special privileges.

The article concludes by stating that the income tax has created havoc in America's economy, leading to loss of liberty and harassment by the IRS. It calls for citizens to become informed, share the information, and resist abuses of their rights, emphasizing that the Constitution is a precious document of freedom that depends on the people's will to enforce its guarantees.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are peace, nuclear disarmament, and individual liberty, particularly concerning taxation. The editorial stance is strongly critical of government overreach, particularly the IRS and its practices, and advocates for a more peaceful international policy through 'No First Use.' It champions individual rights and constitutional interpretations that challenge established government authority, especially in the realm of taxation. The publication promotes an active, informed citizenry as essential for preserving freedom and influencing policy.