CENAP Report - No 301

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP - REPORT
Issue: Nr. 301
Date: September 2006
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German
Document Type: Magazine Issue

Content Summary

This issue of CENAP REPORT, a German non-commercial UFO journal, features a prominent essay titled "Ufologie der Neuzeit - Religion - UFOs - PSI" (Ufology of Modern Times - Religion - UFOs - PSI). The cover art depicts a flying saucer over a landscape, visually linking the themes.

Editorial and Organizational Information

The publication is described as one of Germany's oldest non-commercial UFO journals, operating as a private publication. The impressum identifies Werner Walter as the publisher and editor, located in Mannheim. CENAP, the organization behind the report, was founded in 1976 as the "Centrale Erforschungsnetz Außergewöhnlicher Himmelsphänomene" (Central Research Network for Extraordinary Sky Phenomena). It is a private, non-commercial, and ideologically independent organization dedicated to receiving, analyzing, and evaluating reports of alleged unidentified flying objects (UFOs). CENAP maintains a critical stance and is associated with the GWUP (Society for the Scientific Investigation of the Paranormal) and the Society for Anomalistics. CENAP collaborates with national and international institutions, maintains a UFO video archive, and engages in public education and demystification efforts through media and academic channels.

Essay: Ufology of Modern Times - Religion - UFOs - PSI

The central essay delves into the complex relationship between ufology, religion, and PSI phenomena. It posits that UFOs have become a contemporary, almost mythical phenomenon, capable of provoking debate and offering a seemingly inexplicable puzzle. The author suggests that the fascination with UFOs might stem from a human need to imbue events with meaning, drawing parallels to psychological interpretations of myths and archetypes, referencing figures like James Hillman and Carl Gustav Jung.

Jung's observation that flying saucers represented a "sage" (legend) in the 1950s is discussed, with the author contemplating whether we are witnessing the end of this saga. The essay draws allegorical comparisons between the UFO phenomenon and Homer's Odyssey, highlighting themes of epic journeys, trials, and the search for home. The author notes that the elusive nature of the UFO phenomenon contributes to its ongoing fascination.

The essay critiques the tendency within ufology to create elaborate explanations and belief systems, sometimes without sufficient evidence. It questions whether UFOs are extraterrestrial or mythological in origin, suggesting they have secured a place in modern mythology akin to ancient legends. A quote from Karl Veit asserts the reality of flying saucers, dismissing them as mere illusions.

Further critique is directed at the uncritical acceptance of UFO reports within the field. The author points to Adolf Schneider's work and the MUFON-CES cataloging of UFO cases, suggesting that these were often based on popular UFO literature rather than rigorously investigated incidents. This approach, the essay argues, led to a naive understanding of the phenomenon, particularly in earlier decades.

The text explores the human need for belief and the search for truth, suggesting that UFOlogy, like religion, can provide a framework for understanding the world and filling perceived gaps in knowledge. However, it warns against mistaking belief for evidence and highlights the potential for 'esoteric' interpretations to overshadow scientific inquiry.

The essay contrasts the scientific approach, which relies on verifiable facts and critical investigation, with the speculative nature of much ufological discourse. It suggests that the allure of the unknown and the 'mysterious' aspects of UFOs appeal to a desire for something beyond conventional scientific explanation. The author notes that many UFO proponents are critical of science precisely because science is critical of their beliefs.

The text also touches upon the role of 'contactees' and the influence of figures like Billy Meier, questioning the basis of their claims. It posits that the UFO phenomenon reflects human fantasies and fears, acting as a mirror to our inner world. The author expresses a personal view that the UFO mystery is essentially a reflection of our own dreams and anxieties, calling this essay his "ufo-researcher's testament."

The essay criticizes the commercialization of ufology, where 'dream power' and 'fairy tales' are exploited for profit, creating a "business potential" based on audience fascination. It argues that we live in an "assertion society" rather than a "proof society," where claims are accepted without rigorous verification, especially within ufology.

Referencing Francis Bacon's quote, "What a man would like to be true, that he more readily believes," the author suggests that people invent explanations to fill perceived gaps, creating narratives that align with contemporary beliefs. The essay questions the methodology of UFO research, particularly the reliance on anecdotal accounts and the tendency to generalize from individual reports to a universal "UFO" concept.

It is argued that the true complexity of UFO phenomena is multi-causal, and that the idea of a single, unified "UFO" is a simplification. The essay criticizes the uncritical acceptance of UFO literature, comparing it to a "glittering Fata Morgana" in a desert of lost humanity. The author believes that only ufologists themselves could resolve the confusion surrounding flying saucers, but they lack the interest due to their own ingrained beliefs and desire for the mysterious.

The text highlights historical UFO research groups from the 1950s and 60s in the USA, such as UFORC, CORAB, and the Teenagers UFO Research Society, noting that many of these organizations existed primarily on paper and their research efforts were superficial, often limited to collecting newspaper clippings and holding meetings.

The essay concludes by suggesting that the fascination with UFOs is deeply intertwined with human psychology, mythology, and a fundamental religious need for meaning. It posits that "Vision," fantasy, and lies are difficult to distinguish in this context, and that the modern UFO phenomenon is a complex blend of these elements, deeply connected to the human psyche.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the intersection of ufology, religion, and PSI phenomena. The editorial stance is clearly critical and skeptical, emphasizing the need for rigorous scientific investigation and cautioning against uncritical acceptance of anecdotal evidence and speculative theories. The publication aims to demystify UFOs and promote a more rational understanding of alleged phenomena, distinguishing between genuine research and myth-making.

This issue of CR (likely a publication focused on critical analysis or research) from September 2006, issue 301, delves deeply into the field of ufology, presenting a highly skeptical and critical perspective. The articles argue that UFO belief systems often function as a form of religion, providing meaning and structure to individuals' lives, driven by speculation rather than empirical evidence.

The Nature of UFO Belief

The magazine posits that UFO belief is akin to a modern religion of the space age, offering a sense of purpose. It suggests that the core of this belief is internal, a personal conviction rather than something displayed externally. The authors contend that most ufologists are more interested in speculation than in practical investigation, relying on fantastical stories from speculative literature to build their theories about extraterrestrial visitors.

Critiquing UFO 'Evidence'

A significant portion of the content is dedicated to dissecting the 'evidence' presented by ufologists, particularly photographs and videos. The articles highlight numerous cases where alleged UFO sightings can be explained as misidentifications of mundane objects such as mini hot air balloons, the planet Venus, or even simple atmospheric phenomena. The issue emphasizes that for a UFO expert, the primary role should be that of an IFO (Identified Flying Object) expert, capable of distinguishing between genuine mysteries and explainable phenomena. It criticizes the tendency within ufology to perpetuate myths by failing to adequately investigate and debunk these IFOs.

Photographic 'Evidence'

Photographic evidence is a major focus of criticism. The magazine argues that many famous UFO photos, when examined closely, are indistinguishable from known hoaxes, camera tricks, or misinterpretations. Examples cited include images that are blurry, show objects that are clearly mundane (like hubcaps or models), or suffer from lens flares and reflections. The authors express frustration that even when clear explanations exist, they are often ignored or dismissed by UFO proponents. The issue points out the irony that while UFO photos are abundant, actual sightings of 'real' UFOs are rare, with the phenomenon being largely confined to photographic 'evidence' and speculative narratives.

The Role of Michael Hesemann

Michael Hesemann, a prominent UFOlogist, is frequently mentioned and critiqued. His work, particularly his book "UFOs - Visitors from Space," is presented as an example of how ufology can be misleading. The magazine argues that Hesemann often presents controversial or debunked images as credible evidence, selectively omitting information that contradicts his claims (e.g., the Falkville 'Alien' case, which was revealed to be a hoax involving a firefighter's suit). Hesemann's approach is characterized as promoting a 'psychological warfare' to convince the public of extraterrestrial presence.

The 'Dark Age' of Ufology

Tony Rullan, a UFOlogist since the 1970s, is quoted as stating that his decades of involvement have yielded no learning about 'real' UFOs, and that the field is characterized by "uncertainties" and a lack of solid evidence. He observes that when UFO cases are systematically investigated, they tend to dissolve into mundane explanations. Rullan suggests that ufology has entered a "dark age," where naive promoters engage in "mental masturbation" to keep the myth alive, often for commercial gain. The data base is described as poor, with theories and anecdotal evidence prioritized over rigorous case studies.

Ufology as a 'Religion'

The magazine repeatedly draws parallels between UFO belief and religion. It describes UFOlogists as 'pilgrims' in a 'godless land,' seeking answers and meaning. The 'evangelium' of ufology is presented as the 'good news' of alien visitors. The authors argue that this religious aspect makes critical engagement difficult, as skeptics are often demonized and dismissed as 'UFO-opponents.' The adherence to certain 'ufological' rules, such as discrediting critics, is seen as characteristic of a religious cult.

The Problem of 'Believers'

The issue highlights the psychological aspect of UFO belief, suggesting that many people prefer to believe in fantastical explanations rather than confront mundane realities. This preference is seen as a barrier to objective research. The magazine criticizes the tendency to accept claims without rigorous questioning, especially when they align with pre-existing beliefs. The authors express concern that this mindset prevents the field from progressing and leads to the perpetuation of myths.

Conclusion and Editorial Stance

The overarching stance of this issue is one of strong skepticism towards ufology as a field of serious inquiry. It argues that the phenomenon, as presented by many ufologists, exists primarily in the minds of believers, fueled by speculation, misinformation, and a desire for the extraordinary. The magazine advocates for a more critical and evidence-based approach, distinguishing between genuine unexplained phenomena and the often-fabricated or misinterpreted 'evidence' that dominates much of the UFO literature. The authors believe that the field needs a fundamental shift in its methodology and mindset to move beyond its current state of 'mental masturbation' and speculative narratives.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

Recurring themes include the critique of photographic 'evidence,' the comparison of ufology to religion, the psychological motivations behind belief, and the commercialization of UFO narratives. The editorial stance is unequivocally skeptical, advocating for rigorous scientific investigation and critical thinking to debunk misidentifications and hoaxes within the UFO field. The magazine aims to expose what it sees as the flawed methodologies and unsubstantiated claims prevalent in much of ufological discourse.

This issue of CR magazine, dated September 2006, delves into a critical examination of ufology, questioning the prevailing narratives and the evidence presented for extraterrestrial visitations. The publication adopts a skeptical stance, highlighting instances of hoaxes, misinterpretations, and the psychological underpinnings of belief in UFOs.

The Erosion of the 'Ufological Middle Ground'

The article begins by referencing James Moseley's assertion from a 1985 edition of 'Saucer Smear' that most UFO reports, upon objective scrutiny, fall apart or reveal significant weaknesses. The author echoes this sentiment, stating that after 20 years, they are no further along in understanding the phenomenon. The piece notes that decades have passed since Arnold's sighting, yet many ufologists maintain a 'hurrah, we've won!' mentality, clinging to the idea of alien spacecraft and visitors, often resorting to less conventional aspects of UFO mythology, such as 'sex-in-a-saucer' abduction cases, while conventional sightings, the core of UFOlogy, are increasingly ignored.

Ray Palmer and the 'Flying Saucers' Dilemma

The text then recalls the November 1961 issue of 'Flying Saucers' magazine, where editor Ray Palmer expressed his frustration at the lack of concrete evidence for alien visitors despite thousands of witness reports. Palmer admitted he could no longer sign off on UFOs being spacecraft from outer space or secret weapons of earthly powers, a stark contrast to his earlier career as a science fiction writer. To address this, Palmer introduced a new column, 'From the Critic's Corner,' managed by Peter Kor, a UFOlogy critic and saucer skeptic. Kor's initial contribution labeled UFO clubs as the 'cult of the twentieth century,' where 'childishness' manifested and a belief system had 'crystallized,' citing APRO and NICAP as examples of organizations that, while ostensibly investigating the phenomenon, had internally accepted the notion of 'interplanetary visitors' without adhering to scientific methodology.

The 'Generelle UFO' and the Nature of Belief

The article posits that the 'generelle UFO' phenomenon seems to retreat into a thematic greenhouse out of boredom, generating new forms, tactics, and motivations. These are then standardized and ritualized by the collective consciousness, leading to a pendulum swing towards the belief that nothing is as it seems and that the true meanings lie beneath the surface. This is characterized as 'old wine in new skins,' offering a construct in moonlight.

UFOlogy as 'Magic'

The author suggests that the term 'ufological MAGIC' is crucial for understanding the enthusiasm surrounding UFOs. Drawing on literary scholars, an allegory is described as having parallels between two levels of being, one assumed and the other embodied in the literal narrative. The symbolic, which is more important than the UFO itself, is hidden beneath the surface. The superficial story of an allegory is subordinate to its deeper meaning, even if it appears to be of greater importance at first glance.

The Dichotomy of UFO Controversy: Appearance vs. Reality

This perspective explains the incompatibility of certain facets of the UFO controversy, where the mundane and the fantastic merge. Observers may conclude that all claims are either true or unbelievable. The truth, however, lies in the middle, though its boundaries are unclear. The article states that the pursuit of a 'middle ground' in UFOlogy over 60 years has failed, despite attempts to present it otherwise. The author asserts that the debate is often polarized into 'pro' or 'contra,' with anything else being mere distraction. This perspective dismisses much of the ufological and narrative fanfare, even from those who promote the controversy for their own reasons.

The Human Imagination and 'Pictorial Events'

The article posits that the concept of 'appearance becoming reality' is a 'source' of human imagination, based on 'pictorial events' that are coherent enough to be noticed but too complex for the masses to fully grasp. Those who look beyond ideological fog can see this. However, there seems to be an invisible threshold in the social and cultural UFO phenomenon that a topic must cross to become significant enough to endure and integrate into the UFO myth, making people 'completely hysterical.' Conversely, many things that appear under the UFO banner do not gain traction, even if they are as grotesque as those that do. The 'public/media world' acts as a 'God,' determining what is attractive enough to be reported and published, thereby solidifying the public image. This process involves significant chance and 'agenda setting.'

The Case of MUFON and the Ed Walters Hoax

The text recounts how James Moseley, a MUFON member in June 1990, was explicitly forbidden by the newly appointed MUFON State Director for Florida, Charles Flannigan, from investigating the Ed Walters case. Moseley, suspecting Walters of creating trick images through double exposure, spoke with Tommy Smith, Hank Boland, and Ed's son Danny, who he believed were key figures in confirming the hoax. Moseley was subsequently expelled from MUFON for disloyalty. The article criticizes MUFON and other ufological 'competence teams' for failing in their research and for losing their innocence.

Roswell and the 'Alien Autopsy Film'

The article mentions the Roswell incident and the 'Alien Autopsy Film' as an example of how a 'non-event' can have drastic consequences and lead to financial gain. It notes that Ted Bloecher had already documented the story as a case of 'Hoaxes and Mistakes' in his 1967 work, 'Report on the UFO Wave of 1947.' The author laments that the American UFO scene failed to learn from the past, even though Bloecher himself was an 'alien believer.' The 'great wisdom' was missed in 'Saucerdom,' with encounters being framed at the edge of reality to function.

The Misinterpretation of UFO Reports

The article argues that claims that an objective analysis of UFO reports automatically leads to the conclusion of extraterrestrial visitation are flawed. Instead, the author believes the opposite is true. The persistent distortion of this fact across ufology, unnoticed by most, is frustrating. The text critiques the framing of UFO reports, citing a summary statement that significant numbers of sightings cannot be explained by known physical or psychological schemas, and that many come from credible witnesses, thus not attributable to hallucinations. It also notes that many UFO reports originate from scientifically trained individuals, such as natural scientists and engineers, including a considerable number of police officers.

The Nature of UFOlogy and its Critics

The magazine asserts that the idea that UFOs exist solely in the imagination of religious fanatics or poorly trained individuals is untenable. It states that neither 'leading scientists' have provided definitive UFO evidence, nor are mass sightings due to hallucinations or mental disorders. Instead, they are attributed to unrecognized, mundane IFOs (Identified Flying Objects). The article criticizes the notion that only religious fanatics see UFOs, suggesting that even highly trained witnesses like police officers (who are not trained in UFO identification) are not immune. The author expresses a desire for 'brainpower' to elevate ufology from its current state to proper UFO research.

The 'Shaver Mystery' and Commercialization

The article discusses how figures like 'Big Mack' and John Mack emerged, offering 'fool's gold' that captivated ufological enthusiasts. It criticizes the lack of critical questioning, with many instead bolstering the believers. A warning against trusting 'abductologists' is highlighted. The author points out that in ufology, 'saucer logic' often elevates legends like MJ-12 above facts, succumbing to 'will-to-believe' in 'unsolved mysteries,' even if they are virtual realities. This is seen as a form of fanaticism among 'gaga saucer friends.'

The 'Roswell' Case and its Aftermath

Footnote (1) details the release of the 'Alien Autopsy Film' a year after Paul Davids' documentary on Roswell, which became widely known. This event, along with the theme of 'secret knowledge of the US government about extraterrestrial UFO visitors,' which had been a subtle but important theme in popular UFO folklore, provided a focal point. The footnote explains that the delay in involving real experts allowed the story to develop its own life as a myth. When experts eventually debunked it with earthly truths, ufological adherents refused to accept it. This is presented as a mechanism where new topics are sensationalized, leading to 'rehashes' by other authors. The process is rapid, and true UFO researchers are often in a reactive position, as investigations take time.

The 'Shaver Mystery' and its Commercial Success

Footnote (2.1.) discusses how the 'Shaver Mystery,' popularized by Ray Palmer in 'Amazing Stories' in the mid-1940s, became a bestseller, increasing the magazine's circulation significantly. Palmer understood how to sell stories by studying older mysteries like 'Airships,' which were revealed to be fabrications by press agents to boost circulation. The article suggests that 'mystery storytellers' are natural favorites for the UFO community. Those who debunk these stories are seen as enemies of the fandom, as believers feel they are in 'enemy territory.'

The 'UFO Phenomenon' as a Reflection of Human Desire

The author suggests that the UFO phenomenon might represent a form of revelation of true identity, allegorically. The question is posed: could the behavior of 'UFOs,' which aligns with our preconceived notions of the hidden, be their unique way of revealing themselves? The article notes that UFO enthusiasts rejoice at positive survey results about extraterrestrial life because it aligns with their belief in a 'ufological sincerity.' They equate the UFO question directly with the possibility of extraterrestrial life. The author, however, separates the UFO phenomenon from the question of extraterrestrial life, stating that sightings of unidentified flying objects in our atmosphere are one thing, while the question of life elsewhere is another.

The Commercialization of UFOlogy

Footnote (2) details how the USAF ultimately classified 701 UFO cases as 'unsolved.' When the Center for UFO Studies was founded, it re-examined these cases and reclassified about 10 percent as explainable. The article criticizes the notion of 'cover-up' as overused, suggesting that the USAF erred in over 50 'genuine UFOs,' failing to recognize IFOs. It highlights that even UFO researchers who conducted random checks of the Blaubuch (Blue Book) cases had to agree with the explanations, urging believers to reflect on this.

The 'Marian Apparition' Phenomenon

Footnote (3) provides an example from February 2003, following the Columbia space shuttle disaster, where a piece of cloth on a fence post near Sydney, Australia, was interpreted as a 'Marian apparition.' Despite being explained as a condensation phenomenon on a windowpane, thousands of pilgrims flocked to the site. The article critiques this as an example of how the human brain seeks patterns and meaning, sometimes creating 'religious shrines' out of mundane objects. It calls this the 'OZ factor,' a powerful, all-encompassing force that overshadows reality.

The 'Dreckiges Fenster' Case

Footnote (3.1.) describes a similar 'Marian apparition' reported in a hospital window in Milton, Massachusetts, in June 2003. Despite being identified as a condensation phenomenon, the site attracted thousands of pilgrims. The hospital administrator called it an 'appearance in a dirty window, without any miracle.' The article laments that the rumor spread, turning the location into a 'religious shrine,' with people seeking miracles and healing.

The 'Three Monkeys' Behavior and UFOlogy

The article suggests that the 'three monkeys' behavior (see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil) is a prerequisite for the right UFO conviction, forming the basis of the saucer epic. It draws a parallel to Othello, who eventually finds himself. The entire field of ufology is described as a tragic figure in the classical sense, with its messengers of science being part of a skeptical UFO phenomenon investigation.

The Commercial Aspect of UFOlogy and Gray Barker

Footnote (2) criticizes ufological 'commercialists' who, like Gray Barker in the past, understood how to keep the topic interesting by providing fantasies, fun, and games. Barker, a publisher of UFO magazines, admitted that his secret to success was to 'let people believe, let them wonder, entertain them, give them fantasies, fun, and games. And in difficult times, keep the topic interesting for the readers.' The article states that most successful ufologists follow this approach without admitting it, feeding human imagination and promoting superstition for success. This is described as a 'shocking truth.'

Howard Menger and the 'East Coast Adamski'

Gray Barker published Howard Menger's book 'From Outer Space to You' in 1959, despite not believing Menger's story himself. The book received harsh reviews but was popular among a faction of ufology. Barker even sold licenses for the book to Germany. Moseley recognized that the 'saucer-minded' public needed such stories. The article notes that similar materials, like music CDs or videos, are now included with books, referencing Barker's 'MIB: The Secret Terror Among Us,' which featured a chapter on 'Dr. Richard H. Pratt,' who was allegedly silenced by Men in Black. 'Dr. Pratt' is revealed to be journalist John C. Sherwood, who admitted to creating a fictional source for Barker's story.

Timothy Green Beckley and the 'Mr. UFO' Persona

The article mentions Timothy Green Beckley, who emerged in the 1970s and became known as 'Mr. UFO.' He is described as a UFOlogist and businessman who has explored various aspects of the field, often incorporating New Age themes and catering to public demand, stating, 'I just give people what they want.'

The 'Shaver Mystery' and its Commercial Exploitation

Ray Palmer's success with the 'Shaver Mystery' is highlighted again, emphasizing how he understood the market for sensational stories. The article suggests that those who debunk such stories are natural enemies of the fandom, as believers feel threatened. The author posits that the UFO phenomenon might be a way to reveal true identity, and that the behavior of UFOs aligns with our hidden desires, potentially representing a form of revelation. The author distinguishes between UFO sightings and the question of extraterrestrial life.

The Commercialization of UFOlogy and the 'UFO-Mystery'

The article criticizes the tendency in ufology to dismiss all natural explanations for UFO sightings, as this would strip the subject of its mystery. It reiterates that the USAF classified many cases as 'unsolved,' and that even after re-examination, a significant number remained unexplained, leading to accusations of cover-up. The author suggests that the term 'cover-up' is overused and that the USAF may have simply misidentified IFOs. The article concludes by urging UFO believers to reflect on these findings.

The 'UFO-Mystery' as a Puzzle

The article compares UFO reports to an 'Enigma deciphering machine,' where raw messages are transformed into unintelligible groups of letters. The task of UFO researchers is to decode these messages into clear text. The success of this decoding depends on the recipient's knowledge and experience. The author uses a quote from a British intelligence chief about the Enigma problem: 'Oh, holy s...!' implying that some can crack the code while others cannot.

Parapsychology and UFOlogy: Shared Psychological Roots

Footnote (1) draws a parallel between parapsychology and ufology, noting that both fields deal with phenomena that are difficult to prove definitively. Walter von Lucadou is quoted stating that many parapsychologists have spent their lives trying to understand hauntings without conclusive proof. The article suggests that the 'haunting phenomenon' is primarily a psychological issue, often stemming from interpersonal problems, particularly within families. This forms the basis for 'hauntings' or other paranormal events.

The Commercialization of UFOlogy and Gray Barker's Business Model

Footnote (2) reiterates the criticism of ufological commercialists, using Gray Barker as an example. Barker, a publisher of UFO magazines, understood the need to keep the topic interesting by providing fantasies and entertainment. His business model was to 'let people believe, let them wonder, entertain them, give them fantasies, fun, and games.' The article states that this approach, while successful commercially, feeds into superstition and hinders rational inquiry.

Conclusion: The Need for Critical Inquiry

The issue concludes by emphasizing the need for critical thinking and a move away from blind belief in ufology. It suggests that the field has become overly commercialized and myth-driven, often at the expense of genuine scientific investigation. The author calls for a more grounded approach, one that acknowledges the psychological and social factors that contribute to UFO beliefs, rather than uncritically accepting extraordinary claims.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards the extraterrestrial hypothesis in UFOlogy, the analysis of hoaxes and misinterpretations, the psychological drivers of belief, and the commercialization of the UFO phenomenon. The editorial stance is clearly critical and analytical, aiming to debunk sensational claims and encourage a more rational and evidence-based approach to the study of unidentified flying objects.

This issue of CR (presumably a magazine focused on critical or skeptical analysis) from September 2006, issue number 301, delves into the complex world of ufology, examining the beliefs, methodologies, and psychological aspects surrounding UFO sightings and the concept of extraterrestrial visitors. The articles critically analyze the UFO phenomenon, contrasting the perspectives of enthusiasts with those of skeptics and researchers.

The Divide Between UFO Fans and Skeptics

The opening sections highlight the fundamental disconnect between UFO enthusiasts and skeptics. The author notes that UFO fans often react with confusion or distress when confronted with rational explanations, while skeptics and fans are presented as fundamentally opposed. Despite decades of efforts, a common ground for discussion remains elusive. The article suggests that the true nature of aerial phenomena is often obscured by ufology itself, driven by commercial interests that may not seek genuine enlightenment. It posits that the UFO community can fall into 'self-deception' fueled by 'ufological belief energy,' particularly among those who struggle to distinguish between reality and fantasy.

The Allure of the UFO Phenomenon

Despite the complexities, the author admits to a persistent curiosity about ufology, likening it to an addiction or a 'malaria' that one cannot shake. This fascination is attributed to a deep-seated curiosity and the inspiration that 'flying saucers' and alien narratives can provide, offering hope and a sense of wonder. However, this can also lead to a fear that reality might shatter these cherished fantasies. The article touches upon the psychological needs that may drive individuals to seek validation for their experiences within closed groups, sometimes leading to the embellishment of stories.

Critical Analysis of UFO Claims and Research

The issue emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and a scientific approach, urging researchers to listen to firsthand accounts but to maintain a critical stance. It criticizes the aversion to experienced critics and skeptics, which can lead to overlooking crucial data and making flawed judgments. The author argues that scientific progress relies on the input of knowledgeable individuals, yet the paranormal field often prefers to remain insular. While acknowledging that UFOs are not necessarily 'figments of imagination,' the author insists on the need for concrete, irrefutable evidence before accepting extraordinary claims.

The Condon Report and its Reception

A significant portion of the content is dedicated to the Condon Report, a comprehensive study of UFOs. The article defends the report against common criticisms, suggesting that many critics have not actually read it and are instead relying on dogmatic assumptions. It highlights that the Condon Report identified many cases as unidentified but also found no evidence of advanced extraterrestrial technology. The author contends that the report's conclusion—that further investigation would not yield new scientific insights—remains valid and relevant, despite being a point of contention for UFO enthusiasts who believe the scientific exploration of UFOs was deliberately blocked.

The Nature of UFO Evidence

The article questions the quality of information circulating within ufology, distinguishing between 'information' and 'hard data.' It suggests that much of what is presented is secondhand and unverified. The author points out that the UFO phenomenon often becomes a subject of 'ufological fundamentalism,' influenced by speculative literature. This can lead to an overemphasis on subjective experiences, such as alleged telepathic abilities, and a disregard for rational explanations. The article contrasts this with a healthy dose of common sense, logic, and rationality, suggesting that the 'ufological dark side' should be acknowledged, especially if traditional religions no longer fulfill the spiritual needs of many.

The Role of Skeptics and Critics

The text discusses the challenges faced by UFO researchers and critics, who are often dismissed by the UFO community. It highlights the difficulty in distinguishing between genuine witnesses and those who may be embellishing or fabricating stories. The author notes that while some UFOlogists are well-informed, many rely on hearsay and speculation, sometimes even outright fantasy. The article also touches upon the tendency to prematurely judge the reliability of witnesses based on their social status rather than their perceptual accuracy, ignoring the well-documented phenomenon of eyewitness misperceptions.

The 'Inner Space' vs. 'Outer Space' Debate

One of the recurring themes is the debate between those who believe UFOs are extraterrestrial craft ('outer space') and those who view them as products of the human psyche or terrestrial phenomena ('inner space'). The article uses the example of Betty Hill's presentation, where her alleged alien encounters were revealed to be misinterpretations of mundane objects like airplane lights and a Christmas tree. This event is presented as evidence that the 'flying saucers' and aliens are not from outer space but from 'inner space,' a manifestation of the human mind.

Conspiracy Theories and Belief Systems

The issue explores the psychological appeal of conspiracy theories, linking them to a desire for simple explanations in a complex world. It suggests that conspiracy theories can serve as a coping mechanism for individuals overwhelmed by reality, offering a sense of order and understanding. The article draws a parallel between the Jesus conspiracy and modern UFO-related conspiracy theories, suggesting that both stem from a need to find meaning and explanations for events, often by attributing them to hidden agendas or powerful forces.

The 'Corporate Identity' of Ufology

The article critiques the 'corporate identity' of ufology, suggesting that its proponents are often resistant to external criticism and are more interested in reinforcing their existing beliefs than in pursuing objective truth. It argues that this self-preservation mechanism prevents the field from progressing and leads to a dogmatic adherence to certain narratives. The author implies that the UFO phenomenon is real, but its interpretation is heavily influenced by a visionary impulse and psychodynamic effects, leading to the materialization of 'flying saucers' as symbols of alien visitation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The overarching theme of this issue is a critical examination of ufology, challenging its foundational assumptions and methodologies. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, advocating for rigorous scientific inquiry, evidence-based reasoning, and a clear distinction between verifiable facts and speculative beliefs. The articles consistently emphasize the psychological factors that contribute to belief in UFOs, including the influence of media, the desire for extraordinary explanations, and the tendency towards conspiracy thinking. The issue aims to demystify the UFO phenomenon by applying critical analysis and highlighting the limitations and biases within the ufological community, while still acknowledging the reality of unexplained aerial phenomena (IFOs) and the importance of continued, albeit rational, investigation.

This issue of 'CR' (likely a publication focused on critical analysis or research) from September 2006, issue 301, delves deeply into the subject of ufology, presenting a highly critical and skeptical perspective. The cover headline, 'UFOlogie der Neuzeit - pur er- und durchlebt' (Modern Ufology - Purely Experienced and Lived Through), with the subtitle 'Essay zum OCR 301 vom Stachel im ufologischen Fleisch' (Essay on CR 301 from the Thorn in the Ufological Flesh), immediately signals a challenging and contrarian viewpoint.

The Nature of UFO Belief and Skepticism

The articles explore the psychological and sociological underpinnings of UFO belief. Michael Swords reports on an interview with an old UFO enthusiast who, despite having encountered numerous cases, has become increasingly skeptical. This individual's belief in 'best cases' from the 1950s, lacking physical evidence, highlights a common issue in ufology: a reliance on anecdotal accounts and a tendency to focus on specific eras. The author posits that 'we construct our own reality,' suggesting that ufology, like 'ufoology' (a term implying a less rigorous approach), is susceptible to wishful thinking and unfulfilled desires that can distort perceptions and lead to elaborate 'interpretive constructs.'

Critiques of Ufological Methodology

A central theme is the critique of ufological methodology. The author argues that while astronomy involves a quest for knowledge and requires imagination, it must be grounded in learning and precision. Fantasizing without restraint risks sending science into a 'twilight zone.' The piece laments that many ufologists, esotericists, and occultists actively promote this uncritical approach. From a clinical psychology perspective, UFO reporters are often seen as normal individuals who have made an unusual observation, but the issue is how these observations are interpreted.

Peter Brookesmith is cited for his observation that UFOlogists' conclusions often bear little relation to the actual experiences of witnesses. This is exacerbated when similar experiences are not shared by others nearby. The article points out that many purported UFO 'evidence' cases are actually tricks, legends, or perceptual errors that enthusiasts fail to recognize, sometimes due to a self-imposed bias ('sunglasses').

Psychological and Sociological Factors

The issue delves into the psychological aspects of belief, suggesting that in the context of ufology and other fringe sciences, individuals with psychological difficulties may be drawn to these areas, seeking to make sense of internal experiences through 'crazy interpretations.' An example is given of a postal worker who attributed voices from the radio to a secret service, weaving a complex narrative of persecution. Notably, this individual's stories did not involve UFOs but rather secret services or religious delusions.

Worldviews, belief systems, and ideologies are seen as influencing UFO sighting experiences. For some witnesses, these sightings confirm existing beliefs, perpetuating them even after rational explanations are found. The article suggests a potential compulsion for witnesses to maintain their narratives to remain in the spotlight. It also touches upon the human tendency to exaggerate frightening events, turning mundane occurrences into monstrous ones.

UFOs as Modern Mythology

The comparison is drawn between UFOs and older myths and legends. The author questions whether UFOs are fundamentally different from historical 'monsters' that once populated legends. The 'para-literature' of ufology is described as a form of popular demythologization that reinterprets biblical accounts scientifically, appealing to a modern fascination with technology and imagination. However, this often leads to a 'saga' rather than objective understanding.

The article criticizes the 'pseudo-scientific' veneer of much UFO discourse, noting that despite decades of effort, the UFO phenomenon remains poorly understood. A key indicator of 'pseudo-science' is the lack of progress or learning over time. The author also references historical accounts of 'fire dragons' and early rockets, suggesting a continuity of fascination with aerial phenomena that can be misinterpreted.

The Problem of Evidence and Interpretation

Seriousness in UFO research is questioned, particularly concerning the interpretation of witness testimony. The article highlights that witnesses, even when truthful, may be mistaken due to subjective perception. The author criticizes 'obscure ufologists' who, in a state of heightened alarm, promote wild theories and distract from the core question of what UFOs are if they are not extraterrestrial craft but rather modern folklore.

Many contemporary UFO enthusiasts are described as approaching the topic from sociological and psychological angles, reinterpreting phenomena through a modern lens, often as evidence for extraterrestrial beings. However, this approach is deemed not strictly scientific because it relies on personal experiences that cannot be subjected to rigorous scientific experimentation.

The Role of IFOs (Identified Flying Objects)

A significant point is made about the lack of knowledge among UFO researchers regarding 'Identified Flying Objects' (IFOs). Many UFO sightings are attributed to misidentified mundane objects like clouds, mirages, auroras, ice crystals, or lightning. While planets and meteors are sometimes mentioned as misidentifications, other common IFOs like hot air balloons and sky trackers are often overlooked. The author emphasizes that a researcher's ability to correctly evaluate IFOs is a crucial measure of their credibility.

The 'UFO-Opponent' Perspective

The issue discusses the 'UFO-opponent' perspective, characterized by a rigorous approach that first seeks to determine if a sighting is consistent with reality, if a rational explanation exists, or if it is an IFO or a fabrication. This contrasts with the common practice in ufology, where the burden of proof is often shifted or ignored.

The 'UFOlogy' Scene and its Challenges

The article portrays the ufology scene as fraught with internal conflict and a lack of scientific progress. It is described as a 'danger zone' where many participants, consciously or unconsciously, engage in self-deception. The author suggests that the small community of UFO critics and skeptics is often marginalized, as their views can challenge the established beliefs of the majority. The intense debates within ufology are likened to religious conflicts, driven by strong emotions rather than objective analysis.

Conclusion and Future Outlook

The issue concludes by reiterating that 60 years of ufology have not moved the scientific needle, largely because there was nothing scientific to move. The author implies that the fascination with UFOs, while perhaps inherently interesting, has been overshadowed by the flawed 'ufology' surrounding it. The piece suggests that the focus should shift from the question of 'Are they out there?' to a more critical examination of the phenomena and the claims made about them.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards mainstream ufology, the psychological and sociological factors influencing belief in UFOs, the importance of critical thinking and scientific methodology, and the role of misinterpretation and folklore in shaping UFO narratives. The editorial stance is clearly that of a critical investigator, aiming to debunk unsubstantiated claims and promote a more rational and evidence-based approach to understanding anomalous aerial phenomena. The publication appears to champion a rigorous, almost confrontational, form of skepticism within the UFO discourse.

This issue of CR magazine, dated September 2006 (CR 301), delves into a critical examination of the ufology field, with a particular focus on skepticism, alleged hoaxes, and the personalities involved. The articles express a strong critical stance towards many aspects of ufology, questioning the credibility of prominent figures and cases.

The Role of Skeptics and 'The Others'

The magazine begins by discussing the position of skeptics within the UFO community, portraying them as 'the others' who are often viewed as 'traitors' or 'spoil-sports' by dedicated ufologists. The author, identified as 'WW', positions himself as a 'wasp sting' to the 'ufological water-head,' suggesting that skeptics are essential for maintaining the 'ufological theater' by providing a counterpoint.

Jesus Christ, Keyhoe, and Adamski: 'Light Beings'

The issue draws parallels between religious figures like Jesus Christ and modern UFOlogists like Keyhoe and Adamski, referring to them as 'light beings' or 'icons' who founded belief systems. The author notes that while Jesus left no written testimony, his teachings spread through his followers, similar to how the beliefs in 'flying saucers' and aliens are propagated without scientific proof. The impact of the 'teaching' is considered identical, regardless of the historical accuracy.

Gnosticism, Romes Influence, and UFOlogy

A historical parallel is drawn to the Gnostics and their non-biblical gospels, which were suppressed by Rome. This is compared to how certain UFOlogy promoters might handle information, selectively presenting narratives. The text suggests that the selection of scriptures for the New Testament occurred late, with evangelists not being direct witnesses to Jesus' life, but rather focused on spreading a doctrine. This is mirrored in ufology, where patterns of 'reconstruction' and personal intentions are seen in the narratives of figures like Keyhoe and Adamski, with Adamski himself being labeled a charlatan.

The Santilli Film and Hesemann's Defense

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the 'Alien Autopsy' film by Ray Santilli. Michael Hesemann is presented as a key figure who distributed this video in Germany and defended it. The film is compared to the 'Hitler Diaries' hoax of 1983, questioning its authenticity and the credibility of those who promote it. Hesemann's defense of the film is scrutinized, with the author suggesting he may have been deceived or complicit.

Hesemann is quoted admitting that Santilli is 'embarrassing' and a 'shady businessman,' and that he himself never offered an 'alien finger' for sale, though evidence to the contrary is claimed to exist from the Cröffelbach conference. Hesemann's stance is that skeptics are not interested in the truth.

Billy Meier and the Pleiadians

The case of Billy Meier, a contactee who claims to have received messages and rules from the Pleiadians, is also heavily scrutinized. Hesemann's defense of Meier is presented as an attempt to 'sugarcoat' the situation. The author criticizes Meier's alleged teachings, which include ideas about the 'eradication of 'unworthy life',' deeming them dangerous and detrimental to serious UFO research. Hesemann's interviews with Meier are described as part of a commercial film shoot rather than genuine field research.

Critiques of Hesemann and Ufological Practices

Michael Hesemann faces considerable criticism throughout the issue. He is accused of manipulating information, using his own assumptions as 'quasi-proof,' and producing books that are more like novels than factual accounts. His defense of controversial figures and cases is seen as self-serving and an attempt to maintain his own standing within ufology. The magazine suggests that Hesemann has a history of defending questionable claims, including those of Santilli and Andreas Schneider.

The Nature of UFOlogy

The magazine posits that ufology is a dangerous field, rife with confusion and deception. It is described as a 'biotope for confusion and confused individuals,' where seriousness and fun are intertwined with deceit. The authors argue that the field has become a 'danger zone,' even for science, and that the shift of some UFOlogists towards skepticism is a significant development.

Historical Context and CIA's Role

The issue touches upon historical events, including the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the USSR, attributing these to internal systemic contradictions rather than external pressures like Reagan's defense policies. The role of the CIA is discussed, noting its founding after WWII and its reliance on unverified information. The magazine also mentions the development of a spy-thriller video game, 'Spycraft,' by former intelligence chiefs, suggesting a blurring of lines between intelligence and entertainment.

Personal Involvement and Skeptical Inquiry

The author emphasizes their own 30-year involvement in the UFO problem through 'personal involvement of skeptical inquiry.' They highlight the human component of the issue, moving beyond the scientific non-provability of UFOs. The magazine concludes by reiterating that ufology is a dangerous area, characterized by confusion and potential deception, and that the transition of insiders to critics is a notable trend.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critique of ufology as a field prone to sensationalism and deception, the questioning of the credibility of prominent ufologists and their cases (particularly Michael Hesemann and Billy Meier), and the importance of skeptical inquiry. The editorial stance is clearly critical of mainstream ufology, advocating for a more rigorous and evidence-based approach while exposing what the authors perceive as hoaxes and self-serving narratives. The magazine positions itself as a voice for critical examination within the UFO community.

This issue of CR (presumably a magazine) from September 2006, issue number 301, delves deeply into the complex and often contentious world of UFOlogy. The publication appears to be critical of the prevailing narratives and practices within the UFO community, particularly focusing on the perceived disconnect between scientific inquiry and popular belief. The content is primarily in German, with a strong emphasis on analysis and critique.

Skepticism and Media Reactions

The article begins by addressing the author's role as a skeptic and the "outbursts" and "senseless reactions" from UFO enthusiasts that his stance has allegedly provoked. It cites an aggressive email received by the author, highlighting the animosity some in the UFO community feel towards critics. The author positions himself as someone who aims to bring the UFO phenomenon into the realm of "UFOs and the limits of science," suggesting a need for a more grounded, scientific approach.

The Problematic Background of UFO Phenomena

It is argued that after nearly 60 years, the underlying problems of the UFO phenomenon have not been truly understood or resolved, partly due to its entanglement with pop culture. The author's organization, CENAP, is presented as working to cover the broad scope of the UFO phenomenon by examining its individual components within the larger framework. However, this approach is said to cause problems for many UFO fans, who develop "false images" of CENAP. The article laments the lack of application or understanding of principles like "Ten UFO Research Principles" by researchers like Klass and Jenny Randles, suggesting a resistance to objective analysis.

UFOlogen-Psychologie (UFOlogist Psychology)

A significant portion of the text is dedicated to what the author terms "UFOlogen-Psychologie." This section explores the social and psychological dynamics of individuals involved in UFO research. It suggests that UFO enthusiasts often lead isolated lives, viewed as eccentric due to their hobby. This isolation can lead them to seek community within like-minded groups, where they can express their interests freely and find mutual support. The author draws a parallel to the "God versus Darwin" debate as a symbolic representation of this dynamic.

Critiques of Witness Credibility and UFOlogy

The article presents several numbered points (1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4) that seem to be excerpts or summaries of discussions, possibly from forums or other publications, which are then analyzed and critiqued by the author. These points often highlight perceived flaws in UFOlogy and the way witnesses are treated or perceived.

• (1.1) Discusses how UFO witnesses are often dismissed or seen as "dumb or confused," and how states should not treat their citizens this way. It also touches upon the perceived lack of options for witnesses, with groups like CENAP being known.
• (1.2) Critiques the credibility of some UFO witnesses, suggesting that a significant percentage are "alcoholics, drug addicts, mentally ill, village idiots." The author questions whether these individuals are deliberately chosen to undermine the phenomenon's credibility. He also notes that skeptics tend to suppress many reports, citing the UFO wave over Belgium as an example of potentially significant but overlooked events.
• (1.3) This section directly quotes a forum user's description of UFO witnesses as "hardened alcoholics, drug addicts, mentally ill, village idiots." The author refutes this, stating that no official or private UFO group has ever characterized witnesses this way and calls it "total nonsense" based on a lack of understanding of the subject.
• (1.4) This point seems to be a response to a statement that is not fully provided but is described as "totally bizarre" and unrelated to the given situation. It then discusses the common, often inaccurate, perceptions of UFO skeptic organizations, portraying them as a form of "compulsive behavior" driven by psychological problems, rather than a rational stance.

The Role of Michael Hesemann

A substantial part of the issue focuses on Michael Hesemann, a writer and historian known for his work on UFOs and Christian relics. The author portrays Hesemann as a controversial figure, questioning his motives and methods. Hesemann is accused of engaging in "psychological warfare" and using "verbal violence" to deter people from UFO skepticism. The article suggests Hesemann attempts to create a negative psychological climate around skepticism and potentially hide uncomfortable truths about the UFO phenomenon.

Hesemann's past is scrutinized, including an incident where he allegedly presented himself as an extraterrestrial in an esoteric channeling session. The author also discusses a fax received from Hesemann's company that attempted to "criminalize" the author, accusing him of slander and business damage. Hesemann's defense that the fax was unofficial and therefore inadmissible in court is presented as a tactic.

The article also touches upon Hesemann's involvement with "New Age" movements and his perceived attempts to link UFO phenomena with religious relics. The author contrasts Hesemann's views with those of the Vatican, which is depicted as being wary of New Age and esoteric beliefs, viewing them as a threat to Christian faith.

"Henri Schnyder" and the Hesemann Controversy

The issue details a discussion on Wikipedia regarding Michael Hesemann's entry. A user named "Henri Schnyder" (later revealed to be Hesemann himself using a pseudonym, with an AOL email address) attempted to present a positive biography of Hesemann. The author, Werner Walter (identified as the head of CENAP), points out that "Schnyder" used CENAP sources and immediately tried to discredit them. Walter reveals that "Schnyder" is Hesemann, who had previously written a foreword for a book by Andreas Schneider. The article then delves into a complex legal dispute involving Andreas Schneider, Erich von Däniken, and Rudolf Henke, suggesting a history of conflict and manipulation within the UFO community.

Walter claims that Hesemann, under the pseudonym "Henri Schnyder," sent him documents to discredit Schneider, framing it as a collaboration to "eliminate the swindlers." Walter feels he was used in this process.

The Nature of UFO Phenomena and Research

The author argues that the UFO problem is too "human" and that the focus should be on scientific inquiry rather than emotional responses. He criticizes the tendency within UFOlogy to embrace "esotericism and spiritualism," which he believes has historically burdened the field in Germany. He also points out that many UFO researchers are resistant to examining uncomfortable truths or admitting when a case is likely an IFO (Identified Flying Object) rather than a genuine UFO.

Intersubjective Verifiability and Scientific Standards

The article emphasizes the importance of "intersubjective verifiability" in scientific research, a concept derived from Immanuel Kant. This means that facts and conclusions must be observable, repeatable, and comprehensible to others, adhering to logical rules of argumentation. The author contrasts this with the UFO field, where observations are often one-sided and theories are not rigorously tested. He notes that while there are many UFO reports, the observations are not intersubjectively verifiable, and alternative psychological explanations for phenomena are often ignored.

Conclusion and Editorial Stance

The issue concludes by reiterating the author's critical stance on UFOlogy, viewing it as more suited for pop culture than hard science. He suggests that serious scientific work on the topic often comes from the humanities and social sciences, sometimes categorized as "parascientific" or "fringe science." The author believes that the UFO community often fails to distinguish between fact and fiction, leading to a lack of public credibility and a "giggle factor." The overall tone is one of frustration with the lack of scientific rigor and the prevalence of unsubstantiated claims and personal agendas within the UFO research community.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of CR consistently adopts a critical and skeptical stance towards UFOlogy. Recurring themes include the unreliability of witness testimony, the psychological motivations of UFO enthusiasts and researchers, the influence of media and pop culture on the UFO narrative, and the perceived lack of scientific rigor in UFO research. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of a scientific, evidence-based approach, contrasting sharply with what the author views as the pseudoscientific and often emotionally driven nature of much UFOlogy. There is a strong critique of individuals like Michael Hesemann, who are portrayed as manipulative figures within the field. The issue also highlights the tension between skepticism and belief, and the challenges of conducting objective research in a field often characterized by sensationalism and personal agendas.

This issue of CR (Cover Report) magazine, dated September 2006, delves into the complexities of UFOlogy, focusing on the critical examination of alleged UFO sightings, the role of media in shaping public perception, and the distinction between genuine research and hoaxes. The publication appears to be German, given the language of the articles.

The Australian UFO Wave of 2006

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to debunking the 'Australian UFO wave' of 2006, which was promoted online via australianufowave.com. The article reveals this to be an 'experimental film project' by Christopher Kenworthy, funded by the Australian Film Commission. Kenworthy's intention was to conduct a sociological experiment, using approximately 30 staged 'video recordings' to gauge public emotional and sensational reactions when presented as genuine UFO-Alien encounters. He viewed this endeavor as an 'art event' akin to crop circle creations, rather than a deception. The project aimed to explore how people would react to material presented within the context of 'personal experience drama of a close UFO encounter.' Kenworthy's background includes early interest in UFOs, trick photography, and even creating crop circles.

Kenworthy received 15,000 Australian dollars from the film funding for this project. He expressed satisfaction that the critical reactions were minimal and that the project, while faked, entertained and moved people, potentially stirring interest in UFOs. He criticized the continued presentation of obvious fakes, like the World Trade Center UFO clip, as evidence, and highlighted the issue of television commercials being mistaken for genuine UFO footage. Kenworthy believes that by exposing fakes, he can make people more cautious and help the field of UFOlogy gain seriousness.

Skepticism vs. UFOlogy

The magazine strongly advocates for a skeptical approach to UFO phenomena. It contrasts the mindset of a skeptic with that of a serious UFO researcher. While skeptics are portrayed as having a predetermined conclusion that UFOs must have an explanation, serious researchers are described as keeping all options open – considering hoaxes, misinterpretations, or genuine UFOs. The article criticizes the 'result-oriented' approach of skeptics who must find an explanation, contrasting it with the objectivity sought by serious researchers.

There's a critique of certain UFOlogists, referred to as 'H.', who are accused of manipulating narratives to fit their preconceived notions. The article highlights the work of UFOwatchdog.com and its founder, Royce J. Myers, who interviewed the project's responsible party. The piece suggests that some UFOlogists are more interested in promoting a mythos than in rigorous investigation, sometimes misrepresenting facts or relying on anecdotal evidence.

The Business of UFOlogy

The publication suggests that UFOlogy, particularly in its commercial aspects, can be a 'dangerous game.' It points out that many UFO reports are presented with 'rhetorical tricks' rather than journalistic diligence. The business model of UFO magazines is described as catering to a clientele that desires mystery, thus perpetuating legends and re-hashing old cases. The article implies that the 'trick' is to keep things mysterious to ensure circulation, even if the 'riddles' have long been solved.

Historical Context and German UFOlogy

The issue touches upon the history of UFOlogy, mentioning the 'Arnold Phenomenon' of 1947 in America. It also discusses the German UFO scene, particularly the 'Deutsche UFO/IFO-Studiengemeinschaft' (DUIST), which is characterized as being heavily influenced by esotericism and spiritualism. The founders of CENAP (Central Investigation Network of Extraordinary Aerial Phenomena), Werner Walter and Hansjürgen Köhler, sought to establish a more rational and scientific approach, distancing themselves from the 'ufokirchliche' and sect-like activities of DUIST. They aimed to create an 'UFO parliament' with diverse factions, moving away from the simple acronym 'U.F.O.' to encompass a broader range of aerial phenomena.

CENAP's approach is described as being critical and skeptical, not to deny the existence of UFOs, but to rigorously investigate the claims. They emphasize the importance of learning from mistakes and applying scientific methods to sift through evidence. The article notes that many UFO reports are easily identifiable as IFOs (Identified Flying Objects), with over 9 out of 10 falling into this category. The focus of UFO research, according to this perspective, is to determine the reality behind UFO sighting claims.

The Role of Media and Pop Culture

The influence of pop culture on UFO perception is highlighted, drawing parallels between UFO investigation and the forensic approach seen in TV shows like 'CSI' and 'Akte X.' The article suggests that the 'UFO-forensics' trend, driven by the desire to find explanations for UFO photos and videos, is influenced by media portrayals. The 'mystery-fan' dynamic, exemplified by 'Akte X,' is seen as shaping public expectations and understanding of UFOs.

America and UFOs

America is portrayed as a land of contradictions, where concepts like 'freedom' coexist with a large prison population, and where sensationalism in media is prevalent. The article notes the ironic timing of the 'Flying Saucer' hysteria erupting in 1947, coinciding with America's greatest expansion and its conquest of new frontiers. It suggests that if 'flying saucers' hadn't appeared, they might have had to be 'invented.'

Scientific Method and UFOlogy

The issue stresses the importance of scientific methodology in understanding UFO phenomena. It critiques the tendency within some UFO circles to rely on quasi-religious beliefs rather than empirical evidence. The article references Karl Popper's ideas on observation and theory, emphasizing that observations are shaped by prior knowledge and that scientific inquiry requires logical analysis and rigorous testing of ideas. The distinction is made between the creative process of idea generation and the logical verification of those ideas.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO claims, the debunking of hoaxes, the importance of skepticism in research, and the critique of sensationalism and commercialization within UFOlogy. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of a rational, evidence-based approach, distinguishing between genuine scientific inquiry and what is perceived as pseudoscientific speculation or outright deception. The magazine advocates for a more mature and critical engagement with the UFO phenomenon, urging readers to be discerning and to rely on verifiable facts rather than unsubstantiated claims.

This issue of CR (Consciousness Research) magazine, dated September 2006, focuses heavily on the ongoing debates and research within the UFOlogy community. The content is largely driven by excerpts from online forum discussions and internal reflections on the nature of UFO research, skepticism, and belief.

CENAP and Werner Walter's Approach

The magazine highlights the work of CENAP (Centrum für Nahumforschung) and its prominent figure, Werner Walter. Walter's perspective is presented as a self-taught, critical approach to UFO phenomena, aiming to move beyond what he terms 'ideology-driven' or 'esoteric' UFOlogy. He expresses frustration with the lack of critical thinking within the field and positions CENAP as a force for 'psycho-hygiene,' seeking to clarify the UFO situation and correct misconceptions. Walter describes his own journey from being a UFO enthusiast to a more critical researcher, acknowledging that his initial beliefs may have been based on 'fool's gold.' He contrasts this with the older 'DUIST' guard, suggesting that the younger generation, like the Mannheim youth in the 70s, sought to challenge established norms.

CENAP's methodology is described as a 'psycho-social' effort, aiming to bring a sense of responsibility and critical analysis to UFO research. Membership in CENAP is presented not as an application process but as a 'calling' or recruitment based on shared dissatisfaction with the status quo in UFOlogy. Many CENAP members are former UFO believers who, through their experiences, have become more critical and mature.

Online Forum Debates: Skepticism vs. Belief

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to showcasing reactions from online UFO forums to a CENAP newsflash. These discussions reveal a stark divide between proponents and skeptics.

Key themes emerging from the forum excerpts include:

• Critique of UFOlogy: Skeptics like Werner Walter and others argue that much of what is presented as UFO evidence is fabricated, misinterpreted, or exaggerated. They criticize the tendency to equate 'flying saucers' with extraterrestrial spacecraft and dismiss many 'alien encounter' stories as fantasy.
• The 'Flying Saucer' Trope: The iconic image of the 'flying saucer' is discussed as a powerful visual lure that has dominated UFOlogy since its inception, often leading to a conflation of the phenomenon with this specific shape.
• Personal Experience vs. Evidence: A central conflict is between those who rely on personal experiences, anecdotal evidence, and intuition, and those who demand rigorous, verifiable proof. Skeptics often dismiss personal accounts as subjective or products of psychological phenomena.
• The Role of Skeptics: Skeptics like Walter are often portrayed as being attacked or dismissed by UFO enthusiasts, accused of being closed-minded or part of a conspiracy to suppress the truth. However, the magazine also suggests that even skeptics can have 'UFO encounters,' albeit interpreted differently.
• The 'Belgian Wave' and Other Cases: Specific UFO incidents, such as the Belgian UFO wave and the Colares incidents in Brazil, are frequently brought up. The Belgian cases are debated, with some suggesting ultralight aircraft as an explanation, while others defend the extraterrestrial hypothesis. The Colares incidents are presented by some as evidence of extraterrestrial aggression.
• Forum Dynamics: The discussions highlight the often-heated nature of online debates, with moderators frequently intervening to curb personal attacks and enforce rules of conduct. The magazine notes that some 'pro-UFO' forums are resistant to critical viewpoints, leading to a 'garbage factor' and attracting 'fanatics.'
• Research Methodology: The debate extends to research methods, with some advocating for on-site field investigations and interviews, while others argue that much can be accomplished through internet research, phone calls, and existing documentation.

Specific Incidents and Interpretations

• Belgian UFO Wave: This is a recurring topic, with Werner Walter's interpretation of the events being challenged. Some users accuse him of dismissing the reports by labeling them as 'ultralight aircraft' (ULFs), while others defend his analysis, suggesting that the reports themselves mention various stimuli, not just ULFs.
• Colares, Brazil Incidents (1977): These events are described as involving 'extraterrestrial discs' attacking people, with some claiming people died as a result. The military investigated these cases. The interpretation of these events varies widely, from genuine alien aggression to misidentification or fabrication.
• The 'Disclosure Project': Dr. Steven Greer's project is mentioned as another example of UFO-related claims, characterized by 'epochal witness testimonies.'

Critiques of the 'Pro-UFO' Stance

The magazine includes commentary suggesting that many UFO enthusiasts are unwilling to accept information that contradicts their existing beliefs, preferring to maintain their own 'picture' of the UFO phenomenon. This is described as a psychological background that prevents them from understanding the core problem of equating UFO sightings with extraterrestrial spacecraft.

The Nature of Belief and Reality

One section touches upon the idea that governments and institutions, like many individuals, may suppress or ignore the UFO phenomenon. It suggests that a shift in collective consciousness and a broader understanding of extraterrestrial life could lead to greater openness from authorities.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The overarching theme is the critical examination of UFOlogy, emphasizing the need for rigorous research and a skeptical mindset. The magazine appears to align with Werner Walter and CENAP's stance, advocating for a more scientific and less esoteric approach to understanding UFO phenomena. The editorial stance is one of challenging conventional UFO beliefs, encouraging critical thinking, and exposing what it perceives as the 'fanaticism' and 'unscientific' elements within the UFO community. The magazine champions the idea that true understanding comes from careful analysis and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths, even if they are not what one wishes to believe.

This issue of CR (CR 301, September 2006) focuses on the contentious landscape of UFOlogy, particularly the intense debates and animosity between proponents and skeptics within online communities. The magazine critically examines the dynamics of these discussions, the methodologies employed, and the personal attacks that often characterize them.

The 'Corinna B.' Case and Forum Conflicts

A significant portion of the magazine details the case of a user named 'Corinna B.' (also referred to as Corinna) and her involvement in online UFO forums, primarily Alien.de and Paranews.net. Corinna B. was reportedly banned from these forums due to her confrontational and critical stance. The articles present her as someone who challenged the prevailing narratives and the perceived 'blindness' of some UFO enthusiasts. Her expulsion is framed as a result of her strong skepticism, which clashed with the forum moderators' and members' beliefs. The magazine also touches upon allegations that she was employed by Paranews.net for promotional purposes, which were later terminated due to her actions.

Skepticism vs. Belief: A Deep Dive

The issue extensively explores the role and nature of skepticism within UFOlogy. It features contributions that critique both the 'believer' and 'skeptic' camps. One perspective, attributed to Dennis Kirstein, highlights his long-standing involvement with UFO topics and his evolution from an enthusiast to a more critical observer. He criticizes the sensationalism and lack of evidence in much of UFOlogy, while also acknowledging the need for critical inquiry. The magazine contrasts this with what it perceives as the 'dogmatism' of some skeptics who dismiss all phenomena without proper investigation. The article by Werner Walter, a prominent figure in German UFO skepticism, is heavily scrutinized, with critics accusing him of personal attacks and a lack of objective research.

Critiques of UFOlogy and its Proponents

Several articles express frustration with the state of UFOlogy, characterizing it as driven by belief, fantasy, and a desire for confirmation rather than rigorous scientific investigation. The magazine criticizes the tendency of some UFO enthusiasts to accept unsubstantiated claims and to dismiss evidence that contradicts their beliefs. It also points out the 'us vs. them' mentality prevalent in many online discussions, where skeptics are often demonized as 'deniers' or 'propagandists.' The article questions the motivations of UFO researchers, suggesting that some are more interested in self-promotion or maintaining a particular narrative than in uncovering the truth.

The Cröffelbach UFO-Forum

The magazine discusses an upcoming UFO conference in Cröffelbach, Germany. This event is presented as an attempt to bring together various factions within the UFO community, including proponents and skeptics. However, there is skepticism about its effectiveness, with some suggesting it might devolve into further infighting or serve as a platform for self-aggrandizement rather than genuine research. The article notes that while some see it as an opportunity for dialogue, others view it with suspicion, particularly concerning the involvement of certain organizations.

Media and Cultural Context

Beyond the UFO debate, the magazine touches upon broader cultural trends. It critiques the sensationalism of media coverage and the tendency to focus on entertainment over substance, citing examples like the re-runs of 'Sex and the City' and the 'Masturbathon' event as indicators of societal decadence or a shift in values. The reclassification of Pluto as a dwarf planet is also mentioned as a scientific event occurring concurrently with these discussions.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the deep divisions within the UFO community, the challenges of conducting serious research in a field often dominated by belief and speculation, and the critical examination of both enthusiastic proponents and rigid skeptics. The editorial stance appears to be one of advocating for a more rational, evidence-based approach to the UFO phenomenon, while also criticizing what it perceives as the dogmatic or aggressive tendencies of certain individuals and groups on both sides of the debate. The magazine seems to position itself as a voice of reason amidst what it views as a 'culture war' within UFOlogy, emphasizing the importance of critical thinking and intellectual honesty.

Title: CR
Issue: 301
Date: September 2006

This issue of CR magazine, dated September 2006, delves into a variety of topics, drawing connections between technological advancements, pop culture phenomena, and the enduring mystery of UFOs. The issue commemorates significant anniversaries, including the 50th anniversary of the German Air Force and the 25th anniversary of the personal computer.

Thematic Connections: Superheroes and UFOs

The article begins by referencing the naming of the American spaceship generation, intended to succeed the Space Shuttle, as ORION. It then takes a trip down memory lane, recalling the August of 50 years prior when the German Air Force was established and, notably, the youth magazine BRAVO began featuring articles on UFOs, even introducing a figure known as 'Kontaktler' Andreas Schneider. Another significant event from the past mentioned is the launch of the personal computer 25 years ago, which profoundly changed human life. The article also touches upon the cultural impact of the movie Superman, noting that 20 years prior, the iconic phrase "Is it a bird? No! Is it a plane? No! It's Superman!" was prevalent.

In the summer of 2006, the 'steel-strong' Superman returned to the big screen, clad in his familiar blue suit, red cape, and S-logo. The article describes him as the most famous alien, Kal-El, returning to embody the ultimate illegal immigrant. It highlights Superman's unique status as a superhero, quoting Quentin Tarantino's associate, Bill, who stated, "Batman is actually Bruce Wayne. When Spiderman wakes up in the morning, he's Peter Parker and has to put on a costume to become Spiderman. Superman, however, didn't become Superman, he was born as Superman!"

The author reflects on their own childhood, youth, and early adulthood, finding a connection between Superman and the concept of 'flying saucers' with extraterrestrial pilots. They categorize both as "colorful dreams" and "beautiful fantasy worlds," which they have learned to appreciate and place within their context. This perspective leads the author to admire Roland Emmerich's films like 'ID4' and 'Godzilla,' humorously adding that "Supie comes flying along right after!" The author expresses a sense of wonder, stating that "the whole world hasn't seen this yet, so beautiful."

Contemporary Realities vs. Ufology

The article then shifts to the present, drawing a parallel between the return of the TV series "Miami Vice" and the current state of ufology. It notes that the "Miami Vice" revival is adapted to modern times, being "harder, darker, more reality-based - and more uncompromising and completely unglamorous." This reflects Hollywood's adaptation to contemporary sensibilities.

In contrast, the article contends that ufology is still floating in "colorful cotton candy worlds" (in the past). This is seen as a parallel to the returns of Superman and Batman, where the "cold professionalism" has taken over, and the "playful" aspect is a thing of the past. The author laments that the "good old days are gone," ushering in a new era without jokes and antics. Ufology, by remaining "entangled" in its past and not evolving to its advantage, is seen as "surviving itself."

The article concludes by stating that, much like in reality, the era of heroism and glory has ended since "9/11." This suggests a broader societal shift away from idealized narratives and towards a more sober, perhaps cynical, outlook.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the evolution of technology and media, the cultural impact of popular fiction (superheroes, films), and a critical examination of the field of ufology. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical observation, suggesting that while popular culture and technology have evolved to reflect a more realistic and perhaps darker present, ufology has failed to keep pace, becoming an anachronism. The post-9/11 era is presented as a turning point, marking the end of an era of perceived heroism and glory, and ushering in a more pragmatic and less fantastical worldview.