Chroniques de la CLEU - No 18 - Septembre 1981

Magazine Overview

Title: Les Chroniques de la C.L.E.U.
Issue: No. 18
Date: September 1981
Publisher: C.L.E.U. (Commission Luxembourgeoise d'Etudes Ufologiques)
Country: Luxembourg
Language: French

This issue of "Les Chroniques de la C.L.E.U." focuses on a specific UFO sighting and delves into the ethical considerations and methodologies within the field of ufology.

Article: Près de Dahlem au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

This section details an investigation conducted by Chantal ROOB and André PICHON of C.L.E.U. into a sighting that occurred near Dahlem. The report describes an encounter by a mother and her 18-year-old daughter on the national road 13 between Windhof and Dahlem. Approximately 500 meters before the village of Garnich, they observed a luminous object moving rapidly and regularly from South to North, passing to their left. The sighting took place on a night that was overcast and lightly drizzling. The witnesses provided slightly different dates for the event (January 4th, 13th, or 20th, 1981), but were firm on the time: precisely 8:00 PM.

Mme X, the driver, was alerted by her daughter to the luminous form. She slowed down, and her daughter opened the window, reporting no particular noise, as the car's engine was running. The object was observed for about a minute before disappearing into the darkness, possibly due to terrain or cloud cover. The observation was made with the naked eye, and the witnesses reported no physical sensations or effects on the car's operation.

The object was described as having an oval shape, outlined by small, fixed luminous sources of orange, yellow, and green. The interior was reportedly dark, and the object appeared to have a metallic aspect topped with a dome, as depicted in accompanying drawings by Mile X and Mme X. The size was estimated to be comparable to a large airplane.

The C.L.E.U. had no other reports of similar sightings at the time of publication. Despite minor discrepancies between the mother's and daughter's accounts, the report concludes that an unusual observation did occur.

Meteorological data for the Luxembourg airport around the time of the sighting indicated varying conditions: on January 4th, it was partly cloudy with light snow and a wind of 24 km/h; on January 13th, it was clear with a wind of 7 km/h; and on January 20th, it was very cloudy with a wind of 20 km/h.

In response to an inquiry, air traffic control stated that it was not possible to determine if an aircraft had flown over the country at a specified time and direction, providing a map of air traffic corridors.

Article: Le code de déontologie

This section presents a Code of Ethics developed by a working group in August and October 1980 and voted on unanimously at the 8th session of the CECRU in Lyon. This code is intended to be incorporated into the foundational texts of the French Ufology Federation. The preamble highlights that ethical rules are often disregarded in the study of UFOs, and that pressure has been exerted on witnesses and ufologists to limit or prevent the dissemination of information. The code aims to adapt fundamental human principles to the ufological context, drawing from over thirty years of UFO observation experience and the goals of independent European ufology, particularly within the CECRU.

L'Ufologie face au témoin (Ufology Facing the Witness)

The CECRU demands respect for the witness's rights, guaranteeing their tranquility, security, and anonymity upon request. It opposes any pressure on witnesses, regardless of its origin, and denounces the commercial exploitation of sensational cases. The CECRU emphasizes that witnesses should not feel like accused individuals or mere experimental subjects, and their desires and reticences must be respected. Investigators should foster an atmosphere of understanding, allowing witnesses to express themselves freely before any intervention. Interpretations should not be made a priori, but witnesses have the right to know the conclusions of the investigation.

L'ufologie dans son association (Ufology Within Associations)

The CECRU's goal is not to interfere in the internal affairs of associations but to highlight material or moral scams and abuses of power that discredit ufological study. It condemns such practices and offers support to associations fighting against them. While not claiming a right to oversee internal association life, the CECRU stresses the importance of basic principles for associative life. It condemns authoritarianism within associations, such as making decisions without members' knowledge or against their agreement. Respect for individual personalities and desires is crucial, provided they do not harm the association's functioning or relationships. The CECRU deplores passive attitudes where members treat associations and their volunteers as mere service providers, hindering independent ufology and facilitating scams or fraudulent commerce. It is essential to oppose individuals seeking personal profit through commercial sales or promotion within associations. The CECRU also stresses the need to oppose material or moral scams affecting members, including embezzlement and deception about the association's assets or the truth about objects to be acquired. Moral scams include the manipulation of individuals and the use of misleading titles or documents. The distribution of "official investigator cards" without serious control is deemed fraudulent.

Relations entre ufologues (Relations Between Ufologists)

One of the CECRU's fundamental goals is to improve relations among independent ufologists. While members and associations are free to express disagreement or denounce questionable practices, the CECRU calls for firm condemnation of activities that discredit their research. It condemns the use of ideas, techniques, or work protocols without the inventor's agreement. The CECRU refuses to endorse abusive generalizations that lead to excessive reactions among colleagues. The organization also notes that relations with external groups (public, press, state, research, commerce) have developed over time. The CECRU aims to prevent deception in these exchanges. It suggests that commercial products for ufological study should be examined by a specialized commission. The CECRU condemns sensationalism and the spread of false information or improbable hypotheses presented as facts, which can hinder serious investigation and the discovery of truth. While acknowledging the role of media in disseminating information, it warns against sensationalism that destroys objective reporting. The CECRU emphasizes that research should be conducted in liaison with scientific circles, using rigorous methodology, and that constant collaboration between scientists and ufological associations is beneficial. The CECRU acknowledges that states may have an ambiguous attitude towards UFO study and encourages objective research, but opposes state-controlled bodies that aim to impede or falsify ufological study. The results of ufological research should benefit all of humanity.

Article: Magny (57) le 30 mars 1981

This section includes a comic strip depicting an event in Magny on March 30, 1981. The strip shows people observing a large, colored ball in the sky. One person exclaims, "OH! LOOK AT THE BIG BALL..." Another urges, "QUICK, LET'S GO GET PEOPLE TO SEE IT!". The final panel shows the object flying into the clouds, with a caption stating, "IT STOPS AND CHANGES COLOR!" and "IT FLIES INTO THE CLOUDS...". The comic includes a map of the area and a diagram of a football field with witness markers.

Article: A propos du cas de Cergy-Pontoise

This article critically examines a work concerning the "Contact OVNI Cergy-Pontoise" case. The author argues that the work is a novel rather than a factual account and lacks scientific methodology or serious investigation. The article questions the concept of "advanced science" in ufology, particularly when it relies on hypnosis, highlighting the lack of guarantees and the need for rigorous conditions, practitioner competence, and peer review. It criticizes the reliance on hypnosis to authenticate cases and expresses doubt about information gathered through such methods, especially when only one person has employed the technique without cross-verification.

The author also critiques the work's references to "contactees," particularly "star contactees" who write books, give lectures, and form movements, suggesting they exploit the credulous. The article dismisses their "revelations" as baseless and technically or astronomically flawed. It advises readers interested in the topic to consult specific bulletins from AESV and CECRU that discuss "cobayes" (guinea pigs) and "light bearers."

The article contrasts these public figures with anonymous witnesses whose cases are not discussed. It implies that the work being reviewed may have been influenced by a desire to "set the record straight" regarding "advanced scientists" versus "classic scientists."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, the ethical conduct of ufological research, the importance of witness testimony, and the challenges of applying scientific methodology to the study of UFOs. The C.L.E.U., through its affiliation with CECRU and CNEGU, strongly advocates for ethical practices, respect for witnesses, and rigorous investigation. The publication appears critical of sensationalism, unsubstantiated claims, and the commercial exploitation of UFO phenomena, while also emphasizing the need for collaboration with scientific communities and objective research.

This issue of "Contact OVNI" is a critical examination of ufology and UFO reports, primarily focusing on cases and discussions within France. The publication adopts a skeptical stance, scrutinizing sensationalized media coverage, alleged eyewitness accounts, and the methodologies employed by various ufological groups. It appears to be a critique of the field, highlighting what it perceives as flaws, commercialization, and a lack of rigorous scientific investigation.

Key Articles and Discussions

Madame Fontaine and the IMSA

The issue begins by mentioning a "monumental blunder" related to Madame Fontaine, who apparently thanked IMSA members for their help. The author notes her positive reaction to unexpected visits resulting from her address being "negligently" shared.

Advertising and Book Recommendations

A "flashy" advertisement is noted at the bottom of pages, leading to a section on "Lying Advertisements" by Jean Bastide. Mr. Guieu's book recommendations are also discussed, specifically "The Bermuda Triangle" by Charles Berlitz and "Time and Space" by Maurice Chatelain. The review of Berlitz's book is dismissive, referencing a critical opinion from "La Recherche" magazine. Chatelain's work is described as an "initiation to relativity" that ultimately leads to "the last secrets of NASA," but the review suggests it veers into sensationalism rather than solid science fiction.

Critiques of Ufological Practices

The publication strongly criticizes what it calls "UFO-commercials," "dream merchants," and "exploiters" within ufology. It argues that the field is plagued by excessive credulity, the spread of rumors, and a lack of critical thinking. The authors propose that ufology would be better served by fewer "excessively credulous" individuals and more people who challenge misleading narratives. They differentiate true ufology from "show business" and commerce, emphasizing that a proper investigation requires more than just collecting witness accounts or press clippings.

Case Studies and Skeptical Analysis

Several specific cases are analyzed with a critical eye:

• Cergy-Pontoise: This case is repeatedly referenced, with the publication suggesting that the hype surrounding it was unwarranted and that many claims were exaggerated or fabricated. The issue questions the narrative of a possible contact, implying that official accounts and media coverage were misleading.
• Cantaduva (Brazil): Jean Bastide is quoted criticizing the mishandling of this case, stating it was "massacred" in the book compared to its correct reporting in France, calling it "unthinkable."
• The "Tunnel" Incident (Bourg-de-Sirod): The issue scrutinizes Jean-Pierre's account of finding a tunnel with German inscriptions, including "Qua Gen." The author argues that "Qua Gen" is a French phrase for "Headquarters" (Hauptquartier) and not a German inscription, suggesting a misinterpretation or fabrication. Further investigation by the publication revealed the tunnel was part of an old electric tramway and was used by the resistance during the occupation, contradicting the UFO narrative.
• Rolland Varrin's Testimony: This testimony about a sound heard in the direction of Cergy is questioned, particularly the date (December 3rd, 1979) which is noted as being after Franck's disappearance (November 26th). The author also notes Varrin's lack of connection to the main figures in the Franck Fontaine case.
• The "Men in Black" (MIB) Phenomenon: The issue discusses Jean-Pierre's alleged encounter with three MIB, describing their appearance. It links this to Carlos Castaneda's concepts of "intratemrestrials" and "forces of evil," suggesting a potential assimilation of fictional elements into ufological narratives.
• Teleportation (Manosque-Marseille): This case is mentioned, with the publication noting its similarity to other alleged "teleportation" stories. It suggests that the narrative might be an "invariance" found in similar accounts.

Critique of "Contact OVNI, Cergy-Pontoise" Book

The publication extensively critiques a book titled "Contact OVNI, Cergy-Pontoise." It points out numerous alleged inaccuracies, misinterpretations, and sensationalized elements within the book. For example, it questions the book's description of a tunnel and the interpretation of certain inscriptions. The authors also criticize the book's reliance on press clippings and its tendency to draw conclusions without thorough, independent investigation. The speed at which the book was produced (signed and dated February 17, 1980, shortly after the alleged events) is also questioned.

The Role of "Advanced Scientists" and "Occult Governments"

The issue mocks the idea of "advanced scientists" who claim to "know" without needing to verify or consult ephemerides. It also discusses the theory of "occult governments" that allegedly suppress information about UFOs and extraterrestrials, even threatening those who know too much. This is presented as a common trope within ufology that the publication finds questionable.

The CNEGU Conference (Chaumont, May 1981)

The latter part of the issue reports on the 9th session of the CNEGU (Comité Nord-Est des Groupements Ufologiques) held in Chaumont. Key points from the conference include:

• Revigny-sur-Ornain Case: A presentation by Roger Thomé of Groupe 5255 questioned the validity of this well-known case due to lacunae and obscure points found in a counter-investigation.
• Ball-Sonde Confusions: The CVLDLN presented cases of confusion with weather balloons, leading to a discussion on radar detection procedures.
• 1980 Observation Catalogue: Groups agreed to send their 1980 observation catalogues to Gilles Munsch for compilation and analysis, aiming to improve the reliability of such catalogues by eliminating vague or unverified information.
• New Equipment: Groupe 5255 presented an angular measurement device for field investigations.
• Robert Fischer's Detector: Robert Fischer of GPUN is working on a detector but facing sensitivity issues.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards sensationalized UFO reports, a critique of the commercial and unscientific aspects of ufology, and a demand for rigorous, evidence-based investigation. The editorial stance is clearly critical of many established UFO narratives and the way they are presented by the media and some ufological groups. The publication positions itself as a voice of reason and critical inquiry within the often speculative field of ufology, emphasizing the importance of verifying sources and avoiding unsubstantiated claims. The authors seem to believe that many UFO phenomena can be explained by conventional means, misinterpretations, or even deliberate fabrication, and they are critical of those who promote extraordinary claims without sufficient proof.

This issue of OVNI magazine, dated December 1981, focuses on various aspects of ufology, including investigations, meetings, ethical considerations, and witness accounts. The publication appears to be from the CLEU (Centre Luxembourgeois d'Etudes Ufologiques) based in Luxembourg.

Meetings and Discussions

The magazine details several meetings and their outcomes:

CNEGU Meetings

• 10th CNEGU Meeting (Nancy, September 1981): Organized by GPUN. The agenda included the presentation of the CECRU's adopted investigation report, which is available to all groups. A proposal was made and accepted to dedicate the 10th session's theme to ufologists who are themselves witnesses to phenomena, acknowledging this as a sensitive and often taboo subject. The meeting also covered the informatization of the GBIPHOM (an ufological directory), the French Ufology Federation (FFU), and the preparation for the next CNEGU session.
• Future CNEGU Sessions: The 10th session in Nancy was planned to include presentations from groups 5255 and GPUN on their own observations, alongside regular investigations. Future sessions are intended to be broader, including open debates on ufology problems.
• CECRU Meeting (Dijon, October 1981): Organized by ADRUP. This meeting also focused on the code of ethics for ufology, which the CNEGU is interested in incorporating into the FFU's texts.

Other Meetings and Events

• GEPAN Activities: GEPAN is establishing a technical note on the use of networks and a technical sheet on network functioning with photo examples. They are also refining their procedures for handling photo evidence.
• CLEU Activities: The group 5255 organized an observation camp in late July and shared information. The GAU plans to participate in a CNEGU session as an observer before deciding on full membership.
• Calendar of Events: The magazine lists upcoming meetings for the CNEGU, CECRU, and other social gatherings throughout late 1981.

Case Studies and Investigations

Several specific cases and investigative methodologies are discussed:

• Cergy-Pontoise Affair: An investigation by Michel Piccin and GAU concluded that this case was a hoax.
• Magny Observation (March 30, 1981): GPUN presented an investigation into an interesting observation case.
• Lepanges-sur-Vologne Object (September 15, 1978): CVLDLN presented a case involving a classic object evolving into a dead leaf.
• Longwy-Bas Observation (March 9, 1980): A detailed account from an 18-year-old student describes seeing two powerful, horizontal, white-yellow lights that widened and illuminated the surroundings. The witness initially thought they were projectors but realized they were part of a large, frightening mass. The object was described as a parallelepiped with lights at the front, flying at low altitude. The witness's mother described it as an "enormous tank in the sky." The father saw nothing, and the mother refused to discuss it further.
• CNES Report on Abduction: A report from the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES) analyzed the Cergy-Pontoise abduction case (November 26, 1979). The report concluded that the numerous errors, lies, and contradictions indicated a desire to distort or fabricate information, suggesting the case was an affabulation (hoax).

Methodological Discussions

• Investigation Methodology: There is a call to focus more on the witness themselves, ensure the accuracy of information and sources, and make investigations more precise and detailed, including meteorological data for confusion cases.
• Collaboration: The importance of collaboration and information exchange between groups is emphasized.
• Photos: For CECRU, photos showing "UFOs" appearing after development, which were not observed with the naked eye, should not be considered.

Miscellaneous Topics

• Citizen Band (CB) Radio: CB is highlighted as a communication tool for observation nights, with plans to establish a relay network in the North-East region. An experiment was conducted in the Vosges and Meurthe-et-Moselle.
• Telephone Alert Network: It is desired that all CNEGU groups be instantly notified of important observations via a telephone alert network.
• Technical Notes: A list of technical notes, both published and to be published, is being updated.
• Goodyear "Europa" Airship: The airship was scheduled to make a stop in Luxembourg in late September/early October 1981.

Bibliography

The issue includes a bibliography of ufology-related books, featuring works by Jean-Claude Bourret, Gérard Klein, Isaac Asimov, Charles Garreau, Maria Duval, and Alain Saury.

Membership Information

Details are provided on how to join the CLEU association as an active, corresponding, or sympathizing member, along with their postal address in Luxembourg.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently emphasizes the importance of rigorous investigation, accurate reporting, and ethical conduct within ufology. There is a clear effort to distinguish between credible sightings and hoaxes or misidentifications, as seen in the analysis of the Cergy-Pontoise case and the guidelines for photo evidence. The discussions around meetings and codes of conduct suggest a move towards professionalizing the field and fostering better inter-group cooperation. The editorial stance appears to be one of serious inquiry into unexplained aerial phenomena, while remaining critical of unsubstantiated claims.