CENAP Infoline - no 023

Magazine Overview

This issue of cenap-infoline nr. 23, dated August 2, 1995, delves into the contentious world of UFO research and belief, critically examining organizations and alleged evidence. The central theme revolves around the perceived loss of reality among some UFO proponents and the defense of their 'idols' against skeptical scrutiny.

Deguforum and the Defense of Idols, or Loss of Reality Sense

The lead article critiques the Deguforum's stance, particularly referencing a report in Deguforum 6/95. It accuses Herr Heyer of denying the existence of UFOs while simultaneously claiming to defend 'actually existing UFOs,' suggesting this is a form of reader manipulation. The author questions the evidence presented by MUFON-CES, dismissing it as 'computer games' and 'ufologist fairy tales,' and contrasts this with the supposed rigorous research of skeptical organizations like GWUP, GEP, and CENAP. The article implies that MUFON-CES is more interested in self-serving manipulation than in scientific truth, even going so far as to suggest they 'dance with the devil' to maintain their facade of scientific legitimacy.

The 'Alien Autopsy' Film: A Case Study in Doubt

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the controversial 16-millimeter film purportedly showing an alien autopsy, acquired by British filmmaker Ray Santilli. The film, allegedly shot in July 1947 near Fort Worth, Texas, by a former US Air Force cameraman named Jack Barnett, is presented as potentially the most significant document of human history if authentic. Santilli claims to have purchased the film for a substantial sum, with Barnett demanding anonymity due to fear of repercussions from the military, tax authorities, or public attention. The film's authenticity is questioned due to the lack of a verifiable Jack Barnett in US Air Force records from 1947. Kodak's analysis of the film stock indicated it could be from 1927, 1947, or 1967, a result Santilli considers a partial victory because 1947 is considered the 'year of Roswell.'

Dr. Paul O'Higgins from University College, London, expresses skepticism, questioning the ease with which such a significant event could be documented and then seemingly dismissed. The article highlights the 'Roswell Incident' of July 1947 as a pivotal event for UFO enthusiasts, where initial reports of a crashed 'flying disc' were later retracted and explained as a weather balloon. The film's details, including the proportions and features of the alleged alien body, are described, along with the surgical procedures depicted, which English pathologists reportedly confirmed as technically consistent with 1947 standards.

Media Frenzy and UFOlogy

The 'Alien Autopsy' film has generated considerable media attention, with Santilli selling excerpts to TV stations for broadcast. The article notes the pressure from TV companies to present the cameraman, Jack Barnett, as a witness. Santilli's claim of purchasing the film for $150,000 is mentioned, along with his need for a partner to finance the venture. The potential for millions in profit is highlighted, but the risk of TV stations backing out if Barnett remains unpresented is also noted. The article also touches upon the burgeoning online UFO community, where the film is a subject of intense debate, with some ufologists believing it's a deliberate attempt to discredit the UFO movement.

Shifting Perceptions of Aliens

The magazine contrasts the portrayal of aliens in popular culture, noting a shift from the friendly, childlike alien like E.T. from the 1980s to the more menacing and malevolent aliens of the 1990s. These modern aliens are depicted as abducting humans, performing invasive experiments, and causing widespread fear. The article suggests that this darker portrayal of aliens is more commercially viable, with 'evil aliens selling better.'

UFO Sightings and Encounters

The issue also reports on recent UFO activity. A specific incident involves an Aerolineas Argentinas Boeing 727 experiencing a close encounter with a UFO exhibiting green and orange lights near San Carlos de Bariloche, Argentina. The pilot had to take evasive action, and the event reportedly caused instrument malfunctions and a power outage in the city. The article also mentions that the US Air Force is preparing a final report on the Roswell incident, possibly in response to public pressure and the ongoing media attention surrounding the 'Alien Autopsy' film.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims within the UFO community, the role of media in shaping public perception, and the critical examination of evidence. The magazine appears to adopt a stance that favors rigorous scientific investigation and questions sensationalist or manipulative presentations of alleged UFO phenomena. There is a clear distinction drawn between genuine research and what the authors perceive as 'ufologist fairy tales' and attempts to create 'idols' rather than pursue objective truth. The editorial stance is critical of organizations that prioritize belief over verifiable evidence and highlights the potential for fraud and manipulation within the field.