CENAP Report - No 268

Magazine Overview

CENAP-REPORT, issue 268, dated December 21, 2000, is the fifth issue of the year 2000. The magazine, published by CENAP, is described as Germany's oldest and most comprehensive UFO journal. It aims to bring readers into the 21st century and celebrate the 25th year of CENAP's activities. The cover features a striking NASA photo of the Gemini XII capsule in orbit, with a small object outside the hatch identified as a 'UFO' captured incidentally by the camera. The issue includes a table of contents listing various articles on UFO cases, NASA and outer-space UFOs, Russian UFO research, astronomical phenomena, and news from Germany and abroad.

Editorial Stance and Key Articles

The editorial stance, as articulated by Werner Walter, is one of critical skepticism towards sensationalism and unfounded claims within ufology. Walter expresses frustration with how the UFO field often builds "dream worlds on sand" and contributes to the public's ridicule of the topic. He criticizes publications like "UFO Roundup" for spreading unsubstantiated stories, such as a supposed UFO connection to the Concorde crash, and laments the damage this does to the credibility of UFO research.

Mönchengladbach UFO Case

The issue revisits the Mönchengladbach UFO case, which was initially reported as a potential UFO. However, the investigation by MUFON-CES suggested it was a British military helicopter that made an emergency landing due to engine trouble. Walter questions the official explanation, noting the lack of notification to local authorities and the unusual 'blindness' of search and rescue teams. He also disputes the claim that authorities 'fostered the UFO theory,' stating they found it laughable.

UFOs in the Black Forest

Several reports from the Black Forest region in August 2000 are detailed. Initial sightings involved luminous spheres and objects described as 'balls with a ring of light.' These reports led to media attention, including an article in the Schwarzwälder Bote about Marliese Maier's 'close encounter.' The magazine investigates these sightings, with many witnesses eventually identifying the phenomena as misidentifications. For instance, the 'Mönchengladbach UFO' was linked to a Skytracker light effect at a local festival. Other sightings were attributed to aircraft lights, particularly from the Stuttgart airport, with Dennis Kirstein, a UFO researcher, providing explanations based on flight patterns and airport operations. The article emphasizes that many regional sightings are often connected to known phenomena like aircraft, weather balloons, or even large birds.

NASA and Outer-Space UFOs

Jeff Challender, an American UFO researcher, provides a video tape of NASA footage. The magazine argues that these films, often sensationalized by UFO enthusiasts, actually reveal mundane explanations for 'UFOs' seen in space. These include ice crystals around spacecraft, reflections, and exhaust phenomena from thrusters. The article asserts that viewing these complete, unedited recordings can 'heal' people of fantastic UFO notions about space missions.

Rocket Launches and UFO Phenomena

The magazine explores the visual phenomena associated with rocket launches, particularly night launches. It discusses how the exhaust plumes and light effects from rockets like the Minuteman II and Delta II can create unusual shapes and lights in the sky, which are sometimes mistaken for UFOs. The article references images from the NMD test and the 'Petrozavodsk effect,' suggesting these are natural or technological byproducts of rocket propulsion rather than alien craft.

Other Sightings and Analysis

Further reports include a 'boomerang-shaped' object seen over Ludwigshafen, which is analyzed as likely being a flock of birds startled by urban light pollution. Another case involves images of a missile trail from a Peacekeeper rocket, which some interpreted as a UFO. The magazine highlights the diverse reactions from the UFO community, ranging from claims of alien spacecraft to explanations involving conventional aircraft, meteors, or even deliberate fakes. The article stresses the importance of comparing photographic evidence with known phenomena and technical data.

CENAP's Role and Methodology

CENAP positions itself as a critical research organization that aims to clarify UFO phenomena through rigorous investigation and analysis. It collaborates with various national and international institutions and aims to educate the public through media outreach. The magazine encourages readers to report sightings but also emphasizes the need for critical evaluation and the avoidance of unsubstantiated speculation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO reports, the debunking of sensationalist claims, and the emphasis on scientific and rational explanations for aerial phenomena. CENAP's editorial stance is clearly against the uncritical acceptance of UFO theories and advocates for a grounded, evidence-based approach. The magazine consistently points to misidentifications of aircraft, natural events, and technological artifacts as the most common explanations for alleged UFO sightings. There is a strong undercurrent of frustration with the UFO community's tendency towards fantasy and a call for more rigorous, objective research.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, dated 2000, delves into a wide array of topics related to UFOs, space phenomena, and scientific investigations. The magazine presents a critical yet comprehensive look at the UFO phenomenon, exploring eyewitness accounts, scientific theories, and the ongoing debates within the research community.

Articles and Features

Eyewitness Accounts and Explanations

The issue begins by examining public reactions to explanations of UFO sightings, particularly a case involving a bright object with an unusual spectral signature. Some participants in an online discussion expressed skepticism and accused the magazine of 'debunking' and 'disinformation,' while others found the explanations enlightening. The article highlights the diverse interpretations of aerial phenomena, from helicopter searchlights to rockets.

Several eyewitness accounts of unusual aerial events are detailed. Michael Mattern describes a bright, multi-colored condensation trail from a Minuteman intercontinental missile test near Vandenberg, California, noting its slow-moving character and beauty. Ralf Bunge likens a sighting to a comet or mini-comet due to its twin tails. André Knoefel recounts observing a rocket launch from Kapustin Jar in 1985, noting the 'hole' it created in the cloud cover and the subsequent glow.

Recent fireball and meteor activity is also reported. A bright fireball over Colorado on May 27, 2000, was witnessed by hundreds, breaking into three pieces. Another bright daylight fireball was observed over Northern Italy and Southern France on June 18, 2000, characterized by a long, multi-colored tail. The Perseid meteor shower in August 2000 produced several notable fireballs, including one described as blindingly bright by Knut Schaeffner near Hammelbach, Germany.

The Mystery of the Russian Phobos II Probe

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the loss of the Russian Phobos II probe. It addresses ufological speculation about the probe being shot down by UFOs, particularly in light of strange images sent back before its silence. The article dismisses these theories as 'pure nonsense,' attributing the images to natural phenomena and providing a link for further explanation.

UFOs and SETI: A Complex Relationship

The article explores the often-contentious relationship between UFOlogists and SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) researchers. Seth Shostak of the SETI Institute is interviewed, highlighting the common ground of alien contact but the vastly different approaches. SETI scientists work with strict scientific methods and are often critical of the perceived lack of scientific rigor in UFOlogy. Conversely, UFOlogists question why SETI searches the stars when aliens might already be on Earth. The financial aspects are also touched upon, with SETI relying on private funding, similar to some UFO research.

Russian UFO Research

An in-depth look at Russian UFO research is presented, stemming from a joint project by Platov and Sokolov. This project originated from the mass sighting in Petrozavodsk in 1977 and investigated 'paranormal phenomena.' The researchers concluded that many sightings were likely military-technical in nature. The article details the Soviet Union's extensive UFO reporting system, established in 1980, which collected over 3,000 civilian reports. It also touches upon the 'Petrozavodsk-UFO' being identified as a spy satellite launch and the challenges of secrecy surrounding the Plesetsk cosmodrome.

UFOs in the Media and Public Perception

The role of media in shaping public perception of UFOs is discussed. The article notes how films like 'Independence Day' and 'Contact,' along with 'The X-Files,' have fueled public interest. It also critiques how the media can sometimes sensationalize or dismiss UFO reports. The 'Cometa-Report' in France is mentioned as an example of a report by military officials that received mixed reactions from the press and ufological circles.

The State of UFOlogy

The magazine presents a survey of 32 pro-UFOlogists regarding the progress of UFO research. The results indicate a mixed outlook, with only 15% believing in 'great progress,' while 42% saw 'some progress,' and 15% felt there had been 'no progress' or even a 'regression.' The survey also asked about the importance of various related topics, with 'abductions' being rated as highly significant by a majority.

Several prominent UFO researchers offer their perspectives. Jan Aldrich criticizes the media's tendency to sensationalize light phenomena. Gildas Bourdais describes the weak state of UFO research in France. Michael Hesemann criticizes MUFON as an ineffective 'dinosaur' that 'debunks' promising cases. Dr. Eric Davis highlights the work of the National Institute of Discovery Science (NIDS). Dr. David Jacobs notes the fragmented state of the field but remains optimistic due to the insights gained from abduction phenomena. Dr. Bruce Maccabee suggests that while knowledge has increased, the 'final answer' remains elusive, possibly because the evidence points to something already visible but not recognized.

Specific Cases and Organizations

The article touches upon the 'Mars face' and the ongoing search for anomalies on Mars, cautioning against premature speculation. It also discusses the challenges faced by organizations like BUFORA (British UFO Research Association), which has experienced financial difficulties and a decline in reported sightings. The passing of Arnold West, a key figure in BUFORA, is noted.

UFOlogy in Germany and Beyond

The German UFO scene is examined, with a focus on the magazine 'Magazin 2000' and its former editor, Michael Hesemann. The article details Hesemann's departure and the magazine's shift in focus. It also mentions the decline of other esoteric publications and the challenges of maintaining readership.

Raab's work on humanoid reports is discussed, highlighting the difficulty in classifying UFO cases and the ongoing debate about the nature and origin of these phenomena. The article also critiques the tendency of some researchers to focus on speculative theories rather than empirical data.

Upcoming Events

Information is provided about the UFO-Arbeitstagung 2000 (UFO Research Conference 2000) in Cröffelbach, Germany, detailing the program, speakers, and accommodation information.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the persistent mystery of UFOs, the challenges of scientific investigation in this field, and the interplay between public perception, media coverage, and the efforts of researchers. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, encouraging skepticism while acknowledging the possibility of genuine unexplained phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between scientific investigation and speculative theories, and a critique of sensationalism and unverified claims within the UFO community. The magazine aims to provide a platform for diverse viewpoints, including those of eyewitnesses, scientists, and researchers, while maintaining a grounded and analytical approach.

This issue of CENAP REPORT (Nr. 268, 5/2000) focuses on the UFOlogy scene, particularly the MUFON conference held in St. Louis, Missouri, on July 15, 2000. It critically examines the event, the organization's direction, and controversial practices within the field.

MUFON Conference in St. Louis

The report begins by referencing Kenny Young's critique of the St. Louis MUFON conference, which was initially expected to draw 500 attendees but only attracted 350, with 300 ultimately present. Young described the event as 'a dark moment in UFOlogy,' citing a lack of substance and content. Dr. Kelleher from NIDS presented a summary of recent UFO activities, claiming 15-20% of cases involved 'machines,' but failed to disclose his data basis. He also spoke of 'typical equipment malfunctions' and 'games' played by UFOs, suggesting an 'intelligence' behind them. He cited a January 2000 case from Millstadt, Illinois, as a 'Police-UFO-Encounter,' which Young found amusing.

John Schuessler, the new international MUFON Director, announced plans for a 'MUFON-NIDS coalition,' deepening cooperation with NIDS, a move that caused internal friction within MUFON. Gary Hart had previously complained that MUFON prioritized public relations over actual UFO case research, stating that simply collecting newspaper reports and creating colorful statistics was insufficient.

A significant point of unrest arose from the background of John Carpenter, MUFON's Director for Abduction Research. In 1996, due to personal financial problems, Carpenter sold approximately 140 'abductee files' to Bigelow for $100 per file, totaling $14,000. The fate of these files and the cases remained unknown for some time. In 1997, Carpenter released the commercial video cassette "Encounters in Australia," featuring eight abduction interviews that had been privately recorded for research purposes. This commercialization of sensitive material, which identified the abductees to the public, caused distress and anger among those involved.

The 'file-sale' by Carpenter only became known to the UFO community in June 2000, leading to sharp condemnation of his unethical actions. MUFON remained silent, and NIDS distanced itself. Carpenter attempted to downplay the incident, asking for it to be forgotten. This led to speculation about the extent of the 'coalition' between NIDS and MUFON, with fears that Schuessler might 'sell out' to NIDS.

When Carpenter's clients learned of the file sale in August 2000 through internet revelations, they expressed outrage. Carpenter's unethical behavior and MUFON's silence were heavily criticized, although it was acknowledged that the action was 'professional' in a business sense, highlighting the growing commercialization of UFO research.

Colm Kelleher responded on the UFO Updates list on August 9th, defending NIDS's work as focused on 'scientific professionalism' to establish a central point for media and promote the aerial phenomenon as a serious topic, aiming to bridge gaps with scientists and organizations. NIDS aims to bring 'new blood and creative ideas' to UFOlogy.

Abduction Research and Hypnosis

The report criticizes the commercialization of abduction research, particularly through hypnosis regression. It highlights the case of Leah A. Haley, who was recommended to Budd Hopkins by John Carpenter. Haley's case is presented as an example of a failed hypnosis application that led to negative and traumatic experiences being implanted. Carpenter allegedly suggested to Haley that she had been repeatedly abducted by aliens and the US military, creating a classic MILAB case.

Wladislaw Raab of IAN is also mentioned as having complaints, recounting an instance where a UFO 'desperado' persuaded a witness to undergo regression despite her doctor's advice against it. The report suggests that some 'colleagues' prioritize obtaining a simple case history over the witness's health, with some witnesses being hypnotized even if they cannot recall any abduction or UFO sighting.

Ann Druffel's book "How to Defend Yourself Against Alien Abduction" (1998) is mentioned, which was sent to leading US abduction researchers. Druffel's aim was to provide techniques for therapists to help 'traumatized experiencers' exit altered states of consciousness where abduction scenarios occur. Druffel claims her methods are effective in returning individuals to a normal life without trauma.

Critiques of MUFON's Research and Direction

Patrick Huyghe's article "A New Day for UFO Research" on space.com is referenced, discussing the National Institute for Discovery Science (NIDS). The report questions NIDS's effectiveness, noting its founding in 1995 and subsequent silence, despite promises to do better where others failed. NIDS sent out a mass mailing in late 1999, including a brochure and sticker to police stations and radio/TV stations, asking them to report UFO sightings to NIDS's hotline. The brochure suggested that institutions are often approached by UFO observers but lack the personnel to investigate and are generally uninterested. NIDS claimed to receive up to 100 calls per month.

Back at the MUFON symposium, Carpenter and Jeff Sainio presented their 'scientific analyses' on an abduction case. A video was shown of a worker seemingly being 'abducted' by a beam and then reappearing, supposedly explaining 'missing time episodes.' However, Kenny Young and others dismissed this as a simple camera malfunction, noting a brief 'flash of light' that Sainio attributed to something other than a 'conventional source.' Young became angry at Sainio's fixation on the phrase 'abduction light,' feeling the presentation was a joke. Young, who had previously supported Ed Walters' case, began to have serious doubts about the objectivity and ideology behind such presentations.

Other presentations also drew criticism. Videos were shown of 'rods,' identified as insects flying close to the camera. A MUFON State Director from Louisiana presented a video of a 'fast-moving UFO,' which Young interpreted as a bird diving for an insect. Another video purportedly showing 'light spheres' emerging from clouds and performing intelligent maneuvers failed to impress the audience, with the presenter blaming the video projector's low resolution.

Dr. Robert Wood presented on the 'Majestic Twelve' documents, arguing for their authenticity based on Timothy S. Cooper's confirmation through 'Remote Viewing.' Kevin Randle also caused a stir by accusing MUFON of 'censorship,' stating he was twice told not to present his critical views on abductions. Randle's presentation led to half the audience leaving when he accused the group of having an 'ideological and unscientific agenda.' Young thanked Randle for his 'brave words.'

George A. Filer, MUFON Director for the Eastern States, viewed MUFON positively under Schuessler, who he believed brought 'new and exciting ideas.' Filer highlighted Dr. Roger Leir's presentation on 'alien implants' with antennas, which Leir claimed were significant discoveries.

MUFON's New Marketing Strategy

John Schuessler, the new international MUFON Chief, has ambitious plans, including relocating MUFON headquarters and its archives from Seguin, Texas, to Denver, Colorado. The collection, assembled by the 79-year-old MUFON founder Walt Andrus, includes newspaper clippings, magazines, books, UFO photos, artwork, alien dolls, and artifacts from early American space programs. Andrus had already created a small exhibition at his home, but Seguin was considered too remote. Schuessler aims to establish a larger exhibition in Denver by September.

Mike Curta, MUFON State Director for Colorado, claims MUFON receives between 50,000 and 80,000 reports of UFOs from public sources annually, a figure the report suggests may be inflated. Colorado reportedly has about one UFO case per week, many from the San Luis Valley. Schuessler and Curta are reportedly searching for a suitable location for the planned museum.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue is highly critical of the current state of UFOlogy, particularly within organizations like MUFON. Key themes include the commercialization of UFO research, the questionable methodologies employed (especially concerning hypnosis regression), the lack of transparency and scientific rigor, and internal conflicts within organizations. The editorial stance is one of skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims and a call for greater professionalism and ethical conduct. The report highlights a divide between those who prioritize research and those who focus on public relations or commercial gain. The cartoon at the end satirizes the diverse and sometimes contradictory approaches within UFO research groups, including a jab at CENAP itself.