CENAP Report - No 225

Magazine Overview

This issue of CENAP-REPORT, number 225, dated 6/95, is a German-language UFO magazine published by CENAP. It presents itself as 'the inconvenient - other UFO magazine' and focuses on critical investigation of UFO phenomena.

Cover Story

The cover features the title "CENAP-REPORT" prominently, with a subtitle "Das unbequeme - andere UFO - Magazin." The main visual is a photograph of a bright, glowing object in the sky. The cover headlines highlight key articles: "UFO-Seminar im CR," "Zurück nach Roswell," and "Das Geheimnis: Der Reflektor."

Editorial Content

Impressum and Introduction

The "Impressum" section identifies Werner Walter as the publisher and editor-in-chief, and Hansjürgen Köhler as responsible for subscriptions. CENAP is described as a private, non-commercial organization founded in 1976, dedicated to the analysis of UFO reports. It is integrated with the GWUP (Society for the Scientific Investigation of the Paranormal) and has served as a consultant for the German Aerospace Agency (DARA). CENAP aims to educate the public through media and scientific institutions.

The editorial "Zu diesem CR, hallo Zielgruppe..." by W. Walter critiques the RTL television magazine "Extra" for its sensationalist and uncritical reporting on alleged alien landings, particularly its handling of the 'Roswell Alien Film' and the lack of journalistic rigor. Walter dismisses the supposed 'Roswell Alien Film' as a disservice to UFOlogy, stating that the expected world sensation did not materialize and the UFO community must now deal with the confusion it created.

Article: Para-Plusch und der CR-Computer

This section addresses a technical issue where a manuscript page was lost from the computer. It then delves into a critique of pseudoscientific claims, particularly those related to psychic abilities. The author, Axel Becker, criticizes a book by Meckelburg for presenting debunked tricksters as genuine psychics. He highlights the skepticism of James Randi, who offers a substantial reward for anyone who can demonstrate psychic abilities under controlled conditions, a challenge no one has met. The article details experiments involving psychokinesis, such as metal bending by children, and points out methodological flaws and potential deception, citing examples from John Taylor's research and the work of Targ and Puthoff concerning Uri Geller. The author emphasizes that many supposed psychic phenomena can be explained by trickery or flawed experimental design.

UFO-Forschung: Ein kleines Problem noch...

This article discusses a UFO wave in Vista, California, in October 1994, involving reports of green fireballs and skyquakes. It highlights a case where MUFON investigator Laura Miller witnessed a yellow-round object. Despite analysis by MUFON researchers, the object remained unidentified. However, a group of young people claimed to have launched homemade hot air balloons, and a comparison of Davidson's video of a balloon launch with Miller's video showed a surprising similarity. Despite this, some UFO researchers remained unconvinced, suggesting they were still open to 'more real' UFOs.

The article then presents several cases from the CENAP archive:

• Gabriele John (Nettetal-Lobberich): In June or July 1983, she observed a bright object that hovered and then ascended rapidly. Her description included a dome-like shape and a bright light, with a faint humming sound.
• Gerd Schmidt (Dresden): In January 1991, reports of luminous spheres were investigated. These objects were described as yellowish-red, silent, and visible for up to 15 minutes. The head of the observatory noted the credibility of the observers but lacked a definitive explanation.
• Anni Honefeld (Emden): In September/October 1992, she saw a large, round, sun-like object moving silently at low altitude. She described it as resembling a bright red balloon but rejected this comparison due to its self-luminescence.
• Angela O. (Wardenburg): In August 1992, she heard an unusual noise and saw a luminous, orange-red sphere hovering. The noise persisted even after the object disappeared.
• Sven Harnack (Bad Freienwalde): In August 1993, he reported seeing a bright object that changed colors and had 'portholes,' which he filmed but did not capture clearly. He described it as elliptical and pulsating.

The article concludes that many of these sightings can be attributed to misidentified phenomena, particularly hot air balloons, and criticizes the lack of rigor in some UFO research.

Heißluftballon (Hot Air Balloon)

This section provides instructions on how to construct and launch a simple hot air balloon, emphasizing that it should only be used in calm weather and at a safe distance from flammable materials. It serves as a practical demonstration of a common misidentification for UFOs.

Article: Es war der Jupiter (It was Jupiter)

This article, referencing the Freiberger Anzeiger, presents an astronomical explanation for the 'Lichtenberg UFO' sighting by Christine Preißler. Klaus Rümmler, a retired math, physics, and astronomy teacher, identified the object as the planet Jupiter. He calculated that Jupiter was in the described direction at the time of the sighting and that atmospheric conditions and light refraction could have made it appear unusual. Rümmler's explanation aligns with CENAP's general approach of seeking conventional explanations for UFO reports. The article also touches upon the psychological aspects of eyewitness testimony, noting that observers can misinterpret phenomena and that their memories can be influenced by preconceptions and external information, such as media portrayals of UFOs.

Article: Different Interests Between UFO Witnesses and UFO Researchers

This piece explores the inherent conflict between UFO witnesses, who often seek confirmation of an extraordinary event, and UFO researchers, who aim for objective analysis and often find mundane explanations. The author, W. Walter, discusses how witnesses can be disappointed or even angered when their sightings are identified as common phenomena. He emphasizes that while the feelings of witnesses are valid, the pursuit of truth requires objective investigation. The article highlights the unreliability of eyewitness memory, particularly regarding colors, speeds, and details, and the tendency for the brain to fill in gaps or alter perceptions to fit existing mental models or external influences (like media depictions of UFOs).

Case Studies and Analysis

The magazine presents several case studies, often concluding with mundane explanations:

• Christine Preißler (Lichtenberg): Initially reported a mysterious, silent, luminous object. Later, astronomer Klaus Rümmler identified it as the planet Jupiter, explaining the unusual appearance due to atmospheric conditions and light refraction. Despite this, Preißler continued to receive numerous reports from others who claimed to have seen similar phenomena, suggesting a persistent belief in the extraordinary.
• Simone A. (Lößnitz): Reported a 'box-shaped' object with changing colors. The analysis suggests this was likely the planet Venus, based on its position and appearance, and that the 'object' was magnified and distorted through video manipulation.

The article also touches upon the challenges of distinguishing between genuine UFO sightings and misidentifications, the influence of media on public perception, and the psychological factors that contribute to the UFO phenomenon. It criticizes some UFO researchers for not adequately considering mundane explanations and for being too quick to accept extraordinary claims.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

CENAP-REPORT consistently adopts a skeptical yet investigative stance towards UFO phenomena. A recurring theme is the identification of common objects and atmospheric conditions (such as hot air balloons, aircraft lights, and planets like Jupiter and Venus) as misidentified 'UFOs.' The magazine emphasizes the importance of rigorous scientific methodology, critical analysis of eyewitness testimony, and the psychological factors that influence perception and memory. While acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena, the editorial stance leans heavily towards debunking sensationalist claims and promoting rational explanations. The magazine appears to be critical of what it perceives as unscientific or overly credulous approaches within the broader UFO community, advocating for a more grounded and evidence-based approach to the subject.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, Nr. 225, dated August/September 1995, focuses on UFO phenomena, presenting a critical and analytical perspective. The magazine title is 'CENAP REPORT,' and it is published in German.

Key Articles and Content

The Jupiter as a UFO in Zigzag Flight

The issue begins with an analysis of a UFO sighting reported by Melanie S. from Ladenburg, Germany, on May 28, 1995. Initially, she described an object rotating on its axis, changing direction and altitude in a zigzag flight, appearing disc-shaped or like Saturn. The author, after personal observation, identified the object as the planet Jupiter, accompanied by the star Antares. The witness's family, particularly her mother, reacted with excitement and hysteria, which the author attributes to emotional enthusiasm rather than a genuine UFO experience. The article highlights the discrepancy between subjective witness descriptions and objective reality, emphasizing the role of emotional components in UFO reports.

Levelland Sightings and USAF Investigations

The report details the Levelland, Texas, UFO sightings from November 2, 1957. Multiple witnesses reported a white-yellowish, torpedo-shaped object that caused car engines to stall and headlights to fail. The USAF's Project Blue Book investigated the case, attributing it to a 'weather phenomenon of electrical nature, known as ball lightning or St. Elmo's fire.' The article criticizes the investigation for not interviewing all witnesses and for allegedly misrepresenting the weather conditions. It also touches upon the USAF's internal reaction to public criticism, leading to an order for a review of their UFO operations and the development of a standard UFO research code.

Henkes Debunkerecke: The Reality of Cover-up and Disinformation

This section, written by 'Henke,' critically examines the claims of UFO cover-ups by governments and secret services. The author argues that ufologists themselves are often the source of disinformation and cover-ups, withholding information from skeptics and critics. He criticizes researchers like Johannes Fiebag and Michael Hesemann for not sharing their data and for selectively presenting information. The article suggests that the fear of being ridiculed or losing credibility might drive ufologists to present fantastical claims, especially in their publications, while being more cautious in public appearances.

UFOs: Some Lessons for Research

This section discusses the challenges in UFO research, emphasizing the need for a scientific approach. It highlights the ambiguity of the term 'UFO' (Unidentified Flying Object) and criticizes the tendency of some ufologists to project alien spaceship narratives onto unconfirmed sightings. The article also touches upon the psychological aspects of UFO belief and the difficulty in distinguishing between genuine sightings and misinterpretations or hoaxes. It mentions the Condon Report and its conclusion that UFO research was not scientifically justified.

International Sightings and Media Coverage

The issue includes reports on UFO sightings in other countries. An article titled 'Argentinian Pilot: "I saw a UFO!"' describes an incident on August 3, 1995, where pilot Jorge Polanco reported a luminous object preventing his aircraft from landing in San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina. The object was described as the size of an aircraft and emitted light. Another brief report mentions a mysterious light seen over Bennstedt, Germany, with speculation ranging from a UFO to an aircraft's lights.

Swiss Air Force UFO Dossier

A report from Switzerland reveals that the Swiss Air Force maintained a secret UFO dossier containing observations from 1971 to 1988. While initially denied, the existence of a two-centimeter-thick file was confirmed. The dossier primarily contains reports from private individuals, with a few from military pilots. The article notes that no specific agency is currently responsible for UFOs at the federal level in Switzerland, and civilian air traffic control has not detected any UFOs on radar.

UFO Expert Round Table on SAT1

The magazine discusses a TV program on SAT1 featuring a debate on UFOs. The report highlights the participation of Werner L. Forster, editor of 'UFO-Nachrichten,' who claims to believe in UFOs due to 'compelling evidence' and the testimony of military and scientific experts. The article contrasts Forster's claims with the more skeptical stance of the program's moderator and other participants, who emphasize the need for a clear definition of 'UFO' as an unidentified object rather than assuming alien visitation. The discussion also touches upon the suppression of UFO research and the tendency to dismiss sightings as balloons or weather phenomena.

Cover-up and Disinformation by Ufologists

This section reiterates the criticism that ufologists, rather than governments or secret services, are the primary sources of cover-ups and disinformation. The author cites examples of ufologists selectively presenting information, distorting facts, and exaggerating claims. The article suggests that the desire for ideological or commercial gain motivates this behavior. It also touches upon the 'sect-like' behavior of some UFO groups that isolate themselves and refuse to cooperate with critical organizations.

The Monster of Loch Ness

Briefly mentioned is a TV program on HR3 about the Loch Ness Monster, suggesting that the legend of the monster is deeply rooted in speculation due to the lake's dark and mysterious nature.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of CENAP REPORT include the critical examination of UFO sightings, the analysis of witness testimony, the debunking of alleged UFO phenomena, and the critique of misinformation within the UFO community. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards sensational claims and a strong emphasis on scientific investigation and rational explanation. The magazine advocates for a clear, scientific definition of UFOs and questions the credibility of many ufologists, accusing them of promoting unsubstantiated theories and engaging in disinformation.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, dated August/September 1995, focuses heavily on debunking popular UFO narratives, particularly the Roswell incident, and also touches upon the Loch Ness Monster. The magazine adopts a skeptical and analytical stance, scrutinizing eyewitness accounts, media portrayals, and official statements.

The Truth About The UFO Crash At Roswell

The lead article, "The Truth About The UFO Crash At Roswell," by Kevin D. Randle & Donald R. Schmitt, is critically examined. The report argues that much of the "alien spaceship" narrative surrounding Roswell is a fabrication that emerged much later, particularly after the 1950s and intensified in the late 1970s. The magazine emphasizes that the initial reports and evidence point towards a more mundane explanation.

The Radar Reflector Theory

A significant portion of the article is dedicated to the "radar reflector" theory, suggesting that the debris found was part of a high-altitude spy balloon, likely from Project MOGUL, which crashed near Roswell. This project was highly classified, and its true nature was concealed, leading to the UFO speculation. The report details how the US Navy admitted to using SKYHOOK balloons, which were similar, for various purposes.

Eyewitness Accounts and Media Analysis

The magazine dissects various eyewitness accounts, including those of Jesse Marcel and Mac Brazel. It questions the reliability of these accounts, suggesting they may have been influenced by later media reports and the growing UFO craze. The report criticizes the way media outlets, including television shows and newspapers, have sensationalized the Roswell incident, often prioritizing sensationalism over factual accuracy. The role of journalists like Jason Kellahin and R.A.Adair, who reported on the incident at the time, is contrasted with later 'witnesses' whose accounts are deemed less credible.

Official Investigations and Cover-up Claims

The article discusses official investigations, such as those by the GAO and USAF, which concluded that there was no evidence of an alien crash or cover-up of extraterrestrial material. It highlights the findings of Bruce Ashcroft, a historian who found no evidence of UFO-related cover-ups in official archives. The report acknowledges that there might have been a cover-up, but suggests it was related to the classified nature of Project MOGUL, not aliens.

Alien Autopsies and Physical Descriptions

The issue addresses the persistent rumors of alien autopsies related to Roswell. It dismisses claims of alien bodies being autopsied, citing the lack of credible evidence and the fact that key figures involved in such claims, like Dr. Jesse B. Johnson Jr., had already passed away. Descriptions of alleged aliens are presented as speculative and not supported by verifiable facts.

The Loch Ness Monster Connection

In a parallel discussion, the magazine examines the Loch Ness Monster phenomenon. It points out that the famous 1934 photograph of Nessie was later revealed to be a hoax. The article suggests that the public's fascination with Nessie, much like with UFOs, is fueled by a desire for the extraordinary and a willingness to believe sensational stories, even in the absence of concrete proof.

Media Appearances and UFOlogy

The report critiques media appearances by UFO proponents, such as Erich von Däniken and others, on talk shows. It highlights how these discussions often devolve into speculation and sensationalism, with little grounding in scientific evidence. The magazine expresses concern about the media's role in perpetuating UFO myths and the lack of critical analysis in many public discussions.

Specific Incidents and Reports

Several other UFO-related events and reports are mentioned, including the Randlesham Forest incident and a TV show featuring an 'alien abduction' film. The magazine also discusses the participation of UFO academics and researchers in media discussions, often pointing out their lack of concrete evidence or their reliance on anecdotal information.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards sensational UFO claims, the critical analysis of media coverage, and the importance of factual evidence over speculation. The editorial stance is clearly that of debunking popular myths and presenting a more grounded, rational perspective on unexplained phenomena. The magazine emphasizes the need for rigorous investigation and warns against the uncritical acceptance of anecdotal evidence, particularly when it aligns with pre-existing beliefs or desires for extraordinary explanations. The parallels drawn between the Nessie phenomenon and UFOlogy underscore a view that public fascination with the unknown can often lead to the creation of myths and hoaxes.

This issue of CENAP REPORT, dated August/September 1995, delves into various UFO-related topics, with a significant focus on the Roswell incident and its ongoing investigation. The magazine presents findings from a GAO report, discusses controversial UFO films, and highlights recent sightings and incidents from around the world.

Roswell Incident and GAO Report

The lead article discusses the Roswell affair's presence on the internet and the findings of a report by the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO), which was requested by Steven H. Schiff. The GAO report indicated that some government records concerning RAAF (Royal Australian Air Force) activities from March 1945 to December 1949, and RAAF outgoing messages from October 1946 to December 1949, were destroyed. However, the article argues that this destruction was likely due to administrative restructuring, as the RAAF was integrated into the newly formed USAF in September 1947. The report also noted that the Air Force Safety Agency recorded four aircraft accidents in New Mexico in July 1947, which could be misremembered as crash incidents.

The GAO's investigation extended to the Air Materiel Command at Wright Field, examining records from 1947 to 1950. They found no mention of a Roswell crash or any related investigations. Furthermore, the GAO found no records pertaining to the alleged Roswell crash within the National Security Council, the White House, or the Energy Ministry. The article emphasizes that the RAAF was under strict control and external supervision, making it unlikely that they would have handled such a significant event without informing higher command.

MJ-12 Papers and Forgery Claims

The issue also addresses the controversial MJ-12 papers. The GAO found no proof that the MJ-12 material contained authentic executive documents. It was suggested that 'MJ Twelve' first appeared in a message from the Operations Division of the Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) in Albuquerque in November 1980. The AFOSI commander reportedly found no official record of this paper, and AFOSI declared it a 'forgery.' The article attributes the material to Richard Doty, described as a suspicious figure who has influenced modern UFOlogy.

UFO Film and Eyewitness Accounts

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the controversial 1947 UFO film, which purportedly shows the autopsy of an alien. UFO experts Erich von Däniken and Michael Hesemann are quoted, with Hesemann stating that Kodak laboratory specialists confirmed the film's authenticity and its origin from 1947. Von Däniken suggests that if the film is genuine, it would be a greater scandal than Watergate.

International UFO Sightings and Incidents

The magazine reports on several international UFO incidents:

• Argentina: Oscar Zavaleta, a 65-year-old farmer, claims he was abducted by aliens with long, copper-colored hair, taken aboard a UFO, and subjected to a medical examination. He was later found 2000 kilometers from his home.
• Scotland: Bonnybridge is highlighted as the 'UFO Capital of Europe,' with approximately eighty mysterious incidents reported since 1992. Eyewitnesses Elizabeth and Stuart Small described seeing a large, egg-shaped object with white lights hovering above their car.
• Germany: A student named Daniel Winter filmed an elliptical, bright object with white lights and a red light underneath in Quedlinburg, which he believes to be a UFO. His mother, Karin Winter, was initially skeptical but became unsure after seeing the footage.
• Canada: A meteorite, described as an orange fireball the size of a grapefruit, crashed into an empty motorhome in Windsor, Ontario. Witnesses reported seeing a fireball and hearing numerous calls about a possible plane crash.
• Brazil: The city of Barra do Garças is reportedly preparing a five-hectare site for the landing of extraterrestrial visitors, following a decision by the city council.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the persistent mystery of the Roswell incident, the potential for government cover-ups, and the ongoing debate about the authenticity of UFO evidence, such as the 1947 film. The magazine appears to present information from various sources, including official reports (like the GAO) and eyewitness accounts, while also critically examining claims and potential hoaxes (like the MJ-12 papers). The editorial stance seems to be one of cautious investigation, acknowledging the public's fascination with UFOs while seeking factual evidence and debunking misinformation.