CENAP Newsflash - No 20

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP - NEWSFLASH
Issue: Nr. 20
Date: June 2006
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, a long-standing German non-commercial UFO journal, focuses on the critical distinction between 'Ufology' and 'UFO Research'. The cover features a striking image of rocky mountains with a faint, unidentified object in the sky, accompanied by the headline "Schwerpunkt: Ufologie vs. UFO-Forschung" (Focus: Ufology vs. UFO Research).

CENAP Report

The CENAP REPORT is described as one of the oldest German, non-commercial UFO journals published privately. The impressum identifies Werner Walter as the publisher and editor, located in Mannheim. CENAP, founded in 1976, is a private, non-commercial, and ideologically independent organization dedicated to receiving, analyzing, and evaluating reports of alleged unidentified flying objects (UFOs). It adopts a critical position and is associated with the GWUP (Society for the Scientific Investigation of the Paranormal) and the Society for Anomalistics. CENAP collaborates with various national and international institutions, maintains a worldwide network, exchanges information, and has built an extensive UFO video archive. Its objectives include public education and demystification of the UFO topic through media collaborations (TV, radio, press, internet) and scientific institutions (universities, planetariums, observatories, adult education centers) via lectures and public discussions.

Ufologie vs. UFO-Forschung

This central article delves into the fundamental differences and often antagonistic relationship between Ufology and UFO Research. It begins with quotes from Albert Einstein and André Gide, setting a philosophical tone.

Introduction

The author questions whether Ufology offers genuine answers and for whom, suggesting that attractive elements like 'real pictures' often overshadow deeper self-analysis. Ufological 'preaching' is compared to 'Bible interpretation,' where one can compose narratives to fit preconceived notions. This approach is characterized as a 'playroom' activity, leading to a 'deluge' of unsubstantiated claims. The ufological community is described as fascinated by the idea of aliens in 'flying saucers,' with their activities sometimes appearing as 'civil disobedience' or a 'rebellion against the establishment,' possibly fueled by the esoteric movement and its secret teachings.

The article posits that for many ufologists, this creates a 'paradise' or 'promised land' dominated by 'lies' and 'poker-faced bluffing.' It suggests this can be a form of mental 'concentration camp.' Many ufologists are depicted as lacking knowledge of UFO history or the background of classic cases they discuss, often ignoring evidence that contradicts their beliefs. A lack of interest in research results leads to unsystematic arguments and difficulty in problem-solving. Constant indoctrination within their own groups, from which escape is difficult, and social assimilation are highlighted, leading to a risk of alienation from normal life, as seen in some 'Grey abductees' and UFO-esoterics.

The Nature of Belief and Skepticism

The author observes that UFOlogists often seek validation from like-minded individuals who 'understand' them. This tendency is seen as a fundamental problem, with external observers noticing signs that the ufologists themselves may miss. Attempts to point out these issues can lead to a backlash from 'half-strong' individuals and 'Skeptics' who are labeled 'UFO-Nay-sayers.' These skeptics advocate for a cool, objective examination of the UFO phenomenon, aiming to act as 'development workers' for the topic, a role often misunderstood or rejected.

This objective approach is uncomfortable for UFO fans who wish to escape reality and risk becoming fanatics in defense of their 'ufological idea.' Aggression can escalate when confronted with this reality. Some UFO researchers engage in 'psycho-hygiene' to cope, while others exhibit a mentality perceived as alien. Despite this, there's a shared obligation to treat the UFO topic more seriously on a broader level, including respectful inter-group communication. However, the author expresses pessimism about achieving this, likening it to a 'natural law.'

Footnote (1): The author states they have no understanding for research within the context of preserving belief, considering it an 'ideal' for belief preservation.

Footnote (2): This point clarifies that UFO researchers do not actively search for UFOs; rather, UFO reports come to them. These reports must be handled with qualification. The actual UFOs are not on the 'lab table,' nor are they for ufologists. They only deal with reports, which is distinct from the UFOs themselves. This distinction is often missed, even by pioneers like J.A. Hynek. The author also criticizes the common misuse of the U.F.O. acronym as 'unknown' or 'unidentifiable' flying object, suggesting it's a deliberate tactic to mislead.

Invisible Enemy Patrol

The author likens the situation to a provocation, where truth is presented like pure wine. Ex-members of cults and ufology often admit to having been 'stupid.' When they speak out, they are often treated as unwelcome 'system errors' or attacked as 'traitors.' Unlike in some regimes where religious conversion can lead to death, in Germany, one can convert without facing such extreme consequences. The article references the case of an Afghan who converted to Christianity and faced a death sentence, highlighting the persistence of traditional beliefs even after political change.

Personal Journey and Skepticism

The author recounts their own experience, which led them to become a German 'UFO super-skeptic.' This position has made them a point of friction and a symbolic 'enemy image' within ufology. They see themselves as a reformer, advocating for necessary reforms within Ufology for its own development. The goal is not to suppress Ufology but to foster genuine research. They distinguish themselves from 'holy warriors' who might enforce a particular dogma. The UFO community is seen as comprising many individuals who engage with the topic for mere amusement.

The article addresses the prevalence of hoaxes and fakes in UFO research, noting that even researchers can fall prey to them. This suggests that the visible issues are just the tip of the iceberg. The author expresses concern about the difficulty of establishing 'knowledge of where one stands' in the UFO field, which is described as a minefield. The core task of UFO research, in their view, is to identify and neutralize those who play deceptive games.

Footnote (1): This footnote elaborates on the Afghan constitution and Sharia law, explaining the severe consequences for apostasy, including the death penalty, and how this legal framework impacts individuals who convert from Islam.

Footnote (2): This section discusses the author's experience with the UFO entertainment scene, which they claim is not interested in further explanations or qualified use of information. Instead, they prefer isolation, hindering constructive dialogue. This is contrasted with the PISA study's findings on reading habits, suggesting a lack of willingness to engage with complex topics among some UFO enthusiasts.

The UFO Community's Need for Consensus

The author argues that the UFO community needs a sensible solution and an end to internal disputes to be taken seriously. They propose a new 'collective bargaining agreement' for the UFO topic. However, consensus talks between major UFO organizations like CENAP & GEP and DEGUFO & MUFON-CES have failed due to fundamental rejection by pro-UFO groups. There is a lack of exchange, as researchers from DEGUFO & MUFON-CES reportedly do not desire it. Internal warnings have allegedly been issued to MUFON-CES members not to share case materials with CENAP personnel, as this would lead to investigation. Cases that were nevertheless investigated by CENAP from MUFON-CES sources reportedly became 'flops.'

The author warns against sinking into an unrealistic 'X-Files' parallel world in search of the 'extraordinary,' which is perceived as missing from science. This is linked to Ufology's lack of a 'values debate' and its tendency to be populated by 'storytellers.' The need is for investigators, not philosophers or charlatans, and certainly not those 'blinded by the power of illusion' who are devoted to the alien-UFO idea rather than reality. While the ufological union desires collective success, dissenting voices (skeptics) are seen as disruptive. The author, who helped shape UFO media reporting for a decade, believes this will be unwelcome to many UFO fans, potentially causing them concern for the ufological idea itself.

The Problem of UFO Belief

The article critiques the tendency to view UFOs as a form of 'space-age gods,' providing meaning and order, similar to religious beliefs. This projection of human desires onto UFOs is seen as a fundamental aspect of their defense. The author draws parallels between the human psyche, God, and UFOs, suggesting that all are immeasurable and subject to fantasy. This is compared to how mystics in religions and 'parapsychology' have historically influenced others into believing communities.

Footnote (1.1.): The author finds it coincidental that the U.F.O. acronym was coined by Capt. Ruppelt of the USAF's Project Blue Book. This project aimed to determine if UFO reports posed a threat to national security. Ruppelt's effort to replace 'flying saucers' with the more neutral 'unidentified flying objects' was partly to reduce the emotional and fantastical associations with the term.

Historical Context and Misinterpretation

During the Cold War, the US was concerned about unidentified aerial phenomena, not necessarily as alien invasions, but as potential Soviet advanced weaponry. The article notes that UFO enthusiasts and 'alien friends' have consistently failed to reconcile this reality with their own concepts, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding. An example cited is the former CIA Director R. Hillenkoetter's statement in the New York Times in 1960, expressing concern about UFOs among high-ranking Air Force officers. While seemingly alarming, the author suggests that a sober analysis reveals the lack of genuine alien threat.

Loyalty and Research Obstacles

The author discusses the concept of loyalty within the UFO community, suggesting a preference for staying within the group rather than engaging with outsiders. While acknowledging that investigators and defectors may face opposition, they advocate for listening to dissenting voices rather than resorting to 'stoning rituals.'

Regarding research, the article states that participation in UFO phenomenon research is open to anyone willing to engage seriously. However, even among those who claim to do so, there is a lack of consensus. CENAP & GEP's attempts to initiate consensus talks with DEGUFO & MUFON-CES were reportedly rejected. There is a lack of genuine exchange, as researchers from DEGUFO & MUFON-CES allegedly do not desire it. Furthermore, internal warnings within MUFON-CES have reportedly advised members against sharing case materials with CENAP personnel, as this would lead to investigation. Cases that CENAP did manage to investigate from MUFON-CES sources reportedly ended in failure.

The author warns that without genuine research and critical engagement, one risks falling into an unrealistic 'X-Files' parallel world, seeking the 'extraordinary' because it is perceived as absent from science. This is attributed to Ufology's lack of a true 'values debate' and its prevalence of 'storytellers' rather than investigators. The article criticizes the 'Blinded By The Power Of Illusion' mindset, which prioritizes devotion to the alien-UFO idea over reality. While the ufological union seeks collective success, dissenting voices like skeptics are often met with resistance. The author, who was influential in UFO media reporting for a decade, believes this critical perspective is often unwelcome and may cause concern among UFO enthusiasts.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical analysis of UFO phenomena, distinguishing between belief-based Ufology and evidence-based UFO Research. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of scientific skepticism, rigorous investigation, and a rational approach to understanding UFO reports. The publication emphasizes the dangers of misinformation, fanatical belief systems, and the lack of genuine scientific inquiry within much of the UFO community. It advocates for transparency, open dialogue, and a move away from sensationalism and unsubstantiated claims towards a more grounded understanding of the topic. The author expresses a strong belief that the UFO phenomenon, when stripped of its fantastical elements, offers little evidence for extraterrestrial visitation and that much of the discourse is driven by psychological needs and misinterpretations rather than objective reality. The issue also touches upon the historical context of UFO research and its entanglement with geopolitical fears and the desire for meaning. The overall tone is critical, analytical, and somewhat pessimistic about the possibility of achieving genuine consensus or progress within the broader UFO community due to ingrained beliefs and resistance to critical examination.

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, dated June 2006, delves into a critical examination of Ufology and related phenomena like esotericism, presenting them as symptomatic of broader societal issues and a retreat from rational thought.

The Appeal of the Extraordinary and Societal Deficits

The articles suggest that the established education system and scientific worldview can seem 'dull' to people, leading them to seek 'extraordinary' experiences. Religion previously filled this role, but now Ufology and esotericism are presented as new belief systems offering 'action' and 'meaning.' The author posits that these phenomena are a mirror to societal conditions, reflecting deficits that are often unacknowledged by those affected. This trend is seen as a potential erosion of core cultural principles, possibly driven by a loss of faith in the modern scientific worldview and a rejection of traditional religious answers.

Esotericism, Conspiracy Theories, and the 'Re-enchantment' of the World

The issue discusses the rise of conspiracy theories, some even containing 'unconstitutional' content, which have become bestsellers. It questions whether this represents a return to pre-modern belief systems because the modern scientific worldview has lost its persuasive power. While acknowledging that not everyone is embracing this 're-enchantment,' the author notes that a segment of society seeks refuge in esotericism and similar fields to escape the perceived meaninglessness and bureaucracy of industrial-modern life. These individuals are described as outsiders or dropouts, a phenomenon that has always existed.

The Disconnect Between Scientific Achievement and Personal Experience

A key point raised is the contradiction between scientific advancements, such as space travel, and the individual's feeling of exclusion and inability to meet even basic daily needs. This disconnect leads to a loss of faith in science, prompting a search for alternative explanations and beliefs, such as the idea of 'supernatural wonders.' The article suggests that the disillusionment with the 'disenchanted,' mechanistic, materialistic worldview drives people towards seeking 'hidden mysteries' as a form of personal 'liberation' or 'self-enhancement.'

The 'Hidden' and the Pursuit of Power

Some individuals or groups are accused of manipulating the concept of 'hidden' knowledge to gain power. The 'preachers of the hidden' may not even believe in what they promote but profit from the public's 'treasure hunt' for such secrets. This is likened to the legend of Lorelei, a siren-like figure, with flying saucers being the 'heavenly Lorelei' – an unattainable ideal that distracts from reality.

Ufology as a Myth and a Subversive Act

The article criticizes the way Ufology often functions, where enthusiasts 'lovingly cultivate' their myths, overlooking inconsistencies. This is described as a 'subversive attitude' or a 'psychic culinary journey' driven by ignorance. People who 'don't really know and don't want to understand' are susceptible to 'brainwashing' and manipulation by commercial interests, UFO popularizers, and sensationalist media. Blind faith, rather than critical inquiry, is seen as the driving force.

The Nature of UFOlogy and its Critics

Ufology is characterized as a field where research is often replaced by 'escalation-prone disputes' driven by blind faith in its promises. The author contrasts this with scientific research, advocating for a 'cool head' and patience before forming beliefs. While acknowledging the shared curiosity between UFO proponents and skeptics, the article points out that Ufology often lacks deeper background knowledge and gets bogged down in superficial debates. Conflicts arise when critics question the core beliefs of the UFO community, which often responds with polemics rather than reasoned arguments.

Youth and UFOlogy

Young people are identified as a key demographic in UFO research issues. An example is given of the NUFORC hotline being flooded with hoax calls from children. This is linked to their phase of identity formation and a general conflict with the adult world, leading them to seek stability in fantasy worlds.

The Scientific Approach vs. Dogmatism

The author contrasts the scientific approach of examining evidence and testing hypotheses with the dogmatic approach often seen in Ufology. The scientific method requires critical thinking and self-criticism, whereas Ufology is accused of immunizing its ideas against criticism through 'auxiliary constructions.' The core problem, according to the article, is the difficulty in distinguishing perception from interpretation, and how personal biases can influence the understanding of phenomena.

The 'Hidden Teachings' and the Loss of Meaning

Ufology is described as a 'secret teaching' that attempts to synthesize philosophy, religion/esotericism, and science, aiming to overcome the modern separation of faith and knowledge. However, the article argues that Ufology's claim to be science can be easily refuted. It suggests that many UFO reports are actually IFOs (Identified Flying Objects), and that the sheer quantity of these misidentifications is significant enough to demythologize much of the UFO narrative.

The Role of 'Greyhunters' and Misinformation

The issue touches upon specific cases, such as the 'Greyhunter-News' and alleged UFO documentaries, questioning their authenticity and the motives behind their promotion. The author criticizes the practice of 'cooking up' stories as mysteries without proper investigation, suggesting that this preys on the 'naivety' of the UFO audience. The article also mentions the 'UFO-Welle über Belgien' (UFO Wave over Belgium) case, noting that while some sources claim scientific confirmation of UFOs, others view CENAP's explanations as 'fairy tales.'

CENAP's Stance and the Nature of UFO Research

CENAP is presented as a group that aims to critically examine UFO phenomena. The article defends CENAP's approach, contrasting it with what it perceives as sensationalism and a lack of critical rigor in other UFO circles. It highlights the importance of scientific skepticism and the need for thorough investigation, distinguishing between genuine scientific inquiry and the promotion of beliefs.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes are the critique of Ufology as a belief system rather than a science, the societal factors that drive people towards such beliefs (disillusionment, search for meaning), the role of media and commercial interests in promoting these ideas, and the importance of critical thinking and evidence-based investigation. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, advocating for a rational and scientific approach to unexplained phenomena, while acknowledging the human need for wonder and the extraordinary.

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, dated June 2006, focuses on a critical examination of ufology and its relationship with scientific methodology. The publication argues that ufological beliefs often stem from emotional needs and desires rather than empirical evidence, contrasting this with the rigorous principles of scientific inquiry as exemplified by Charles Darwin and K. R. Popper.

The Nature of Belief and Science

The article posits that many people are drawn to esoteric, occult, and ufological ideas because these offer answers to their wishes, fears, and hopes, creating a 'wonder world in a package.' However, it stresses that scientific criticism of these beliefs is often met with incomprehension or aggression, particularly when it challenges deeply held convictions. The core of science, it is argued, lies not in formulating hypotheses but in rigorously testing them. The principle of 'beyond any reasonable doubt' from American jurisprudence is invoked to highlight the high standard of evidence required for scientific acceptance, a standard that 'real UFOs' often fail to meet.

The text acknowledges that different cultures and individuals perceive reality differently, citing the contrast between scientific understanding of disease (viruses) and shamanic beliefs (evil spirits). It suggests that while science is considered authoritative in Western culture, other belief systems like astrology, shamanism, or ufology are also accepted by many, and individuals are free to choose what they believe.

Critiques of Ufology

A central theme is the critique of ufology's methodology and its practitioners. The author suggests that many UFO enthusiasts are not interested in genuine research but in maintaining their personal opinions and beliefs. The publication criticizes the tendency within ufology to demand proof of non-existence ('Prove to me that it doesn't exist!') rather than providing evidence for claims. It distinguishes between the alleged phenomenon and its explanation, using the example of the Loch Ness Monster.

The article laments that while scientific knowledge is valued in Western culture, other perspectives, such as those of indigenous shamans, offer different truths. It points out that ufology, like other belief systems, can become a framework for social orientation and self-understanding, raising the question of whether ufology should be considered a belief system or even a religion.

The Role of 'UFOlogists' and the 'AllMystery' Community

The author describes an encounter with the 'AllMystery' community, where a sharp tone and 'ufological excitement' can override logic. The article notes that while some are 'mercenaries for ufology,' others are 'guest workers,' suggesting a mix of genuine interest and perhaps less rigorous engagement. The author aims to expose errors and falsehoods within ufology, but this is sometimes perceived as a humiliation by UFO enthusiasts, who are reluctant to abandon their existing beliefs.

The text criticizes the lack of quality assurance in ufological claims, emphasizing that it should be the primary focus. It highlights the difficulty of proving a negative and the tendency for UFO proponents to shift the burden of proof. The article also touches upon the 'Alien-UFO' phenomenon, suggesting that it may serve to satisfy mental and emotional needs rather than representing genuine extraterrestrial contact.

Scientific Rigor vs. Belief

The author asserts that scientific research begins by examining reality and distinguishing facts from fiction, a process that can be challenging when confronted with popular ufological narratives. The article acknowledges the existence of 'guest workers' in UFO research, individuals who may bring scientific perspectives but are not necessarily fully committed to ufology. The author's own efforts to point out errors in ufology are sometimes met with resistance, as UFO enthusiasts find it difficult to deviate from their established beliefs.

The publication distinguishes between the 'claimed fact' and the 'offered explanation,' stressing the need for empirical knowledge over belief systems. It notes that while many UFO claims are presented, their evidentiary quality is often questionable, being susceptible to deliberate or unintentional deception. The article suggests that the global ufology scene does not always align with the goals of UFO phenomenon research, describing it as an 'uncanny encounter with the old grandmother UFOlogy,' whose promoters skillfully mislead the public.

The Nature of Memory and Evidence

The article delves into the fallibility of human memory, explaining that it reconstructs experiences rather than recording them like a film. This reconstruction process, influenced by 'scripts' or typical expectations, can lead to errors, especially when multiple witnesses provide conflicting accounts. The author cites an example of a 'failed experience' involving a fireball bolide on December 4, 2005, as an instance where even 'experts' might struggle to provide clear data.

Personal Experiences and Community Dynamics

The author recounts an experience of joining the 'Allmystery.de' forum, a large German UFO community, and facing immediate hostility and deletion of posts. This experience is framed as an example of how UFO communities can react to perceived threats to their established beliefs. The author feels that while some users are genuinely interested in understanding, others are fanatical and resistant to new information, especially if it challenges their worldview.

The publication reflects on its own role and impact within the UFO community, noting that it is often perceived as a threat or an 'adversary.' The author questions the 'duty' of ufology, suggesting that simply invoking 'aliens' is insufficient. The article discusses how UFOlogy has become a complex phenomenon, with various factions and interests, and how the author's own research has been met with attempts to discredit or suppress it.

The 'Alien-UFO' Phenomenon and Psychological Needs

The article suggests that the 'Alien-UFO' phenomenon may serve to fulfill psychological and emotional needs, acting as a form of 'mental-spiritual needs satisfaction.' This leads to a situation where 'aliens' are perceived as having 'landed' in the minds of their earthly adherents. This psychological underpinning, the author argues, creates a problematic foundation for scientific investigation into sighting reports.

The author criticizes the tendency of UFO fans to act as 'lawyers' for witnesses, which is not objective. They also note that people tend to believe what they want to believe, leading to circular arguments. The article draws a parallel with the Jehovah's Witnesses, suggesting a similar pattern of belief reinforcement.

The 'CENAP' Perspective and Media Influence

The publication reflects on its own history and impact, noting that despite a relatively small readership for its printed version, its internet presence is more widely utilized. The author questions why CENAP and Werner Walter are so 'feared' within the UFO scene, suggesting it might be due to their critical stance and the potential to expose uncomfortable truths. The article posits that the perception of CENAP as an 'adversary' is likely due to the 'rumor mill' within ufology, rather than direct evidence.

Ufology as a 'Freestyle' Pursuit

The author concludes that ufology is often pursued as a 'freestyle' activity, lacking the rigorous methodology and systematic approach of genuine scientific research. The article implies that the UFO phenomenon has generated more 'mountains of trash' than genuine insights, and that the focus on fantasy has overshadowed the pursuit of objective truth. The author expresses a sense of disillusionment, feeling that the topic has become stale and that the 'reality' has broken their spirit, though not their resolve.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of ufology, the contrast between scientific methodology and belief systems, the psychological drivers behind UFO beliefs, and the challenges of conducting objective research in a field often dominated by speculation and emotional investment. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical and analytical, advocating for rigorous scientific standards and questioning the validity of many common ufological claims. The publication aims to provide a more grounded and rational perspective on the UFO phenomenon, challenging the prevailing narratives and encouraging critical thinking among its readers.

CENAP Newsflash Nr. 20, June 2006, is an issue that delves deeply into the critical analysis of ufology, questioning its methodologies, the motivations of its proponents, and the psychological underpinnings of belief in UFO phenomena. The publication adopts a strongly skeptical stance, arguing that the field has failed to deliver on its promises and is plagued by speculation, misinformation, and a resistance to critical examination.

Critique of Ufology and Skepticism

The author expresses dissatisfaction with the current state of ufology, describing it as a scene that prioritizes 'shockwaves' and sensationalism over factual evidence. The issue highlights a perceived lack of progress and significant gaps in UFO evidence, which remain unaddressed despite persistent claims. This leads to the conclusion that the popular UFO thesis is fundamentally flawed, contributing to a decline in public interest. The author notes a personal shift in their own views on UFOs and ufology, moving away from earlier beliefs.

The text criticizes the tendency within ufological forums to dismiss or reject skeptical viewpoints, often resorting to personal attacks rather than engaging with arguments. A specific online forum discussion is detailed, where a user's attempt to present a reasoned argument was met with hostility and misrepresentation. The author recounts an incident where their identity as Werner Walter of CENAP was questioned and denied by a forum moderator, leading to accusations of being an imposter and deliberate lying.

This experience is used to illustrate a broader problem within ufology: the deliberate distortion of facts and the creation of false narratives. The author argues that such practices prevent genuine UFO research from progressing and that many ufologists are not genuinely interested in pursuing objective research.

The Role of Forums and Online Communities

The issue scrutinizes the dynamics of online UFO forums, portraying them as environments where 'political correctness' and strict adherence to rules are often absent, and where entertainment takes precedence over factual accuracy. The author warns against individuals who attempt to manipulate these communities through 'hostile takeovers' or by presenting lies as fact, which can lead to the marginalization of critical research.

The text emphasizes that the problem is not just the existence of lies but their widespread acceptance due to a lack of skepticism, which shapes public perception and the views of UFO 'researchers.' The author likens ufology to a 'private world revolution' driven by the participants, often characterized by heated disputes and the quick dismissal of topics.

The 'Alien.de' Forum and the Rendlesham Case

Another example is drawn from the 'Alien.de' forum, where a debate about the Cable Eins UFO documentary and the Rendlesham case took place. The author suggested directing users to the CENAP UFO Newsticker for more details, but this was met with resistance, with one user complaining that long articles are uninteresting. This is contrasted with the need for detailed explanations to cover all facets of complex issues, underscoring the importance of reading and research.

The author criticizes the tendency of many ufologists to prefer superficial engagement and 'short formulas' over in-depth study, contrasting this with their own enjoyment of reading and research. The success of Hesemann's book 'Geheimsache U.F.O.' is cited as an example of how a pro-UFO narrative can be highly popular despite its length.

Internal Conflicts and 'Expert' Status

The issue highlights internal conflicts within the ufological community, where experts are sometimes unwelcome. The author recounts an email from a forum participant expressing disappointment that a prominent figure like Werner Walter was being driven away instead of being engaged with. This participant felt that the forum was more interested in confirming existing beliefs, possibly from sources like 'The X-Files,' rather than genuine learning.

The author notes that such behavior is not an isolated incident but a consistent experience over their decades of involvement with ufological organizations. They observe a pattern of dismissing inconvenient truths and resorting to conspiracy theories as a last refuge for the 'UFO-provisorio.'

The Nature of Belief and Skepticism

The text explores the nature of belief and skepticism, suggesting that many people are prone to deception and self-deception. The author posits that critical thinking is essential, and that true skeptics do not simply accept information but actively verify it. They contrast this with the tendency of many to rely on first impressions or 'old traditions.'

UFO Evidence and Misinterpretation

The issue addresses the impact of camcorders on UFO sightings, noting a dramatic increase in documented sightings. However, it questions the validity of many of these videos, citing a Freenet.de article that suggests a significant portion are easily identifiable as hoaxes. The author points out that even when videos are not obvious fakes, the claim that 15% of sightings remain unidentifiable does not automatically equate to extraterrestrial origins.

The author criticizes the selective use of evidence and the tendency to seek confirmation bias. They argue that the term 'UFO' (Unidentified Flying Object) is often misused to imply an extraterrestrial spacecraft, when in reality, it simply means an object that cannot be identified by the observer.

The 'Operation UFO-Phänomen-Erforschung'

The author suggests that many ufologists are not interested in participating in a genuine 'Operation UFO-Phänomen-Erforschung' because it would challenge their existing beliefs. The article touches upon the idea of a 'private world revolution' within ufology, where participants create their own reality detached from objective evidence.

The Fehrenbach Case and MUFON-CES

A significant portion of the text is dedicated to the Fehrenbach case, described as the 'Pearl Harbor' for MUFON-CES. The author criticizes MUFON-CES for its pro-UFO stance and its handling of the case, which they believe involved sensationalism and a failure to critically assess evidence. They argue that the case was directly influenced by a pro-UFO TV sensation and that the subsequent misinterpretations, particularly involving children's hoaxes, demonstrate a lack of rigorous scientific approach.

The author expresses a loss of respect for the scientists involved with MUFON-CES, viewing the organization as an 'ufological show party band.' They argue that such practices damage the credibility of UFO phenomenon research and that a lack of critical thinking and a reliance on 'wishful thinking' are prevalent.

The Psychology of Belief and 'Illusion of Consistency'

The text delves into the psychological aspects of belief, discussing the 'illusion of consistency' where individuals tend to seek out information that confirms their existing views. This is presented as a fundamental problem in ufology, where a desire for certainty leads to the acceptance of unverified claims.

The author contrasts the approach of skeptics, who verify information, with that of believers, who may accept it based on intuition or authority. They note that even experts in one field do not automatically qualify as experts in others, yet this is often assumed in ufology.

The 'Game' of Ufology vs. Research

The author distinguishes between the 'game' of ufology, which involves politics and diplomacy, and genuine research, which requires difficult decisions and a focus on objective facts. They argue that the field needs support in fundamental areas and that decisions must be made to move beyond speculation.

The Problem of 'Real UFOs'

The issue addresses the inherent problem of 'real UFOs,' stating that there is always a 'security problem' and that certainty is elusive. The author suggests that the best way to avoid deception is to understand how one can be deceived. In the context of UFOs, this involves using 'IFOs' (Identified Flying Objects) as a control instrument to explain reported phenomena.

Conclusion and Editorial Stance

CENAP Newsflash Nr. 20, June 2006, concludes by emphasizing the need for critical thinking, rigorous research, and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths within the field of ufology. The author advocates for a scientific approach that separates speculation from evidence and highlights the importance of understanding the psychological factors that influence belief. The overall stance is one of strong skepticism towards the prevailing narratives in ufology, urging for a more grounded and evidence-based investigation of unexplained aerial phenomena.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

Recurring themes in this issue include the critique of ufological methodologies, the prevalence of skepticism versus belief, the dynamics of online UFO communities, the psychological aspects of belief and confirmation bias, and the analysis of specific UFO cases. The editorial stance is clearly critical and skeptical, aiming to expose what the author perceives as flaws, misinformation, and a lack of scientific rigor within the ufology field. The publication advocates for a more rational, evidence-based approach to the study of unexplained phenomena.

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, dated June 2006, delves into the psychological underpinnings of belief systems, particularly within the context of UFO phenomena. The publication critically examines how individuals and groups within the UFO community engage with evidence, highlighting the pervasive influence of 'confirmation bias' and 'belief persistence'. The articles argue that a lack of rigorous scientific methodology and an overreliance on anecdotal evidence contribute to the perpetuation of unsubstantiated claims.

Confirmation Bias and Belief Persistence

The lead article, starting on page 41, introduces the concept of 'confirmation bias' (Bestätigungstendenz), defining it as the human tendency to hold onto a hypothesis, even if incorrect, by selectively seeking supporting evidence, biased perception, and rhetorical manipulation. This bias is presented as a form of selective thinking that affects both non-believers and hardcore UFO fans. The author contrasts 'good' investigations, which employ numerous safeguards against self-deception, with 'bad' ones that fail to exclude potential error sources. This scientific approach is contrasted with what the author describes as 'loose fishing' for correlations, where any perceived link is declared a 'hit'. Individuals entrenched in a particular position tend to ignore new information that challenges their views, overvaluing confirming evidence and downplaying or rejecting contradictory findings. The article posits that the UFO phenomenon itself remains unproven, and its explanation is therefore not satisfactorily resolved. The author notes that while the phenomenon is unproven, the community still engages in explaining it, attributing this to a 'human weakness'.

Page 42 continues this discussion by introducing 'belief persistence' (belief persistence). Once a person commits to a belief, it becomes difficult to dissuve them, even with strong counter-evidence. This persistence influences the evaluation and interpretation of evidence. Social psychology suggests people expose themselves to information that strengthens their beliefs, a phenomenon termed the 'consistency theory'. People shape their environment to ensure a de facto selectivity, surrounding themselves with like-minded individuals, which is observed in UFO forums. The cause of this bias is attributed not only to human psychology but also to the 'material' itself – the beliefs and evidence presented, which are often appealing.

Case Studies and Critiques

The issue then moves to specific cases and critiques of UFO research organizations. On page 42, a forum participant named Andreas Böhm shares his journey from a fervent believer in conspiracy theories to a more distanced, scientifically informed perspective, commending the articles for their research and information. He notes that many large myths can be debunked through scientific knowledge and personal research.

A significant portion of the magazine (pages 42-43) scrutinizes a report from the 'Magazin 2000' special issue 'UFOs and Crop Circles', specifically an article about alleged UFO sightings over Knittelfeld, Austria, on August 24, 2003. The author questions the authenticity of the photos, suggesting they resemble long-exposure shots of aircraft or astronomical objects. The article highlights how witnesses, seeking explanations, turned to a 'government-affiliated UFO organization in Germany' but were dismissed. Instead, they approached the 'Society for Parapsychology' and a Viennese expert. Ultimately, they contacted Argo-Verlag, which hired a specialist who, after digital image processing, concluded the objects were surrounded by plasma and had three side windows.

Pages 43-44 detail a user named 'AustrianUfo' on the AllMystery forum who sought information about the Knittelfeld sightings, claiming to have 'material' and that the photos were examined by German scientists and were not fakes. However, the author notes a shift in the narrative, where 'AustrianUfo' eventually admits to being the witness himself, calling this dishonest. The user's motivation is framed as a desire to prove that the world is not as politicians or the USA present it, and to prevent UFO phenomena from being dismissed as nonsensical or imaginary. The author points out that this user is not an innocent witness but a hardcore UFO fan, evidenced by his knowledge of the author.

Page 44 discusses the difficulty of convincing such individuals and the tendency to dismiss UFOs as Venus sightings or imagination. The author emphasizes that the goal is to prevent these phenomena from being labeled as meaningless, but this is often met with resistance.

Skepticism and Scientific Rigor

Pages 44-45 delve deeper into the nature of skepticism and scientific inquiry. The author argues that while external experts are valuable in decision-making, the core issue in UFOlogy is the 'belief persistence' and the selective use of evidence. The author expresses skepticism, stating that he cannot believe unconditionally, viewing this not as a deficit but as a form of mental balance. He notes that the UFO phenomenon is often presented within a framework that criticizes 'science' for not taking UFOs seriously, which he sees as a pseudoscientific approach.

On page 45, the author criticizes the lack of self-investigation and research in UFOlogy, stating that most participants are not interested in it. He stresses the importance of acting according to the best available knowledge to verify claims about UFOs, rather than spreading opinions. True research, he argues, is based on logical reasoning and experimental verification, using IFOs (Identified Flying Objects) as a control group. He criticizes MUFON-CES for not being interested in IFOs, leading them to be repeatedly deceived. He also points out that MUFON-CES fails to exclude deception and lies in its methods, despite claiming to work scientifically.

Page 46 continues the critique of MUFON-CES, accusing them of falling for ordinary IFOs and primitive deceptions. The author states that the organization's self-oriented approach, driven by personal beliefs, leads to a misjudgment in practical UFO investigation. He emphasizes that scientific work requires continuous exchange and learning, which MUFON-CES appears to refuse.

The Nature of UFO Claims

Pages 46-47 discuss the nature of extraordinary claims. The author states that while an extraordinary claim is not necessarily false, it requires thorough examination. He questions the motives of those making such claims and notes the low probability of a claim being true when thousands of 'spinners' make unconfirmed theories. He describes how those who feel misunderstood or rejected may resort to conspiracy theories when reality fails to provide the expected confirmation. This leads to concepts like multiple realities or parallel dimensions.

Pages 47-48 discuss the difficulty of scientific discoveries being made by outsiders and the skepticism that arises when UFOlogists present unusual claims. The author notes that the escape route for some is to claim that UFOs are not alien spacecraft but human time-traveling vessels from the future, or Nazi flying saucers. This shifting of hypotheses is deemed unproductive and avoids the core problem of insufficient evidence for UFOs, regardless of their hypothetical origin.

Page 48 presents a user's argument that MUFON-CES has recorded UFO sightings with their electronic equipment, which is countered by another user questioning MUFON-CES's credibility, especially regarding the alleged UFO sighting in Mexico in May 2004. The author notes that MUFON-CES did not comment on the subsequent logical explanation of this phenomenon, suggesting a lack of serious engagement with UFO sightings and a form of public deception.

UFO Photo Analysis and Deception

Pages 49-50 focus on the analysis of UFO photographs and the issue of fakes. The author recounts a debate in the AllMystery forum about the 'Greifswald' luminous spheres, where MUFON-CES sources claimed no scientific explanation had been found, despite the event being explained since 1994. When a CENAP article was referenced, users reacted negatively, preferring to discuss aliens. The author states that the Greifswald lights were likely new generation fighter jets, not alien spacecraft.

He then discusses the 'Ed Walters' UFO photos from Gulf Breeze, which he claims are publicly branded as fakes. He notes that even Dr. Bruce Macabee, who processed the photos, had to enhance them significantly because the original images barely showed the objects, only their energy emissions. This enhancement, the author argues, makes the photos appear as if they were double-exposed or otherwise manipulated. The author criticizes the tendency of some UFOlogists to quickly shift away from the uncomfortable topic of photo fakes to new, less informed discussions.

The Vatican and UFOs

Page 50 touches upon the belief that the Vatican may possess more knowledge about UFOs, with speculation that the Ark of the Covenant might be stored in its cellars and that it could have functioned as a radio transmitter. This is compared to the secrecy surrounding Area 51.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of belief systems, particularly within the UFO community. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, emphasizing the importance of scientific methodology, critical thinking, and evidence-based reasoning. The publication actively debunks pseudoscientific claims and highlights the psychological biases that can lead individuals to accept unsubstantiated theories. There is a strong emphasis on distinguishing between genuine scientific inquiry and what is perceived as self-serving or misinformed UFOlogy. The articles advocate for a rigorous approach to investigating phenomena, urging readers to be wary of anecdotal evidence, selective interpretation, and organizations that may not adhere to strict scientific standards. The magazine appears to position itself as a voice of reason against what it views as the uncritical acceptance of extraordinary claims within the UFO field.

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, dated June 2006, delves into the complex reasons behind government secrecy surrounding UFO phenomena and offers a critical perspective on the field of ufology itself. The content is primarily derived from a discussion forum and references various books and online sources, with a strong focus on German-language ufological discourse.

Reasons for UFO Secrecy

The magazine outlines nine potential reasons for governments to maintain secrecy about UFOs, drawing from Bryant & Helen Reeve's book 'Flying Saucer Pilgrimage'. These reasons include:

1. Fear: Governments are simply afraid of the truth.
2. Sovereignty Threat: UFOs and their implications pose a threat to the unrestricted sovereignty of earthly governments.
3. Superior Intelligence: UFOs represent an extraterrestrial superiority that limits human free will and destructive tendencies, with higher intelligences monitoring humanity.
4. Military Advantage: Suppressing UFO truth could lead governments to falsely believe UFOs are their own secret weapons, gaining a military edge.
5. World Domination: Governments might conceal the truth to buy time to reverse-engineer UFO technology and achieve world domination, potentially leading to space warfare.
6. Public Panic: Governments fear public reaction, recalling the panic caused by Orson Welles' 1938 radio broadcast.
7. Supraphysical Aspects: The non-physical, supraphysical nature of UFOs makes official acknowledgment difficult due to current scientific understanding.
8. Gradual Revelation: The truth is too transcendent for immediate public disclosure, so it is left to independent researchers, filmmakers, and authors to prepare the public for eventual official information.
9. Controlled Controversy: Governments deliberately keep the UFO topic controversial, encouraging and then denying information to manage public perception.

Further points suggest governments lack sufficient knowledge to make public statements and are researching in secret (Grund 10). It's also argued that revealing that extraterrestrials have solved economic problems would be bad economic policy for Earth, which is controlled by financial interests (Grund 11). Governments are also seen as passively hoping the UFOs will simply leave (Grund 12).

UFO Videos and Documentaries

The issue discusses the controversy surrounding a UFO video clip from the World Trade Center in New York (April 2000), which was used by the Sci/Fi Channel and convinced many UFO fans. A forum participant defends the video's authenticity, noting the channel's history of airing UFO documentaries. The article points out that the actress in the helicopter from the WTC video, Barbara Sicuranza, described her role in the promotional video in her biography.

'Akte X' and Personal UFO Experiences

The article touches upon the influence of the TV series 'Akte X' (The X-Files) in popularizing UFO and conspiracy themes, particularly during the 1990s mystery boom. The author shares a personal childhood experience of seeing a UFO, describing an oval, silent, disc-like object with yellow lights hovering over gardens. This experience led to a lasting impression that television can be misleading.

Critique of Ufology

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a critique of the ufology field. This critique stems from forum discussions initiated by the author on topics like 'shortcomings and problems in ufology'. Key criticisms include:

• Lack of Openness: Few people approach the subject with an open mind; individuals tend to align with either pro-UFO or skeptical factions.
• Commercialization: The phenomenon is commercialized, with some individuals merely rehashing old theories.
• Lack of Scientific Rigor: Ufology is described as stagnant and a 'circus of absurdities' that has not advanced its research.
• Difficulty of Proof: The lack of tangible proof makes it hard to convince skeptics, leading to polarized debates.
• Information Overload: The sheer volume of photos, videos, and testimonies online makes it difficult for individuals to discern truth, leading to either blind belief or skepticism.
• Theorist Fragmentation: The proliferation of theories leads to the formation of small, isolated groups, making unified progress difficult.
• Influence of Belief Systems: Worldviews and belief systems often prevent objective analysis, with some individuals unable to accept explanations that contradict their established ideas.
• Lack of Primary Sources: Many books lack sufficient source citations, making verification difficult.
• Misinterpretation of Data: Released government documents are often selectively interpreted by ufologists.
• Internal Conflicts: There is a constant rivalry and dispute among different UFO research groups.

Connection to Right-Wing Extremism

The magazine highlights a concerning trend where conspiracy theories, particularly those related to secret societies and UFOs, are intertwined with right-wing extremism and antisemitism in Germany. Authors like Jan van Helsing (Jan Udo Holey) are discussed for promoting theories that blame Jewish people for wars and global control, drawing parallels to the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion'. The article notes that books promoting such theories have become bestsellers in the esoteric book market, indicating a broader societal reach for these ideas.

Jan van Helsing's book 'Geheimgesellschaften' (Secret Societies) is described as a significant publication of right-wing extremism after 1945, leading to its seizure by authorities. The magazine also mentions other related books from the Ewert-Verlag, such as Bruno Sammer's 'Die geheime Verschwörung der Illuminaten' and R. von Wittenberg's 'Geheime UFO-Sache'.

Werner Walter and Critical UFO Research

Werner Walter is presented as a controversial figure within the German ufological community. He is known for his critical approach, often explaining sightings as conventional phenomena like weather balloons (MHB). While this makes him unpopular with many UFO enthusiasts who prefer to believe in extraterrestrial explanations, his work is acknowledged for its extensive documentation in the 'CENAP-Report', considered one of the most comprehensive UFO diaries in Germany. The article suggests that understanding Walter's perspective requires reading his entire body of work.

The 'UFO Casino' and the Nature of Belief

The magazine uses the metaphor of a 'UFO casino' to describe the chaotic and often irrational environment of ufological discussions. It criticizes the tendency for belief to override evidence and the resistance to critical inquiry. The author argues that 'feeling' or 'belief' should not dictate understanding in the post-Enlightenment era, especially when it leads to irrational behavior and flawed conclusions. The article emphasizes the importance of continuous questioning and distinguishing between verifiable reality and pure thought.

The Future of UFO Research

The issue concludes by calling for an independent, scientifically oriented, and open-minded European UFO research center funded by public means. It warns against skepticism towards skeptics and highlights the challenges in UFO research due to the entanglement of belief systems, commercial interests, and political agendas. The article suggests that the field needs to separate itself from irrational 'ufological feelings' and approach the phenomenon with critical analysis, much like separating state and church.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are government secrecy surrounding UFOs, the critical examination of ufological claims, the problematic intersection of ufology with right-wing extremism and conspiracy theories, and the call for a more scientific and objective approach to UFO research. The editorial stance is clearly critical of unsubstantiated claims within ufology and advocates for evidence-based investigation, while acknowledging the public's fascination with the topic.

Title: CENAP Newsflash
Issue: 20
Date: June 2006

This issue of CENAP Newsflash features an article critically examining the field of Ufology, its practitioners, and the broader discourse surrounding the UFO phenomenon. The author expresses a strong stance on the nature of Ufology, differentiating their own research methodology from what they perceive as common practices within the community.

Analysis of Ufology and the UFO Phenomenon

The article begins by characterizing Ufology as a 'playground' for self-proclaimed researchers, often amplified by sensationalist media coverage. The author notes the significant personal differences and 'unscientific' approaches prevalent in the field, which they believe contribute to a lack of a strict ethos for truth-finding. This, in turn, leads to a situation where 'lived belief' can dominate, creating an environment that the author finds 'desolate'.

The author recounts an experience with 'AllMystery', where their willingness to engage was met with what they describe as 'brutal' honesty and a lack of sugar-coating. This directness, while perhaps uncomfortable, is presented as a contrast to the often 'uncomplicated' nature of seeking truth.

The 'Holy War' and Personal Stance

A key point of clarification is the author's perspective on a perceived 'Holy War' within Ufology. The author explicitly states that for them, such a conflict does not exist. Their primary interest is the UFO phenomenon itself, explored within a broad framework and investigated intensively across multiple levels. They emphasize their commitment to practical reason, long-term thinking, and a personal moral code that rejects 'nonsense' and 'silliness'.

The author positions themselves as a 'preacher' of practical reason and an advocate for long-term thinking, willing to engage in discussions with those who approach the topic with open minds and intellectual rigor. They are prepared to 'step down a level' in discussions but will disengage if individuals feign ignorance or fail to engage meaningfully.

Truth-Seeking and Combating Misinformation

The author expresses frustration when 'nonsense' is spread about the UFO phenomenon, particularly when better information is readily available through research and expert consultation. They assert that their engagement stems from a desire for 'clarification' and 'truth-finding', driven by their own 'undoubted expertise' and competence.

However, they reiterate that they do not participate in a 'Holy War' with UFO believers, as this would involve constant presence at conferences and prolific online contributions, which is not their focus. Their aim is to 'clean up' the subject matter and pursue the truth.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this piece revolve around the nature of belief versus skepticism in Ufology, the influence of media, the importance of a rigorous research ethos, and the author's personal commitment to rational inquiry and truth-seeking. The editorial stance is one of critical analysis, advocating for a more scientific and less emotionally driven approach to the UFO phenomenon, while distinguishing personal research from community conflicts.