CENAP Report - No 071

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP – REPORT
Issue: Nr. 71
Volume: 6. Jahrgang/H1/
Date: January 1982
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of CENAP – REPORT delves into two primary subjects: the alleged fabricated claims of UFOlogist George Adamski and an investigation into a widely reported UFO sighting near Gernsheim, Germany.

Adamski's Saturn Trip Debunked

The report begins by addressing rumors and claims circulating among Adamski's followers. Michael Hesemann, a representative of the GEORGE ADAMSKI FOUNDATION, is cited for asserting that Peter Kolosimo's account of Adamski meeting Jesus on Saturn was invented by Kolosimo himself, not Adamski. The article presents a letter from Hesemann, which states that Adamski never made such claims and that Kolosimo's book, "Sie kamen von einem anderen Stern," fabricates details about Adamski's alleged interplanetary encounters.

According to the report, Adamski claimed to have met representatives from various planets in a sort of 'interplanetary UN' and that a trip to Saturn was so taxing it left him critically ill. While Adamski's official publications mentioned a Saturn trip, the report suggests that only close associates received the full details, not the general public or Kolosimo.

Further investigation by the author confirms that Peter Kolosimo, in his book "Sie kamen von einem anderen Stern" (Goldmann Taschenbuchband Nr. 2814, pages 19-21), and Pieter Coll, in his 1970 book "Geschäfte mit der Phantasie" (page 139), both cite these alleged encounters. The author also found a "SPECIAL REPORT: MY TRIP TO THE TWELVE COUNCELLORS' MEETING THAT TOOK PLACE ON SATURN – MARCH 27...30, 1962" by George Adamski, confirming the existence of such a report.

However, the author contacted Peter Kolosimo, who provided detailed information and sent copies of Adamski's "SATURN REPORT PART I" and "SATURN REPORT PART II" from June 1962. Upon reviewing these reports, the author discovered the very passages cited by Kolosimo and Coll, which are presented as evidence against Adamski's credibility. The report includes an excerpt from Adamski's "SATURN REPORT PART II," titled "I LEARN PAST HISTORY OF THE EARTH," which discusses the consciousness of the Creator, Jesus, and the history of Venusians and Martians on Earth. The author sarcastically notes that Adamski even signed this 'nonsense' himself.

The Gernsheim 'Energy UFO' Incident

The second major part of the report details an investigation into a widely publicized UFO sighting near Gernsheim, Germany, on August 30, 1981. The headline "Mehr als 1000 Autofahrer sahen das Energie-IFO bei Gernsheim/Rhein" (More than 1000 drivers saw the Energy UFO near Gernsheim/Rhine) suggests a significant event.

The witness, Helmut Chodan, was driving from Marköbel to Pforzheim when he observed a luminous, disk-shaped object, twice the size of a full moon, hovering over a wooded area near Gernsheim. He described it as having unusual flight movements and changing colors from yellowish-white to fiery red and then bright blue, emitting star-like rays and smaller luminous spheres. Chodan managed to film the object with his camera, estimating the film to be 15 meters long.

To verify the sighting, the author, Walter, contacted various authorities and media outlets. He spoke with the Autobahnpolizei Darmstadt, who had no record of the event. He was directed to the press office of the Regierungspräsidenten in Darmstadt, where a spokesperson initially recalled a newspaper report about a weather balloon sighted near Biblis, not Gernsheim. Further inquiries led to the Polizeistation Lampertheim, where officials also had no immediate knowledge of a UFO sighting but eventually confirmed a report about a weather balloon that had landed in the area.

Walter also contacted the DARMSTÄDTER ECHO newspaper. The local editor referred him to the regional desk, where a journalist, Herr Wallscheck, expressed interest but stated that the newspaper had not reported on the incident. He jokingly asked about the witness's blood alcohol level.

Walter then spoke directly with Helmut Chodan, the witness. Chodan confirmed that his film had not been returned, suspecting it might be with NASA or the CIA. He described the object as a 'scout ship' from a 'mother ship,' a disk without visible structures, appearing as a compact light package. He estimated its size to be between 60-80 meters in diameter and described the experience as almost making him faint due to its intensity.

Reader Contributions and Editorial Stance

The latter part of the magazine includes letters from readers sharing their UFO experiences and opinions. These include contributions from Liselotte B., F., who praises the positive influence of UN publications; Karl-Heinz Wiemann, who highly recommends Daniel Fry's book; and M. Pichler, who suggests a new edition of Orfeo Angelucci's "GEHEIMNIS der Untertassen." Bruder Emanuel shares an account of a mother ship releasing smaller objects and a contact with 'our extraterrestrial brothers.'

The editorial stance is critical of what it perceives as the unserious nature of some UFOlogists and the DUIST organization, stating that "DAMIT HAT DIE SERIÖSE UNTERSUCHUNG DES UFO-PHANOMENS WIRKLICH REIN GAR NICHTS ZU TUN" (This has absolutely nothing to do with serious UFO phenomenon investigation).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFOlogy, particularly the credibility of figures like George Adamski, and the reporting of eyewitness accounts of unexplained aerial phenomena. The editorial stance is one of skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims and a commitment to rigorous investigation, as demonstrated by the detailed inquiry into the Gernsheim sighting. The magazine appears to position itself as a source of serious UFO research, distinct from what it views as sensationalism or unfounded speculation within the UFO community.

This issue of UN Nr. 271, dated December 1981, is a German-language publication focusing on UFO phenomena, military surveillance, and the critical analysis of related reports. The magazine features a cover story with a prominent radar display, hinting at the themes of monitoring and potential threats. The publication appears to be part of a series from "UN" (likely a UFO-related publication) and includes articles by Werner Walter and others, exploring various UFO incidents and the broader context of ufology.

NORAD's Role and False Alarms

The issue details the functions of NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command), highlighting its critical role in monitoring potential threats to North America. The Cheyenne Mountain complex is described as a highly secure facility housing 800 specialists who monitor radar screens and databases for information on Soviet submarines, ships, aircraft, and missile silos. A significant portion of the content is dedicated to explaining the numerous false alarms experienced by NORAD, particularly in June 1980. These alarms, which briefly put the world on the brink of nuclear war, were attributed to technical defects, including a faulty chip that misread data, and the system's routine practice of sending blind test alerts. The magazine also mentions other false alarms, such as one in November 1979 caused by a technician feeding a test tape into the system and another in October 1979 involving a mistaken identification of a re-entering rocket.

UFO Sightings and Investigations

Several UFO sightings are reported and investigated throughout the issue. One notable account describes a large, phosphorescent object observed over Ludwigshafen, Germany, in December 1981, which moved slowly and remained visible for an extended period. Other sightings include an object seen over Frankenthal, described as brightly shining and moving westward, and a similar report from the same area. The magazine also addresses the 'Berlin October Phenomenon' of 1981, where a bright object was seen. Initially speculated to be a UFO, it was later identified by East German authorities and astronomers as a meteorite that entered the atmosphere at high altitude.

The publication also touches upon the psychological aspects of ufology, discussing how the constant exposure to UFO reports might influence researchers. It critically examines the claims of some ufologists, such as those associated with DUIST and the 'Freie Akademie der UFOlogie,' questioning their methods and the sensationalism surrounding their findings. The article suggests that some UFOlogists may be prone to misinterpreting phenomena and engaging in self-aggrandizement.

Specific Incidents and Analysis

One article recounts the incident of a Soviet U-boat (P-137) stranded near Karlskrona, Sweden, in October 1981. While the official explanation involved a broken compass, the magazine speculates whether this event might have been related to a UFO, suggesting that the UFO might have been observed from a secure height.

Another section discusses the identification of the 'Berlin October Phenomenon' as a meteorite. It details the findings of the Prague meteor observatory and the East German 'Akademie der Wissenschaften,' which concluded that the object was a meteorite of modest size that descended at an altitude of 22 km. The report also mentions that the phenomenon was accompanied by acoustic, optical, and seismic signals consistent with a meteorite.

Ufological Perspectives and Critiques

The magazine features an interview with Helmut Chodan, who claims to have had multiple UFO sightings and even filmed them. Chodan discusses his experiences and the challenges of documenting UFOs, noting his success with filming but bad luck with photography. The article also includes a lengthy discourse with a self-proclaimed UFOlogist, Frau Buch, who presents a wide range of UFO-related theories and information, which the author finds to be a 'half-spun ufological world' lacking in factual discussion.

Werner Walter, a recurring author, critically examines the sensationalist reporting of some UFO incidents, particularly those involving the Berlin phenomenon. He contrasts the media's eager speculation with scientific explanations, such as the identification of the Berlin event as a meteorite. The magazine also includes a quote from a 1972 DUIST document that speaks of a 'hard and honest struggle for the ideals and goals of the new type of human being, homo cosmicus,' highlighting the more esoteric and self-promotional aspects of some UFO research groups.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the potential threats posed by military technology (both Soviet and American), the fallibility of advanced surveillance systems like NORAD, and the often-unsubstantiated claims within the field of ufology. The magazine appears to adopt a critical and analytical stance, distinguishing between genuine phenomena and sensationalized or mistaken identifications. It emphasizes the importance of rigorous investigation and scientific explanation while acknowledging the public's fascination with the unknown. The editorial stance seems to lean towards debunking or providing rational explanations for reported UFO events, while also exploring the broader implications of military technology and the psychological aspects of belief systems surrounding UFOs.