CENAP Report - No 285

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP - REPORT
Issue: Nr. 285
Date: July 2003
Publisher: Not specified
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of CENAP REPORT, a German non-commercial UFO journal, focuses on the intersection of UFO phenomena with media, skepticism, and the publication's own transition from print to online. The cover prominently features the headline "Quo vadis, Werner Walter und der CENAP Report? - UFOs mal wieder im TV: Besprechungen und Kritiken - UFOs im US-Fernsehen - Cröffelbach 2003", indicating a multi-faceted discussion on UFOs in popular culture and media.

CENAP: Organization and Mission

The second page provides an "Impressum" identifying Werner Walter as the publisher and editor, located in Mannheim. It further elaborates on CENAP (Centrale Erforschungsnetz Außergewöhnlicher Himmelsphänomene), established in 1976. CENAP is described as a private, non-ideological organization dedicated to receiving, analyzing, and evaluating reports of unidentified flying objects (UFOs). It maintains a critical stance and is associated with the GWUP (Society for the Scientific Investigation of the Paranormal) and the Society for Anomalistics. CENAP aims to clarify the UFO topic through collaboration with national and international institutions, information exchange, and maintaining an extensive UFO video archive. Its objectives include public education and demystification of UFOs, working with media (TV, radio, press, internet) and scientific institutions like universities, planetariums, and observatories through lectures and public discussions.

Table of Contents

Page 3 lists the contents of this issue:

• Quo vadis, WW und CR ? (Page 4)
• UFO - Depesche aus Mannheim: Ein Hintergrundbericht (Page 12)
• UFOs - mal wieder im Fernsehen (Page 82)
• UFOs im US-TV (Page 116)
• Star Trek - Konzepte auf dem Prüfstand (Page 142)
• Meldungen aus der Wissenschaft (Page 148)
• Cröffelbach 2003 (Page 152)

Article: 30 JAHRE DEN UFOS AUF Der Spur: QUO VADIS WW UND CR ?

This article, starting on page 4, delves into philosophical questions about reality, perception, and belief, particularly in the context of UFOs and media. It references thinkers like Plato, George Berkeley, and Immanuel Kant to discuss the nature of reality and how we perceive it. The author questions the reliability of our senses and the influence of electronic mass media in shaping our understanding of reality, drawing parallels to Jean Baudrillard's concept of simulation. The article suggests that for many UFOlogists, UFOlogy is a product of creative fantasy, where everyday reality is equated with media entertainment. It posits that physical reality, governed by natural laws, is distinct from our subjective perception of it. The author encourages a decision on whether to engage with these 'virtual worlds' or remain outside, noting that while the mundane day may hold no secrets, the 'X-world' offers grand revelations. The need for redefinitions is emphasized.

Werner Walter's Role and the Transition of CENAP REPORT

Pages 5-10 extensively discuss Werner Walter's role and the challenges faced by the print edition of CENAP REPORT. The text highlights Walter's unique position as a prominent skeptic in the German UFO scene, often referred to as the "UFO-Oberskeptiker" and "Anti-UFOloge," yet also as a "walking UFO lexicon" due to his comprehensive knowledge. His book "UFOs: Die Wahrheit" (1996) is mentioned as a significant publication that also coincided with a decline in public interest in UFOs.

The article details Walter's extensive media work, including TV appearances where he acted as a consultant, leading to popular and repeated shows. It also mentions his 20-part monograph series "UFOs - Grenzenlos" and his public lectures at various educational institutions.

A significant portion of the text focuses on the demise of the print CENAP REPORT. It describes a conflict and breakdown in communication between Walter and the CR distributor, Hans-Jürgen Köhler, and later Rudolf Henke, who took over copying and distribution. This led to the print CR being "torpedoed" by the printer, with the official death date marked as June 5, 2003. The article uses the metaphor of the "CR-Titantic" sinking.

Despite the end of the print version, Walter is portrayed as resilient and pragmatic, unwilling to be a "jammerer." He is determined to continue the CR series online, framing it as a continuation of his role as a pioneer in critical UFO phenomenon investigation. The move to an internet format is seen as a new platform for "knowledgeable and grounded skeptical UFO research," aiming to counter what is perceived as the mislabeled "Rat Pack" of ufology. The article acknowledges the difficulty of making money from UFO-related content online, citing failures of other ventures and the general decline in the market for such electronic publications.

Other Content

Brief mentions are made of other articles, including "UFO - Depesche aus Mannheim: Ein Hintergrundbericht" (Page 12), "UFOs - mal wieder im Fernsehen" (Page 82), "UFOs im US-TV" (Page 116), "Star Trek - Konzepte auf dem Prüfstand" (Page 142), "Meldungen aus der Wissenschaft" (Page 148), and "Cröffelbach 2003" (Page 152). The cover also references a "Wingless Plane" from a February 1951 Science & Mechanics magazine, suggesting a historical or speculative piece related to advanced aircraft.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO phenomena, the influence of media on public perception, and the challenges of publishing and disseminating information in this field. The editorial stance, as represented by CENAP and Werner Walter, is one of informed skepticism, aiming to provide a rational and evidence-based approach to UFO research, distinct from sensationalism or uncritical belief. The transition to an online format signifies an adaptation to changing media landscapes while maintaining a commitment to its core mission of critical inquiry and public education.

Title: CENAP REPORT
Issue: Nr. 285
Date: July 2003
Type: Magazine Issue

This issue of CENAP REPORT marks a significant transition, moving from a print format to an online presence. The editorial, penned by WW, reflects on the challenges of maintaining a print publication in an era where users expect content for free, citing Stephen King's success with an online book as a rare exception. The editor expresses a commitment to continuing the publication despite personal difficulties and the perceived decline of the print market, aiming to document the diverse and sometimes bizarre landscape of ufology.

Transition to Online Format

The editor, WW, announces the cancellation of the 'Downtown Blues' event and the shift of CENAP REPORT to an internet-based format, referred to as 'I-Net-CR'. This move is driven by the need to adapt to the current market, where users are less inclined to pay for print media. The editor acknowledges that this transition might be met with criticism but emphasizes that it's a necessary step to continue the publication. The online version is presented as a more affordable option, aiming to attract both new and long-time readers who may have migrated to online content.

History of UFO Terminology and Mythology

The issue traces the evolution of UFO terminology and the development of the UFO myth. It highlights the 1947 sighting by Kenneth Arnold near Mt. Rainier, where he observed sickle-shaped objects. A journalist's naming of these objects as "flying saucers" is credited with creating a potent myth that resonated with the emerging space age. The article notes that the term 'flying saucers' was widely used in the USA until the 1960s, with the more neutral term 'UFO' (Unidentified Flying Object) gaining traction in Germany only in the 1970s. The narrative suggests that the world was captivated by this myth, which inspired a visionary impulse and the belief in extraterrestrial spacecraft.

Critique of UFO Research Organizations

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a critical examination of various UFO research organizations, particularly DEGUFO. The editor questions the foundation and purpose of DEGUFO, noting that it was formed because existing groups supposedly didn't meet their 'requirements,' though these requirements are not specified. The article points out that DEGUFO's activities seem to overlap with what CENAP, GEP, and MUFON-CES were already doing. A particular focus is placed on DEGUFO's affiliations and ideological leanings. The editor notes that DEGUFO seems to draw heavily from Anthroposophy, a philosophy associated with Rudolf Steiner, and that its leading figures, like Peter Hattwig, tend to offer explanations for UFO sightings that the editor finds difficult to accept. The close relationship between DEGUFO and MUFON-CES, including an upcoming joint event, is also highlighted, with skepticism expressed about the scientific basis of their collaboration.

The editor criticizes DEGUFO's approach to research, suggesting that it often consists of reprinting internet reports and engaging in speculative 'identifications' rather than rigorous investigation. The article implies that DEGUFO's focus is more on philosophical discourse and self-promotion ('Artenschutz') than on empirical UFO research. The editor contrasts this with what they consider genuine UFO research, which involves detailed case analysis and evaluation, a process they believe is lacking in the broader UFO scene.

Personal Reflections and Editorial Stance

WW reflects on his personal journey and dedication to UFOlogy, recalling his childhood fascination with space and science fiction. He expresses a strong commitment to his editorial principles, even in the face of adversity and the perceived decline of the print market. The editor asserts his intention to continue documenting the UFO phenomenon, including its more unconventional aspects like 'Punk-UFOlogie,' and to maintain a critical yet open-minded perspective. He emphasizes that his goal is to document and accompany the 'ways and detours of ufology' without acting as an 'Inquisitor.' The editor also touches upon the common perception of UFO enthusiasts as 'spinners' (eccentrics) and suggests that this perception is partly due to the internal dynamics and self-referential discussions within the UFO community itself.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of CENAP REPORT strongly emphasizes the challenges facing ufological publications, particularly the shift from print to digital media and the expectation of free content. The editor, WW, demonstrates a critical yet persistent stance towards UFO research, advocating for rigorous investigation while acknowledging the speculative and often philosophical nature of the field. There is a clear critique of organizations that prioritize ideology or self-promotion over empirical evidence. The magazine also touches upon the historical development of UFO phenomena and terminology, placing current discussions within a broader context. The overall editorial stance appears to be one of determined documentation and critical analysis of the UFO scene in Germany and beyond.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, titled "Nr. 285, Juli 2003," delves into historical UFO sightings and the author's personal journey into ufology. The magazine explores various reported incidents from the 1970s, examining media coverage, witness accounts, and the challenges of investigating such phenomena. The author expresses a critical view of the lack of a "scientifically comprehensible basis" in much of UFOlogy, lamenting the prevalence of rhetoric over substance.

Historical UFO Sightings

The report revisits several notable UFO incidents:

Madrid Sighting (December 31, 1971)

Reported by BILD based on an AP-Meldung, a UFO was sighted over Madrid. The Spanish agency Cifra, citing eyewitnesses, described the object as a large red sphere that was visible for about 20 minutes before disappearing northward. Subsequently, three smaller unknown objects appeared for approximately ten minutes. This sighting was later attributed to a weather balloon that was illuminated at sunset.

Scandinavian UFO Fleet (New Year's Night 1972)

This incident, reported by Dr. Alphons Schauseil for BILD on January 4, 1972, involved a pilot of a holiday jet who, while preparing to land in Bergen, Norway, observed seven bright white points flying in formation overhead in the night sky. The pilot, Oddmund Karlsson, estimated their altitude at 20,000 meters. The report notes that 124 passengers on the flight also witnessed the phenomenon. The formation was also seen over Mittelschweden by Häkan Berglund and Anders Hedberg, who reported the objects slowed down over Sveg before descending and then rapidly accelerating. Forest worker Lennart Jonsson observed the UFOs for three minutes over Lembacken in Värmland. Residents in Stockholm, Eskilstuna, Gävie, and Östhammar also reported sightings, prompting calls to the police and army. However, air surveillance detected no UFO reflections on NATO radar screens in Norway or Swedish defense warning systems. Major Erling Hornven of the Norwegian High Command confirmed receiving about 20 credible reports, consistently describing seven bright, round objects moving rapidly from northwest to southeast. The Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet questioned if "Martians celebrated New Year's in Scandinavia?" Eyewitnesses estimated speeds up to 4800 km/h. Tage Erriksson from the Swedish Defence Research Establishment suggested natural explanations like reflections or meteor showers, though a later explanation identified it as a disintegrating satellite re-entry.

Wiener Neustadt Sighting (May 3, 1972)

The Mannheimer Morgen reported a dpa-Meldung about an unknown flying object near Wiener Neustadt, Austria, about 50 kilometers south of Vienna. This sighting caused significant traffic delays on the Südautobahn. The object was described as round, highly reflective, with a cross symbol, clearly visible even without binoculars, and at a very high altitude of approximately 12,000 meters. Neither immediately dispatched aircraft nor the Vienna weather observatory could identify the object. The sighting reportedly vanished suddenly when aircraft approached, as reported by APA. This was also later explained as a weather balloon.

Personal Account: Luminous Trapezoid (September 5, 1973)

The author recounts a personal sighting on September 5, 1973, in Mannheim-Vogelstang, Germany, with an ex-schoolmate, Heinrich Schwierz. While playing table tennis, they observed a strange, luminous object in the clear night sky for about ten seconds. Described as dark red and visible only by its contour, the object flew horizontally over the horizon at an estimated 30-degree altitude before vanishing suddenly, as if a light was switched off. The object's surface was as black as the surrounding sky. The light phenomenon, at arm's length, was perhaps the size of a matchbox and left no trail. The sighting occurred near a large military tank training ground used by American NATO units. This observation was first presented in CENAP REPORT Nr. 24 in February 1978. The author suggests a possible explanation involving a Rubinlaser test within the military area, with ground fog or dust acting as a projection medium. He later experienced similar laser projections at a trade fair in Berlin, which reminded him of this sighting.

The Author's Journey into Ufology

The author details his early interest in UFOs, stemming from childhood fascination with space and science fiction, including the "Perry Rhodan" series. He admits to collecting newspaper clippings about UFOs without initially intending to delve deeply into the subject. His interest was reignited in the early 1970s, influenced by media reports and the general "UFO fever." He met his future CENAP partner, Hansjürgen Köhler, at work, and they bonded over a shared interest in UFOs, collecting newspaper articles and reading books, including those by Erich von Däniken.

The author describes how his friend Schwierz became a Jehovah's Witness, losing interest in UFOs. This experience highlighted for the author the phenomenon of "brainwashing." He contrasts the "worldview and sectarian faction of esoteric UFOlogy" with the emergence of "pre-scientific UFO research" from the mid-1970s onwards. He emphasizes the importance of systematic verification of UFO claims, investigating individual cases through direct contact with witnesses, conducting "counter-investigations," and tracing involved individuals.

He expresses frustration with the "stupidities" of the ufological fan club and the tendency towards "borderline idiotic" views. His stated goal remains to document "watertight" UFO reports by gathering comprehensive information and ensuring their reliability.

Media Influence and Historical Context

The issue touches upon the impact of media, such as the "Pascagoula abduction" wave, which significantly amplified UFO reports. The author notes that US astrophysicist J. Allen Hynek was mentioned in relation to confirming alien landings, further fueling public interest. The article also references Adolf Schneider's book "Besucher aus dem All" (Visitors from Space) and the general perception that UFOs were identical to alien spaceships.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes include the historical documentation of UFO sightings, the personal narratives of witnesses and investigators, the role of media in shaping public perception, and the author's commitment to a more rigorous, evidence-based approach to ufological research. The editorial stance is critical of unsubstantiated claims and sensationalism, advocating for a systematic and objective investigation of UFO phenomena, while acknowledging the personal impact such experiences can have.

Title: CENAP REPORT
Issue: Nr. 285
Date: July 2003
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of CENAP REPORT, dated July 2003, presents a retrospective and critical examination of the German UFOlogy scene, particularly focusing on the author's personal journey and observations from the 1970s onwards. The report emphasizes a shift from initial fascination to a more skeptical and scientifically-oriented approach.

Early Encounters and Organizations

The author recounts their initial immersion into UFOlogy, driven by a fascination with the phenomenon. This led to joining the 'Deutsche UFO/IFO-Studiengesellschaft e.V.' in Wiesbaden. The formation of the 'Private UFO-Forschungsgruppe Mannheim' on November 1, 1973, is highlighted as a significant event, with the author's intent to explore the broader UFO scene rather than fixating on a single aspect.

This exploration led to encounters with various groups, including the UFO-Jugendklub Lüdenscheid (later becoming GEP), and other independent researchers who felt alienated by the established, older structures and esoteric leanings of organizations like DUIST. The author also mentions the 'Private Forschungsgruppe für UFOlogie und Astro-Archäologie' led by Axel Ertelt in Halver, which published the magazine 'Mysteria'. A new generation of UFO enthusiasts, influenced by the space race and a more technical, scientific mindset, began to emerge.

Critiques of Established Groups and Contactees

The report details the author's growing disillusionment with certain UFO organizations, particularly DUIST. The author criticizes the "contactees" promoted by DUIST, who claimed to have relationships with aliens from Mars and Venus and described fantastical scenarios, such as aliens using trains with plush sofas on the Moon. The author attended a DUIST meeting and found it populated by elderly individuals, some of whom were asleep, and felt the discussions lacked scientific rigor and clarity.

A significant event was the formation of S.O.E. (UFO research group) on November 17, 1975, by Frank Bruns, Herbert Mohren, and Axel Ertelt, based in Luxembourg. S.O.E. presented itself as an "Invisible College," similar to concepts explored by Dr. A.J. Hynek and Dr. Jacques Vallée in the USA. However, S.O.E. eventually sent out a "top secret" case report allegedly from a Spanish UFO organization named "Condor," which turned out to be a fabrication. This led to pressure, and S.O.E. vanished from the scene in February 1976.

These experiences made the author and their colleagues suspicious, feeling that something was amiss in these circles. The author, as a 16-year-old, joined DUIST but found themselves compelled to write critical letters, feeling that German UFO youth were being misled by directed propaganda and untruths, as noted by Anny Veit.

The Apollo 11 Incident and Media Manipulation

The author recounts the impact of Carl Sagan and Jerome Agel's book "Cosmos" in fostering a "cosmic perspective" and further fueling interest in UFOs. A pivotal moment was the UFO-Nachrichten Nr. 238/239 (July/August 1976) reporting on a "Fiery Red Ball over the City of Ansbach." While Herausgeber Veit dismissively attributed such sightings to "birthday party hot air balloons," the author suspected a cover-up, suggesting that a Venus spaceship was being disguised as a balloon. This occurred during a period of perceived "UFO invasions" across Germany and beyond.

Investigating the Ansbach incident, the author requested newspaper reports and received two articles that clearly identified the "UFO visitors" as originating from a birthday party. The author also attempted to clarify this with Herr Veit, who was also involved in disputes regarding Apollo-11 UFO formation footage from Japan, which appeared to be optically manipulated and possibly faked.

Evolution Towards Skepticism and Scientific Method

As the author and their colleagues became known as troublemakers within the DUIST UFO scene, they were expelled. This experience solidified their role as investigators who identified manipulations by UFOlogists. The author's activity evolved into becoming a "fighter" against the rise of pseudoscience and falsehoods, viewing the "New Age" movement as an "atavistic relapse into the Middle Ages."

During this period, the author met Klaus Webner from Wiesbaden, who had researched classic UFO photo and film cases. Webner's analyses cast doubt on photographic evidence of flying saucers, as he could replicate almost any UFO photograph himself, effectively outdoing amateur hoaxers. This realization led to a collapse of the author's previously held worldview.

The author expanded their connections with CENAP to the USA and other nations, acquiring a collection of old APRO and NICAP issues, and a near-complete collection of the English FSR, from a disillusioned correspondent. This revealed a starkly different picture of UFOlogy compared to the esoteric and pseudoreligious narratives promoted by groups like the Veit family.

This broader perspective made the author more skeptical of UFO cases and UFOlogists, leading to greater independence and emancipation. The author notes that many critics who accuse them of not understanding UFOlogy have not read nearly as much as they have.

CENAP REPORT's Mission

In March 1976, the "risk enterprise" CENAP was launched with the monthly magazine CENAP REPORT (CR). Initially produced with simple hectography (spirit duplication) due to the cost of photocopies, the magazine aimed to spark rebellion and change within UFOlogy. The goal was to foster a renaissance of UFOlogy, moving it away from esoteric degeneration towards a genuine UFO phenomenon research.

The small team behind CENAP aimed to provide factual information not found in mainstream newspapers or typical UFO publications, which they saw as catering to a "fantastic" audience. They sought to be "alternative" and rebellious, approaching UFO facts without platitudes or mystifying phrases. Their objective was to expose the downsides of UFOlogy, burst illusions, and challenge the prevailing mindset.

Colliding with the "ufological powers" and "powers-that-be" was considered a "professional risk" and almost a privilege from the outset for CENAP. The magazine sought to inform and inject new impulses into the decaying field of UFOlogy, offering a new direction.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the historical development of UFOlogy in Germany, the critique of established UFO organizations and their methodologies, the exposure of hoaxes and manipulations, and the advocacy for a scientific and skeptical approach to the UFO phenomenon. The editorial stance is clearly critical of pseudoscientific claims, esoteric interpretations, and unsubstantiated evidence, promoting a rational and evidence-based investigation.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, dated July 2003, is a personal reflection by the author on their role and experiences within the field of ufology. The author positions themselves as a critical observer and a 'motor' for a 'ranger unit' of UFO research, emphasizing the need for inspired leadership and dedicated individuals. The publication itself is described as a small, independent private journal that has faced significant challenges.

Author's Stance and Role

The author identifies with a skeptical approach, distinguishing themselves from those who blindly believe in UFOs and from 'debunkers' who are quickly dismissed by ufologists. They describe being labeled as 'debunkers' and 'ufological demagogues' for their critical stance. The author acknowledges that their efforts to clear up uncertainties might remove some of the 'excitement' from the topic, but this is a price they are willing to pay for independence.

Challenges of Independent Publishing

The author details the financial and personal struggles involved in running an independent publication. The CENAP REPORT (CR) has been a 'subsidy business' from the start, driven by idealism. The author mentions the internal cohesion needed to weather periods of financial instability. The printed version of the CR eventually collapsed and moved online, a transition that the author attributes to internal disputes, a 'village-like narrow-mindedness,' and general 'world dissatisfaction' among those involved.

Personal Experiences and Conflicts

The author recounts a particularly negative experience with an individual who, after being helped by the author to gain a name in the 'skeptic' scene, later turned against them. This individual, initially trying to join MUFON-CES but failing, was given the author's 'post' as UFO-Chief of GWUP. When this also didn't work out, a conflict arose, which the author describes as a diversionary tactic. The author also mentions that this individual, along with Edgar Wunder, formed their own association, but the individual soon left, preferring to work alone.

Research Methodology and Archival Work

A significant portion of the text is dedicated to the author's research methods, particularly their extensive work in building an independent UFO newspaper report archive. The author realized that information circulating in ufological journals was often superficial ('fog soup') and not necessarily reliable. To counter this, they actively sought out UFO reports from newspaper and magazine archives across the country, a process that was costly but ultimately successful. They describe visiting archives at the University of Mannheim and the Frankfurter Rundschau, and mention private newspaper archives like 'papyrus Zeitungsantiquariat' in Wuppertal.

Critiques of UFOlogy

The author is highly critical of the mainstream ufological community, stating that many 'UFO researchers' are incompetent and confuse research with debating theories from speculative literature. They describe this as 'confirmation bias' where fans reinforce each other's pre-existing beliefs. The author also criticizes the 'media presence' and 'circulation strength' of leading figures in ufology, suggesting they sometimes mislead the public due to their ideological biases. The author believes that many UFO phenomena are easily explainable if one has the necessary knowledge, but that a 'mass sickness' exists in the field, where few are interested in acquiring this background knowledge.

The Role of IFOs

The author strongly advocates for the importance of IFOs (Identified Flying Objects) in understanding UFO sightings. They argue that the majority of UFO reports can be explained by IFOs and that the failure to recognize and investigate these is a fundamental problem in ufology. The author refers to this as 'IFO-multi-causality' and criticizes the 'kitsch factor' surrounding 'flying saucers' that 'ruins' the UFO topic.

Personal Motivation and Financial Investment

The author's motivation for pursuing UFO research stems from the hope that any given case might be the one to provide definitive proof of an exotic, non-human phenomenon. This has led them to delve deeply into all aspects of the subject. The author admits that this pursuit is no longer an 'adventure for life' but a dedicated commitment, having spent a significant portion of their life on it. They estimate having spent over 50,000 Euros on this endeavor, including approximately 12,000 DM on postage alone for the CR's sample copies.

The Demise of the Printed CENAP REPORT

The printed CENAP REPORT ceased publication on June 5, 2003. The author notes that the sold copies rarely exceeded 70. The transition to an online format is seen as a way to reach more readers and potentially revive the publication, likening it to a phoenix rising from ashes. However, the author also expresses concern that this move might inadvertently accelerate the decline of other remaining print publications in the field.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards mainstream ufology, criticism of its practitioners and their methods, the challenges of independent and critical journalism, and the author's personal journey and extensive research into identifying mundane explanations (IFOs) for UFO sightings. The editorial stance is clearly one of critical inquiry, emphasizing factual investigation over sensationalism and blind belief.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, number 285, dated July 2003, delves into a critical examination of ufology, presenting a skeptical perspective on many UFO claims. The author, who describes themselves as a 'walking UFO lexicon' and a skeptic, argues that the field is often driven by entertainment and emotional appeal rather than scientific inquiry.

The Shift from UFOs to IFOs

The author recounts a personal shift in perspective, moving from an initial interest in UFOs to a more skeptical stance, recognizing many alleged UFOs as IFOs (Identified Flying Objects). This realization led to the understanding that much of what is presented as alien stories is simply a 'hoax' or 'swindle.' The author notes that the commercialization of the UFO field and the lack of critical examination contribute to this phenomenon.

Ufology: Entertainment vs. Science

A central theme is the assertion that ufology appeals more to the heart than the head, making rigorous scientific investigation difficult. The report suggests that for many participants, ufology serves as a form of entertainment, akin to 'The X-Files' coming true. The author criticizes 'UFOtainment,' where individuals and organizations profit from UFO-related content, often presenting themselves as serious researchers while potentially deceiving the public.

The Heilbronn Seminar: A Case Study

The issue details a UFO seminar held in Heilbronn on April 28, 2001, organized by the Association of Friends of Stars (VdS) and Edgar Wunder's former Forum Parawissenschaften (FoPa). Titled 'UFOs between facts and fiction,' the seminar aimed to bridge the gap between scientific investigation and UFO research. However, the event reportedly had low attendance, with a notable absence of prominent figures from both astronomy and ufology. The author suggests that astronomers generally show little interest in UFOs, while ufologists may be reluctant to discuss their beliefs in a scientific context.

Challenges in Scientific Investigation

The report highlights the difficulties in conducting credible UFO research. The author emphasizes that scientific investigation requires verifiable evidence and that the burden of proof lies with those making extraordinary claims. The ease with which 'evidence' can be fabricated or misinterpreted is a recurring concern. The author criticizes the demand for proof of non-existence, stating that it does not align with scientific principles.

The Problem of Evidence and Falsification

A significant portion of the report is dedicated to the issue of evidence, particularly photographic evidence. The author states that a substantial percentage of previously accepted UFO photographs have been identified as fakes or misinterpretations. Modern techniques like computer analysis are mentioned as tools for detecting fakes, but the author also notes that these methods can be circumvented or even become traps themselves. The report points to cases like the Fehrenbach case and others where photographic evidence was later revealed to be fabricated, often using simple trickery.

The Role of Skepticism

The author advocates for a skeptical approach, emphasizing the importance of falsifiability in scientific claims. They argue that evidence presented by UFO proponents should be made accessible for critical review by skeptics. The report criticizes those who keep their 'evidence' hidden, suggesting it stems from a fear of it being debunked by knowledgeable skeptics. The idea of an 'absolute UFO phenomenon proof' is presented as something that would be undeniably true, regardless of its nature.

UFOlogy's Weaknesses

The report concludes that ufology, as a field, suffers from fundamental weaknesses. It is characterized by a lack of rigorous methodology, a reliance on anecdotal evidence, and a susceptibility to sensationalism and hoaxes. The author suggests that the field needs 'bold reforms' to move towards a more scientific approach, but acknowledges that this is more challenging than in politics.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards UFO claims, the distinction between UFOs and IFOs, the challenges of evidence verification in ufology, and the critique of 'UFOtainment' as a commercialized and entertainment-driven aspect of the field. The editorial stance is clearly critical of the current state of ufology, advocating for a more evidence-based and scientifically grounded approach, while acknowledging the public's fascination with the topic.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, number 285 from July 2003, delves into the complexities of UFO research, questioning the methodology and reliability of collected data. The publication appears to be a critical analysis of UFO phenomena, with a skeptical stance towards unsubstantiated claims.

Key Articles and Discussions

MUFON-CES and the ARGUS Platform

The report begins by discussing the limitations of photographic evidence in UFO research, using the analogy of throwing a disk-shaped object. It highlights a notable encounter with Wolfgang Stelzig and another MUFON-CES representative, Dr. Koschnitzke, who presented their automatic observation platform, ARGUS. The primary goal of ARGUS is to collect truly objective UFO data, independent of human perception. However, the article notes that even Hynek recognized 30 years prior that UFO phenomena largely consist of human reports, emphasizing the reliance on what people tell us. The MUFON-CES representatives themselves conceded that human testimony is a weak point, leading to uncertainties, especially since most UFO reports can be explained conventionally.

Skepticism Towards UFO Explanations

The author contrasts the MUFON-CES representatives' view with their chairman's belief that only 5% of UFOs are explainable. The article points out that even the prototypes of 'real UFO' recording and observation stations, like ARGUS, could be rendered useless by the very phenomena they aim to detect, particularly if 'energy-absorbing fields' emitted by UFOs are involved. This raises questions about the practicality and effectiveness of such systems, especially given the financial needs of MUFON-CES, which are described as being in the tens of thousands of marks, surprisingly low for a group of academics.

The report questions the logic of deploying such stations, particularly in 'UFO-poor' regions like Germany, when even established foreign stations in supposedly UFO-frequented zones have failed. The author suggests a 'UFO-culture-bound syndrome' among some researchers, detached from reason and common sense.

Historical UFO Research and Failures

The article reviews several past ufological operations, including projects like 'Identification' by Rutledge, 'Vestigia,' and 'Starlight International' in the USA, as well as operations in France (SVEPS) and Denmark (SUFOI). All of these reportedly failed to produce results accepted by the scientific community.

The author views the underlying idea of the ARGUS platform as a 'reaction' to disappointments in UFO research, an attempt to systematically investigate 'real UFOs' despite inherent contradictions. The article criticizes the approach of some MUFON-CES members who claim to be interested only in the UFO phenomenon and not in 'UFO politics,' while simultaneously accepting the premise that real UFOs have measurable physical interactions with the environment. This is linked to Ludwig's stance that without irrefutable data from automatic recordings, UFO hypotheses remain speculation.

The 'Materialist' Debate and Fringe Science

The report touches upon the concept of 'materialists' within the fringe science scene, suggesting that some may not be genuine materialists but use the label to appear credible. The author implies that a lack of background knowledge and critical thinking fuels the 'silent invasion' of unsubstantiated ideas.

UFO Detection and Case Studies

The article mentions an incident from Esotera Nr. 11/1979, where a student named Bruce Derrik allegedly recorded a UFO using a self-made detector. He reported seeing a dark, car-sized, circular object and took two Polaroid photos. However, the image material was never made public, raising questions about its authenticity.

Hessdalen Project and Luminous Phenomena

In June 2001, reports emerged about automatic cameras in Hessdalen, Norway, capturing images of luminous phenomena over several years. The University of Tokyo provided significant funding for better equipment, including a second camera for 3D imaging and a radar system to determine if the phenomena are light or contain matter. The report notes that while some 'alarms' from the Hessdalen monitoring unit in 2001/2002 showed objects resembling 'thermal plasmas of unknown origin,' most images showed nothing unusual.

Four students, led by Jens-Christian Skibakk, are now involved in the Hessdalen project, focusing on the technical aspects. Despite over 20 years of research, the nature of the lights remains unknown, with possibilities ranging from aircraft to 'unexplained saucers.' The new research team has not personally witnessed these lights, spending most of their time in a laboratory in Sarpsborg.

The Exeter Case and 'Moving Stars'

The author recounts an experience at the Gehardt family's home, where interesting video material from the 'Sightings' series was shown. A segment on the famous Exeter sightings of September 3, 1965, particularly caught the author's attention. Newspaper reports from the time identified the UFOs as 'advertising material.' The author expresses surprise at this claim, as it had never been mentioned before. The article notes that the newspaper content was not shown, preventing verification of the 'advertising material' and miniature hot-air balloon connection. The official USAF explanation of a 'nighttime refueling maneuver during a military exercise' is dismissed as a cover-up.

Further investigation online led the author to a newsletter from the Reall-Organization, which discussed the 'Exeter File' by Martin Kottmeyer. Kottmeyer had already considered miniature hot-air balloons in this context, referencing a 1929 children's book that described how to build a 'Moving Star,' a self-made miniature hot-air balloon from balsa wood, wire, and red tissue paper. The article suggests that such 'paper lanterns' could easily cause public excitement due to their resemblance to UFOs.

The report places the Exeter case alongside the Socorro-CE III incident of April 24, 1964, in New Mexico, as significant events in UFOlogy. It also mentions John Fuller's book 'Incident at Exeter: The Story of Unidentified Flying Objects over America Today,' which fueled UFO interest, and his subsequent book 'The Interrupted Journey: Two Lost Hours 'Aboard a Flying Saucer',' which reportedly encouraged police officer Herbert Schirmer to recount his own alien encounter.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards UFO claims, critical analysis of research methodologies, and the historical context of UFO investigations. The editorial stance is clearly one of critical inquiry, emphasizing the need for verifiable evidence and questioning the reliance on anecdotal reports and unsubstantiated theories. The publication appears to advocate for a more rigorous, scientific approach to understanding anomalous phenomena, while highlighting the persistent challenges and failures in the field of UFOlogy.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, number 285 from July 2003, delves into the history and evolution of UFOlogy, with a particular focus on the mid-to-late 1960s.

The Commercialization of UFOlogy in the 1960s

The article highlights how the 'saucering' phenomenon became a profitable venture starting in the mid-1950s and continuing into the 1960s. James Moseley is cited as an example, admitting to earning $10,000 in 1966 alone from the topic, not just in revenue but as profit from his magazine, 'Saucer News'. Lectures also proved lucrative, with Donald Keyhoe, described as a 'leading ufological public figure,' commanding up to $750 per lecture plus expenses. Even lesser-known UFOlogists like Moseley could earn $400 per lecture, though they had to cover their own expenses. Moseley reflects that this period was a 'big deal' for everyone involved in the topic and traveling for lectures.

The Nature of UFO Lectures and Key Figures

Lectures during this era typically consisted of a historical presentation of 'flying saucer' history, followed by a discussion of current events and the origin of the objects. This was also the time when Stanton Friedman, known as 'The Flying Saucer Physicist,' gained prominence. Despite lacking formal academic or research positions, Friedman left his job to lecture. The article notes a competitive environment, with Friedman sometimes appearing at events where Moseley was already booked, aiming to 'out-maneuver' his competitor for lecture engagements. The text suggests a fierce competition for financial gain in this field.

Kenneth Arnold and the 'Money-Grubber' Label

Kenneth Arnold is also characterized as a 'money-grubber.' During a major UFO convention in New York City in 1967, Arnold reportedly demanded $4,000 as a fee, plus first-class flights for himself, his wife, and his mother-in-law, who would be traveling from Australia. This demand led to Arnold's cancellation from the event, causing him to harbor resentment towards the organizer, Moseley, for the rest of his life.

The 'Saucer Excitement' of the 1960s

Moseley describes the 'saucer excitement' of the mid-to-late 1960s as being exceptionally widespread and intense, surpassing similar periods before and after, including the 'Roswell and abduction manias' of the 1980s and 1990s. He states that 'flying saucers' were openly in everyone's mind, not just among the 'usual suspects.'

Shifting Perceptions by Government and Public

By this time, the Pentagon and the USAF no longer considered the UFO phenomenon a threat. Instead, they viewed them as a nuisance, akin to 'pesky flies,' even as 'saucermania' reached new heights in public interest. Notably, scientists began to emerge who spoke positively about UFOs, coinciding with the gradual establishment of the term 'UFO.'

Scientific Engagement with UFOs

The issue lists several scientists who were involved in UFOlogy and public discourse: James McDonald, Allen Hynek, Thornton Page, Jacques Vallée, and Carl Sagan. McDonald and Hynek presented to the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, advocating for a UFO study committee. The O'Brien Committee also reviewed the situation, and Congressman Gerald Ford facilitated a hearing by the Armed Services Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Carl Sagan and 'UFOs: A Scientific Debate'

Carl Sagan, then a young scientist (astronomer and exobiologist), co-edited the book 'UFOs: A Scientific Debate' with T. Page, published by Cornell University Press in 1972. This book brought together proponents and skeptics of UFO existence for a university-level discussion, featuring contributions from 15 scientists. Five of these contributions focused on sociological and psychological aspects of the UFO phenomenon, including perceptual psychology and psychiatric perspectives. William Hartmann, from the Condon Project, was also involved. Hartmann later retracted his earlier assessment of the 1950 McMinnville photos, deeming them fraudulent after gaining more expertise in photographic analysis.

Hartmann, the Condon Report, and Sagan's Views

The article notes that UFOlogists sometimes cite Hartmann's views from the Condon-Report era for political reasons, while often dismissing the report itself. Hartmann's later reassessment is frequently overlooked. At a 1966 meeting of the American Astronautical Society, Sagan even spoke about the possibility of extraterrestrial visits in antiquity, using cautious language like 'at least one visit may have occurred in historical times.'

Sagan's Book and Evolving Skepticism

Sagan later co-authored the book 'Cosmos: Neighbors: Life and Possibilities of Life in the Universe' with Jerome Agel, published in Germany in 1975. The article also mentions Dr. Ulrich Walter's book on extraterrestrial civilizations. Sagan's popular TV series 'Cosmos' is also referenced. The text observes that as Sagan aged, he became more skeptical about extraterrestrial visits to Earth, a trend the article attributes to demographic patterns in public opinion surveys where older respondents tend to be more skeptical.

Theoretical Frameworks: Rand Corporation and Thomas Gold

Sagan's views aligned with the prevailing scientific climate, influenced by the Rand Corporation's calculations suggesting billions of planets in the universe. Dr. Thomas Gold, an astronomy professor at Cornell University, theorized that life on Earth might have originated from 'spacemen' who visited Earth in the past, potentially as 'extraterrestrial farmers.' This idea fueled the burgeoning field of pre-astronautics.

USAF's Disengagement and Media Involvement

The USAF was reportedly unhappy about the renewed attention to UFOs and sought to disengage from the topic. Meanwhile, 'Science and Mechanics' began publishing 'objective' UFO articles, and major commercial publishers released UFO-themed magazines. Television also picked up the theme with series like ABC's 'The Invaders,' starring Roy Thinnes, who even attended Moseley's UFO convention at his own expense to promote the show.

Hynek's 'Swamp Gas' and the Decline of UFOlogy

Despite these developments, Allen Hynek's 'swamp gas fiasco' concerning the Michigan UFOs overshadowed other events, leading to a decline in UFOlogy's public standing by 1969, described as a 'fish gasping for air on the beach.'

The Hill Case and Alien Abduction Strategy

The article revisits the 'legendary' Hill case from 1961, suggesting a shift in alien strategy from benevolent warnings to abduction for study. The aliens' physical descriptions were contradictory: Betty Hill described them as having 'remarkably large noses,' while Barney Hill described them as having 'no nose at all, just two slits.' This discrepancy was seen by some as proof of extraterrestrial origin.

Hypnosis and Pseudo-Memories

The use of hypnosis in the Hill case is highlighted as a new 'research instrument' that would become a 'miracle cure.' The article warns that hypnosis can create 'pseudo-memories' that individuals believe are real. This led to a 1987 directive from the British Home Secretary prohibiting police from questioning witnesses under hypnosis.

Charles Fort and 'The Sky People'

Charles Fort's earlier writings suggested that Earth and humanity belonged to an unknown entity that might return. Brisley Le Poer Trench expanded on this in his 1960 book 'The Sky People,' a concept later adopted by pre-astronautics and abduction theorists, though the article dismisses it as an old idea repackaged.

The 'Big Sur' Incident and Film Evidence

A notable event discussed is the 'Big Sur' incident from the mid-1960s. During a test of an Atlas F-rocket from Vandenberg, a 'Flying Saucer' allegedly appeared, circled the rocket, and fired rays at it. The ground observation team reportedly filmed this event, and the film was later presented in a 'Sightings' episode. The article cites Illobrand von Ludwiger's book 'Der Stand der UFO-Forschung' (1994), which mentions that military officials were concerned about this film, describing it as confidential and inaccessible.

CENAP's Analysis of the 'Big Sur' Film

The CENAP report claims to have obtained and analyzed this film multiple times, along with representatives from GEP and Forum Parawissenschaften. They found no evidence of a UFO, only the launching rocket with its exhaust plume. The article states that any depiction of a flying saucer, especially one enhanced by computer animation as seen on TV, is absent from the original film.

Leutnant Robert Jacobs and the Misrepresentation of Evidence

Leutnant Robert Jacobs, the key witness in the 'Big Sur' case, is identified as part of Steven Greer's group. In a Washington D.C. press conference in 2002, Jacobs reportedly maintained that the film was still-secret film clearly showed a flying saucer. The article expresses disbelief at this claim, attributing it to short-term memory loss or misrepresentation.

Skepticism and the 'Swamp Gas' Explanation

The 'Sightings' episode featuring the 'Big Sur' incident was broadcast in 1998, with Jacobs as the main witness. The article suggests that 'coincidence' is a tool for UFO skeptics. It also references an article by Harald Lutz in 'Journal für UFO-Forschung' (2/2003) proposing a UFO surveillance system due to a lack of data in many cases. Lutz's approach is described as 'automaton ufology,' focusing on the phenomenon's potential to disrupt electrical devices and radio communications, rather than on human witnesses.

Critiques of Lutz's Approach and UFOlogy

The article questions Lutz's assertion that there are no known Identified Flying Objects (IFOs) capable of causing such anomalous effects. It points out that misinterpretations, such as mistaking the planet Venus for a UFO, have occurred. The Mannheim incident of January 11, 1987, where an electrical heater failed, is cited as an example of a potential misattributed UFO effect.

The Nature of Ignorance and Self-Deception in UFOlogy

The author concludes by stating that despite extensive research, they have not come closer to understanding exotic UFO phenomena. They emphasize that ignorance and superstition create a dangerous mix, leading to severe perceptual distortions and a form of 'brainwashing' driven by self-deception and ufological promoters with vested interests. The article suggests that UFOlogy has a 'political' and psychological dimension, attracting various individuals, some of whom repeatedly try to reinvent the wheel instead of engaging with factual research.

The 'Rebels' of the UFO Scene

True debate between UFO enthusiasts and skeptics is rare, despite opportunities offered by skeptics. This lack of direct engagement is noted as being absent in the mainstream UFO press, but present among the hard-to-find 'rebels' of the scene, who are often the ones who are most informed.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of CENAP REPORT adopts a critical and skeptical stance towards many aspects of UFOlogy, particularly concerning sensationalism, financial motivations, and the uncritical acceptance of evidence, especially when influenced by hypnosis or misinterpretation. The editorial emphasizes the importance of rigorous investigation and critical thinking, contrasting it with what it perceives as self-deception and the promotion of 'old ideas' in new packaging within the UFO community. The magazine appears to favor a scientific and evidence-based approach, questioning anecdotal evidence and highlighting instances of misidentification or manipulation.

Title: CENAP REPORT
Issue: Nr. 285
Date: Juli 2003

This issue of CENAP REPORT focuses on the television documentary "Die UFO-Story" aired by NDR, which delves into the history of UFO sightings, particularly in America, starting from 1947. The report analyzes the documentary's content, its approach to historical cases, and the broader context of UFOlogy.

"Die UFO-Story": A TV Documentary Review

The article begins by acknowledging the "UFO-Glorienpresse" (UFO glory press) and the reasons behind it, suggesting that UFO promoters often face criticism due to their sensationalist misrepresentations and failures. The author states that they have learned this through experience and are presenting themselves as someone who understands UFOlogy, not for ideological reasons.

The core question addressed is "UFO or Not-UFO?" The author expresses a lack of hope for a genuine UFO phenomenon beyond our comprehension but remains open to being surprised.

"UFOS MAL WIEDER IM TV" (UFOs Again on TV)

The main focus is a 45-minute TV documentary titled "Die UFO-Story," broadcast by NDR in the early morning hours of December 10, 2002. This documentary, described as being "shamefully hidden from the public," explored the origins of UFO sightings in America from 1947 onwards. It was produced by Multimedia Film- und Fernsehproduktion GmbH for WDR, NDR, and MDR.

The Avrocar and Early Sightings

The film starts with the famous AVRO disc, detailing the construction of a "flying saucer" commissioned by the US Air Force by a Canadian aviation firm, AVRO. This "hovercraft-car" was built until 1960 but failed to live up to the idea of a "flying saucer" as a terrestrial aircraft with helicopter-like properties. It was difficult to steer, wobbly, and barely lifted off the ground.

The documentary then returns to the American West and the events of 1947. It reconstructs the experience of private pilot Kenneth Arnold, who sighted strange flying objects over Mt. Rainier near Mineral, Washington. The film interviews Richard Hensley, the current editor-in-chief of The East Oregonian, who believes Arnold's "saucers" were merely experimental aircraft. The report notes that "the strangest objects" had been flying over the American West for years prior.

Experimental Aircraft and Early Aviation

Footage of John Northrop's YB-49 is shown, highlighting revolutionary prototypes of the US Air Force using flying wing technology, similar to modern "stealth bombers." These were described as objects from outer space or science fiction films, but the report clarifies they were of earthly origin, equipped with jet engines.

USAF film material from that era is presented, which amazes modern viewers. The report speculates on how people at the time, accustomed to propeller planes, reacted to the sudden introduction of the jet age and new aerodynamic aircraft designs. The documentary's creators researched and compiled this information to produce a program unlike typical German television offerings on UFOs, comparing its quality to the ZDF Discovery series.

In contrast, the NDR's 1994 "UFO-Reportage" ("UFOs - And they exist") is criticized for being a prime-time ARD broadcast that "largely fooled" nearly 8 million viewers. "Die UFO-Story," however, is praised for its calm presentation, avoiding flashy special effects and misleading computer animations used by shows aiming to compete with Steven Spielberg or commercial channels.

The documentary is described as quiet, allowing historical footage and contemporary observers and commentators to speak. It is considered soothing for the hectic modern era, though perhaps boring for younger viewers.

Historical Context and Analysis

The film also includes contributions from American television from the early days of UFOs and the debate surrounding them. Images of Dryden aircraft with novel wing technology are shown.

The author, who considers himself a UFO phenomenon historian, applauds the documentary for going beyond the surface and delving into the underground. He notes that in the Roswell case, storytellers were presented, and the events in the New Mexico desert involving the military were explored. Despite being familiar with numerous German and international UFO documentaries, the author was surprised by how effectively Unterburg retrieved historical information, a feat that other "UFO documentary producers" failed to achieve in capturing the true zeitgeist of the era. A film from 1944 from Antwerp is also shown, depicting what appears to be a glowing disc.

The Case of Rick Mueller and Dick Suter

The report then introduces private pilot Rick Mueller, who claims to have seen many "UFOs" near Mt. Rainier in recent times, but states they were "nothing special, I just didn't know them." He believes they were not alien spacecraft but rather "absolutely cool stuff" built by the American government. Mueller is also convinced that Arnold's sightings were military aircraft, partly because Arnold himself referred to them as unknown aircraft.

Dick Suter, a resident of Mineral, Washington, recalls that during the time of Arnold's sighting, people in the area were startled by the first jet planes from McCord Field. These planes were particularly noticeable due to their polished aluminum hulls, which reflected sunlight intensely. Suter explains that this reflection, when the object was at a specific angle to the sun, created a brief, bright flash, similar to how Arnold described it. This marked a transition in aviation from propeller planes to jet aircraft, significantly altering the perception of these objects.

The Shift to Jet Technology and Roswell

The transition from propeller planes to jet aircraft represented a drastic change in aviation and the perception of flying objects. The dynamics of flight suddenly appeared different, a "quantum leap." It was during this era that "flying saucers" began to appear, coincidentally in areas where new aircraft were being flown. Roswell, for instance, was coincidentally located in a zone where the US military was conducting extensive secret tests and experiments with rockets and new aircraft. The desolate landscape also contributed to the release of fantasies.

A photograph depicts German aircraft development before World War II.

The "Flying Saucer" Craze and Tillman's Skepticism

The nation gradually fell into a "persecution mania," with country songs about "Flying Saucers" playing on the radio. Arnold recounted his observation to his friend Jack Tillman in Oregon. Tillman, now over 50 years later, still doubts that his former friend saw extraterrestrial objects. He states, "I don't want to call Ken a liar, but I still don't believe his story." Tillman offers a reflective and ironic closing comment: "The history of UFOs remains unsolved. Who knows what's up there. The sky is full of wonders - and the earth is full of stories." The documentary is credited with excellently portraying this sentiment in its calm manner. However, the supposedly fantastic phenomena, centered around two significant core events for the "flying saucer" myth (Arnold and Roswell), had their teeth removed, leaving only fantastic stories.

The report recalls a documentary about the flying objects of that era shown on pay-TV on April 8, 2001, suggesting that the creators of "Die UFO-Story" might have been influenced by it.

MUFON Perspectives

The documentary features MUFON State Directors, considered significant figures in the American UFO field. Ike Bishop from MUFON-Idaho, speaking from his armchair, states: "The UFO phenomenon has changed a lot in recent years."

Bishop presents a sketch based on Arnold's own accounts of the sighting, emphasizing its significance for the camera. The report questions the reliability of such illustrations, noting that they may not reflect reality or might only subtly do so. Bishop's claims that light points in formation were seen in the night sky are challenged, with the report suggesting that while light points might be accurate, the context of the night sky is not. Bishop's assertion that these were not near Arnold's plane but distant is also questioned. The report dismisses Bishop's explanation that most UFO reports come from areas with "military exercises, war, or large police operations" as mere speculation, despite being presented as findings from MUFON "investigations."

Bishops's ideology is characterized as: "If you see a UFO or something else like that, don't think it was an airplane or similar. Start your own investigation, dig, look for a solution - the answer will surprise you. And: Keep looking up." The underlying message is "Everything is UFO, nothing else."

Another MUFON State Director, Dr. Donald Burleson from New Mexico, heads a lab at the University of Roswell and also operates from his living room couch. His "expert assessment" is that he moved to Roswell six years ago with his wife "because if you are interested in UFOs, you have to live here."

Scientific Rigor vs. Blind Faith

The report questions whether this is scientifically valuable or merely the testimony of a "blindly believing UFO fan." Burleson claims to have had a "scientifically qualified" UFO sighting at the age of five on July 4, 1947, the night of the "Roswell crash," about 300 miles away. For two seconds, a luminous object shot across the sky, and he insists "it was not a balloon." The report points out the discrepancy that the "UFO debris" was found by William Brazel on June 14, 1947, but only reported on July 4. The sighting by the Wilmot couple occurred shortly before 10 p.m. on that night, where they saw a glowing object race across the sky. Subsequent testimonies suggest similar sightings in the summer of 1947. The report suggests these descriptions sound like a fireball or bolide, which would be obvious to any expert.

Conclusion on UFOlogy

The article concludes that in UFOlogy, everything is "perfect" only when one closes their eyes to reality. It also criticizes the tendency to ignore the obvious.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO documentaries, the historical analysis of key UFO cases like Kenneth Arnold's sighting and the Roswell incident, and the critique of UFOlogy as a field. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards sensationalist claims, favoring a more grounded, scientific, and historical approach, while acknowledging the enduring fascination with unexplained aerial phenomena. The report emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between genuine mysteries and misinterpretations, often attributing sightings to experimental aircraft or natural phenomena.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, dated July 2003 (Nr. 285), delves into the media's portrayal of UFO phenomena, with a particular focus on the ARD documentary "Die UFO-Story" which aired on May 1, 2003. The author expresses initial surprise that ARD would broadcast such a program, given their perceived retreat from the UFO topic since a 1994 show. The report analyzes the pre-broadcast media coverage, including articles in "Die Welt" and "Hamburger Abendblatt," and the subsequent reactions from viewers and online forums.

ARD Documentary "Die UFO-Story"

The central piece of this issue is a critical review of the ARD documentary "Die UFO-Story." The author notes that the documentary was presented as an exploration of "the creation of a rumor" with the subtitle "Myth or Reality?". Media previews highlighted its investigation into the Roswell incident, with the film's author, Matthias Unterburg, reportedly researching the topic on-site in Roswell, New Mexico. However, initial reactions from online forums like "Alien.De-Forum" were mixed to negative. Some viewers found the documentary to be "very superficial," "confusingly narrated," and lacking in genuine UFO footage, preferring "Star Wars" instead. Others criticized it as a "bad documentary," particularly the Roswell segment, deeming it "humbug" compared to better-researched documentaries.

Media Coverage and Critical Reception

"Die Welt" featured an article on April 29, 2003, titled "Where the Flying Saucers Fly," written by the film's author, Matthias Unterburg. The "Hamburger Abendblatt" on April 30, 2003, posed the question, "Are Flying Saucers of Earthly Origin?" The newspaper "BILD" listed the report as a TV tip, stating, "The true background. In Roswell, New Mexico, a UFO is said to have crashed in 1947. Matthias Unterburg researched on-site – and actually found strange flying objects."

Online forum discussions revealed a range of opinions. "Alien.De-Profi" Dietmar Sch. anticipated it would be "something to chuckle about, depending on how stupid the piece was cut together." "Area 51 Arbeiter" called it a "typical documentary" and expressed a desire for "real UFO videos." A "Believer" described it as "very superficial" and "very confusingly told." A user named "Seehas" stated, "Bad documentary, especially the Roswell part was super bad. There have already been some good documentaries about Roswell, so such humbug really stands out." Another user, who had hoped for a documentary similar to a previous ARD film about alien abductions, felt this one was "definitely the wrong broadcast" and gave a "false picture of the matter."

Ratings and Audience Figures

The article provides viewership data for the broadcast. The ZDF "heute journal" was the most-watched program with 5.04 million viewers and a 17% market share. "Star Wars" on Pro7 followed with 3.34 million viewers. The ARD "UFO-Story" secured third place with 3.32 million viewers and an 11.8% market share, which the author considers a respectable performance, especially considering it aired against strong competition.

Reactions from the Anomalistics Community

Reactions from various email lists, particularly the "Gesellschaft für Anomalistik (GfA)," are detailed. Hartmut Alt, after watching two-thirds of the program, switched it off, finding it "dumb, contrived, and embarrassingly naive." He argued that the Roswell case is one of the best-researched UFO incidents and that the explanations involving a weather balloon or satellite were "more than stupid." Ingbert Jüdt commented that the documentary only superficially addressed Roswell and ended its timeframe at Project Blue Book, failing to acknowledge the ongoing conflict between Air Force, debunks, and UFOlogists. The author of the report found these arguments to be "kindergarten-like" and reminiscent of "hardcore UFOlogy" discussions.

Specific Criticisms of the Documentary's Content

A significant point of contention was the documentary's claim that the Roswell crash was "desperately" explained as a satellite reentry, which the author asserts is incorrect and "completely unfounded." The author felt unsupported in this critique, facing personal attacks from others in the discussion.

Alternative Explanations and Historical Context

Jochen Ickinger, described as the "UFO-Man" at GfA, found the documentary "worth watching" in comparison to sensationalist shows like "UFOs - And They Exist." He noted that the documentary's focus on Arnold and Roswell was understandable given their historical prominence. He highlighted the historical footage as particularly noteworthy. The author suggests that the "Nurflügler" (flying wing) phenomenon could explain the Arnold sighting, followed by the "Schwindel-Hypothese" (hoax hypothesis). The Roswell case, while heavily documented, is questioned regarding its research quality.

Other UFO Media and Programs

The report also touches upon other UFO-related media. It mentions a book by Uli Thieme, "Roswell - ein Mythos stürzt ab," as a well-researched account of the Roswell incident. The author notes a lack of significant media reviews for the ARD documentary, suggesting the topic might be "out of fashion." The article references a May 3rd piece in the "Hamburger Abendblatt" describing the documentary as "thin" and noting that Matthias Unterburg's search for clarification on the UFO stories yielded little new information, relying on familiar accounts from farmers, pilots, and experts.

Sci-Fi Channel's "UFO" Programming

The issue also discusses the Sci-Fi Channel's programming strategy, which included a block of independently produced documentaries on "unexplained phenomena." The author notes that the channel aimed for "national attention" by giving newcomers a chance and that the content was "controversial" and produced cheaply for entertainment value. The "Sci-Fi-Originals" series, including "Declassified: The UFO Chronicles" and "Alien Gods," is reviewed. "The UFO Chronicles" is described as a re-edited version of older material, while "Alien Gods" featured skeptic Robert Sheaffer discussing the origins of the term "Flying Saucer" and the Roswell legend. The author found "Alien Gods" to be "breathtakingly boring" and noted several factual inaccuracies, such as the claim that Project Blue Book was organized to cover up the Roswell incident.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the critical examination of how UFO phenomena are presented in the media. The author exhibits a skeptical but open-minded approach, distinguishing between sensationalism and genuine research. There is a clear critique of documentaries that are perceived as superficial, poorly researched, or biased. The editorial stance appears to favor critical analysis and a search for verifiable evidence, while acknowledging the public's enduring fascination with UFOs and related mysteries. The author expresses frustration with what they perceive as a lack of rigor in some media portrayals and the tendency for discussions to devolve into personal attacks rather than substantive debate.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, number 285, dated July 2003, delves into the complex world of UFO phenomena and alien encounters. The content appears to be a critical analysis of various claims, media portrayals, and historical incidents related to unidentified flying objects and extraterrestrial life.

Content Analysis

The magazine dedicates significant attention to media representations of UFOs. It critiques television talk shows, such as RTL's 'Oliver Geißen-Show,' which featured discussions on aliens. The report highlights the skepticism surrounding such programs, questioning the authenticity of guests and the sensationalism often employed. The coverage includes a segment on the UFO sighting phenomenon, specifically analyzing daylight flying saucer footage from Carol Monroe, and questioning whether the audience is being deceived.

Historical UFO cases are revisited, including the MJ-12 and Roswell incidents, which are framed within the context of early 1990s ufology. The report also touches upon the UFO wave in Mexico on July 11, 1991, citing ufological popularizer Sean David Morton's claims of millions witnessing flying saucers.

The issue explores various theories and perspectives on UFOs. It discusses the historical context of sightings, dating back to biblical times, and examines ancient cave paintings and desert figures (like the Nazca lines and the 'Marsgott' figure from Tassili N'ajjer) as potential evidence of extraterrestrial visitation. The report contrasts the belief in aliens with skepticism, referencing Paul Kurtz, founder of CSICOP, who views ufology as a 'mythology of the space age.'

Specific incidents are detailed, such as the Roswell crash in 1947, where military explanations evolved from a recovered flying saucer to a weather balloon. The 'Kaspisches Monster' incident from the 1980s is explained as the Soviet Ekranoplan A-90 Orljonok, a high-speed aircraft.

The magazine also touches upon the SETI project and the Drake Formula, a theoretical tool for estimating the number of advanced civilizations. It briefly mentions the controversial 'Nazi UFOs' and 'Men in Black' theories, linking them to conspiracy narratives.

Critiques are made of media coverage, with the MDR's 'lexi-tv' program being cited for failing to adequately address the UFO topic despite a dedicated hour. The issue also mentions contact persons, the Resslers, who claimed aliens would land in their village.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

A recurring theme is the critical examination of UFO claims and media coverage, often highlighting skepticism and the potential for deception or misinterpretation. The editorial stance appears to be one of cautious inquiry, questioning sensationalism and seeking rational explanations, while acknowledging the enduring fascination with the unknown. The magazine seems to lean towards debunking or at least questioning many of the more extraordinary claims, suggesting that many phenomena can be explained by terrestrial technology or misidentification.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, dated July 2003, focuses on UFOs in US television programming and critically analyzes media coverage and UFOlogy. The publication, originating from Germany, presents a skeptical viewpoint on many UFO claims and the way they are presented in the media.

Article 1: Media Analysis and UFOlogists

The issue begins by discussing Mario Grünwald, a self-proclaimed UFOlogist from Magdeburg who has been active for ten years, even appearing on TV in an MIB-like outfit. Grünwald, formerly associated with MUFON-CES, is no longer on their member list. He views UFO research as one of the 'last adventures.' However, he does not believe in aliens, instead positing that the German Luftwaffe experimented with 'flying discs' in the 1940s, a theory he considers insider knowledge. He suggests this technology was perfected in the USA in the 1950s (referencing the AVRO-Car) and that American forces are now using manned flying saucers about 30 meters in diameter. One witness account mentioned a UFO firing laser beams over a village, prompting a researcher to use a mine detector to search the field. The report notes that this alone would be a '10-minute fun number' for Schmidt.

The article then shifts to Erich von Däniken, described as a writer and Utopist, who is presented as the 'DEM German-speaking UFO researcher.' The author suggests von Däniken doesn't quite fit the mainstream media mold, though he claims not to be a 'UFO man' and denies ever seeing a UFO. Von Däniken's focus is on connecting ancient myths and UFO phenomena, suggesting that mythological figures are manifesting themselves in modern UFO sightings. The report criticizes the media's portrayal of von Däniken as a new 'Jules Verne' or visionary, deeming it exaggerated. It argues that his theories about interstellar travel are not original but follow established science fiction tropes. The author quotes von Däniken saying, 'Inzwischen kann man es machen und man weiß auch wie...' ('In the meantime, one can do it and one knows how...'), but points out that at the time of the broadcast, travel was only between planets like Earth and Mars, not stars, and interstellar travel capabilities were unknown. Despite not being a UFO expert, von Däniken boldly claims there is now 'convincing, tangible evidence' that UFOs are back.

Article 2: UFO Skeptics and Crop Circles

The report continues by discussing 'UFO opponents' who, it claims, have a single mission: to refute Däniken's writings and prove there are no extraterrestrials on Earth. Robert Habersack, a 20-year-old GEP member from Berlin, is identified as one such skeptic. He claims to read pro-UFO literature to understand the 'enemy,' akin to military strategy. The article then discusses crop circles, mentioning a report about a Hessian 'crop circle researcher' named Rolf Köcher who claimed they were created by 'spiritual energy.' The report dismisses this, noting that the sender then turned to the Astrophysical Institute at the University of Jena to present 'planet hunters,' which the author feels misses the point.

Finally, the segment touches on Ilse Schmitz from Bottrop, who records messages from aliens via tape recorder, claiming to communicate with her deceased husband in the afterlife. The report notes that her messages from the 'beyond' are as incomprehensible as those from 'above,' comparing it to a 'talking bird.' The article mentions a GfK rating of 80,000 viewers and a 7.5% market share for the broadcast.

Article 3: Email Exchange and Proof

A UFO fan named 'Archy' sends an email to the author, titled 'Proof of Nothing!', accusing the author of being an 'intelligent giant' who tries to prove UFOs don't exist. Archy argues that one cannot prove something does not exist. The author responds, seeking clarification, but receives a vague, 'pseudo-intellectual' reply. Archy claims to be a neutral observer seeking information, acknowledging some charlatans and believers in the UFO scene.

The author then engages in a philosophical discussion about proof, using the examples of 'rocket worms' and 'Nessie.' He argues that one can only prove the existence of something that exists, not the non-existence of something. He quotes Voltaire: 'Learning stupidity is the hardest of all lessons.' Jörg Böhme, in the CENAP forum, clarifies that the goal is not to prove UFOs don't exist, but that no UFO case definitively proves extraterrestrial visitation. He also quotes Voltaire: 'The more a stupidity is repeated, the more it takes on the appearance of intelligence.'

Article 4: Roswell Anniversary: CNN and Larry King Live

This section focuses on a Larry King Live talk show on CNN International that aired on July 2, 2003, discussing the 56th anniversary of the Roswell incident and the question of UFO existence. The show claimed to feature 'living eyewitnesses' to the event that 'started it all.' The report criticizes this premise, stating that equating Roswell with 'how it all began' is strange, though it acknowledges Roswell's significance in American pop culture, largely driven by TV.

The author argues that the Ken Arnold sighting, not Roswell, is the event that truly marked the beginning of UFO sightings. The report asserts that the Roswell 'object' was not extraterrestrial but rather 'a pile of junk' found by farmhand Mac Brazel on June 14, 1947. Brazel reportedly delivered the debris to the Sheriff's office on July 4, 1947, after hearing about a cash reward for evidence of 'flying saucers.' The report cites the Roswell Daily News as its source, stating that Brazel found a large quantity of foil-like material held together by tape and stabilized by balsa wood sticks. This detail, the report claims, is often omitted by UFOlogists because it makes the story 'banal' and does not suggest spaceship construction material or bodies.

Article 5: Further Roswell Accounts and Media Manipulation

The report continues its critique of the Larry King Live show, noting the appearance of Glenn Dennis, described as a 'long-convicted liar,' who discussed the USAF ordering 'small children's coffins.' The show also featured ex-PIO Walter Haut, who confirmed the Roswell Daily News headline about a 'flying disc find' but denied seeing the object or aliens himself, stating he was relaying information from his superior. Haut admitted that General Ramey later informed him that the object was merely the remnants of a weather balloon. Dennis also denied that the USAF ordered 'small children's coffins.'

Nancy Johnson, whose father allegedly oversaw security during the cleanup of the Roswell debris field, is also featured. She claims her knowledge comes mainly from her deceased older sister and believes 'something must have happened.' Jesse Marcell Jr. recounts his father showing him the debris, which he perceived as 'plastic' and 'unusual.' UFO researcher Don Schmitt is presented as a former 'Co-Director' of the Hynek Center for UFO Studies, but the report labels him a liar. Schmitt is accused of giving evasive answers and falsely claiming that most UFO sightings in 1947 occurred around Roswell Air Field, and of fabricating stories about 'flying saucers' over the White House in 1952.

The report identifies Schmitt as a 'chatterbox' and notes his previous role at the Sci-Fi Channel when they covered the Roswell story. It suggests that the 'extreme level of pressure on witnesses by the government' and the discrepancy between USAF test dummies and reported 'aliens' were key points for him. The author criticizes the rapid shift from a 'flying disc' report to a 'weather balloon' explanation as a potential cover-up, but argues that such hasty sensationalism is common in UFO reporting and often turns out to be mundane.

Dr. William Doleman is mentioned as having conducted an archaeological investigation near one of the Roswell 'crash sites' in September 2002, based on Don Schmitt's advice. He reportedly confessed to the witness testimonies.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are media criticism, particularly concerning UFO coverage on television, and a strong skeptical stance towards UFOlogy and its proponents. The editorial stance is to debunk sensational claims, emphasize the lack of concrete evidence for extraterrestrial visitation, and highlight the role of misinterpretation, sensationalism, and potential deception in UFO narratives. The report advocates for a rational, evidence-based approach, contrasting it with what it perceives as the 'pseudo-intellectual' and 'fantastical' elements prevalent in the UFO community. The issue also emphasizes the importance of historical accuracy, as seen in its detailed breakdown of the Roswell incident.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, dated July 2003, delves into the persistent public interest in UFOs and related phenomena, examining how these topics are portrayed and commercialized in the media. The report critically analyzes the role of television series, surveys, and public relations efforts in shaping perceptions of UFOs and government transparency.

Roswell and Media Coverage

The report begins by discussing the enduring fascination with the Roswell incident, noting that the International UFO Museum in Roswell continues to attract visitors. It touches upon the interviews with individuals connected to the event, including Julie Shuster, daughter of Walter Haut, who now heads the museum. The article questions the authenticity of some accounts, suggesting that 'storytellers' and 'cosmic fantasies' can obscure the truth.

It highlights the influence of media, particularly the Sci Fi Channel, in reviving interest in UFOs. The launch of Steven Spielberg's 20-hour TV series 'Taken' in December 2002 is presented as a significant event that brought UFO themes to the forefront. The report notes that the series, while fictional, draws heavily on popular UFO folklore, including the Roswell crash.

UFO Survey and Government Secrecy

A key focus is a survey commissioned by the Sci Fi Channel and conducted by RoperASW. The survey revealed that a substantial majority of Americans believe the US government is not fully disclosing information about UFO activities and extraterrestrial life. Specifically, 72% of those surveyed believed the government withholds information about UFO activities, and 68% believed it knows more about alien life than it admits. The report observes that younger demographics are more convinced of government secrecy.

John Podesta and the 'Coalition for Freedom of Information'

The article introduces John Podesta, former White House Chief of Staff under President Clinton, as a new player in the UFO discourse. Podesta, now a teacher and environmental activist, is co-founder of the 'Coalition for Freedom of Information' (CFI). His current objective is to gain access to classified government documents concerning UFOs. The report mentions that CFI's agenda is broad, but unidentified aerial phenomena are among its interests. It notes that Podesta's efforts are framed as a pursuit of information rather than a belief in ufological alien theories.

Historical Incidents and Government Projects

The report revisits historical UFO-related incidents, including the Kecksburg incident of December 5, 1965, where a large fireball was observed, followed by the landing and subsequent removal of an object by military personnel. It mentions the involvement of 'Project Moon Dust' and 'Operation Blue Fly' in such recovery operations, noting that the Pentagon maintains silence on their activities. Podesta's interest is specifically directed towards the recovery of unknown objects that have fallen from the sky.

Media Commercialization and 'Disclosure'

The article criticizes the commercialization of UFO topics by the media, suggesting that the 'urban legends' surrounding UFOs are exploited for profit. It argues that 'The X-Files,' while popular, is based on Hollywood fantasies and can lead to unrealistic expectations. The report points out that the US government has declassified thousands of pages of UFO research, such as Project Blue Book, and that agencies like the FBI, CIA, and NSA have released previously sealed files.

A symposium sponsored by the Sci Fi Channel at George Washington University in November 2002, titled 'Interstellar Travel and Unidentified Aerial Phenomena: Science Fiction or Science Fact?', is discussed. The event, attended by UFO proponents like Richard Henry and John Callahan, is seen as an attempt to generate publicity for the TV series 'Taken.' The report quotes UFO researcher Richard Hall's observation about the sparse attendance, questioning the impact of such events.

It is revealed that Greer was approached by a PR firm to promote 'Taken' by linking it to his 'Disclosure Project.' However, negotiations failed because Greer reportedly insisted that his project, not the TV series, should be the primary focus. The article concludes that this situation exemplifies pure Hollywood commercialism, where 'Taken' is used as a promotional vehicle for 'Disclosure.'

Conclusion and Editorial Stance

The report suggests that the decline of public interest in UFOs is being countered by media projects that are seen as desperate attempts to revive the topic. The 'secret of Kecksburg' is dismissed as old news, with the recovered object identified as a Russian satellite reentry. The article advises individuals like Podesta to first inform themselves before making public statements, implying that a thorough understanding would reveal that many of these UFO claims are not new.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the intersection of UFO phenomena with media, government secrecy, and commercial interests. The editorial stance appears critical of sensationalism and commercial exploitation of UFO topics, advocating for factual investigation and transparency. It suggests that while public interest remains, much of the current discourse is driven by entertainment and profit rather than genuine disclosure of unknown phenomena. The report emphasizes that historical government UFO research is available and that many claims are not new, urging a more informed approach to the subject.

Title: CENAP REPORT
Issue: Nr. 285
Date: Juli 2003

This issue of the CENAP REPORT focuses on media coverage of UFO phenomena, specifically a documentary sponsored by the Sci Fi Channel concerning the Roswell incident and Steven Spielberg's associated TV series 'Taken.' The report critically examines the journalistic merit and entertainment value of these productions.

Sci Fi-Channel's Roswell Investigation

The report details a Sci Fi Channel production titled "The Roswell Crash: Startling New Evidence," which featured an archaeological investigation of the alleged 1947 UFO crash site in New Mexico. This documentary was presented as a "groundbreaking scientific investigation" and was hosted by Bryant Gumbel. The investigation aimed to determine if an extraterrestrial spacecraft had crashed there, utilizing modern forensic methods. The report notes that the documentary was produced by Melissa Jo Peltier of MPH Entertainment and executive produced by James Romanovich of Platinium Media, Inc. It was directly linked to Steven Spielberg's new Sci Fi series "Taken," which premiered in early December and depicted a family history starting with the Roswell crash and ending with modern UFO abductions.

The report suggests that the program was an attempt to bring the UFO phenomenon back to the attention of science, Congress, and the media. It highlights that archaeologists were tasked with re-examining the crash site. However, the report also presents the widely accepted explanation that the crashed object was a top-secret high-altitude balloon used for military reconnaissance (espionage) as part of Project MOGUL. It posits that UFO enthusiasts resist this explanation because it removes their "mental toy."

Dr. Bill Doleman, a contract archaeologist from the University of New Mexico specializing in environmental analysis and geoarchaeology, was involved in the Sci Fi Channel's investigation. He participated in an internet chat on October 30, 2002, where only five participants indicated the level of interest in the topic. Doleman admitted he was not a Roswell expert or ufologist and relied on UFOlogists for information regarding the "Initial Impact Side" (IIS) and the "Final Crash Side" (FCS). He noted that no impact traces or UFO traces were found on the surface, and that the investigation used electromagnetic conductivity and metal detection technology, along with aerial photographs from 1946 and 1954, to search for buried material.

Media Criticism of the Roswell Documentary

TV critic John Levesque of the "Seattle Post-Intelligencer" expressed disappointment with the Sci Fi Channel's "The Roswell Crash: Starling New Evidence," finding that too much was promised and too little delivered. Levesque described the Roswell theme as "tired and exhausted" and the documentary as "appallingly bad" and a "waste of time." He criticized the show for artificially stretching a few minutes of meaningful content into two hours, lacking genuine journalism, and resembling a carnival snake oil salesman. Levesque stated that anything presented as "new" had long been known and shown on US television countless times. The "great surprise" from the archaeological investigation was that there was none. However, moderator Bryant Gumbel made a claim that "parts and artifacts of the Roswell crash are packed in bags in a safe at the Roswell Wells Fargo Bank," awaiting release for laboratory examination.

Levesque felt that moderator Gumbel was underutilized, merely needing to appear on camera to give the show a "serious" appearance. The report questions whether a TV channel with "Fiction" in its name can handle "Facts." It expresses hope that Spielberg's "Taken" series will succeed and that Spielberg will return to his earlier form, like in the blockbuster film "Close Encounters of the Third Kind."

Steven Spielberg's TV Series 'Taken'

The issue also extensively covers Steven Spielberg's 20-hour TV miniseries "Taken" (officially titled "Steven Spielberg Presents Taken"). The series, divided into ten 2-hour episodes, aired daily over two weeks. Spielberg served as executive producer. The report mentions that the HBO series "Band of Brothers," also co-produced by Spielberg and Tom Hanks, is available on video and dramatizes World War II in a similar style to "Saving Private Ryan."

"Taken" chronicles the development of three families over four generations, spanning 60 years from World War II to the present day. It explores UFO mythology, including Foo Fighters, the Roswell crash, and modern UFO abductions. The screenplay was written by Leslie Bohem, who also wrote the scripts for the films "Daylight" and "Dante's Peak." Spielberg himself only supervised the project and secured funding, with the series costing approximately $40 million. "Taken" is noted as the longest TV miniseries to date. Bohem commented on his story, stating that if it were all true, it would be terrifying, and if it were not true, it would be even more unbelievable.

The premiere episode was directed by Tobe Hooper, known for "Poltergeist." Hooper cast 300 actors, with only a few deemed credible enough to carry the series. He described the project as a significant risk, comparing it to jumping with a parachute. The production emphasized quality and optical special effects, aiming to resemble a major feature film. A notable aspect is the adaptation of the visual style to match each historical era depicted in the series.

The report notes that the actors are replaced over time, contributing to a unique effect. Realism was a priority for the character-driven storyline, aiming to differentiate itself from the tone of "The X-Files" by Chris Carter, with a "humanistic touch." The "government conspiracy" element, similar to "The X-Files," was reportedly removed, with "Taken" suggesting the "government" is overwhelmed by the UFO phenomenon and the experiences of UFO experiencers.

Tom Shales of "The Washington Post" praised "Taken" as "mammoth, imaginative and thrilling," calling it the most ambitious sci-fi epic ever produced for cable TV. He compared its quality to the renowned series "Roots" and described "Taken" as a fascinating and fantastic adventure that paints a unique panorama of America in the latter half of the 20th century.

"Taken" was a significant success for the Sci Fi Channel, with the pilot episode setting a ratings record, reportedly reaching around 5 million viewers. The report acknowledges that this is impressive for a niche channel, but details on the ongoing series' ratings are not publicly available, with network executives remaining discreet.

Despite the critical reception, "Taken" performed well for the Sci Fi Channel. United Press International reported "Spielberg 'Taken' By Mini Response," highlighting the show's success. The report notes that Spielberg, known for "E.T." and "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," personally does not believe in alien abductions, viewing it as a "nice mythology, a good tale." The success of "Taken" is attributed not to extensive SFX scenes, but to its nature as a "family series full of dynamics and trauma," described as a "trauma drama."

Werner Walter's Review of 'Taken'

Werner Walter, a reviewer from Germany, expressed disappointment with "Taken" after watching the first four episodes. He felt that the series was artificially lengthened and resembled an "American family series." Walter described the series as uninspired and haphazardly assembled, lacking a certain "something." He found the blend of UFOlogical elements to be a "confused, wild jumble" from the American UFOlogy scene. Examples cited include Greys being green, shapeshifters, a Roswell spaceship resembling the one from "ID4," and cloaked bombers flying over Groom Lake in the mid-1950s. Groom Lake is depicted as the base where the Roswell spaceship was taken for study, and also as the secret headquarters of the Pentagon's Project Blue Book. The report mentions a character who is a mix of Bob Lazar and Dr. Mengele, and includes an alien autopsy. Project SIGN, a precursor to Blue Book, is mentioned as being shut down.

Walter concluded that "Taken" is partially made to resemble previous UFO-Roswell-Alien fictions, but is in some ways worse. He found the series to be uninspired and a "wildly overgrown" collection of UFOlogical elements, stating that it was not even "nice."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the intersection of media and UFO phenomena, the critical analysis of UFO-related television productions, and the enduring cultural fascination with the Roswell incident. The editorial stance appears to be skeptical of sensationalized media portrayals of UFOs, emphasizing the need for journalistic integrity and factual explanations, while acknowledging the entertainment value and cultural impact of such narratives. The report highlights the contrast between the popular mythology surrounding UFOs and the scientific or mundane explanations, suggesting that many enthusiasts resist the latter.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, number 285, dated July 2003, features a critical examination of science fiction concepts, particularly those from Star Trek, in relation to real-world physics. It also includes reports on astronomical phenomena such as unexpected meteor showers and a notable UFO sighting in Greece.

Article: 'TAKEN' - A Tired Rehash?

The first article reviews the TV series 'TAKEN', describing it as a series about alleged Maisfelder-Piktogrammen (crop circles), humans-alien-hybrids, and supermutants. The reviewer finds the series' special effects to be a 'family series' affair, lacking the excitement of a James Bond intro. While acknowledging a 'cool' opening sequence depicting a 1944 air combat with Foo Fighters helping US bombers against Nazi Germany and saving a bomber crew, the reviewer deems the rest of the series as 'tired US family series' fare. The theme is considered 'worn out,' even for fictional TV adaptations, drawing parallels to 'The X-Files.' The article concludes that the series offers nothing new for seasoned viewers and suggests that the European production 'NAPOLEON' is far superior and more interesting.

Article: Science Fiction is Not Science Fact - Star Trek's Great Ideas Under Scrutiny

This multi-part article, authored by Reiner Wisser, delves into the scientific plausibility of concepts presented in the popular science fiction series 'Star Trek.' The author begins by noting that while science fiction often promotes the idea of 'nothing is impossible,' even fictional concepts are bound by the laws of physics. The article argues that 'Star Trek' authors often use real physical theories as a basis, but then extend them beyond known limits, leading viewers to forget the actual constraints of the universe.

The Limits of Physics and Energy Requirements

The article questions the feasibility of interstellar travel as depicted in 'Star Trek.' It posits that the energy required to manipulate gravity for travel across the galaxy would likely exceed the total energy available within the galaxy. This is presented as a primary reason why most scientists find visits from highly advanced extraterrestrial civilizations improbable. The author dismisses the idea of aliens leaving behind metal objects or conducting abductions as insufficient justification for such an immense effort.

Warp Drive and the Dilemma of Faster-Than-Light Travel

While acknowledging that some might speculate about different physical laws in other parts of the universe, the article asserts that upon reaching our observable cosmos, these same laws would apply. Gene Roddenberry's invention of the warp drive is presented as a clever way to circumvent these laws, enabling faster-than-light travel by contracting space in front of the ship. However, the article highlights a significant dilemma: even with warp drive, the process of initiating it would require sending a signal through the space to be traversed. If a ship aims to travel a thousand light-years in one second, the signal would take a thousand years to reach its destination, meaning the 'countdown' to departure would be incredibly long.

The Steadfastness of Physics: The Falling Apple

To illustrate the unchanging nature of physics, the article uses the simple example of an apple falling from a tree. This phenomenon, governed by gravity, has been consistent for centuries and is expected to remain so. The author emphasizes that physics evolves through steady evolution, building upon existing knowledge, rather than through revolutionary leaps that discard previous understanding. Newton's laws, for instance, are expected to hold true for millions of years, regardless of future scientific discoveries.

The Impossibility of Beaming

The article also addresses the concept of 'beaming' (teleportation) from 'Star Trek.' It explains that for a person to be beamed, their approximately 10^28 atoms would need to be vaporized by temperatures exceeding one million times that of the sun's core, then transmitted and reassembled. This process would require more energy than humanity has ever produced and would necessitate circumventing the laws of quantum mechanics. The author suggests that while tangible holograms (like a Holodeck) might become animatable in the future, they would still lack substance.

The Practicality of the Communicator

Despite the fantastical nature of many 'Star Trek' technologies, the article notes that the personal communicator, analogous to a modern mobile phone (handy), has become a reality. This is attributed to utilizing existing physical laws rather than trying to overcome them.

The Challenge of Distinguishing Science from Fiction

The author concludes this section by stressing the importance of distinguishing between science and fiction. The greatest gift of science, according to the article, is the understanding that the universe is as it is, and that open-minded individuals accept this reality rather than constructing a universe that fits their desires. The article cites Lawrence M. Krauss, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Chase Western University, who states that truly open-minded people do not uncritically build a universe to match their theories and wishes.

News from Science: Unexpected Meteorites are Always to be Expected

This section reports on NASA's findings on June 27, 2003, regarding numerous previously unknown dust clouds in interplanetary space. It recalls a similar incident in 1967 when the Mariner 4 probe, en route to Mars, encountered an intense meteoroid shower that damaged the spacecraft and caused temporary disorientation. The article notes that this event, along with others, has made scientists aware of the unexpected dangers of space travel, including dust clouds originating from comets and asteroid collisions.

It mentions well-known meteor showers like the Perseids and Leonids but highlights the existence of other interplanetary dust clouds that can reach Earth. The report discusses the increasing concern at NASA about these phenomena, as they pose a risk to spacecraft. The loss of several 'mysteriously' disappeared planetary probes is speculated to be due to this 'dust grain bombardment.' The article also references a significant meteorite impact over Earth on June 27, 1998, which was not linked to known streams, and mentions NASA's identification of unusual meteorite activities in 1916, 1921, and 1927. The 'Southern Germany Fireball' of April 6, 2002, is cited as a more recent example.

News from Science: Foreign Object Over Greek Sky Causes Excitement

This report details a UFO sighting that occurred on the night of Friday, July 4, 2003, in Greece. Numerous regions reported seeing an unknown fiery object, described by witnesses as a large luminous sphere with a red front and a long light blue trail. The event caused widespread excitement, with hundreds of people contacting authorities. The Director of the Athens Planetarium, Dionysios Simopoulos, suggested it might have been a small meteorite or debris from an old satellite, downplaying the need for alarm. Further investigation, prompted by a Finnish UFO investigator, revealed that the phenomenon was observed not only in mainland Greece but also over the Ionian Islands and Albania.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently emphasizes the distinction between science fiction and scientific fact, urging readers to critically evaluate fantastical concepts against established physical laws. There is a clear editorial stance that promotes a rational, evidence-based approach to understanding the universe, cautioning against wishful thinking or uncritical acceptance of unproven theories. The reports on meteorites and the Greek UFO sighting serve to ground the discussion in real-world phenomena, while the 'Star Trek' analysis highlights the gap between imagination and scientific reality. The magazine appears to advocate for scientific rigor and a grounded perspective on unexplained phenomena.

Title: CENAP REPORT
Issue: 285
Date: July 2003

This issue of CENAP REPORT focuses on two main topics: a reported UFO sighting in Greece and the upcoming Cröffelbach UFO Forum in Germany.

UFO Sighting in Greece

The report details an incident in July 2003 where residents in the Zagorochoria region of Greece, specifically near the villages of Doliani and Kastanonas, reported a 'flaming object' landing. The local fire department was alerted but found no evidence of anything unusual. The African news agency IAfrica reported on this event with the headline "Greek firefighters alerted over 'fireball'".

Several witnesses described the phenomenon as a large, glowing ball that shed pieces and flew at a low altitude before disappearing over the horizon. One witness, Sotitis Spyridakis, the mayor of Zagori, described it as a large, luminous ball. Similar reports came from other locations, including a suburb of Athens, which led some to believe the object was not flying low but rather at a high altitude.

A Brazilian researcher provided a lead, suggesting that an AFP photo of the phenomenon existed. This photo was reportedly found and downloaded via Yahoo. The event is described as a truly impressive appearance of a cosmic visitor.

Cröffelbach UFO Forum 2003

The magazine also provides extensive information about the upcoming UFO-FORSCHER-TAGUNG (UFO Researchers' Conference) with seminar character, held in Cröffelbach, Germany, in 2002 (referencing the 2003 event). The event is scheduled for the weekend of October 4th and 5th, 2003, immediately following the October 3rd holiday.

Cröffelbach is located near Schwäbisch Hall in a scenic valley. The "UFO-Forum" is open to all serious UFO enthusiasts, UFOlogists, and UFO researchers. Notably, there are no conference fees for the sessions or workshops. Speakers and attendees cover their own travel and accommodation costs, highlighting an 'idealistic' approach in today's commercialized world.

Despite the lack of fees, the contributions are described as highly qualified, impressing attendees. The event is organized by Roland Gehardt from Heilbronn, who ensures a broad spectrum of topics relevant to UFO interest.

The forum thrives on discussion and debate, with ample time for Q&A sessions after each presentation to ensure participants leave satisfied. Opportunities for informal discussions are also available.

A special event on Saturday evening is the traditional "UFO-Start," involving the launch of a miniature hot-air balloon, which is said to impress new visitors and provide a genuine 'UFO feeling'. Seeing this object in the dark is described as an 'eye-opener'.

Preliminary Program for Saturday, October 4th, 2003:

• 14:00: Opening remarks and welcome by Event Coordinator Roland Gehardt.
• 14:15: "UFOs under the Crescent Moon" by Ferhat Talayhan, covering UFO sightings, organizations, and perceptions in Turkey.
• 15:15: "The Man Who Comes From the Future I" by Rudolf Henke, discussing the incredible stories of Johannes von Buttlar.
• 16:30: "The Man Who Comes From the Future II" by Rudolf Henke.
• 17:30: "The Digital UFO" by Norbert Eßer, focusing on evaluating digital photographs.
• 18:30: Dinner.
• 20:30: UFO-Start live: Miniature hot-air balloon launch and flight.
• 21:00: "Crop Circles - Riddles in a Mystical Landscape" by Harald Hoos & Florian Brunner, a multimedia presentation on field phenomena and modern belief communities.

Preliminary Program for Sunday, October 5th, 2003:

• 09:30: "The UFO Detective: X-Factor UFO Witness" by Jochen Ickinger, discussing witness interview methodology.
• 10:30: "The New Media" by Sebastian Krull, exploring how UFO topics are handled online.
• 11:15: "Giants in the Sky" by Hansjürgen Köhler, investigating large UFO phenomena.
• 12:00 (approx.): "UFO Research! UFO Research?" - Brainstorming session with all speakers and participants on the topic of private UFO phenomenon research, followed by closing remarks.
• 13:00: Lunch and conclusion.

The conference will be held at the Hotel Goldener Ochsen in Cröffelbach. Information on accommodation and registration can be found via email to [email protected] or by phone between 8 PM and 9 PM. Further details are available at http://www.alien.de under "Kurs Erde", with the program also available as a PDF from the organizer.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes UFO research and investigation, highlighting both unexplained phenomena and the community dedicated to studying them. The editorial stance appears to favor open discussion and the pursuit of knowledge, as evidenced by the emphasis on idealism and the lack of commercialization in the Cröffelbach UFO Forum. The publication aims to inform readers about significant UFO events and provide a platform for researchers and enthusiasts to connect and share findings.