Magazine Summary
CENAP-REPORT
Summary
This issue of CENAP-REPORT (Nr. 31, September 1978) details investigations into UFO sightings in Hamburg and Bissendorf. The Hamburg incident on June 14, 1978, involved multiple witnesses describing a winged object, and a metallic body found in a crater. The Bissendorf case also involved multiple witnesses, with a local astronomical society noting a 'susceptibility' of the area to UFO phenomena. The report includes witness testimonies, interviews with astronomers and journalists, and CENAP's analysis, suggesting possible explanations like satellites or meteorites while acknowledging the unusual aspects of the sightings.
Magazine Overview
This document is the 31st issue of the CENAP-REPORT, published in September 1978. CENAP stands for 'centrales erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher phänomene' (central research network for extraordinary phenomena). The report is published by CENAP, with contributions from Hansjürgen Köhler and Werner Walter, who are listed as CENAP leaders based in Mannheim, Germany. The issue is presented in a Schnelldruck (speed print) format, with a goal of delivering approximately 20 pages in DIN-A-5 format.
Table of Contents
The issue contains the following articles:
1. CENAP - Erklärung (CENAP - Explanation)
2. Fall Hamburg (Hamburg Case)
3. DUIST - Flugblatt (DUIST - Flyer)
4. MNL über Bissendorf (MNL about Bissendorf)
5. CENAP's Büchervorschlag (CENAP's Book Recommendation)
6. GALLUP 1974 + 1978
7. NL über Kirn (NL about Kirn)
8. UFOS / USA 1977
9. Fotoseite / CENAP - Archiv (Photo Page / CENAP - Archive)
Editorial and Subscription Information
A letter dated August 27, 1978, from Werner Walter and Hansjürgen Köhler addresses the readers, announcing the new printing possibility for CENAP-REPORT Nr. 31 and expressing hope to regularly deliver 20 pages in a more manageable DIN-A-5 format. They are launching an experiment to make the report more accessible without financial burden to the reader, aiming for a print run of 100 copies, with about 50 sold or exchanged and the rest distributed as free samples to those who previously expressed dissatisfaction with the old printing method. They urge readers to help promote the CENAP-REPORT to increase circulation. The annual subscription price is DM 24,--, with payment to be made to the provided Postcheckkonto. They also mention facing financial pressure and welcome voluntary contributions.
Case Report: Fall Hamburg (Hamburg Case)
This section details an investigation into a UFO sighting reported in Hamburg on June 14, 1978. The BILD newspaper reported that 25 people contacted the Hamburg Observatory about seeing a yellow-red glowing, sparkling object without wings. Annegret Leithoff, a housewife, described the object as being 500 meters above her garden, the size of a plane but without wings, glowing at the front and having a sparkling fishtail at the rear. Captain Günther Ehlers also reported observing two large celestial bodies. CENAP began its research on the same day the BILD report became known, contacting the Hamburg Observatory and the Hamburg Air Traffic Control. An astronomer, Mr. Lohsen, confirmed various phenomena were observed. He noted that the BILD report referred to an event on June 14, 1978, around 21:40. Lohsen suggested that the object might have been a descending satellite or a fireball, as described by 7-8 people. He mentioned that while astronomers did not take photographs, there are meteor tracking systems in CSSR and Southern Germany, though he was unsure if they captured anything. He attributed the lack of photos to the sky being too bright and the moon shining. Some descriptions were unusual, including something described as 'helicopter-like' and a 'red sphere' visible for 15-20 minutes. Lohsen explained a cylinder-shaped object without wings, seen during twilight, might have been a high-flying aircraft, possibly from the air force, illuminated by the sun in such a way that the wings were projected away. The sightings occurred in the Hamburg local area, with some witnesses unsure if the object was departing or approaching the airport. Some reported hearing a whistling sound, which Lohsen believed might be a misperception. He stated that a total of 34 people reported seeing these objects, possibly over Altona near the harbor. Lohsen used a criterion for witness credibility: if they could not identify or describe the position of Venus, their testimony was dismissed. One lady even reported a rocket landing and green men emerging, leading to the observatory quickly ending the call. The BILD newspaper was contacted, and a journalist named Koch was assigned to the story. Koch reported that on the same evening, a metallic object landed in the garden of Dipl.-Physiker Hellmut Jentzsch in Hamburg-Trelde-Buchholz, creating a crater and browning the grass. In the crater, a body the size of a hen's egg was found, described as slightly deformed, resembling cast lead, and weighing 3.5 kg, not radioactive. Jentzsch, a chief photo lab technician, took photos of the crater. Koch's initial conclusion was a piece of rocket debris, and the object was sent for technical examination. However, Hansjürgen Köhler doubted that the object's stillness, as reported by a witness, could be explained by a satellite or re-entry. Further research was promised.
Day 2 of Investigation, June 23, 1978
Following up on Hansjürgen Köhler's report, the investigator contacted witnesses. Annegret Leithoff (34) confirmed the sighting on June 14, 1978, around 21:40. She described the object as having a red glowing tip like an arrowhead, about 1 meter long, with a small point at the rear. It flew low, at helicopter height, silently, and slowly. She saw it with a friend. BILD also reported a witness from Bad Segeberg who heard noises, unlike Leithoff's observation which was silent. The object moved from southeast to north and disappeared into a cloud bank. Leithoff firmly believed it was not an aircraft, noting that sunset was around 20:40, and the object was visible an hour later. She ruled out a shooting star, having seen many before. The object was observed from a quiet location, suggesting any sound should have been audible. Its movement was slow and steady. She offered to fill out a CENAP questionnaire and send a sketch. Despite receiving six other names and numbers, the investigator could not reach them. Attempts to contact Helmut Jentzsch were also unsuccessful.
Further Witness Accounts and Analysis
A woman named Grenzing reported seeing the phenomenon with three other people, all describing it as a large shooting star. She contacted the observatory after seeing a BILD call for reports. Her sighting on June 14, 1978, around 21:50, described the 'shooting star' as unusually long, about 1/4 minute. The investigator informed her this was within normal limits. Captain Günther Ehlers could not be reached directly. In a letter dated June 30, 1978, Annegret Leithoff reiterated her certainty of seeing a UFO, stating she had never seen anything like it and could not provide a normal explanation. Her time estimate was approximate. She observed the phenomenon from Hamburg-Harburg. She and Chr. Westedt saw the object simultaneously. She estimated its size at about 1 meter long and a quarter of the moon's size. A sketch comparing the object's size to the moon was included. The object's contour was sharp and clearly visible, moving silently in a hovering manner, comparable to slow drifting. This was contrasted with its rapid movement, similar to a satellite, which was announced for Friday, June 23, 1978, at 22:24. Annegret Leithoff and her husband observed this satellite and noted the object moved with similar speed. She had a clear view, with a cloud bank to the north. The temperature was 12-14 degrees Celsius. She definitively ruled out an aircraft, stating she knew nothing about atmospheric mirages in their region. She provided a sketch of the trajectory and a diagram of the flight path relative to the horizon and a potential entry point. CENAP's annotation suggests that identification as a METEORIT/Fireball or Re-Entry is plausible, but they cannot entirely dismiss other explanations. The witness admits to not possessing astronomical knowledge and that distance estimation at night is difficult, relying on personal impression, which felt like more than 500 meters. A diagram illustrates the atmospheric layer and a potential flight path of a meteorite.
DUIST - Flugblatt (DUIST - Flyer)
This section features a flyer titled 'Der unbekannte Prophet Jakob Lorber' (The Unknown Prophet Jakob Lorber). It includes a drawing of a figure in a helmet with antennae, labeled 'Lola', and text posing questions about the origin of messages from Mars or Venus, or if they are 'brain spins' from the DUIST sect. It states that through this prophet, their life path was determined for service to the Lord and humanity, and they were voluntarily sent to Earth.
MNL über Bissendorf (MNL about Bissendorf)
This article, a continuation from CR-Nr. 30, reports on a sighting in Bissendorf. A woman named Koza reported seeing a luminous object and called the police. The house residents were initially dismissive, but later confirmed seeing the 'UFO'. Four people confirmed the sighting, stating they could hardly believe it themselves and expected to be laughed at. Two young men in an Opel Kadett also witnessed the event. Two women in a VW Beetle were reportedly frightened and hid in the back seats. Augustin Winterberg of the German Weather Service in Osnabrück, who was on duty at the time, did not observe anything. Erwin Heiser, chairman of the 'Astronomical Working Group' in Osnabrück, could not confirm the Bissendorf phenomenon but noted a certain 'susceptibility' of the Bissendorf area to UFOs, recalling a previous report from the same location.
CENAP's Book Recommendation
This section is not detailed in the provided scan.
GALLUP 1974 + 1978
This section is not detailed in the provided scan.
NL über Kirn
This section is not detailed in the provided scan.
UFOS / USA 1977
This section is not detailed in the provided scan.
Fotoseite / CENAP - Archiv (Photo Page / CENAP - Archive)
This section is not detailed in the provided scan.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, detailed investigations, witness testimonies, and attempts at scientific analysis and explanation. CENAP positions itself as a research network dedicated to extraordinary phenomena, actively investigating reports and encouraging public participation. The editorial stance is one of open inquiry, seeking to gather and analyze information, while acknowledging the challenges and limitations of such investigations, including financial constraints and the need for credible witness accounts. The issue highlights the 'Fall Hamburg' and 'MNL über Bissendorf' as primary case studies, showcasing CENAP's methodology and commitment to exploring these unexplained events.
This issue of CENAP, a publication from the "centrales erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher phänomene" (Central Research Network for Extraordinary Phenomena), delves into various aspects of UFO research and sightings. The issue, dated April 1978/Nr.4, includes a book review, statistical analyses of UFO beliefs in Canada, and detailed case studies from Germany and the USA.
Book Review: J. Allen Hynek's "The UFO Experience"
The magazine features a review of J. Allen Hynek's book, "The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry," presented in a German paperback format. The review highlights Hynek's extensive experience as a scientific advisor to the U.S. Air Force and his efforts to provide a credible and well-documented resource for those interested in the UFO phenomenon. Hynek aims to answer common questions about UFOs, distinguishing between natural phenomena, misidentifications, and genuinely unexplained cases. He emphasizes the need for honest, prejudice-free reporting based on facts and thorough documentation, rather than sensational storytelling. The book is intended to present UFO reports as experienced by individuals, treating their accounts with the same reality as everyday experiences.
Canadian UFO Surveys: Gallup 1974 & 1978
This section presents comparative data from two Gallup Institute surveys conducted in Canada in 1974 and 1978. The surveys aimed to gauge Canadians' opinions on UFOs. In 1974, 67% of respondents had heard of UFOs, and by 1978, this figure rose to 81%. The data breaks down perceptions by age groups (under 30, 30-49, 50/older) regarding whether they had heard of UFOs, seen UFOs, and whether they believed UFOs were real. In 1974, 12% reported seeing UFOs, with 53% believing they were real. By 1978, 10% reported seeing UFOs, and 46% believed they were real. The surveys were conducted by 'The Canadian Institute of Public Opinion,' with sources cited as the Toronto STAR and Montreal STAR.
Case Study: Kirn/Nahe, Germany (August 24, 1977)
This report details a sighting that occurred on August 24, 1977, in Hochstetten-Dhaun, Germany. Four witnesses—Helmut Reit (a master craftsman), his wife Hannelore, their daughter Klaudia, and nephew Thomas Gutheil—reported seeing two objects between 22:20 and 22:22. The objects were described as larger than the full moon, with a yellow-orange, bright light that appeared to extinguish from the inside out. At arm's length, the lights were compared to a tennis ball (approx. 6 degrees). The witnesses experienced fear and unease, stating, "I knew immediately that this was not normal. I was afraid for a short time." The objects were described as stationary. The report notes that the GEP (Gemeinschaft zur Erforschung unbekannter Phänomene) in Lüdenscheid suggested that the objects might be rare reflections on the windshield, a theory considered probable by researcher Hans-Werner Peiniger. The German Weather Service and the Federal Aviation Authority could not explain the phenomenon. The report concludes that while the Reit sighting is difficult to explain, the flattening on the side of one light could be attributed to the refraction of the curved windshield.
Case Study: Galax and Grayson County, USA (October 5, 1977)
This report describes a sighting on Wednesday, October 5, 1977, in the Galax and Grayson County area of the USA. Citizens reported seeing an unidentified flying object, which was later identified as a balloon. The balloon had been launched on October 3, 1977, by the National Scientific Balloon Facility in Maulden, Montana. The photograph accompanying the report was taken by Dan Doughtie as the balloon-UFO appeared over the Blue Ridge Parkway. The article reminds readers that not everything seen in the sky is a UFO.
UFOs/USA 1977 Statistics
The year 1977 is characterized as not being outstanding for particularly mysterious or fruitful UFO cases. The report highlights that out of 903 reports received by the IUR (International UFO Reporter) through the Police HOTLINE of the Center for UFO-Studies and private submissions, only 83 remained unidentified after intensive investigations. The majority of these reports involved night lights and daytime discs. Notably, there were no RADAR-VISUAL sightings (though one from Alaska was under investigation) and only one 'Close Encounter of the Second Kind' incident. A geographical distribution map of UFO cases by type across the USA is included.
Monthly UFO Trends (USA)
A graph illustrates the monthly percentage of unidentified UFO reports in the USA from January to December. The data shows significant fluctuations throughout the year, with peaks and troughs. The report notes that while the average percentage of UFO reports might be around 9.2%, the value of the data for a specific year is more significant. The article also touches upon 'IFO' reports (identified flying objects, such as man-made craft or natural phenomena), suggesting a different distribution pattern compared to UFOs, forming a 'strip' from the Midwest to New England and through California. Further details on IFO categories are promised for a future CENAP-REPORT.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena, the importance of credible documentation, and the statistical analysis of sightings. CENAP appears to adopt a rigorous approach, seeking to explain phenomena through scientific inquiry and data analysis, while acknowledging the existence of genuinely unexplained cases. The editorial stance emphasizes a critical yet open-minded perspective, distinguishing between misidentifications, natural occurrences, and potentially anomalous events. The magazine aims to provide readers with factual information and reasoned analysis, encouraging them to critically evaluate UFO reports.
Es war kein UFO, das kann ich nicht bestätigen
Key Incidents
Multiple witnesses reported seeing a yellow-red glowing, sparkling object without wings hovering over a garden at 21:40. It was described as large as a plane but without wings, with a sparkling fishtail.
A metallic object landed in a garden, creating a crater and turning the grass brown. A small, egg-sized, deformed body was found in the crater.
A luminous object was observed by multiple people, including two young men and women in a car. The object was described as a 'UFO' and caused fear among witnesses.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is CENAP?
CENAP stands for 'centrales erforschungsnetz außergewöhnlicher phänomene' (central research network for extraordinary phenomena) and publishes the CENAP-REPORT.
What was the main UFO sighting reported in this issue?
The main report details a sighting on June 14, 1978, in Hamburg, where multiple witnesses observed a glowing object without wings, and a metallic body was found in a crater.
What explanations were considered for the sightings?
Possible explanations included falling satellites, fireballs, or aircraft. However, some witnesses and CENAP investigators found these explanations insufficient for certain aspects of the sightings.
How can one subscribe to the CENAP-REPORT?
The annual subscription price is DM 24,--. Payment should be made to the Postcheckkonto listed in the letterhead, with 'Ein Jahr CR-Abo' noted on the recipient section. Voluntary rounding up of the amount is appreciated due to financial constraints.
In This Issue
People Mentioned
- Hansjürgen KöhlerCENAP leader
- Werner WalterCENAP leader
- Annegret LeithoffWitness
- Günther EhlersCaptain
- Herr LohsenAstronomer
- Herr KruseEditor
- Herr KochJournalist
- Hellmut JentzschDipl.-Physiker
- Chr. WestedtContact
- Jakob LorberProphet
- Erwin HeiserChairman of the Astronomical Working Group
- Augustin WinterbergGovernment Senior Secretary
- +8 more
Organisations
- CENAP
- BILD
- Hamburger Sternwarte
- Flugsicherung HAMBURG
- Deutscher Wetterdienst
- Astronomische Arbeitsgruppe
- Naturwissenschaftlichen Verein Osnabrück
- GEP
- NASA
- UNO
- IUR
- Gallup Institute
- The Canadian Institute of Public Opinion
- National Scientific Balloon Facility
Locations
- Hamburg, Germany
- Bissendorf, Germany
- Kirn, Germany
- USA, USA
- Altona, Germany
- Trelde-Buchholz, Germany
- Osnabrück, Germany
- Nahe, Germany
- Hochstetten-Dhaun, Germany
- Canada, Canada
- Toronto, Canada
- Montreal, Canada
- Alaska, USA
- New England, USA
- +5 more