CENAP Report - No 298

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP - REPORT
Issue: Nr. 298
Date: February 2006
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of the CENAP REPORT, a long-standing German non-commercial UFO journal, marks CENAP's 30th anniversary and reflects on UFO phenomena observed in 2005. The publication aims to provide an exchange platform for those interested in UFOs and related topics, maintaining a critical and analytical approach.

Editorial and Introduction

The issue begins with a "Vorwort für den OCR 298" reflecting on the 30-year history of CENAP (1976-2006) and looking forward to 2006, while focusing on events from 2005. The editor, Werner Walter, discusses the low probability of contact with extraterrestrial intelligence but acknowledges the fascination it holds. He defines UFOs as "unidentified flying objects" and notes that while most can be identified, some remain mysterious. The concept of UFO contactees and the phenomenon of alien abductions, which has been prominent for about two decades, are introduced.

Walter touches upon "Gegenkonditionierung" (counter-conditioning) and the tendency for believers in paranormal phenomena to cling to their beliefs. He references a report from Focus-TV on Pro7 about an individual named "Patrick" who shared his abduction experiences online. This is followed by a critical response from a reader who identifies as an abductee, lamenting the lack of medical professionals in German-speaking countries who are knowledgeable about or willing to treat abduction phenomena. The reader challenges Walter, suggesting he lacks understanding and urging him to research the topic more thoroughly before making claims, citing the difficulty abductees face in seeking help due to fear of being labeled as mentally ill.

Abduction Experiences and Psychological Aspects

Further discussion explores the personal experience of an abductee who discovered a scar potentially linked to an abduction. The individual recounts a dream and subsequent nosebleeds, linking them to the scar. The reader questions how one would explain such an event to a doctor, fearing being dismissed as a "spinner" (crank) or mentally ill. The reader criticizes Walter for what they perceive as dismissive comments, stating that while they have contacted doctors, none in Germany specialize in abduction phenomena, fearing professional repercussions.

The issue highlights the difficulty for abductees to find support, comparing it to anonymous alcoholics groups but noting the lack of organized local meetings for abductees. The reader questions whether the problem is psychological and if abductees avoid help due to subconscious recognition and fear, turning instead to online "pseudo-friendships."

Werner Walter responds by advising individuals to seek psychological help if needed, emphasizing that CENAP is an exchange platform, not a medical one. He acknowledges that abductions might be traumatic and that people react differently to such experiences. He also addresses a participant's comment that Walter is against those who believe they have been abducted, clarifying that his issue is with the "way this scene functions" and the suppression of dissenting opinions.

Skepticism and Critical Analysis

A significant portion of the report is dedicated to a critical examination of the abduction phenomenon, drawing on psychological concepts. The article "Credo quia absurdum" (I believe because it is absurd) is presented, emphasizing that in anomalistics, where certainty is rare, things that sound plausible are not necessarily true. The author stresses that personal perception might not align with reality and that widespread errors can become accepted as "folk wisdom."

Dr. Christoph Bördlein's book "Das sockenfressende Monster in der Waschmaschine" is referenced, specifically a section on "Fallbeispiel: Entführt von Außerirdischen" (Case Study: Abducted by Aliens). Bördlein, a psychologist specializing in "cognitive deception," approaches the abduction question. The report discusses how abductees perceive their experiences as completely real, even if they are not. It explains phenomena like hallucinations, sleep paralysis, and hypnopompic hallucinations (waking hallucinations), suggesting that these can be misinterpreted as alien encounters. The article posits that the "grey aliens" described by abductees are a product of cultural evolution, similar to how demons were interpreted in the Middle Ages. The imagery of aliens is seen as influenced by popular culture, such as movies.

The report questions the reliability of memories, especially those produced under hypnosis, stating that memory is a reconstruction rather than a direct playback. It introduces the concept of "scripts" – mental frameworks that shape our expectations and memories of events, like visiting a restaurant. The article argues that hypnosis is a form of suggestion and does not enable recall of information that is truly forgotten. Distinguishing between real and false memories relies on external evidence, as their "feel" can be similar.

News and Reports

2005 - UFOs im Sommer:
This section reports on an eBay listing for a model hot air balloon described as a "Ballonfahrt mit dem Miniballon, Heißluftballon" (Balloon ride with a mini-balloon, hot air balloon). The item, offered by a hobbyist from Saxony, was presented dramatically as a way to experience a "dream balloon ride" and was marketed as a "Partyknüller" (party hit). The object itself was a semitransparent blue plastic bag with a burner flame. The report notes that this model was tested for suitability at a UFO conference in 2005 and found to be impractical.

MSN geht auf UFO-Pirsch (MSN goes on a UFO hunt):
This article discusses MSN's "Space Race" project, which invited users to submit photos of UFOs and aliens. The project was presented as being supported by the British Ministry of Defence (MoD), which had recently released previously classified UFO documents. However, the report critically analyzes this claim, stating that the British government's release of documents does not directly support MSN's private project. It highlights that Nick Pope, presented as an "official employee of the British Ministry of Defence" and a photo jury member, had previously worked at the MoD's UFO desk but no longer holds an official position related to UFO research. The article suggests that the project might be a way to gather photographic material, including fakes, for future analysis. Pope is quoted as saying the project aims to collect a wide range of photos, including fakes, to better identify them in the future. The report also notes that Pope clarified that the Microsoft campaign is not an official government initiative.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The CENAP REPORT consistently adopts a critical and analytical stance towards UFO phenomena. While acknowledging the public fascination with UFOs and alien abductions, the journal emphasizes the importance of scientific investigation, psychological understanding, and skepticism. It highlights the unreliability of eyewitness testimony and memory, particularly when influenced by cultural narratives and psychological states like hypnosis. The publication serves as a platform for discussion and information exchange, encouraging readers to question claims and seek evidence-based explanations. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious inquiry, distinguishing between genuine unexplained phenomena and misinterpretations, hoaxes, or psychological experiences.

This issue of CENAP-Report, dated February 2006, delves into several UFO-related topics and a significant media controversy surrounding a film release.

UFO Sightings and Investigations

The report begins by detailing the widespread UFO sightings that occurred on the morning of March 31, 1993, across England. Numerous people, including an RAF weather officer and police officers, witnessed objects streaking across the sky. The article notes that Nick Pope, who was active in UFO services at the time, highlighted this case in his first book, considering it unidentified. Pope's assessment stated that the unusual nature of the sightings, the high number of credible witnesses like police and soldiers, and the extensive investigations by his staff made the event remarkable. Despite thorough efforts, no explanation was found, leading to high-level inquiries in America regarding potential secret operations with stealth aircraft, though no answer was ever received.

However, the report suggests that the British UFO overflight of March 31, 1993, is not as mysterious as it might seem. The "Cosford Incident," named after the initial report filed by the military police at RAF Cosford, is presented as having a simple, natural explanation. This explanation, which Pope reportedly still refused to accept in March 2005, even though he was aware of it, is that the event was caused by the re-entry of the Cosmos 2238 satellite. This re-entry created a massive spectacle over England as it disintegrated, and it became known as the "Tskyklon-Reentry." Pope himself referred to this incident in Newcastle as "the second best UFO incident in Britain after Rendlesham."

The article then references a letter from Pope to Jenny Randles from late 1993, where he agreed that many of the March 31 sightings were likely caused by people witnessing the re-entry of Cosmos 2238. This is contrasted with his later tendency to grant the case mythical status, suggesting a possible "memory lapse." The report points out that Randles' 1998 book "UFO Crash Landing?" (page 217) contains a facsimile of Pope's letter. Furthermore, Doug Cooper of BUFORA also published a comprehensive investigation report on the case, reaching the same conclusion as Pope, which Pope had reportedly confirmed to Cooper by phone. The article implies that Pope may have overlooked these findings, including a significant article by David Clarke in 'Fortean Times' issue 199, to which Pope himself contributed as an author. This is framed as an example of the "wonder called perception" and "how I want to see the world."

In a separate note, on October 6, 2005, Pope announced that Microsoft's "Space Race Competition" had concluded, with over a dozen winning photos of UFO fakes available for viewing online.

UFOs and Commercial Ventures

The report touches upon the commercial nature of some UFO-related ventures, referencing a photo contest where participants genuinely believed it was an official attempt to gather information on ufologists or discredit ufology. The article dismisses this as a commercial endeavor, not an official one.

It is noted that much of the photographic material presented as evidence of fake UFOs is identical to countless photos of "real flying saucers or UFOs" found throughout UFO literature. The article suggests that some may have been disappointed by the results of the German "Doc Baumann Photoshop Contest" from 2004.

The 58th Anniversary of the "UFOs" and Skepticism

The article commemorates the 58th anniversary of the Kenneth Arnold sighting on June 24th. The author shares a background story on the CENAP-Newsticker, which sparked a discussion in the Alien.de-Forum. A new participant expressed skepticism, questioning the lack of evidence for the "UFOs = alien craft" theory after 58 years and lamenting that Roswell might still be the highlight for UFO proponents in another decade. The participant suggested that improved technology should have demystified UFOs and questioned whether the theory could still be defended with only a small percentage of unexplained sightings. The sentiment was that the theory's appeal lies mainly in its ability to spark imagination.

The author reflects on this sentiment, acknowledging the point and the feeling of powerlessness. The response received was that as long as money can be made from the UFO topic, the idea of "UFOs forget it" is unlikely to gain traction. The author agrees, stating that anyone deeply involved in ufology would likely share this view.

The author then shares a personal reflection on their own past engagement with ufology, having spent 15 years immersed in the literature. While initially enthusiastic, the belief in alien visitation fueled their imagination. However, with age, skepticism grew, leading to the realization that ufology often prioritizes fantasy over facts. The author expresses disappointment with the field, stating they would rather watch a good science fiction film, which openly admits to being fiction, than have fantasy presented as fact. The author plans to commemorate Kenneth Arnold's sighting with a drink and a smile, contemplating the impact of his report.

UFO Fleet Over Mexico (June 24, 2005)

The report details a significant UFO sighting that occurred on June 25, 2005, in Xalapa, Mexico. During an official ceremony at the Police HQ to hand over new police patrol cars, Governor Fidel Herrera Beltran and his staff witnessed a spectacle of approximately 14 small white objects hovering high in the sky. The event attracted the attention of journalists and the public, with many exclaiming "UFOs! UFOs!" The governor himself joked about Martians having arrived. While some speculated they were balloons, the objects remained visible for about 30 minutes, forming static triangular and circular formations. TV Azteca captured footage of the event, which was broadcast that same day.

Subsequent reports in the 'Diario de Xalapa' on June 27, 2005, attributed the objects to helium balloons released by children. However, ufologists like Santiago Yturria Garza criticized this "debunking," arguing that the presence of the governor, his staff, police, and media as witnesses made it an "official sighting" that could not be easily dismissed. They argued that the "intelligent-guided behavior" of the formations was inconsistent with balloons. The report suggests that ufologists often seek "elite witnesses" to lend credibility to their claims.

The article criticizes the tendency to attribute such sightings to UFOs, noting that similar balloon events have occurred in Mexico since the 1990s, fueled by figures like Jaime Maussan who promoted UFO hysteria and distributed amateur video cameras.

Media Criticism and "War of the Worlds"

The latter part of the report focuses on media criticism and controversy surrounding Steven Spielberg's film "War of the Worlds." The article highlights a "gag order" imposed by the film's distributor, UIP, on journalists who attended pre-release screenings. Journalists were required to sign an agreement not to publish reviews until the official release date (June 29th), with threats of exorbitant damages for violations. This move sparked outrage among journalists and media organizations, who viewed it as a violation of press freedom and a form of censorship.

Several media outlets, including 'Die Welt' and 'Der Spiegel', criticized UIP's actions. 'Welt am Sonntag' planned to publish an article about the phenomenon of imposing gag orders on journalists, framing it as a "big article about the phenomenon of silencing journalists." The article in 'Welt am Sonntag' reportedly criticized the film as "not very successful" and suggested that UIP's nervousness stemmed from fears of poor word-of-mouth publicity.

'Der Spiegel' also planned to publish a text criticizing the distributor's policy, though it would also describe the film. The head of the culture department stated that the film itself would be somewhat overshadowed by the controversy. The article notes that the film's critics were initially enthusiastic but were now hesitant to praise it due to the situation.

UIP required journalists to sign an agreement not to publish reviews before the start date, with those refusing being excluded from screenings. This policy was met with significant misunderstanding, not only among journalists but also from within UIP itself. The film's producers, Paramount Studios, reportedly made this a condition for the film's release.

Andreas Kramer, managing director of the cinema association HDF, found the secrecy surrounding the new Spielberg film "not clever" and stated he couldn't understand it. The Association of German Film Critics was discussing how to respond, with one journalist announcing "protests" from her organization. The concern was that if UIP, under pressure from Hollywood, could force journalists to sign such agreements, it would set a dangerous precedent for press freedom.

The article suggests that the distributor's actions, intended to control the narrative and perhaps create surprise, might backfire, turning the "screen war" into a battle for reporting freedom. It questions whether the aim was to limit the influence of criticism on the film's commercial success or simply to maximize audience surprise. The report implies that successful films have historically not shied away from critical judgment.

Spielberg's "War of the Worlds" and its Themes

The report further discusses the film "War of the Worlds," noting that Steven Spielberg adapted the story by H. G. Wells, which was first staged as a radio play by Orson Welles in 1938. Spielberg stated that he wanted to reflect the feeling of threat in the USA after 9/11. The film depicts an invasion by giant, three-legged metal machines. However, the article criticizes the film's special effects as artificial and the threat as not sufficiently overwhelming to create suspense. The tone is described as shifting from claustrophobia to monotony, with a lack of empathy for the victims, who are presented as "cannon fodder."

The film is also criticized for being a family film, dedicated to Spielberg's children. Tom Cruise's character is portrayed as a divorced father who hoards car parts and receives little positive attention from his complaining children. The article suggests that the script's weaknesses are exposed by the children's continued lamenting even as the world ends. The reviewer wishes Spielberg had sent a few tough guys on an impossible mission instead of focusing on the children, but acknowledges the need to appeal to a younger audience. The film avoids showing disturbing conflicts, with characters not dying but turning to dust, and scenes of violence being cut short by closing doors.

The report questions whether the film is intended to incite fear or alleviate it, noting that criticism might even lead to legal action.

Pro7 Special: "Making of...Krieg der Welten"

A Pro7 special on the making of "War of the Worlds" is mentioned, described as more of a long advertisement than a behind-the-scenes look. In this program, Steven Spielberg shared his views on science fiction films and aliens, including a segment on UFOs. Spielberg mentioned the Roswell UFO crash and its alleged relocation to Area 51, and then to Wright-Patterson Field in Dayton, Ohio. Spielberg stated, "I don't know if a spaceship was really dismantled in Area 51."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the analysis of UFO sightings and their potential explanations (including debunking and skepticism), the role of media in reporting on UFO phenomena, and the criticism of commercialization and perceived manipulation within the ufology community. The report also highlights the media's role in covering controversial events, particularly in relation to the film industry. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims in ufology, while also acknowledging the public's fascination with the topic. There is a strong emphasis on media criticism, particularly concerning censorship and the influence of commercial interests on reporting.

Title: CENAP-Report
Issue: Nr. 298
Date: February 2006

This issue of the CENAP-Report delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena, media influence, and scientific inquiry, with a particular focus on the 'War of the Worlds' narrative and its cultural impact.

Media Myth: 'War of the Worlds' and Mass Panic

The report critically examines the enduring myth of a mass panic caused by Orson Welles' 1938 radio dramatization of H.G. Wells' 'War of the Worlds'. While the broadcast is widely believed to have caused widespread fear and panic among listeners who mistook it for a real alien invasion, the CENAP-Report suggests this narrative is largely exaggerated. Citing Herbert Cantril's study, the article argues that the 'mass panic' was more of a brief irritation among a 'local population' rather than a civilization-wide hysteria. The report questions the scientific rigor of studies that perpetuated this myth, noting that only a small, pre-selected group was surveyed, and that many listeners were aware of the fictional nature of the broadcast.

The article traces the evolution of the 'War of the Worlds' story through various media, from the original novel to radio plays, films (including those by Steven Spielberg), musicals, television series, and computer games. It highlights how media innovations of the 19th century, like the telegraph and telephone, expanded human perception of space and time, and how science fiction became a way to process these new technological realities.

Spielberg and the Decline of UFO Sightings

The report touches upon Steven Spielberg's observations regarding a perceived decrease in UFO sightings. In June 2005, Spielberg expressed surprise that fewer UFOs are being reported despite the widespread availability of technology like video cameras, which should theoretically lead to more convincing evidence. He noted that the proliferation of such technology had not resulted in more compelling UFO evidence and that he himself had not encountered any definitive proof of alien visitation.

The Vatican's Search for Extraterrestrial Life

A significant portion of the report focuses on the Vatican's engagement with the question of extraterrestrial life. In July 2005, 25 young, top astronomers from 19 countries convened at the Vatican's observatory in Castel Gandolfo to discuss astrobiology and the search for alien life. Father Sabino Maffeo, an astronomer at the Vatican Observatory, stated that it is conceivable that God created extraterrestrial beings. The report highlights the Vatican's connection to the 'Vatican Observatory Research Group' in Tucson, Arizona, which utilizes advanced telescopes to study distant galaxies. The article also speculates on the profound theological implications if aliens were discovered and asked about their understanding of God and the Ten Commandments.

A Personal UFO Sighting in Mannheim

The report includes a detailed personal account of a UFO sighting by the author (presumably Werner Walter, given the context of the article) on the night of July 2, 2005, over Mannheim, Germany. While watching the Live 8 concert, the author observed a formation of approximately 40-50 yellowish-red-orange lights ascending vertically. These lights were described as having a yellowish core with an orange-red aura, moving in a way that was neither like fireworks nor typical miniature hot air balloons. The phenomenon lasted less than ten seconds before the lights vanished. The author compares the event to a 'compact unit' that expanded slightly as it ascended, noting that the lights were significantly larger than Jupiter. This event is presented as a potential 'UFO fleet' sighting or the most extraordinary 'firework' witnessed.

Werner Walter and CENAP

The report also features Werner Walter, a hobby astronomer from Mannheim, who has been explaining seemingly mysterious sky phenomena for 30 years. Walter, along with Hans-Jürgen Köhler, founded the 'Centrale Erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher Himmelsphänomene' (CENAP) in 1976 to demystify UFO sightings. Walter explains that many phenomena, such as bright lights in the sky, have rational explanations, like the planet Venus or meteors. He receives around 150 calls per year from people seeking explanations for what they see in the sky. The article notes that CENAP is known and its number is shared by planetariums and observatories.

The 'Marsianer' Myth and Media Influence

The article revisits the 'Marsianer' (Martian) media myth, linking it to the film 'War of the Worlds'. It discusses how the film's release, and similar science fiction narratives, can sometimes trigger UFO flaps or public interest in UFOs. The report mentions Donald Menzel's belief that the 1952 Washington UFO flap was inspired by the film 'The Day the Earth Stood Still'. It also notes that while films like 'Independence Day' and 'Akte X - Der Film' did not lead to significant UFO waves, the psychological induction of interest in UFOs and aliens remains a potent factor.

Fake UFOs and Media Manipulation

One section details an experiment by an alien UFO fan from Frankfurt who created a fake UFO video by compositing sequences from Spielberg's 'War of the Worlds' film with actual footage. The article explains the technical process involved, including 3D modeling, compositing, and editing, to create a convincing fake. This section serves to illustrate how easily UFO videos can be fabricated, emphasizing that even primitive methods can produce believable results with the right software and experience.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The CENAP-Report consistently adopts a critical stance towards sensationalism and unsubstantiated claims, particularly concerning UFO phenomena. It emphasizes the role of media in shaping public perception and creating myths, as exemplified by the 'War of the Worlds' case. The report encourages rational explanations for sky phenomena while acknowledging the ongoing scientific and public interest in the possibility of extraterrestrial life, as evidenced by the Vatican's involvement. The editorial stance appears to be one of informed skepticism, seeking to debunk hoaxes and provide factual context while remaining open to genuine scientific inquiry into the unknown.

Title: CENAP-Report
Issue: Nr. 298
Date: February 2006

This issue of the CENAP-Report details a perplexing UFO sighting by Werner Walter, a prominent UFO skeptic in Germany, and explores subsequent investigations and similar reports.

Werner Walter's Sighting and Initial Investigation

Werner Walter, a hobby astronomer and self-proclaimed "UFO Skeptic No. 1" in Germany, recounts a startling experience on the night of Saturday, July 2, 2005, at approximately 0:30 AM. While on his balcony in Mannheim, he observed what he described as a "totally crazy celestial phenomenon." He saw a "whole pack of 40-50 small glowing spheres, yellowish on the inside, reddish on the outside," ascending silently and without a smoke trail. These objects, each at least five times larger than the brightest star, rose rapidly and disappeared within two minutes. He noted that some objects "torkeled wildly" and "some lights circled each other," with occasional small glowing particles falling.

Walter, who has 30 years of experience investigating unusual aerial phenomena, was deeply perplexed. He immediately began an investigation, contacting the police (110), the local police outpost in Käfertal, the fire department, the regional airport, and regional radio stations. None had received any reports of unusual celestial events. Most contacts suggested the sightings were related to "disco-strobe lights," an explanation Walter found unsatisfactory as it didn't match his observation.

He also left his contact information with these agencies, hoping for any follow-up reports. The article notes that his phone number was published in the 'MM' (Mannheimer Morgen) newspaper, but he received no calls from potential witnesses that Sunday. This lack of corroboration led him to doubt his own spectacular observation, highlighting the rarity of a skeptical investigator becoming a witness.

Media Coverage and Public Reaction

On the same day as his sighting, Walter issued a press release. This was partially picked up by the 'Mannheimer Morgen' on Tuesday, July 5th, under the headline: "Mannheim UFO Skeptic Astonished: 'Either I saw the strangest fireworks of my life or a 'UFO Fleet'!'"

The article introduces Walter as a 30-year veteran of investigating unusual celestial phenomena and a leading UFO skeptic. He has previously explained numerous sightings to hundreds of callers. However, this event left him "absolutely astonished."

Search for a "Launch Site" and Potential Explanations

Walter considered the possibility that the objects ascended from the ground. He searched the area behind his apartment building, specifically a schoolyard, for any signs of a large gathering or event that might explain the phenomenon, but found nothing. His colleague, Hansjürgen Köhler, helped him analyze the trajectory, suggesting potential launch sites in the outskirts of Mannheim, including fields, the town of Straßenheim, and Ladenburg. Notably, a "corn maze" in Ladenburg, which featured a flying saucer model, had recently opened.

Further investigation considered the possibility of fireworks, especially given that July 4th (American Independence Day) was approaching, a time when US military units often celebrate. However, Walter's description of the objects' behavior – their prolonged stationary hover and silent ascent – did not align with typical fireworks.

Corroborating Reports from Other Locations

Walter's report gained traction. Stefan Sch. from Spardorf near Erlangen contacted him via Astronomie.de, reporting a similar sighting around midnight on the same Sunday: a swarm of small, orange-red, unidentified objects that slowly ascended and then vanished. He mentioned a nearby festival with fireworks, but the objects' behavior was distinct.

From Wetterzentrale.de, Udo P. in Jünkerath (Eifel) reported a large fireworks display but also noted strange "light spheres" that remained in the air for a long time before moving away at high speed, unlike typical lightning.

Michael B. from Vienna reported having observed a similar "UFO fleet" twice before from his terrace. These sightings involved yellow to orange spheres ascending rapidly and disappearing, with some exhibiting horizontal movement and pulsating light. He estimated the duration of these observations to be between 30-60 seconds.

Analysis and Skeptical Scrutiny

Walter and his colleagues at CENAP have conducted experiments with small hot-air balloons to simulate aerial phenomena. While these experiments produced impressive light displays, Walter felt his recent sighting was different and more complex, suggesting it was either a "mixture between fireworks and small hot-air balloons" or something entirely new.

He also referenced an article from the 'San Francisco Chronicle' titled "TEN THINGS YOU SHOULD DO IF YOU ENCOUNTER A UFO," which outlines recommendations from US-MUFON. Walter applied these guidelines to his own experience:

1. Stay calm and protect yourself: He felt he remained calm but not hysterical.
2. Be objective, eliminate other possibilities: He attempted this but still hesitated to label it a "true UFO."
3. Use a camcorder or camera: He did not do this, prioritizing observation over documentation.
4. Use a cassette recorder: Not applicable.
5. Ask witnesses to write down observations: He had no witnesses to discuss with.
6. Look for residual traces: None were found.
7. Estimate size: Not possible.
8. Determine distance, height, and speed: Not possible.
9. Encounters with aliens: Not applicable.
10. Report to a UFO research group: He did this, but felt it yielded no results.

Online Discussions and Community Reactions

Walter's report on Astronomie.info led to a response from a Bern resident who had a similar sighting on July 19, 2003, in Erlenbach ZH. This sighting involved 20-30 bright, glowing objects in a vertical line that hovered and then disappeared. The observer dismissed fireworks as an explanation due to the objects' duration and movement.

On the Alien.de forum, a user named "Rosenkohl" reacted aggressively to Walter's account, questioning his credibility and suggesting he was paid. This user defended the idea that UFO witnesses might be "psychos" and asserted that he and his colleagues had witnessed similar phenomena, even while on duty as police officers.

Walter found this reaction interesting, noting that his critical stance towards his own observation seemed to trigger defensive reactions and entrenched beliefs within the UFOlogy community. He criticized the community for focusing on "fantasies" as "UFO evidence" rather than objective analysis, suggesting a tendency towards "reality escape" and a reluctance to accept straightforward explanations.

The UFOlogy Landscape and Skeptical Challenges

The report delves into the broader UFOlogy landscape, describing it as a realm where "irrationality reigns" and skeptics are often ostracized. Walter contrasts the scientific approach with the "ufological faith" that he believes hinders logical inquiry. He criticizes "UFOlogy promoters" for creating a sense of "welfare" for believers, fostering an environment where "fantasies are loved" and "bringing down to the real world is hated."

He mentions a past incident involving Andreas Schneider, an alleged alien contactee, who falsely claimed Walter had agreed to a TV show. Walter also notes that some UFOlogists have spread rumors about him, linking him to neo-Nazis, to prevent him from appearing on broadcasts.

The article concludes by discussing the difficulty of engaging in a rational dialogue within the UFOlogy community, where "fantasies are treated as 'UFO evidence'" and objective information is often dismissed. Walter suggests that the UFOlogy community, driven by a desire for "reality escape," actively mystifies phenomena rather than seeking clear explanations, often portraying UFOs as something other than mundane objects (IFOs).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the nature of unexplained aerial phenomena, the challenges of objective investigation, the role of skepticism versus belief, and the dynamics within the UFOlogy community. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, emphasizing the need for rational analysis and the elimination of mundane explanations before considering extraordinary ones. The report highlights the personal struggle of a skeptic confronted with an experience that defies easy categorization, while also critiquing the broader UFOlogy culture for its perceived embrace of fantasy over fact.

This issue of the CENAP-Report, Nr. 298, dated February 2006, delves into various aspects of the UFO phenomenon, skepticism, and media portrayal. The report is critical of how information is presented and interpreted, particularly concerning UFO sightings and the role of media and skeptical voices.

Article 1: Personal UFO Sighting and Media Critique

The author begins by recounting a personal UFO sighting from September/October 2005, which was published in Bürgin's 'Mysteries' magazine as 'UFO-Skeptiker aus Mannheim sah eine 'UFO-Flotte''. The author expresses frustration with Werner Walter, a prominent UFO critic, who is known for providing 'rational' explanations for unusual events. The article suggests that Walter himself is now questioning his own skepticism, but implies that Bürgin may have already known the resolution to the case when writing his piece, accusing them of 'politics' by omitting information.

The author further criticizes a presentation by Dr. Jens Waldeck at the DEGUFO conference in 2005, titled "Wie wird man einen Skeptizisten los" (How to get rid of a skeptic), suggesting it was a 'pseudo-funny' reaction to the author's sighting. The author notes that the 'Mysteries' magazine did not provide a resolution in its November/December 2005 issue, and that the author's sighting and its supposed resolution were presented in the same source, CENAP-UFO-Newsticker, implying a deliberate omission of information to create 'secrets, riddles, phenomena'.

The report also mentions an editorial in 'Mysteries' questioning "Wie wirklich ist Wirklichkeit?" (How real is reality?), and reader letters praising the magazine for filling a 'market gap' and conducting 'thoroughly researched articles'. A sarcastic jab is made at the Kopp-Verlag's book promotion for Viktor Farkas' "Mythos Informationsgesellschaft", which claims that objective media suppress information and engage in disinformation, while books from Kopp-Verlag and magazines like 'Mysteries' supposedly reveal the 'absolute top topics of history', such as 'SS-Secret Letter about Johannes of Jerusalem discovered: Prophecy book - Himmler knew the future!' or 'Weather Chaos - US Physicist: Cosmic lightning caused flood'. The author sarcastically notes that this might appeal to certain readers.

Article 2: The Nature of Reality and UFOlogy

This section reflects on the nature of reality and the challenges of seeking spiritual answers. The author suggests that investigative journalists like Harald Schmidt or Horst Schlämmer should tackle the 'quackery' surrounding UFOlogy. The piece contrasts the scientific pursuit of enlightenment with the overwhelming appeal of UFO fantasies, which are driven by emotion and the soul rather than intellect. It highlights the need for both truth-tellers and truth-hearers, and questions whether politicians would be as eager to spread truth if it were as attractive as nudity in the media. The author points out that by blaming politicians, we also point the finger at ourselves, asking if we truly want to be fully informed about political challenges and willing to face the effort of solving them.

This creates a vicious cycle of not wanting to hear and not wanting to speak. The author notes that while it seems impossible, the 'ufological revolution' is being pushed forward with a 'divine plan' behind nature, driven by an astonishing self-confidence. However, this is seen as creating a 'reign of terror' for serious UFO research, leading to accusations of 'betrayal'.

Article 3: Fireball Sighting on July 2, 2005

This section details a specific sighting of a fireball on the evening of July 2, 2005. The report from the 'Feuerkugel-Netzwerk' describes a bright fireball observed in Freudenberg, Brandenburg, Germany, moving parallel to the horizon. Initially, it appeared as a single cigar-shaped object, but later revealed itself to be three elliptical fireballs, with the first one appearing slightly smaller. The objects moved for about four seconds and were colorless and bright. Towards the end, the two front objects exhibited a 'fireworks effect' below them, appearing as thin meteors. The author notes that the apparent brightness was comparable to the full moon and that no sounds were heard. The report speculates that the event might have been a meteorite fall near the German-Polish border and requests witnesses to report to www.ausgangspunkt-erde.de or the AKM association.

Article 4: Historical UFO Investigations (Project SIGN, GRUDGE, Blue Book)

This section delves into the history of US Air Force UFO investigations, starting with the 'Rocketship' sighting of July 24, 1948, which involved reports of 'wingless cigar-shaped or rocket-shaped objects' with 'sparking flame jets'. This led to the famous 'Estimate of the Situation' by Project SIGN, which considered 'interplanetary visitors' as a possible cause for UFOs. The author criticizes the initial misjudgment, noting that astronomer Hynek later re-evaluated the event as a 'shattering fireball-bolide'. The article points out that UFOlogists later claimed the event could not be explained by astronomical or meteorological phenomena and was declared a 'meteor' by the Pentagon due to 'sinister machinations'.

Donald Keyhoe is mentioned for taking the assessment seriously and advocating for the public to be informed about flying saucers, fearing a 'mass hysteria' upon the initial disclosure. The article states that the 'Estimate of the Situation' was rejected due to lack of evidence. It also highlights the exclusive use of intelligence officers in Project SIGN, who were unfamiliar with the subject, contrasting this with the later GROLL project which involved public relations officers.

The text discusses the bureaucratic delays in reporting UFO sightings, with reports sometimes arriving months late, and investigators reading about events in newspapers before receiving official notification. It also touches upon the internal skepticism within the Air Force regarding UFOs, with some viewing it as a mere 'side project'. Ruppelt's efforts to improve the reporting system and ensure that the Pentagon received monthly status reports are detailed. The article mentions the development of a UFO questionnaire with Ohio State University and the implementation of a newspaper clipping service to stay informed.

The lack of a proper library for the UFO project is noted, with Hynek reportedly using funds from his own USAF contract for UFO books. Ruppelt, with the support of Cabell, managed to reorganize the project, which eventually led to the establishment of Project BLUE BOOK. Ruppelt was allowed direct access to ATIC (Air Technical Intelligence Center) departments, including analysis and radar sections. This period also saw the first involvement of scientific advisors from the US Air Force.

The article further explains that the initial focus of the investigations was whether UFOs posed a threat to national security, particularly if they were Soviet secret weapons. The Technical Intelligence Division at the Air Material Command (AMC) also investigated this possibility. The response was negative, with lingering uncertainty.

The text mentions the idea of a network of diffraction grating cameras for all USAF bases to photograph UFOs, but this project was too expensive and shelved. Ruppelt also ensured that Air Force Instruction 200-5 (April 5, 1952) mandated that intelligence officers at all USAF bases send preliminary UFO sighting reports directly to ATIC via telegram, bypassing unclear command chains. This was a significant change, allowing Blue Book personnel to communicate directly with the observers.

The author criticizes the amateurish infrastructure of the UFO project, noting the lack of a proper library and the fact that Hynek had to use his own funds for books. Ruppelt's efforts to improve the situation, including obtaining a UFO questionnaire and a newspaper clipping service, are highlighted. The article also mentions the involvement of Soviet Foreign Minister Gromyko's dismissive remarks about UFOs as 'discus throws' by Soviet athletes.

Article 5: Wiesbaden UFO Sighting and Explanation

This section reports on a series of mysterious lights observed over Wiesbaden on July 12, 2005. Multiple readers reported seeing strange light points, described as a formation ascending like on a string, or lamps larger than stars that then burned out. The German Weather Service in Offenbach was unable to provide an explanation, suggesting 'northern lights' but noting it didn't fit the descriptions. The air traffic control in Langen also denied any known aircraft movements that could explain the phenomenon. The police reported no unusual occurrences.

The author notes that this description closely matches a sighting they had in Mannheim on the night of July 2/3, 2005. However, a subsequent report from the 'Wiesbadener Kurier' on July 16, 2005, revealed that the Wiesbaden lights were a 'silent fireworks' installation by Peter Gschwend, involving helium balloons with fireworks. The explanation was provided by Elisabeth Lutz-Kopp, who identified it as a 'silent fireworks' display at a slaughterhouse.

Article 6: Astrologer Sues NASA

This section reports on a Russian astrologer, Marina Bai, who sued NASA for 8.7 billion rubles (250 million Euros). Bai claimed that the bombardment of Comet Tempel 1 by NASA disrupted her horoscope and violated her spiritual rights. She had previously attempted to prevent the comet impact through legal means but failed. Her legal counsel, Alexander Molokow, argued that NASA's experiment had altered the comet's sphere, thus distorting Bai's horoscope. The article dismisses this claim as nonsense, even by astrological standards, as only stars and planets are said to influence horoscopes, not comets. The author references a book review on space law from about 10 years prior.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the critical examination of UFO reports, the skepticism surrounding them, and the role of media in shaping public perception. The author consistently questions official explanations and highlights instances of alleged disinformation or omission of facts. There is a strong emphasis on historical UFO investigations and the bureaucratic processes involved. The issue also contrasts scientific inquiry with pseudoscientific beliefs like astrology, advocating for a more grounded and evidence-based approach to understanding phenomena. The editorial stance is clearly one of skepticism towards sensationalism and a call for transparency and factual reporting in the UFO field.

Title: CENAP-Report
Issue: Nr. 298
Date: February 2006

This issue of the CENAP-Report delves into several topics related to space, law, and unexplained phenomena. It features discussions on space law, the definition and discovery of celestial bodies, and the highly anticipated launch of the Space Shuttle Discovery, alongside a reported UFO sighting.

Space Law and the 'Handbuch des Weltraumrechts'

The report begins by referencing the 'Handbuch des Weltraumrechts' (Handbook of Space Law), edited by Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel and published by Carl Heymanns Verlag in Cologne in 1991. It touches upon the reactions to a report about space law, noting that many astronomical forums and media outlets responded with skepticism or dismissive comments, similar to reactions to UFO reports. The article highlights that astrological 'teachings' focus on planets and stars but not comets, suggesting that any claims linking comets to horoscopes are unfounded, even for astrologers.

RA Jens Lorek contributes information regarding 'Weltraumrecht' (space law). He discusses the debate surrounding the boundary between airspace and outer space, and the implications for shooting down aircraft versus satellites. A key point raised is the financial aspect, specifically the idea that states located under the geostationary orbit might charge a 'usage fee' for satellites launched by others. This is framed within the context of international law, referencing the principle that 'sovereignty extends as far as weapons can reach,' reminiscent of historical maritime claims (3-mile and 12-mile territorial waters) based on cannon range from the 18th and early 20th centuries. The concept that 'a right only exists if it can be effectively exercised' is also mentioned, with the hypothetical scenario of using a nuclear weapon to project sovereignty up to 150 million kilometers. The 'Space Treaty' (Weltraumvertrag WRV) from January 27, 1967, and a 'Moon Treaty' from December 18, 1979, are also cited.

Discovery of the 'Tenth Planet' (2003UB313)

The issue reports on the discovery of a potential 'tenth planet' in our solar system, based on a dpa news agency report from July 30, 2005. Three US astronomers, using data from October 2003, identified an object larger than Pluto. The object, provisionally named 2003UB313, has an extremely elliptical orbit with a semi-major axis of 97 Astronomical Units (AU) and an eccentricity of 0.441. Lorek questions whether this object qualifies as a planet, arguing that planets should have nearly circular orbits within the ecliptic plane, originating from the solar system's primordial dust disk. He contrasts this with Pluto's inclined and eccentric orbit, and suggests that 2003UB313 might belong to the Oort Cloud.

Silvia Kowollik provides further details, noting that astronomers have generally agreed on a definition where a planet constitutes at least 90% of the total mass of objects in its orbital region. She points out that Ceres, the largest asteroid, does not meet this criterion. Pluto, despite not meeting the 90% mass rule, has been considered the ninth planet for over 70 years due to historical reasons. Kowollik emphasizes that 2003UB313, being at nearly 100 AU, is indeed located in the Oort Cloud, which is considered a significant aspect of the discovery.

The report also touches upon the astrological implications of this discovery, referencing an 'Abendzeitung' article titled 'New Planet Discovered - All Horoscopes Wrong?'. An RTL expert, Antonia Langsdorf, is quoted stating that the new planet would at most be an addition and not invalidate existing horoscopes, as astrology has a long history and has adapted to the discovery of Uranus (1781), Neptune (1846), and Pluto (1930).

UFO Sighting in Berlin

A section titled '>>Man sieht den Lichtfinger nicht immer<<' (One doesn't always see the light finger) details an interview with Werner Walter of the CENAP Ufo-Hotline. A witness from Berlin reported seeing a strange, yellow, elliptical light in the sky over a park one night. The object moved but was not an airplane. The witness described it as a diffuse yellowish light that appeared like a cloud but wasn't. The sighting lasted about five minutes, after which the sky became overcast and the light disappeared. Walter speculates it could have been a light projection reflected in the clouds, noting that a 'light finger' or beam is not always visible and requires atmospheric conditions like haze or rain.

Space Shuttle Discovery Launch and Visibility

A significant portion of the report is dedicated to the planned launch of the Space Shuttle Discovery (Mission STS-114) and its potential visibility over Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. The launch was initially scheduled for July 13, 2005, at 21:51 MESZ from Florida. Calculations suggested the shuttle, possibly shedding its external tank ('E.T.'), could be visible around 22:10 to 22:14 MESZ. Werner Walter of CENAP predicted a 'brightly shining, unusual flying object' appearing from the west and disappearing towards the east.

The media extensively covered the event, with news agencies like dpa, Bild, Yahoo News, Spiegel-Online, and various newspapers reporting on the potential sighting. Austrian news agency APA also reported on the event. The report notes that the jettisoning of the large external tank, which is 15 stories high and contains two million liters of liquid oxygen and hydrogen, could be a spectacular event. The tank was expected to burn up upon re-entry into the atmosphere.

However, the launch was postponed on July 13th at 19:45 due to a minor technical problem with a measuring probe on the external tank. This led to disappointment for many who had gathered to watch. The report details numerous media inquiries received by CENAP, including from radio stations and newspapers, seeking information on how and when the shuttle could be observed.

Despite the postponement, the anticipation remained. The report mentions that even when the shuttle is high in the sky, illuminated by the sun, it can appear as a bright point, similar to the ISS. Silvia Kowollik's observations over 15 years suggest that shuttles and tanks appear as bright yellow to white and orange to red points, respectively, with the tank appearing darker due to its matte surface.

Daniel Fischer from 'Skyweek' noted that due to the timing of the launch window, it might be too bright to see the orbiter and tank after the start, except under specific conditions. The report also discusses the 'Phantom-Discovery' phenomenon, where people who had gathered to watch the postponed launch reported seeing objects they mistook for the shuttle. These were later identified as the planet Jupiter or other misidentifications.

Media Coverage and CENAP's Role

The report highlights the extensive media interest in CENAP and Werner Walter's work. Journalists from various outlets contacted CENAP for interviews and information, sometimes expressing surprise that CENAP is a UFO research group. One WDR editor commented that CENAP provides scientific clarification on exciting topics, operating voluntarily. The report suggests that CENAP has become a recognized source for information on astronomical and astronautical topics, with media professionals and the public turning to them when needed.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of CENAP-Report demonstrates a recurring theme of scrutinizing official narratives and scientific claims, whether in space law, astronomy, or aviation. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, encouraging readers to question definitions and reported phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on providing factual information and analysis, often debunking sensationalized claims or providing alternative explanations. The report also highlights the significant role of media in shaping public perception and the challenges of distinguishing between genuine phenomena and misinterpretations or hoaxes. The CENAP organization positions itself as a source of objective information and research in these complex fields.

This issue of CENAP-Report, dated February 2006, delves into the intersection of spaceflight, media coverage, and public perception, particularly focusing on events from the summer of 2005. It critiques the 'media hysteria' surrounding space missions and the reporting of astronomical phenomena, contrasting it with scientific realities and discoveries.

Space Shuttle Discovery: Media Hysteria and Reality

The report begins by detailing the incident where a piece of insulating foam detached from the Space Shuttle Discovery's external tank, echoing the catastrophic failure of the Columbia mission. This event triggered significant media attention, with headlines drawing parallels to 'Apollo 13' and raising fears of a grounded shuttle fleet and the potential end of the ISS program. The media speculated on various rescue scenarios, from sheltering the crew on the International Space Station to a special rescue mission by the Atlantis. The article highlights the 'media hysteria' that ensued, with constant reporting on new problems and 'chaos scenarios.'

Despite the dramatic narratives, the immediate focus was on the Discovery's repair work, which involved astronauts manually removing white sealing strips from the heat shield. This was broadcast live, and its successful completion was met with jubilation at NASA, signaling a new era of space exploration. However, further minor issues, such as a problem with an insulation mat near the main front window, briefly caused concern but were deemed not to jeopardize the crew's return.

In Germany, major broadcasters like ARD, ZDF, Phoenix, N-TV, and N24 provided extensive coverage. The landing was delayed by 24 hours due to bad weather, keeping the public in suspense. The article suggests that this heightened attention, while perhaps driven by media dramatization, also educated the public about the realities of spaceflight in the 21st century, portraying it as a venture with inherent risks, not the seamless endeavor once imagined.

The report contrasts the romanticized 'Vision of Space Exploration' with the harsh reality of high costs and persistent challenges, noting that the ambitious plans for manned flights to Mars from the 1960s and 70s have not materialized.

The 'Fireball Bolide' Phenomenon and Media Misinterpretation

A significant portion of the report is dedicated to numerous sightings of bright, fast-moving objects across the German sky in August 2005, coinciding with the Perseid meteor shower. These events, described as 'glowing pieces with a tail,' 'reddish glowing objects,' or 'reddish elongated metal eggs with colorful condensation trails,' were often reported to the CENAP (Central Research Network for Extraordinary Sky Phenomena). The article notes that people, sensitized by the media coverage of the Space Shuttle, were more inclined to interpret these natural phenomena as potentially related to the shuttle or even UFOs.

One specific incident on the night of August 10th, 2005, involved a 'ghostly, silent appearance' described as a 'greenish-white, elongated sphere' that broke into several pieces, leaving a smoke trail. Similar reports came from Griesheim, Hennef, and Buchen im Odenwald. While some witnesses speculated about UFOs, the author and other experts identified these as 'fireball bolides,' exceptionally bright meteors, the 'big brothers' of normal shooting stars.

The report criticizes the media's tendency to sensationalize these events, often linking them to UFOs and conspiracy theories. It highlights how the media's focus on the Space Shuttle's issues may have led the public to misinterpret natural celestial events. The article also points out the discrepancy between the media's portrayal of meteor showers as spectacular 'fireworks' and the actual, often underwhelming, reality.

Perseid Meteor Shower: Disappointment and Media Myth

The article expresses frustration with the annual media hype surrounding the Perseid meteor shower, which is consistently exaggerated. Despite predictions of 'hundreds of meteors per hour,' the actual experience, even for dedicated observers, was often limited to a few dozen over several hours. The report attributes this persistent myth to the media's reliance on sensationalized imagery, such as historical drawings of meteor showers, rather than factual reporting. The author argues that journalists fail to critically question these established narratives, perpetuating a 'media myth' about meteor showers.

Other Astronomical News

Beyond the shuttle and meteor events, the issue briefly mentions two other astronomical developments from the summer of 2005:

1. The discovery of a potential '10th planet' beyond Pluto, which the International Astronomical Union (IAU) initially hesitated to classify as a planet, preferring the term 'Trans-Neptunian object.'
2. The discovery of water ice on the surface of a crater near the Martian North Pole by the ESA's Mars Express probe.

The report also touches upon the challenges faced by NASA in developing a new foam insulation for the shuttle's external tank, a project that took 2.5 years and involved significant resources but ultimately failed to solve the problem, leading the author to question NASA's ability to tackle complex UFO issues if they struggle with basic engineering.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the pervasive influence of media on public perception of scientific events, the tendency for sensationalism and misinterpretation, and the contrast between romanticized visions of space exploration and its complex, costly reality. The editorial stance is critical of media hype, particularly concerning UFO phenomena and meteor showers, advocating for a more grounded and factual approach to reporting. The article emphasizes that spaceflight remains a risky and expensive endeavor, far from the effortless futuristic scenarios often depicted.

Title: CENAP-Report
Issue: Nr. 298
Date: February 2006

This issue of the CENAP-Report delves into various celestial phenomena, media coverage of these events, and investigative approaches. It critically examines public expectations versus the reality of meteor showers and discusses recent sightings and their analysis.

Meteor Showers: Expectations vs. Reality

The report begins by referencing a 'Neue Zürcher Zeitung' headline from November 1998 about the 'Leonidensturm' (Leonid storm) of November 17th, which predicted an unusually strong shower. It notes that predictions often mention the danger to satellites and cite past spectacular events, such as the November 17, 1966, meteor shower in the USA, where observers counted up to 2400 meteors per minute. The author expresses skepticism about the accuracy of such high counts, questioning how they could be precisely measured. The article then explores user reports from Wetterzentrale.de about meteor showers.

One user recalls the 1991 Leonid shower as the strongest they experienced, with over 100 meteors per hour, some leaving long, glowing trails. Another user reports witnessing over 100 meteors per hour during the November 2002 Leonids from Manhattan, Kansas, describing it as a very impressive experience. A different user recounts their 'Perseiden-Max' (Perseid maximum) in 1983, observing over 200 meteors between 1:00 and 4:30 AM on August 11-12, including impressive fireballs. They noted that many fainter meteors were only visible from the corner of the eye, while others were still admiring the afterglow of a previous fireball. This user also recalls the 1977 Perseids, estimating 40-50 meteors per minute, describing it as an incredibly impressive and unbelievable spectacle.

The report questions the representativeness of these observations, noting that despite predictions of numerous major meteor streams over nearly 30 years, only about four 'major events' have truly lived up to expectations. This leads to the conclusion that frequently raising public hopes and expectations twice a year is not justified.

Spaceflight and Media Coverage

The article touches upon the media's focus on potential dangers during space missions, using the US space shuttle DISCOVERY as an example. It suggests that media outlets are eager for dramatic events that could be broadcast live. Similarly, meteor showers are often framed in terms of the danger they pose to satellites in near-Earth orbit. However, the report points out that no satellite has yet been 'shot down' by a meteor, whereas satellites have more frequently been paralyzed by 'solar winds'.

A Notable Sighting: August 13, 2005

A significant event occurred on August 13, 2005, when a bright bolide was observed. A witness from Allersberg reported seeing a bolide around 22:20, described as approximately 6-7 magnitude, with a white color, a long tail, and a slow, weakening trajectory. Another observer in Tübingen described a reddish bolide head leaving a wide, glowing trail that persisted for several seconds. This bolide was seen moving horizontally from PEG towards CAS and PER.

A staff member from the Stuttgart Observatory speculated whether the phenomenon might be related to descending space debris. They observed the bolide on a nearly horizontal path from Andromeda towards the Big Dipper. They suggested it could be an 'earthgrazer' that did not fully burn up, but instead bounced off the Earth's atmosphere. The object was noted for its unusual behavior of repeatedly becoming brighter, changing its flight path, and then dimming, likening it to a stone skipping across water.

Another report from Astronomie.de described a very bright and slow meteor observed around 22:19 in Nordhessen, which became brighter than even the brightest Iridium flares before disappearing with a faint reddish glow. The observer estimated its altitude at 15 degrees above the horizon and its trajectory as nearly parallel to the horizon, slightly ascending.

From Straubing, a witness confirmed seeing a bright, fast-moving 'smoke'/'light trail' that faded within 20 seconds, originating from the direction of 70 Aqu to the south, at an altitude of 28 degrees. They suggested it might be a Perseid.

In Munich, two observers at 22:19 on August 13, 2005, witnessed a similar object flying overhead. They described it as slow, with a long-lasting light, and estimated its duration at 10 seconds. They compared its brightness to an 8er Iridium Flare, noting it was slower, less dazzling, reddish, and 3-5 times larger. They did not observe a smoke trail.

Investigation of a 'Flying Saucer' Image

The report then shifts to an investigation initiated by a message from Marcel K., concerning a Google Earth satellite image from Lancashire, UK. The image showed a large, round object that appeared to be hovering above the ground, resembling a 'flying saucer'. The object was described as dirty reddish-brown with a shadow cast on the ground.

The location was identified as 53° 33'05.62" N, 2° 51'43.28" W. The image was considered the most concrete photographic evidence of a material, clearly defined object related to UFOs from a satellite or aerial perspective. The report provides background on Google Earth, explaining its function as a service that allows users to view detailed satellite and aerial photos of any location on Earth.

Initial analysis and discussions among UFO enthusiasts and researchers led to the conclusion that the object was likely a water tower. Further investigation using other mapping services like multimap.com, with different lighting conditions and at different times of the year, confirmed the presence of a structure consistent with a water tower, including a shadow. The 'shadow' was analyzed and found to be consistent with shadows cast by buildings in the vicinity, and an 'indentation' on the object was attributed to geological unevenness.

Other Mentions

The issue also briefly mentions a report from the 'Pforzheimer Zeitung' about a model airplane event in Bad Wildbad-Aichelberg, where at night, model airplanes with lights were compared to celestial lights or UFOs. Additionally, an orange fireball was reported over Berlin on July 12, 2005, observed for 2-3 minutes, with a size estimate larger than a satellite or airplane.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific investigation of unexplained aerial phenomena (UAP), the role of media in reporting such events, and the critical analysis of eyewitness accounts and photographic evidence. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards sensationalism and a preference for rational explanations, while still acknowledging the interest and challenge presented by unusual sightings. The use of tools like Google Earth for investigation is highlighted as a modern approach to analyzing such cases. The report emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary research and encourages readers to contribute information.

Title: CENAP-Report
Issue: Nr. 298
Date: February 2006

This issue of the CENAP-Report delves into the emerging trend of using internet tools like Google Earth for UFO research, often leading to misidentifications and the creation of 'internet UFO hobbies'. It highlights how readily available satellite imagery, once highly classified, is now being scrutinized by the public for evidence of extraterrestrial phenomena.

The 'Omskirk Map' UFO Case

The report details an incident where a water tower in the UK, near Ormskirk in Lancashire, was identified from a Google Earth image and initially mistaken for a UFO. The headline "The water tower on Scarth Hill that looks suspiciously like a UFO" is quoted, emphasizing the visual resemblance. The article explains that a user on the forum "www.b3ta.com" created a GIF animation of the object, only later realizing it was a water tower. The report notes the ring on top of the tower and its 'bright trunk' contributing to the UFO-like appearance, especially under certain weather conditions. This case is presented as an example of how easily terrestrial objects can be misinterpreted as UFOs in satellite imagery.

The New Internet 'UFO Hobby': Searching Earth's Aerial and Satellite Images

This section introduces the phenomenon of the public actively searching through the vast amount of aerial and satellite data now accessible via platforms like Google Earth. It explains that much of this data originates from formerly top-secret CIA 'Keyhole' reconnaissance satellites, which were previously inaccessible to the public due to national security concerns. The availability of this material has spurred a global community of alien and UFO enthusiasts to hunt for 'hidden UFO evidence'. The report mentions a previous incident in May that caused a stir in the UFO scene involving an image over Florida, which was later identified as condensation drops.

Skeptical UFO Research and Scientific Cooperation

Werner Walter, from the UFO-Skeptiker-Netzwerk CENAP, is presented as a key figure in investigating such cases. His team, including aerial and satellite image analysts, was tasked with finding an earthly explanation for the Ormskirk 'UFO'. Walter expresses his expectation of a flood of similar 'pseudo-UFO evidence' as UFO fans increasingly scrutinize satellite images. He views this as a sign of the decline of the UFO-Alien enthusiast community, which he has observed for 30 years.

Walter emphasizes that the clarification of UFO cases, including the Ormskirk incident, relies heavily on 'information management'. He argues that accurate and background information is the core business of UFO research. The report highlights the successful collaboration between skeptical UFO research (CENAP) and scientific methods as a model, noting that such cooperation is not always common, especially with organizations like MUFON-CES. The article posits that UFO research should aim to explain phenomena objectively, contrasting this with past 'mythologization' and a 'desperate fight' to retain unexplained cases.

Media and UFO Propaganda

The report criticizes media outlets for contributing to confusion and engaging in 'UFO propaganda'. A prime example cited is the 1994 NDR production "UFO-Reportage: Und es gibt sie doch" (UFO Reportage: And they do exist), which garnered high ratings but was internally disputed. The report mentions an 'uprising' via dpa that led to an ARD administrative board meeting. Professor Wolfgang Frühwald described the broadcast as an 'entertainment program' disguised as science, citing information deficits that could have a detrimental effect due to television's wide reach. ARD Program Director Dr. Günter Struwe admitted the program used a 'naive journalistic approach' rather than a rigorous scientific one. Despite these criticisms, the report suggests the program's 'blending out' of these issues was key to its high ratings.

CENAP's Role in UFO Media Coverage

Werner Walter states that journalists frequently acknowledge CENAP's prominence in UFO-related media coverage, admitting they 'cannot get around' him. He asserts that CENAP is a primary source for UFO information, especially since 2000, and that other media outlets that do not engage with CENAP effectively exclude themselves from the UFO discourse. He points out that even smaller media outlets can reach CENAP when necessary, questioning why larger media would not be able to.

Further Misidentifications: 'Crop Circles' and 'Terraforming'

The report then discusses another case involving a Google Earth image showing circular patterns in a desert landscape, initially mistaken for 'crop circles' or 'natural supernatural phenomena' near Arizona. However, it was identified as a result of 'terraforming' or, more specifically, a central pivot irrigation system. The article includes contributions from readers and experts who identified similar circular irrigation patterns in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, and Iraq, explaining how the rotating sprinklers create these visible fields.

Conclusion

The issue concludes by returning to the 'reality of life', suggesting that many perceived UFO phenomena are explainable through terrestrial means, scientific investigation, and accurate information. The report underscores the importance of critical thinking and scientific methodology in distinguishing genuine mysteries from misinterpretations and hoaxes, particularly in the age of easily accessible digital imagery.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the misinterpretation of satellite and aerial imagery as UFOs, the role of the internet in disseminating such claims, and the critical stance of CENAP in debunking these phenomena through scientific investigation and information management. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, emphasizing the need for evidence-based explanations and criticizing media sensationalism and 'UFO propaganda'. The report advocates for a scientific approach to UFO research, prioritizing objective analysis over mythologization.