CENAP Newsflash - No 15-1

Magazine Overview

Title: CENAP NEWSFLASH
Issue: Nr. 15
Date: November 2005
Publisher: CENAP
Country: Germany
Language: German

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, a long-standing German non-commercial UFO journal, delves into a critical examination of UFO research under the provocative title "Angriff auf die UFO-Forschung" (Attack on UFO Research). The publication, edited by Werner Walter, positions itself as a critical voice within the UFO community, aiming to provide a fundamental contribution to the topic.

Editorial Stance and Introduction

Werner Walter, in his introductory remarks, sets a critical tone, stating that "We play our game under the endless sky, above which the infinite ocean of stars begins. UFOlogy is such a game..." He expresses a long-standing suspicion towards the sensationalism often associated with UFO phenomena, emphasizing the importance of maintaining autonomy in research. He warns purists against reading this publication if they are not prepared to confront potentially uncomfortable truths about UFOlogy and its management, suggesting that rational discussion with those deeply entrenched in belief is difficult.

The editorial highlights that the issue will present truths about UFOlogy and the thinking of UFOlogists, as observed over three decades of intense engagement. It aims to address the problematic aspects of UFO phenomenon investigation, which the author likens to suffering from a form of "nerve poison" that has been self-injected for decades. The article promises insights into the structures, rituals, and ceremonies within the popular UFO mindset, contrasting it with the pursuit of truth, which is often less profitable than sensational stories.

It suggests that many UFO enthusiasts are drawn to exotic stories and view UFOlogists as spiritual guides, mistaking decorative elements for genuine phenomena. These fans are described as defending their beliefs fervently, acting as unwitting fans of modern-day "Jules Vernes" whose imaginative narratives captivate them.

The Nature of UFO Belief and Investigation

The article explores the allure of UFOs, questioning whether they represent the greatest story ever told or merely a product for those seeking an escape from rational reality. It posits that the daily grind of rational existence can lead people to seek solace in the realm of fiction and fantasy, potentially leading to the development of alternative realities or illusions. The author warns that getting caught up in this can lead to a form of "brainwashing" and a descent into fanaticism, where individuals may even seek to discredit skeptics.

It touches upon the idea that the human need for philosophy and the desire to understand the world can lead people to embrace questionable beliefs, especially when facing personal crises. The piece critiques the "hysteria" surrounding phenomena like alien "cannabis" and the associated excesses, describing a journey into a world of magic, secret sciences, and subjective perfection. It notes that many who are drawn into this world do not question whether their newfound "insights" are mere illusions, finding stability in such beliefs.

The author observes a persistent wave of epic, mythological narratives about celestial phenomena that have captivated audiences for nearly 60 years. These stories, adapted for the space age, offer a compelling allure, particularly the idea of a fantastic connection between space and time. The core question for many UFO fans is "What if this were all true?" and many wish for this to be the case, seeing it as a gateway to a "greater reality."

Critiques of UFOlogy and Skepticism

The article presents a strong skeptical viewpoint, suggesting that many UFO claims are based on flawed perceptions, wishful thinking, and a desire to escape the mundane. It criticizes the tendency to create "pseudo-truth constructs" when individuals fail to fully engage with reality. The author contrasts this with the need for a grounded understanding of the world, suggesting that a lack of critical thinking allows these constructs to flourish.

It discusses the human need to hear and tell stories, particularly those that are strange, bizarre, or frightening, allowing individuals to feel like storytellers themselves. The article notes that "urban legends," including UFO sightings, often appeal to strong emotions like fear, disgust, or outrage, making them highly contagious and difficult to debunk.

The issue delves into the problematic distinction between "fictional" and "non-fictional" accounts within UFOlogy. It argues that UFO witness testimonies often fall into this ambiguous space, where interpretations of myths can lead to the construction of fantastic UFO models. The author questions why many UFO fans have not learned from similar historical belief systems, highlighting the enduring mystery of human nature.

The Condon Report and Scientific Scrutiny

A significant portion of the article is dedicated to the Condon Report, a scientific study commissioned by the University of Colorado to investigate the UFO question. The report, released in 1968, concluded that UFO research had not contributed to scientific knowledge and was unlikely to do so in the future. It found insufficient evidence to support the hypothesis of extraterrestrial visitors. The article notes that the Condon Report also acknowledged unexplained UFO cases and pointed out limitations in understanding atmospheric optics, radio wave propagation, and atmospheric electricity.

Despite the report's conclusions, the article highlights that the "UFO image" persists, with one-third of the cases in the Condon Report remaining unexplained. It criticizes the tendency of some UFO proponents to dismiss the report or misrepresent its findings, often by ignoring its more liberal statements or its acknowledgment of ongoing scientific uncertainties. The author points out that Condon himself stated that while there was no convincing evidence of extraterrestrials at the time, this could change in the future.

The article also references a statement by Dr. Condon in 1968 expressing his personal skepticism, stating he would only believe in alien saucers if he could see one, touch it, enter it, have it analyzed in a laboratory, and perhaps even capture it.

Critiques of "Super-Secret Groups" and UFOlogists

The article debunks the notion of "super-secret groups" controlling UFO information, as proposed by figures like Adolf Schneider. Schneider alleged that progressive scientists and technicians were suppressed by powerful economic interests and military-industrial complexes, leading to a "standstill in the dissemination of truth" by "super-secret groups." The article dismisses these claims as exaggerated, pointing out that organizations like the "Beacon Hill Group" were advisory bodies and that information about UFOs was often publicly available, with journalists even having access to information outside of official hours.

It criticizes Schneider's specific naming of alleged secret groups (Pentagon's Air Force Intelligence Directorate, 4602d Air Intelligence Service Squadron, and ATIC in Dayton, Ohio) as evidence of his ignorance, arguing that these entities were not secret and that information was accessible to those who inquired.

The Role of Myth and Psychology

The article emphasizes the powerful role of myth in shaping human understanding and perception. It suggests that UFOlogy often functions as a modern mythology, providing a framework for understanding the unknown and fulfilling a psychological need for the extraordinary. The author argues that people are inherently drawn to myths and stories, especially those that evoke strong emotions, and that these narratives can be more influential than rational arguments.

It discusses how the societal function and impact of myths, particularly through pop culture and UFO-themed media, shape our understanding of the world. The article suggests that the UFO phenomenon, like "urban legends," taps into a collective desire for the unexplained and the fantastic, offering a sense of "greater reality" to enthusiasts.

The author notes that the "demystification" of wonders is problematic because humans seem to need illusions. This need, he suggests, is a fundamental part of human nature, leading to irrational behavior and a susceptibility to manipulation. The article concludes by stating that the distinction between fictional and non-fictional accounts is crucial in understanding UFO claims, and that the field is often characterized by a blurring of these lines.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards unsubstantiated UFO claims, a critical analysis of UFOlogy as a field, the psychological underpinnings of belief in the paranormal, and the role of myth and media in shaping public perception. The editorial stance is clearly one of critical inquiry, aiming to separate factual investigation from sensationalism and mythological narratives. The publication advocates for a more grounded and evidence-based approach to understanding unexplained phenomena, while acknowledging the human fascination with the unknown.

CENAP Newsflash Nr. 15, November 2005, is a German-language publication that critically examines the phenomenon of ufology. The issue delves into the psychological, social, and quasi-religious aspects of UFO belief, contrasting it with scientific investigation and rational thought.

The Nature of UFO Belief

The publication argues that many personal convictions regarding UFOs are not based on scientific evidence but rather on a desire for a 'scientific rebellion' or a form of 'salesmanship' that promotes a product. It posits that 'Alien Encounters' are appealing because they offer a seemingly superior extraterrestrial culture with secret knowledge, serving as a substitute religion that fosters hope. This 'contactee movement' is seen as having a significant creative influence on ufology, promoting a pseudoreligious outlook.

The issue contends that these 'contactee stories' are often staged encounters, designed as initiations to supposedly better humanity. This is paralleled with the 'ancient astronaut' theory, which suggests a guiding extraterrestrial intelligence influencing human evolution. The 'original contactees' are identified as key figures in ufology, leading to a pseudoscientific and misguided field that mixes authentic phenomena with fictional elements like 'flying saucers' and alien encounters to create a total mystification.

Scientific Acceptance and UFOs

A core argument is based on the principle of scientific acceptance: if something is indistinguishable theoretically or practically, it must be the same. When something interacts with us and is verifiable, it is considered part of the natural world. However, exotic UFOs are excluded because they lack sufficient 'convincing power.' UFOlogical evidence is described as 'chaotic,' yet even chaotic events should leave traces that could be scientifically investigated. The text refutes the notion that science only deals with regular or lab-controlled phenomena, citing evolutionary theory and cosmology as examples of scientific inquiry into singular or rare events. Any interaction with the material world leaves traces that can be researched.

The issue asserts that naturalism and supernaturalism are essentially the same, with differences being artificial constructs. The problem with UFOs, it argues, is their lack of distinction from irrelevant phenomena, making them inconsequential. This is seen as a core issue for ufology, despite contradicting its positions.

The 'UFO Patriot' and Skepticism

The publication questions the identity of an 'upright UFO interest,' a 'UFO Patriot,' who allegedly 'shoots down' UFO skeptics with misinformation. This is framed as a defense of UFO beliefs, driven by a desire to bring about a 'revolution' in the minds of 'conservatives' by promoting 'real' UFOs. This is characterized as a 'revenge campaign' against perceived 'enemies.' The author suggests that this is a way to achieve 'ufological welfare' and validate a 'truth' that has already been established by 'grandmasters' of the scene, creating a self-sustaining cycle within the 'critical mass of ufology.'

It is noted that there is a division between UFO ideologues and UFO 'jokers,' with both sides engaging in a high-stakes game. The goal is to convince skeptics of the 'UFO religion.' The author suggests that a case being declared 'irrefutable' would be a major triumph for ufology, potentially leading to a 'mass-orgiastic triumph.' This is linked to a desire for satisfaction and exploiting the public's fascination with the mysterious.

The Nature of UFO Phenomena and Investigation

The issue criticizes the tendency to dismiss UFO witnesses as liars or mentally unstable, stating that while exceptions exist, this is not the norm. It suggests that the question is which side can sell itself better. The 'mumbo-jumbo' of pseudoscientific ufology is seen as more successful because it offers windows into other realities and a dazzling 'glitter palace' that leads to a loss of reality. Despite a lack of scientific evidence, these narratives are presented as 'true X-Files' that promise a breakthrough into another reality.

The text highlights a fundamental problem in UFO research: the debate often centers on the existence of aliens and their presence on Earth, rather than on the actual sightings of unidentified flying objects. This is linked to the historical association of UFOs with 'flying saucers' and the 'contactee movement,' which predates the neutral term 'UFO.' This historical framing, driven by emotion rather than rationality, has created a powerful symbolic force.

Critique of Ufological Methodology

The publication argues that a serious approach to the UFO topic requires rational engagement, which is often lacking among UFO enthusiasts. It suggests that internal conflicts and naive acceptance lead to a pseudoscientific approach. The author states that unidentified flying object sightings are numerous and that witnesses are often honest in their reporting of inexplicable events. However, the issue lies in the interpretation, where 'utopia and reality' merge, especially when exotic interpretations are applied. The UFO phenomenon is seen as a reflection of human wishful thinking, influenced by historical narratives of 'flying saucers.' The author suggests that ufology is more about what happens in the mind than what actually occurs in the sky, invoking the 'Oz factor' to explain the creation of 'SF-UFOs.'

Belief vs. Rationality

The issue emphasizes that a belief system without miracles does not function, as miracles provide hope. It critiques the idea that the supernatural should be invoked to understand phenomena, arguing that if something exists, it must interact with the natural world in a verifiable way. The author posits that the ufological world has not yet reached the domain of natural sciences because a concrete UFO proof is missing.

The text distinguishes between 'believers' and 'skeptics,' noting that the latter are often viewed negatively within the UFO community. It criticizes the tendency to dismiss skeptical arguments as attempts to undermine the 'right to believe.' The author stresses that a methodologically sound approach is crucial for any serious UFO investigation, but this is often overlooked in favor of uncritical acceptance.

The 'UFO Phenomenon' as Social and Religious Critique

Ufology is described as a 'veiled and comical form of social critique,' disguised as a 'destiny of the universe.' It is seen as a way for individuals disillusioned with life on Earth to seek a better existence elsewhere. The issue suggests that the search for a 'paradise' can lead to getting lost in a mental 'universe,' and that exchanging ideas within like-minded groups can provide a sense of not being alone.

The publication questions whether humans are simply not intelligent enough to grasp certain things, but argues against resorting to the supernatural. It notes the concept of a 'God of the gaps,' where the divine is invoked to explain phenomena not yet understood by science. The 'intelligent design' movement is presented as a counter-movement to rationalism.

The author states clearly that 'UFOs' exist for certain people, but the crucial question is the meaning attributed to them. The field of 'religious psychology' is mentioned as a way to understand subjective religiosity and spirituality, not as proof of objective truth. The issue suggests that UFO witnesses are often credible in their reporting of what they saw, even if it was a misidentified object like a balloon or Venus. However, it is the interpretation and the 'exotic alienations' that create the 'UFO phenomenon' in the mind.

The Role of Fandom and Fanaticism

The text distinguishes between fandom and fanaticism, noting that the former involves living faith within a community, while the latter can lead to a 'social component' within the community where belief, rather than critical examination, is paramount. The author argues that pure academic discussion is insufficient to break down the rigid structures of ufology, which often relies on shared 'belief experiences' that exist beyond common sense and logic. Belief is seen as a fascinating force that drives growth, providing a sense of security within a community.

However, the issue calls for a critical corrective, as facts can disrupt a 'good story.' The ufological community tends to focus only on what aligns with its existing structures, hindering the development of new types of UFO researchers. The author advocates for less ufology and more strenuous, pragmatic research with open-minded individuals. The ufological journalism is characterized as a 'borderless mush' of events and fiction, serving the orientation needs of the public rather than engaging in cool, investigative journalism.

Spiritual Spheres and Scientific Limits

The concept of a 'spiritual sphere' is explored, defined as something existing 'beyond' or 'outside' the natural world. The text outlines possibilities of interaction between this spiritual sphere and the natural world, concluding that if it exists and interacts, it must do so according to discernible rules. The ufological world has not yet achieved the domain of natural sciences due to the lack of exotic UFO evidence. The author notes that even natural sciences have explained phenomena that were once considered inexplicable.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critique of ufology as a pseudoscientific and pseudoreligious phenomenon. The publication emphasizes the importance of critical thinking, scientific methodology, and empirical evidence. It argues that many UFO beliefs are driven by psychological needs, wishful thinking, and a desire for meaning or belonging, rather than by verifiable facts. The editorial stance is clearly skeptical, advocating for a rational and evidence-based approach to understanding unexplained phenomena, while acknowledging the human need for belief and wonder.

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, dated November 2005, delves into a critical examination of ufology, questioning its methodologies, the beliefs of its proponents, and its relationship with scientific inquiry and reality. The publication adopts a skeptical stance, aiming to dissect the phenomenon and its cultural impact.

The 'Dark Chamber': Republicans and Clerics

The article begins by likening the political landscape of democracies to a constant adaptation to reality, suggesting that for ufology, integration into this reality is an exception rather than the rule. Few protagonists in the field seem interested in this integration, making the subject inherently difficult. The author posits that the UFO phenomenon itself presents a fundamental problem for UFO research, which often prefers to dismiss genuine inquiry with a dismissive gesture while pretending otherwise.

The 'Multicultural UFO Community' Myth

A central argument is that a truly 'multicultural UFO community' does not exist. The broader ufological movement is presented as lacking a common foundation based on reason, with many adherents prioritizing other 'better' beliefs over common sense and logic. This is attributed to a fear of confronting this reality, leading to a situation where the author believes ufology is unlikely to be integrated into mainstream science. Despite the goal of ufology becoming a 'science of the future' for nearly 60 years, the author observes a lack of prerequisite-free engagement and an overabundance of worldviews that obscure the path forward. There is also a critique of the perceived 'unemployment' and 'pause' in research activities within the believing community, despite the vast amount of work to be done. The author notes the abundance of 'Stammtisch-Geschwätz' (pub talk) and the constant focus on UFO skeptics.

Rebellion vs. Revolution

The author clarifies that 'rebellious' does not equate to 'revolutionary' or 'martyrdom.' A 'radical UFOlogy' orientation is seen as an aversion to societal and scientific norms, a defiance of 'establishment' and 'contrasting realities.' This is driven by a hidden hope to challenge authorities with 'crazy stories' and to present new dimensions as a contrast to everyday life. This behavior is compared to that of adolescents rebelling against their parents, suggesting that many ufologists, regardless of age, maintain a youthful, oppositional mindset.

UFOs as 'Holy Communion'

The issue highlights the notion of UFOs being treated as a form of 'Holy Communion,' and the saying 'trodden quark becomes wide and not strong' is invoked. The author suggests that within ufology, one must constantly fight to maintain sanity, adopting a 'cool way' to reflect on one's own ufologically cultivated worldview. This dilemma is compounded by the potential presence of 'sleeping agents' within the ufological community who may feign skepticism to mislead others, causing internal crises.

The 'False Prophet' and Hidden Motives

It is suggested that discerning the true intentions and motives behind the stories presented by individuals is not always easy. The author admits to having been led astray by false trails and being deceived, a sentiment shared by many.

The 'Fingerspitzengefühl' Approach

To counter these deceptions, the author advocates for 'fingerspitzengefühl' (intuition or gut feeling) and a skeptical approach to anything deviating from the 'IFO-factor' and its broad spectrum. This skepticism is deemed necessary due to numerous past misjudgments of cases, where what were believed to be genuine UFOs turned out to be IFOs (Identified Flying Objects). The author laments that those who fail to recognize this simple truth continue to deceive themselves, perpetuating a flawed understanding of ufology and a lack of critical self-assessment.

The 'Dark Era' and 'Engel/Erlöser'

The text describes a 'dark era' where UFOs are seen by enthusiasts as 'angels/saviors in spaceships.' These offer a new perspective, tailored to individual preferences. This pursuit is sometimes viewed as a mental defense mechanism against an unloved, mundane reality. The author notes that the 'flying saucer theme' is used to observe human society from an external perspective, especially for those who feel disconnected from it.

Conspiracy Theories and the 'World of Illusion'

Conspiracy theories are presented as a means to explain the world through adventurous 'backdoors,' leading to a chaotic mental state. The author expresses doubt about the judgment of some ufologists, particularly their stance towards skeptics, and suggests that ufology requires a self-sanitation before its inevitable collapse. The 'ideological guardians' are seen as struggling unnecessarily, having dedicated themselves to the subject with heart and soul, yet some participate in research discussions without adequate knowledge.

The 'UFO Hinterhof' and 'Mosque'

This leads to the creation of a parallel ufological society, detached from critical problems and reality. The 'ufological backyard' is transformed into a 'mosque' to contribute to the 're-enchantment of the world.'

The 'Niemandsland' of Irrationality

This approach manifests in the content and communication within the community, often taking place in a 'no man's land' at the crossroads of irrationality and madness. To achieve success, a logical step backward is needed, paradoxically improving the world. This is seen as the secret motto of those selling the 'UFO phantom,' presenting unattainable, abstract ideals as absolute reality.

Ethnology and Understanding

Ethnology begins when alternative perspectives are accepted, not necessarily for oneself, but in principle. This allows for giving meaning to cultural actions and interpreting them. To succeed, one must step back; ethnology is not about improving the world, but about understanding it.

Knowledge Acquisition and the Cosmos

With gained knowledge, one can proceed to improve things, but the process of gaining knowledge must be free from the desire for world improvement or personal ethical-moral beliefs. This is crucial for maintaining a detached perspective. The author draws a parallel to the old UFO culture and the flying saucer dilemma. Culture shapes us, and our narratives shape culture. 'Writing Culture Writing Tricksters' creates a 'hermetic phantasmagoria,' where scientific knowledge alone is insufficient to understand and interpret the world. Art and artistic devices are employed to create a pseudoscientific artwork, temporarily paralyzing the consumer's disbelief.

A Visit to the Edge of Madness

The issue contrasts two types of knowledge acquisition: scientific knowledge, which is verifiable, and religious knowledge, which is based on faith in pre-existing authority and revelation. Scientific knowledge is presented as functional and capable of making precise predictions, whereas religious prophecies are often vague and subject to endless interpretation. While acknowledging that scientists are human and fallible, the author notes that modern science, as a global enterprise, should theoretically minimize individual errors.

The UFO Phenomenon and its Critics

The article discusses the challenge of identifying UFOs as extraterrestrial spacecraft, stating that no evidence exists that aligns with science and common sense. UFO photographs are compared to those of the Loch Ness Monster, often being blurry or outright fakes. Alleged physical evidence, such as crash debris or implants, has consistently been found to be terrestrial in origin. The primary reasons people believe in UFOs are the inability to distinguish science fiction from science, a willingness to believe incompetent individuals, and a distrust of sources that contradict their beliefs, often attributed to a conspiracy of silence.

The 'Gott' and 'Aliens' Parallel

Belief in UFOs is directly linked to belief in God, with aliens serving as a modern substitute for angels. UFOlogy is described as the mythology of the space age, a product of creative fantasy serving poetic and existential purposes, offering deeper roots and cosmic orientation. The gods of Olympus have become space travelers.

The 'UFO-IFO Context' and 'Red Bull'

The weapon of ufological belief is the implementation of the true UFO-IFO context into a transcendental order, creating unique worlds. The author criticizes the 'ufological kings' whose 'UFO evidence' has repeatedly collapsed, leaving 'truly unknown' flying objects as irrelevant. UFOlogists are accused of creating 'overrides' to keep old legends alive with new variations, engaging in 'undercover' work and playing games with researchers for self-promotion. This involves embellishing the public perception of UFOs, even when the reality is 'bad' and the ufologist may know how poorly their 'believer standing' is perceived.

'Photoshop' for Reality

The ufological movement is described as a 'Photoshop' program for reality, correcting and altering the depiction of UFOs. This has made it difficult for UFO critics, as many UFO enthusiasts are willing to overlook the 'lies' of their gurus for their own benefit. The author notes that even when confronted with factual inaccuracies, individuals may offer excuses or claim to have simply made a mistake, especially when it serves the purpose of 'image optimization.' The process of marketing a new product is compared to the challenge of making the UFO question understandable and credible to the general public.

The 'Flying Saucer' as a Commodity

The 'flying saucer' is presented as a speculative commodity, akin to sexually suggestive imagery in men's magazines. While minor errors might be forgiven, a consistent pattern of factual inaccuracies for the sake of 'image optimization' is seen as problematic. The author acknowledges that mistakes can happen but points out that when this becomes a sustained practice in ufological reporting, it indicates a different agenda. The entire narrative of UFO landings, alien encounters, and abductions is characterized as a grand fairy tale, a captivating adventure that has become somewhat stale.

The 'UFO Arsenal' and Illusion

Ufology possesses a full 'arsenal' to construct an almost perfect illusion, which only breaks down upon close inspection. This close inspection is a luxury few researchers can afford. 'UFO liberation fighters' may intervene to counter the successes of knowledgeable UFO critics, aiming to reclaim the 'ufological colonial era' in public and media, thereby defending ufological honor.

The 'Homo UFOlogis' and the Search for Meaning

The search for the 'Homo UFOlogis' leads to a strange world between dream and reality, a dimension of exaggeration where UFOs are presented as crucial for humanity. This is driven by a desire for personal amusement, with individuals preferring the ufological chaos over conversion. Lies and distortions are integral to ufological literature, which may generate 'persuasion perpetrators' who act as figures of resistance against realists, preventing them from recognizing the 'household truth' of ufological research.

The 'Order' of Ufology

This process is part of the unrecognized and often hidden creative process of ufology and its efforts to maintain its 'culture' by creating 'order' and silencing critics. 'Masters' of trickery and disguise manipulate others, sometimes out of pure schadenfreude, to embellish urban myths or simply for amusement. This involves stretching the truth until it can no longer hold, a functional level of 'charisma' used to project an aura of uncanny salesmanship for dubious materials. A 'social' distance is created from lower levels.

Einstein and UFO Theologians

Albert Einstein's early career as a 'technical expert of the third class' at the Bern Patent Office is mentioned as a precursor to his groundbreaking work. This is contrasted with 'UFO theologians' who, when delving into physics, introduce confused 'world-improving theses.' The official statements on currency do not necessarily represent a magical hurdle.

Revelations and 'Inner Security'

Revelations about ufology and UFO phenomenon exploration, along with the issue of 'inner security,' are presented as further dilemmas. UFO sellers gain points by emphasizing visual effects, consciously part of conveying the alien visitor story and presenting a utopian vision of ufological Disneyland. When this fails, they quickly disappear, moving on to other ventures. UFO picture books filled with 'evidence photos' have been their primary tool for promoting business, despite the consensus that photographic evidence without reliable witness reports is not conclusive.

'UFO Evidence Videos'

In the age of a flood of 'UFO evidence videos,' it is alarming to note that little is known about the videographer or the sighting case itself. The author references older Hesemann 'UFO 'Documentary' video series from the 1990s, which have led many people astray.

The Artistry of Ufological Success Writers

The artistry of ufological 'success writers' lies in making constructed scenarios appear 'real,' thereby winning over an often uncritical audience. This is described as 'market-driven,' offering exotic UFOs and flying saucers as alien visitor spaceships, which is what interests most UFO freaks. The goal is to make consumers believe in a simulated 'world' as real and draw conclusions they wouldn't otherwise make.

The 'Perverse' Nature of Denial

The 'perverse' aspect is how many people who could access unadulterated information consistently refuse to do so because it presents 'bad guys,' not 'soldiers of ufology.' For supposedly unbiased 'brave soldiers,' loyalty to the ufological concept overrides logic and common sense. The UFO movement vehemently resists this notion, akin to a DDR border fence with a 'Halt - here is the demarcation line!' sign.

CENAP REPORT and GEP

Insidermagazines like the former CENAP REPORT and its current online edition, along with the 'Journal for UFO Research' of the GEP, have minimal circulation because they show the unadulterated UFO picture. In the ufological 'garrison,' people are reluctant to hear about what is happening in the world. The voice of reason is always lonely. The question is who is the real fool.

Success and Secret Drivers

One must almost 'smell' the flying saucers when encountering a ufological speculative or commercial object. A 'flying saucer' on the cover is as significant as ample breasts on a men's magazine as a 'criterion of suitability.' While minor 'mistakes' may be forgiven, consistent factual inaccuracies or statements, even if presented as unintentional, can open a comforting backdoor, suggesting the author or quoted person simply erred. While such errors can occur (even to the author), when it becomes a sustained practice for 'image optimization,' the situation changes. The entire UFOlogy narrative, with its landings, alien encounters, and abductions, is dismissed as a grand fairy tale, a captivating adventure that has become somewhat stale.

The 'UFO Arsenal' and Illusion

Ufology possesses a full 'arsenal' to construct an almost perfect illusion, which only breaks down upon close inspection. This close inspection is a luxury few researchers can afford. 'UFO liberation fighters' may intervene to counter the successes of knowledgeable UFO critics, aiming to reclaim the 'ufological colonial era' in public and media, thereby defending ufological honor.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around a strong critique of ufology, emphasizing the importance of scientific evidence, critical thinking, and skepticism. The editorial stance is clearly against the uncritical acceptance of UFO claims and highlights the psychological and sociological factors that contribute to belief in the paranormal. The publication advocates for a rational approach to understanding phenomena, distinguishing between verifiable facts and speculative narratives, and questioning the motives behind the promotion of ufological narratives. The issue consistently contrasts the perceived 'irrationality' and 'belief-driven' nature of ufology with the 'evidence-based' and 'logical' approach of scientific inquiry.

This issue of CENAP Newsflash, dated November 2005, delves into a critical examination of ufology and related phenomena. The publication adopts a strongly skeptical stance, arguing that much of what is presented as UFOlogy is a form of manipulation, conspiracy theorizing, and pseudo-science, rather than genuine scientific inquiry. The articles suggest that the allure of the extraordinary and the desire for 'hidden knowledge' lead many to embrace unsubstantiated claims, often at the expense of critical thinking and rational analysis.

The Nature of Ufology: Manipulation and Belief Systems

The issue posits that ufology is not a true science but rather a 'science fiction religion' or a 'belief system' that thrives on sensationalism and conspiracy. It suggests that 'ufologists' often manipulate public perception through elaborate narratives, films, and documentaries, a practice likened to military 'Psy-Ops' (psychological operations). The article criticizes the tendency for UFO enthusiasts to blindly accept heroic narratives and to reject any scientific explanations that contradict their preconceived notions. This 'self-mythologization' of the UFO theme is seen as a way to maintain a sense of special knowledge and community.

Rejection of Rationality and the 'Frankenstein Factor'

A central theme is the rejection of rational explanations by many in the UFO community. The article highlights how facts that contradict established theories are ignored, using the 'Moon Landing Hoax' as an example of how absurdities are introduced to support theories. It quotes actor Tom Hanks, who commented on how the spread of foolishness can be profitable, and how paranoid belief systems can lead to the promotion of ideas like astrology and even the questioning of historical events like the Holocaust. The concept of the 'Frankenstein Factor' is introduced to describe the creation of a fabricated reality from a mix of fiction, half-truths, and distorted facts, often driven by economic interests and a desire to preserve a particular worldview.

The Role of Media and 'UFOtainment'

The publication points to the role of media, including films and TV documentaries, in shaping public perception and creating a 'UFOtainment' culture. It argues that this entertainment-driven approach to UFOs, while popular, trivializes the phenomenon and discourages serious investigation. The article criticizes the marketing strategies employed by some in the UFO field, which it claims are designed to satisfy customer desires for the sensational rather than to pursue objective truth. The idea of 'ufological market economy without sociality' is mentioned, where dreams are exploited for profit.

Skepticism vs. Belief: The 'Paradox' of UFOlogy

The issue contrasts the approach of 'ufologists' with that of genuine researchers and skeptics. It suggests that skeptics are often viewed negatively because they challenge cherished beliefs. The article argues that while many UFO stories are presented as extraordinary, they often have mundane explanations that are overlooked or dismissed by believers. The 'paradox' of ufology is that it claims to seek answers but often resists the very rational inquiry that could provide them. The article also touches upon the idea that some people are drawn to UFOs and extraterrestrial themes due to a desire for meaning or a sense of belonging, seeking 'hidden knowledge' or spiritual fulfillment.

Specific Cases and Critiques

The issue examines specific alleged UFO incidents, such as the Catalina Island film and a sighting in Colorado, presenting them as examples of how visual evidence can be misinterpreted or manipulated. It questions the authenticity of these 'proofs,' suggesting that simple explanations like birds or aircraft are ignored in favor of sensational interpretations. The article also critiques the use of opinion polls and questionnaires, such as the NICAP questionnaire, to bolster the belief in UFOs, arguing that such methods can be misleading and are used to manipulate public thought.

The 'UFO-Project Manager' and the Business of Belief

The term 'UFO-Project Manager' is used to describe individuals who profit from the UFO phenomenon. These individuals are seen as shaping the thinking of UFO fans through their 'gurus' and marketing strategies, creating a 'tissue' of ufology composed of fiction, half-truths, and distortions. The article suggests that the pursuit of 'ufological' recognition and acceptance is a driving force, leading to a 'battle of beliefs' where rational explanations are seen as a threat.

The 'Frankenstein Factor' and the 'Ufological Republic'

The 'Frankenstein Factor' is further elaborated as the creation of an artificial reality, a 'new reality' that consumers love. This is linked to the idea of an 'ufological republic' populated by individuals who are 'trapped in spiritual fetters' and believe they have overcome limitations by spreading 'sexy' facts. These individuals are driven by 'ufological priests' who disseminate fantastic wonders. The article criticizes the tendency to conflate different anomalous phenomena, such as UFOs and the Loch Ness Monster, under a broad 'ufological' umbrella, arguing that this lacks coherence.

The 'Impossible Can Be Possible' and the Defense of Belief

The issue concludes by discussing the mindset that 'the impossible can be possible,' which is used to justify belief in UFOs even in the absence of concrete evidence. It criticizes the way some individuals and organizations, like 'Creative Moments,' present 'evidence' that is easily debunked upon closer inspection. The article suggests that the growing knowledge about 'identified flying objects' (IFOs) is perceived as a threat by ufologists, who then retreat into a 'mental ark' to defend their beliefs. The emotional and often irrational defense of these beliefs is highlighted, contrasting with the scientific approach of seeking verifiable evidence. The article implies that many UFO enthusiasts are not interested in genuine explanations but prefer to maintain their fantastical worldview, equating UFOs with 'angels' or 'modern conquerors' and their occupants with new gods.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critique of ufology as a pseudo-science, the prevalence of conspiracy theories, the manipulation of public perception through media, and the importance of critical thinking and rational analysis. The editorial stance is unequivocally skeptical, aiming to debunk what it perceives as unfounded beliefs and to expose the commercial and psychological underpinnings of the UFO phenomenon. The publication positions itself as a voice of reason against what it views as a growing trend of irrationality and anti-establishment sentiment fueled by sensationalized accounts of UFOs and extraterrestrial encounters.

CENAP Newsflash Nr. 15, November 2005, is a German-language publication that delves into the complexities of skepticism, particularly in relation to UFO phenomena and paranormal claims. The issue critically examines the role of skepticism, the influence of the internet on disseminating conspiracy theories, and the tendency towards irrational beliefs.

The Nature of Skepticism and Anomalism

The publication begins by defining skepticism not as a rejection of the unknown, but as a critical approach to evaluating evidence. It contrasts this with 'anomalism,' which it suggests can lead to problems when one assumes a non-natural cause for unexplained phenomena without considering all possible natural factors. The article posits that allowing for supernatural explanations can hinder the search for natural ones, potentially leading to a 'proof of God' scenario. It quotes 'Konfusius' stating, "Scientists explain the unknown with the known, theologians the known with the unknown – the latter makes the world itself unknown and us strangers."

The Internet as a Rumor Mill

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to the internet's role in spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories. Citing a dpa-Meldung by Tobias Schormann, the article describes the internet as a "huge dung heap" and a "rumor mill" where UFO alarms, secret societies, and doomsday predictions can be found. Frank Ziemann of TU Berlin notes that the internet is a playground for conspiracy theorists and doomsayers. The article highlights how urban legends, such as alleged HIV infections at discos or asbestos in tampons, spread rapidly. Stephan Ehlert of hoaxbusters.de points out that these hoaxes are no longer just jokes and can cause real damage by eroding the credibility of the web community.

Following the 9/11 attacks, conspiracy theories have surged online. Claims include that hijacked planes were CIA-controlled and that the attacks fulfilled Nostradamus's prophecies. Classic conspiracy theories, like those surrounding 'Area 51' and alleged alien laboratories, persist. The article also mentions the debunked theory that the moon landing was faked in a studio, noting that while critical observers can spot fakes, the gullible are easily deceived.

Professor Hans-Jürgen Krysmanski of the University of Münster researches this topic, stating that conspiracy theories have always existed but are now spreading more rapidly due to the internet. He explains that in today's globalized world, conspiratorial legends are seductive because they offer simple answers to complex questions. Krysmanski believes that the desire to understand the world's inner workings is a universal human longing, and that conspiracy theories tap into this by suggesting hidden elites control events. The myth of the Illuminati, founded in the 18th century, is experiencing a comeback online.

Legal and Social Implications of Conspiracy Theories

The article touches upon the legal aspects, with lawyer Stephan Ackermann from Rostock noting that while incitement to hatred and insult of religious beliefs are punishable in Germany, enforcement can be difficult, especially when servers are located in the USA where such content may be considered free speech. Despite the prevalence of harmless conspiracy theories, the issue warns against those that promote antisemitism and factual distortion. Krysmanski advises that while one need not fear cyber-prophets, reading these modern legends can be entertaining if one does not believe them.

Ufology: Rationality vs. Fantastik

The publication then shifts focus to ufology, positioning UFO researchers as a "fighting force" against prevailing winds, contrasting them with commercialized figures who quickly abandon the field when profits dwindle. The article suggests that true research can be distinguished from mere business by observing the long-term commitment and behavior of individuals when the market becomes difficult. It implies that some "gurus" may be driven by sales strategies rather than genuine inquiry.

The core of the argument is that the reality of UFO phenomena is often more complex than the simplistic, often fantastical, explanations offered by ufologists. The article criticizes the tendency to reduce complex issues to a single, desired cause, such as "The aliens are here in flying saucers," as a way to explain away an "imperfect, official, and scientific world." This, it argues, is a form of escapism that makes the real world seem alien.

Many UFO sightings are presented as banal events that witnesses complicate by adhering to ufological narratives. Examples include mistaking a miniature hot air balloon for a UFO or misidentifying Venus in the sky. The article references the 1953 film "It Came from Outer Space" as an example of how alien encounters are framed, where a meteorite turns out to be an alien spacecraft.

The "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Effect" of Irrationality

The issue introduces the concept of the "Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde Effect" in the culture of irrationality. It suggests that humans tend to oversimplify complex situations, like the multi-causal nature of UFO reports, and reduce them to a single, fantastical explanation. This simplification serves to make the world understandable, but it also alienates individuals from real-world events, making them feel like "alien opponents" if they approach things rationally.

The article argues that the UFO phenomenon is often not examined on a rational level, but rather dominated by its enigmatic nature. Some actively promote this mystery to maintain their status. The "Sherlock Holmes" approach to UFO investigation is seen as disruptive and sometimes met with legal challenges. The author suggests that the entire phenomenon is part of a speculative worldview where new worlds are created.

Aliens are presented as placeholders for human desires and longings. The fantastical phenomena are described as parasites of philosophical constructs, a "secret cry for help" to the universe. The article notes that the genre mix of "fantastic and reality" appeals to specific individuals and is adapted to integrate with societal trends like conspiracy theories.

UFOlogy vs. Science Fiction

In science fiction (SF), the approach to the 'alien' is a thought experiment, understood as such by the audience. In ufology, however, the speculative handling of the fantastic is presented as absolute fact. This distinction, the article argues, is why UFOlogists and SF fans often do not interact. It points out the irony that many UFO skeptics are also astronomy enthusiasts.

The article notes how the entertainment industry has parodied the "UFO abduction theme," even featuring Bugs Bunny being abducted by Greys. It also mentions the ALF character being captured by the military in a film, reversing the typical alien-capture narrative. The film "Men in Black" is cited as a parody of alien sagas, and "ID4" is mentioned for its take on UFO paranoia.

The Decline of Public UFO Interest and the Commercialization of Ufology

The issue suggests that the public's interest in UFOs has waned, leading to hardcore ufologists having less media presence. The author believes that the UFO theme has been exhausted, with all variations played out. The core themes promoted by commercial ufologists are described as "fashion trends" rather than genuine tradition, likening it to "worshipping the ashes" instead of passing on the "fire."

The article criticizes the "deconstruction of saucer iconography" as a superficial change that keeps the UFO belief system alive. It mentions the shift from "saucers" to "flying triangles" as an example of this superficial evolution. The author also notes that the concept of "Greys" as superior beings, with large heads and slender bodies, originated from films like "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" and has become a trope.

The Human Need for the Irrational

The publication argues that humans have a tendency to simplify complex issues and reduce them to a single cause, often a fantastical one, to make the world understandable. This is seen as a way to cope with the "imperfect, official, and scientific world" and a form of escapism. The article posits that the UFO phenomenon is often not examined rationally but is dominated by its enigmatic nature, which some actively promote.

Aliens are seen as symbolic representations of human desires. The article suggests that the rational approach has little chance in the realm of ufology, which it identifies as a problem. While acknowledging that people love mysteries, it argues that clinging to them can be a way to avoid confronting reality. The article criticizes the tendency to dismiss rational explanations and to become angry when confronted with them.

Historical UFO Myths and Debunking

The issue revisits historical UFO myths, such as H. Percy Wilkins's 1953 claim of a "giant artificial bridge" on the Moon, which was later debunked by astronomer Donald Menzel. The article notes how such myths are perpetuated and how new ones emerge, like those concerning "Aliens on the Moon" and subsequently "Aliens on Mars."

The "Market" for UFOs and the Role of Promoters

The article criticizes the commercialization of ufology, where promoters sell "ufological expertise" based on half-truths and ignorance. It describes a "secret war" between serious UFO investigators and those who promote the fantastic. The author suggests that many UFO enthusiasts are repeatedly exploited by promoters who offer "cool as ice" products to reinforce their "strength of belief."

The publication argues that the "second epoch" of ufology has arrived, where the public is less willing to support these narratives through product purchases. It notes that purchasing decisions are often influenced by "impulse buying" driven by specific stimuli from sellers. CENAP itself is mentioned as having contributed to this by fostering the idea that competencies complement each other.

The Enduring Fascination with the Sky

Historically, the observation and interpretation of celestial phenomena were intertwined. Astrology is mentioned as an example where the interpretation of celestial signs is problematic, with uncertainty about the existence of such signs and the validity of their interpretations. The article likens mental expeditions through time and space to a "Rohrschach inkblot test," where people see "alien structures" in images of the Moon or Mars, referencing the "Face on Mars."

The article concludes that as long as people claim to have seen UFOs, stories about aliens will persist, regardless of whether they depict invasions or integrations. These narratives reflect how humans see themselves or wish to see themselves. The research into UFO phenomena is not just about knowing what others believe, but about understanding what is truly happening.

The Problem of Incomplete Knowledge

The issue reiterates the fundamental problem in the UFO debate: people often know only half the story, or nothing at all. This leads to a cycle of errors and repeated patterns among "UFO researchers" due to a lack of a proper "UFO researcher psychology." The article suggests that clear words are rare because the UFO field is filled with "crazy stories" that market leaders allow to persist for their own interests. The fantastic is the market, and promoters have become "winners" by perpetuating this.

Conclusion

The article suggests that the UFO phenomenon is a complex interplay of human psychology, the desire for mystery, the influence of media and the internet, and the commercialization of fringe topics. It advocates for a rational, evidence-based approach while acknowledging the enduring human fascination with the unknown and the fantastical.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of CENAP Newsflash include a strong emphasis on critical thinking and skepticism towards paranormal claims, particularly UFOs. The publication highlights the dangers of misinformation and conspiracy theories, especially as amplified by the internet. It contrasts the scientific method with the speculative and often commercialized approach of ufology. The editorial stance is clearly in favor of rational explanations and scientific inquiry, while acknowledging the human psychological need for mystery and wonder. The magazine appears to aim at deconstructing popular myths and encouraging a more grounded understanding of unexplained phenomena.