Bulletin d'Information Ufologique - Vol 1 No 2 - dec 1984

Magazine Overview

Title: BULLETIN D'INFORMATION UFOLOGIQUE

Issue: VOLUME 1, NUMÉRO 2

Date: December 1984

Publisher: CCOI

Country of Publication: Canada

Original Language: French

This issue of the Bulletin d'Information Ufologique (BIUFO) is dedicated to exploring the field of ufology, with a particular emphasis on Quebec-based research and authors. The editorial by Marc Leduc sets a critical tone, urging readers to exercise discernment when encountering the vast and varied literature on the subject, acknowledging that some authors are more rigorous than others. He highlights the importance of responsible reporting and verification, especially in light of media amplification of unverified stories.

Key Articles and Reports

Rapport d'Enquête: Route 20

This section details an investigation by André Michaud, with illustrations by Daniel Lalonde, into a sighting that occurred on February 1, 1980, near St.-Hyacinthe and Ste.-Rosalie, Quebec. The witnesses, Johanne and Lucien Beauregard, reported observing a nocturnal light that initially appeared as a red light, then a bright white light. The object exhibited unusual movements, including zigzagging across Route 20, a sudden ascent of approximately 15 meters, and a slow, descending movement towards their vehicle. The object then projected a flash of light, causing the witnesses to flee. The investigation noted the object's estimated size of 30 to 60 meters in diameter and the absence of any audible sound. The report also mentions the possibility of aircraft in the area but questions their ability to produce the observed luminous effects.

L'objet

Further details are provided about the object's appearance, described as distinctly opaque with a very dark center. The upper part had a flashing red light, while the lower part displayed a larger, bright white light. The report estimates the object's diameter to be between 30 and 60 meters, noting that the darkness of the surroundings and the brightness of the lights made precise measurements difficult. The investigators assigned an 'étrangeté' (strangeness) index of 5 points due to the silence, size, movements, flash effect, and general appearance. The probability index, reflecting the reliability of the witnesses' report, was rated at 4 points due to the internal coherence of the narrative and the promptness of the investigation.

Commentaires

This section discusses potential explanations and contextual factors. It notes the presence of a high-tension electricity line near the observation site and the flat, open terrain near the fromagerie where the object reportedly descended. The witnesses experienced a strong sense of anxiety following the event and remained convinced they had observed a singular phenomenon. Investigations on-site did not reveal any physical traces. The report also speculates about small, personal aircraft in the region, but questions whether they could account for the observed phenomena.

Opinion Sur: Les auteurs québécois

Authored by Marc Leduc, this section provides a comprehensive review of Quebec ufologists and their publications. It lists books chronologically, starting with Henri Bordeleau's "J'ai VU des soucoupes volantes" (1966) and continuing through works by Jean Casault, Jean Ferguson, Claude Macduff, Pierre Couillard, Jean-Pierre Gauthier, Réginald Marquis, Jean Vézina, and François Bourbeau. Leduc praises Bordeleau as a pioneer whose books are mandatory reading for Quebec ufology enthusiasts, despite Bordeleau's hypothesis that aliens seek salt from Earth. He describes Casault's "Manifeste pour l'avenir" as low-quality journalism but finds his "Dossier ovni" to be better structured. Ferguson's books are also recommended for their engaging style and controversial themes. Macduff's "Le procès des soucoupes volantes" is noted for its originality. Couillard's book is described as a rigorous documentary work. Gauthier's work is praised for its documentary value, stemming from his involvement in an UFO film. Marquis is highlighted as a serious ufologist whose books are also considered essential reading. The section also discusses the work of Vézina and Leduc on 'orthoteny', noting that while the 1954 French wave might be considered invalid, the principle itself is not refuted. Bourbeau's book, "Contact 158," is critiqued for relying heavily on hypnosis, which is considered fragile evidence in ufology.

Informations Internationales

This section briefly mentions Maurice G. de San from Belgium, who researches UFO origins and propulsion. It also reports on the fifth congress of the CPDV (Centro para Pesquisas de Discos Voadores) in Brazil, which attracted over 700 people. Geneviève Vanquelef, author of "OVNI INTERVENTIONS CAPTURES," is also mentioned, with her work summarizing close encounters of the third kind. The section notes her slight bitterness that her sources proved unreliable.

RR3 A RAYER DU FICHIER

This segment addresses a widely reported incident from July 23, 1982, in Ste.-Dorothée, Quebec, involving a flying saucer and a humanoid. The report notes that the story was exaggerated by the media, including "La Presse" and "Le Provencal." The article presents findings from two distinct UFO groups, De Koninck and Parent, and the CRAS (Centre de Recherche et d'Analyse des Phénomènes Spatiaux). Both investigations raised concerns about the handling of the case, including potential contamination of evidence (plastering traces) and the influence of external groups like CEPET, which may have sought publicity. The CRAS report suggests that alleged 'paw' prints were likely human finger imprints and that plant bending was not particularly significant.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of UFO phenomena, the importance of rigorous investigation, and the evaluation of ufological literature. The editorial stance, particularly from Marc Leduc, is one of cautious skepticism and a call for responsible reporting and analysis. The magazine aims to provide readers with information and tools to critically assess UFO claims, distinguishing between well-documented cases and speculative or sensationalized accounts. There is a clear emphasis on promoting Quebec ufology while also acknowledging international contributions and research.

Title: Bulletin d'Information Ufologique
Issue: V.1, N.2
Publisher: Corporation pour la Collection des Observations Inexpliquées (CCOI)
Country: Canada
Language: French
Date: 1983 (inferred from context and graph data)

This issue of the Bulletin d'Information Ufologique (BIUFO) focuses on ufological activity in Canada, featuring an analysis of reports collected by the National Research Council of Canada (CNRC) and a specific case investigated by CRAS.

CRAS Investigation

The article begins with a report concerning CRAS (Centre de Recherche et d'Analyse des Phénomènes Aériens Spatiaux, inferred) visiting observers on September 25th. The observers' initial account was reportedly unpolished. Subsequently, on September 31st, De Koninck interviewed them again. The witnesses had rehearsed their story to such an extent that De Koninck was able to observe them recounting it on a television broadcast of a recorded program. The four investigators expressed significant doubts regarding the observation of humanoids, proposing that an 'orignal' (moose) might be the origin of the sighting. They even doubted the UFO observation itself.

CNRC Reports Analysis

An article by Richard Bastien details his regular contact with the National Research Council of Canada (CNRC) to gather information on ufological activity based on their non-meteorological observation reports. Bastien has collected data from approximately 3,000 reports contained within the CNRC's extensive files since 1965. However, he notes that the subject has been neglected by the CNRC, which primarily files the reports without conducting thorough investigations. The article points out that investigations are sometimes carried out by the National Defence, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), and various provincial and municipal police forces. Additionally, letters and direct telephone calls from witnesses are forwarded to the CNRC, but in these cases, no investigation is conducted with the witnesses.

A graph is included, representing the distribution of reports received by the CNRC from 1965 to 1982. Bastien states that his statistical attempts to identify any non-seasonal periodicity in this chronological series have been unsuccessful. The graph visually depicts fluctuations in the number of reports over these years, with peaks and valleys but no immediately obvious pattern.

Publication Information and Policies

The magazine is a quarterly publication of the CCOI. Subscription details are provided: 12$ for Canada and the United States, and 15$ for other countries, with checks and postal money orders payable to CCOI. The BIUFO is also available for exchange with other publications of a similar nature. Contact telephone numbers are listed for Rougemont, Montréal, Rive Sud, and Gatineau. The CCOI accepts submissions of texts, articles, drawings, photos, letters, and observation reports.

The publication's responsibility clause states that collaborators and authors are responsible for their writings, which do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the editorial staff or the CCOI. The CCOI will authorize reproduction of BIUFO texts upon request, requiring communication with the bulletin's editorial office.

Legal deposit information indicates that BIUFO is deposited at the National Library of Canada (ISBN ISSN 267832) and the National Library of Quebec.

The CCOI also publishes a 'Lettre d'Information Ufologique' (LIUFO), a newsletter dedicated to collaborators and supporters of the corporation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the collection, analysis, and investigation of UFO reports in Canada. There is a critical stance towards the CNRC's handling of these reports, suggesting a lack of thorough investigation and a general neglect of the subject. The editorial stance appears to be one of diligent data collection and a desire for more systematic analysis, while also acknowledging the challenges and limitations in obtaining comprehensive investigative data from official sources. The issue highlights the importance of witness accounts and the potential for misidentification of phenomena.