CENAP Report - No 128

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP-REPORT
Issue: Nr.128
Date: October 11, 1986
Publisher: CENAP (Centrales Erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher Phänomene)
Country: Germany
Language: German

CENAP: Central Research Network for Extraordinary Phenomena

CENAP is presented as a private, non-commercial organization dedicated to the serious, factual, and critical study, analysis, and evaluation of the UFO phenomenon. The organization aims to demythologize and identify the phenomenon by examining its physical manifestations and socio-psychological impacts. CENAP also investigates the societal effects of 'UFO beliefs' and how they are portrayed in the mass media. They affirm the existence of the UFO phenomenon and the necessity of its serious research.

CENAP REPORT (CR)

The monthly publication CENAP REPORT (CR) provides ongoing coverage of current events and the latest research findings on UFOs. It features documentaries, case studies with authentic material, and discussions on the public UFO debate. CR takes a clear stance and offers commentary.

The publication also includes the Luxembourgish publication INFO-CEPS by Gilbert Schmitz. A yearly subscription to CR costs DM 35.--, payable to Werner Walter in Mannheim via a Postgiro account in Ludwigshafen.

Article: ALTER UFO-SCHINKEN IM CR, 2.TEIL (Old UFO Ham in CR, Part 2) - Cedric Allingham

This extensive article, written by Werner Walter of CENAP-Mannheim, thoroughly investigates the Cedric Allingham case, which gained notoriety in 1954 with the publication of his book 'Flying Saucer from Mars.' The author begins by addressing reader inquiries about whether he had joined the ranks of 'contactee' fans, assuring them that this report would reveal the 'thick end' of the Allingham case.

The article details how the Allingham case was featured in Peter G. Westphal's 1968 book 'UFO UFO,' where the UFO was compared to a 'spinning top' or a 'telephone microphone.' Westphal questioned whether the images were genuine, staged for attention, a clever montage, or simply the product of someone's imagination.

Walter references previous CENAP REPORT SPECIAL issues that analyzed 'UFO contactee books' and 'UFO manipulation.' He notes that typical UFOlogy cult figures like Adamski, Fry, and Menger have been exposed, and now turns his attention to Allingham.

Walter explains that after a long period of silence, he contacted Christopher Allan in England in late 1985. Allan revealed that the Cedric Allingham case was a hoax, written by astronomer Patrick Moore as a prank to fool thousands of UFO believers. Allan stated that 'Allingham' never existed.

Further correspondence with Allan in December 1985 indicated that he was conducting research with a colleague to publish the findings. Allan mentioned that the real person behind the story was unwilling to come forward, making it a difficult claim to substantiate.

The article then delves into Patrick Moore's background, noting his prolific writing on astronomy (over 60 books) and his reputation as a prankster who often mocked UFOs and ufologists. Moore apparently attempted to 'improve' upon the work of Leslie and Adamski. The article suggests that the information in the Allingham book requiring astronomical expertise was a clue pointing to Moore.

Moore was the only person who claimed to know Allingham. Allingham himself reportedly disappeared without a trace, with rumors of him dying in a Swiss sanatorium. Many phrases and quotes in the Allingham book were found to be identical to those in Moore's writings, though this might be less apparent in the German translation.

Frederick Muller, the London publisher, was aware of the author's identity and confirmed the book was a hoax, with a friend of Moore's (a journalist) helping to write the original text. The disguised figure in the Allingham book was identified as this journalist. The telescope shown was Moore's own, located in his garden observatory. This entire affair is described as a superb and clever hoax.

The article mentions Waveney Girvan's book 'Flying Saucers & Common Sense,' which also discusses how people were fooled. It is noted that Girvan was instrumental in publishing Adamski's first book in 1953. Moore was also a friend of Desmond Leslie, with whom he co-authored a book not related to UFOs.

Stephen Darbishire's photographs, allegedly of the Allingham UFO, are discussed. The article questions why Leonard Cramp only used one of Darbishire's photos for comparison, implying the second photo did not match Adamski's evidence.

Page 5 features a partial translation of a 'Daily Mail' article from October 11, 1954, titled 'A FLYING SAUCER COMES TO EARTH - The Man from Mars Left No Address' by J. Stubbs Walker. This article describes Cedric Allingham's claim of meeting a man from Mars near Lossiemouth, Scotland, in February 1954. The 'man from Mars' allegedly communicated via sign language and sketches, revealing himself to be from Mars, not Venus, and explaining that the canals on Mars were man-made for irrigation. The article notes that the 'spaceman' was tall, graceful, and tanned, and that the flying saucer was made of polished aluminium. It also mentions a local fisherman, James Duncan, who allegedly witnessed the encounter, but who could not be traced by the publishers or the Daily Mail.

Page 6 contains clippings from the 'Northern Scot & Moray and Nairn Express' dated October 30, 1954, and October 16, 1954. The October 30th article, 'Was It Another Flying Saucer? COASTGUARD SEES WEIRD PHENOMENON,' reports on a second sighting by coastguard O. Cordell of a bright green orb. The October 16th article, 'AUTHOR CLAIMS "FLYING SAUCER" LANDED NEAR BUCKIE,' summarizes Allingham's book and his alleged encounter, mentioning James Duncan as a witness who could not be located. It also notes that Allingham is traveling to America to meet George Adamski.

Page 7 continues the investigation, stating that 'Flying Saucers from Mars' became a bestseller among UFO enthusiasts. Efforts to locate Allingham were difficult; he was initially reported to be on a lecture tour in the USA, then became seriously ill, and was rumored to have died in 1956. James Duncan, the sole witness, also remained untraceable. Journalist Robert Chapman concluded in his book 'UFO' that Allingham never existed and the story was a major UFO hoax in England. Chapman discovered that a man who supported the author had given a lecture to a UFO group in Kent. The book's author was depicted with a 10-inch refractor telescope in his garden in Yorkshire. The article posits that the author knew a lot about astronomy and was connected to the British Interplanetary Society and the British Astronomical Association. It suggests the author was a member of BIS and BIA and familiar with the work of lunar researchers like H. Percy Wilkins and Patrick Moore. However, Allingham's name did not appear on membership lists. Similarities were found between Allingham's writing style and Moore's, with numerous references in Moore's papers to Allingham. In his book 'Can You Speak Venusian,' Moore claimed to have met Allingham at a UFO club meeting.

Page 8 further explores the stylistic analysis. It notes that Moore is known as a prankster and admitted to fabricating a UFO sighting to test local newspaper reactions. He also sent prank letters to a magazine. The article discusses the 'stylometry' technique, developed by A.Q. Morton and the University of Edinburgh, which analyzes writing patterns to determine authorship. This method compares samples of text to identify unique stylistic markers.

Page 9 details the stylometry tests conducted. Initial tests showed no significant differences between the writings of Allingham and Arthur C. Clarke, leading to speculation that Clarke might have written the book. Clarke denied this, referencing his long fight against UFO nonsense and stating he had never seen 'Flying Saucers from Mars.' Further computer-aided comparisons revealed rarer stylistic patterns that differentiated Allingham and Clarke, supporting Clarke's denial. However, the stylometry tests also indicated that Moore was not the author, creating a contradiction. The article mentions that three members of the Tunbridge Wells UFO club attended an 'Allingham' lecture in January 1955. One recalled the speaker having an assistant, and the speaker later claimed to be ill and disappeared. The publisher, Muller, Blond and White, refused to reveal the author's identity but offered to forward correspondence. A letter addressed to 'Allingham' was returned unopened, marked 'Not known here for the last twelve years.' However, the publisher forwarded the letter to Peter Davies in Oxted, Surrey, which led to the discovery of Davies' name. Davies confirmed his involvement in the matter, stating the book was originally written by someone else who needed to conceal the prank.

Page 10 concludes the investigation. It states that Davies admitted to being the masked person in the book and the 'assistant' at the Tunbridge Wells lecture. He also claimed to be an old friend of Patrick Moore. It is suggested that Moore was the original lecturer and Davies rewrote the book, which Moore intended to release as the Allingham story. This rewriting explains why stylometry failed to definitively link Moore as the author, although some of Moore's phrases and quirks remained. Davies lacked specialized astronomical knowledge, retaining Moore's distinctive use of words like 'Cro-Magnard' and references to Plato's 'Kritias.' A further confirmation of Moore's authorship comes from a photo in the book showing the author with a telescope, which matches the one in Moore's 'The Observer's Book of Astronomy' (1962) and the garden setting. The article concludes that the Allingham case is a hoax, possibly intended to demonstrate how easily contactee stories can be circulated, with Moore having skillfully used Adamski's book as inspiration. The case remains an open secret, with Moore neither confirming nor denying his involvement.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the exposure of UFO hoaxes, the critical analysis of UFO claims and contactee narratives, and the investigation of authorship through scientific methods like stylometry. CENAP's editorial stance is clearly one of skepticism towards unsubstantiated UFO claims, advocating for rigorous research and factual evidence to demythologize the phenomenon. They aim to provide a critical perspective on UFOlogy and its cultural impact.

Title: MAGONIA
Issue: 23
Volume: 4
Date: July 1986
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of Magonia delves into the complex world of UFO literature and sightings, featuring an in-depth investigation into the authorship of early UFO books, a detailed report on a specific UFO incident in Germany, and a psychological analysis of UFO witnesses.

Flying Saucers from Moore's?

This lead article by Christopher Allan and Steuart Campbell critically examines the origins and authorship of influential UFO books from the mid-20th century. It begins by referencing the 1953 publication of George Adamski's 'Flying Saucers Have Landed', co-authored with Desmond Leslie, which brought Adamski's claims of extraterrestrial contact to public attention. The article highlights the publisher's role in promoting these narratives. It then scrutinizes the claims and works associated with figures like Cedric Allingham and Patrick Moore, questioning the authenticity and provenance of certain UFO accounts and photographs. The authors present evidence suggesting that some widely circulated images, such as the frontispiece of 'Flying Saucers from Mars' attributed to Cedric Allingham, were actually photographs of Peter Davies with Patrick Moore's telescope, and that images from Moore's own astronomy books were misrepresented. The article references works by Leslie & Adamski (1953), Allingham (1954), Chapman (1969), and Moore (1977, 1954), indicating a pattern of interconnectedness and potential misattribution within the UFO literature of the era.

Die Kosmische Bestimmung... der Menschheit

This philosophical piece by Clemens Nissen explores humanity's place in the cosmos and its potential 'cosmic destiny'. Nissen questions whether humanity is condemned to immortality or if this is merely a self-deceptive fantasy. He contrasts human ambition with the natural cycles of life and death, noting how humans have sought to distance themselves from their biological origins and the natural world. The author discusses the human tendency to taboo death and biological reproduction, creating artificial ideals of beauty and significance. Nissen argues that while humans have emancipated themselves from nature, this has led to environmental exploitation and a dangerous pursuit of power, exemplified by the transition from hunters to drivers of cars and from stone-throwers to atom bomb carriers. He posits that true freedom begins where instinct and basic needs are transcended, allowing for choice and self-determination. The article touches upon the development of intelligence and morality as uniquely human traits that, unlike animalistic drives, can regulate desires and promote peace over conflict. It suggests that humanity's drive for civilization and the potential for intercontinental cooperation might be steps towards a 'cosmic destiny', but questions whether human cultural capacity has limits that could prevent this ultimate step. The piece concludes by contemplating whether humanity can sustain itself on its home planet until it is ready to 'fly the coop', warning of a potential regression to a primitive state if an apocalypse occurs.

Ergebnisse zur Psychologie von UFO-Beobachtern: "Der unidentifizierte Augenzeuge"

This section presents findings from a study on UFO observers conducted by Dr. Alexander Keul and Ken Phillips, based on an article from the 'Journal of Transient Aerial Phenomena'. The research involved over 50 Austrian and British UFO observers, using a questionnaire ('Anamnese') to gather demographic and biographical data. The primary question was whether significant differences exist between these observers and the general population regarding psychosocial details. The study found statistically significant differences in age and anomalous sensory perception (ASW) experiences. Austrian distant UFO observers tended to be older, while British observers reported a higher frequency of ASW events, which often occurred prior to the UFO observation. Close encounter witnesses reported a wider range of phenomena, including precognition, psychokinesis, telepathy, out-of-body experiences, healings, apparitions, and automatic writing, with many experiencing these repeatedly. This suggests a higher 'ASW-Potential' among close encounter witnesses.

The study also employed the Rorschach inkblot test to analyze the observers' 'object relations' – their psychoanalytic view of their relationship with their own bodies, others, and the environment. The results indicated that UFO observers, particularly those reporting close encounters, showed significantly fewer developed object relations compared to a general US population sample and even to a US psychiatric patient group. This suggests a tendency towards more primitive, regressive fantasy content among these witnesses. The authors conclude that these findings support the view that UFO phenomena should not be automatically separated from the psychosozial reality of the witness, their life history, and fantasy activity, and treated solely as 'hard data'.

UFO-Beobachtungen in Püttlingen, 30.7.1986: "Wie in einem Science Fiction Film"

This article by Rudolf Henke reports on a UFO sighting in Püttlingen, Germany, on the evening of July 30, 1986. The incident began when Karin and Franz-Josef Klein observed three unidentified flying objects above the local church tower around 10:45 PM. Initially disbelieving, they sought confirmation from the local police, who also witnessed the phenomena through binoculars. The objects were described as large, round discs that changed color from white to green and blue, and moved irregularly. They were visible for about 15 minutes before disappearing. The police officers noted that the objects were unlike conventional aircraft and expressed surprise at their prolonged presence. The report mentions an investigation by hobby rocket builder Peer Kreutzer, who suggested a possible connection to a 1960s US Air Force helicopter model, though this model never flew. Another theory considered was the testing of a secret US fighter jet (F-19) that might have radar-absorbing properties, requiring round or rounded shapes. The article notes the objects' unusual characteristics, including their color changes and apparent rotation, and the fact that they were seen by multiple witnesses, including police.

Later, Herr Klein observed two additional bright objects in the southwest, described as twinkling in various colors and appearing to rotate on their own axis. One of these objects seemed elliptical. When the police arrived around 11 PM, the main bright object had already vanished, but the other two were still visible and described as 'star-sized' and 'constantly stationary'. The police officer also observed movements, describing one object as 'falling down' and then 'rising again', and another as a 'rotating disc'. The officer regretted missing the primary, brightest object, which Herr Klein described as being 'like from a Sci-Fi film'. The report concludes by stating that the objects were seen again by Herr Klein on subsequent evenings and that the case gained local media attention through the Saarbrücker Zeitung.

The CENAP research section summarizes the Klein couple's observations, detailing the main object's color (white), location (just above the horizon, west), duration (approx. 5 minutes per disappearance behind church towers), time visible (22:30 to at least 22:45), size (half the moon's size), and shape (circular with rotating lights). The secondary objects were described as colorful, higher than the main object, in a line, with one in the SW. Their movements were observed through binoculars, and they appeared stationary otherwise. The report notes that the objects were still visible when the police arrived.

Neues von Woody

A comic strip titled 'Neues von Woody' (News from Woody) is included, featuring a dialogue between characters about job loss and finding a place to stay.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of Magonia are the critical examination of UFO literature and its historical context, the psychological profiles of UFO witnesses, and the detailed reporting of specific UFO sightings. The editorial stance appears to be one of rigorous inquiry, seeking to debunk sensationalism and understand the phenomena through a combination of historical analysis, psychological investigation, and factual reporting. The magazine aims to provide a more grounded and analytical perspective on UFO topics, questioning established narratives and exploring the complexities of witness testimony and its interpretation.

This issue of "SAARLAND aktuell," dated September 3, 1986, published by Saarbrücker Zeitung, focuses on demystifying UFO sightings, particularly the "Ufo-Spuk im Köllertal." The cover headline boldly states that the 'UFO Spuk in Köllertal' has an explanation.

The Köllertal UFO Spuk Explained

The main article details the investigation into the "Ufo-Spuk im Köllertal" by the "Centrale Netz zur Erforschung außergewöhnlicher Himmelsphänomene" (CENAP), based in Mannheim. The case involved a Püttlingen couple who reported seeing "unexplained aerial phenomena," described as large round discs with green-white-blue lights, which were also observed by the local police. CENAP, after examining the case, concluded that the sightings were a misidentification of the planet Venus. The article explains that the bright planet, combined with two nearby stars, created the illusion of a "colorful effect." CENAP claims a high success rate in explaining UFO cases, with 95% of their 300 investigated cases being resolved.

The investigation involved detailed calculations, including determining the distance to the object, its elevation angle, and its direction. Using astronomical data and computer programs, CENAP identified the brightest object in the sky at the time as Venus. The article highlights the witnesses' descriptions, such as a "half-moon sized object with rotating lights," and explains how these could be optical illusions or misinterpretations of celestial bodies. The calculations involved determining the declination and right ascension of the object, and it was found that Venus, at a declination of 4 degrees around 22:30, matched the witnesses' description.

The article also addresses other potential misidentifications, such as stars appearing as "star-like objects" with "rotating lights." It explains that atmospheric refraction can distort the appearance of celestial bodies, especially near the horizon, and that the quality of binoculars can also play a role. The "rotating lights" effect is attributed to the twinkling of stars, which can be mistaken for movement. The size estimations by witnesses are also noted as being prone to significant error.

International UFO Reports

Beyond the Köllertal case, the magazine features several other UFO reports:

United Kingdom Sightings

• Newcastle, August 4, 1985: An elderly woman reported seeing a brilliant white light in the sky that moved slowly, then quickly eastward. The observation lasted three minutes.
• Newcastle, August 22, 1985: The same woman reported a similar light that lasted until 4:20 AM.
• Sheffield, July 14, 1985: A mother and son observed a bright, stationary object with red and green colors and a white center. A neighbor also saw the light, which was later identified as a bright star.
• Bradford, December 18, 1985: Two friends witnessed a bright white light that approached from the south, disappeared behind a cloud, and then reappeared, hovering before moving towards Otley with a pulsating light. This was later identified as a misidentified aircraft.

Chilean UFO Cases

The magazine dedicates a significant section to UFO activity in Chile, drawing from the MUFON UFO JOURNAL and articles by J. Antonio Huneeus.

• August 17, 1985: Approximately two million people in Central Chile observed two UFOs for several hours. These objects were described as distinct, slow-moving, and largely stationary lights. The sightings were filmed by national TV and photographed by astronomers from the University of Chile. They were also detected on radar at Santiago's Comodoro Benitez International Airport. The official explanation from the Air Force-Weather Bureau was that they were weather balloons, but this was deemed unlikely. One object might have been a French research balloon, but the second remained unidentified.
• January 6, 1986: Another UFO was sighted in Santiago and photographed by a reporter.

The article discusses the history of UFO interest in Chile, noting that reports emerged in the 1950s. It highlights the lack of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) equivalent in Chile, which hinders access to potential military evidence. Several individuals and groups involved in UFO research in Chile are mentioned, including:

• Patricio Varela: A radio host with 20 years of experience interviewing UFO witnesses and experts.
• Fernando Noel: An astronomer at the University of Chile who became interested in UFOs after observing a formation.
• Hugo Correa: A science fiction author and columnist who previously led the UFO-Chile group.
• Andres Rojas Murphy: A journalist who leads the SF Club of Chile.
• Hugo Pacheco: Leads the Centro de Investigaciones OVNI (CIO), a group with 25-50 members that has developed a religious undertone.
• Luis Riquelme and Aquiles Castillo: Leading the ORION group, which split from CIO and focuses on technical aspects.

The Chilean government's aviation authority, Civil Aeronautics, has shown interest in UFOs, publishing articles in its magazine "Informacion Aeronautica" about sightings between 1972 and 1985. Military personnel have also been involved in significant UFO cases in Chile.

Study: The Encyclopedia of UFOs

Werner Walter reviews Ronald D. Story's "THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF UFOS." The review notes that the book lists 230 UFO groups worldwide. It highlights that 80% of these groups publish a journal, often for economic reasons. The review points out that 132 groups focus on 25 "contactee" figures, suggesting that over 57% of UFO groups exist primarily due to belief in contactees. The author suggests that public interest in UFOs is driven by the search for speculative extraterrestrial mysteries, rather than serious research.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the demystification of UFO sightings through scientific investigation and rational explanation. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical of sensationalist UFO claims, favoring explanations based on known astronomical phenomena, optical illusions, and misidentifications. The Köllertal case serves as a prime example of how a seemingly extraordinary event can be explained by mundane, albeit sometimes overlooked, natural occurrences. The magazine encourages readers to approach UFO phenomena with a critical and analytical mindset, referencing the scientific approach taken by organizations like CENAP and MUFON. The Chilean section, while detailing numerous sightings, also emphasizes the need for scientific investigation and networks to build a more robust understanding of the phenomenon, while also acknowledging the role of contactees and more mystical interpretations within the UFO community.

Title: CENAP REPORT
Issue Date: September 1986
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of the CENAP REPORT delves into various aspects of UFOlogy, featuring statistical analyses of UFO groups, tributes to key figures, event reports, and critical examinations of famous UFO cases.

Analysis of UFO Groups and Contactees

The issue begins with an analysis of the motivations behind UFO groups, noting that only 40% of the 230 surveyed groups firmly support the extraterrestrial hypothesis (ETH). A significant portion, 29.5%, provided no information about their background or explanatory hypotheses, which the authors suggest might be due to 'political reasons' or the need to maintain group cohesion by accommodating diverse viewpoints. The report details the diverse reasons 132 individual researchers became involved in UFOlogy, ranging from hollow earth theories and ancient cults to psychic powers, religious causes, and secret weapons.

In Memoriam: Karen Margrethe Linneballe

A somber section honors the passing of Karen Margrethe Linneballe, the former Secretary of SUFOI. Her death on August 3, 1986, is noted with deep regret. Linneballe was instrumental in connecting CENAP with leading Danish UFO researchers in 1975, significantly influencing their research and contributing to their international recognition. Her support facilitated the exhibition of CENAP's work at the 20th-anniversary SUFOI jubilee in Copenhagen. The article fondly recalls a UFOlogy meeting at the Linneballe's home in Rungsted-Kyst in 1980, highlighting the warm Danish hospitality experienced by CENAP representatives.

CENAP Skywatch Party

The magazine recounts CENAP's 'Skywatch Party' held on August 16, 1986, near Heilbronn. The event, organized by Roland Gehardt, took place in a secluded garden amidst forests and vineyards. Despite initial plans for stargazing using an astronomy computer program and telescopes, thick clouds and a low-lying moon hindered clear observation. The party involved a barbecue and a generally 'turbulent and nerve-wracking' experience, exacerbated by the remote location without modern amenities. The event concluded with participants chopping wood for a campfire after the 'MASSIGEN BELEUCHTUNGSKÖRPER' (large candles) burned out. The report mentions a 'field-investigator' concept and the difficulty in extinguishing a large log.

UFO Sighting in Salzburg

A detailed report describes a mysterious sighting on September 13, 1986, in Salzburg, Austria. Gardener Fritz Angerer and five Yugoslavian workers witnessed a 'sparkling, red-glowing ball' moving at jet-like speed from the east. The object hovered for about ten minutes at an altitude of approximately 7000 meters before being obscured by clouds. While initial speculation included 'burning aircraft' or 'balloons,' the local weather service and military air surveillance found no record of conventional aircraft. The report notes that similar sightings in June were attributed to planets Jupiter and Mars, but this object was too large. The article concludes that the phenomenon was likely a UFO, or possibly a police helicopter. However, a later update from Dr.A.Keul reveals that the object was identified as a 'PARTY-GAG-HEISSLUFTBALLON' launched from a nearby celebration, a fact that had been communicated to the 'Salzburger Nachrichten' but apparently without a formal 'dementi'.

The Adamski Saucer: A Lamp?

Charles F. Eckhardt, a freelance journalist, presents a theory in his article 'Is This Adamki's Saucer?' that George Adamski's famous UFO photographs were not of alien craft but of common billiard lamps. These lamps, used to illuminate billiard tables and other venues from the 1920s onwards, featured a round, dark green-metallic casing with openings that produced brilliant light. Eckhardt's uncle, who used such lamps in his business, recalled Adamski's 'flying saucer' and eventually made the connection. The article includes illustrations of the lamps and notes that finding an original lamp to definitively prove this theory has been difficult for Eckhardt. A side note mentions a photograph in Douglas Curran's book 'IN ADVANCE OF THE LANDING' showing a woman holding what appears to be an Adamski-style scout ship.

CENAP's Future Plans

The issue also touches upon CENAP's future plans, including the delayed release of the new CENAP REPORT, which is being produced with computer assistance. Issues with software and the need for additional hardware have pushed the publication to January 1987. The report will feature a new outfit and aims to improve its quality. The 'NEWS' section briefly mentions UFO sightings over Southern Germany, Luxembourg, and France, with CENAP launching an investigation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The CENAP REPORT consistently engages with UFO phenomena from a research-oriented perspective, often critically examining claims and offering alternative explanations, as seen in the Adamski case and the Salzburg sighting. The magazine also serves as a platform for reporting on UFOlogy events and acknowledging the contributions of individuals within the field, as evidenced by the tribute to Karen Linneballe. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, seeking to demystify UFO reports while acknowledging the persistent mysteries within the subject.