CENAP Report - No 097

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP-REPORT
Issue: Nr. 97
Date: 1984
Publisher: CENAP (centrales erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher phänomene)
Language: German

This issue of CENAP-REPORT delves into UFO phenomena, primarily focusing on a series of sightings over the Canary Islands in 1976 and 1979, with additional reports from Austria in 1983. The magazine presents witness testimonies, media coverage, and details of official investigations and document releases.

UFOs Over Gran Canaria: 1976 and 1979

The lead article, "NOCH EINMAL: UFOS ÜBER GRAN CANARIA" (Once Again: UFOs Over Gran Canaria) by Werner Walter, CENAP-Staff, revisits the significant UFO events that occurred in the Canary Islands region. The article highlights media frenzy surrounding these events, citing headlines from prominent German-language newspapers like BILD-am-Sonntag, BILD, BLICK, and KRONEN ZEITUNG in June 1976. These reports described "hundreds of German tourists" witnessing "giant UFOs" landing and large, winged craft.

Several detailed accounts are presented:

• Monika G.'s Testimony: On June 25, 1976, she observed an "intense, orange-glowing light" over the sea that appeared to be "sucking up water," creating an inexplicable water fountain. The object was visible for about five minutes, and there were disturbances in radio and television reception.
• BILD-am-Sonntag Report: This publication mentioned a "circular burn mark" found after a 20-minute sighting. The UFO was reportedly hovering over the ground near Galdar, described as "transparent" with two "oversized human-like figures" inside. Another witness, Wolfgang Eberlein of 'Badische Neuesten Nachrichten', described a "disc rising from the sea," hovering for ten minutes, and then ascending steeply, causing a "sea vortex to collapse."
• Photographic Evidence: Rolf Tobisch provided slides of a UFO "landing site" in 1977, showing a "turnip field" with a "whitish powder" on the plants, suggesting possible burn marks.

Official Investigations and Document Releases

The article notes that shortly after the alleged landings near Galdar, scientists from NASA and investigators from the Spanish Air Force were reportedly on-site to secure evidence and interview witnesses. It is confirmed that the Spanish Air Force conducted direct investigations, as evidenced by declassified documents. An article from FLYING SAUCER REVIEW (1977) titled "Kanarische Inseln-UFO:22. Juni 1976" is mentioned, suggesting the Spanish government opened its archives, marking a "new, interesting development."

Andreas Kaiser, a Spanish investigator, stated at an international UFO congress in Acapulco (1977) that the Spanish Air Force had begun opening its archives and releasing reports. Juan Jose Benitez, a reporter for LA GACETE DEL NORTE, received 78 pages of documentation from the Spanish government in October 1976, detailing 12 notable UFO cases. While handled on a "private basis," Benitez saw this as an opportunity to publicize the cases.

Jeses Maria Sanchez, Director of the AA Ovnis Investigation Group, reported that the Spanish Air Force documentation primarily consists of cases reported by its own personnel, including numerous photos and film clips taken by pilots.

#### The Events of the Night of June 22, 1976

Witness reports indicate the UFO moved from East to West over the Canary Islands, with concentrations of sightings in three main areas: south of Fuerteventura, northern Gran Canaria, and the western islands of Tenerife, Las Palmas, Gomera, and Hierro. A report from the Ministry of Aviation in Madrid details an incident involving the naval vessel "Corbeta ATREVIDA" on June 22, 1976, at 21:27.

• Naval Report (INFORME 01/76 SOBRE O.V.Ν.Σ.Σ.): The report from the Corbeta ATREVIDA describes an object emitting a "white and blue cone of light with a perfectly circular halo of electric blue color." It ascended from land, hovered, and then ascended steeply. The object was described as "yellowish-blue" with a "small tail." Later, a "large halo of intense yellowish-blue light" remained visible for forty minutes after the object disappeared. The report suggests the phenomenon was local due to the halo's illumination of land and sea.

• Photographic Series: A photo on page 3 is from a series of 36 taken by a private individual near Maspalomas and Playa del Ingles, released by the Spanish government. The object was stationary, close to shore, and very low.

• Dr. Francisco Julio Padron Leon's Account: On June 22, 1976, at 21:50, Dr. Leon and Damasco Diaz Mendoza encountered a "perfectly spherical object" hovering a few feet above the ground. It was transparent, like "a gigantic soap bubble," and emitted a bright light. Inside, two figures dressed in brilliant red were seen. The object ascended slowly, becoming spindle-shaped with a white halo, and moved over the ocean.

Dr. Leon described the experience as unique and spiritually charged, noting a "coldness" that was not purely physical. He compared it to the Concorde, stating that commercial aircraft flights rarely evoke such an emotional response.

Further Sightings and Analysis

Another photo, provided by Gaby Wyrich, is from March 29, 1979, depicting a UFO rising from the sea. This phenomenon has reportedly been seen every few years. Frau Wyrich's uncle, living in the area, captured this image.

• Farmer's Discovery: Two days after the June 1976 event, a farmer near Galdar found a circular area on his turnip field that appeared to have been burned.
• Weather Station Observation: A government weather station crew in Izana observed a UFO to the west. Ernesto Ferrer Galan described the "ocean turning red" and something rising like a "spiral of red, molten metal." Two jade-colored discs then emerged from the spiral, followed by a "huge, white luminous area" resembling a "welding torch flame."

Mariano Medina from the national meteorological institute stated, "I consider it unlikely that it was a meteorological phenomenon. The photos show two completely different things: a twilight... and an object that emits light itself... It could be a projectile, a rocket, a spaceship. Naturally, it is something, it emits its own light and ascends... it is truly a UFO, an unknown flying object."

UFO-Show 1979 and Austrian Reports

The article references a report from CR 39 (May 1979) about a "Gran Canaria-News" item, which followed a smaller report in BILD (March 7, 1979) about a UFO hovering over Tenerife for ten minutes. The 1979 sightings were described similarly to 1976, with a "large light sphere" having a "pyramid-shaped top." Photographer Antonio Gonzales Lopis described the event as a "beautiful phenomenon, a strange sunset." He saw a "glowing thing rising from the seabed, not white, but like old ivory and very shiny."

• Witness Reactions: Many witnesses were deeply affected, with some experiencing emotional breakdowns requiring hospitalization. The UFOs in 1979 were considered more emotionally impactful than those in 1976.
• EM Effects: On the island of Gomera, cars stopped, and their headlights went out, attributed to alleged electromagnetic effects from flying saucers.

CENAP-AUSTRIA NEW'S

This section, authored by Christian Pöchhacker, summarizes UFO events in Austria during 1983, based on five reported cases:

1. St. Pölten/Krems (February 23, 1983): A witness reported a large object hovering over the road.
2. St. Donat (January 25, 1983): Karl Tamegger reported seeing a UFO explode and disintegrate into fiery parts.
3. Zollfeld (January 23, 1983): A UFO was observed.
4. Umgebung Gmünd (April 28, 1983): A hobby astronomer, Siegfried Zechmeister, is seeking corroboration for his measurement of an unidentified flying object's location.
5. Rabenstein/Pielach (July 26, 1983): A UFO was observed.

The section also mentions that the Austrian Ministry of the Interior kept a dozen reports secret. A photo verified as authentic by Americans, taken in 1952 off the coast of California, is presented.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is the persistent occurrence of UFO phenomena, particularly in specific geographical areas like the Canary Islands, and the gradual, albeit slow, opening of official archives and information by governments. CENAP's stance appears to be one of serious investigation and documentation of these events, presenting witness accounts and official data without overt skepticism, but rather with a focus on presenting the evidence and analyses. The magazine aims to inform its readers about the latest developments in UFO research and reporting, encouraging a critical yet open-minded approach to the subject.

This issue of 'MYSTERIER OPPLART' (Mysteries Solved), dated January 20, 1984, published by VG, focuses on UFO investigations and aims to provide scientific explanations for reported aerial phenomena. The magazine covers several cases from Austria, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom, often concluding that the sightings were misidentifications of natural or conventional objects.

Austrian Investigations (1983)

The magazine details several cases investigated by CENAP-AUSTRIA in 1983. The first case involved a witness whose statement about the time of observation contradicted meteorological data regarding sunset, leading to the conclusion that the object was a simple aircraft. Another case on January 23rd, 1983, in Kärnten, described an object splitting into parts, initially suspected to be a satellite re-entry or meteor. On April 28th, 1983, numerous witnesses in Waldviertel observed a high-flying object, which was identified as a stratospheric balloon. A sighting on July 26th, 1983, by an elderly couple of a stationary, multi-light object was attributed to a sun reflection or atmospheric mirage. Finally, a report from September 11th, 1983, concerning a hot air balloon mistaken for a UFO, highlights how easily such misidentifications can occur. The overall conclusion for Austrian sightings in 1983 was that none were genuine UFOs.

NIVFO's Investigations in Hessdalen, Norway

In November 1983, the Norwegian UFO research institute NIVFO visited Hessdalen to conduct investigations. This included witness interviews, photography, and seismographic measurements. A one-hour sky observation between 18:24 and 19:24 yielded no results. Witness Lars Lillevold described an object that was less spectacular than often reported in UFO magazines, appearing as a diffuse, glowing, star-like formation rather than a distinct body. Other witnesses described it as star-like with 'windows and doors.' Seismographic measurements were inconclusive. NIVFO's 1983 report concluded that no reported phenomena provided grounds to identify them as UAPs or UFOs.

German Sighting: Schopfheim Case

The issue features an investigation by Roland Gehardt of CENAP into a sighting in Schopfheim, Germany, on the night of December 14-15, 1983. A witness, Joachim Walter, reported seeing a fast-moving, yellow-gold, disc-shaped object flying low over the town. The object was described as having a silver-gold illuminated front section. Initially, the report suggested the object was a meteor, citing its speed, appearance, and flight behavior, particularly its rapid turn towards Rheinfelden-Basel. Further analysis and a conversation with the witness suggested the object was round and moon-like, and the apparent turn might have been an optical effect. The final conclusion leaned towards it being a meteor.

Rendlesham Forest Revisited

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the Rendlesham Forest incident in the United Kingdom, investigated by Ian Mrzyglod and Martin Shipp of SCUFORI, along with contributions from BUFORA and private UFO researchers Dot Street and Brenda Butler. The incident, occurring between December 27-30, 1980, involved reports of strange lights and a possible crash. Various theories circulated, including an aircraft crash (possibly with nuclear weapons) or a deliberate UFO landing. The article highlights the difficulties in obtaining clear information, the conflicting accounts from different investigators (particularly between SCUFORI and Dot/Brenda), and the lack of official clarification. SCUFORI's investigation focused on visiting the alleged landing site. They found an area that appeared logged rather than crashed upon, with evidence suggesting logging activity rather than a UFO impact. The silver-white coloration of the fallen branches and twigs was a point of interest. Despite Dot Street's belief in radiation effects, SCUFORI's findings suggested logging operations as a more plausible explanation for the cleared area. The article notes that the investigation aimed to determine if the case warranted further in-depth study.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently emphasizes a scientific and rational approach to UFO phenomena. The editorial stance is critical of sensationalism and promotes the identification of sightings as conventional objects or natural occurrences. The magazine highlights the role of misperception, atmospheric conditions, and known aerial activities in explaining many reports. There is a critical view of organizations that may sensationalize or create UFO narratives where none exist, as suggested by the commentary on INTERKOSMOS. The overall message is that while mysterious aerial phenomena are of interest, they should be examined within a scientifically verifiable framework.

Title: UFO NACHRICHTEN
Issue Date: April 1983
Publisher: CENAP-Mannheim
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of UFO NACHRICHTEN delves into UFO investigations and media coverage, with a significant focus on the Rendlesham Forest incident and a critical look at television's portrayal of UFO phenomena.

Investigation into the Woodbridge RAF Base and Rendlesham Forest

The magazine details the findings of SCUFORI investigators Martin Shipp and Affleck regarding alleged events at the Woodbridge RAF Base and Rendlesham Forest. They visited the area, including the Forestry Commission office, which was closed. They observed tractors and machinery, suggesting that logging activities might have been mistaken for a landing site.

The Farmer and the 'Men in Black'

An account is presented of a farmer and his wife who were visited by two 'Men in Black' (MIBs) after a reported 'crash'. The investigators interviewed another farmer living near the airbase, who stated he had heard stories but seen nothing himself. He recalled being questioned by a man and a woman, with the woman described as wearing blue and white. He did not recall being questioned by two men in black.

Animal Disturbances

Brenda Butler's report is cited regarding a farmer who contacted RAF Woodbridge Base about his cattle behaving wildly. He was told no aircraft were flying that night. The investigators spoke with a farmhand at a nearby farm, who mentioned that aircraft frequently flew low over the area, which could agitate the animals. This suggests that animal disturbances might not be directly linked to a UFO landing.

Vehicle Effects

Brenda Butler's report describes an incident where her Ford Cortina Estate Mark I experienced unusual shaking and acceleration while driving on a track in Rendlesham Forest. She estimated the speed at 60-70 mph, despite the difficult terrain. Her companion, Dot, confirmed the speed. SCUFORI investigators later tested a LADA on a similar track, finding it difficult to control at 40 mph due to the poor road conditions and the vehicle's age. They concluded that the effects on Brenda's car might be attributable to the road conditions, vehicle vibrations, and the occupants' heightened emotional state, rather than a UFO.

Television and Electrical Disturbances

Two elderly brothers living near Rendlesham Forest reported flickering televisions and lights in January 1981, coinciding with increased military activity. They had a large antenna to receive signals due to poor reception caused by the dense forest. The investigators concluded that these disturbances were likely due to the forest's dense nature and weather conditions, not necessarily UFO-related.

SCUFORI Conclusions and Critique

SCUFORI's findings led them to believe the case was highly suspect, primarily because all information originated from a single person, Brenda Butler. They questioned the likelihood of an airbase official providing information to an enthusiast like Butler without ensuring confidentiality. The report notes that other individuals, like Paul Begg and Norman Oliver, also received information about unusual events in the Woodbridge area around the same time, but the overall value of these stories was not enhanced.

SCUFORI identified five contradictions in the reports that had not been previously apparent. They concluded that there was no evidence to suggest any of these events were related to a UFO and that the case was likely exaggerated.

TV Program Analysis: 'Unwahrscheinlich-aber wahr?'

The magazine also reviews the new TV series 'Unwahrscheinlich-aber wahr?' (Unlikely-but true?), which began airing on February 27th. Werner Walter attended the recording of a segment. Initially, a UFO discussion was planned, but due to time constraints, it was relegated to a backup slot. Walter observed the production process and spoke with various individuals, including a woman referred to as 'Hexe' Ula von Bernus, police officers who reported a UFO-balloon sighting, and Hans U.Ohl from the Federal Agency for Air Navigation, who provided technical details. Pastor Friedrich Wilhelm Haag of the Evangelical Central Office for Sect Affairs also made strong statements that challenged UFOlogists.

The TV program revisited the case of Rudi Nagora and the Suffolk landing. It was revealed that Nagora had initially agreed to appear but canceled at the last minute. The program also addressed the Suffolk landing, putting UFO proponent Veit in a difficult position. The magazine notes that the program's intent was to present negative aspects and critically examine Veit and his beliefs, which were influenced by a medium named Anny. The author expresses hope that Veit will disengage from the media after this critical treatment.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue demonstrates a critical approach to UFO reports, emphasizing the need for verifiable evidence and cautioning against sensationalism. The SCUFORI investigation into the Rendlesham Forest incident highlights the importance of thorough, independent research and the identification of inconsistencies in witness testimonies. The critique of the TV program suggests an editorial stance that values factual reporting and skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims, particularly when they involve media manipulation or the exploitation of public interest in UFOs. The magazine appears to favor a rational, evidence-based perspective, often questioning the validity of popular UFO narratives.