Busqueda Boletin - No 80

Magazine Overview

Title: BÚSQUEDA
Issue: 80
Date: March 1, 1995
Publisher: BÚSQUEDA E INVESTIGACIÓN DE LOS TEMAS: O.V.N.I. Y PARAPSICOLOGÍA
Country: Spain
Language: Spanish

This issue, number 80, marks the final publication of the magazine BÚSQUEDA, as announced by the publisher in a farewell message. The magazine focuses on UFOs and parapsychology.

Farewell Message

The publisher announces that this is the last issue of BÚSQUEDA. The reason cited is an offer of incentivized early retirement from their employer, which they have accepted. While acknowledging that this may leave them somewhat weakened economically, they plan to relocate to Jumilla (Murcia) and will attempt to re-establish contact with readers from there to continue "La Búsqueda" in a new capacity. The publisher expresses gratitude for the readers' disinterested collaboration, friendship, and support, without which the magazine would not have been possible.

Articles and Commentary

"¿ESTÁN LOS INVESTIGADORES OVNI VIGILADOS? UNAS BREVES (Y TRISTES REFLEXIONES) ACLARACIONES" by Bruno Cardeñosa

Bruno Cardeñosa addresses reactions to his previous report on the alleged surveillance of UFO investigators. He defends his position, referencing Juan José Benítez's earlier work from 1983 that expressed similar ideas. Cardeñosa notes that while Benítez's statements were accepted, his own, made 12 years later, have been met with criticism, with some labeling him as arrogant or delusional. He questions whether one needs to be an established figure to express significant ideas, drawing parallels to figures like Oscar Wilde and Einstein. He also recounts an anecdote about an ETA terrorist plot foiled by chance, suggesting that such 'coincidences' might not be random, and questions if he is considered delusional for thinking so.

"COMENTARIO SEMI-UFOLOGICO" by J.Mª Semitiel

J.Mª Semitiel responds to Bruno Cardeñosa's article, clarifying that his previous comments in the "Consultorio Semi-Ufológico" were not directed against Cardeñosa personally but against the ideas presented by J.J. Benítez regarding extraterrestrial control over UFO investigators. Semitiel expresses respect for Benítez but disagrees with the notion of exhaustive control, stating he does not believe in it. He emphasizes that his opinion was expressed in Búsqueda and by someone considered 'one more' voice, not intending to provoke offense. Semitiel also defends Cardeñosa against potential criticisms of being arrogant or megalomaniacal, stating he respects Cardeñosa's work and considers him a reputable field investigator.

"CIENTÍFICOS ENCABEZADOS POR CARL SAGAN CRITICAN QUE CADA VEZ MÁS GENTE CREA HABER SIDO SECUESTRADA POR ALIENÍGENAS"

This section highlights concerns from prominent scientists, including Carl Sagan, about the public's lack of scientific literacy and the rise of pseudoscientific beliefs like alien abductions. Sagan laments that a significant percentage of adults do not understand basic astronomical facts and that astrology receives more daily coverage than science. Philip J. Klass and Elizabeth Loftus also voice concerns about the unreliability of recovered memories through hypnosis, with Loftus noting that hypnotherapists can lead clients to believe in experiences that never occurred. John Mack, a psychiatrist, claims 90% of his patients have been abducted, a claim that journalist Donna Bassett, after undergoing a similar treatment, described as lacking critical sense and scientific method.

"LA FUERZA AÉREA AMERICANA DICE TENER RESUELTO EL CASO ROSIWELL"

This brief report states that the US Air Force claims to have solved the Roswell incident, explaining it as a meteorological balloon from the secret 'Mogul' program, designed to detect Soviet tests. This explanation was kept secret until now to avoid revealing the program.

"UN OMNI ATERRIZA EN URUGUAY Y DEJA UNA MARCA EN LA CALLE"

A UFO reportedly landed in the town of Cebollati, Uruguay, leaving a mark on the street. Witnesses in other areas also reported seeing a luminous flying object.

"ABDUCCIÓN EN HUESCA"

María Vega Orive from Jaca, Huesca, recounts an experience that she believes was an abduction. After a long drive, she felt discomfort and recalled images of herself on a table with beings manipulating her. Upon examination, she found a small puncture mark and bruise on her abdomen. Hypnosis sessions suggested the possibility of a paranormal event or abduction, with the therapist noting the mix of subconscious elements and potential fabrication due to her interest in UFO topics.

"MAS ALLA DE UNA DUDA" by Ramón Oroz Cia

This opinion piece discusses the difficulty of addressing the UFO phenomenon without controversy. The author criticizes skeptics for confusing denial with doubt and visionaries with angels. He argues that systematically denying the phenomenon is easier than proving its reality. The author touches upon the limitations of scientific methods in studying UFOs, suggesting they operate on different principles. He criticizes astrophysicist Javier E. Armentia for denying the phenomenon without thorough investigation. The article also references the Manises incident and the declassification of military information, questioning explanations like 'Venus' sightings and suggesting a military code of silence. The author concludes that UFOs are not mere tricks of light or balloons and that acknowledging potential intelligent visitation challenges established social structures.

"COMENTARIOS AL ARTICULO: ABDUCCION: ¿MIEDO A QUE?" by Pedro P. Canto

Pedro P. Canto responds to a commentary by Próspera Muñoz regarding his article on abductions. Canto apologizes for any confusion between the terms 'Visitors' and 'Abduction' in his previous work, attributing it to a potential over-reliance on American sources. He clarifies that the term 'Abducciones Nocturnas' is used in North America and that the manuscript Muñoz referenced was a translation. Canto defends his research, stating he has interviewed numerous abductees and that their experiences, while varied, often lead to profound life changes and mystical inclinations. He also addresses Muñoz's claim that he doesn't know abductees in depth, listing several prominent investigators who have visited her. Canto suggests that such discussions should be private rather than published in the magazine, but acknowledges that Muñoz's commentary has brought attention to the issue.

"CONCHALÍ, A LA PALESTRA - II" by Raúl Núñez

This article revisits the UFO sightings reported in the Cerros de Huechuraba, Chile. Investigators Rodrigo Fuenzalida, Gustavo Rodríguez, and Luis Riquelme investigated the claims made by Oswaldo Murray. They found that the reported lights were static and of normal halogen tone, appearing terrestrial. They also investigated alleged ground marks, concluding they were unrelated to the lights and possibly caused by military activity or hunters. The investigators found that the photos presented by Murray were likely of car headlights on a distant highway. They concluded that Murray's claims of anomalies were not supported by evidence, suggesting that his strong conviction might stem from personal circumstances, such as financial difficulties, which may have influenced his reporting.

"EL SENDERO DE LA ADIVINACIÓN" by Conrado Rodriguez

This multi-part series explores the concept of 'divination' as a process of 'reading the future.' Rodriguez defines it as the conscious mind gaining knowledge of material events in different space-temporal moments and interpreting them. He posits that divination involves tuning into a higher plane to access information and then recalling it. The author discusses the limitations of this process, suggesting that true understanding requires moving beyond the 'inferior world' of Malkuth and that interpretation is subjective. He touches upon parapsychology and occultism, distinguishing between those who seek knowledge for control and mystics who seek it for self-transcendence. Rodriguez emphasizes that true 'diviners' seek a path towards divinity, not just future predictions, and warns against getting lost in mere phenomena or pseudoscientific practices.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores UFO phenomena, abductions, and related parapsychological topics. There is a clear stance of open investigation, though the articles also engage with skepticism and critical analysis. The farewell issue reflects on the challenges and controversies within the ufology community, highlighting differing opinions among investigators and the public's susceptibility to unsubstantiated claims. The editorial stance appears to be one of seeking truth through investigation while acknowledging the complexities and subjective nature of the phenomena discussed.