CENAP Newsflash - No 17

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP - NEWSFLASH
Issue: Nr. 17
Date: February 2006
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, a publication from Mannheim, Germany, focuses on UFO phenomena, media representation, and specific case analyses. It commemorates "30 JAHRE CENAP: 1976-2006". The cover highlights "Weitere UFOs aus dem Sommer 2005 - Medienwirklichkeit und UFOs - Der Fall Zamora und das FBI", alongside an image of a building resembling the US Capitol, possibly alluding to government involvement or secrecy.

Impressum and CENAP's Mission

The "Impressum" identifies Werner Walter as the publisher and editor, based in Mannheim. The contact email is [email protected], and a hotline number is provided. The website is http://www.alien.de/cenap/onlinecr.htm. The Lektorat is handled by Jens Lorek.

CENAP, the "Centrale Erforschungsnetz Außergewöhnlicher Himmelsphänomene" (Central Research Network for Extraordinary Aerial Phenomena), is described as a private, non-commercial, and ideologically independent organization established in 1976. Its mission is to receive, analyze, and evaluate reports of alleged unidentified flying objects (UFOs) with a critical perspective. CENAP is associated with the GWUP (Society for the Scientific Investigation of the Paranormal) and the Society for Anomalistics. The organization collaborates with national and international institutions, exchanges information, and maintains a comprehensive UFO video archive. Its objectives include public education and demystification of the UFO topic through various media channels (TV, radio, press, internet) and scientific institutions like universities and planetariums, via lectures and public discussions.

Articles and Case Studies

Google Earth vs. NASA World Wind

An article discusses a report from July 23, 2005, concerning Google Earth and NASA World Wind. These programs, which provide detailed views of Earth from space, have reportedly led to the sighting of numerous UFOs. The article notes that even sensitive locations like Area 51 are listed under "Sightseeing" without any visible censorship. It raises questions about potential data manipulation and "corrections" made to the datasets, noting that the Capitol and White House were "processed". The article mentions that both programs are freeware and require significant system resources, including RAM and a good graphics card, as well as a fast internet connection.

Strasbourg Sighting (July 16, 2005)

A report from Nils Kloth details a sighting on July 16, 2005, around 02:30 AM, by himself and his wife from their balcony in Strasbourg. They observed a suddenly appearing, very bright light in the constellation Cygnus that outshone the stars. The light gradually dimmed and disappeared. The witness initially considered calling the police but decided against it. Silvia Kowollik suggests this could be an "Iridium-Flare", noting that misjudging satellite speed is common and that the description fits.

BaWü Sighting (July 20, 2005)

An email from Thomas B. describes a sighting on July 20, 2005, around 2:10 AM MESZ, near Lauda-Königshofen, Baden-Württemberg. He and a friend observed an extremely bright light point, possibly appearing as three points very close together. The light seemed to hover, then moved slightly, oscillating for about five minutes before disappearing. It reappeared later, fainter and further away, then reappeared again, bright and close, oscillating. After about 15 minutes, it vanished completely. The witness could not photograph it and found a field telescope unhelpful. He speculates it could be a satellite, rocket launch, or something similar. The weather was cloudy, with few visible stars. The witness was a 22-year-old student.

Exeter Sighting (July 27, 2005)

A report from the 'Exeter News-Letter' in New Hampshire, USA, describes a sighting on July 20, 2005, at 3:15 PM. A former US Navy flight engineer with 10,000 flight hours reported seeing a massive, cigar-shaped object hovering in his backyard. Described as enormous, possibly as large as two aircraft carriers, it had window-like features. The object moved slowly from west to east, then changed color to orange-red, surrounded by "flames" without smoke, and then stretched like a rubber band to twice its original length. The entire event lasted about 10 minutes. The witness searched online and reported the sighting to the National Reporting Center (NUFORC).

The article notes that Exeter has a history of UFO sightings, referencing the 1965 "Incident at Exeter" and the Barney and Betty Hill abduction case. The Exeter Police Department and the Federal Aviation Administration reported no unusual radar activity. Peter Davenport of NUFORC confirmed the report but could not speak with the witness directly. The witness's claimed military background led to the case being considered "serious and credible" by some, which the author views as naive.

Unidentified Satellite (July 27, 2005)

Amateur astronomer Dipl. Physiker Martin Wagner reported an observation on July 27, 2005, around 11:17 PM. He saw a bright object (1 to 0 magnitude) moving at a speed similar to the ISS, flying a similar path. He ruled out the ISS and Shuttle as they were not visible. The object did not blink and was not an Iridium satellite. He observed it for about a minute. His attempt to photograph it failed due to the lens cap. The object was slower than an aircraft and did not blink. It was brighter than any satellite except the ISS and Shuttle. Later, the report was clarified as a "Lacrosse 5 rocket stage" (USSPACECOM Nr 28647, 2005-016B), with a maximum magnitude of 1.7.

Discussion on UFOlogy and Media

Several sections discuss the nature of UFO research and media influence. The author critiques the tendency in ufology to dismiss simple explanations and to rely on the credibility of witnesses rather than rigorous evidence. The case of Gordon Cooper is mentioned, with the author refuting claims about suppressed landing photos, stating the case is officially recorded and shows a weather balloon ascent, not a landing.

A segment titled "Medienwirklichkeit und der geförderte UFO-Aberglaube" (Media Reality and Promoted UFO Superstition) discusses the ZDF television program "Ungelöste Phänomene: Das UFO-Rätsel" (Unsolved Phenomena: The UFO Riddle). The author expresses a personal bias towards UFO history and its "classics". The article criticizes how media outlets may prioritize sensationalism and marketability over factual accuracy when reporting on UFOs. It suggests that the media's portrayal of UFOs can contribute to a form of superstition. The author also references a US Congress study from 1976 concerning Dr. J. Allen Hynek, suggesting that Hynek, an astronomer who worked for the US Air Force, was tasked with disproving UFOs and discrediting the phenomenon.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue consistently highlights the intersection of UFO sightings, media coverage, and the scientific or skeptical approach to these phenomena. The editorial stance appears critical of sensationalism and unverified claims, while also acknowledging the persistent public interest in UFOs. There's an emphasis on detailed case analysis and a cautious approach to witness testimony, balanced with an exploration of how media shapes perceptions. The magazine champions a critical yet open-minded investigation into aerial phenomena, as exemplified by CENAP's own mission statement.

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, dated February 2006, delves into the history and investigation of UFO phenomena, with a particular focus on early sightings, government projects, and key figures in ufology. The magazine presents a critical examination of official narratives and explores alternative interpretations of events.

The Birth of the Flying Saucer

The article posits that the genesis of the 'flying saucer' concept can be traced to New Mexico, specifically around the military bases of Holloman and Los Alamos, during the Second World War. It references the physicist Enrico Fermi and his famous paradox: "They are there, but where are they?" Fermi's conviction is that technologically advanced civilizations have contacted Earth, but their presence remains unacknowledged. However, the text disputes that 'contacts with UFOs and little grey men' caused widespread sensation at that time, suggesting that the 'little greys' are a product of later decades. It highlights the historical fact of USAF High Altitude Research Balloon Operations in 1947, led by the Air Force Cambridge Research Lab (AFRL) and the Space Vehicle Directorate at Kirtland AFB, New Mexico, noting that the Roswell-MOGUL balloon also originated from Holloman.

German Secret Weapon?

It is suggested that Hitler's scientists planned a flying saucer. Even after World War II, pilots reported sightings of strange luminous discs. Initially, US Air Force generals suspected a German military secret weapon. However, interrogations of German scientists revealed that while building a flying saucer was intended, it was not successful.

Kenneth Arnold - Independent Research

In the winter of 1946, the US Air Force Intelligence at Wright Field received a report about a sighted UFO. Intelligence Commander Howard McCoy and two officers were tasked with investigating. The 'Kenneth Arnold case' gained national attention, with news spreading globally and causing great excitement. Kenneth Arnold, a civilian pilot, reported in 1947 seeing nine silvery, luminous discs during a flight over Washington State, moving at tremendous speed. The press coined the term 'flying saucer,' which became internationally recognized. Following this event, an engineer at Wright-Field, Alfred Loedding, initiated Project 'Sign,' described as the most independent research into the UFO phenomenon to date. Loedding was also sent to Roswell after reports of a crashed UFO.

The Roswell Incident and Project Sign

The text critically examines the Roswell incident, suggesting that the claim of a crashed UFO and subsequent investigation by Loedding is 'absolute nonsense' (ZDF). It argues that Project Sign was officially ordered by Lt. Gen. Nathan F. Twining and initiated in January 1948, long after the Roswell incident in July 1947. The article dismisses the idea that Loedding was in Roswell and simultaneously ordered not to report it, calling it contradictory.

The Kenneth Arnold Case Re-examined

Further analysis of the Kenneth Arnold case is presented, questioning the official narrative. It is stated that Arnold's testimony to Special Agents differed significantly from his later published account in his 1952 book, 'The Coming of the Flying Saucers.' His speed calculations are described as flawed, and a sketch he made depicts a triangular object with rounded edges, resembling a classified US Air Force secret weapon project from the Cold War. The article recounts an attempt to retrace Arnold's flight path, noting that a pilot, Rich Mueller, believed in UFOs but had not personally encountered alien spacecraft. Despite favorable weather conditions, the retracing flight did not yield any UFO sightings, leading to skepticism about Arnold's claims regarding objects seen 20 miles away at supersonic speeds.

The Socorro Incident

The article details the Lonnie Zamora incident in 1964. Sheriff Lonnie Zamora of Socorro, New Mexico, reported seeing a landed craft and two small beings. The incident gained significant media attention. However, the text suggests that Zamora's account was not initially taken seriously by his superiors, and his career was abruptly ended. It also clarifies that Zamora was a patrol officer, not a sheriff, and that the term 'Sheriff' is often misused for elected officials in counties, distinct from appointed City Marshals. The case was officially listed as 'still unsolved' by the USAF twenty months later. The article also critiques the assertion that the case was ignored because it was 'too well documented,' suggesting instead that a lack of a passable explanation led to a 'political' statement by Blue Book Chief Major Hector Quintanilla, who believed the object might have been a prototype Apollo lunar lander.

Alan Hynek and Project Blue Book

The role of astronomer Dr. Alan Hynek is discussed. Initially appointed as a scientific-astronomical consultant for Project Grudge, which aimed to discredit UFO sightings, Hynek later developed doubts about his mission. The article disputes that Hynek was officially a spokesman for Grudge, stating he was a consultant. It also refutes the notion that Hynek fell into 'disgrace,' noting he continued to be involved with USAF UFO projects until the mid-1960s. The establishment of Project Blue Book in 1952 is described as an effort to convince the public that UFOs do not exist, with Hynek tasked with publicly ridiculing eyewitness accounts. However, Hynek eventually experienced significant doubts and recommended the formation of a scientific commission to analyze the Blue Book archives rather than dismiss individual cases. The article also addresses the Condon Report, a study commissioned by the Air Force, noting that its preliminary findings were leaked, suggesting a predetermined conclusion that UFOs do not exist. Despite over 10,000 cases reviewed, more than 600 remained unexplained (the X-files). Hynek was excluded from the commission.

Hynek's Typology and CUFOS

Disillusioned, Hynek founded the organization CUFOS (Center for UFO Studies) and developed a classification system for UFO phenomena, including 'Close Encounters of the First, Second, and Third Kind.' The article explains that these categories were intended to classify sightings based on proximity and physical evidence, with CE III involving encounters with beings, medical examinations, or abductions. It notes that Hynek did not live to see the addition of CE IV and V classes, which were added later. The text also critiques the way UFO enthusiasts eagerly embraced fantastical accounts, often without critical evaluation, leading to the accumulation of 'evidence' based on reports from 'phantasts and religious fanatics.'

Later Developments and Criticisms

The article touches upon the aftermath of the Condon study, which led to the discontinuation of Project Blue Book. It mentions that the Condon Report was unanimously approved by a committee of the National Academy of Sciences, a fact often overlooked. The text also highlights the re-examination of 'genuine UFO cases' by CUFOS, which found that many officially unexplained cases had mundane explanations, thus reducing the number of truly unexplained cases.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine adopts a critical stance towards official explanations of UFO phenomena, often questioning the motives and conclusions of government investigations. It emphasizes the importance of independent research and highlights discrepancies between official reports and eyewitness testimonies. The editorial stance appears to favor a more open-minded approach to the UFO question, while also cautioning against unsubstantiated claims and sensationalism. The recurring themes include the history of UFO investigations, the role of key individuals like Alan Hynek, the impact of government secrecy, and the ongoing debate about the nature of unidentified aerial phenomena.

CENAP Newsflash Nr. 10, published in February 2006, is a German-language magazine focusing on UFO phenomena, historical incidents, and alleged government cover-ups. The issue delves into specific cases, media coverage, and the challenges faced by researchers in obtaining verifiable information.

Landung im Lavendelfeld - Ufo Sighting in Southern France

This section details a UFO sighting that occurred in Valensole, Southern France, around the same time as the Socorro incident in America. Maurice Masse, a 20-year-old owner of a lavender plantation, reported seeing an unknown object land in his field. He described the UFO to the local police as being similar in shape to a car model of that time, with the official sketch resembling that of the Socorro UFO. According to Masse, the extraterrestrials temporarily paralyzed him, presumably to ensure their escape. The town of Valensole has since become a tourist attraction for UFO enthusiasts.

The deputy mayor, Maurice Chaspoul, confirmed the significant impact of the event, noting that people regularly visit to see the landing site and inquire about the grass's regrowth. He stated that while visitors come from all over the world, the municipality has not actively promoted the UFO aspect, as the area is already considered beautiful.

A note clarifies that Masse was the sole witness and that the incident occurred on July 1, 1965, over a year after the Socorro event.

Was UFOs Forced to Land by Radar Systems?

This article explores the possibility that UFOs might be forced to land due to radar interference. It notes the proximity of radar installations to the Valensole landing site. Ufologists suggest that the strong microwave fields generated by radar could interfere with the navigation of flying saucers, potentially weakening the object and forcing it to land. This theory is also drawn as a parallel to the Roswell incident, with some scientists positing that military radar interference contributed to the crash.

The "Roswell Riddle" - UFO or Weather Balloon?

The issue revisits the famous Roswell incident of 1947. It mentions Jesse Marcel, whose name became prominent when the Air Force announced that Marcel had investigated a crashed UFO near Roswell, New Mexico. However, General Ramey later held a press conference where Marcel identified the object as a weather balloon, which he had mistakenly believed to be a spaceship.

A note points out that this account is exaggerated, as the "Roswell Daily Record" and other local papers had limited regional circulation. While some European newspapers mentioned Roswell, Marcel's name did not appear until the 1980s, coinciding with a new dimension and increased fantasy surrounding the original story.

Extraterrestrial Bodies

Glenn Davies, a Roswell resident, reported observing what appeared to be the wreckage of a flying saucer being secretly transported to a hangar, along with four small boxes. His girlfriend, a nurse at the military base, allegedly provided him with drawings of a strange corpse after witnessing an autopsy. Davies then reconstructed these images for the press. The article states that the military recovered not only the UFO but also four extraterrestrial bodies.

General Twining, then chief of military intelligence, is quoted as stating in 1947 that "Flying saucers are not military experiments. Witnesses have seen something, but we don't know what it is." He did not mention a weather balloon. His memorandum to the Pentagon, revealed through the Freedom of Information Act, reportedly stated: "The phenomenon is real, it is not hallucination or imagination."

Notes dispute Davies' claims, stating that he never made such assertions himself. Furthermore, it is claimed that the US press never reported on the recovery of bodies and that the drawings were made decades later by a mortician named Glenn Dennis, based on a nurse's recollection. This nurse is said to not exist, and Dennis is labeled a "Roswell charlatan."

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)

The FOIA is explained as a law granting US citizens the right to access US government documents. While enacted in 1967, its effectiveness was limited until a 1974 amendment. However, not all documents are accessible, with restrictions on classified materials, privacy-related information, and bank or oil investigations.

New Versions of the Roswell Incident

This section discusses new explanations for the Roswell event, including a report that describes the crashed object as a spy balloon and the extraterrestrials as human-like dummies. Wayne Mattson, a former pilot and aircraft engineer, disputes this, stating that dummies were not used by the Air Force until 1953, long after the 1947 incident. He also heard that the UFO resembled a boomerang.

Another note dismisses Mattson's involvement as that of a sensationalist who plays a role in the "fantastic new version" of the Roswell story.

Death Threats and Government Secrecy

UFO historian Dennis Balthaser recounts his experience in 1997 when he was prevented by two US Air Force agents from meeting a former military policeman in Oklahoma who claimed to have a mysterious piece of metal from Roswell. Balthaser believes the truth is still being suppressed, despite numerous witnesses to the crashed UFO. He asserts that many witnesses were threatened with death if they remained silent, which would not be the case for a weather balloon or test dummies.

Ufologists find the FOIA unhelpful in the Roswell case, citing loopholes and a feeling of being misled. They argue that witness testimonies alone are insufficient and that documents are needed but inaccessible.

A note criticizes Balthaser as a "freeloader" and "chatterbox" contributing to the "fantastic Roswell version" and turning it into a thriller.

Conspiracy Against the Population: Is the US Government Negotiating with Extraterrestrials?

The Senate revisited the UFO phenomenon in 1990. Under the auspices of the GAO, Senator Steven Schiff initiated a committee to investigate the Roswell affair. However, the Air Force archives were reportedly missing. Schiff was directed through the Defense Department to an agency where the documents were also absent. The Air Force subsequently released a new report on Roswell, declaring the "Case closed."

A note clarifies that Senator Schiff, prompted by ufologists and media attention to the "Roswell home case," made inquiries that led to the reopening of the Roswell file by the Secretary of the Air Force. This resulted in the "Case closed" conclusion, which is presented as less dramatic than the "conspiracy against the population" narrative.

Extraterrestrial Technology

There is speculation that technologies from extraterrestrials are already being used on Earth. Senator Barry Goldwater inquired if the Roswell extraterrestrials were stored at Wright Field. General Ramey, who allegedly staged the weather balloon story, reacted with extreme anger when questioned by Goldwater about this.

Astronauts also criticize alleged government cover-ups. Edgar Mitchell believes that advanced technologies have been developed following the seizure of a UFO and negotiations with extraterrestrials. He suggests that many current UFO sightings might involve people secretly using these extraterrestrial technologies.

A note clarifies that the "Hangar 18" legend, often associated with Wright-Patterson, is unrelated to Roswell and concerns a supposed storage site for UFO debris.

The "UFO Hangar 18" and Donald Keyhoe

The "UFO Hangar 18" is described as the trophy hall of the US Air Force intelligence, housing top-secret materials, including Soviet aircraft wreckage and reconnaissance photos. This material is now publicly accessible.

Donald Keyhoe, a prominent ufologist, reportedly had access to Generalmajor Roger Ramey in the early 1950s. Keyhoe claimed that Ramey issued a directive to intercept unidentified flying objects near sensitive installations but not to shoot unless they were confirmed as hostile.

Keyhoe also allegedly obtained early USAF saucer documents from General Samford, head of USAF intelligence. Albert Chop, a Pentagon press officer, was the executive agent.

Colonel Harold E. Watson, chief of intelligence in Dayton, dismissed claims of flying saucer crashes with wreckage and alien bodies as "nonsense."

Background on Air Force Intelligence Directives

A memo from Brig.Gen. William M. Garland in 1952 expressed frustration over years of UFO research yielding contradictory and inconclusive information. Garland urged for more action to determine the nature and origin of aerial phenomena. It is suggested that Garland himself had seen an unidentified flying object over Sacramento, California.

UFOs and "Telepathy" Experiments

This section discusses the possibility of extraterrestrial contact and mentions former astronaut Mitchell's alleged "telepathy" experiments from the Moon. The article suggests that such claims, often amplified by tabloid press, are not directly related to UFO experiences but rather based on conversations with former military personnel and ufologists like Wendell Stevens and Steven Greer.

Jen Zeidmann and Alan Hynek

Jen Zeidmann, an employee and confidante of astronomer Alan Hynek, criticizes US government policy regarding UFO knowledge, suggesting a conspiracy to withhold information from the public. She posits that the government might be hiding its own lack of knowledge or treating the public as not ready for the truth.

CUFOS and the UFO Community

Zeidmann was a co-founder of CUFOS, an organization formed as an alternative to existing UFO groups like APRO, NICAP, and MUFON. The article notes that Zeidmann's philosophy was influenced by Donald Keyhoe.

The Blue Book Archive and Richard Hall

The Blue Book Archive is being supplemented with UFO sighting reports. Richard Hall manages Hynek's archive and that of his former adversary and later friend, Major Keyhoe. Hall shares Keyhoe's suspicion that the CIA is behind the secrecy surrounding UFOs and believes in the existence of extraterrestrial beings on Earth, suggesting they might come from parallel universes or be time travelers.

Criticism of UFO Research and Media Portrayal

Uli Thieme's critical overview of the Roswell myth is mentioned, with the article asserting that his work has effectively dismantled the myth. The author criticizes the tendency of some in the UFO community to live in a "system of belief" that rejects logical arguments. The article also quotes online comments expressing skepticism about media portrayals of UFOs, particularly regarding Roswell.

ZDF Documentary and Media Bias

This section critiques a ZDF documentary about UFOs, "Wunderbare Welt" (Wonderful World). The author finds the documentary's premise and initial ZDF text suspicious, questioning whether it presents factual history or ufological speculation. The article argues that while the documentary might be entertaining for the general public, it fails to provide a nuanced or scientifically accurate account, thereby perpetuating the UFO myth.

It criticizes the ZDF's approach, suggesting it relies on poorly informed sources rather than consulting experts. The author contends that the documentary was more of an "ufological entertainment show" than a scientific documentation, similar to a previous ARD program.

The article concludes by noting that many editors in public broadcasting are themselves esoteric or UFO believers, projecting their own beliefs into their work.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently questions official explanations for UFO phenomena, highlighting inconsistencies and alleged government cover-ups. There is a strong emphasis on critical analysis of media reports and documentaries, with a particular focus on debunking sensationalized accounts, especially concerning the Roswell incident. The editorial stance appears to be one of skepticism towards official narratives and a pursuit of verifiable evidence, while acknowledging the complexity and persistent mystery surrounding UFOs. The magazine also touches upon the role of ufological organizations and the challenges of separating fact from fiction in this field.

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, dated February 2006, critically examines recent UFO-related documentaries, focusing on a ZDF production and its journalistic approach. The publication expresses strong skepticism towards the sensationalist and dramatized presentation of UFO phenomena in mass media, arguing that 'journalistic viewpoints' often overshadow factual accuracy and scientific rigor.

Critique of Media and Journalism

The article begins by criticizing the tendency of media outlets, exemplified by BILD newspaper, to prioritize 'dramatics' over 'journalistic viewpoints' and scientific accuracy. It quotes Dr. Günter Struve, former ARD Program Director, who admitted that UFO shows might not come to fruition if they were strictly based on scientific discussions. Struve also noted that television must compete in the media landscape, implying that sensationalism is a tool for audience retention. The author agrees, stating that documentaries often have little to do with scientific journalism and that producers may not be capable of critically assessing their own content, sometimes mistaking personal interests for genuine news value.

ZDF UFO Documentary Analysis

The author expresses disappointment with a ZDF documentary, which was produced by France 2. The documentary's style is described as 'French-like,' characterized by a leisurely, almost sleep-inducing approach to presenting information. Despite acknowledging the film's 'honesty' and 'information density' in its program guide, the author found it lacking, awarding it a 'mangelhaft' (deficient) grade under the German school grading system. The documentary is compared unfavorably to a previous ARD program, 'UFOs: Und es gibt sie doch' (1994), noting similar parallels in how both productions ignored critical perspectives to present fantastical narratives, lacking balance between pro and contra arguments.

J. Allen Hynek and Misrepresentations

A significant portion of the analysis focuses on J. Allen Hynek, a key figure in UFO research. The documentary presents him as a 'secret advisor' to Steven Spielberg's 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind,' which the author disputes. The article clarifies that Hynek was not a secret advisor but was used by the studio for public relations. It also corrects the claim that Hynek died in 1968 with his secrets intact, stating he died in 1986 and published extensively. The author further refutes the idea that Hynek was involved in 'contact' cases, asserting he actively avoided that aspect of the phenomenon.

The Roswell Incident

The Roswell incident is dissected, with the article questioning the narrative presented in the documentary. It criticizes the claim that Walter Haut, the Roswell spokesperson, saw alien bodies, stating Haut never claimed to have seen 'flying saucer' material or bodies. The article suggests that the 'alien' stories emerged decades after the 1947 event, possibly due to the introduction of 'dummies' for testing purposes and the 'fog of time' distorting memories. The official explanation of a repurposed high-altitude research balloon for military espionage is presented as the more plausible scenario.

Other Cases and Criticisms

The Socorro-Zamora case is also examined, with the author noting the lack of visual evidence and the reliance on anecdotal accounts. The documentary's portrayal of Colonel McCoy is criticized as inaccurate, particularly regarding his alleged dismissal for publicly stating UFOs were alien spacecraft. The article clarifies that McCoy's plane crash was likely due to oxygen deprivation after exceeding his aircraft's altitude limits while pursuing a Navy skyhook balloon, not a mysterious event.

Media Manipulation and UFOlogy

The author expresses concern about the ZDF's reliance on France 2's research, labeling the documentary as a 'manipulative' attempt to create 'documentary evidence' for the Roswell case. The article points out that many UFO claims, including the Majestic-12 document, have been debunked as fabrications. It highlights that many alleged UFO sightings in the southwestern USA occurred in areas with significant military and rocket testing activities, suggesting conventional explanations like balloons and experimental aircraft.

The Nature of UFO Evidence

The issue emphasizes the lack of physical evidence for unidentified sightings. It quotes McCoy stating that 'flying saucers are not military experiments' but also that 'witnesses have seen something. We don't know what it is.' The article stresses that 'strangeness' does not guarantee a real event and that the authenticity of UFO photos is 'vanishingly small.' It suggests that the UFO phenomenon could have been explained much earlier if the subject had been approached with more critical analysis.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout this issue is a strong critique of how UFO phenomena are presented in popular media, particularly in documentaries. The editorial stance is one of skepticism towards sensationalized UFO narratives and a call for more rigorous journalistic and scientific standards. The publication advocates for critical examination of evidence, questioning official narratives, and distinguishing between entertainment and factual reporting. It implies that the media often perpetuates myths for commercial gain, hindering a genuine understanding of unexplained aerial phenomena. The author believes that many UFO reports are simply misperceptions and that the 'UFO-problem' lies in the inability to definitively confirm these reports as genuine unusual observations.

CENAP Newsflash Nr. 10, published in February 2006, is a German-language publication from CENAP, focusing on UFO research and media criticism. The issue delves into various aspects of the UFO phenomenon, critically analyzing media portrayals, historical claims, and the motivations of researchers and enthusiasts.

Analysis of UFO Claims and Media Coverage

The article begins by dissecting claims attributed to Professor Oberth, who allegedly stated that UFOs were propelled by converting gravity into energy. The author dismisses this as an exaggerated representation and a distraction, asserting that Oberth never truly researched UFOs in the conventional sense and that the press conference was part of an esoteric UFOlogy conference. Oberth's later-life UFO views are described as ideologically motivated.

Further scrutiny is applied to a report in the Italian magazine "Epoca" (November 12, 1967) that cited Oberth. The report claimed that thousands of UFO photos and film recordings were being examined in an underground silo of the Strategic Air Command in Omaha, Nebraska, with secret discussions and confidential reports from scientists never made public. This information was allegedly corroborated by a source within a high-ranking US government agency, suggesting that even Project Blue Book personnel and the Condon Committee lacked access to these sources. The author vehemently disputes this, calling it "nonsense" and questioning the logistics of storing such materials in a missile silo.

The article also debunks claims about Albert Chop being the "Deputy Press Chief of NASA" who informed Keyhoe about the "interplanetary origin of flying saucers," leading NASA to believe they were being "monitored by beings from space." The author points out that NASA and its predecessor organization did not exist when Chop and Keyhoe were supposedly interacting. Similarly, a claim that the "Press Department of the US Air Force" broadcast a TV documentary on February 21-22, 1960, declaring flying saucers real and occupied by intelligent extraterrestrial beings, is labeled a lie. This alleged documentary is noted as a significant argument for Adolf Schneider in his 1973 book "Besucher aus dem All" (Visitors from Space).

The text then shifts to Hynek's collaborator, Zeidmann from Colorado, who reportedly believed the US Air Force was involved in a UFO conspiracy, a view that Hynek himself did not share. Zeidmann is quoted suggesting that powerful figures might be as clueless about UFOs as everyone else, a sentiment echoed by Jenny Randles' earlier description of "darkness at the top."

Richard Hall's involvement with the National Archives and the Blue Book material is discussed. Hall, described as having become a mocker and doubter, suggests that the complexity of the UFO topic makes it difficult to handle. He admits to not knowing the origin of UFOs and no longer wishing to speculate. Hall reflects on the financial toll of UFO research, stating it has "paid off not at all" for him personally. He presents a "UFO artifact" from the Blue Book archive – a thick, spiral-shaped screw of black coloration, and a larger tubular part. The article notes that various "parts/artifacts" attributed to UFOs are still housed in the Blue Book archive, representing a wealth of evidence, but acknowledges significant gaps in serious UFO research.

The ZDF UFO documentary from the German summer of 2005 is criticized for harkening back to an era of UFOlogy characterized by naivety and mystification.

Media and UFOlogy

The issue extensively critiques the role of media in shaping public perception of UFOs. It contrasts the "sensory" nature of television with the more "rational" medium of print. Television's ability to convey complex issues through multiple senses is acknowledged, but the article argues that this potential is often misused, citing a France2 broadcast as an example of failing to uphold truth. The mass appeal of TV is highlighted, along with the responsibility of public broadcasters (like ZDF) to inform and educate. Commercial television, driven by profit, is seen as having no such societal obligation.

Pro7's motto "We love to entertain you" is presented as an example of a broadcaster explicitly rejecting public responsibility. The author assigns a "school grade of 5" to the ZDF's portrayal, deeming it an unrealistic "world experience" that fails to foster understanding of complex issues like extraterrestrial visitation. Scientific questions, it is argued, require critical examination, not a mere collection of anecdotes.

The definition of a "documentary" is explored, with legal expert RA Jens Lorek emphasizing that a "document" is akin to a "deed" or "charter" and requires a clear issuer. He distinguishes this from a "documentation" (a collection of documents), expecting all presented documents to have an unambiguous issuer. The article criticizes the ZDF program for not even meeting the basic standard of clarity.

André Knöfel expresses skepticism towards certain media personalities and their programs, particularly those he believes are not well-researched or are intentionally misleading. Alfred Danzer suggests that many journalists work with pre-determined scripts, leading to nonsensical reports based on prior assumptions and information gathering.

The Nature of UFOlogy and Skepticism

The publication criticizes the state of UFO research, describing it as a "construction site full of bunglers" who consider themselves "skilled workers." The ufological "Funkydown" is characterized not as research but as "blind flight" lacking "crisis management." It is seen as a show designed to strengthen belief, akin to religious faith, where "encountering Christ" or celestial beings is dependent on lived faith. This is contrasted with the UFO research seminars in Cröffelbach, which are reportedly attended by the remaining UFO community for belief reinforcement.

The UFO days in Cröffelbach are described as "show parties" for the "UFO opposition" seeking self-celebration, rather than genuine attempts at bridging gaps within the UFOlogy scene. The author believes that many ufologists avoid confronting the reality of UFO phenomena, particularly the overwhelming evidence of unidentified flying objects (IFOs). Critical alternatives to established "broadband" ufology are largely ignored, and a "skeptical project" faces a long road ahead.

The article posits that sometimes it is better not to know the truth, drawing a parallel to "gods" who fare well. It mentions the large gatherings of Catholic Christians for World Youth Day as an example of people seeking a sense of belonging and faith reinforcement.

The UFO Phenomenon and Belief Systems

The issue delves into the psychological and belief-driven aspects of UFO interest. It suggests that people seek a "depth of life" beyond the superficiality of their daily existence, and some turn to ufology for this. However, the author argues that ufology often lacks this depth, devolving into commercially driven "pilgrimages" where individuals seek refuge in a "virtual parallel universe" of UFOs and aliens. This is linked to "ufological monument care."

UFOs and psychology are presented as sensitive topics. The article criticizes ufologists for not taking themselves seriously and for lacking a sense of responsibility towards the theses they present, including critical self-examination. Skeptical UFO research is framed as a "control organ" for the "spoiled ufological meat," ensuring quality control. The author acknowledges that this can cause turbulence but believes that knowledgeable critics and skeptics should engage, as the "reality check" of exotic UFO incidents is difficult.

Ufological "heresies" are seen as relying on animations and driven by "gurus" who turn themselves into events. This is termed the "ufological tradition preservation business," which shapes the ufological concept of reality and creates an "experience offer" – a grand event staged for people by people.

The ZDF sendung is again criticized for its lack of "high competence," blurring the lines between fantasy and reality and promoting mythology, as advocated by some UFO authors like Luc Bürgin, who suggest more fantasy is needed to make the world more realistic. The article contrasts this with the "skeptical project" which requires a long journey and aims for something "special," even a "UFOlogen-Schreck" (UFOlogist's fright).

The Business of UFOs and Media

The article touches upon the commercial aspects of UFO interest, referencing publications like "Mysteries" and its success. It suggests that a strategy of "bread and circuses" is employed, and that commercial success often leads to critics and skeptics being labeled "short-sighted thinkers." The author states that in business, "money doesn't stink," and commercial magazines are driven by profit. Realistic understanding of the business means less mystery and no need for fantasy or imagination.

It is argued that there is no consensus or "grand coalition" among different factions in the UFO field. Skeptical groups have offered dialogue, but hardcore ufology groups are not interested in de-escalation. They are accused of disguising their intentions through deception, accusing others of ideologically motivated UFO research.

Reinterpreting Myths and the UFO Phenomenon

The article discusses how, in the space age, ancient myths were reinterpreted through a cosmological lens. Authors who "demystified" these myths, only to create a new mythology, achieved great success. Old myths were transformed into "reports from the past," with figures like "sons of gods" and "chariots" being reinterpreted as cosmic messengers. This led to a "modern twilight of the gods" and the "discovery of modern UFOs in ancient rock paintings."

Philosopher Karl Jasper called these phenomena "hallucinations of a paranoid schizophrenic," while Joseph F. Blumrich described Ezekiel's vision as an "extraterrestrial spacecraft landing craft." This confusion forms the basis of UFO research. The article notes that Erich von Däniken's ideas are widely known in Germany, with a significant portion of the population considering them probable, due to extensive media attention.

The Role of Skepticism and the Nature of Evidence

The author positions CENAP as a group that does not engage in a priori UFO rejection but rather seeks to "look behind the scenes" and draw qualified conclusions. This is presented as the purpose of documentary work, for example, at ZDF. However, the constant drive to increase entertainment value in television often trivializes information.

The ZDF broadcast is characterized as "ufologically healthy entertainment" that offers an escape for those who need it, particularly the "herd animals" within ufology. This leads to uncritical jubilation from "the scene," which struggles to distinguish between reality and fiction. The ZDF's quality is seen as having shifted from a societal function to a dysfunction, producing "UFO illusions" similar to ARD's earlier efforts.

The article criticizes the lack of "serious added value" for the viewer in such programs. It acknowledges the desire for escapism from daily life but warns that this can lead to a loss of audience trust. The author aligns with Reiner Wisser's assessment that the ZDF program and CENAP's position are consistent.

The UFO-Fandom and Media Influence

Reactions from UFO and alien fandom circles to the ZDF documentary are described as "incomprehensible." Some viewers praised the documentary for not doubting the existence of UFOs and for being "pro-UFO," even comparing it favorably to a recent Arte documentary. This highlights the problem of media influencing human perception. The "media fiction" itself is seen as self-perpetuating, creating a "vicious cycle."

While philosophical discussions about the "aesthetics of truth's disappearance in the media" are possible, the article argues that the concrete "offer" from media outlets is more problematic. It suggests that ZDF might claim to be "considering minorities," but this refers to political minorities, not those with "esoteric ideas from the subculture." An example is given of a hypothetical program "Angel Founds Religion" to celebrate the Mormon faith, illustrating how media can cater to specific belief groups.

The Challenge of Distinguishing Fact from Fiction

The article notes that the documentary's basis was actually French, not American as some viewers believed. It also points out the willingness of alien-UFO fans to accept information that aligns with their beliefs, even if it's not entirely factual. The author states that if UFOs were discussed only with "unambiguous evidence" or "100% knowledge," there would be little to discuss. The importance of personal thoughts and experiences is acknowledged, but the author emphasizes the need for critical evaluation.

The author expresses a strong belief in the existence of extraterrestrials and unidentified flying objects. However, the responsibility lies with the observer to determine the truthfulness of information. Pro-UFO information is celebrated uncritically, while skeptical information is met with demands for more proof or outright dismissal.

The Nature of UFO Speculation and Skepticism

The article argues that as long as people don't listen to skeptics, there will be plenty of discussion material, driven by speculation. The desire to explain things leads to wild theories, and UFOs and aliens provide the "proof" and "insights" that challenge the establishment, leading science to deny them.

The authors state their fight is for the "dissemination of truth regarding this reality-concealment." They believe that UFO researchers who are merely believers and do not conduct their own investigations are hindering the field. The ufological scene is depicted as a "big fun 'Beach Party'" where participants build "confused and reality-detached constructions" to strengthen themselves in their "most unstable zone." The loss of reality and the "desolate ufological financial situation" are evident.

Exotic-UFO proponents are accused of offering "scientifically factual information" (termed "data") while skeptics are dismissed as offering "unfounded polemics" or "ideologically motivated nonsense" to promote cover-ups. The basic configuration in the ufological belief system is to accuse informed and knowledgeable skeptics of lacking knowledge, while the believers are considered comprehensively and deeply informed. The author asserts the opposite is true.

The Core Assumption of UFOlogy

The "entire" ufology is based on the assumption that UFOs are manned spacecraft from planets outside our solar system. Any evidence of extraterrestrial life in the cosmos leads to jubilation, while researchers who deny life in the cosmos are attacked. The rapid shift from UFO discussions to debates about extraterrestrial life is noted. The author's attempts to distinguish between unidentified flying objects and extraterrestrial life have been met with misunderstanding. There is a strong, almost compulsive connection between these two topics, and rational insight from UFO believers is rarely encountered. The author suggests that this often takes on a pseudo-religious character, serving as an escape point from engaging with the facts of individual UFO sightings and their evidence, and from confronting the associated problems. It is easier to drift into the metaphysical ("beyond the UFO horizon") rather than responding logically and with reasoned arguments.

Conclusion on Media and UFO Coverage

The issue concludes by reiterating that the ZDF broadcast catered to a "consumer" demand for ufological content. However, it questions whether the ZDF's quality convinced viewers. The author sarcastically notes the ZDF's particular way of contributing to "opinion-building." Public broadcasting is expected to provide a minimum of honest information to enable viewers to participate in life and its various aspects. The article contrasts this with private TV, implying public broadcasting should maintain higher quality standards.

The reactions to the ZDF broadcast are contrasted with the expected "information function" of mass media. While the ZDF provided information, it lacked innovation and potential, with an outdated presentation. The author compares this to the tabloid newspaper BILD or the former SED party organ "Neuen Deutschland." True factual and critical information is presented as something different, especially concerning the UFO topic. The ZDF contribution is deemed not even "pseudocritically" reported, lacking even a basic attempt at completeness. The program guide's description of the broadcast was far from an "unbiased description of reality," and there was no apparent will to achieve this. The goal of reality orientation for the audience is to help solve problems.

The broadcast is characterized as mere "entertainment for distraction," with a factor of "self-realization" that often goes hand-in-hand with escapism and a flight from reality. The opinion-building was clearly pro-UFO. If this is considered a "scientific" educational function, it is seen as a socialization of ufological superstition. Critical media, due to their past attractiveness, should ideally serve a critical and control function. Only through a multi-faceted discussion of a controversial topic can a true engagement be achieved, which was lacking here.

The author concludes that the ZDF's approach was not investigative journalism, which is expected from a ZDF documentary, and did not satisfy the desire for knowledge. The author, identifying as a "UFO-Research-Reality-'Fanatic'," expresses frustration with the "ideologically motivated lack of insight" in the ufological "glitter city," where factual issues and content were excluded. This is not a "value discussion" but a demonstration of "faithfulness" and a "will to believe," leading to a refusal to close one's eyes. CENAP's goal is not to reject UFOs a priori but to "look behind the scenes" and draw qualified conclusions. The constant increase in entertainment value in television programming trivializes information.

The ZDF broadcast is described as "ufologically healthy entertainment" that offers an escape for those who need it, particularly the "herd animals" within ufology. This leads to uncritical jubilation from "the scene," which struggles to distinguish between reality and fiction. The ZDF's quality is seen as having shifted from a societal function to a dysfunction, producing "UFO illusions" similar to ARD's earlier efforts.

The article criticizes the lack of "serious added value" for the viewer in such programs. It acknowledges the desire for escapism from daily life but warns that this can lead to a loss of audience trust. The author aligns with Reiner Wisser's assessment that the ZDF program and CENAP's position are consistent.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are media criticism, particularly concerning UFO documentaries, the nature of belief versus skepticism in ufology, and the commercialization of the UFO phenomenon. The editorial stance is clearly critical and skeptical, aiming to debunk unsubstantiated claims, expose media bias, and promote a more rigorous, evidence-based approach to UFO research. The publication emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and distinguishing between factual reporting and sensationalized entertainment.

Title: CENAP Newsflash
Issue: Nr. 10
Date: February 2006

This issue of CENAP Newsflash delves into the complex world of UFOlogy, critically examining its legitimacy, the role of media in shaping public perception, and the enduring fascination with unidentified flying objects.

The Legitimation Crisis of UFOlogy

The article begins by questioning the methods of UFOlogists, suggesting that their arguments often rely on ignoring or misrepresenting facts, leading to a proliferation of inconsistencies. The author expresses a personal approach of being alerted by 'fake' arguments and a tendency to question simplistic explanations, such as the assassination of JFK or the moon landing being staged. The author states that their engagement with the UFO phenomenon is not for emotional comfort but a sober intellectual challenge, quoting the idea that 'It's too good a story to be disproven' and the provocative statement, 'The aliens exist. We are ourselves!'

The issue highlights how media, particularly television programs like those aired on ZDF, have played a significant role in cultivating and maintaining the UFO myth. This collective myth-building strengthens the 'collective unconscious' and creates 'collective visions.' The author posits that the UFO phenomenon could have been explained decades ago, but a lack of assertiveness, character strength, and a firm will prevented this. Despite attempts, the public's and media's desires often led to the failure of such efforts.

International co-production is now common to share costs, and ZDF's involvement with a UFO-themed story from France2 is seen not as a mistake but a deliberate choice within the media landscape.

UFOs as Modern Mythology

The article draws parallels between UFOs and ancient myths, where the sky was considered the seat of the inexplicable. Greek gods descended from Olympus, and religious texts describe celestial beings. These supernatural phenomena have a long tradition, forming part of both ancient and modern mythologies. UFOs are presented as a distinctly modern myth, largely cultivated in esoteric circles. Those who present themselves as modern are, in fact, treading on old paths.

This tendency is also observed in media editorial offices where belief overrides reason. The author emphasizes that dispelling illusions is difficult because reality is often unloved. Venturing towards acknowledging real facts is not easy for everyone. 'Ufological competence teams' are criticized for not wanting to dispel illusions, suggesting that the UFO field is in dire need of a 'reality check.'

Similar to the ZDF broadcast, many UFO-related media reports worldwide have been unsuccessful. When such presentations go unchallenged, they influence cultural thinking. A constant barrage of UFO mystification infiltrates public opinion, leading to a 'UFO-transfiguration.' The article asserts that this has no justification and is symptomatic of UFO reporting, where well-crafted narratives are presented as factual news, creating their own dynamics.

Memes and the Spread of UFO Beliefs

Chip Heath, a social psychologist at Stanford University, has studied the success factors of modern myths, referring to them as 'memes' – information viruses that spread like pathogens. Researchers diagnose a global epidemic of delusion and lies, with the internet acting as a willing host, giving urban legends new momentum. Some storytellers do it for fun, but the insidious aspect is that it's easy for them.

Media Analysis: ZDF, History Channel, and 'Das UFO-Rätsel'

The article criticizes television documentaries about UFOs, including those by ARTE and ZDF, for failing to produce anything substantial. The author contrasts the ZDF's handling of the topic with the History Channel's US production, 'The UFO Hunters.' While acknowledging that the US production might present MUFON (USA) somewhat favorably, it is deemed far superior to the ZDF's 'UFO-dictatorship.' The 'UFO Hunters' program is praised for its engaging content, including a story about a witness who found a strange, disc-shaped object that fell from a UFO. This object, composed of 99% aluminum, had an isotopic signature similar to Mars meteorites.

The author laments that the ZDF chose to air a French production ('Das UFO-Rätsel') instead of the more compelling American material, suggesting that the Americans 'simply do it better.'

Explaining the Unexplained: Weather Phenomena and Misinterpretations

A significant portion of the issue addresses the misinterpretation of natural phenomena as UFOs. Following a ZDF broadcast, the author received calls about 'silent lightning' and 'powerful sky illuminations' observed on the horizon. These were described as powerful, silent flashes and bright white lights illuminating clouds, compared by some to 'Alien-lightning' from 'War of the Worlds.'

Silvia Kowollik from Stuttgart described a similar experience, noting the bright, colorful flashes within clouds and their silent nature. The author suggests that people today, accustomed to technology and constant media input, have lost touch with natural occurrences like thunderstorms and ball lightning. The prevalence of sci-fi films depicting such events leads people to immediately cry 'Alien alarm!'

UFOs: Belief or Certainty?

An article from the 'Trierischer Volksfreund' by Hans-Peter Linz is discussed, framing UFOs as one of the last modern myths. It highlights the division between 'believers' and 'skeptics,' referencing the 'I want to believe' motto from the TV series 'The X-Files.' The origin of the UFO legend is traced back to Kenneth Arnold's 1947 sighting.

Werner Walter, an amateur astronomer and administrator of the website www.cenap.de, which registers UFO sightings, states that about 95% of reported cases can be explained by mundane phenomena like bright stars, meteors, or balloons. However, the remaining 5% of uncertainty keeps the UFO community engaged. Walter recounts a case near Greifswald where lights seen over the sea were later identified as signal flare bombs from a naval exercise, noting that residents were aware of the maneuver but weren't asked for information.

Conspiracy Theories and the Role of Media

Walter describes the UFO phenomenon as a recurring conspiracy narrative that binds believers. He points out that the US Air Force's denial of the Roswell crash was interpreted by believers as a deliberate government deception, perpetuating the cycle of discussion. The growth of 'conspiracy theorists' is linked to the popularity of 'The X-Files.'

While skeptical scientists are no longer as dismissive as they were in the 1960s and 70s, and new astronomical discoveries offer competition to Hollywood's alien imagery, the UFO boom is seen as potentially waning. However, the article notes that the myth of alien abduction is linked to 'false memories,' where traumatic experiences are processed through Hollywood-influenced imagery.

Astral Travel and Esoteric Groups

Matthias Neff, a sect spokesperson, distinguishes between those who scientifically investigate UFOs and those who believe. He mentions individuals who claim to travel to other planets via astral projection and communicate with aliens, often referred to as esoterics or 'ambassadors of the extraterrestrials.' These groups, which may replace religion with UFO belief, include Scientology, the Rael Movement, and Fiat Lux, and they pursue political goals. Neff highlights the danger of groups like 'Heaven's Gate,' which led to mass suicide based on beliefs of reaching a better planet via astral travel.

He also notes that the scene is characterized by optimism and trust in science, with the 'alien abduction' myth being a modern icon. This myth is tied to 'false memory,' where traumatic events are reinterpreted through the pervasive influence of Hollywood's visual culture, leading to the creation of new myths and legends.

Conclusion and Editorial Stance

The article concludes by reiterating that many UFO sightings can be explained, but a residual percentage remains. This uncertainty is what continues to engage both UFO believers and skeptics. The author expresses a critical stance towards media sensationalism and the uncritical acceptance of UFO narratives, advocating for a more rational and evidence-based approach while acknowledging the persistent allure of the unknown.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical analysis of UFOlogy, the powerful influence of media on public perception of UFOs, the historical and mythological roots of belief in celestial phenomena, and the psychological aspects of belief and skepticism. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, emphasizing the need for rational investigation, the debunking of misinformation, and a critical examination of how media constructs and perpetuates myths. The publication aims to provide a more grounded perspective on the UFO phenomenon, distinguishing between verifiable facts and unsubstantiated beliefs.