CENAP REPORT

Magazine Overview

This issue of CENAP REPORT, number 155, dated 1.89 (likely January 1989), is published by CENAP (Centrales Erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher Himmelsphänomene) in Germany. The cover prominently features the headline 'REAGAN'S UFO' alongside other article titles such as 'UFO'S und SOZIOLOGIE', 'UFOLOGIE EUROPA'S: 1989', and 'UFO über ADELAIDE(AUS)?'. The cover also includes an illustration of a Cessna 140 Citation jet and a map of Australia. The price is listed as DM 3,90.

CENAP: The Organization

The magazine provides information about CENAP, describing it as a private, independent institution dedicated to investigating UFO phenomena since 1976. CENAP aims to provide scientific explanations for reported sightings, labeling natural phenomena that mimic UFOs as 'UFO stimuli'. The organization emphasizes its rigorous, scientific approach and mentions collaborations with various governmental bodies, including the Ministry of Defense and the Federal Aviation Office. CENAP also maintains a large archive of UFO-related materials, including a significant European UFO video archive.

UFOLOGIE EUROPA'S: 1989

This section, authored by Werner Waltar, discusses the evolving landscape of ufology in Europe, particularly in anticipation of the European single market in 1992. It highlights the growing divergence between European and American ufological approaches. The article notes that while American ufology has historically been a driving force, European ufology is developing its own distinct identity, increasingly incorporating sociological and humanistic perspectives. The authors, Eduardo Russo and Glen P. Grassino, contribute a piece titled 'TOWARDS A EUROPEAN UFOLOGY - WHERE IS AMERICA GOING TO?', which explores whether a truly European ufology exists and its potential future.

They argue that while ufology originated in the US in the late 1940s, European ufology has taken a different path. Unlike the American tendency towards scientific investigation and themes like contactees and cover-ups, European ufologists are more focused on a revisionist approach and the integration of human sciences. Cultural and historical factors are cited as reasons for this divergence. The authors suggest that despite national differences and language barriers, a European framework for ufology is emerging. They emphasize the need for exchange and methodological standards to foster a common basis.

National Differences in Ufology

The article 'NATIONALI UNTINENTE DE' (likely referring to national differences across continents) delves deeper into the distinctions between European and American ufology. It points out that language barriers (14 languages spoken in Western Europe) and historical differences contribute to the fragmentation of national ufological communities. Some national ufologies have gained prominence due to the global reach of their languages (e.g., French and English), facilitating international exchange. Others remain isolated due to a lack of 'input and output'.

Specific examples of national interests are given, such as 'SKY-Watching' in England in the 60s, the 'UMMO-story' originating in Spain, and the 'Earthlight' discussion that struggled to cross borders. The article also notes variations in specific UFO/IFO types, like 'PARTY GAG BALLOONS' accounting for a significant percentage of German sightings, and 'LASER BEAMS' in Italy.

The authors contrast the American tendency to be 'naïve' and 'over-sensitive' with a perceived European tendency to be 'too complicated' and 'abstract'. They acknowledge that these are stereotypes but suggest they contain a kernel of truth. The article posits that the American UFOlogy model, like the American cultural model, may be in crisis, with Europe forging its own path.

The Historical Role of American Ufology

This section traces the origins of the UFO phenomenon in America around 1947 and its subsequent 'importation' to Europe in 1950. It lists key figures and projects in early American ufology, such as Arnold, Mantell, Keyhoe, Lorenzen, Ruppelt, APRO, NICAP, Project Bluebook, UFO-CAT, and MUFON. The development of terminology and classification systems by Jacques Vallee and J. Allen Hynek, as well as the influence of John Keel, are highlighted. The article notes that the US took the lead in various UFO-related developments, from daylight discs in 1947 to contactees in the 50s and abduction phenomena in the 70s.

What About Europe?

The article suggests that European ufology began to change around 1977 with the initiation of civilian scientific studies into UFOs in France. It posits that a 'rethinking' effect, moving away from 'paraphysical' ufology, has led to greater acceptance of figures like John Keel and Jacques Vallee in Europe, particularly among intellectuals. The 'humanistic turn' advocated by groups like MUFOB (later Magonia) called for a 'new ufology'. This shift has led to a situation where 'true believers' in alien spaceships are harder to find among British ufologists.

The Current American Ufological Model

The article critiques contemporary American ufology, citing examples like Whitley Strieber's 'COMMUNION', Hopkins' 'alien abductors', Gery Kinder's book on Eduard Meier, the MJ-12 'cosmic cover-up', and the Gulf Breeze photos. It suggests that American ufology appears to be regressing to the themes of the 1950s, with a resurgence of contactees and 'alien kidnappings'. The authors express surprise at the focus on these topics, noting that many European cases lack parallels, such as saucer crashes or widespread abductions.

They observe that while Americans have the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) for cover-up investigations, the focus has shifted from the Air Force to presidential involvement and the Majestic-12 group. Computer analysis is now used for photo verification, and 'alien kidnappings' are presented as evidence, replacing older forms of proof. The article suggests that the US is now in a phase of 'catching up' with themes that emerged in Europe earlier.

The Difference in Approach

The authors highlight a key difference: European ufologists no longer dismiss IFOs (Identified Flying Objects) as 'false UFOs' but consider them a conceptual reality. They point out the statistical significance of IFOs (9:1 ratio) which they believe is overlooked by their American counterparts. The article suggests that this difference stems from the sociological and psychological dimensions that European ufology embraces, while American ufology tends to identify and eliminate IFOs.

Why the Divergence?

The article attributes the divergence to two distinct ufological models. The American model is characterized by its focus on abduction reports, UFO crashes, and government cover-ups. The European model, conversely, integrates IFOs and human sciences. The authors express concern that this divergence could lead to separate, potentially opposing, ufological movements.

The Social Function of CE III Reports

This section, by Ulrich Magin, explores the sociological function of 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' (CE III) reports. It suggests that these reports, despite cultural variations, represent archetypes of the collective unconscious. Drawing on the work of researchers like Jacques Vallee, John Keel, and Leander Petzoldt, the article posits that CE III reports often reflect existing cultural legends and myths, such as those of elves, goblins, or the 'Wild Hunt'.

Magin argues that while historical phenomena like poltergeists and apparitions had negative connotations, CE III reports, particularly contactee cases, are often positive, portraying 'superior star brothers' offering help. However, pure CE III sightings, which are more widespread, serve a broader social function, akin to medieval beliefs in goblins, as a universal explanatory framework. The article notes that while the UFO belief is not as universally accepted as the goblin belief once was, it still provides a framework for understanding the unknown.

Commentary on Ufology and Sociology

Alexander Keul provides commentary on Ulrich Magin's series, offering corrections and clarifications. He disputes the notion that Austrian cases were included in the 'German' reports, finding it politically insensitive. Keul also clarifies his own research on UFO witnesses, stating that his 1980 study did not conclude that witnesses were psychopathologically impaired but rather that no 'normal' witnesses remained after analysis. He also corrects Magin's interpretation of his work on British ufology, stating he does not identify as a 'Jungian' but uses Jung's theories as a tool, similar to how he uses Freud's.

Astrowarning

Two 'Astrowarning' sections, one for January 1989 and another for February 1989, by Roland Horn, provide astronomical information relevant to potential UFO sightings. These sections detail planetary movements, meteor showers (Quadrantids, Alpha-Aurigids, Delta-Leonids), and the visibility of stars like Jupiter, Mars, Venus, Saturn, Sirius, and Orion. The author suggests that most astronomical phenomena are unlikely to be mistaken for UFOs.

UFO Over Adelaide?

This article by A.T. Brunt addresses a claim made in a PEOPLE magazine article that an unusual light seen over Adelaide on November 22, 1985, was an 'alien spacecraft'. Brunt disputes this claim, stating that the assertion was made without considering all the facts. He mentions having analyzed a video recording of the event and determined the light's position relative to local landmarks, suggesting it was not an alien object.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes a scientific and critical approach to UFO phenomena, distinguishing itself from what it perceives as more sensationalist or less rigorous ufology, particularly in the United States. There is a strong emphasis on sociological and psychological factors influencing UFO reports, and a clear effort to differentiate European ufology from its American counterpart. The editorial stance appears to favor a rational, evidence-based investigation, while acknowledging the cultural and folkloric dimensions of the UFO phenomenon. The publication also aims to debunk hoaxes and misinterpretations, as seen in the article questioning the Adelaide light sighting.

This issue of the National Enquirer, dated October 11, 1988, features a sensational cover story about former US President Ronald Reagan's alleged UFO encounter. The magazine also delves into other UFO-related topics, including a debunked sighting in Australia, the activities of UFO research organizations, and the development of advanced military aircraft.

Reagan's UFO Encounter

The lead article details a purported UFO sighting by Ronald Reagan in 1974 when he was Governor of California. Pilot Bill Paynter recounts how Reagan ordered him to follow a mysterious white light that appeared to be a UFO. Paynter describes the object as moving at incredible speed and performing a sharp 45-degree turn before ascending rapidly into the sky. Reagan himself reportedly described the event to Norman C. Miller, a journalist for the Wall Street Journal, expressing his shock and later researching UFO history. The article suggests that Reagan's interest in UFOs was piqued by this encounter, leading him to explore historical sightings. The National Enquirer claims to have uncovered this story through interviews with Paynter and others close to the event, and it is also mentioned in the book "Landslide: The Unmaking of the President."

Adelaide UFO Sighting Debunked

Another section addresses a UFO sighting over Adelaide, Australia, which was initially reported by John Pinkney. The article presents evidence suggesting the light was actually a Qantas flight (QF6) from Singapore to Melbourne. Aviation records confirm the flight's position and trajectory, which closely matched the reported UFO's path. The phenomenon is explained as a sun reflection off the underside of the aircraft, a common occurrence when the sun is at a specific angle relative to the aircraft and observer, especially during twilight hours. The article emphasizes that such reflections can be seen from considerable distances and that the 'tail' observed was likely a condensation trail.

UFO Research and Media Coverage

The magazine highlights the work of CENAP (Central Research Network for Extraordinary Sky Phenomena), a German UFO research organization. It details CENAP's involvement in various media appearances, including television programs and radio interviews, throughout 1988. The article notes CENAP's efforts to counter what they perceive as one-sided or sensationalized reporting on UFOs by German media outlets like ZDF, SAT1, and RTLplus. It also mentions a specific incident where CENAP spokesperson Werner Walter was interviewed for a Südwestfunk Baden-Baden news report about a UFO photo exhibition.

Controversial UFO Claims

The issue touches upon a controversial claim by UFO researcher Len Stringfield regarding an extraterrestrial being allegedly shot and killed by US Air Force personnel on January 18, 1978, at McGuire Air Force Base. The article notes that this story had previously circulated in UFO literature since 1980 and criticizes the German magazine BILD for presenting it as new information.

Stealth Bomber and Military Technology

The magazine also features information on the Northrop B-2 Spirit stealth bomber, presenting it as a new secret weapon. It describes the aircraft's design and its intended role in penetrating enemy airspace undetected. The article links the B-2's development to earlier flying wing technology from World War II.

Other UFO-Related Content

Further sections include a report on a police pursuit of a suspected ultralight aircraft in Munich, which was initially mistaken for a UFO. There's also a mention of a survey on ball lightning conducted by Dr. Alexander Keul and a discussion about the modern myth of UFOs and extraterrestrials, with Werner Walter presenting a skeptical viewpoint.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around UFO sightings, the debunking of alleged phenomena, the role of media in UFO reporting, and the skepticism of researchers like Werner Walter and CENAP. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, aiming to provide rational explanations for reported sightings while also acknowledging the public's fascination with the unexplained. There's a clear effort to distinguish between genuine phenomena and sensationalism or misinterpretation, particularly in the context of media coverage and the public's susceptibility to belief in the extraordinary.