CENAP Report - No 287

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP - REPORT
Issue: Nr. 287
Date: December 2003
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of CENAP REPORT is described as one of the oldest German, non-commercial UFO journals, published as a private periodical. The editor-in-chief and publisher is Werner Walter, located in Mannheim.

Main Articles and Content

30 Years of Werner Walter and CENAP (Continuation)

This section, a continuation from a previous online report, features Werner Walter's reflections on his three decades of involvement in UFO research. He notes a decline in public interest in UFOlogy, attributing it partly to 'oversaturation' and the hijacking of the scientific study by pop culture and 'crackpots'. Walter emphasizes the lack of concrete evidence for extraterrestrial visitors and criticizes the persistent narrative of government cover-ups. He observes a shift towards conspiracy theories, especially after events like 9/11, which he sees as a new 'adventure land' for conspiracy fanatics. Walter stresses the importance of human free will and the need for scientific thinking, cautioning against succumbing to superstition, astrology, the paranormal, and charlatans. He advocates for doubt, skepticism, and curiosity.

Walter discusses how UFOlogy, once popular among young people, has been somewhat sidelined, but conspiracy theories have surged, fueled by books and media coverage in 2003. He critiques the tendency for people to believe in half-truths and the appeal of conspiracy theories, which offer simple explanations for complex events.

He analyzes the phenomenon of conspiracy theories, noting their historical presence and their ability to provide a sense of understanding, especially for those with limited information. Walter points out that these theories often create elaborate narratives to explain 'great misfortunes' and that the uncritical acceptance by the public is a key to their success. He argues that many UFO and paranormal researchers, like conspiracy theorists, start with a conclusion and then seek evidence to support it, often ignoring contradictory information.

Walter highlights the role of mental programming in seeing conspiracies where none exist. He suggests that some 'hot' UFO reports might simply resolve themselves and disappear. He criticizes those who insist on their 'critical perception science' without proper investigation, often omitting or distorting facts. The article references a 'Zeit' magazine piece from September 11, 2003, titled "One delusion supports another - Why the left is falling for conspiracy theories about 9/11," by Jörg Lau. This piece noted the shift of conspiracy thinking from the right to the left, with figures like Mathias Bröckers, Andreas von Bülow, and Gerhard Wisnewski being cited as examples.

Walter describes his own 30-year journey in UFO research, moving from a fascination with 'fantastic stories' and 'mass sightings' to a more critical and investigative approach. He criticizes the tendency within the UFO community to remain superficial, preferring 'entry-level' engagement rather than deep investigation. He notes that many UFO enthusiasts are not interested in a balanced view of pro and contra arguments and prefer to stay on the surface, even if they consider themselves 'experts'.

He observes that UFO enthusiasts often react irrationally when their misjudgments are pointed out, becoming 'amok' in their fantasies. Walter believes that UFOs are not independent phenomena but are created by human observers as a tool of evolution for the mind. He questions if the UFO phenomenon acts as a 'cosmic shaman' for our collective consciousness, with observers contributing 50% to the phenomenon's creation through their interpretations and biases.

Walter expresses surprise at how far his own research has taken him over 30 years, contrasting it with his earlier, more conventional approach. He suggests that the UFO phenomenon persists because humans project their desires and dreams onto it, making their lives less boring. He criticizes the 'childishly naive mindset' and 'repression' often found in UFOlogy, likening 'flying saucers' to a 'Fata Morgana' that people create themselves. He calls for a 'reform' in UFO research, moving away from uncritical acceptance towards a more grounded approach.

He argues that UFO experiences can reveal hidden human potentials and connections to nature. He posits that humans perceive the world through their own psychological and spiritual structures, and that UFOs are perceived through these dominant, evolving frameworks. He concludes that the UFO phenomenon is a projection of human desires and that understanding this is key to resolving many UFO-related mysteries.

UFOs and Media Criticism

This section, starting on page 22, likely examines how UFO phenomena are reported and interpreted by the media. Walter's critical stance suggests an analysis of how media shapes public perception of UFOs, potentially contributing to sensationalism or the spread of misinformation.

Pseudo-Rätsel Kornkreise (Pseudo-Riddles: Crop Circles)

This section, beginning on page 52, addresses the phenomenon of crop circles. The term 'pseudo-riddles' implies a critical examination of crop circles, suggesting they are not genuine mysteries but rather man-made or easily explainable phenomena, challenging the more fantastical interpretations.

Vermischtes/UFO-Sommer 2003 (Miscellaneous/UFO Summer 2003)

This section, starting on page 70, appears to be a collection of miscellaneous UFO-related news, reports, or observations from the summer of 2003. It might include brief accounts of sightings, discussions, or other relevant items that don't fit into the more structured articles.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFOlogy, media criticism, conspiracy theories, and skepticism. The editorial stance, as articulated by Werner Walter, is one of critical inquiry, advocating for scientific methodology, skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims, and a rejection of uncritical belief in paranormal or extraterrestrial phenomena. The magazine aims to demystify UFOs and promote a more rational and evidence-based approach to understanding these reports, often contrasting with the more sensationalist or conspiratorial narratives prevalent in popular culture and some segments of the UFO community.

This issue of CENAP-Report, dated December 2003, delves into the complexities and criticisms surrounding UFOlogy. The publication questions the validity of 'research' in the field, suggesting it often devolves into sensationalism and anecdotal evidence rather than rigorous investigation. The cover headline, "Die größten Bluffs der Welt" (The biggest bluffs in the world), immediately sets a critical tone.

"Ahnungen" vs. Rationality

The lead article begins by discussing the emotional 'hunches' that often accompany the UFO topic, contrasting them with rational comprehension. The author expresses doubt about whether rationality is even applicable to this subject. An anecdote is shared where a person named Alex is recommended to read more books by Fiebag, while another individual, Roth, wishes to avoid any UFO discussions. The author notes that the core issue is not a lack of extraterrestrial life, but rather a resistance to acknowledging it, which is deemed an "outdated way of thinking."

The author reflects on a personal reaction to a statement, which was met with a dismissive "no comment." This highlights a recurring problem: the UFO question is often trivialized and elevated to the level of popular culture and media portrayals of E.T., without encouraging critical thinking. This leads to the misconception that sensationalist UFO literature and congresses are the primary sources of information. The report criticizes the tendency to dismiss opposing viewpoints as "anti-UFOlogy" or "UFO-enemies," labeling them as "ideologically motivated" rather than objectively reasoned.

The Superficiality of UFOlogy

The report argues that the UFO phenomenon is often approached superficially, with explanations limited to hypotheses that have not been thoroughly debated. The "shimmering surface" of the topic is seen as so fascinating and confusing that it prevents a deeper search for solutions. The author criticizes promoters of the phenomenon for spreading untruths, even knowingly, to manipulate the public. The desire for deeper investigation is sometimes framed as a lack of courage on the part of researchers, but the author asserts it is a lack of will and ability.

The article criticizes the tendency for UFOlogists to use their "artistic talents" to gain prominence, overshadowing serious research. These leading figures are portrayed as "show figures" who are more powerful and significant than they truly are, ideologically distorted. They selectively release information, contributing to a "complex entanglement" of UFOlogy that appeals to fans through narrative devices and stylistic techniques, creating an aesthetic complexity that encourages "rereading."

The Role of Mystery and Symbolism

Beyond the cliché-ridden ambiguity and mysteriously presented elements, the texts often pose artificial questions that are not answered, or that raise doubts about the credibility of the questioner. The use of symbols and imagery from myths and cultural history is employed to create new, modern, and sensual narratives within the space age context. This is likened to avant-garde art, creating a general, mysterious ambiguity that invites thought and association, turning the UFO field into a form of "art."

The narrative structure often employs cliffhangers, a technique common in popular entertainment, especially since the field is largely cultivated by professional writers who promote their other works. These writers use stylistic elements from earlier eras to position themselves against academic rationalism, blurring the lines between reality and simulation.

The "Explanation Deficit" and Cultural Context

The report suggests that the "explanation deficit" in UFO phenomena persists because people tend to "cloud" themselves and only scratch the surface, fitting the phenomenon into hypotheses that are far from fully discussed. The author believes that this superficial approach is a cultural process and a social phenomenon. The report poses the question: "Are you still dreaming, or are you researching?" regarding the future viability of UFOlogy.

UFO sightings are often associated with darkness, leading to them being perceived as mere light phenomena. The field of "UFOlogy" is described as having been a critique-free zone for a long time, where realistic assessments were discouraged in favor of mystification. This has not been overcome even today.

An example is given of news reports on N24 and N-TV on March 1, 2003, about a "gigantic UFO" over Peru. A military source allegedly stated the phenomenon was "not of earthly origin." However, the reports and footage were quickly removed, and no further press coverage or international reports emerged, leaving the information value at zero.

The Nature of UFO Belief

The report posits that UFOs are not necessarily about objective evidence but rather about the psychological need to believe and the construction of a personal reality. The author notes that UFO believers are not necessarily unintelligent but are drawn to things for which there is no objective proof. This belief is often fueled by a desire for "creativity" and the exploration of exotic phenomena.

This tendency is linked to individual disposition, with younger people being more involved than older ones. This is explained through confirmation biases and the avoidance of cognitive dissonance, where individuals actively seek information that confirms their existing beliefs and ignore or critically assess contradictory information. This social component is also evident in UFO events, which often rehash old information without offering new insights.

UFOs as Symbols and Cultural Phenomena

The report discusses UFOs as symbols, derived from the Greek word "symbolon," meaning "put together," signifying the joining of two worlds. A symbol is not just representative but points to something beyond its immediate meaning, often touching upon unconscious areas. Thus, flying saucers have a mythical, metaphorical, and allegorical dimension.

UFO enthusiasts are compared to fans of science fiction films, sharing a love for "flying saucers" and their associated narratives. The report criticizes the tendency for UFO fans to resist acknowledging that their interest is similar to that of film fans, struggling to integrate their "exceptional interest" into social environments. The report suggests that UFOlogy, with its many voices and variations, has become a complex system that is difficult to resolve.

The Influence of Media and "Infotainment"

The report highlights the shift in media from information dissemination to entertainment, a trend exemplified by "infotainment" and "docutainment." This has led to "UFOtainment" and "UFO-Entertainers." The author explicitly states their intention is not to entertain but to convey information, which can sometimes lead to confusion or anxiety in the audience.

The report criticizes the "movement" of UFOlogy for its lack of progress over decades, attributing this to a focus on "event collection" rather than genuine research into the truthfulness of reports. The author quotes Gerd W. Höchsmann, who states that as long as UFO research operates this way, it cannot be taken seriously.

Walter-Jörg Langbein admits that his field lacks concrete evidence of extraterrestrial artifacts, despite identifying as a Roswell believer. He suggests that his faith in the miraculous, which his church does not fully support, is compensated by "technical rationalization." The report mentions Josef F. Blumrich's work on the Ezechiel text as an example of a "masterpiece" for the Paleo-SETI hypothesis, though ultimately deemed "hot air."

The "Dreamgate" to Another World

The report suggests that for some UFO fans, the phenomenon serves as a "dreamgate" to another, perhaps better, world, akin to a "land of milk and honey." Genuine research is hindered not by external influences but by a lack of interest within the field itself. The example of "flying saucer contactees" from the 1950s is cited, who claimed to have taken tours to paradisiacal planets, only for later space missions to reveal these celestial bodies as inhospitable.

This leads to an "elegant way out": the contactees were not lying, but the beings they encountered were from a different dimension or a higher plane of existence, such as Venus, which is invisible to standard measurement devices. The author implies that this is a way to maintain belief in the face of contradictory evidence.

The Psychology of Belief and Social Influence

The report delves into the psychological aspects of belief, particularly concerning the "magic" that influences the soul and hearts of followers of "Alien Images" in modern mass culture. This magic is seen as a source of power over people, offering a sense of "positive energy" and a way to escape earthly burdens. This transformation is perceived as becoming more "attentive," "aware," and "sensitive," but the report suggests these are merely internalized delusions.

This state of being "in-between" or "on the edge" is described as a "dreamtime." The report references a study by British researchers who found no evidence for ghosts, attributing reported paranormal experiences to environmental factors like drafts, poor lighting, or electromagnetic fields, rather than supernatural phenomena. This study is seen as an example of how psychological and environmental factors can explain experiences often attributed to the supernatural.

The "Dream of Reason" and UFOlogy

The report connects the phenomenon to Goya's "The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters," suggesting that when reason is abandoned, fantasies and monsters emerge. The author emphasizes that UFO/Para-believers are not necessarily unintelligent but are drawn to things without objective proof. This attraction may stem from a desire for "creativity" and the exploration of exotic phenomena.

This inclination is linked to individual disposition and psychological mechanisms like confirmation bias and the avoidance of cognitive dissonance. The report notes that people tend to seek out information that confirms their existing beliefs and ignore contradictory evidence. This social component is also present in UFO events, which often repeat familiar themes and "rehash" old information, yet still attract dedicated fans.

The report criticizes the tendency to interpret paranormal phenomena as "supernatural" rather than considering more mundane explanations. This is seen as part of a broader human tendency to conform to group behavior and information within a group, reinforcing existing beliefs and excluding criticism. The report concludes by stating that information supporting the existence of UFOs is often more accessible than information that refutes it, leading to a greater acceptance of their existence due to the "availability heuristic."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of CENAP-Report are skepticism towards mainstream UFOlogy, the psychological underpinnings of belief in the paranormal, the influence of media and popular culture on shaping perceptions, and the distinction between genuine research and sensationalism. The editorial stance is critical and analytical, aiming to deconstruct the often-unquestioned narratives within the UFO community and to encourage a more rational and evidence-based approach to understanding unexplained phenomena. The report advocates for a critical examination of claims, a recognition of psychological biases, and a clear separation between entertainment and serious investigation.

This issue of CENAP-Report, titled "CENAP-Report Nr. 287," dated December 2003, delves into a critical analysis of media's role in shaping perceptions, particularly concerning UFO phenomena. The report questions the nature of reality and how it is presented and consumed through various media channels, with a strong focus on television.

The 'Flying Saucer' Myth and Blurred Realities

The issue begins by discussing the 'flying saucer' myth as something that challenges the concept of reality. It suggests that these myths remind us of different worlds and realities that humanity has lived with for centuries. The report posits that the 'divine other' is presented in various guises, offering a 'blurred reality' that bridges the 'visible' and the 'hidden,' the 'everyday' and the 'miraculous.' This creates a dual reality, neither fully real nor unreal, existing 'somewhere in between' the 'trauma of a UFO experience,' even if it's only related to Venus. The author expresses dissatisfaction with this perspective, placing it within the realm of surrealism, defining it as a boundary between two realities: the everyday and the transition to the sacred, the material and the imaginary. This is likened to a 'rite of passage' or an 'initiation.'

The report criticizes the tendency for UFO enthusiasts to find fantastic events in this, seeing 'reality elements' through a reinterpretation that makes poetic leaps easier. It references Jenny Randles' 'Oz-factor,' a concept where the distant and the real have a reciprocal relationship, creating a connection that seems both fundamentally different and closely linked.

"Mental Darkness" and the "Oz-Factor"

This phenomenon is described as a form of 'mental darkness.' Particularly in the context of 'abductions,' a world of immense moments and abysses is presented. Representatives of ufology, after intensive analysis, often declare these events as 'clearly of superior technology.' The origin of these 'manifestations' is debated, whether they are from extraterrestrials, time travelers from the future, or projections from parallel universes interacting with our world. Regardless, the emphasis is on the 'supernatural' as an alternative and provocative worldview promising adventure and attention.

The report suggests that individuals experiencing these phenomena might feel they have glimpsed the edge of reality, as defined by surrealists. They may find it difficult to return to the mechanistic world of Newton, which is perceived as lacking depth, beauty, meaning, and soul. This leads to the feeling that two different 'realities' have collided. The report questions whether this is merely a rhetorical device or an ironic moment in the UFO epic, used to portray superstition and 'visions' as 'alternative worldviews.' It suggests this is a way to 'trivialise' by presenting countless intermediate dimensions lying seamlessly next to each other. This is seen as a 'prison of the mind,' as ufology often avoids scientific approaches, and anyone who critically engages with the topic is condemned.

Science vs. Belief and the "UFO Kindergarten"

The report criticizes the tendency to keep science separate from belief, or the attitude of 'I see something you don't see.' 'Science' is only celebrated when it aligns with a particular UFOlogy perspective, without critical examination of what is being presented. The example of MUFON-CES is mentioned, which is seen as having high aspirations but also weaknesses that are not recognized due to arrogance. This chain of thought is traced back to ancient beliefs about spirits and other beings, leading to the creation of personified concepts derived from an inner universe of psyche and its cosmic relationship, akin to classical theology.

The author describes the UFO field as a 'ufological kindergarten,' citing an incident in March 2003 when Roland Gehardt was approached by a representative from the Alien.De website. This individual, who had been running a 'UFO abduction questionnaire' for victims, asked if CENAP could investigate cases, as they themselves lacked the knowledge and professional capacity to do so. The author finds this situation more sad than laughable.

Media Criticism: The Medium "UFO" - American UFO TV

This section focuses on media criticism, specifically American UFO TV, with a segment titled "An Evening with ET" (Entertainment Tonight). A quote from Sherlock Holmes is presented: "It is a capital mistake to theorize before you have all the evidence. Insensibly, one begins to twist the facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. It biases the judgment."

The article warns that this section goes beyond the headline and is not for the 'faint-hearted' or the naive in ufology.

The Illusion of Reality in Media

The possibility of illusion is pervasive in TV consumption, stemming from presentation formats, image selection, and our knowledge of their manipulability. Our understanding of the world is largely based on media-provided information. TV productions use established forms to present events, with selection criteria driven by tension and exceptionalism for 'prime-time' coverage. News is staged, with news channels constantly seeking new, unusual, and sensational images to stand out from competitors. Visual material, especially film clips, can elevate certain events to broadcast status. The authenticity of images is generally considered doubtful due to modern image processing capabilities. Furthermore, even with unedited footage, the message is not necessarily equivalent to the truth.

The Role of Perspective and Editing

The perspective and editing of sound and image material can influence a report's content, with images and contributions being taken out of their original context. Images provide only a partial view of events, acting as a form of selection that clarifies and simplifies the narrative. News and reporting are often equated with information, and the audience expects to be informed, to learn something new. This presupposes a knowledge gap between the informant (medium) and the information recipient (audience).

Criteria for Newsworthiness and Media Systems

The criteria for selecting what is newsworthy are primarily novelty and extraordinariness, rather than the everyday. This novelty includes the timeliness of the first report and the exceptional attraction of the topic. Journalists are also prone to spreading sensational stories. The news value corresponds to factors like the unexpected, the dramatic, and the irregular. This builds a social expectation system. Importantly, media and viewers belong to the same social system, sharing values and norms. Media selection operates on an 'observer' principle, taking an external perspective while belonging to the same system.

Objectivity in Reporting

Objectivity is a normal principle of reporting, born from a distrust in humanity's ability to perceive the world. It was an attempt to stabilize the relationship with a world that feels out of control. The demand for objectivity in reporting serves as an ethical principle and a guideline for journalistic practice. The goal is for readers and viewers not to be patronized but to form their own opinions based on complete and unadulterated facts. However, the pursuit of ratings often leads to media distortions. Journalism textbooks state that objective reporting requires correct facts, thorough research, and acknowledgment of uncertainty when accuracy cannot be proven. Information should be complete, balanced, and free of commentary, judgment, and tendentious statements. The reality in this field, however, is different, especially when the topic is used as a 'medium UFO.' 'Outer objectivity' is difficult to grasp and does not always mean full objectivity.

The Reporter's Subjective Experience

The reporter weaves their observations and arguments with feelings and associations, resulting in a construction of reality mediated by their subjective experience. Reportage is always a self-experience that defies objectification. Its informational value lies in the presentation of the topic. The assessment of news and reports depends on knowledge of different interpretations of the facts and the establishment of an adequate, generally accepted reality.

The "Media Effect" and Constructed Realities

This is referred to as the "media effect," which occurs when figures and materials are used to produce specific opinions. Television, in particular, occupies a significant space in our lives and has the 'power to bring about changes in social evolution' through the visualization of its content. The biography of a society is intertwined with its media; every high culture defines itself through its 'media.' Media foster symbolic environments that influence people, creating 'communication' on any given topic through their presented 'images.' This is likened to an "X-Files effect" or phenomenon, which predates the popular conspiracy series and built interest in extraterrestrial UFO sightings, constructing a new 'world of meaning' for fans.

The Shift from Text to Image

The report notes that the average person on the street may find this a foreign concept in modern civilization. The tension between a sense of connection and questionable democratic understanding is highlighted. Television and media information in 2003 are vastly different from 1980. The older generation struggles with this new media world, similar to how some perceive the current SPD differs from the Willy Brandt era. Global economic changes have synchronized the world's understanding of its present through mass media. The report points out that while students may be learning more than ever, they lag behind internationally, with subjects like 'etiquette' being taught in schools, which should ideally be learned at home. This indicates a fundamental issue, where false realities with superficial 'glitter effects' are presented to millions, overshadowing in-depth analysis.

The written word, as a communication medium, allows for detailed, reflective, critical, and long-term analysis. In contrast, modern media prioritize the immediate image and the reactions it triggers, leading to the gradual disempowerment of reason by emotion. Even when reacting instinctively, one should not forget to use their brain. Television attempts to convey 'information' in a relaxed, communicative manner. It is a fundamental prerequisite for public awareness and knowledge of supposed connections or facts necessary for society's social system. The transmission of events occurs in an interpersonal sphere without boundaries.

The Problem of Selection and "Realitätsnachweis"

This understanding is crucial when engaging with the topic. The problem is that success and selection pressure go hand in hand, without limits. Consequently, the 'proof of reality' is often disregarded, though not openly admitted. The media system offers a pseudo-escape and pseudo-excuse: "The representation of reality cannot be fully captured in images." This leads to extreme simplifications and misunderstandings. While this might be acceptable for short, 2.5-minute segments, it is not for nearly hour-long documentaries, which present a distinct reality. This is not about diligence; instead, stories are crafted to suit the audience's taste, neglecting research to construct a new reality that the target audience desires. It is described as clever when viewers are misled, and the concepts of 'truth' and 'objectivity' in reporting are reduced to mere buzzwords.

CENAP's Media Discussion and the "Target Group"

CENAP internally held a media discussion in August 2003 regarding the ongoing media speculation about the release of Sahara hostages, even though little was clear at the time. This was compared to the UFO phenomenon, which has been speculated about for years. Lawyer Jens Lorek commented that the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that electronic media are not interested in exhaustive reporting of a legal case but rather in extracting 'highlights' for short segments. He stated that to be present in the media, one must participate in this game, serving quickly prepared 'baked egg cakes' because slow-cooked ones are not desired.

Norbert Eßer, an advertising agency operator, noted that regardless of how provocative or simple a topic is, someone will always talk or write about it. He described this as the world of media, where curiosity, a desire to know better, and to act on that knowledge are common. He explained that his profession involves deliberately triggering a chain reaction to market products, and that news and new information behave like conventional products.

Jörg Böhme added that the fault lies not only with the media but also with the people who 'consume' them. He attributed this to a pure 'sensationalism' – the desire to be the first to have the latest news, regardless of its accuracy. Media sell news based on speed, not quality, to avoid missing out, even if there is nothing to miss. The fastest seller makes the most, even if the 'news' is fleeting and will be forgotten tomorrow. As with everything, money rules the world.

UFOs on TV: A Media Effect

The report discusses UFOs on TV and the resulting 'media effect.' It posits that social determinants influence the passive viewer, who nonetheless brings their own experiences and attitudes to media reception. Media culture has become the dominant form of culture, and media messages contribute to 'identity formation' and 'socialization.' The business model relies on these 'dependents.' Television, as 'media culture,' has become dominant. For example, new 'superstars' are sought among amateurs, while the reality of the working world is less of a 'paradise,' with more 'losers' (social welfare recipients) than 'superstars' from a similarly (media) invented new middle class. Behavior is shaped, and 'identity formation' occurs.

Commercial Interests and Ideological Structures

TV content is not accidental; it is commercially optimized, including the pseudo-friendly and pseudo-factual presentation of moderators. The ideological structure of this content includes contradictions, ambivalences, and other forms of vague ambiguity, especially for those not truly informed. This is particularly relevant to the UFO topic. The 'image' is drawn from countless newspaper articles, TV reports, and fan press, creating a mix of the spectacle and the role of an unrecognized 'commercial.' This 'tool' of the fan culture serves its own interests and intentions. Fabrications round out the package, as the popularity of a 'text' lies in its rapid circulation in oral culture without 'unaesthetic' aversion from the masses. This is clearly a constructive effort by the people behind the production, who are ultimately interested in economic success. They sell themselves and their media offerings to a mass audience, catering to their taste. This results in 'social ideologies, values, and representations' that are perhaps more successful today than those of Marx, Lenin, Hitler, or Mao, who aimed to 'change the world' with their books. However, only in rare ideal cases does this lead to critical thinking and action among the masses.

Differentiating the 'Product' of Research

For the discerning researcher, the 'product' is complex and requires differentiation. The 'average person' logically fails to do this and quickly succumbs to the superficiality of 'media culture.' The appropriation of film content, for instance, depends on the viewer's pre-existing background. In the context of ufology, the background in the USA is seen as clearly heading in the wrong direction. The phrase "Born in the USA" takes on a special meaning in this environment. The criteria for judging a report's objectivity depend on the undisputed nature of the transmitted content. Society's consensus-based reality formats are paramount, with their criteria established and recognized through global conventions. For such subjects, reality criteria have been developed to classify a report as true or false.

Reality or objectivity can thus lie much deeper, as an 'inner objectivity' that spreads across different dimensions. Objectivity is subject to subjective judgment and is mostly a matter of perspective and interpretation.

"Out of the Blue" and UFO Entertainment

On June 24, 2003, the documentary "Out of the Blue" was aired. While technically well-made, it is described as UFOlogy-friendly, aligning with the ufological meaning construction of this particular cultural product from across the pond. This makes it easy to appropriate the content of such broadcasts. This continues on the information horizon of reality or as information on the horizon of reality. It is pure UFO entertainment, which SPIEGEL termed 'UFOtainment' in the 90s, following the so-called 'Santilli Alien Autopsy Film.' The Sci-Fi slogan "a definitive investigation of the UFO phenomenon" for this broadcast is simply a...

This issue of CENAP-Report Nr. 287, dated December 2003, delves into the intersection of the UFO phenomenon, popular culture, and media. The central theme revolves around the documentary "Out of the Blue" and its role within the broader landscape of "investigative journalism" and entertainment.

Analysis of "Out of the Blue"

The report critiques "Out of the Blue" as a product of the entertainment industry, designed to provide amusement rather than critical examination. It argues that the film, narrated by Peter Coyote and featuring filmmakers like James Fox, Tim Coleman, and Boris Zubov, presents a multi-accentual collage of opinions that often contradict each other. However, the film's intention is to entertain, deliberately excluding critical or skeptical perspectives. The report suggests that this approach is a deliberate distraction, aiming to tie into pre-existing genre-specific presentations.

The film is described as a playground for the struggle over meanings within popular culture and fandom. It posits that the "aliens are here" narrative has become a social factor, with the documentary simply translating tabloid sensationalism into a television piece. The report notes that in the "American way," the UFO phenomenon is predominantly depicted through the lens of "extraterrestrials" and "flying saucers," viewing this as a modern art form.

The Role of Popular Culture and Media

The articles explore how modern culture and belief systems, particularly those propagated by commercial mass media, converge. It is argued that popular mass culture is not merely consumed but actively produced by people, with UFOs and extraterrestrial life (ETs) being prominent themes within the "culture industry." The report posits that the interest in UFOs is sustained by a receptive audience that has been "vaccinated" by mass media, creating a demand for such content.

The concept of a "world-as-a-text" has been replaced by a "world-as-a-picture," leading to a society of the "spectacle" where images shape our understanding and ideals. The report expresses concern that television soap operas are shaping mental worlds and cultivating new potentials, but for many, this is merely the beginning of entertainment, while for others, it becomes dangerous to the "free spirit."

Media as a Producer of Reality

The report emphasizes that media no longer merely represent reality but actively influence and produce it. The "half-truth" presented by media excludes significant counter-information. While media creators produce content based on perceived "public interest," this interest itself can be a form of deception. The distinction between a real event and its media representation becomes blurred, with content becoming a product of media technology focused on ratings and circulation.

Commercial interests, rather than scientific or journalistic ethics, drive media production. The report criticizes the notion of staying "on the surface for general understanding," as media events create their own reality. "Simulations" are presented as hyperreality, a concept that is ultimately implosive. This is concealed from the public for economic reasons.

Specific Cases and Critiques

The issue highlights several specific cases and media portrayals:

• "Out of the Blue": Described as "UFOtainment" pure, aimed at marketing and preserving the "monuments" of the American UFO narrative. It's seen as a product of the infotainment industry, catering to a desire for magical explanations.
• "UFOs: Und es gibt sie doch" (ARD Reportage, 1994): This German television report is cited as an example of sensationalism, attempting to "top" commercial TV.
• "Colonel" Corso's claims: Based on the American Roswell pop culture, these claims are presented as part of the "new image" of American independence day.
• Roland Emmerich's film: The blockbuster film is seen as capitalizing on American postmodern cultural ideas.
• Beverly Fox: Mentioned as a former MUFON State Director for New Mexico, whose views on UFOs being demonic are noted.
• Dr. Donald Burleson: His statement about needing to live in Roswell to be interested in UFOs is questioned as unscientific.
• Photographic 'evidence': Several photographic cases are analyzed, including the 1966 Zanesville saucer photo, the 1954 Edwards AFB incident, and the 1969 Calgary saucer photos. The report suggests many of these are hoaxes or misinterpretations, with "experts" often relying on flawed analysis.
• The "Phönix-UFO" and "Bodensee-Objekt": These cases are presented as examples where alleged unique sightings are later shown to be similar to other, potentially fabricated, events.

The Nature of Belief and Skepticism

The report questions whether the modern, supposedly rational person desires enchantment and mystery because they cannot bear the idea that everything is explainable. It suggests that people are becoming dumber or are seeking irrational ideas that are presented with distractions to lead them away from rational thought. The emotional power of iconic images is highlighted, and the report posits that many UFO enthusiasts are content with fantastic stories about "spacemen" rather than seeking factual truth.

It is argued that the UFO phenomenon, much like religious figures such as Jesus Christ or Buddha, relies on the "verbalization" of emotional experiences rather than objective reporting of physical reality. The "culture" pre-existing these narratives fulfills the desire for specific patterns, making critical tones disruptive.

The "Culture Industry" and Postmodernism

The issue delves into the concept of the "culture industry" and the industrialization of mass culture, suggesting that it ultimately serves commercialization. The report criticizes the tendency to dismiss critical voices within UFOlogy, mirroring a pattern seen in the broader media landscape.

The report concludes by emphasizing that many pro-UFO statements are incomplete, misleading, or outright false. This creates a deceptive perception for those who are unaware of the underlying issues, driven by commercial interests. The report advocates for a more critical approach to media consumption and the "UFO truth."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the pervasive influence of popular culture and mass media on the perception of the UFO phenomenon, the critique of sensationalism and commercialization within "UFOlogy," and the importance of critical thinking and skepticism. The editorial stance is clearly critical of how UFOs are presented in popular media, viewing it as a form of entertainment and manipulation rather than genuine scientific inquiry. The report advocates for a more discerning approach from both media producers and consumers.

This issue of CENAP-Report Nr. 287, dated December 2003, is a critical analysis of UFO documentaries and media portrayals of the phenomenon. The report, written in German, delves into various cases and media productions, questioning their accuracy, methodology, and underlying agendas.

Roswell Incident Analysis

The report begins by dissecting the Roswell incident, suggesting that the 'UFO debris' was known to MUFON officials as early as June 1947, but reported later. It criticizes the UFOlogy field for presenting a 'perfect' narrative by ignoring inconvenient facts and accuses them of having 'no idea' or deliberately appearing ignorant. The author posits that the UFO story is characterized by fabricated images and distorted truths, serving as 'brainwashing' for the public. Several web links are provided for further investigation into Roswell sources, including those from CSICOP, which often presents a skeptical viewpoint.

Jimmy Carter Sighting

The report revisits the UFO sighting by Jimmy Carter, noting that the investigation lacked depth. While the official explanation was 'Venus', the report clarifies this was not an official government statement. It credits Robert Sheaffer with a thorough debunking of this case.

Gordon Cooper Case

The case of astronaut Gordon Cooper is also examined. Cooper claimed to have witnessed a cameraman filming a 'flying saucer' with landing gear at Edwards Air Force Base in 1957. The report suggests that the film was classified and disappeared into the Pentagon. However, it questions Cooper's memory and clarity, noting that he was not a direct witness to the filming itself. The report mentions that images from this alleged film were used in the Condon Report, questioning the secrecy. It contrasts Cooper's account with that of the cameramen, Bittick and Getty, who described a round object without landing gear that simply passed overhead.

Media Influence and 'UFOtainment'

The report strongly criticizes the media's role in shaping the UFO narrative, particularly through productions like the Sci-Fi Channel's "Out of the Blue." It argues that such programs avoid genuine verification and critical inquiry, contributing to a 'UFO pop culture.' The author contends that a vast majority of reported UFO sightings are not genuine, regardless of the witness. The report suggests that media outlets prioritize ratings and advertising revenue, fulfilling the 'dogmas' of the entertainment industry and catering to a leisure-oriented audience.

The 'Out of the Blue' Documentary

The documentary "Out of the Blue" is presented as a prime example of this media manipulation. The report criticizes its lack of critical analysis and its reliance on sensationalism. It argues that the documentary, like many others, avoids fundamental checks and balances, contributing to a 'UFOtainment' industry that profits from public fascination. The report links the rise of this industry to Steven Spielberg's "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," which made UFOs a global 'pop icon.'

The 'Cover-Up' Narrative

The report discusses the pervasive 'cover-up' narrative in UFOlogy, suggesting it's a tactic used by UFO enthusiasts to deflect from the lack of concrete evidence for their extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH). It argues that UFOlogy has not progressed significantly in decades because it fails to address its own biases and problems.

Specific Case Analyses

Phoenix Lights

The "Phoenix Lights" incident in Arizona is compared to the Greifswald lights from 1990. The report notes that while videos of V-shaped objects were shown, witness testimonies were used to create confusion. It suggests a psychological 'alienation potential' at play, where objective truth contradicts subjective accounts.

Trent Photographs

Photographs taken by Mr. Trent in 1950 of a 'flying saucer' are discussed. The report mentions William Hartmann's initial assessment of 'half/half' for genuine/hoax, but notes that Hartmann later deemed it a hoax, a detail allegedly omitted from the documentary.

Trans en Provence and Rendlesham Incidents

The French case of Trans en Provence and the Rendlesham incident from 1980 are presented as examples of uncritically accepted UFO cases, despite significant counter-arguments and reactions available online.

Soviet UFO Stories

The report touches upon Soviet UFO stories, suggesting they are often related to secret space programs and Russian rocket experiments, providing links for further research.

"Unheimliche Begegnung..." and "Akte X"

The report links the popularization of UFOs to Steven Spielberg's film "Unheimliche Begegnung..." and the TV series "Akte X" (The X-Files), noting how these fictional narratives have blurred the lines between reality and entertainment, creating a 'postmodern collage' of popular culture.

Dexter/Hillsdale Sightings

Historical footage of the Dexter/Hillsdale, Michigan sightings (the 'swamp gas affair') is presented, but the report criticizes the way it's edited and linked to unrelated cases. It mentions Dr. Hynek's investigation and a photo of him with a sign saying "Welcome UFO People."

Condon Committee and 'Trick'

The report analyzes the Condon Committee's investigation, suggesting that the term 'trick' in a memo was used to mean 'knack' or 'method' rather than deception. It argues that the committee was formed due to a political scandal surrounding the Michigan sightings, not necessarily due to the 'unheimlich' nature of the phenomena themselves. The report criticizes the tendency in UFOlogy to label skeptics as incompetent while portraying pro-UFO researchers as objective and factual.

COMETA Group Report

The 1999 COMETA Group report from France is dismissed as not being a genuine research effort but rather a review of existing UFO literature. The report claims COMETA did not conduct any actual case research but rather evaluated UFO representations from literature, leading to conclusions that are easily reached by any tabloid reader.

Brazilian School Ship 'Almirante Saldanha' Case

A case involving trick-filmed by a photographer aboard the Brazilian school ship 'Almirante Saldanha' in 1958 is presented as an example of imitation and misrepresentation within the UFO field.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of CENAP-Report revolve around the critical examination of UFO phenomena as presented in media and documentaries. The editorial stance is highly skeptical, emphasizing the lack of objective evidence, the prevalence of sensationalism, and the manipulative tactics employed by both UFOlogists and media producers. The report consistently argues that many UFO cases are either misidentifications, hoaxes, or products of psychological phenomena, often amplified by a desire for 'UFOtainment' and the perpetuation of 'cover-up' narratives. The author stresses the importance of critical thinking and rigorous investigation, contrasting it with the often uncritical acceptance of claims within the UFO community and the entertainment industry. The report suggests that the UFO phenomenon, while complex, is often unnecessarily complicated by those with vested interests, leading to a distorted perception of reality.

This issue of CENAP-Report, dated December 2003, delves into the phenomenon of crop circles, critically analyzing their origins, media coverage, and the surrounding UFOlogy discourse. The report questions the tendency to attribute these formations to extraterrestrial intelligence, instead exploring human involvement, media manipulation, and the nature of belief systems.

The Social and Media Landscape

The issue begins by discussing how modern media, particularly the internet, can lead to the formation of new social relationships among those feeling powerless. It highlights the 'AKTE X' fan culture and UFO forums as examples of 'knowledge accumulation' where ignorance is cultivated to protect the 'cult' of belief. The report argues that conspiracy theories offer an alternative view of reality and power structures, existing as a 'hyperreal' discourse that is material in its presence and use. It suggests that understanding the underlying conditions is crucial to approaching 'UFOlogy'.

Critique of UFOlogy and Media Coverage

The report criticizes prominent figures in UFOlogy, such as Richard M. Dolan, for lamenting media 'mind control' and the downplaying of UFOs. It points out the irony that Dolan's own views are mirrored in media productions like 'Out of the Blue,' suggesting that these are part of a larger chain of mass manipulation through television. Dolan's assertion that American media handles the issue of unexplained aerial objects poorly is challenged, with the report arguing that the US is actually quite pro-UFO in its media landscape, despite occasional skeptical voices.

The Nature of Truth and Perception

Drawing a parallel to the mystical visions of Teresa of Avila, the report suggests that understanding UFO phenomena requires looking beyond literal, physical eyes to a broader cultural iconography. It posits that the popular culture surrounding UFOs, exemplified by 'Akte X,' has created a 'public image' or 'iconography' that influences perception. The report cautions against accepting all 'truth certificates' from media, noting that even fictional works like 'Akte X' have explored how differing perceptions of reality can be presented.

Pseudo-Rätsel Kornkreise (Pseudo-Riddle Crop Circles)

Zeichen im Acker 2003 (Signs in the Field 2003)

This section focuses on crop circles, noting a ZDF Discovery series episode on the topic. It acknowledges the artistic perfection and geometric complexity of these formations, which have defied scientific explanation, leading to speculation involving mystics, esoterics, and UFOlogists. However, the report emphasizes that human 'field artists' can create elaborate signs using simple means, blurring the lines between art and science.

The 'Chosen One' and the Kornkreis Glosse

The article humorously describes a farmer, Larry Balestra, whose wheat field was marked by crop circles, estimating his loss at $500. Balestra is annoyed by the 'pilgrims' visiting his field and the local perception of him as the 'chosen one.' The report draws parallels between this 'chosen one' narrative and characters like Frodo Baggins, Harry Potter, and Neo from 'The Matrix,' who often resist their destined roles. The 'Kornkreis-Glosse' section satirizes the idea of aliens creating crop circles, suggesting it's a mundane occurrence with earthly consequences for farmers.

Human Creation and Media Influence

Several instances are detailed where crop circles were revealed to be human-made. Teenagers in California confessed to creating them out of boredom. A report from the German magazine 'Menshealth' provided instructions on how to make crop circles using simple tools like stilts and a plank. The influence of Mel Gibson's film 'Signs' and a Sci-Fi Channel documentary is highlighted as a significant factor in the public's fascination and belief in extraterrestrial origins.

Specific Cases and Investigations

The report details investigations into crop circles in various locations:

• Rügen, Germany: Researchers from Invisiblecircle, Wolfgang Schindler and Jan Schwochow, found human footprints near a circle in Rambin, confirming it was man-made. The suspected creator, who claimed to have made over a hundred circles, was reportedly caught in the act but escaped.
• Geestgottberg, Germany: A crop circle in a barley field was described as a 'successful artwork' resembling a panda bear, with speculation about its origin, though the farmer attributed it to agricultural machinery.
• Herznach, Switzerland: A farmer believed a crop circle was the work of two people using a wooden beam, dismissing extraterrestrial theories.
• California, USA: Teenagers confessed to creating crop circles as a prank.
• Sinsheim, Germany: A farmer, Roland Gehardt, reported crop circles appearing annually, with one farmer even using a 'crop circle defense weapon' and planting sugar beets.

The 'Kornkreis-Thema' as an Export

The report notes that the 'Kornkreis-Thema' has become a successful export, particularly to the United States, following the success of the film 'Signs' and a TV documentary. It suggests that the public's aesthetic and romantic appreciation of these formations makes it difficult for them to accept that they are the work of artists.

Scientific and Pseudoscientific Explanations

The report touches upon various explanations, including electromagnetic vortices, but ultimately leans towards human creation. It contrasts scientific inquiry with pseudoscientific interpretations often found in UFOlogy.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO phenomena, the role of media in shaping public perception, the psychology of belief and conspiracy theories, and the debunking of extraterrestrial explanations for crop circles. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical of UFOlogy's more sensationalist claims, emphasizing rational explanations and human agency. The report advocates for a critical approach to information, particularly that disseminated through media channels, and highlights the human element behind many phenomena once attributed to the unknown.

This issue of CENAP-Report, dated December 2003, focuses heavily on the phenomenon of crop circles, particularly in Germany. It presents a multifaceted view, including reports from researchers, eyewitness accounts, skeptical analyses, and media coverage.

Kornkreise in Belitz: A Research Focus

The lead article details the investigation of a crop circle in a wheat field near Belitz, Germany. Frank Peters, secretary of the Kornkreise Research Society e.V., planned to visit the site. He explains that the society relies on local members for initial investigations when direct visits are not possible. Peters became a crop circle researcher in the mid-1990s after encountering phenomena in England. He is particularly interested in associated 'fringe phenomena,' such as reports of orbs and unusual auditory or thermal experiences within crop circles. He mentions a case in Gotha where water sounds were heard within a circle during a dry period and temperature differences were noted in Witzenhausen. Peters also planned to visit another formation near Wittenberge.

The article also notes that the Belitz crop circles had become a 'pilgrimage site,' attracting many curious visitors after aerial photos were published. Farmer Jann Tillmann Bongardt expressed that the formations were so precise they couldn't have been made by humans. He was considering how to harvest the crop while preserving the circle's contours.

Mysterious Circle in Tarmstedt: A Pilot's Discovery

Another report describes a pilot, Carmen Süssenguth, who discovered a mysterious circle and geometric patterns in a rye field near Tarmstedt. While she captured images, her husband, farmer Hermann Detjen, suggested a more mundane explanation: the field had been sown with rye in autumn, but due to excessive wetness, it didn't grow well. In spring, barley was sown on the same spot, leaving the unusual traces. This explanation suggests a non-paranormal origin.

Religion and Crop Circles: An Interpretation

Otto Streckeisen's article explores the connection between crop circles and religion. He views crop circles as phenomena that challenge our understanding and broaden our worldview, suggesting that even theology might need to adapt. He notes that physicists are increasingly involved in exploring these phenomena. Streckeisen criticizes media attempts to trivialize crop circles, seeing it as a defense mechanism against the incomprehensible. He finds beauty and geometric precision in the formations, suggesting an unknown intelligence. He also mentions reports of strange disturbances to technical equipment near crop circles and physiological effects on people within them.

Streckeisen also notes two recurring observations: sightings of lights during the formation of pictograms and the frequent appearance of crop circles near ancient cult sites or burial grounds, suggesting these locations are 'impregnated with the past.' He believes crop circles help expand our worldview, allowing us to perceive God's world as larger than our senses perceive. He contrasts this with a fundamentalist view that dismisses the unexplained as demonic.

Reactions and Skepticism

The article by Streckeisen generated several comments. Jörg Böhme criticized the tendency to mutate into believers through half-knowledge and unproven claims. Another commenter from the GWUP forum sarcastically suggested that the less one understands, the further one progresses in 'knowledge,' finding amusement in the explanations. A member of the GWUP forum list also commented, suggesting that the author, Werner, was a 'simple Christian' who might earn a place in heaven.

A Catholic Perspective on Crop Circles

A subsequent commentary, attributed to 'WW,' places Streckeisen's article in the 'RELIGION' column, noting a Catholic perspective. The commentator suggests that while Catholic faith accepts 'miracles,' questioning their origin is necessary in an 'enlightened age.' The commentary criticizes Streckeisen for not delving deeper, suggesting that a 'will to believe' hinders a fuller understanding. It reiterates that crop circles expand the 'worldview' on a spiritual level and questions if Streckeisen is a member of the Kornkreis-Förderverein FGK, implying that such organizations resist rational explanations.

Vienenburg 'Pacman' Crop Circle Investigation

A report from Vienenburg describes a crop circle resembling a 'Pacman' figure, a common element from early computer games. While some dismiss it as a prank, others see it as a phenomenon not easily explained by conventional methods. A field investigation included Henning Warnebold, Michael Rost (a natural scientist), and a member of the Forschungsgesellschaft Kornkreise e.V. Rost requested discretion due to his upcoming doctorate. He has been researching crop circles for ten years, aiming for a scientific approach. Rost and Warnebold believe the large formation might not be human-made. They cite reports of increased unidentified lights in the Harz region and Warnebold's sensation of increased earth radiation at the center of the figure, which he attempted to demonstrate with a dowsing rod.

The Vienenburg police, represented by Waldemar Sottke, viewed the incident as property damage and a simple trick that could be replicated with a rope and roller. The police intended to focus on terrestrial investigations.

TV Team Investigates Vienenburg Crop Circles

A TV crew from RTL, led by editor Markus Dietz, investigated the Vienenburg crop circles for their program 'Guten Abend RTL.' The report aimed to determine if the formations were the work of 'hobby crop knockers' or aliens. Rentner Rolf Köcher and dowsing practitioner Irmintrud Erika Dilcher from Kassel tried to convince the TV team of the extraterrestrial hypothesis. Köcher introduced Dilcher as someone with 'special powers.'

Dilcher used dowsing rods to detect energies, claiming the 'cosmos is real' and that the formations were of cosmic origin. The TV team departed after about 15 minutes.

Crop Circles in Kraichgau: Still a Mystery

In the Kraichgau region near Sinsheim, farmers are reportedly less surprised by the regular appearance of crop circles. Farmer Jürgen Bentz expressed relief that the field had been harvested, as visitors had been constantly 'tramping' through it. A large pictograph appeared near the Autobahn 6, described as the second of its kind in Baden-Württemberg that year, with over 30 documented crop circles nationwide since May. Bentz did not believe in extraterrestrials but acknowledged the formations were well-made, though he had no explanation. He lamented that no insurance would cover the estimated 200 Euro damage, and no perpetrators were expected to be found. The formations, some over seventy meters long, left no traces despite damp ground.

Frank Peters of the German Crop Circle Research Society (FGK) stated that while hoaxes exist, most formations cannot be explained. He noted that in 'genuine' pictograms, the stalks are not bent or broken, and grains are not removed. He mentioned that the FGK, with 125 members, has been observing and analyzing this phenomenon for twelve years, documenting over 10,000 formations worldwide. Peters believes that while some 'fun-loving individuals' create crop circles, many are too complex to be human-made.

Scientific and Ministerial Indifference

Despite investigations by scientists from the Max-Planck-Institut, their findings have not been published. The Stuttgart Ministry of Agriculture stated that crop circles are 'not a topic for them.'

Media Coverage and Skeptical Counterpoints

An upcoming Pro7 'Galileo' program was mentioned, which was intended to feature a discussion on crop circles, including a 'crop circle maker' and an 'expert.' However, the segment was unexpectedly replaced. The report also mentions a journalist from Associated Press (AP) who contacted the author for an interview regarding crop circles.

Kornkreis-TÜV: Evaluating Authenticity

Rolf Köcher, a retired farmer, aims to expose hoaxes through his 'Kornkreisbewertungsstelle' (Crop Circle Evaluation Center). He believes genuine crop circles originate from 'cosmic creative energy' and are not man-made. He has investigated about 30 crop circles and developed criteria to distinguish between genuine and fake ones, offering on-site assessments. He emphasizes that genuine circles often have complex geometric structures, with stalks that are not broken or bent, and sometimes show dead insects.

Werner Walter of the Society for Scientific Investigation of the Paranormal (GWUP) is skeptical, stating that crop circles are 'relatively easy to create' using simple tools like a rope and roller. Irmintrud Erika Dilcher, however, maintains that crop circle creation involves magnetic forces or plasma balls controlled by an 'extraterrestrial intelligence,' and she uses dowsing rods to differentiate between genuine and fake circles, estimating that 35% are faked. She cites a Vienenburg circle with a Pacman, circles, and a heart as definitively genuine, noting that the stalks within the heart point in different directions, which she believes no human could achieve. She also mentions finding dead flies in crop circles.

Walter notes that crop circles have grown significantly in size since the 1970s and have become more complex. He suggests that 'self-proclaimed landscape architects' create them, similar to graffiti artists, sometimes to 'trick' believers. He compares crop circle believers to those who believe in 'bleeding Madonnas' and notes that while crop circle 'hysteria' peaked in the 1980s, more fakes were exposed in the 1990s, including the confession of Doug Bower and David Chorley.

'Galileo' Broadcast and Further Investigations

The report revisits the 'Galileo' broadcast, confirming it aired on August 12th, featuring a 'duel' between two sides: Rolf Köcher and Irmintrud Erika Dilcher arguing for cosmic origin versus the idea that they are man-made landscape art. Köcher claims 95% of German crop circles are of 'cosmic origin,' representing a transition from the material to the immaterial world. Dilcher uses her dowsing rod to detect cosmic energies. The report contrasts this with Harald Hoos, who claims to create 'UFO landing sites' or 'cosmic energy impact zones' in fields, documenting his work for 'Galileo.' The report notes a trend among crop circle makers to omit tractor tracks.

New Model UFO

A brief mention is made of a UFO model kit, described as a 'Bausatz mit interessanten Blink- und Leuchteffekten' (kit with interesting flashing and lighting effects), including four aliens and a robot. The UFO model has a diameter of 150 mm and can be assembled with landing gear or a 'beamstrahl' (beam). The description defines a UFO as an 'unidentified flying object' and poses the question of whether UFOs and extraterrestrials exist.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around crop circles, their purported origins (extraterrestrial, natural, or man-made), the research and skepticism surrounding them, and their portrayal in the media. The editorial stance appears to be one of presenting various viewpoints, from the deeply believing to the highly skeptical, while also highlighting the scientific community's general indifference or dismissal of the phenomenon as a serious subject of study. There is a clear emphasis on the ongoing debate and the lack of definitive answers, with a tendency to report on both the mysterious aspects and the debunking efforts.

This issue of CENAP-Report, dated December 2003, delves into various UFO-related topics, including the infamous Roswell incident, the secretive Area 51, and controversial UFO footage allegedly originating from KGB archives. The report critically examines claims made by UFO researchers, particularly Michael Hesemann and Karl K. Korff, questioning the authenticity of presented evidence and highlighting potential manipulation and misrepresentation.

The Roswell Incident and Area 51

The report revisits the Roswell incident, describing it as the most famous and controversial case in UFO history. It recounts the discovery of wreckage made of an unknown metallic foil that could return to its original shape, along with the bodies of supposed aliens. The military's subsequent explanation of the event as a weather balloon and dummy figures is presented, but the report questions why airtight child coffins were ordered for the transport of the dummies. Area 51, also known as 'Dreamland,' is described as a secret US Air Force base in Nevada, established in 1954 and officially acknowledged in 1994. It is stated to be used for atomic tests and the development of new aircraft, with alleged investigations into UFOs and autopsies of extraterrestrials. A claim is made that President Eisenhower allegedly granted permission for extraterrestrials to study humans in exchange for advanced technology.

KGB UFO Footage Controversy

A significant portion of the report focuses on claims made by Michael Hesemann regarding UFO footage obtained from the KGB archives. Hesemann announced in February 2002 that he possessed seven films, allegedly showing UFOs or military installations in former Warsaw Pact countries. The material was purportedly from the grandfather of a young Armenian student named 'T,' who was an ex-KGB officer. Hesemann was reportedly offered seven of the thirteen film clips for $50, with the rest to be provided upon payment of the second installment. The report expresses skepticism about the origin and authenticity of this material, questioning why such sensitive information would be taken by a grandfather and why a young student would possess it. The possibility of computer manipulation is raised, with the report noting that creating such clips is technically feasible and not prohibitively expensive. The report also points out inconsistencies, such as the claim that the material was in PAL format, which would be unusual for former Eastern Bloc countries that primarily used SECAM.

Critiques of UFO Researchers and Evidence

The report critically examines the work of UFO researchers, particularly Michael Hesemann and Karl K. Korff. Hesemann is portrayed as someone who can be easily misled and who uncritically accepts certain claims. The report mentions a statement attributed to Billy Meier's contact, Ptaah, who allegedly called UFO photographer Ed Walters a fraud and his photos fakes. Ptaah also allegedly described Hesemann as easily deceived and mistakenly believing he was in contact with extraterrestrials. Furthermore, Ptaah allegedly labeled Carlos Diaz, another contactee promoted by Hesemann, as a liar and a swindler. Hesemann, in response to criticism, stated that he never claimed to be of extraterrestrial origin and that he considers the Amaury Rivera photos and the Carlos Diaz case authentic, citing the thousands of witnesses as proof against fraud. He also asserted that he conducts extensive field investigations worldwide to find the truth.

The report also discusses the creation of fake UFO footage, citing an experiment by CENAP colleague Reiner Wisser, who created realistic-looking UFO clips using 3D animation software in a short amount of time. Wisser's clips were deemed comparable in quality to those presented by Korff and Hesemann, underscoring the ease with which such material can be fabricated.

Other UFO-Related Topics

The issue also touches upon other UFO-related matters:

• Busch Model UFOs: The company Busch is mentioned for offering UFO models for model railways and dioramas, with suggestions for painting and customizing them.
• "Airship" Photo from 1915: A photograph advertised on eBay as a UFO from 1915 in New York City was identified as an early aircraft, the 'Aeroplane No.1' by Glen Curtiss, highlighting how historical images can be misrepresented to fit the UFO narrative.
• US Army UFO Incident in Austria: An incident is reported where a US Army aircraft, a 'Super King,' allegedly ignored air traffic control signals while flying over Austria, prompting the deployment of Austrian fighter jets. This is presented as the twelfth such incident since September 11.
• Werner L. Forster and Ufo-Nachrichten: Werner L. Forster, editor of the German-language publication 'Ufo-Nachrichten,' is interviewed. He discusses his lifelong fascination with UFOs and his experience witnessing a bright meteor, initially mistaking it for a New Year's rocket.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the skepticism towards sensational UFO claims, the critical examination of evidence presented by researchers, and the potential for hoaxes and manipulation within the UFO community. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious inquiry, questioning official explanations and the credibility of certain UFO proponents while acknowledging the enduring public fascination with the unexplained. The report emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and rigorous investigation when evaluating UFO phenomena and evidence.

Title: CENAP-Report
Issue: Nr. 287
Date: December 2003
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of the CENAP-Report delves into various UFO-related topics, including witness accounts, media analysis, and historical cases. It critically examines how UFO phenomena are reported and interpreted, often highlighting misidentifications and the role of media in shaping public perception.

Article 1: Forster's Perspective on UFOs

The report begins by quoting UFO expert Forster, who dismisses a specific sighting as 'not a UFO' but affirms the existence of flying saucers and extraterrestrial beings. He explains that some phenomena exist on different frequencies, making them invisible to the naked eye. Forster publishes 'UFO-Nachrichten' bi-monthly, featuring translated articles from around the world. He notes that China treats the UFO topic seriously and believes Germany should adopt a similar open-minded approach.

Article 2: "Flying Saucers" on the Unofficial UFO Day? Media Manipulation or Stupidity in Ireland

This section critically analyzes a report in 'The Irish Examiner' about strange objects seen in the Irish sky on June 24, 2002, which was apparently declared 'UFO Day' by 'astronomers worldwide'. The article links this to the 1947 Kenneth Arnold sighting, which is credited with igniting public interest in UFOs. The Irish report mentions 'pulsating objects' seen hovering in the sky, with sightings reported between Dublin and Armagh. The report quotes Jim Flora from the 'Ufology Centre', who suggests UFOs are regularly seen along 'ley lines' – occult power paths. The author dismisses these claims, suggesting that alcohol consumption during a pub conversation between a journalist and a UFOlogist might have led to confusion. The article also touches upon a 'floating' object seen in the northwestern sky from Ireland.

Article 3: (Opinion) Chaos in Extraordinary Sky Events

This section presents several incidents that caused confusion and debate.

Jerusalem Incident (July 5, 2002)

An Israeli pilot reported a 'bright flash' after a flight between Tel Aviv and Moscow, which could have been a rocket explosion. The incident was under investigation in Israel and Moscow. This is contrasted with the Tupolev crash over the Black Sea in October of the previous year, attributed to a Ukrainian surface-to-air missile.

Meteor or Rocket?

The next day, an 'Allied Press' report from Kiev suggested the 'rocket explosion' was likely a meteor, described as a 'large, blue fireball' by pilots. The Ukrainian space agency also confirmed the meteor theory. This incident occurred shortly after a real El Al plane crash and on the same day two people were shot at the El Al ticket counter in Los Angeles, leading to immediate accusations of a terrorist attack.

Bodensee and Lübeck Incidents

The report draws parallels to the plane collision over Lake Constance on July 1, 2002, where witnesses initially mistook the event for a 'comet' or 'out-of-control satellite'. It also mentions a fiery phenomenon observed over Lübeck on July 4, 2002, which police initially thought was a hot air balloon or small aircraft fire.

Fireball-Bolide Events

The article discusses the April 6 fireball-bolide event over Southern Germany, noting that it was filmed by few people, unlike the 1992 Peekskill fireball. It highlights the confusion among experts regarding the cause of such events, with explanations ranging from auroras to UFOs.

The 'Ikeya-Zhang' Comet and the 6. April Fireball

The ESOC in Darmstadt initially explained the 6. April event as a reentry object from a US rocket. However, CENAP proposed it was a super-fireball-bolide. The report questions the assumption that 'elite witnesses' like pilots and airport tower personnel can reliably distinguish UFOs from other phenomena, citing confusion at Munich Airport's control tower.

Article 4: B-TV on the UFO Hunt: Failure of a "Campaign"

This section details a campaign by the German regional TV channel B-TV in Baden-Württemberg to investigate UFO sightings during August 2002. The station's news editor, Michael Lindenau, invited viewers to share their experiences, photos, and videos of 'extraordinary celestial phenomena or UFOs'. A 'UFO-Task Force' was assembled, and the best submission would receive a valuable video camera.

The Campaign's Genesis

The initiative stemmed from an email sent by the author to B-TV, proposing a 'UFO Summer Action' to generate interest. The idea was well-received, and a meeting was scheduled with the chief editor.

Campaign Execution and Outcome

B-TV ran promotional trailers and on-screen banners for the campaign. The author provided background information on the Men in Black (MIB) saga. However, the campaign was short-lived, reportedly due to B-TV's 'preliminary insolvency' after a shareholder withdrew. The author notes that the campaign was executed with little enthusiasm and received little follow-up.

Article 5: British Police Helicopter Encountered an Unidentified Flying Object

This article reports on an alleged dramatic chase by a police helicopter of an unidentified flying object (UFO) over Brighton, UK, on August 11, 2000. Sergeant John Tickner and paramedic Sean Mitchell encountered a 'glowing object' that hovered near them before disappearing. They attempted to follow it for three minutes using a thermal video camera.

Witness Accounts and Skepticism

Neither Tickner nor Mitchell were convinced it was an alien craft, describing it as a 'fun thing' and joking about 'little green men'. They provided the footage to a TV company, and the story was picked up by a magazine and shown at a UFO conference. UFO enthusiasts, however, interpreted it as potential evidence of extraterrestrial life.

Miniatur Hot Air Balloon Theory

Werner Walter, from the UFO reporting center CENAP, suggests the object might have been a miniature hot air balloon, which are sometimes released by partygoers and can appear as 'glowing objects' at night. He notes that while police encounters with UFOs have been reported before, this is the first known instance of a police helicopter filming such an event in Europe. He also points out the unusual ease with which the police were able to commercialize the footage.

International Reactions

BBC Kent covered the incident, offering a short video clip. International reactions included Bill Moore from the USA, who saw it as a case escaping censorship, and Nick Hunter from New Zealand, who suggested it was a miniature hot air balloon. Other readers offered various interpretations, including advanced drones.

Spanish and Belgian Input

Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos from Spain reported that a Belgian SOBEPS member saw a report on BBC World about the incident. Patrick Vantuyne described the object on video as a dark silhouette with a burning flame, suggesting it was a small, homemade miniature hot air balloon.

Article 6: UFO Classic Socorro: Just a Manned Hot Air Balloon?

This section revisits the famous Lonnie Zamora incident in Socorro, New Mexico, on April 24, 1964. Zamora reported seeing a strange object land and two figures emerge. The object then ascended vertically. Project Blue Book investigated the case and classified it as 'unsolved'.

Alternative Explanations

Major Hector Quintanilla Jr. of Project Blue Book suspected the object was a test flight of an early 'lunar lander'. Phil Klass suggested it might have been a hoax to boost the local economy. The article notes that Socorro is known for its annual golf tournament, sponsored by Conrad Hilton, and that Barron Hilton was a hot air balloon enthusiast.

Hot Air Balloon Hypothesis

Larry Robinson, a UFO researcher, proposed that the Socorro object was a manned hot air balloon. He points out that modern hot air balloon flights in the USA were rare in 1964, with only about 20 registered and flying by April 1964. The company Raven-Industries was known for manufacturing manned hot air balloons, including models with white, reflective Mylar-Nylon envelopes.

USAF's Oversight

The article mentions that the USAF investigated possible causes, including weather balloons, but did not consider manned hot air balloons, which is described as a 'faux pas'. The noise from a manned hot air balloon's burner can be significant.

Article 7: "Most Exciting UFO Case" in America, 2002?

This part discusses a sighting in Waldorf, Maryland, on July 26, 2002, where Renny Rogers reported two F-16 jets from Andrews AFB ascending and flying over his house. While the jets were circling, he observed a 'faint bluish light with phenomenal speed' moving across the sky. The object was silent, and the jets were not in sight when it disappeared.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO reports, the role of media in sensationalizing or misinterpreting events, and the tendency to seek extraordinary explanations for phenomena that may have mundane causes. The editorial stance appears to be skeptical, emphasizing the importance of rigorous investigation and questioning assumptions, particularly when it comes to witness testimony and the interpretation of visual evidence. The report highlights instances where misidentification, hoaxes, or natural phenomena are often overlooked in favor of UFO explanations.

This issue of CENAP-Report, dated December 2003, focuses on various aerial phenomena and UFO-related incidents, presenting a collection of reports and analyses from different regions and time periods. The magazine aims to investigate and clarify these sightings, often distinguishing between genuine unexplained phenomena and misidentifications.

Washington D.C. Incident (Pages 1-2)

The report begins with an account of an observation near Washington D.C. A witness described seeing a blue light shoot across the sky, followed by an F-16 fighter jet. The blue light was described as star-sized with no sharp edges. The witness was unsure if the F-16 was pursuing the light, but both objects moved southwest. The sighting occurred under cloudy conditions, with the sky clearing later. The witness contacted WTOP-Radio and UFO Research. Joan Woodward investigated, speaking with Major Barry Venable of Andrews AFB, who confirmed that two F-16s had been scrambled to investigate 'suspicious aerial activity' over D.C. The F-16s found nothing and returned. Venable explained that radar had detected an 'unknown aircraft' around 1 AM, and after its track disappeared, the F-16s were dispatched. Woodward explained her interest in the 'UFO matter.'

Amy Morris from a radiostation further investigated, learning that the F-16s belonged to the '113th fighter unit' of the Air National Guard. Their deployment was attributed to the heightened security situation post-September 11, 2001. Morris also contacted NORAD, which reported 'something' on radar at the time but did not investigate further, citing their different operational priorities.

A Reuters report from September 7, 2002, is cited, detailing increased fighter jet activity over Washington D.C. and New York City post-9/11. Between September 2001 and January 2002, 200 additional fighter jets and 10,000 personnel were deployed nationwide for security. A specific incident on June 19 is mentioned where military jets were scrambled for an 'unidentified object' in restricted airspace near the White House, which turned out to be a small private plane whose pilot was lost.

The UFO from Flight 564, March 21, 1995 (Pages 2-4)

This section details a UFO observation made by the crew of American West Flight 564 (callsign "Cactus 564") on March 21, 1995, during a thunderstorm near Tieban, Texas. The sighting was featured on the History Channel's "UFOs: Then and Now?". The crew reported seeing a long UFO with several white flashing lights. Walter W. Webb of Alt-NICAP collected a UFO questionnaire from the pilot. The object was described as a "mother ship" of UFOlogy, a long, "cigar-shaped" structure with many large lights.

CUFON reports the encounter occurred around 9:30 PM in New Mexico (?). The aircraft departed Dallas/Ft. Worth, heading west. The crew noticed strobing lights rotating counter-clockwise north of their position, ahead of a thunderstorm. They reported this to the FAA Air Route Traffic-Control-Zentrum in Albuquerque. CUFON obtained documentation, including a transcript of the cockpit and air traffic control recordings.

The recordings begin at 9:21 PM. Flight 564 was at 13,000 meters when strobing lights appeared at the 3 o'clock position, above the clouds. The area was restricted airspace. At 9:30 PM, the phenomenon was still visible, but not detected by onboard radar or ARTC. The Cactus crew insisted on their visual sighting of a light phenomenon below their altitude, estimated at 3,000 meters lower. At 9:31 PM, the FAA contacted Cannon AFB, which reported no unusual activity. The FAA then contacted "Cactus" again, but the crew had no explanation. They described a long, dark, cigar-shaped object over 100 meters long with flashing lights, calling it "pretty eerie looking."

The pilot, with 15 years of experience, stated he had never seen anything like it, suggesting it might be military. Another aircraft, "Hawk 85," inquired about the situation. The FAA contacted NORAD (alias Bigfoot) at 9:48 PM regarding reports from crews around Tucumcari, N.M. NORAD reported difficulty in radar coverage of the area and no known objects.

The case is filed under "Airline Crew Reports Cigar With Pulsing Lights" (West-Texas, May 25, 1995) in FUFOR's July 1996 report. This report suggests the aircraft involved was a B-757, causing a date discrepancy. The investigation by Walter N. Webb of the UFO Research Coalition included interviews with the affected crew and FAA controllers. The B-757 was flying from Tampa to Las Vegas when the crew saw a series of bright, white lights sequentially flashing from left to right, described as a dark, wingless, cigar-shaped object within the thunderstorm cloud layer. The object's distance was indeterminate. NORAD reportedly detected an "unidentified radar track" near the Boeing 757, which later disappeared with a speed of up to 1,400 mph. However, this could not be confirmed.

Webb's FOIA request revealed no military activity that night and no known phenomena to explain the sighting. The author dismisses explanations like meteorites or lightship-blimps due to the object's speed and altitude. A B-2 stealth bomber is considered, but its own speed is a factor. The author also discusses the possibility of autokinetic effects or afterimages from lightning flashes causing misperceptions, as suggested by Ferhat Talayhan.

Cloud-Cigars and UFOs (Pages 4-5)

This section references an article in Fate magazine about "Fighter Jets versus UFOs," focusing on reports from Mexico and South America, particularly "cloud-sized cigar-shaped UFOs." Three cases are presented:

1. Mexico, March 23, 1999: A long object, approximately 2 kilometers in length, was sighted between 6:15 PM and 6:30 PM by tower personnel and airfield staff at Benito Juarez Airport. It appeared over the Texcoco dry lake, shrouded in clouds, and was seen by nearly two dozen people.
2. Northern Mexico City, early 1990s: An object described as a "mother ship" surrounded by smaller objects was sighted, causing alarm among air traffic controllers.
3. Northern Chile, 1978: Brigadier-General Hernan Gabrielli Rojas and Capt. Danilo Catalan were on a training flight when their Northrop F-5E's radar detected a large target. The object was described as "deformed cigar-shaped," bent like a banana, and covered in smoke. Its estimated size was "several aircraft carriers lined up - perhaps between 15 and 20 miles long." It kept pace with the aircraft for nearly 5 minutes. The object disappeared towards Easter Island, and the radar echo vanished. A French magazine mentioned this case, with a co-pilot describing it as a "gigantic, triangular, cloud-like, dark object."

Pre-Mars Hysteria: Pseudo-UFOs Expected at Pentecost (Pages 5-7)

This section details several sightings in Germany during June 2003 that were initially perceived as UFOs but were later identified as mundane objects or astronomical phenomena.

• Ludwigsburg, June 4, 2002: An elderly woman reported a stationary, large, orange, flickering light in the sky for half an hour. It was later identified as the star Capella.
• Duisburg, June 4, 2002: A man reported a "dull-colored light" moving slowly across the sky. This was identified as the star Vega.
• Hannover, June 4, 2002: A young couple reported a "star-like" appearance that occasionally moved "up and down" before freezing in place. This was identified as the star Arcturus, with perceived movements attributed to autokinetic effects.
• Saarlouis, June 5, 2003: A woman reported an "extreme spotlight" below the moon, possibly a "moon satellite" or the "Mars probe." This was identified as the planet Jupiter.
• Near Cologne, June 5, 2003: A driver reported seeing a "bright UFO" near the moon while driving. This was also likely an astronomical object.

Weather Balloon Phenomena (Pages 7-8)

This section discusses several incidents involving weather balloons that were mistaken for UFOs.

• Schweinfurt, June 7, 2003: A family observed a "sausage-like" object, dark, metallic, and shiny, rotating slowly in the sky. The author suggests this was a "Solar-UFO-Zeppelin" (a type of solar balloon).
• Vienna, June 2003: An amateur astronomer observed a "strange object" that appeared as an extremely bright point. It was described as a sphere of light with a smaller glowing sphere circling it, and a red point below. The object reportedly exploded into luminous parts that fell to the ground. This was identified as a meteorological balloon with a radiosonde.
• Stuttgart, June 22, 2003: An amateur astronomer observed the explosion of a weather balloon 15 km southeast of Stuttgart. The particles arranged like a globular cluster, and the instrument package "crashed" eastward. This observation helped clarify a similar, previously unexplained sighting from 18 years prior.
• Wetter, June 29, 2003: Eyewitnesses reported an unknown flying object over a business park. Police and a helicopter searched for the object. The neon-colored envelope of an unmanned weather balloon was found on a steep slope. The object was later identified as a weather balloon from the German Weather Service, carrying a measuring sonde.

Other Reports (Pages 8-10)

• Moscow, June 18, 2003: BILD reported on alleged "flying saucers" and disappearing metals from mines in Dalnegorsk, Siberia. The story claimed an object crashed, and metallic discs made of Siberian alloys were found. The author debunks this, stating the photos are from a pseudo-report by "Weekly World News" and an old TNT show, and the story is an embellished version of the "strange metal finds" at Hill 611.
• Oststeinbek, June 2003: Police responded to reports of UFOs over a business park. Two objects resembling "colorful kites without strings" were observed, described as high-flying and remote-controlled. They moved apart and then ascended and disappeared. Police described them as "technical gimmicks" and "unidentified (terrestrial!) flying objects."
• Ahrensburg, July 12, 2003: The Hamburger Abendblatt reported on two objects seen in the sky. Police initially had little information. A police officer involved described the objects as initially looking like "birds of prey in updraft," moving apart and then coming closer. Their speed and size were not estimable. Through binoculars, the officer saw a "technical gimmick," possibly a kite or ultralight aircraft, but not a UFO. The objects were described as flat, moving freely, and silent, with a square rear section. They were described as "quadratisch" with red sides and green-yellow interiors.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the misidentification of mundane objects (stars, planets, weather balloons) as UFOs, the role of military scrambles in response to unidentified aerial activity, and the investigation of historical and contemporary UFO cases. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, aiming to debunk sensational claims while acknowledging genuine unexplained phenomena. The author emphasizes the importance of public education regarding astronomical events to prevent unnecessary UFO scares. There's a clear effort to provide rational explanations for sightings, often attributing them to known objects or atmospheric effects, while still presenting intriguing cases that remain unexplained.

Title: CENAP-Report
Issue: Nr. 287
Date: December 2003
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of the CENAP-Report delves into several UFO-related topics, including recent sightings, historical media influence, and persistent legends.

Recent Sightings and Investigations

The report begins by discussing a case that initially appeared in the Hamburger Abendblatt, where the responsible editor was on leave and her replacement showed no interest. Despite the author leaving his contact information, no further developments occurred. A follow-up investigation by Thomas Schulte revealed that the sighting location was near the Hamburg-Boberg airfield, which also hosts activities like hot air balloon launches. This led to a comparison with a previous case from Bamberg, where a sighting was attributed to a glider from the local airfield. In the Hamburg case, while gliders were active earlier in the day, the airfield was closed by 9:30 PM. Roland Gehardt suggested that the observed phenomena might have been large kites, which could explain the lack of visible strings from a distance and their flight behavior, especially considering the reported thermal updrafts.

The issue then details a series of sightings on the evening of Saturday, July 26, 2003, breaking a period of quiet on the UFO reporting front.

Fehmarn Sighting

On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, Holger M. from Fehmarn contacted the author, reporting a strange phenomenon he witnessed on the preceding Saturday evening. Initially mistaken for a sea rescue flare, the object remained visible and moved towards his house. Three photos were taken with a digital camera. The witness described the phenomenon as seeming to 'burn - and yet not,' moving slowly, and occasionally stopping. The observation lasted about ten minutes. About 20 minutes later, a similar object reappeared for approximately five minutes, moving from a northeast to a northwest direction before disappearing behind a cloud. The weather was described as good, with a slight breeze, ideal for outdoor activities. The author later suggested that miniature hot air balloons, commonly used during beach parties on Fehmarn, could be a plausible explanation, a suggestion the witness accepted.

Gundelsheim and Sonthofen Sightings

Two other observers also reported strange phenomena on the same night, July 26, 2003.

In Gundelsheim, Mr. Sch. (a retiree) described a 'strange glowing phenomenon' that rose from behind the trees in the west, appearing like a 'red-orange full moon.' It ascended slowly and linearly for minutes before disappearing like a star behind clouds. The observation was completely silent. The weather was good.

In Sonthofen, Ms. Elsa K. reported seeing a 'bursting fireball' over fields for several minutes. It appeared to be coming directly towards her and was higher than the trees. Its color was a mix of yellow and red. She stopped her car to observe it more closely, noting it was higher than she initially thought. The object hovered slowly, as if 'choosing her,' before it seemed to 'tip over' and 'burst like a fireball' into thousands of sparks within two seconds, all without sound. She estimated its size to be about as large as a pigeon's egg at arm's length, noting a 'red core' and a lighter 'haze,' with the light from within 'pumping.' The author again concluded that miniature hot air balloons were the likely explanation for both the Gundelsheim and Sonthofen sightings.

Case of Arson: The 'UFO Commander'

Under the heading 'Ex-Student: I am a UFO Commander,' the report details the case of a 33-year-old ex-social pedagogy student from Mönchengladbach who was facing charges of arson. He had previously set his room on fire in 2001 and, in July 2003, set crumpled paper on fire on his balcony. The student claimed to have experienced delusions since a 1999 trip to Kenya, believing he was being pursued by evil forces he wanted to drive away with fire. He admitted to setting fire to a pillow and a mattress two years prior. After being taken to a psychiatric hospital, he refused medication, believing he was God. Following his medication, he claimed to be a 'UFO Commander' and believed UFOs had landed when apprehended at the airport. A psychiatric evaluation diagnosed him with chronic schizo-affective psychosis, deeming him not guilty by reason of insanity and requiring ongoing treatment.

Historical Context: 'Flying Saucers' in Germany

The report then shifts to a historical perspective, examining how the concept of 'flying saucers' became widely known and popular in Germany.

The 'Raumschiff Orion' Phenomenon

In September 1966, Bavaria Studios in Munich broadcast the TV series 'Raumschiff Orion' (Spaceship Orion) on German public television. This series, featuring Commander Cliff Allister McLane (played by Dietmar Schönherr), was essentially about a 'flying saucer' and was a massive success, described as a 'multi-part hit' and a 'thrilling space adventure entertainment.' It was a novelty for Germany and significantly contributed to the public's fascination with UFOs.

Kristall Magazine and Early UFO Coverage

The magazine KRISTALL played a significant role in popularizing the topic. Starting with issue 25/1966, it featured a cover story titled "Is an invasion from space threatening? Spaceship ORION - fairy tale or soon reality?" This was accompanied by a series of articles on 'flying discs' (Flugscheiben) to investigate the mysterious UFO phenomenon. These articles included excerpts from Frank Edwards' book, "Flying Saucers - Are Real," published by Bulls Pressedienst. The report notes that this was a strategic move to promote the book.

Reader Reactions and Early UFOlogy

Reader letters from KRISTALL issues 26 and 27 of 1966 reveal early reactions and the nascent state of UFOlogy in Germany. Martha Kern from Mannheim, a spiritual UFO contactee and DUIST member, expressed joy that the topic was being covered, believing it was important for all of humanity. Anny Baguhn from Hamburg also celebrated the magazine's coverage, claiming there were "15,000 UFO groups" worldwide exchanging information. However, E. Berger from Bonn offered a counterpoint, stating, "No sensible person believes in 'Flying Saucers.' Primitive and yet imaginative human minds have always invented the ghosts that fit their time. UFOs belong to the superstition of the atomic age."

The 'Nazi Flying Saucer' Legend

Further reader letters from KRISTALL Nr. 27/1966 are discussed. Lou Zinsstag from Basel, an Adamski correspondent and DUIST representative for Switzerland, criticized the state of UFO research in Germany, stating, "UFO research in Germany unfortunately lies in the hands of sectarians and egomaniacs. The occult element has successfully infiltrated."

A letter from the DUIST leadership (Veits) praised Frank Edwards' research as objective and thought-provoking. The report then delves into the 'Nazi flying saucer' (Nazi-Untertassen) theme, referencing Frank Edwards' book and the idea that experts like Schriever, Habermohl, and Miethe had developed flying discs during WWII, with plans falling into the hands of the victors in 1945. The magazine KRISTALL had already reported on this in Nr. 2/1956 with a cover story titled "I flew a Flying Saucer for the First Time: The Greatest Sensation of the Year!"

Albert Speer, who had submitted a letter, stated that he had not personally seen any such craft before 1945 and believed that if there had been a serious background, he and Field Marshal Milch would have been informed.

Ex-General Field Marshal Erhard Milch also responded from Düsseldorf, stating he had no knowledge of the development or deployment of flying discs and that such a development would have taken years and fallen within his tenure as General Air Quartermaster. He noted that protocol records of development and procurement meetings still exist. The author expresses surprise that these 'VERY IMPORTANT letters' were never known within the UFO community and were possibly concealed.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The CENAP-Report consistently examines UFO phenomena through a critical lens, often seeking rational explanations such as hot air balloons or misidentified conventional aircraft, as seen in the Fehmarn and Bamberg cases. However, it also dedicates significant space to historical aspects, particularly the influence of media like the 'Raumschiff Orion' series and early UFO literature on public perception. The report highlights the persistent fascination with 'Nazi flying saucers,' presenting historical documents and reader reactions from the 1960s to illustrate the development of these narratives. The editorial stance appears to be one of thorough investigation, presenting both witness accounts and potential explanations, while also critically analyzing the historical context and the evolution of UFO beliefs, particularly questioning the secrecy surrounding certain historical documents related to the 'Nazi flying saucer' legend.