CENAP-REPORT

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP-REPORT
Issue: Nr.99
Date: January 21, 1984

This issue of the CENAP-REPORT, a publication from the German "centrales erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher phänomene" (Central Research Network for Extraordinary Phenomena), delves into UFO sightings and investigations. It features a report on a potential UFO photograph taken in Malaga, Spain, and a detailed analysis of a significant wave of sightings in the United States during March 1983, often referred to as the 'Boomerang' phenomenon. The magazine also includes a case from Austria that was identified as a conventional aircraft.

UFO über Malaga fotografiert?

The lead story on the cover reports on a sighting in Malaga, Spain, where over 30 people claimed to have seen a flying saucer on a Thursday. Eyewitnesses stated with certainty that it was not an airplane or any other familiar object. The object reportedly appeared suddenly over San Carlos, a suburb of Malaga, and was visible for only two to three seconds. An 18-year-old named David Romero claims to have photographed the UFO, and his photo was to be evaluated by Spanish experts. The article is attributed to 'Neue Presse, 21.01.84'.

Neue UFO-Beweise für Besuche der UMMO-Wesen? Zusammenhang mit CE-3-Fall in Neu-Isenburg?

This section, presented as a headline on the cover, suggests a connection between new UFO evidence and the UMMO beings, as well as a CE-3 case in Neu-Isenburg. However, the content of this specific article is not detailed within the provided pages.

DER BESTE UFO-FALL IN DEN USA?

This extensive article, authored by Werner Walter and drawing heavily from Philip Imbrogno's work in the INTERNATIONAL UFO REPORTER (July/August 1983 issue), focuses on the remarkable UFO sightings that occurred over three nights in March 1983 in the areas of Westchester, Putnam, and Fairfield in New York, and Connecticut. Initially, the authors, like many, suspected conventional explanations such as Venus, a blimp, or a bright meteor. However, the sheer volume and consistency of witness reports, involving hundreds of independent observers, led to the conclusion that this case defied easy explanation.

The sightings described a large object, estimated to be 100-200 feet wide, often boomerang-shaped or triangular, with a prominent arrangement of red, white, green, and blue lights, and a central amber light. Witnesses reported a low, humming or buzzing sound. The object was observed moving slowly, sometimes hovering for short periods, at altitudes estimated between 60 and 500 feet. Some witnesses reported getting as close as 100-200 feet.

The article meticulously details specific sightings from March 24th, including reports from Yorktown (about 100 residents), Mount Kisco (ten witnesses), and Mahopec (hundreds of reports). It describes the object's movement, its lights, and the sounds it emitted. The article also includes sightings from March 17th and March 26th, further elaborating on the object's characteristics and behavior.

TABLE I: Object Characteristics

A comprehensive table summarizes the characteristics reported by witnesses across the three nights:

• Shape: 90% Boomerang, 9% Triangle, 1% Other.
• Lights: 85% Blue-green, red, white or amber; 5% Red, blue; 5% White; 5% Not sure.
• Relative Motion of Lights: 97% Shifting relative position; 3% No.
• Size: 60% Over 100 feet; 35% Over 300 feet; 5% Over 900 feet.
• Sound: 65% Buzzing or humming; 30% No sound; 5% Don't remember.
• Duration of Sighting: 95% 10-20 minutes; 5% Less than 10 minutes.
• Motion: 60% Smooth and straight; 40% Right angle turns, sudden stops.
• Hovering: 80% Yes; 20% No.
• Speed: 90% Very slow; 5% Very fast; 5% Slow, then fast.
• Distance from Observers: 80% Within 500 feet; 15% Over 500 feet; 5% Not sure.
• Manner of Disappearance: 75% Went below horizon; 20% Blinked out and was gone; 5% Just disappeared.
• Personal Reactions: 85% None; 10% Some psychic connection; 5% Not sure. (3% reported animal reactions).

CUFOS Commentary:

The article includes a commentary from CUFOS (Center for UFO Studies), which, while acknowledging the statistical unlikelihood of so many independent witnesses being mistaken, leans towards a natural explanation. They highlight that UFOs typically do not appear to hundreds of witnesses over extended periods or repeat in such a manner. The consistent reports, however, suggest a genuine phenomenon, even if not extraterrestrial.

The commentary questions the possibility of a new, super-secret military machine, finding it unlikely to be tested so openly near New York City. It also dismisses helicopters as an explanation due to the rigid formation and sustained hovering. The possibility of a Goodyear blimp is also considered but deemed unlikely due to the object's shape and speed.

The article concludes by posing the question to readers if they know what this 'Boomerang machine' was, inviting solutions. It references further updates from Philip Imbrogno, George Lesnick, and Chris Clark, indicating ongoing investigations by reporter Ed Walzer.

Later in the article, the investigation into the March 1983 sightings revealed that some reports were indeed identified as aircraft, specifically three small planes in formation flight observed near Stormville Airport. However, the authors maintain that this does not explain the majority of the March reports. They note that similar objects were reported as far back as 1980 but became more prominent in 1983. The article suggests that misinterpretation of distances and altitudes in the dark is common, leading witnesses to overestimate the size and proximity of objects.

Advertising Planes as IFOs:

A significant portion of the later pages is dedicated to explaining how advertising planes, equipped with flashing lights and sometimes nets, can be mistaken for UFOs. Citing Allen Hendry's UFO HANDBOOK, it states that 22% of reported 'Nocturnal Lights' (NL-IFOs) and even 61% of 'Class I' phenomena (objects seen within 500 meters) were identified as advertising aircraft. The page includes sketches from Hendry's handbook illustrating how UFO observers might interpret these advertising planes as alien craft.

Abermals UFO über Österreich identifiziert – kein UFO – vielmehr ein Flugzeug

This section, attributed to CENAP-Austria and Christian Pöchhacker, details an investigation into a UFO sighting reported in Austria. The case involved Heinrich Z. from Graz, who on January 3, 1984, observed a strong white light moving south near the Graz-Thalerhof airport. After inquiries with the airport's air traffic control, it was determined that the object was a four-engine turboprop aircraft, a TYROLEAN AIRWAYS DASH 7, flying from Innsbruck. The strong white light was explained by the aircraft's landing lights, and its movement and rainbow-colored livery (as TYROLEAN AIRWAYS paints its planes) matched the witness's description. The weather conditions were clear with good visibility.

MADRID / II. Internationaler Kongress für Ufologie

This short section reports on the II. International Congress for Ufology in Madrid. It mentions that Spanish pilots, including Captain Jose Antonio Silva, presented evidence for the existence of UFOs. Silva spoke of an astronaut on the moon during one of the landings reporting the arrival of beings or objects seen on the lunar surface the previous day. Another pilot, Juan Ignacio Lorenzo, recounted seeing three UFOs in 1968 during a flight from London to Alicante.

Ein UFO-Geschwader

This brief report mentions alleged sightings of a UFO squadron over Buenos Aires, Argentina, with eyewitnesses counting up to nine 'flying saucers'. A reporter who rushed to the scene described the objects moving at high speed and emitting bright, changing lights. However, airport radar did not detect any unusual activity.

Ufo-Glaube

This short piece from Bad Tölz discusses the persistence of UFO beliefs, contrasting them with more rational explanations. It suggests that many reported sightings are actually fireworks, meteorites, or burning rocket stages, and that the desire for alien visitors is strong.

Ufo-Telefon

This news brief from Paris reports on the establishment of a special "SOS-UFO" telephone line by a private French organization for reporting unexplained aerial phenomena. The service aims to collect reports and, if necessary, trigger checks by French air traffic control.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

Throughout the issue, CENAP consistently advocates for a serious, objective, and unbiased approach to UFO research. The magazine actively debunks sensationalist claims and emphasizes the importance of identifying conventional explanations for sightings. While acknowledging that a few cases remain unexplained, CENAP refrains from jumping to extraterrestrial conclusions, preferring rigorous investigation and evidence-based analysis. The editorial stance is clearly against the uncritical acceptance of alien visitation theories and promotes a scientific methodology for studying UFO phenomena.

This issue of PROBE REPORT, titled 'JOURNAL OF UFO INVESTIGATION', published in October 1983 (Vol 4: No 2), delves into various aspects of UFO research, with a particular focus on radar investigations and the re-evaluation of past cases. The cover prominently features the headline "Martians are back" and an illustration of a flying saucer, alongside a quote: "It was a sight more fantastic than anything in a movie". The magazine is published by CENAP and originates from Germany.

Radar Investigations and Air Traffic Control

The issue begins with a letter from the Bundesanstalt für Flugsicherung (BFS), specifically from Hans U.Ohl of the International Affairs department, thanking CENAP for a radar image and accompanying text. The radar display, used by air traffic controllers, provides crucial information such as airspace boundaries, runway locations, and navigation beacons. It can integrate data from up to six different radar systems. The text explains the various symbols used on radar screens: squares represent aircraft identified by secondary radar, often with an 'etikett' showing call sign, altitude, and speed. Triangles indicate aircraft that transmit secondary radar pulses but are assigned to other radar units. A large cross 'X' marks 'unknown flying objects' (UFOs), typically primary targets operating under visual flight rules and not in contact with any radar station. A small cross 'x' denotes previous locations, providing information on flight direction.

The BFS acknowledges receiving numerous UFO sighting reports and states that they have always attempted to identify the origin of these phenomena, indicating they do not dismiss them. However, investigations often occur after the event, making definitive conclusions difficult. The BFS notes that many observations can be explained by technical or meteorological conditions, such as weather-related over-reach, proximity to radar antennas, tangential flight paths, or 'blind speed' phenomena.

Re-evaluation of Past Cases

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to re-examining previously reported UFO cases. The 'GEGENREDE!' section revisits the Bielefeld/Leopoldshöhe case from May 1979, initially reported as a 'red fireball' or potential meteorite/UFO. After a new assessment, the conclusion is that the object was likely a party-gag hot air balloon. This re-evaluation is presented by Dr.Walter Junge, who had previously investigated the case. He acknowledges that most facts align with the hot air balloon hypothesis, with the only point of contention being the estimated size of the fireball (162 m +/- 40%).

Another article, "Doch ein Ufo?" (Is it a UFO?), also discusses the Bielefeld/Leopoldshöhe incident, with Dr. Junge suggesting it could be a UFO due to antigravitational forces causing stones and sand to be thrown up, and ionization creating light phenomena. However, the article also presents alternative explanations, including a malfunctioning turbine at the Feldmühle paper factory, which produced a hissing and humming sound, and the possibility of unusual moonlight causing the red color. The article notes that many callers reported strange noises and sights around the same time.

The issue also references earlier CENAP reports concerning UFO flaps and sightings in Switzerland, Germany (Edingen, Heidelberg, Saarbrücken), and the Wirth family's sighting.

UFOs Over Spain

An article titled "UFOS ÜBER SPANIEN?" (UFOs Over Spain?) reports on a sighting and photograph of a UFO over Malaga, Spain, on January 21, 1984. Over 30 people reportedly saw the object, described as a small black point, and it was also detected on airport radar. The photograph was taken by an 18-year-old with a standard 16mm Kodak camera. The case was investigated by the Spanish research group ADEFEX, with contact made by Francisco Aguilera. The article notes that this incident was later linked to the CE III-fall of Andreas Schneider from Neu-Isenburg, which was presented with a new version of the UMMO story.

PROBE REPORT's Demise and the UK UFO Scene

Werner Walter, CENAP-Staff, writes about the "FINAL ISSUE" of the PROBE REPORT in October 1983. He laments the end of the journal, which had been published for four years by Ian Mrzyglod and Terry Chivers, stating it was a significant loss for the British UFO scene. Despite a comparatively high production quality, the circulation never exceeded 100 copies. The article mentions other UK UFO publications like FSR, NORTHERN UFO NEWS-Magazin, MAGONIA, BUFORA BULLEIN, and OSEAP JOURNAL, noting the competitive and challenging nature of the market.

UFO Nests and Whirlwinds

Another section discusses the phenomenon of "UFO-Nester" (UFO nests) in England, particularly near Warminster. It is argued that these are not UFO evidence but rather the result of whirlwinds. The article criticizes the sensationalism surrounding these events, noting how the press and TV, especially the DAILY EXPRESS, amplified the 'circle saga'. It mentions that Dr. Hynek also visited England to examine the scene. Despite the likely natural explanations, the memory of these 'unheimlichen Begegnungen' (uncanny encounters) near Warminster is fondly recalled by some.

UFOs in Wider and Narrower Senses

CENAP clarifies its research approach, stating that it investigates all reported phenomena, whether they are identified flying objects (IFOs) or truly unknown atmospheric phenomena (UAPs). They aim to identify misinterpretations and natural explanations. CENAP expresses a desire to focus more on UAPs but notes that many reported UFOs are actually IFOs due to the observer's lack of better knowledge. The publication also touches upon the idea of UFO-related government secrecy, deeming it highly questionable.

UFOs on Video

Klaus Webner, a film and photo consultant, announces plans to release a UFO video cassette titled "UFO'S IN ALLER MUNDE" (UFOs All Over the World) if there is sufficient public interest. The 20-minute cassette would feature a German UFO film from 1973, footage of George Adamski, DUIST Congresses from 1967 (Mainz) and 1975 (Wiesbaden), an American UFO film from December 1, 1957, and American Air Force files. It would include appearances by figures like Adamski, Stranges, Prof. Oberth, and Vonkeviczky.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the investigation and explanation of UFO sightings, with a strong emphasis on identifying natural or conventional explanations for phenomena initially perceived as extraterrestrial. CENAP's editorial stance is one of rigorous scientific inquiry, seeking to demystify UFO reports by applying logical reasoning and technical analysis. While acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena, the magazine prioritizes evidence-based conclusions and expresses skepticism towards sensationalism and unsubstantiated claims. There is also a critique of disinformation within the UFO community and a call for a more scientific approach to the subject.

Title: SUR
Issue Date: Sábado, 4 de febrero de 1984
Volume/Section: MALAGA-COSTA DEL SOL
Publisher: SUR
Country: Spain
Language: Spanish

Main Cover Story: Air Force Seeks UFO Negative in Málaga

The lead story on the cover reports that officials from the Spanish Air Force have interviewed the Romero brothers in Málaga to obtain the photographic negative of a UFO they allegedly witnessed and photographed. According to investigator J.J. Benítez, the brothers refused to hand over the negative, considering it private property. Benítez suggests that occupants of these craft may have the ability to control which images are printed, citing previous instances where military or police forces have confiscated UFO photos. He mentions cases in Palma de Mallorca involving José Climent and a TVE filmmaker who had to surrender UFO footage under judicial order.

The article notes that photographic enlargements of the object show a hatch-like feature and a dome. Despite multiple shots being taken, only one clear photograph was captured on the film.

German Commentary on UFO Photography

A section in German discusses the nature of UFO photographs, suggesting that some might be elaborate hoaxes. It mentions that 'Ding' (object) in the image bears a strong resemblance to many UFO photos that are still considered 'real' in international UFOlogy. The text implies that many cases from Europe and other parts of the world are based on such phenomena, with various theories and speculations surrounding them.

UFO Photography Techniques and the 'Mini-Black-Hole'

This section, accompanied by an image of a dark, disc-like object, discusses how some UFO photos might be achieved through simple photographic tricks. It describes how dark paper or cardboard can be cut into a saucer shape and affixed to a windowpane. Using a basic camera, one can then photograph these 'UFOs' against various backgrounds, creating the illusion of a real sighting without complex models or film manipulation. The text refers to such objects as 'absorbing UFOs' because they are black and do not reflect light, even in daylight.

The UMMO Phenomenon

The magazine then shifts focus to the UMMO phenomenon, presenting it as a significant case in UFOlogy, particularly in Germany. It introduces the topic by referencing a drawing made by David Romero, presumably one of the witnesses from the Málaga incident.

UMMO Case Overview and Witness Accounts

Claude Poher of the French National Center for Space Research (CNES) is cited for his research on the UMMO case. The article summarizes witness testimonies from Aluche, San José de Valderas, and Santa Monica in Spain.

• Vicente Ortuno (Colonia C., Aluche) reported seeing a large, disk-shaped, orange-red object with a dark spot on the bottom, which disappeared quickly.
• Maria Ruiz described a very strange object resembling a 'giant eye'.
• Juan Jimenez Diaz saw a peculiar object not from this world, which appeared to open and close a door.

Jose Luis Jordan's Account

In a letter to Eugenio Danyans, psychologist Jose Luis Jordan described seeing a whitish, disk-shaped object near Aluche that changed color to orange. The object was large, emitted a vibrating sound, and had dark markings or openings on its underside, resembling inverted brackets with a line. Three projections with square feet were arranged in a triangle on the underside. The object ascended and disappeared.

The 1966 Vehicle Sighting

Mariano de las Heras, owner of Bar PALENCIA in Aluche, heard from soldiers about a strange vehicle seen in the sky on February 6, 1966.

Herminia Pelaz Blanco's Testimony

Herminia Pelaz Blanco and her husband, along with two others, witnessed an event while playing cards. A man, identified as Jordan, claimed to have seen a terrifying object descend. Two days later, after reporters visited, her husband found a scorched area in a field with three rectangular indentations, measuring 30x15 cm and 12 cm deep, arranged in an equilateral triangle with sides of 6 meters.

Antonio San Antonio's Photographic Evidence

Antonio San Antonio, a photographer for the newspaper 'INFORMACIONES', documented these indentations. He also reported receiving a call from a young man claiming to have seen a flying saucer and offering photographic negatives. San Antonio found five negatives, which were described as unusually sharp but poorly developed, possibly due to an unsuitable developing agent.

Antonio Pardo's Letter and Further Sightings

In a letter dated August 26, 1967, Antonio Pardo described seeing a disk-shaped, orange object with a symbol underneath near San José de Valderas. The object hovered and then vanished. A man in the group took photos, but only two images showed anything, with the others being obscured, possibly due to the lens cap being left on. Pardo also provided addresses of witnesses who saw a disk over Santa Monica.

The Metal Tube and Trace Evidence

Antonio Martin Martin, aged 12, reportedly found a metal tube near the 'Ponderosa' restaurant, where the object was said to have landed. The tube contained a substance that evaporated, and a plastic strip was also found.

Ramirez's Industrial Engineer Account

An industrial engineer named Ramirez reported seeing a strange object estimated to be 15-20 meters in diameter and 8-9 meters thick, at an altitude of 150-200 meters, which later descended to 8-10 meters above the ground before flying off. He noted markings on the underside that might have been guidance or positioning arrangements.

Emilia Garcia's Sighting

Emilia Garcia, a 13-year-old student, described seeing an oval, bright orange-red object resembling a flat omelet near San José de Valderas. It hovered for about 5 minutes before ascending and disappearing towards Madrid. She noted a black symbol on the underside, like a large letter.

Manuel Rivero Ciudad's Observation

Manuel Rivero Ciudad, a businessman, reported seeing a strange, cone-shaped object near the 'Ponderosa' restaurant that moved very quickly and then ascended vertically. It had a diameter of about 10 meters and a ring of small, rotating lights.

Eugenia Arbiol Alonso's Experience

Eugenia Arbiol Alonso observed a large, round object, like a gasoline or water tank, descending from the sky and hovering near the ground for over 2 minutes before disappearing. She also heard about the metal tube but did not see it.

Antonio Munoz's Report

Antonio Munoz, owner of 'La Ponderosa' restaurant, reported that several people came into his restaurant mentioning an orange light or fireball. He later visited the landing site but found nothing. The next morning, the 'three tracks' were present. Munoz stated he never saw the tracks himself. A man drew a symbol that he believed he saw on the object, suggesting it might be from another planet.

'UMMO-BEWEISE' Analysis

Objects and letters from the Pardo case were sent for analysis to the Spanish Institute for Technology, Air and Space Flight. The results of the investigation into the 'UMMO-BEWEISE' (UMMO evidence) are promised for a future report in the CENAP REPORT 100.

New Book Announcement

The article promotes a new book, 'PROJEKT UFO III' by Werner Walter, which covers 'Press and UFOs' and presents documents from the US Air Force intelligence service regarding the UFO situation from 1949 and the development of UFO themes from 1947 to 1966. The book costs DM 35 and can be ordered via bank transfer.

CENAP's 'UFO Trap'

The final pages feature a cartoon by 'K84' depicting Garfield-like character with a cheese labeled 'Int. UFO-Käse' (International UFO Cheese) and a device labeled 'CENAP - UFO - FALLE' (CENAP - UFO - Trap). The text indicates that this is the last page of CR-99 and that CENAP has devised something special for its 100th issue for readers in Germany and abroad.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine appears to focus on UFO sightings, photographic evidence, and the investigation of these phenomena. There is a clear interest in cases involving military or official interest, as seen in the Málaga cover story. The UMMO case is presented as a complex and significant phenomenon with numerous witness accounts and ongoing investigations. The article also touches upon the skepticism surrounding UFO photography, suggesting potential for hoaxes and photographic tricks. The editorial stance seems to be one of serious inquiry into UFO phenomena, while also acknowledging the challenges in verifying evidence and the possibility of misinterpretation or fabrication. The inclusion of the German commentary and the 'UMMO-BEWEISE' analysis suggests an international perspective on UFO research. The promotional material for 'PROJEKT UFO III' and CENAP's 'UFO Trap' indicates a commitment to informing readers about UFO research and publications.