Chroniques de la CLEU - Special CNEGU - No 01 - Novembre 1979

Magazine Overview

This is a special issue, No. 1, from November 1979, titled 'LES CHRONIQUES DE LA C.L.E.U.' (Commission Luxembourgeoise d'Etudes Ufologiques), with the subtitle 'SPECIAL CNEGU'. The cover features a hand-drawn map of Luxembourg with two flying saucers, one with a face, and the title in bold, stylized lettering. The magazine is printed in French and focuses on UFO (OVNI) phenomena, case studies, and analysis.

Table of Contents

The table of contents lists the following articles and sections:

• Editorial
• Codification of investigations and groups
• The OVNI phenomenon: objective or subjective reality?
• Regarding headlights, blinkers, non-blinkers, and OVNI
• OVNI Hunter
• Three discs sighted in Contern (G.D. Luxembourg)
• Prolonged observation of a flying saucer over Pont-à-Mousson
• In the Meuse, two witnesses observe a strange luminous ball
• Re-entry of a rocket into the atmosphere above the Vosges and Roanne?
• A bothersome magnetic field
• The Detractors...
• Catalogue of CNEGU observations for the year 1978
• Overflight of a Nancy neighborhood by a luminous object
• When an OVNI passes by
• Prolonged observation in Vitry-les-Nogent in Haute Marne
• Presentation of the groups forming CNEGU and membership conditions

The issue is printed by CLEU as part of CNEGU's activities.

Editorial

The editorial discusses several UFO sightings, beginning with one on January 1, 1974, in Mondercange, Luxembourg, where an OVNI was seen and photographed. Another sighting occurred on March 18, 1977, in Haute Marne, France, involving a ground-level disc and a luminous, long object seen by villagers. On September 8, 1978, near Epinal, France, a brilliant red, cigar-shaped object was observed by a family. On October 6, 1978, a rugby ball-shaped, orange object was seen over Nancy, flying low. The editorial defines an OVNI report based on M. J. Allen Hynek's criteria, emphasizing that it's a description by responsible individuals of an object or light in the sky or on the ground that cannot be identified as a known event or psychological process. It stresses the need for collective study and participation to understand this phenomenon, likening it to a puzzle. The editorial also introduces the formation of CNEGU (Comité Nord Est des Groupements Urologiques), a regional committee comprising four associations: the Luxembourgish Commission for Ufological Studies (CLEU), the Private Ufological Group of Nancy (GPUN), the Vosgian Circle 'Lights in the Night' (C.V.LDLN), and Group 5255. The goal is to coordinate common actions for better study of UFOs without forming a rigid federation.

CNEGU Activities and Codification

CNEGU aims to establish principles for common and coordinated actions among individuals and groups studying UFOs in the Northeast region. It meets quarterly for synthesis and information exchange. A key initiative is the creation of an observation file for each department and an annual regional catalogue. The importance of coordination is highlighted, especially during investigations. CNEGU members organize public conferences and issue press releases to inform the public. This special issue is part of that effort. The issue also details a codification system for investigations, comprising 7 groups of two digits: country, group code, department, year, month, day, and a sequential number for the observation. It also lists the codes for the member groups: CLEU (06), GPUN (15), C.V.LDLN (98), and Group 5255 (99). Information on time reporting is also provided, noting that times are generally legal time, with adjustments for Universal Time.

Reflections on Observations with Common Points

This section presents detailed case studies:

Observation I (Bettembourg, Luxembourg)

Translated from a December 1973 'tageblatt' article, this describes two motorists near Bettembourg observing a bright star, initially mistaken for Comet Kohoutek. They followed a phenomenon that moved over the forest of Leudelance. At about 300 meters, the object, described as having three intense white lights that flashed illogically, turned towards them. After they cut the engine and lights, the object returned to its initial trajectory. It had a central oval with pulsating lights. The object was later seen above Gasperich. The witnesses, both former aviation employees, ruled out it being an aircraft due to the lights and silent operation.

Observation II (Luxembourg Airport)

A hostess at Luxembourg Airport observed an object with three white lights on the runway, about 30 meters in diameter. She quickly realized the lights did not match aircraft positions and the object was silent. The object disappeared suddenly.

Summary 1

These two observations occurred on the same day and were sequential. The hostess's observation occurred as the witnesses from the first observation were traveling to the airport. The observations share key points: position lights, sound emission, shape, and speed. The control tower reported no radar activity, which the author notes doesn't disprove the phenomenon, as UFOs can remain invisible to radar. The author concludes it can be called a UFO, and he, along with other witnesses, confirms the reality of the object.

Observation III (Ouzouer-sur-Loire, France)

An article from Paris Match in January 1973 recounts Adjutant Gauthier's experience. He and other gendarmes observed an object several hundred meters high moving towards Gien. It was observed for ten minutes before disappearing. The Avord air base, 50 km away, did not detect it on radar. Gauthier was alerted by two women who described an object hovering above a meadow, about twenty meters high, oval-shaped with a white central light and three flashing red lights. It was about 2.50m high and 5m in diameter, immobile and silent. The women reported it to the gendarmerie. Gauthier and another gendarme went to the scene and were struck by the intensity of the white flashing light. Two days later, another resident, Mme Suzanne Dewaine, reported seeing a similar object, which she initially thought was an aircraft. She described it as silent, with air displacement sounds, and noted its powerful red and white flashing lights. Her sketch matched the drawings made by the first witnesses.

Summary 2

This summary compares the Luxembourg and Ouzouer-sur-Loire observations, finding many common points. Both occurred in the evening and lasted about ten minutes, near an airbase that did not detect them. The object was described as being about twenty meters above a meadow, with a white light. The witnesses in both cases reacted similarly by cutting off lights and engines to observe. The article notes a difference in the description of the flashing lights: the article describes 'three red lights at the beginning' and later 'intensity of the white flashing light', while the gendarmes noted 'red and white flashing lights'. However, all agree the object was silent.

Addendum

Another observation occurred on March 10, 1974, between Zoufftgen and Dudelange, Luxembourg. A couple observed an object at high altitude with three white lights in a triangular formation, which moved with sudden changes in position and without noise. The author also mentions a man found with total amnesia in January near the Leudelance forest, but no details could be obtained from the authorities. The author concludes with a philosophical note on the limits of human imagination compared to the universe.

The OVNI Phenomenon: Objective or Subjective Reality?

This section discusses the debate initiated by M. Monnerie's book, 'Et si les OVNI n'existaient pas?', which received negative reviews. The author acknowledges that the book prompted reflection on the reality of the phenomenon. While some ufologists believe their findings are proven, the author suggests that the socio-psychological theory admits the reality of the phenomenon but not necessarily the objective reality of the OVNI itself, referring to this as 'subjective reality'. The author then presents cases from the GPUN files that appear to illustrate both objective and subjective realities.

Case 1: Malzéville/Nancy (October 7, 1967)

A resident of Malzéville observed a luminous phenomenon above Nancy on a cloudy evening. Initially thought to be a flare, the object, described as a white sphere with sharp contours, appeared to smoke or produce condensation. It remained stationary, changed shape, and its color shifted to dark orange-red. It rotated, emitting a reddish mist, and then disappeared by extinction. Remarks note that the sphere's glow reflected on wet rooftops, the 'smoke' behaved according to physics, and only one witness reported it, with no press mention.

Case 2: Nancy Region (Summer 1976 Wave)

Similar phenomena were observed during a mini-wave in the summer of 1976. On July 3, between 23:30 and 24:00, three people observed a stationary luminous red glow above Art-sur-Moselle. For half an hour, the phenomenon adopted various forms (with sketches provided) without moving from its initial position, retaining its red color. It disappeared by progressive extinction, leaving a faint silhouette. Remarks indicate the manifestation lasted over half an hour, with progressive enlargements and poorly defined contours, and 'red filaments' seemed to escape from elongated forms. It disappeared suddenly, and no other testimony supported this observation.

Case 3: Tomblaine (August 1, 1976)

Two groups of witnesses observed a phenomenon in Tomblaine. A family of 7 saw a red luminous point above Nancy, which grew in importance. The sphere 'ejected' two white points that left trails, then elongated vertically into a bright orange-red crescent. A reddish mist surrounded it. The process reversed, and the crescent returned to a sphere, moving west at high speed. Remarks state the observation lasted 10 minutes, the color and luminosity remained constant, it stayed fixed at low altitude, and its contours were well-defined.

A second group, a couple, observed a white luminous phenomenon above Nancy, appearing as a vertical sugar cube. A dark cloud traversed its center and enveloped it. The couple continued driving and lost sight of the phenomenon. Remarks note that although different in appearance (shape and color), the phenomenon occupied the same part of the sky as the one described by the family.

This issue of "CHASSEUR D'OVNI" (UFO Hunter) focuses on graphic representations of observations and their phases, alongside detailed accounts and analyses of aerial phenomena. The cover features a cartoon titled "CHASSEUR D'OVNI" with a robot, alien, and flying saucer.

Graphical Representations of Observations

The magazine presents three distinct graphical representations of observations and their phases:

• Malzeville, 7/10/67: This section includes a diagram showing a progression of shapes, possibly representing the phases of an observed object, with a legend indicating 'disparition' (disappearance) and 'mouvement' (movement).
• Art-sur-Meurthe, 3/07/76: This graphic depicts a sequence of shapes, starting with a cloud-like form and evolving through various geometric and irregular shapes, including a diamond and crescent, suggesting a transformation or sequence of events.
• Tomblaine, 1/08/76: This illustration shows a series of curved shapes and disks, suggesting a dynamic movement or progression of objects.

Analysis of Aerial Phenomena and Witness Testimony

Page 2 discusses three cases observed near Nancy, noting that the phenomena were at low altitude, large, bright, and colorful (red, orange), visible for extended periods (10-30 minutes) on clear nights, yet reported by very few witnesses. It questions whether these are subjective realities or if there's a specific observational requirement. The article highlights that some witnesses are competent professionals (e.g., aeromodeling club president, reserve fighter pilot). It also notes the importance of observation point and viewing angle, suggesting that the phenomenon's appearance might vary based on location. The possibility of these manifestations being "cinema" or holograms, particularly with the advent of laser technology, is raised as a potential explanation.

Page 3 and Page 4 delve into the distinction between day and night observations, emphasizing the increased potential for error at night. The article aims to help distinguish between genuine phenomena and misidentifications, particularly of aircraft. It details the standard lighting systems of civilian and military aircraft, including wingtip lights (red on the left, green on the right), landing lights, anti-collision lights, and retractable searchlights used for inspection. The text explains the angles and functions of these lights, noting that helicopters follow similar regulations but with lights on the fuselage sides.

Page 5 provides diagrams illustrating the placement of aircraft lights, including red and white flashing lights on the tail (dérive/étambot), white flashing lights, green lights on the starboard side, and approach lights (phares d'approche) on the fuselage or landing gear. It also shows the 110° angle for wingtip lights and the placement of approach lights.

Page 6 addresses the phenomenon of seeing multiple lights at night and only one object, referencing 'SA 330 PUMA' helicopters with tight formation lights. It discusses the internal lighting of aircraft cabins, stating that it's usually minimal, with instruments individually lit. The author, René Cayrol, argues that the trajectory of a light at night is the same as its support during the day, and that nocturnal conditions do not inherently make trajectories anarchic. He cautions against attributing phenomena to secret military sources or meteorological events without sufficient understanding.

Page 7 features a cartoon titled "CHASSEUR D'OVNI," depicting a humorous scene with a robot, an alien, and a flying saucer, suggesting a lighthearted take on UFO hunting.

Page 8 presents a detailed investigation report from C.L.E.U. regarding an observation in Contern, Luxembourg, on September 16, 1976. Three witnesses reported seeing three golden, brilliant disks, approximately 7-8 cm in diameter, moving for 20 minutes. The report notes that the primary witness has an interest in OVNIs and astral projection, which slightly diminishes credibility but doesn't invalidate the account. The witness is described as intelligent and curious.

Page 9 provides an annex to the Contern investigation, including a response from the Luxembourg Airport dated December 15, 1976. The airport services reported no unidentified aircraft or radar echoes in the Contern region on the date of the sighting (September 16, 1976). The meteorological report for that date indicates good visibility (35 km) and partial cloud cover (6/8 nebulosity).

Page 10 details a prolonged observation of a flying saucer near Pont-à-Mousson on November 23, 1978. A witness, Mme G..., reported seeing a large, greenish, metallic disk with three red and orange headlights at low altitude. The object flew over her car, then circled overhead before moving north. The disk was described as approximately 10 meters in diameter with a dome, and it emitted a loud, deep noise. The observation lasted about 20 minutes, and other neighbors also heard the noise. The witness's children were frightened, and her husband was informed upon his return.

Page 6 (Note relative au croquis): This note clarifies that retractable searchlights, used for checking wing leading edges, engine intakes, or for de-icing control, are mounted at the wing roots and are maneuverable from the cockpit.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the analysis of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP/OVNI), focusing on witness testimony, object descriptions, and the challenges of identification, particularly at night. There's a clear effort to distinguish between genuine sightings and misidentifications of conventional aircraft. The possibility of advanced technology, such as holograms, being responsible for some sightings is explored. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious investigation, encouraging rational deduction while acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena. The publication aims to educate readers on aircraft identification and to critically examine UAP reports.

Title: L'ÉCHO DU MYSTÈRE
Issue: 11
Volume: 1
Date: January 1978
Publisher: Les Éditions du Mystère
Country: France
Price: 20 F
Cover Headline: OVNI: La vérité sur les phénomènes inexpliqués

This issue of L'Écho du Mystère focuses on UFO phenomena, presenting a collection of witness testimonies, investigative reports, and analyses of unexplained aerial objects. The magazine aims to uncover the truth behind these events, exploring various aspects from visual observations to potential physical and electromagnetic effects.

Case Study: Ancerville (Pages 1-4)

The issue begins with an in-depth investigation into a sighting by the G. family in Ancerville. Mme G. and her two sons reported observing a powerful projector-equipped object at high altitude. A fifth witness also contacted the journal. The newspaper "L'Est Républicain" was alerted, and the investigation was initiated. The site was visited, but no physical traces were found, and no air traffic was scheduled.

Mme G. is described as a credible witness, a mother of 30 who was frightened by the object. Her children, influenced by science fiction, initially believed the craft would land and destroy their home. Their drawings of the phenomenon were consistent. Her husband, though initially skeptical, confirmed his family's unusual state of distress upon their return.

The phenomenon is described as classic in its appearance but remarkable in its duration (nearly two hours) and the low humming sound it emitted. The possibility of a military helicopter was considered but dismissed due to the object's proximity (30m), size (10m diameter), and the denial of nearby air bases regarding any such activity.

The witnesses did not pursue photography, despite having a camera ready. The object is theorized to have taken off from a field, flown over the vehicle, and then disappeared towards the north, conducting surveillance for two hours. The investigation was conducted by GPUN.

Case Study: Ancerville (Pages 3-4)

This section details an investigation by Mrs Thomé Roger and Thomé René (group 5255) concerning two witnesses in Ancerville during the summer of 1955. René Martin, a simple and sympathetic carpenter, and Roger Pierret, a serious and sober man working at I.H.F. Saint-Dizier and a volunteer firefighter, both reported observing a strange luminous ball.

Both witnesses are deemed credible, though they were ridiculed by some friends. The weather was clear and warm, around 18°C, with a clear sky and visible stars. The phenomenon was observed at dusk.

The incident occurred on the departmental road no. 3, about 500 meters before the water tower. Around 9 PM, a brilliant orange luminous "ball" with a sharp contour appeared in the sky at about 70° above the horizon. It descended vertically towards the road, then, at about 30° above the horizon, it made a perfect 90° turn and moved horizontally towards Saint-Dizier. The object was silent and impressive.

Witnesses estimated its diameter to be about 30 cm at arm's length (0.57 m). They stated it was not an airplane, helicopter, or weather balloon, and had no wings, insignia, or position lights. They were familiar with military aircraft from the nearby 113th Air Base and insisted their sighting was unlike any modern aircraft.

Despite their fear, the object had no discernible physical or psychological effect on them. They did not report the incident to the gendarmerie due to fear of ridicule. René Martin described the energy inside the orange ball and its silent, strange movement. The mystery of this "unidentified object" remains for the witnesses.

Catalogue of Observations (Pages 5-10)

This section presents a chronological catalog of UFO observations, primarily from January to April 1978, with some earlier entries.

• January 1978:
• Jan 10, 1978 (Chamouilley): A witness saw an orange, banana-shaped object moving northwest, transforming its shape and accelerating rapidly.
• Jan 15, 1978 (Troisfontaines): A motorist observed a strange object with green and red lights.
• Jan 15, 1978 (Guebling): Alain Masson, a young cyclist, was followed by three white-glowing UFOs, one of which illuminated him with a light beam.
• Jan 17, 1978 (Angerville-Gue): Two brothers observed a large, circular, orange luminous light, static and silent. A circular trace, approximately 10 meters in diameter, was later discovered nearby, with abnormally tall and green grass within the ring.

• February 1978:
• Feb 18, 1978 (Rupt-aux-Nonains): A young woman saw a static, low-horizon object shaped like a vertical crescent with a round, spherical center, colored canary yellow, which then disappeared.
• Feb 21, 1978 (Reims): Seven people observed a fast-moving white light, like a neon tube, ending in a fuseau shape, moving from east to west.

• March 1978:
• March 1978 (Saint-Paul and Dommartin): Béatrice de Belly observed a luminous object, appearing as two white spheres joined by a bright red bar, which was immobile and then disappeared.

• April 1978:
• April 1978 (Nancy): Two people observed a fast-moving vertical green and red conical object.
• April 1, 1978 (Vandoeuvre): A couple observed a long, immobile cigar-shaped object with diffuse contours, which gradually faded out. Two photos were taken.
• April 1978 (Epinal): A woman observed an orange "cigar" object with a yellow halo, moving from east to west without noise or change in direction.

• Other Observations:
• Cornimont (Dec 2, 1978): A phenomenon was observed for 30 seconds, described as a somewhat elongated yellow shape, projecting a weaker conical beam, moving horizontally and then vertically upwards before disappearing.
• Rupt sur Moselle (undated): Mme L. observed a similar luminous phenomenon, described as a vertical cylindrical shape with two conical beams, which disappeared quickly.
• Epinal (undated): Eric Bitterly saw a luminous trail and two yellow-orange beams moving forward at high altitude.

The section also lists other reported sightings in the Vosges region (Epinal, Contrexéville, Vittel-Darney, Bulgnéville) and elsewhere in France (Roanne, Propieres, Dracé), as well as cases in Meurthe et Moselle. The natural explanation suggested for some phenomena is the re-entry of a rocket into the atmosphere.

Un Champ Magnétique Génant (Page 7)

This article discusses the electromagnetic effects associated with UFOs. It states that UFOs can cause paralysis in witnesses and create power outages. The powerful magnetic fields generated by these craft are highlighted, with measurements of up to 10 million gauss recorded in Antarctica. The article explains how these fields can disrupt car ignitions and even cause massive power failures, citing an incident at Niagara Falls in 1965.

Furthermore, the heat generated by induction currents can cause symptoms resembling electrocution in witnesses, including tingling, numbness, and temporary paralysis. While this may reduce fear, it is advised to maintain distance from such craft due to potential overloads. The article concludes that these effects are not due to the occupants' animosity but to the complexity of their propulsion systems and their impact on the unprepared environment.

Les Détracteurs (Page 8)

A satirical cartoon depicts two figures, presumably rationalists or skeptics, dismissing UFOs as mere imagination of witnesses. One figure is applauded after a conference, while the other declines a ride home, stating his vehicle is waiting in the parking lot, implying a more conventional mode of transport.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently presents witness testimonies as credible, even when they face skepticism or ridicule. The investigations aim to corroborate these accounts and explore potential explanations, ranging from conventional aircraft to more anomalous phenomena. There is a clear interest in the physical and electromagnetic effects of UFOs, suggesting a belief in their tangible impact. The publication appears to lean towards the reality of UFOs as unexplained phenomena, while acknowledging the possibility of natural explanations in some cases. The inclusion of a satirical cartoon suggests an awareness of and perhaps a subtle critique of the skeptical viewpoint within the UFO community.

This issue of "LUMINEUX" focuses on UFO (OVNI) sightings and related phenomena reported in France during October and November 1978, with a particular emphasis on detailed witness accounts and the physical and electromagnetic effects associated with these events. The magazine also provides information on various ufological research groups and their activities.

UFO Sightings and Encounters

The issue presents a series of documented sightings, each with a reference number, date, location, and witness testimony. These reports detail a variety of aerial phenomena:

• November 23, 1978, Pont-à-Mousson (54): A mother and her sons witnessed a large, red-orange, disk-shaped object with an opaque cupola, emitting a loud, disorienting noise. The object hovered over a field before flying away, and witnesses observed it performing large loops for two hours.
• November 29, 1978, Nancy and surrounding areas (54): Multiple witnesses across the city reported an orange, elliptical luminous phenomenon flying at a regular speed.
• December 1978, Cornimont, Saulxures-sur-Moselotte: Four witnesses observed a yellow luminous object approaching horizontally, projecting a conical beam. It then ascended vertically and disappeared in full view after about 30 seconds, with no accompanying sound or odor.
• December 1978, Rupt-sur-Moselle: Witness Mine Laheurte reported a luminous cylindrical object in a vertical position, projecting four luminous rays. It disappeared in full view after about thirty seconds without any sound.
• December 1978, Epinal (between 17h and 18h): Three witnesses observed an orange-red UFO moving from southwest to northeast, projecting a V-shaped luminous beam. The object maintained a rectilinear trajectory and disappeared behind a building after about ten seconds.
• December 1978, Epinal (ZUP): Two luminous beams were observed for 15 seconds, followed by an extinction and a luminous trail towards the west.
• December 1978, Epinal: Two witnesses observed a white 'half-sphere' with luminous branches descending, followed by an explosion without sound.
• December 1978, Contrexéville: Witness M. Guy Lescoffier observed a luminous trail followed by a powerful headlight-like beam with sparks, disappearing with a 'silent' explosion.
• December 1978, Vittel: Witness M. Thibault observed a sun-colored luminous object at medium altitude, followed by a descending and spiraling trail that persisted until 18h30. A gendarmerie report was filed.
• December 1978, Bugnéville: Witness M. Baguet saw two half-circles of light, similar to electric lamps, and a multicolored trail. This was followed by a bright white flash and a luminous persistence for an hour.
• December 1978, Epinal (near the airport): The pilot of an Avions OOSDJ B-737 aircraft observed what appeared to be a rocket that exploded, followed by a parachute and a luminous trail.
• December 10, 1978, Ancerville-Gue: A witness observed a clearly defined, luminous orange ball stationary on the horizon. It then moved horizontally and slowly towards the woods, pulsating or vibrating. The witness followed it for 40 seconds.
• December 12, 1978, near Contrexéville-Auzainvilliers: Two witnesses observed an intense, ill-defined luminous phenomenon for 3 to 4 minutes. One witness described it as having a 'spongy' aspect with 'spots,' while his wife found it 'blurry.' Using 16x50 binoculars, it resembled a 'golf ball.'

Special Case: Nancy Sighting (October 6, 1978)

This section details a specific sighting in Nancy on October 6, 1978, at 20:45. A single witness reported seeing a slow-moving object, shaped like a rugby ball and orange in color, flying just above the rooftops of schools and a pharmacy. The object moved from southwest to northeast, lasted for 5 seconds, and was estimated to be about a hundred meters away and less than 30 meters high. Its size was comparable to a medium-sized car. The witness, identified as 'Mme X,' is described as a credible individual who could distinguish between conventional aircraft and this phenomenon. No radar detection or air traffic was reported at the time. The conclusion is that the phenomenon exhibited characteristics of a UFO: orange luminosity, silent movement, and a non-conventional shape. The report notes the common occurrence of single witnesses in such cases, even over populated areas.

Vitry-les-Nogent Sighting (September/October 1974)

This detailed report concerns a sighting by M. M., a 59-year-old man, in Vitry-les-Nogent (Haute-Marne) around midnight in September or October 1974. While at his first-floor window, M. M. observed two powerful, yellowish headlights approaching rapidly but silently. He then saw an object, described as resembling an army 'chenillette' or a speedboat, flying about 1 meter above the ground horizontally and in complete silence. He estimated its length at 2.50m and width at 2m, with a rounded rear and a pointed front. The object was surrounded by a 'mist' underneath and at the rear. Two oval headlights were situated at the front, with a gap between them. Behind the headlights were two opaque, domed structures. The object disappeared quickly. M. M. later reloaded his shotgun, intending to fire if it reappeared. The phenomenon repeated around 2 AM, with the same object (or a similar one) passing closer to his house, moving along a dirt path. It then ascended obliquely towards the sky and disappeared in the direction of Langres. Notably, M. M. experienced no physical effects, and his hunting dog showed no reaction. No traces were found on the ground or vegetation. The witness observed that the object did not seem to displace any air, as the surrounding vegetation remained still, suggesting it was not a conventional aircraft.

UFO Effects and Physical Traces

The article "LORSQU'UN OVNI PASSE PAR LA" (When a UFO Passes By) discusses the effects of UFO encounters, particularly "Type II" encounters involving landings or close approaches. These effects are categorized into electromagnetic, witness-related, animal-related, and ground-related.

Electromagnetic Effects:

• Vehicles: Engine stoppage and headlight extinction.
• Aircraft: Interference with electrical and radio equipment.

Witness Effects:

• Physical: Sensation of oppression and heat, tingling in the legs (potentially leading to temporary paralysis), nausea, headaches, and drowsiness for several days.
• Psychological: Indescribable fear, shock, and possible memory loss.

Animal Effects:

• Intense fear and agitation, with animals seeking to flee.

Ground Effects (Physical Traces):

These are considered the most valuable evidence, potentially more reliable than photos or testimonies.

• Crop Circles: Circular areas of flattened vegetation, typically 5 to 15 meters in diameter, with vegetation oriented in a specific direction.
• Disturbed Earth: Earth that is moved or dried.
• Vegetation Damage: Burnt or uprooted vegetation, sterile soil, calcined rocks that become friable and brittle, and crystallization of materials.

The article mentions examples from Australia (Queensland, 1966), Aumetz (Moselle), Quarouble (1954), and Marliens (1967). It notes that samples from these traces can provide indications if analyzed by serious groups, with chemists having offered their services.

Presentation of Ufological Groups

The magazine introduces several ufological organizations involved in research and information dissemination:

• La Commission Luxembourgeoise d'Etudes Ufologiques (CLEU): Based in Luxembourg, CLEU publishes a quarterly bulletin called "Chroniques de la CLEU." Its activities include creating a regional catalog, researching archives, documenting cases, organizing sky observation vigils, and maintaining a detection network. Membership options include active (400 FB) and corresponding (250 FB) members.

• Le Groupe 52/55: Established in October 1977, this group covers the Haute Marne and Meuse departments in France, acting as the regional delegation for "Lumières dans la Nuit." Their primary activities are investigations, observation nights, archive research, and building a database of observations. They also plan to publish a bulletin. Membership costs 50 FF annually, with options for active, investigator, correspondent, or benefactor status. Contact information is provided for their headquarters in Chaumont and for a representative in Ancerville-Güe.

• Le Cercle Vosgien "Lumières dans la Nuit" (C.V.LDLN): This association aims to bring together individuals interested in unidentified aerial phenomena (UFOs), focusing on cases in the Vosges department. Their activities include collecting UFO observations, conducting investigations, studying phenomena, and informing the public through various media. Membership fees are 50 F for active members, 25 F for students, and a minimum of 20 F for sympathizers.

• Le Groupe Privé Ufologique Nancéien (GPUN): Based in Nancy, GPUN is a group of volunteers who conduct ufological activities and investigations in the Nancy region. They publish a quarterly bulletin for their members and collaborate with numerous French and international groups. GPUN is also a member of the European Committee for Ufological Coordination (CECRU). They are seeking assistance and provide contact details for inquiries.

Addresses for all these groups are provided for those seeking further information or wishing to join.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the detailed reporting of numerous UFO sightings across France in late 1978, the classification and description of UFO characteristics (shape, color, behavior, effects), and the documentation of physical traces left by these phenomena. The magazine adopts a serious, investigative stance, presenting witness testimonies and findings from ufological groups. There is a clear emphasis on the scientific aspects of UFO investigation, including the potential for physical evidence to corroborate witness accounts. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into the UFO phenomenon, encouraging research and information sharing among various organizations and the public.