CENAP-REPORT

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP-REPORT
Issue: Nr.112
Date: 10./6./85 (June 10, 1985)
Publisher: CENAP (Centrales Erforschungsnetz Außergewöhnlicher Phänomene)
Country: Germany
Language: German
Price: DM 35,-- (Annual Subscription)

CENAP: The Central Research Network for Extraordinary Phenomena

The magazine introduces CENAP as a private, non-commercial research organization focused on the serious, factual, and critical study, analysis, and evaluation of the UFO phenomenon. It aims to demythologize and identify the phenomenon through physical and socio-psychological research. CENAP investigates specific reports, themes, and aspects of UFOs, documenting its findings in the CENAP REPORT publication. The organization also examines the societal impact of 'UFO belief' and its portrayal in mass media. CENAP affirms the existence of the UFO phenomenon and the necessity of its serious exploration.

CENAP REPORT (CR) Publication

The monthly publication, CENAP REPORT (CR), provides ongoing coverage of current events and research results, featuring documentations and case studies with authentic material. It also addresses public UFO debates and interdisciplinary discussions, taking a clear stance and offering commentary. The German edition of the Luxembourg publication INFO-CEPS by Gilbert Schmitz is also published within CR. Subscriptions can be made via postal transfer to account number 790 82-673 in Ludwigshafen, held by Werner Walter in Mannheim.

Background Report: J. Allen Hynek

This section provides a detailed background on J. Allen Hynek, referred to as a 'UFO-Guru'. The report summarizes an interview with Hynek from February 1985, which could not be published in the German edition of OMNI. Hynek's early life is described, including his childhood fascination with Halley's Comet and his pursuit of a doctorate in astronomy from the University of Chicago.

During the Depression, Hynek lived at the Geneva Lake Observatory in Wisconsin, dedicating himself to astronomy. He later worked for the National Science Foundation in Washington D.C., contributing to the development of a radar safety system against Kamikaze planes and V-1 rockets, and was involved with the Hiroshima bomb, an event he regrets.

In 1948, while director of the McMillin School Observatory in Ohio, Hynek was approached by Air Force officers from Wright Field regarding 'flying saucers'. Initially skeptical, he dismissed them as 'nonsense' or 'post-war unrest'. He agreed to join 'Project Sign' as a consultant to help process the large volume of incoming reports, viewing it as an opportunity for 'fresh lobster'.

Hynek reviewed UFO reports, often identifying them as meteors or balloons. He was a skeptic, believing most reports were nonsense. The Air Force found the idea of flying saucers distasteful and initially ignored reports, but eventually had to respond for public relations reasons, especially to reports from military pilots.

General Nathan Twining recommended taking the matter seriously, but General Hoyt S. Vandenberg rejected this. Vandenberg's own report in June 1949 concluded that 80% of sightings had astronomical or other explanations, with 20% remaining unexplained. Hynek believed even these could likely be explained with further investigation.

In July 1952, sightings over Washington Airport, including maneuvers above the White House, captured public attention and led to the initiation of Project Blue Book. Hynek was brought back, finding this new project to be more than just public relations, with Pentagon backing.

Hynek stated that the Luftwaffe was responsible for everything in the sky and that admitting UFOs were real would be bad PR. He observed that Project Blue Book often presented explanations that were contradictory or demonstrably false, such as attributing sightings to Venus when it was below the horizon. Hynek felt he never had a truly scientific discussion about UFOs during his time with Blue Book.

Project Blue Book was led exclusively by Air Force personnel. Its first director, Captain Ed Ruppelt, focused on reporting UFOs upwards. Ruppelt's successor, Captain Charles Hardin, was less engaged, and later directors like Captain George T. Gregory provided answers that satisfied their superiors.

Hynek began building his own 'Air Force Blue Book archive' at home, suspecting there was more to the phenomenon than was publicly acknowledged, based on the caliber of witnesses (MIT professors, engineers, military personnel, commercial pilots, air traffic controllers).

He recalled cases like the Levelland, Texas, incident (1957) and the Socorro, New Mexico, incident (1964), where the Luftwaffe suspected secret government machines or extraterrestrial craft. Hynek noted that UFO debunker Philip J. Klass suggested the Socorro story was fabricated to attract tourists.

Hynek investigated the Frank Manor sighting in Dexter, Michigan, where a machine reportedly landed and a projectile bounced off it. He found the area to be a marshland, potentially explaining it as swamp gas. At a press conference, Hynek suggested the Hillsdale incident pointed to swamp gas, though he admitted he couldn't prove it. This led to widespread media reporting of 'swamp gas' as the explanation.

The swamp gas incident generated significant attention, leading Congressman Gerald Ford to call for a hearing and the establishment of a UFO commission at various universities, which became the controversial Condon Committee. The Air Force was eager to conclude Project Blue Book.

Hynek met with Professor Edward V. Condon, who was initially negative about the topic. Condon, a scientist known for his radar research, was tasked with investigating the UFO situation. Hynek observed that Bob Low, who was in charge of the committee's work, was writing the report's chapters and conclusions. The Condon Committee received all Project Blue Book files, but most were never examined. Condon selected 75 cases, of which 25 remained unexplained. However, the widely distributed summaries omitted this fact, leading Hynek to believe that Dr. Condon had not read his own report.

In 1973, Hynek investigated a sighting in Boanai, New Guinea, described as a glowing disk with a blue beam. Project Blue Book had classified it as 'cloud illumination'. Hynek was interrupted by a telegram about a UFO sighting in Athens, Georgia, during a wave of over 500 sightings across the eastern USA. This led him to found CUFOS (Center for UFO Studies).

Hynek redefined the UFO phenomenon as a continuous flood of reports from around the world, emphasizing that the phenomenon itself says nothing about its origin or 'little green men'. He developed categories for UFO sightings (NL, DD, RV, CE I-III), which Steven Spielberg later used for his film 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind'.

Hynek questioned whether UFOs provided new empirical evidence like bacteria did for Van Leeuwenhoek. He considered the possibility that UFO phenomena are not physical but psychological, requiring psychologists to explain why geographically independent witnesses report identical details. He also suggested that UFOs might teach us more about ourselves than about the universe.

He noted that abduction accounts receive the most attention, as seen in Spielberg's film. Hynek explores the idea that advanced civilizations might project holographic illusions. He also mentions the Cash/Landrum incident and the possibility that the witnesses saw a holographic appearance of helicopters.

Hynek expressed skepticism about claims by Larry Bryant regarding the US government holding crashed saucers and alien bodies, calling Bryant a 'super-enthusiast' with poor judgment. Hynek stated he did not want to discuss crashed saucers as he needed to maintain public credibility.

Hynek believes the UFO phenomenon is not just about pilot reports but also involves cults claiming communication with extraterrestrials. He finds these claims unverifiable, as cultists often state that aliens do not wish to discuss the matter. Hynek suggests that 'schwindlers and psychopaths' may manipulate the situation to sow doubt about real sightings, viewing the UFO phenomenon as a conditioning process for the human race.

He cites George Adamski as an example of a major fraud whose followers remain numerous. Hynek found Adamski's arguments illogical and his understanding of astronomy and physics flawed, yet Adamski was received by Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands. Hynek suggests that Adamski's message of 'love and kindness' resonated with people seeking help from above, especially during times of energy crisis and nuclear threat.

Hynek's current focus is on CE II cases (physical traces) rather than abductions, as he believes that if UFOs are not real craft, they cannot leave traces. He speculates that a highly advanced civilization could project holographic illusions. He acknowledges this is speculation but suggests that engaging with the UFO phenomenon expands our imagination and awareness of our world.

He also mentions the possibility of extraterrestrial visitors, noting that our detection instruments are sensitive enough to detect a football but not UFOs. He questions why, if UFOs are spacecraft, they are not detected when entering and exiting Earth's atmosphere.

Regarding abductions, Hynek finds the explanations of reliving birth trauma unconvincing, particularly for adults remembering their birth process. He believes that the UFO phenomenon, whether psychological or physical, raises more questions than answers about the nature of reality.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently promotes a serious, scientific, and critical approach to the UFO phenomenon. It emphasizes the importance of factual data, research, and analysis, while also acknowledging the psychological and societal dimensions of belief in UFOs. The editorial stance is one of open inquiry, seeking to demythologize and understand the phenomenon rather than dismissing it outright. There is a clear distinction made between verifiable evidence and speculation, and a critique of sensationalism and unsubstantiated claims. The publication aims to inform the public and foster a more rational understanding of UFO reports and related events.

This issue of UFO-Nachrichten, dated October 1984, focuses on a significant UFO sighting event that occurred on July 23, 1984, over Leeds, England. The magazine is published by UFO-Nachrichten in Germany and is written in German. The issue includes detailed witness accounts, investigative efforts by the Yorkshire UFO Society (YUFOS), and discussions about potential military involvement.

J. Allen Hynek's New Project

The issue begins with an interview or discussion concerning J. Allen Hynek, who is described as a UFO guru. Hynek expresses his reluctance to be labeled as such but acknowledges his deep involvement in studying the phenomenon. He recounts a new case that sparked his interest: a sighting in Westchester County, New York, involving dozens of credible witnesses, including experts in computing, teaching, engineering, and a meteorologist, who observed a large, hovering boomerang-shaped object with numerous lights. Hynek notes the significance of multiple independent witnesses in this case. He also reveals his new project in Phoenix, called 'UFO Research Facility' or 'Hynek's Hazienda,' funded by a private philanthropist. This facility aims to be a comprehensive UFO research center, addressing the perceived lack of professionalism and inadequate equipment in much of current UFO research. Hynek plans to build a professional operation with advanced technology and a network of specialists, including psychologists, physicists, polygraph experts, and magicians, to conduct thorough investigations and produce scientific documents acceptable to the national academy of sciences. He also shares his personal philosophical views, likening himself to a spider in a corner of a 747 and stating that the universe is not a coincidence and is far beyond human comprehension.

The Leeds Incident: Lights in the Sky!

The main feature of this issue details the events of July 23, 1984, in Leeds, England, as reported by Werner Walter and investigated by YUFOS and CENAP. The event is described as a "perfect cover-up" for a particular reason. In the months leading up to July 1984, residents in the Leeds area reported seeing slow-moving, silent lights, mostly yellow, often near Leeds/Bradford Airport. YUFOS raised two key questions: the silent nature of the lights combined with their arrangement, and the fact that they were seen after the airport's closing time.

On the night of July 23, 1984, at approximately 10:02 PM, Philip Mantle reported seeing two extremely bright, white lights over the Middleton area of South Leeds. He observed them for about ten minutes, noting they were not like aircraft lights and were described as two round spheres close together. The lights remained stationary before Mantle attempted to photograph them.

Leeds & Bradford Airport was notified at 10:05 PM but denied knowledge of any aircraft in the vicinity. By 11:00 PM, the Yorkshire Post received numerous reports of unidentified flying objects. YUFOS investigators were alerted and positioned themselves to track and photograph the lights.

At 3:15 AM, three unknown lights were seen directly over the center of Leeds. Simultaneously, a military-type aircraft passed by. Investigator Mr. Walker reported stationary lights near Goole around 9:35 PM, which later moved towards Leeds. Other witnesses, including Mrs. Davey, also observed lights moving towards Leeds. A Mr. R. Portman and his son Robert reported seeing two bright white lights moving low from east to west near Goole, which then ascended and disappeared.

Further sightings occurred around Wakefield, with Mr. Ailsbury reporting lights "going out" at 9:45 PM. Mr. Webster in Middleton observed two round white lights close together, with the right one flickering before both vanished. Mr. D. Patterson provided a detailed description of two lights appearing at low altitude with pulsating colored lights on their underside.

At Belle Isle, Mr. Kistoe saw a bright white light, larger than Jupiter, with a second light nearby. Mr. Wilson in Tingley also observed lights. The Clayton couple in Bradford saw lights on the horizon. At 10:10 PM, Mr. Rainer and his parents saw white lights with colored lights underneath, which disappeared after five minutes.

Trevor Peel in Halifax saw a light moving east to west that suddenly exploded. A young couple returning from York to Leeds saw a low-flying, tilted plate-like object that illuminated their windshield.

Investigation and Official Responses

YUFOS contacted the RAF base at Leconfield, a large helicopter base. Flt/Lt. Raw stated that military flights use civilian airfields when necessary and use them as markers for flights. He was evasive when asked about military operations near Leeds on July 23, 1984, citing it as a military matter. He suggested that the lights might have been caused by arrangements used since the Falklands War and mentioned that Leeds & Bradford Airport becomes a military airfield at night, with helicopters using powerful flares to guide them.

Further investigation by YUFOS revealed that special equipment might be on board certain helicopters, leaving traces on the ground and on people. They also learned about a special department, S.O.3 AVIATION, at the TASKING unit in Topcliffe, which handles flight details in England. This department mentioned that a special light was tested for the police in Bedford, which might explain the sightings.

However, the Bedford police do not have their own helicopter. The article notes that in September, they were involved in a hunt for a man known as "The Fox," using helicopters from the Thames Valley and Metropolitan Police, and an army helicopter with "special equipment."

The article then shifts to an incident on October 4, 1984, where eight people were arrested for smuggling cannabis aboard the ship 'The Sir Robert Gordon' in Essex. During the operation, a brilliant white light from the sky illuminated the entire area without sound, believed to be from a helicopter with special equipment that made night into day.

Reactions and Commentary

Airport Director Dennison of Leeds/Bradford Airport stated that no aircraft were detected by radar during the reported sightings. YUFOS expressed skepticism about the radar data, suggesting that radar operators might have been negligent. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) stated that their interest in UFOs is limited to defense implications and that they were satisfied the Leeds lights posed no such threat. They referenced the Woodbridge incident, where rational explanations were found.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue strongly emphasizes the unexplained nature of the Leeds sightings, highlighting the number of credible witnesses and the inadequacy of official explanations. The investigation by YUFOS is presented as a dedicated effort to uncover the truth. There's a recurring theme of potential military involvement and secrecy, with officials being evasive or denying knowledge. The article also touches upon the philosophical aspects of UFO research through the lens of J. Allen Hynek's views. The overall stance appears to be one of critical inquiry into unexplained aerial phenomena, challenging official narratives and advocating for rigorous scientific investigation.

This issue of INFO-CEPS IM C.R.! spans pages 21-30 and features a mix of UFO reports, psychological analysis of UFO research, and a detailed examination of the controversial UFO contactee George Adamski. The publication is presented by the BUREAU DE LIAISON DE LA CENAP POUR LES PAYS FRANCOPHONE D'EUROPE, with Gilbert Schmitz as the publisher. The content is primarily in German, with a focus on critical investigation and psychological perspectives.

Article 1: UFO-Produzent LYNX 3 auf Missionsflug

This section details an incident from July 23, 1984, near Chesterfield, where brilliant lights were observed during miners' strikes. Military helicopters, possibly a LYNX 3, were reportedly used to search for striking workers who had fled into the bushes and woods. The author, Graham W. Birdsall of YUFOS, speculates that the helicopter's actions—flying, hovering, disappearing, and reappearing—suggest a purpose beyond a simple search. He posits that the helicopter might have been monitoring power plants, power lines, and mines in the politically sensitive area, which was described as a 'political time bomb.' The secrecy surrounding the operation is attributed to its potentially legally questionable nature. The author leans towards the explanation of a military helicopter with special equipment rather than a genuine UFO.

Article 2: Gedanken zur Psychologie in der UFO-Forschung (Thoughts on Psychology in UFO Research)

This article, authored by a CENAP staff member, delves into the increasing focus on psychological explanations for UFO sightings. The author expresses a personal stance of not believing in UFOs, clarifying that this is not to dismiss observations but to emphasize a critical, evidence-based approach. Drawing a parallel with criminalistics, the author argues that witness testimonies, while a starting point, should not be blindly accepted. The piece highlights that everyone, regardless of background, is subject to the laws of perceptual psychology. The author explains that psychology, as a science of the soul, investigates inner forces, emotions, and human relationships. It aims to overcome preconceived notions and maintain critical distance, a challenging task given the subjective nature of feelings and human behavior. The article critiques the reliance on 'common sense' for understanding complex psychological phenomena and emphasizes the need for rigorous scientific research, noting that psychology as a formal science is relatively young, less than a hundred years old.

Article 3: CENAP NAHM KONTAKT AUF! DER MANN VOM MOND (CENAP Made Contact! The Man from the Moon)

This section focuses on the CENAP group's efforts to engage with UFO phenomena and features an interview with former US astronaut Colonel James B. Irwin. The article begins by addressing the common UFOlogist claim that terrestrial astronauts have encountered UFOs, specifically mentioning alleged sightings by Gordon Cooper and Scott Carpenter. Colonel Irwin, however, dismisses these claims, stating that while space contains many inexplicable phenomena like dust and debris, no astronaut has ever reported seeing an extraterrestrial spacecraft. He believes that approximately 95% of reported UFO sightings can be explained, with the remainder being 'fantasy products.' The interview took place on March 29, 1985, in Schwaigern, where Irwin gave a lecture about his Apollo-15 mission. CENAP representatives Oskar Böß and Roland Gehardt had the opportunity to ask Irwin questions.

Article 4: BUCHBESPRECHUNG: ADAMSKI: DIE ERGÄNZUNG (Book Review: Adamski: The Supplement)

This book review, written by a CENAP-Mannheim member, discusses George Adamski, a pivotal figure in the UFO subculture known for his claims of contact with 'Good Brothers from All.' The review focuses on the book 'THE UNTOLD STORY' by Lou Zinsstag and Timothy Good. It criticizes Adamski's followers, particularly the DUIST group, for viewing a new novel as a continuation of Adamski's work, labeling it as 'deluded belief' and 'idolatry.' The review details the book's structure, with Part 1 by Lou Zinsstag and Part 2 by Timothy Good. It mentions Adamski's background, born in 1891, and his early public lectures on 'Universal Law' and astronomy. The review touches upon Adamski's alleged contact with Venusians and the 'Orthon' drawing, noting that Adamski claimed the true identity of Orthon had to remain hidden for safety reasons. It also mentions the 'Desert Encounter' chapter and a claim by Sgt. Jerrold Baker regarding Scoutship photos, which Lou Zinsstag speculates might have been made under CIA pressure. The review highlights Adamski's early engagement with public relations and his ability to captivate audiences with his lectures.

Lou Zinsstag's personal interest in UFOs began in 1954 after reading Donald Keyhoe's book. She became Adamski's Swiss representative and was involved in his 'Get Acquainted Program,' aimed at informing the public and expanding ufological circles. The review notes correspondents from various countries, including England, where Jessie Roestenberg reported an Adamski-like encounter. The review also mentions Waveney Girvan and John Lade, Adamski's representative for England, emphasizing the sense of community and friendship Adamski fostered.

Adamski's background is further explored, noting his birth in 1891 and his early engagement with 'Universal Law' around 1931. He gave public lectures on astronomy and philosophy, a peculiar combination. The review mentions his 'wander teacher' persona during winter months and his work at a small cafe, attracting large audiences. His early radio broadcasts, predating his UFO claims, are noted, as is his acquisition of a telescope in the late 1940s, which he used to photograph 'flying saucers.' The review also clarifies that the famous 'Orthon' drawing is not an exact representation of the Venusian, and Adamski expressed concerns about revealing Orthon's true identity due to potential danger.

Chapter 2, 'The Desert Encounter,' is mentioned, referencing Sgt. Jerrold Baker's alleged involvement in Scoutship photos with Adamski. James Moseley reportedly received a statement from Baker contradicting this, which Lou Zinsstag attributes to CIA pressure. The review also notes correspondence with Mr. Ragaz, who believed the solution to symbolic messages lay in sand imprints, a notion Adamski apparently dismissed.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO phenomena, the role of psychology in understanding witness accounts, and a skeptical yet engaged approach to UFOlogy. The editorial stance appears to favor scientific rigor and evidence-based reasoning, urging readers to avoid blind belief and to critically analyze information. The magazine highlights the importance of distinguishing between factual observation and subjective interpretation, particularly in the context of witness testimonies and the claims of UFO contactees like George Adamski. There is a clear emphasis on debunking sensationalism and providing a more grounded perspective on UFO research.

Title: SAUCER SMEAR
Issue: Volume 32, No. 2
Date: February 5th, 1985
Publisher: SAUCER AND UNEXPLAINED CELESTIAL EVENTS RESEARCH SOCIETY
Editor: James W. Moseley

This issue of SAUCER SMEAR, a non-scheduled newsletter, delves into the controversial figure of George Adamski and the broader landscape of UFOlogy, often with a critical and skeptical lens. The publication, dedicated to the "highest principles of ufological journalism," aims to expose perceived falsehoods and manipulations within the field.

The Adamski Controversy

The magazine extensively discusses George Adamski, a prominent contactee who claimed to have received messages from Venusian and Martian beings and to have flown in their spacecraft. The articles question the authenticity of his claims, suggesting that his influence on UFO enthusiasts was far greater than any verifiable evidence he provided. The text highlights how Adamski became synonymous with the concept of UFO contact, with his 'scout ships' being described as actual flying saucers rather than mere projections.

Several chapters from Lou Zinsstag's work are referenced, detailing Adamski's early visits to Europe, including a lecture to the Royal Family of Holland. Zinsstag's account also touches upon Adamski's interactions with a circle of friends and the alleged attempt to discredit his work by offering $25,000 for him to admit his book was fiction. The narrative suggests that the UFO story phenomenon of the 1950s was a 'family business' for spreading rumors.

Further details emerge about Adamski's alleged encounters, including a meeting with 'Boys' in Basel, whom he identified as Venusian friends. The magazine notes Adamski's loyalty to the US government and his lectures to military personnel, who were interested in photos from space as early as 1949.

The issue also brings up Adamski's connections with prominent figures like Oberth and Dr. Fritz Zwicky, suggesting that the 'world elite' were frequent visitors. The 'Zürich incident' involving students who allegedly turned against Adamski is mentioned, as is the prevalence of trance mediums in the 1950s who began attributing their messages to 'Space Ship occupants' after Adamski's success.

Concerns are raised about the potential for deception, with Adamski himself warning against trance messages, fearing that poltergeists or even the devil could be behind them. His alleged meeting with Pope John XXIII is mentioned, with a coin presented as evidence. The text also notes a mysterious break in Adamski's relationship with Lucy McGinnis in 1961, the reasons for which remain unknown. It is also stated that President Kennedy secretly met with Adamski and inspected a flying saucer.

The 'Saturn Report' is discussed, which caused confusion and was later linked to the 'Philadelphia Experiment'. By 1962, doubts about Adamski's Saturn trip grew, with some suggesting it was a 'mental experience' induced by self-hypnosis. The magazine implies Adamski may have fallen into the wrong hands, with new individuals appearing among his associates, leading to suspicions of a sophisticated deception organization.

Adamski is also accused of making mistakes, such as sending letters from a post office box in California, presenting them as if they came from extraterrestrials. This led to increased opposition and a fracturing of his support base in the early 1960s, with individuals claiming their own contacts were being misrepresented.

The 'R.E. Straith' Letter and Hoaxes

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to debunking the 'R.E. Straith' letter, an alleged official US government communication confirming knowledge of UFOs. The magazine reveals that this letter, purportedly from a non-existent cultural exchange committee, was actually a hoax orchestrated by Gray Barker and James W. Moseley in 1957. They used US government letterhead to create fabricated letters, including one signed by 'R.E. Straith,' to sow confusion in the UFO field. The FBI investigation that followed was not to confirm Adamski's claims but to determine who was using government stationery.

James W. Moseley, the editor, admits to his role in creating these letters, driven by a desire to create confusion. The magazine highlights how this hoax, along with others, has undermined the credibility of many UFO stories.

Critiques of UFOlogy and Skepticism

SAUCER SMEAR adopts a highly critical stance towards many UFO researchers and their methodologies. The publication questions the motivations of those who seek to prove the existence of flying saucers, suggesting they are often driven by preconceived notions rather than objective investigation. The magazine criticizes the tendency to accept claims without rigorous background checks, citing the example of Phil Klass and his research.

It also touches upon the phenomenon of 'trance mediums' and their messages, warning that such communications could be influenced by deceptive entities. The magazine expresses skepticism about the reliability of human perception, noting that even trained professionals can experience misidentifications.

The 'Adamski-Schmiere' and its Legacy

The article "ADAMSKI-SCHMIERE: GEHEIMNIS-LÜFTUNG!" by Werner Walter and Hansjürgen Köhler, asserts that Adamski's impact on UFO thinking was profound, shaping the perception of UFOs as 'flying saucers' from intelligent extraterrestrial life. However, it argues that the 'Adamski-Schmiere' (Adamski's smear/hoax) is now unraveling, with even his staunchest supporters beginning to question his claims.

The authors contend that even those who dismiss Adamski as unscientific should consider his influence, as many UFO researchers are driven by a desire to confirm their existing beliefs rather than seeking objective truth. The piece suggests that the core motivation is often to prove the existence of flying saucers, regardless of their origin.

Specific Cases and Criticisms

The issue references various UFO cases and individuals. The 'Clarksburg and Benedum Airport incidents' are mentioned, along with films distributed by SAUCERIAN PRESS featuring Adamski's scout ships. Moseley comments that the object in these films was much smaller than perceived, possibly less than six inches in diameter, making it difficult for humanoid Venusians to enter.

The magazine also discusses the role of Gray Barker in creating the 'Men In Black' phenomenon, suggesting that if this is proven true, many UFO stories would be invalidated.

SAUCER SMEAR reports on a Miami radio show where Moseley discussed UFOs and ancient astronauts, but his true intention was to promote his antique business. The publication notes a postal rate increase as a form of protest by Moseley.

Stanton Friedman is quoted, suggesting that UFOs are real and extraterrestrial, but criticizing certain researchers for not working with the available data. Betty Hill is mentioned, questioning whether 'the aliens' conduct character checks on those they abduct.

James Randi is quoted expressing skepticism. The magazine also satirizes the idea of a connection between UFOs and Reagan's STAR WARS program, suggesting a conspiracy theory involving the USA and USSR collaborating to defend against hostile UFOs, possibly stemming from the Rendlesham Forest incident.

Poetic Critiques and Personal Reflections

The issue includes a poem attributed to Gray Barker, titled "UFO IS A BUCKET OF SHIT," which uses crude language to describe UFOs and their believers. The poem lists various types of believers, from 'perverts' to 'new age' adherents, and suggests they are either silenced or masturbated by 'spacemen.' The poem concludes by stating that the Air Force investigated UFOs and concluded they were a "bucket of shit." Several individuals, including James W. Moseley, are described as having a similar view.

Moseley reflects on the death of Gray Barker, suggesting it may have led him to reveal the truth about the UFO field being a "gigantic joke." He notes that many build their UFO ideology on these deceptions.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of SAUCER SMEAR are skepticism towards contactee claims, particularly those of George Adamski, and a critical examination of the UFOlogy field. The editorial stance is one of debunking and exposing alleged hoaxes and manipulations. The magazine emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and objective investigation, contrasting it with what it perceives as gullibility and wishful thinking within the UFO community. There is a strong undercurrent of cynicism and a belief that much of the UFO phenomenon has been fabricated or misinterpreted for various reasons, including personal gain and the desire to create sensational narratives.