CENAP Report - No 136

Magazine Overview

Title: NIGHT LIGHTS
Issue: Nr. 136
Volume: 6/1987
Date: June 1987
Publisher: CENAP (Centrale Erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher Himmelsphänomene)
Country: Germany
Language: German
Price: DM 3,90

This issue of "NIGHT LIGHTS" is a German-language magazine dedicated to the investigation of unusual aerial phenomena, published by CENAP. The cover prominently features the title "NIGHT LIGHTS" and a photograph from a television studio, hinting at media involvement. The main cover headlines announce articles related to CENAP's media appearances, the identification of the 'Landespur' from Delphos, and an analysis of V. Buttlar's work.

CENAP - Aufgaben und Ziele (Tasks and Goals)

Page 2 details CENAP's mission as a scientific society founded in 1976 to record, analyze, and evaluate unusual aerial observations. It emphasizes a scientific, non-commercial, and ideologically independent approach. CENAP aims to identify reported phenomena, with a high success rate in explaining them. Beyond identification, it focuses on 'psychohygiene,' which includes proactive education and debunking of unserious reporting, particularly critiquing the influence of mass media on public opinion. CENAP also critically examines the symptoms, genesis, and psychosocial causes of 'UFO cults.' In 1986, CENAP was recommended by the German Ministry of the Interior as a point of contact for sighting reports.

NIGHT LIGHTS – Das CENAP-Fachjournal (The CENAP Professional Journal)

This section describes "NIGHT LIGHTS" as CENAP's new report that factually and critically documents, analyzes, and comments on current and historical sighting reports, with special attention to media coverage. It also serves as an organ for 'psychohygiene,' educating readers about unserious reporting and the aims of pseudoreligious and occult groups. The journal aims to fulfill an important, otherwise neglected, public function.

Impressum (Imprint)

The imprint states that the publisher is CENAP Mannheim/Heidelberg, with monthly publication around the middle of the month. The issue contains approximately 40 pages. The price for a single issue is DM 3.90, and an annual subscription (12 issues) costs DM 40. Reprints of articles, even excerpts, require written permission from the authors. The magazine assumes no liability for unsolicited manuscripts or documents, and author honoraria cannot be paid. The editorial staff reserves the right to shorten letters to the editor. No guarantee is given for the completeness and accuracy of translations. Orders for "NIGHT LIGHTS" should be sent to CENAP Mannheim 9.

CENAP-Institute

Contact information is provided for CENAP institutes in Mannheim, Heilbronn, and Heidelberg, along with their respective representatives (Werner Walter, Hansjürgen Köhler, Jochen Ickinger, Rudolf Henke). Additionally, the 'Meldestelle der GEP' (Reporting Office of the GEP - Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänomens) in Lüdenscheid is listed.

Inhalt (Table of Contents)

Page 3 presents the table of contents:

• Historie (History): "Vor 40 Jahren: Erste 'Untertassen'-Sichtung" (40 Years Ago: First 'Saucer' Sighting) - page 6
• In eigener Sache (In Our Own Interest): "CENAP im Fernsehen: So ein Zoff..." (CENAP on Television: What a Fuss...) - page 10
• Bücher (Books): "V. Buttlar - ein Plagiator?" (V. Buttlar - a Plagiarist?) by W. Hain, R. Henke - page 17
• Fotos (Photos): "Berühmtes Foto enträtselt" (Famous Photo Deciphered) - page 34
• Rückschau (Retrospective): "'Landespur' von Delphos identifiziert" ('Land Trace' from Delphos Identified) by R. Henke - page 38
• Medien (Media): "UFO-Spektakel im Denver-Clan" (UFO Spectacle in the Denver Clan) - page 40
• Kurzmeldungen (Short News): page 43
• Impressum (Imprint): page 2
• Briefe (Letters): page 4
• Astrowarnung (Astro Warning): (15.6.-30.7.87) - page 42
• Veranstaltungen (Events): "Para Tage in Mannheim" - pages 43, 48

Editorial

The editorial reflects on the 40th anniversary of the first 'flying saucer' sightings, noting that they were not necessarily what they seemed. It highlights CENAP's recent appearances on two German television shows (ARD and ZDF), which, despite limited immediate reaction, increased their public profile. The editorial mentions that the journal's focus this issue is heavily on media, with three articles related to television and one to books. It notes the difficulty in getting author V. Buttlar on television and discusses how an American TV family series is now using UFO encounters as a sensational element. The editorial also promises an explanation for the 'Landespur' case from Delphos, presented for the first time in a magazine.

Briefe (Letters)

Page 4 contains a letter from O. Mosbleck and H.W. Peiniger of Lüdenscheid, dated June 1, 1987, reacting to an article by R. Henke about a GEP and CENAP meeting. They express strong disapproval of Henke's article, calling it "obviously drunk" and accusing him of presenting a "pseudoreport completely detached from reality." They state that they will no longer participate in events where Henke is present and will not invite him to their events, urging CENAP to distance itself from Henke.

Following this is an "Offener Brief an die OEP" (Open Letter to the OEP) from R. Henke. Henke defends his report, acknowledging that while the style might be debatable, he provided concrete examples for his criticisms of dilettantism, lack of scientific rigor, opportunism, bureaucracy, and inconsistency. He points out two instances of "unfairness": first, CENAP allegedly leaving a colleague exposed on a TV show ('Fragen Sie Dr. Winter'), and second, JUFOF publishing a study on size estimations (in which CENAP participated significantly) without mentioning CENAP. Henke criticizes JUFOF for accusing V. Buttlar of plagiarism in the same issue where they themselves are accused of similar behavior. He highlights perceived inconsistencies in JUFOF's handling of UFO cases, particularly the Radevormwald case and the CE III Livingston case, which he deems absurdly explained. He contrasts the OEP's tendency to label cases as 'unsolved' with CENAP's more critical approach.

Von vorn bis hinten informativ... (Informative from front to back...)

Page 5 includes a brief note from H. Reese of Herford, stating that his "NIGHT LIGHTS" subscription will be extended and that the magazine is "informative from front to back," though he wishes for more current investigations.

Anmerkung der NL-Redaktion (Note from the NL Editorial Staff)

The editorial staff responds to Reese, explaining that they have no control over the availability of current cases but hopes the May issue satisfied readers, with more cases expected in the summer.

Geschichten-Erzähler (Storyteller)

D. Pflüger of Herne writes, praising "NIGHT LIGHTS" for its excellent presentation and content. He compares another UFO publication, "UFO-Nachrichten" from DUIST, to a "storyteller" with sensational headlines reminiscent of the tabloid "BILD."

(Über-) Kritische Haltung ((Over-) Critical Stance)

S. Steuer of Hamburg agrees with the positive assessment of the new issue's design and topic selection. However, he points out numerous spelling and translation errors, which he feels detract from the claim of scientific rigor. He hopes that increased circulation will lead to financial stability. Steuer appreciates the continued critical stance, preferring it to the uncritical, euphoric attitude of DUIST members.

Historie: Vor 40 Jahren: Sichtung der ersten "Fliegenden Untertasse" – Versuch eines Resumees (History: 40 Years Ago: Sighting of the First "Flying Saucer" – An Attempt at a Summary)

Pages 6-9 delve into the historical context of UFO sightings, focusing on the 40th anniversary of Kenneth Arnold's 1947 sighting. The article begins by stating that while reports of unusual aerial phenomena are as old as humanity, none achieved the significance of Arnold's sighting on June 24, 1947. It mentions earlier waves of sightings, including "Airship Observations" in America (1896-1897), "Ghost Planes" over Scandinavia (1932-1938), "Foo-Fighters" during WWII (1941-1945), and "Ghost Rockets" over Scandinavia in 1947. These earlier waves, however, did not generate lasting public resonance or speculation about extraterrestrial life.

The article details Arnold's sighting: while flying near Mount Ranier, Washington, he observed nine glowing discs moving in formation at an estimated speed of over 1800 km/h and a diameter of about 35 meters. The term "flying saucer" originated from Arnold's description, which the author suggests hindered serious investigation from the outset. The sensational report led to a surge of similar sightings across the country.

Page 7 questions the nature of Arnold's "saucers," suggesting they might have been moon-crescent-shaped objects resembling meteoric phenomena. It links this to an upcoming meteor shower and the possibility that Arnold mistook a fireball event for something else. The article posits that the phenomenon of "flying fireballs" observed across Europe might have been misinterpreted as extraterrestrial craft. It raises the question of whether Arnold's sighting and subsequent observations could be attributed to strong meteor activity, a question CENAP intends to investigate.

The article asserts that Arnold's sighting marked the beginning of a modern myth, perpetuated by two dominant narratives: either UFOs don't exist and are hoaxes, or they are extraterrestrial spacecraft. The latter, being more fascinating, has ensured the myth's longevity.

Page 8 discusses the US Air Force's investigations, including Project Sign and Project Grudge, which concluded in 1949. Project Bluebook, initiated after the 1952 sighting wave, continued until 1969. The article quotes J.A. Hynek, noting the relatively low rank of officers in charge as an indicator of the project's perceived importance. The closure of Bluebook reflected the belief that UFOs posed no threat to the US.

The growth of private investigation groups is noted, driven by public distrust of official explanations. In Germany, three long-standing organizations are mentioned: DUIST (founded 30 years ago by Karl L. Veit), MUFONces (an academic group), and CENAP itself, which claims the largest number of investigated cases. The article critically states that DUIST, despite being the oldest and largest private group, is also the most unserious, having already accepted the existence of what it claims to study, indicating a desire to believe over a desire to know.

None of these organizations claim to have found irrefutable proof of "flying saucers." The article lists numerous reports of landings, abductions, and contactee experiences, along with many blurry UFO photos. It states that no credible image of an extraterrestrial exists, and any existing ones are crude fakes. No extraterrestrial objects have been recovered. Physical traces are limited to scorched ground or pressure marks. Despite this, reports of 'Encounters of the Third Kind' are increasing, particularly in South America. The article notes that no 'messages' from contactees contain information not derivable from Earth. Crucially, it states that no two independent close-encounter reports match in detail, suggesting that no objectively independent phenomenon exists.

Page 9 addresses the lack of evidence. It criticizes those who claim the US Air Force possesses UFO wreckage and bodies, referencing previous "Ms" articles that debunked such claims. The article argues that focusing on sheer numbers ('millions have seen a UFO') is a tactic to substitute quantity for quality. CENAP's analysis of investigated cases has found no evidence pointing to unknown phenomena or extraterrestrial spacecraft. The article concludes that the "UFO dream" has seemingly ended in Germany, with the focus shifting abroad. It finds it curious that German investigators are often contacted by foreign sources seeking information, contributing to Germany's reputation as a "Sighting Country No. 1."

The article suggests that Germans might be too sober compared to more emotional South Americans. It notes that even in the "country of origin" of "flying saucers," spectacular events have ceased. While UFOs, like vampires, may never truly die, public interest has shifted to the broader 'New Age' concept, where subjective feelings of well-being are prioritized over objective proof, as seen in 'miracle healings.'

Despite the shift, CENAP's work is deemed not obsolete as long as 'non-fiction authors' like V. Buttlar profit from old UFO myths.

CENAP in ARD und ZDF (CENAP on ARD and ZDF)

Pages 10-11 describe CENAP's participation in television programs. It was not CENAP's first TV appearance, but it was the first time a CENAP representative spoke on a talk show. The ARD appearance allowed for a more detailed presentation of CENAP's work. The article notes that the superficial talk show format received the most resonance, reflecting a media trend prioritizing appearance over argument. Press reviews criticized the lack of "action" and the need for visual spectacle. The ZDF program relied on CENAP's film material.

The article reveals that the ZDF appearance almost didn't happen because many prominent UFO proponents, including V. Buttlar, refused to participate in a debate with a CENAP representative, fearing confrontation. The author interprets this as a sign of insecurity about their own beliefs. Eventually, a participant was found, leading to a "media-effective" debate.

ZDF: 'So ein Zoff' (ZDF: 'What a Fuss')

This section details CENAP's involvement in the ZDF entertainment show "Mensch ärgere dich nicht" in March 1987. CENAP was interested, and the ZDF responded, initiating contact with CENAP Mannheim. The initial desired participants for a debate were author Johannes v. Buttlar and Karl L. Veit, editor of an old German UFO magazine. However, both declined. A dozen other UFO proponents also refused, not wanting to miss the opportunity to defend their positions before a million-strong audience, with many stating, "No, not with Walter." The article suggests that the fear of public confrontation is significant for the pro-UFO side, as they have their "showcase cases" they don't want to see debunked. The ZDF had not experienced such a situation before, as even politically opposed figures usually agree to joint TV appearances.

CENAP-Gründer Werner Walter im Streitgespräch mit dem Verleger und "UFOlogen" Michael Hesemann (CENAP Founder Werner Walter in a Debate with Publisher and "UFOlogen" Michael Hesemann)

This section, though mentioned on page 10, is not fully transcribed in the provided OCR. It likely refers to the debate mentioned above.

Editorial Stance and Recurring Themes

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO phenomena, the role of media in shaping public perception, and the historical context of UFO sightings. CENAP maintains a skeptical and evidence-based approach, contrasting with what it perceives as uncritical or pseudoscientific stances within the UFO community. The magazine aims to educate the public and debunk misinformation, particularly concerning sensationalized media reports and unsubstantiated claims of extraterrestrial visitation. The issue also highlights the internal dynamics and disagreements within the German UFO research landscape.

Title: Night Lights
Issue: Nr.136
Volume: 6.87
Issue Date: June 1987
Publisher: Night Lights
Country: Germany
Original Language: German

This issue of Night Lights features a critical examination of a televised debate on UFOs and a thorough review of Johannes von Buttlar's book "Leben auf dem Mars" (Life on Mars).

The TV Debate: "So ein Zoff"

The magazine details a TV recording session for the show "So ein Zoff" on May 5th in Munich-Unterföhring. The author, along with Hansjürgen Köhler, arrived late for the recording. The segment featured a debate between Michael Hesemann, editor of "Magazin 2000" and a firm believer in UFOs, and Walter, a UFO skeptic from CENAP. The show also included a segment on smoking versus non-smoking.

The recording process was described as somewhat chaotic, with the moderator, Günther Jauch, fumbling and requiring retakes, extending the recording time to 2.5 hours. The "Zoffometer," a device to measure audience applause, was reportedly calibrated and manipulated to ensure a balanced outcome.

A "UFO" film from August 1972, showing an oval object with a smoke trail over Jackson Lake, Wyoming, was presented. Walter identified it as a natural phenomenon, likely a meteorite, and criticized the sensationalist press for fueling UFO reports. Hesemann, unfamiliar with the film, suggested it needed scientific investigation but maintained that clear UFO sightings and films exist.

The debate also touched upon famous UFO photographs, including the Trent photo (McMinnville, Oregon), which Hesemann vouched for as genuine. Walter countered that the Salem, Massachusetts photo was likely a reflection in a window, a point supported by J.A. Hynek. Hesemann insisted it was a classic UFO photo, authenticated by the "Blue Book" project. Walter also pointed out that a US UFO group had identified the Adamski "lamp" saucer as a model, leading to the group's dissolution due to lack of evidence. Hesemann attributed this to financial reasons.

The Munguzzi photo was also discussed, with Hesemann remaining non-committal despite its creator disavowing it. Hesemann frequently interrupted Walter, leading Walter to interject repeatedly. When asked about the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation, Walter responded dismissively with "Mir ist das wurscht" (I don't care), earning audience laughter. Hesemann, however, treated the question seriously, emphasizing the need for careful investigation.

The article notes that the CENAP explanations were dismissed by Hesemann as arbitrary ("Roulette"). The studio audience overwhelmingly supported CENAP, with their applause audibly reduced in the broadcast. Hesemann, despite having a "psychotherapist" present, was left speechless at the end, contrasting with his earlier verbose demeanor.

After the show, the production team expressed satisfaction, focusing on the "dynamism" and "action" rather than factual content. The author and his companion faced an inconvenient departure from their hotel, having to leave the same night.

Press Criticism

Reviews of the show were mixed, ranging from "entertaining" to "boring" and "annoying." Critiques of the Hesemann-Walter debate highlighted the aggressive nature of the exchange, with Walter's "Obelix-like" demeanor and sharp arguments being singled out as notable. Some critics felt the debate format, with limited time for each side, exacerbated conflict rather than resolving it. The discussion on "Do UFOs Exist?" was described as amusing by some, while others found it a rehash of old arguments.

ARD: Ask Dr. Winter - The GEP's Role

This section details the background to the TV appearance. Initially, the GEP (Gesellschaft zur Erforschung des UFO-Phänänomens) was approached by WDR (West German Television) but declined, citing organizational reasons and the need for a conference. They then suggested CENAP. However, a later explanation in the JUFOF magazine suggested the GEP declined because they felt the show was not a suitable venue for a serious group and recommended Walter instead. The author views the GEP's actions as a deliberate attempt to put CENAP in a difficult position.

31 May: Unbelievable or True?

The TV show's framework was described as low-level "Klamotte" (slapstick/comedy), but CENAP's contribution was not ridiculed. "UFO" film clips were shown, and Walter commented on Rhesus monkey images and party balloon photos. Walter then discussed the Alaska case, offering a surprising solution. A GEP case from November 1984 in Radevormwald was also presented, with the witness, a former confectioner, retiree, and world traveler, interviewed. CENAP had an explanation for this case, which will be reported later.

Filmmaker Klaus Webner demonstrated how hubcaps can be mistaken for flying saucers and how alleged UFO photos are marketed, using examples from "Official UFO" magazine which presented the same Nagora photo series with different stories in different years.

Despite the show's low-brow format, the author felt CENAP was not taken advantage of, but rather the GEP was. New negotiations with the television station were underway.

Book Review: "Die Marsmarchen des Herrn von Buttlar" (The Mars Marches of Mr. von Buttlar)

This section critically analyzes Johannes von Buttlar's book "Leben auf dem Mars" (Life on Mars), which claims evidence of intelligent life on Mars based on NASA's Viking mission photos.

Manipulated Cover Photo

The review begins by scrutinizing the book's cover photo of the "Mars face." It argues that the version used is blurred, unlike a sharper existing image. The author suggests this blurring, along with retouching to soften features and create symmetry, was done to enhance the impression of a face and mislead the reader. The review contrasts the cover image with the original NASA photo, highlighting the artificial enhancements.

Where are the "Details"?

The review questions the captions accompanying the Mars photos in the book. It states that the descriptions of features like eyes, pupils, hairlines, mouths, noses, and chins are not visible in the black-and-white reproductions. The author accuses von Buttlar of deception and wonders why hundreds of thousands of readers accept such claims, attributing it to a "science-worship" mentality where people unquestioningly accept anything presented as scientific fact.

The Esoteric "Hook" for von Buttlar's "Proof"

The review examines the evidence von Buttlar presents for his theory of an ancient Martian civilization. It finds the evidence lacking and notes that von Buttlar fills this gap with a personal anecdote from 1960, where he claims to have met an Aboriginal medicine man in the Australian bush. This medicine man allegedly read his thoughts and led him to a cave where he explained the origin of mysterious rock paintings, pointing to Mars as the home of ancient "wise beings."

The author compares this anecdote to Castaneda's fantasy books and suggests it is likely a fabrication. This personal experience is presented as a "key piece of evidence" for von Buttlar's hypothesis.

The Sources of Mr. von Buttlar

The review criticizes von Buttlar's bibliography, stating that it lacks scientific literature and relies heavily on popular literature. This leads to a phenomenon where popular authors essentially copy from each other. The review notes the absence of geological literature regarding the "Mars face" and questions why von Buttlar, if a serious scientist, did not consult geologists. It also suggests that if von Buttlar, an astrophysicist, relied solely on DiPietro, Molenaar, and his own judgment, his credibility is questionable.

Furthermore, the review points out that von Buttlar uses questionable "esoteric" sources without naming them. For example, his claims about Atlantis are linked to the readings of Edgar Cayce, whose prophecies have not been confirmed. The author questions why von Buttlar omits these sources, possibly to maintain his "scientific" image. The review concludes by noting that von Buttlar also recycles "pre-astronautic" evidence from E.v. Däniken.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Night Lights demonstrates a critical and skeptical approach to claims of UFOs and extraterrestrial life, particularly when presented without rigorous scientific evidence. The magazine scrutinizes media portrayals of UFO phenomena, highlighting potential manipulation and sensationalism. The review of von Buttlar's book strongly criticizes the author's methodology, reliance on dubious sources, and alleged image manipulation, advocating for a more evidence-based and scientifically sound approach to such topics. The editorial stance appears to favor critical inquiry and a debunking of unsubstantiated claims, while acknowledging the public's fascination with these subjects.

Title: Night Lights
Issue: Nr. 136
Volume: 6.87
Date: June 1987
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German
Cover Headline: Von Buttlar - ein Plagiator ? (Von Buttlar - a Plagiarist ?)

This issue of Night Lights features a lengthy and critical review of J.v. Buttlar's book "Leben auf dem Mars" (Life on Mars). The review, titled "Von Buttlar - ein Plagiator ?", accuses Buttlar of lacking scientific rigor, presenting unverified claims, and plagiarizing the work of others, particularly Walter Hain.

Critique of J.v. Buttlar's "Leben auf dem Mars"

The review begins by stating that Buttlar's book offers nothing fundamentally new, recycling ideas and examples that have been previously published, often decades earlier, by other authors. The central thesis of the review is that Buttlar's work is not original and relies heavily on unproven assertions, failing to provide adequate source citations. The author of the review expresses frustration with Buttlar's alleged disregard for scientific principles, particularly the need to cite sources for extraordinary claims.

Chaotic Structure and Filler Content

The review criticizes the book's structure, describing it as "chaotic" and filled with extraneous material. After an esoteric introduction about an "Australian bush" encounter, Buttlar allegedly revives "paleo-astronautic" clichés, including references to pyramid findings and Australian rock paintings. The review disputes Buttlar's interpretations of these rock paintings, which he claims depict our solar system and spiral flying objects, calling them an "insult to common sense" and questioning how Buttlar perceives his readers.

Questionable Evidence and Theories

Several specific examples are highlighted to illustrate Buttlar's alleged lack of credibility:

• The "Hammer" Find: The review discusses an alleged artifact found in Glen Rose, Texas, claimed to be a hammer from the time of dinosaurs. Despite Buttlar mentioning scientific institutes that supposedly investigated it, no sources are provided. The chemical analysis of the artifact (96% iron, 2.6% chlorine, 0.74% sulfur) is presented as evidence of a natural origin, specifically iron chloride and iron sulfide, which are found in natural iron deposits. The review dismisses the idea that this could be a man-made tool, especially given the unusual composition and the lack of carbon or silicon.
• The "Dropa" Discs: A photograph of alleged "granite discs" found in a cave in the Bayan Kara Ula mountains is presented. The caption claims these discs are inscribed with writing from the "Dropas," who supposedly came from Mars 12,000 years ago. The review points out that the photo is misleading, showing the discs lying on textile fabric, not granite. Furthermore, the discs are described as being much smaller (under 10 cm diameter, under 1 cm thick) than stated in Buttlar's book, lack any visible inscriptions, and are likely made of jade, not granite. The review questions how such discs could have been made from granite without advanced tools.
• Mars Research and "Mars Face": Buttlar dedicates a significant portion of his book to historical and modern Mars research, which the review sees as filler content. His speculation about the Big Bang, the formation of the solar system, and the origin of life is criticized for not connecting back to the "life on Mars" theme. The review also mentions the theory of panspermia (life originating elsewhere and seeding Earth) and criticizes Buttlar for doubting established evolutionary theories while citing Hoyle and Wickramasinghe.
• Cheops Pyramid: Buttlar's claim of secret chambers in the Cheops Pyramid is dismissed as a debunked theory from 1968.
• Human History and Mars: The review notes that Buttlar presents a "fantastic outline" of human cultural history, citing fringe figures like O.H. Muck and G.v. Haßler, but still fails to connect it to Mars.
• 10th Planet Theory: Buttlar's speculation about a 10th planet is mentioned, along with theories about catastrophes caused by meteor impacts, which the review finds unoriginal.
• Mars Inhabitants' Motives: Buttlar's explanation for the "giant structures" on Mars, linking them to a "lost paradise" culture, is called a "fairy tale" and compared to a prehistoric drawing.
• Earth's Axis Tilt: The review questions Buttlar's understanding of astrophysics when he suggests that meteor impacts could have tilted Earth's axis.
• Contradictions: The review highlights contradictions within Buttlar's own arguments, such as claiming life's origin is improbable in one chapter and then asserting its high probability in another.

Plagiarism Allegations and Walter Hain

A significant portion of the review is dedicated to Walter Hain, who claims that Buttlar's "latest open theses" are also not original. Hain recounts seeing Buttlar on a TV show presenting "Mars phenomena" that Hain had previously published in his own book, "Wir, vom Mars" (We, from Mars), in 1979. Hain states that Buttlar never contacted him, despite clearly having access to his work. Hain's book covered topics such as the "Mars face," Tassili rock paintings, Glen Rose footprints, "Mars canals," and the Viking missions. Hain had even created a model of the "Mars face" in 1977 to demonstrate how shadows could create the illusion of a face, and this model was photographed and published in his book. Buttlar, in contrast, claimed on TV that Hain's photo was a manipulation and not real, calling it a "the second Mars face" discovered in the "Utopia" region.

Hain also notes that the background image on the cover of Buttlar's book is the same as the sunset image on the cover of his own book, albeit mirrored. Buttlar's book only cites American researchers V. DiPietro and G. Molenaar for the "Mars face," claiming they discovered it in 1980 in the NASA archives, ignoring Hain's earlier work.

Conclusion of the Review

The review concludes by summarizing the main criticisms:

1. Nothing in Buttlar's book is new or particularly original.
2. The most important claims are not supported by source citations.
3. Claims are made that are demonstrably false and contradict presented visual material.
4. Buttlar does not honor his profession as an astrophysicist, attempting to support his theses with long-disproven theories.

The review also touches upon the issue of "conscious deception" regarding the use of images without proper attribution, particularly in the case of the "Dropa" discs photograph.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine "Night Lights" clearly adopts a critical stance towards pseudoscientific claims and authors who, in their view, lack academic integrity. The editorial stance is one of skepticism towards sensationalist theories presented without solid evidence or proper sourcing. The review of Buttlar's book is an example of the magazine's commitment to debunking what it perceives as unscientific or fraudulent material in the realm of ufology and ancient astronaut theories. The recurring themes are the importance of scientific methodology, the necessity of verifiable evidence, and the critique of plagiarism and misrepresentation in popular science literature.

Title: Night Lights
Issue: 6.87 - Nr. 136
Date: June 1987
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of Night Lights features several articles critically examining UFO phenomena, alleged plagiarism, and the debunking of famous UFO cases. It includes detailed timelines, photographic analysis, and reader contributions.

"Marsgesicht" Controversy: Plagiarism Allegations

The lead article focuses on a dispute between Walter Hain and V. Buttlar concerning the "Marsgesicht" (Mars Face) image. Hain accuses V. Buttlar of plagiarizing his work, including photographic material and ideas, without proper credit. Hain details how the "Mars Face" was broadcast by ORF in 1976, and he obtained a photo print in May 1977, which was also featured in his book. He claims V. Buttlar, despite being part of the same 'AAS' scene, denied knowing Hain or his book, yet subsequently used Hain's concepts and images, even labeling them as a 'hoax'. Hain mentions that V. Buttlar's book 'Sie kommen von fremden Sternen' (1986) features the 'Mars Face' image. The article also notes that V. Buttlar's claims were presented on TV shows like 'Unglaubliche Geschichten' (RTL-plus) where he allegedly called Hain's model photo a forgery. Hain has initiated legal action and demanded retractions. The article provides a chronological timeline of events related to the 'Mars Face' from 1976 to 1987, highlighting V. Buttlar's publications and media appearances, as well as the rejection of Hain's manuscript by Herbig-Verlag in 1977.

"Mars Pyramids" and Other Allegations

The article further critiques V. Buttlar's work by examining the "Mars Pyramids" theory, which suggests a half-collapsed pyramid near the 'Mars Face'. Hain calculates the 'wall thickness' to be around 200 meters, questioning the credibility of such claims. Another example of alleged misrepresentation by V. Buttlar involves figures from Val Camonica, Italy, depicted as 'astronaut-like' figures armed with bows and arrows. Hain points out that this image was used on the cover of a 1969 book by P. Kolossimos, 'Sie kamen vom anderen Stern', and criticizes V. Buttlar for not providing a source and for presenting it as his own discovery.

The Retouched Reality: The "Silbermann" Photo Debunked

This section delves into the famous "Silbermann" photo, widely believed to be a genuine UFO encounter. A reader of the Danish UFO journal UFO-NYT, Claus Westh-Henrichsen, a commercial artist and retoucher, provides a detailed explanation of how the photo was fabricated. He describes the process of combining elements from different photographs, such as a family with a stroller and a circus group, to create the illusion of a spaceman ('X') interacting with two other figures ('A' and 'B'). Westh-Henrichsen explains that he tested similar photo manipulations in 1959. The analysis highlights inconsistencies in the lighting, shadows, and perspective of the 'Silbermann' photo, suggesting it is a composite. The article also notes that the women in the photo might have been from a 1949 grocery price discussion, and the 'spaceman' figure was likely a retouched circus performer.

UFO Sightings in Germany

Two UFO sightings are reported from Germany:

1. Neuberg-Ravolzhausen/Marköbel, Germany (August 7, 1980): A reader, after studying Elisabeth Klarer's book 'Erlebnisse jenseits der Lichtmauer', reported seeing a disk-like flying object, approximately 30 meters in diameter, flying at an altitude of 1000-1500 meters.
2. Marköbel, Germany (August 29, 1980): The same reader observed a cylindrical flying object with hemispherical ends, about 10 meters long, flying slowly at an altitude of 300 meters over children flying kites. The object was dark, without any shine, and made no noise.

Sketches of both objects are provided.

"Solar Zeppelins" as UFO Stimuli

An article discusses the observation of an object by soldiers in Osnabrück in 1980, which was initially thought to be a UFO. Subsequent analysis revealed it to be a 'Solar Zeppelin', a zeppelin-shaped, approximately 3-meter-long hot air balloon, possibly related to a youth comic magazine. The article references a report from the DUIST-Zeitung UFO Nachrichten (April/May 1983) about a reader who sharpened his UFO observation skills after reading Elisabeth Klarer's book and subsequently reported two sightings of 'extraterrestrial intelligent beings' in 1980.

UFOs in US Television: "Dallas"

The magazine notes the integration of science fiction elements, specifically a UFO abduction, into the popular US family TV series "Dallas". It speculates on the potential public reaction in Germany when these episodes are broadcast, expressing concern about potential hysteria but acknowledging the strong emotional identification viewers have with such series.

"Landing Traces" in Delphos Explained

An article titled "Endgültige Erklärung für 'Lande'spuren von Delphos ?" (Final Explanation for 'Landing Traces' from Delphos?) revisits the analysis of a soil sample from an alleged UFO landing site. The chemical analysis revealed high percentages of Calcium (50%), Potassium (25%), and Magnesium (22%), along with trace amounts of Manganese, Iron, Zinc, and Copper. The article concludes that these mineral ratios strongly suggest the traces are from fertilizer residues, possibly including nitrogen-containing ammonium salts. The author, R. Henke of CENAP Heidelberg, states that the case can be solved without extensive on-site research, simply by analyzing the data.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue demonstrates a critical and investigative approach to UFO phenomena. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards sensational claims and a commitment to debunking hoaxes and misrepresentations, particularly concerning the "Mars Face" and the "Silbermann" photo. The magazine actively promotes rigorous analysis and fact-checking, even when dealing with potentially controversial topics. There is a clear emphasis on exposing plagiarism and providing evidence-based explanations. The publication also highlights the importance of independent research and critical thinking in the field of ufology, as evidenced by the detailed analysis of various cases and the encouragement for readers to question and investigate.

Title: Night Light
Issue: 6.87 – Nr. 136
Date: June 1987

This issue of Night Light magazine delves into the intersection of science fiction, television, and real-world phenomena, with a particular focus on UFOs and extraterrestrial encounters.

UFOs Enter Prime Time Television

The lead article explores the increasing presence of science fiction elements, specifically UFOs and aliens, in popular American television series. It notes that while Germany has been hesitant to incorporate such themes into its dramas, American shows are embracing them, partly to combat declining viewership. The article highlights the series 'The Colbys', a spin-off of 'Dallas', which featured an alien encounter as a season finale cliffhanger. The production hired John Dykstra, known for his work on 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' and 'Star Wars', to create special effects, reportedly costing $500,000 per minute of screen time.

The magazine suggests that UFO sightings are becoming a common topic of conversation in the US, with many Americans, including former President Jimmy Carter, claiming to have seen one. It also references past UFO-related incidents in the US, such as those in Dorla, Warminster, and Wanaque Reservoir, which reportedly caused public disruptions.

The article details the specific alien encounter episode of 'The Colbys', where the character Fallon witnesses a metallic spaceship emerge from a bright light in the Colorado woods. The episode concludes with an alien appearing from the spacecraft, leaving viewers anticipating the next season.

Astronomical Forecast

This section provides an outlook on celestial events for June and July. It anticipates that Jupiter will be a prominent object, becoming visible before midnight and throughout the night. Saturn will also be observable, though its brightness will diminish in July. Other planets like Venus and Mars are expected to be practically invisible during this period. The forecast also mentions the expectation of 3 to 4 meteor shower streams, with peaks around June 20th and 27th, and another around July 27th. The July showers are noted for potentially containing slower, more visible objects, with activity beginning around mid-July.

Short Reports and Events

Debunked Apparition in Hanover: A brief report from Hanover, Pennsylvania, details a supposed 'Virgin Mary apparition' that appeared as a glowing image on a house wall. The article explains that this phenomenon was actually a reflection from a convex window, debunking the claims of a miracle and the resulting hysteria among some residents.

GEP and CENAP Controversy: The magazine mentions an ongoing controversy between GEP and CENAP, with GEP having submitted a detailed statement in response to criticism from Rudolf Henke. This statement is promised to be published in full in the next issue.

Upcoming Events: Information is provided about the '1. Internationale Para Tage' (International Para Days) event, scheduled to take place in Mannheim from October 16th to 18th, 1987. The event, organized by PRO HUMANITAS MANNHEIM, will cover topics such as 'Border Areas of Science', including wonders, mysticism, phenomena, firewalking, clairvoyance, spiritual healing, UFOs, and pendulums. Several notable speakers are listed, including Prof. Erich Möller, Erich v. Däniken, Peter and Johannes Fiebag, Dr. M. Steinhardt, Dr. Eva Billand, and W. J. Langbein. Three-day tickets are expected to cost approximately 50 DM.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Night Light magazine demonstrates a clear interest in phenomena that blur the lines between entertainment, popular belief, and scientific inquiry. The editorial stance appears to be one of reporting on these topics, including both sensational aspects (like TV show plots) and more grounded analyses (like debunking hoaxes and providing astronomical data). There is a critical yet engaged approach to UFO reports and paranormal claims, as evidenced by the inclusion of both speculative content and factual reporting. The magazine also highlights upcoming events and ongoing debates within the ufology and paranormal research communities.