Catalogue retro 1984-85

Magazine Overview

This document is a digital edition from 2006 of the "CATALOGUE ANNUEL RÉGIONAL CNEGU ANNÉE 1984-85" (Annual Regional Catalogue CNEGU Year 1984-85). It serves as a compilation of alleged unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) observations from the years 1984 and 1985, primarily focusing on reports from France.

Introduction and Methodology

The catalogue is presented as a non-exhaustive, chronological list of known UAP observations. The introductory 'AVERTISSEMENT' (Warning) section clarifies that the information contained may not have been verified, may have been the subject of detailed investigations, or might include hoaxes or misidentifications. Each entry typically provides essential details such as dates, times, locations, witness information, and a brief description of the phenomenon. A simplified map accompanies the list, featuring only cases with a Quality Index (IQ) of 3 or higher, which supersedes the previous Credibility Index.

The stated purpose of the catalogue is to present a synthetic overview of observations from a region, making them accessible in a single document for informational and reference purposes. Readers seeking more detailed information are directed to contact CNEGU member groups or the original sources.

Catalogued Observations (1984)

The catalogue details numerous sightings from 1984:

• April 26, 1984: In Chantraine-Epinal, a red object with a blinking yellow light was observed moving east to west at an altitude of 500-1000m, with an apparent size of 30' arc. Its speed was estimated to be three times that of a high-altitude aircraft. It stopped, turned 90 degrees, and disappeared, appearing to descend.
• August 11, 1984: Between Haironville and Rupt-aux-Nonains, three individuals observed a phenomenon composed of two large red 'points' superimposed, preceded by two yellow light beams. It evolved horizontally for 5-6 seconds before disappearing to the west-northwest. The phenomenon was estimated to be 2.9m high and 10m long, at a distance of 290m.
• November 13, 1984: In Granges-sur-Vologne, a young witness observed a series of round, multicolored lights forming a circular ring. The lights changed position, with most being white, and intermittent white beams emanating from the sides. This cycle repeated every two seconds.
• November 27, 1984: Near Granges-sur-Vologne, a white light beam was observed from a car, initially thought to be a projector, but its source could not be identified.
• November 30, 1984: Across the Vosges department, a significant but brief luminous phenomenon was seen, described as a 'fireball' with a multicolored trail. It was concluded to be a meteor (holide).
• December 7, 1984: In Proyères-sur-Fave, a pink 'ball' with a colored trail was observed moving east-southeast with a 'plunging' trajectory and a whistling sound. A meteor was considered a plausible explanation.
• December 10, 1984 (multiple sightings):
• In Harsault, a 'ball' of changing color (orange to green) was observed moving in small circles with sudden ascents and descents. No sound was perceived.
• In Contrexeville, a strange luminous point moved slowly across the sky, projecting sparks.
• In Proyères-sur-Fave, two yellow, scintillating 'balls' were observed, which changed color to orange and reappeared.
• December 11, 1984: In Harsault, a similar phenomenon to the previous day was observed, with the addition of the sound of four airplanes. The observation lasted about fifteen minutes.
• December 14, 1984: In Rambervillers, a luminous phenomenon was observed, consistent with a meteor (bolide).
• December 26, 1984: Near Chaumont, two motorists observed a vertical, immobile, red and orange luminous 'tube'. It disappeared after five minutes.

Catalogued Observations (1985)

Observations from 1985 include:

• June 2, 1985: In Remiremont, four hospital workers observed a large 'point' of light moving slowly upwards and slightly to the right (south) for over an hour. It was concluded to be the planet Venus observed by individuals lacking astronomical knowledge.
• June 22, 1985: Near Uxegney, two young people observed a very bright point of light moving in a straight line and disappearing over the horizon. They stated it was not an airplane due to the lack of blinking lights or color.
• June 23, 1985: Four CVLDLN members observed an orange 'point' of light ascending vertically in cloudy weather near Circourt-Dompaire.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The catalogue consistently reports luminous phenomena, often described as balls, points, or tubes, with varying colors and behaviors such as movement, blinking, and changing position. Many reports are accompanied by witness testimonies and investigations by groups like CVLDLN and Groupe 5255. While some phenomena are identified as meteors or planets (like Venus), a significant number remain unexplained, as indicated by the 'inexpliqué à ce jour' (unexplained to this day) notations. The editorial stance appears to be one of diligent reporting and investigation of UAP sightings, presenting the data objectively while acknowledging the limitations of verification and the possibility of misidentification.

This document is a catalog of observed unidentified aerospace phenomena compiled by C.N.E.G.U. (Centre National d'Études Géo-Uraniques) for the years 1934 and 1984-1985. It includes detailed descriptions of sightings, witness testimonies, and commentary on the state of Ufological research.

Catalog of Observations

The catalog lists various observations, providing a reference number, a classification code (e.g., 10:1,1,1,1,1), and a brief description. The quality index (IQ) is used, with IQ=5 being the highest.

Observation 1 (Reference F/98/88850630)

• Date: Not specified, but context implies it's from the 1984-1985 period.
• Description: A phenomenon observed at night, initially mistaken for 'fireworks'. Witnesses observed it through binoculars and took two slides. The phenomenon gradually disappeared by 'extinction'. No sound was perceived, and the estimated distance was over 7km. The apparent size was 5' arc, perfectly circular. The duration was 3 minutes and 15 seconds.
• Location: Implied to be in France, with a reference to 'bois d'Oncourt'.
• Source: Observation and Investigation CVLOLN.

Observation 2 (Reference F/98/88850906)

• Date: June 30, 1985, around 03:30 HL (01:30 TU).
• Description: Four people observed a large orange-red 'ball' whose apparent size was estimated to be larger than the moon. It was situated low in the sky, near where a luminous phenomenon was observed on December 10-11, 1984. Three witnesses followed it towards a small hill. They saw the upper part of the 'ball', with the rest partially obscured by trees. It appeared to move away over a wood. No sound was perceived, and no particular effect was felt. The report suggests a possible misidentification with the setting moon.
• Location: Implied to be in France.
• Source: Investigation CVLOLN.

Observation 3 (Reference F/98/88850900)

• Date: Night of September 8-9, 1985 (or September 15-16), around 02:50 HL (00:50 TU).
• Description: A 32-year-old man observed a violet 'glow' moving near the Remiremont/Pouxeux highway, in the trees on a hillside. The glow, without a defined shape, seemed to move within the trees for three to four seconds, shifting about ten degrees to the right. The estimated distance was 700-800m. No sound was perceived, and no particular effect was felt.
• Location: Eloyes (88), France.
• Source: Testimony received by mail. Investigation CVLDLN pending.

Observation 4 (Reference F/15/54321021)

• Date: Night of September 8-9, 1985 (or September 15-16), around 02:50 HL (00:50 TU).
• Description: A man going out to see his sheep was attracted by a sudden, very bright light above the forest. It was visible for two to three seconds and was immediately followed by the rapid passage in the sky of a blue and green 'ball', followed by a trail of sparks. In a few seconds, it crossed the local horizon. The witness, who is totally deaf, perceived no sound and felt no particular effect.
• Location: Not specified, but implied to be in France.
• Source: Testimony received by mail. Investigation CVLDLN pending.

Case from 1932 (Reference F/15/54321021)

• Date: October 21, 1932, around 18:00.
• Witness: Monsieur HENRI, 30 years old, biologist.
• Description: While in his garden, Henri observed a flying object initially mistaken for an airplane coming from the Southeast. The object descended slowly and then remained stationary ('in sustentation') about one meter above the ground for twenty minutes. He describes it as oval-shaped, approximately 1.5 meters in diameter and 0.8 meters thick. The lower half had a metallic appearance, while the upper half was filled with a blue-green color. The object emitted no sound, heat, cold, radiation, magnetism, or electromagnetism. Henri provided a sketch. He noted that the object's mass seemed very heavy and its shape closely followed the contours of his garden. During the twenty minutes, he went upstairs to take a photograph, but his camera jammed. Upon his return, the object had not moved. At the end of the observation, the object ascended vertically at a constant speed until it was out of sight. No marks were left on the ground, and the grass was neither scorched nor crushed, but simply stood up straight at the moment of departure before returning to its normal position. Henri reported the incident to his wife at 17:00 and they subsequently visited the Bureau.
• Location: Not specified, but implied to be in France.
• Source: Process-verbal of an interview, based on GEPAN's Technical Note 86/06 titled "L'AMARANTE".

Complement to Previous Catalogs

This section discusses the catalog's format and the quality index, which replaces the credibility index. It notes the low quantity of observations recorded in 1984 and 1985, making a detailed synthesis or large-scale map unnecessary. The author expresses disappointment that calls for contributions in previous editions have not been widely answered.

Commentary and Analysis

The author reflects on the state of "Private Ufology," suggesting it has a fundamental characteristic of being unable to conduct thorough research, tending to become complacent when new elements are scarce. He states that achieving significant results requires rigor, abnegation, and imagination. The author expresses a pessimistic view that the time for major progress in this field has not yet arrived.

He awaits contributions for the 1986 catalog, hoping for more fertile current events and for readers who remain sufficiently alert to continue the "ant-like" work.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the detailed documentation of UAP sightings, the challenges of Ufological investigation, and a critical assessment of the progress and methodology within the private Ufology community. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous documentation combined with a somewhat disillusioned but persistent commitment to the field, emphasizing the need for scientific discipline and dedication.

The issue highlights specific sightings with varying levels of detail and perceived reliability, ranging from brief luminous phenomena to more structured objects. The inclusion of the 1932 case, investigated by GEPAN, adds a historical and official dimension. The commentary section reveals a critical perspective on the Ufology community's engagement and its capacity for sustained, rigorous research.