BUFORA Bulletin - No 12 - Feb 1984

Magazine Overview

Title: BUFORA BULLETIN
Issue: No 12
Date: February 1984
Publisher: BUFORA LTD
Country: United Kingdom
Document Type: Magazine Issue

This issue of the BUFORA Bulletin, dated February 1984, focuses heavily on UFO phenomena, government involvement, and specific case studies, most notably the Rendlesham Forest incident. It also provides updates on the organization's internal affairs and council activities.

BUFORA News and Organization Updates

The issue begins with a listing of the BUFORA Council for 1983-84, including President Lord Kings Norton, Vice-Presidents, Council Chairman Robert S. Digby, and various council members, secretaries, and directors. It details the roles of the Director of Publications and Editor (John E. Barrett), Public Relations Officer (Lionel E. Beer), Librarian (Robin Lindsey), Director of Research (Stephen Gamble), and Director of Investigations (Miss Jenny Randles).

Miss Diane Rollison serves as the Secretary to the Council, and Miss Pam Kennedy is the Membership Secretary. Hans Streuli, the Treasurer for the past year, resigned on December 10th, with his successor to be appointed in February 1984. His resignation stemmed from personality clashes on Council, but he will remain involved in inviting speakers and planning future events.

The report on the December Council Meeting and AGM notes discussions about forming small ad hoc committees for day-to-day operations due to the infrequency of bi-monthly Council meetings. Ken Phillips was proposed to be co-opted onto the Council with responsibility for training, focusing initially on basic UFO research skills.

The AGM saw the election of two new Council members: Diane Rollison and Robin Lindsey, both recognized for their loyal service. The 1982 accounts were unaudited, with a special EGM planned for later in the year to pass audited accounts. The AGM was followed by a well-attended lecture by Jenny Randles et al on the Rendlesham Forest mystery.

BUFORA's financial and administrative affairs are being weathered, with the Association acknowledging a decline in membership and interest, but expressing gratitude to loyal supporters.

Timothy Good Lecture: US Intelligence Agencies and UFOs

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to a lecture given by Timothy Good on November 10th, 1983, at the London Business School, titled "US Intelligence Agencies and UFOs." Good, a professional musician, lecturer, and writer on UFOs, and an advisor to the House of Lords All Party UFO Study Group, challenged the notion that governments were not interested in UFOs.

He cited the 1942 Los Angeles sighting, where US intelligence initially suspected a Japanese air attack, and military action was taken against the objects. He also mentioned the mid-to-late 1940s "foo fighters" and "ghost rockets," which led both American and German governments to form committees to investigate. Scientists from the Pentagon reportedly halted a Greek investigation into objects that were not military missiles.

J. Edgar Hoover, Head of the FBI, is noted to have demanded, via a secret memo, all information regarding UFOs. This memo circulated around the time of the alleged 1947 Roswell crash, with debris reportedly taken to Wright Patterson air force base, and the military subsequently denying the FBI access.

Good highlighted that many intelligence documents shown often contained extensive erasures, with only basic conjunctions remaining, suggesting a deliberate attempt to obscure information.

He discussed the opinion of US military intelligence post the 1947 Arnold sighting, which concluded that UFOs existed. The incident involving pilot Thomas Mantell in January 1948, who died chasing a UFO, was investigated by Air Technical Services.

The early 1950s, particularly 1952, are described as the "golden age" of UFO sightings. The CIA and other intelligence agencies were constantly monitoring. A 1950 report mentioned another crashed UFO in New Mexico, and a rash of sightings occurred over atomic plants in July of that year.

Following the July 1952 "flap" above Washington DC, the US Air Force held its longest press conference, admitting that "20 per cent of the sightings could not be explained." A confidential US Air Force Academy manual admitted that in the summer of 1952, US Sabre jets fired on a saucer-shaped object at 3000ft, which then vanished.

Good also pointed to the UFO group NICAP, founded by Major Donald Keyhoe, suggesting it was subjected to infiltration by the CIA. He mentioned retrieval events occurring not only at Roswell but also at Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, in May 1953.

An update on the Cash/Landrum encounter (December 1980) noted Betty Cash suing the US government for injuries sustained from an encounter with a fiery object, arguing that if the government denies UFO existence, the object must be terrestrial and thus their responsibility.

Declassified CIA documents revealed a massive wave of UFO sightings over nuclear sites in Michigan, Dakota, Wyoming, and Nebraska during the 1970s. A UFO/F-4 jet fighter encounter over Teheran in September 1976 was also detailed. Out of 10,000 classified UFO documents held by the CIA, only 1000 had been released.

Good also described the National Security Agency (NSA), founded in 1952, as a formidable entity with extensive resources and interests in signals, coding, cryptology, and bugging devices. The NSA held 137 UFO documents but refused to reveal their contents, a stance upheld by a US court ruling.

The Rendlesham Forest Incident

The issue dedicates significant attention to the Rendlesham Forest incident of December 1980. A lecture by Jenny Randles, along with investigators Mrs Dot Street and Mrs Brenda Butler, and science correspondent Ian Ridpath, explored the events. Manchester solicitor Harry Harris also contributed.

Jenny Randles outlined the initial story from the BUFORA BULLETIN (May 1982) concerning a US Air Force officer's admission of a craft landing in Rendlesham Forest, with entities seen conversing with US Air Force officers. Radar tapes were reportedly confiscated by US military personnel.

An independent witness in America confirmed a number of radar-detected UFOs over the period. Investigations by Mrs Street and Mrs Butler uncovered a contact on the air force base who confirmed an object had landed and been radar-tracked.

Conflicting testimony emerged, with some stories suggesting the craft hovered and then flew away, while others indicated it was damaged and required repair. Physical evidence of damaged tree tops and radiation traces was reportedly found.

Jenny Randles approached the case from a defense implications perspective, while Dot and Brenda focused on the local angle. The investigation faced stonewalling from the Ministry of Defence, which initially denied any unusual lights, but later admitted that unusual lights had been seen by military personnel on the perimeter on December 27th, 1980, with no explanation.

SCUFORI (Swindon Centre for UFO Research and Study) conducted a limited investigation in September 1982, concluding it was a "complete non-event," a verdict distressing to Dot and Brenda.

Later, "Art Wallace" (a pseudonym), a security guard at the nearby RAF Bentwaters base, provided testimony claiming he was called out to investigate a landing on December 27th. His evidence, however, is regarded as suspect by some investigators due to inconsistencies.

Colonel Holt's statement, obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, confirmed what had happened at Rendlesham. His letter to the "NEWS OF THE WORLD" described a red sun-like light seen through trees, which pulsed and broke into five white objects, followed by three star-like objects moving rapidly with colored lights. Some objects appeared elliptical and remained in the sky for an hour or more, while another beamed down a stream of light.

A discrepancy in dates was noted, with some reports citing December 27th, 1980, and others December 30th. The confusion over dates is highlighted as a point that anti-ufologists use to question the phenomenon's veracity.

"Art Wallace's" story is noted to contradict other witnesses, particularly regarding the date. The investigative work of Jenny, Dot, and Brenda is described as difficult due to conflicting accounts.

An important point raised was the prominence given to the "crashed UFO and aliens" story over that of a crashed missile or aircraft. The article suggests that the Ministry of Defence might prefer to support a ufological story rather than admit to a secret military missile test. The Cash/Landrum encounter is cited as another example where military involvement might be present.

Dot and Brenda showed a film illustrating anomalies, and the alleged landing site had been dug up and older trees removed by the summer of 1983. The existence of an underground site housing a retrieved UFO, as claimed by "Art Wallace," is presented with skepticism but also with the question of whether he could be lying.

Book Reviews and Letters

The issue includes a "Book Reviews" section and "Letters To The Editor," indicating reader engagement and critical analysis of UFO-related literature.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are government secrecy surrounding UFO phenomena, the challenges of UFO investigation, the credibility of witness testimony, and the potential for military involvement in unexplained aerial events. The editorial stance appears to be one of encouraging scientific, unbiased research while acknowledging the difficulties and complexities involved in investigating such cases. There is a clear effort to present multiple perspectives and to critically analyze evidence, as seen in the discussion of the Rendlesham Forest incident and the conflicting testimonies.

Title: BUFORA Bulletin
Issue: 18
Volume: 18
Date: 1984
Publisher: BUFORA
Country: United Kingdom
Price: £1.50
ISSN: 0264-5026

This issue of the BUFORA Bulletin delves into two significant UFO-related topics: the controversial Rendlesham Forest incident and extensive reports from Norway concerning UFO activity in Arendal and Hessdalen.

Rendlesham Forest Incident Discussion

The issue opens with a detailed account of a discussion regarding the Rendlesham Forest incident. Solicitor Harry Harris, after evaluating witness testimony, concluded that a UFO had landed, though he refused to divulge his sources due to confidentiality. Keith Beebey, a reporter from 'News of the World' who investigated the case, stated he was convinced of the story's truth after his research. In contrast, Ian Ridpath, Assistant Director of the Meteor Section at the British Astronomical Society, presented a more skeptical view. Ridpath suggested alternative explanations, including a meteor sighting on the night of December 26th-27th, described as 'bright as the moon,' and the possibility that lights seen were from the Orford Ness lighthouse. He also noted that physical traces found, such as elliptical marks and tree scoring, were attributed to mundane causes like rabbit scrapings and timber marking.

Ridpath further critiqued the case by pointing out four specific issues: the lack of a control sample for radiation counts, the misidentification of lights as stars, the lack of interception attempts if a space craft was suspected, and the strong likelihood that the object witnessed was a meteor combined with misinterpretation and human error.

Despite the conflicting viewpoints, the meeting did not resolve the case, but it presented the evidence and allowed involved parties to state their positions. The editorial stance suggests that dismissing the possibility of a UFO landing based on the meteor explanation is ludicrous given the credibility of the witnesses, including high-ranking air force officers.

UFO Congress Announcement

A brief announcement for a UFO Congress to be held at Mellerup Centre, Denmark, from July 21st to 27th, 1984, is included. It lists speakers from Sweden, Germany, and the UK, and provides contact details for Lars K. Lassen in Denmark.

The Arendal and Hessdalen Sightings - Norway

The main body of the issue is dedicated to a two-part paper detailing widespread UFO activity in the Norwegian towns of Arendal and Hessdalen, which began in November 1981 and was ongoing. The paper is based on talks and edited versions of publications from UFO Norway.

UFOs at Arendal

In early November 1981, a Norwegian family reported seeing UFOs night after night. Hans Aass of UFO Norway was contacted. On November 8th, the family observed lights from the sea, described as flashing with a bluish, quivering light that varied in intensity and color. The object later returned, appearing closer and clearly visible, with a dome lit from within and a row of square-like 'windows' beneath. A circular or oval body was below that, with rotating red, green, and blue lights. A cone of light was seen tapering from its underside.

Mr. Aass also witnessed UFOs and noted other sightings of small lights dancing in the sky with violent bursts of colored lights. On November 9th, Harald Faernes and his wife observed a UFO emitting a powerful white light and moving in sharp angles. Three days later, four young men at Blakstad saw a UFO hovering silently with lights on its underside.

During this period, UFO Norway members took 63 photographs of UFOs, with some of the images showing cylindrical-shaped clouds possibly emitted from the UFO. The article notes that some photographs were excellent, revealing details that suggested charged particles or electromagnetic field manipulation.

On November 19th, 1981, a large cigar-shaped object was filmed near Arendal. Witnesses reported a blue light that blinked and pulsed, illuminating the surroundings. Later, a huge greyish object with red lights moved silently over a lake, appearing to be about 200-300 meters from the house. The object was described as having a bridge-like structure on top. Another cigar-shaped object was seen near the center of Arendal that same evening.

UFOs at Hessdalen

The Hessdalen Valley, located 130km from Trondheim, became a focal point for UFO activity starting in November 1981. The UFOs exhibited characteristics similar to those seen in Arendal, appearing between 19:30-20:00 hours, moving in gyrations above mountains at high speeds, or very slowly, remaining stationary, and moving east/west. Since December 1981, numerous bright lights, egg- or cigar-shaped objects, and projectile-shaped craft have been reported. Jon Aspaas, a witness, reported daylight sightings as early as 1943 and numerous times since.

UFO Norway members have investigated the Hessdalen area, noting that the UFOs often appear suddenly, move at high speeds, and disappear just as quickly. They can also move slowly, matching helicopter speeds. Records from Norway's Geological Institute indicate a strong earth-magnetic field in the areas where UFOs have been sighted, and some objects seemed to disappear where this field is strongest. The area also contains a large mining region, including a disused diamond mine.

Witness Testimony and Theories

A survey conducted at a meeting in Alen revealed that out of 130 people present, many had witnessed various phenomena: pulsating lights, globes of yellow light, cigar-shaped objects, egg-shaped objects, and daylight objects. Some reported television disturbances and effects on dogs. Several theories were put forward to explain the Hessdalen lights, including reflections from cold and warm air inversion, reflections from distant car lights, the planet Mars, or simply lies and hallucinations. UFO Norway members have researched these theories, finding no firm evidence to support them and noting that the phenomenon persists despite varying weather conditions.

Notable Sightings and Details

Lars Lillevold described seeing an egg-shaped or oblong object with a metallic centre and an orange bright light, surrounded by a soft, wool-like field. The object moved slowly down through the valley without sound. At Arendal, UFOs emitted a blue flash, while in Hessdalen, the flash was white. Witnesses reported pulsating red lights like globes, and objects shining like stars, sometimes turning a warm-yellow-red color. Sightings were sometimes accompanied by television interference, and in one case, a dog laid down and remained motionless.

Ongoing Research

Members of UFO Norway have camped in the mountains searching for tracks or physical traces, but a field detector has not recorded anything. The article concludes by stating that this 'test' was voluntary and that the investigation will continue in the next issue, focusing on photographs taken by UFO Norway.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the persistent nature of UFO sightings, the challenges in explaining them, and the contrast between official or skeptical explanations and the conviction of witnesses. The Rendlesham incident highlights the difficulty in definitively proving or disproving such events, while the Norwegian sightings emphasize the variety of reported phenomena and the ongoing efforts of dedicated researchers like UFO Norway. The editorial stance appears to favor a serious consideration of UFO reports, particularly when credible witnesses are involved, and expresses skepticism towards overly simplistic explanations that dismiss witness testimony outright.

This issue of a magazine, identified by page numbers and content, focuses on the topic of "Telepathic Communication with Extraterrestrials - Fact or Fiction?" authored by Manfred Cassirer. The publication appears to be a specialized journal or newsletter, likely focused on ufology and related parapsychological phenomena, given the content and the references cited.

Telepathic Communication with Extraterrestrials: Fact or Fiction?

Manfred Cassirer critically examines the concept of telepathic communication with UFOs and extraterrestrials. He argues that the terminology used, such as "thought-transference" or "mental telepathy," reveals a flawed understanding of ExtraSensory Perception (ESP). Cassirer points to George Adamski as a key figure in popularizing the idea of "telepathic extraterrestrials," but dismisses his claims due to his background and the lack of credible evidence. He highlights the limitations of ESP, noting that under laboratory conditions, messages are typically restricted to single words, and even then, the evidence is precarious. Cassirer asserts that the idea of ESP being a viable alternative to conventional communication, capable of conveying complex messages, is unfounded and propagated by pulp writers.

He discusses the work of researchers like Dr. C.B. Nash and Professor Ian Stevenson, who have studied psi communication. While acknowledging that psi communication might exist at a subconscious level, Cassirer is skeptical of its utility for complex dialogue. He cites Professor Stevenson's admission that instances of telepathic communication of foreign languages are "extremely rare" and "evidently weak." Dr. Louisa Rhine's research on telepathic rapport between mothers and children is also mentioned, but Cassirer cautions against invoking "telepathy" without understanding its limitations.

The article critiques the sensationalist reporting of alleged telepathic contacts, citing an example from "Paris Soir" about Soviets transmitting thoughts to space for contact with extraterrestrials. Cassirer notes that even "Pravda" denounced this as "stupid and disgusting."

Cassirer refutes the notion that aliens might possess superior telepathic abilities, attributing such assumptions to ignorance of parapsychological matters. He contrasts this with accounts from "Close Encounter" experiences where individuals felt spoken to without articulation. He references Celia Green's research on apparitions, noting their taciturn disposition and occasional reluctance to speak realistically, sometimes communicating "as if by telepathy."

He also touches upon Dr. Walter F. Prince's findings on spectral figures that seemed to speak without audible messages, conveying emotions like "reproach and pain." The article mentions extraordinary feats in poltergeist cases, where mentally directed questions were answered, sometimes in foreign languages. However, Cassirer suggests that these "messages" do not necessarily imply genuine communication, and that humanoids often make absurd claims or talk rubbish, leading Jacques Vallee to describe them as "Messengers of Deception."

BUFORA and the 'Guardian' Newspaper Incident

Jenny Randles contributes a section detailing a peculiar incident involving the "Waltham Forest Guardian" newspaper and the organization BUFORA (British UFO Research Association). The newspaper published a story claiming BUFORA had been disbanded and its coordinator, Mike Wootton, had "dematerialised." This stemmed from an initial report about a Mr. Arthur Noble who claimed to have seen UFOs. When Mike Wootton investigated, Mr. Noble denied writing the letter. Subsequently, a Mrs. J. Mould reported a similar sighting. The "Guardian" then published a piece accusing Wootton of "dirty tricks" and seeking to "cover up the truth." Mr. C.J. Snead, Chairman of the Woodford UFO Club, further claimed that his group had substantiated Mr. Noble's sighting and accused Wootton and BUFORA of not existing. Wootton, however, insisted BUFORA did exist and that he was a real coordinator.

The article recounts how Mike Wootton's investigation into Mr. Snead and his club yielded no results, with no trace of either found. The "Guardian" continued to report on the mystery, with a Mr. Bowie questioning the newspaper editor's existence. Mike Wootton made a public plea, "I'm here where are you?" to assert BUFORA's existence.

Mrs. Mould later reported seeing the UFO again. Mike Wootton investigated the possibility of a police helicopter being responsible, but received conflicting information. The incident left Wootton questioning his own existence.

The Freeway to American UFology

Jenny Randles recounts her experiences traveling to America for research related to UFOs. Her trip was funded by her publishers for a new book. She describes the initial prospect of traveling alone but was joined by Dot Street, an investigator for BUFORA, who was researching the Rendlesham Forest UFO case.

Their trip involved several fortunate occurrences, including a delay in the European Space Laboratory's launch, which allowed them to have a rest near Cape Canaveral. In Chicago, they met Allen and Mim Hynek, who hosted them and introduced them to a NASA shuttle astronaut. A significant event was a conference themed "The Cosmic Watergate," focusing on the US government and UFO cover-ups, where Allen Hynek and US police officer Larry Fawcett were speakers. Fawcett had obtained a memorandum from the British Ministry of Defence regarding the Rendlesham Forest affair.

Randles and Street were invited to the conference, with Randles agreeing to give a short paper and participate in media interviews. They expressed gratitude to Ray Boeche and MUFON colleagues for organizing the event, and the University of Lincoln, Nebraska, for financial support.

Randles details her flight to Chicago, the empty plane, and Dot's interviewing techniques. She humorously recounts Dot's interaction with the pilot and her own apprehension about the flight's safety. Upon arrival in Evanston, Illinois, they stayed with Allen and Mim Hynek. Randles notes that even the efficient Dr. Hynek's organization had data retrieval issues.

She describes the logical US street system, contrasting it with London's. However, upon arriving in Lincoln, Nebraska, they experienced difficulty finding their location due to the numbering system. Randles also recounts an experience in Denver, Colorado, where she easily found the Trailways depot using the street system.

Conference Experiences and Debunking

Randles describes the conference in Nebraska, which was well-organized and featured lectures by prominent figures like Hynek, Fawcett, John Scheusler, and Bud Hopkins. She highlights the value of private sessions where delegates discussed issues in depth, suggesting BUFORA adopt this practice.

John Scheusler presented on the Cash-Landrum case, where three people were allegedly burnt by a UFO and then confronted by unmarked helicopters. Randles notes the gruesome photos of a victim, suggesting they would be compelling evidence against skepticism.

During private sessions, attempts were made to elicit explanations from government sources. Bud Hopkins, an artist and author, is described positively. Randles mentions a CE4 case discussed by Hopkins, which involved thousands of rabbits hopping beside a UFO-haunted car.

Randles recounts the intense media attention at the conference, with journalists and television cameras surrounding her. She describes a particularly overwhelming moment during a question session when a cameraman, a microphone holder, and a man with an arc light rushed towards her.

She also addresses the "debunking" aspect of the conference, specifically mentioning Philip Klass, whom she describes as a "notorious US debunking machine." Randles states that "everybody I met" hated Klass, including Allen Hynek, despite his occasional truths.

UFology and the Philosophers

John Bostock, a member of BUFORA and Senior Pricing Officer at British Aerospace, discusses the relationship between ufology and philosophy. He notes that philosophers, like ufologists, have their peculiarities. Bostock suggests that fringe thought, including ufology, might be considered part of the rationalist's domain.

He explains the division between empiricists (who rely on senses and experience) and rationalists (who rely on reason). Bostock posits that empiricists are more common among English-speaking peoples, citing Locke and Berkeley, while rationalists are more represented by the continental school. He suggests that a ufologist who solely relies on skywatches might be too empirical, but that such activity can be beneficial for gaining knowledge.

Bostock introduces the concept of "singular rarities," emphasizing the importance of UFOs being truly rare phenomena to be of interest. He also touches upon "metaphysical licence," warning against it and recommending books like "Teach Yourself Philosophy" by C.E.M. Joad and "Teach Yourself The Philosophy of Religion" by H.D. Lewis.

References and Book Reviews

The issue includes a comprehensive list of references, citing various books and articles related to UFOs, parapsychology, apparitions, and poltergeists. This indicates a scholarly approach to the subject matter.

Two book reviews are featured:

1. "LET'S HOPE THEY'RE FRIENDLY": This book is recommended for its relevance to the New Zealand UFO events, which are described as important scientific evidence. The title is noted to apply equally to humans involved as to supposed extraterrestrials.
2. "THE EVIDENCE FOR UFOS" by Hilary Evans: This book is the first in a series published in association with ASSAP. It covers a wide range of UFO cases and theories, appealing to both newcomers and experienced readers. The review notes that the book briefly examines the history of UFOs and society's attitude towards them.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of claims of extraterrestrial communication, the scientific validity of parapsychological phenomena like telepathy, and the challenges of UFO investigation. There is a clear editorial stance against unsubstantiated claims and sensationalism, favoring a more evidence-based and skeptical approach, while still acknowledging the existence of unexplained phenomena. The articles highlight the difficulties in distinguishing between genuine sightings, misidentifications, hoaxes, and the role of skepticism and debunking in the field. The personal accounts of investigations and conference experiences add a narrative dimension, illustrating the passion and dedication of those involved in ufology.

This issue of the UFO NEWS BULLETIN, dated November 1983 (Volume 11, Issue 4), is published by BUFORA from the United Kingdom. It serves as a compilation of recent UFO reports, articles, and opinions from international sources, aiming to provide a comprehensive overview of the subject.

UFO News Round-Up

This section summarizes recent UFO reports and articles from the international press and UFO journals.

Flying Saucer Review

The December 1983 issue reported on a landing and close encounter case near Aldershot in August 1983, involving a 78-year-old fisherman who claimed abduction by two 4ft 6in beings. The October issue featured an article by editor Gordon Creighton on the "TRUE NATURE OF 'UFO ENTITIES'" and an encounter/abduction in Brazil in October 1979. Dr. Robert Jacobs, Assistant Professor of Radio-Film TV at the University of Wisconsin, claimed that on January 8, 1965, an Atlas F missile at Vandenburg Air Force base was approached by a UFO that emitted a vivid flash of light, causing the missile to malfunction and crash. Jacobs stated, "The UFOs are real. I know they're real. The Air Force knows they're real. And the US Government knows they're real." An Italian CE3 case from November 24, 1978, at Gastagh, Vicenza, described two unpleasant-looking creatures resembling "rat faced" beings. A postscript mentioned a UFO crash landing at Bahia Blanco, Argentina in 1950, and a UFO reportedly disabling a Soviet space station at Baikonour in June 1982.

More Landings?

The May 1983 issue of AUSTRALIAN INTERNATIONAL UFO FLYING SAUCER RESEARCH reported an alleged crashed UFO in the remote Cape York peninsula area of North Queensland on May 9, 1983. The "BRISBANE NEWS" reported "UFO CRASHES IN FLAMES."

More From Australia

UFO ENCOUNTER Newsletter (July/August 1983) reported increased UFO activity in China, a Chilean jet/UFO chase, and the uses of hypnosis. The China UFO Research Organisation (CURO) reported a "massive luminous object" seen by Chinese Air Force pilots on October 21, 1978, linking it to the disappearance of Frederick Valentich. The craft was described as "very large, rectangular and emitting a strong light."

A New Role for Dr. Hynek?

The Danish magazine UFO CONTACT (June 1983) questioned if J. Allen Hynek was a "GOVERNMENT PLANT." Donald R. Todd of APRO expressed doubt about Hynek's motives, suggesting he could sabotage UFO study. Todd's reasoning was based on Hynek never having personally seen a "flying saucer." The November 1983 issue of the magazine featured Hans C. Petersen accusing Dr. Hynek of being a CIA agent and that CUFOS had not released a single investigated UFO report in eight years, with all cases allegedly being forwarded to the CIA for a complete black-out.

UFO News Round-Up (Continued)

NORTHERN UFO NEWS (Sept/Oct.1983) contained an article about a "RADAR/VISUAL ENCOUNTER 'HUSHED UP?'" from the summer of 1948 involving a York transport plane near Oxford. An object detected by radar was estimated to be about 100ft in diameter. Meteor jets were sent to intercept, but the object accelerated away at 1500mph. Those involved were debriefed and told to keep silent.

AWARENESS. JOURNAL OF CONTACT INTERNATIONAL. Issue 1. 1983-84 included an article on "CLOSE ENCOUNTERS OF THE FIRST KIND IN YUGOSLAVIA" concerning a "flap" in March 1979, and detailed sighting reports from Skipton, Yorkshire. The east Pennines of Yorkshire had sightings in March and April 1983, including a possible physical trace case at Grassington analyzed by Leeds University. The BRADFORD TELEGRAPH AND ARGUS reported sightings above Wharf Valley and Addington, including a nurse seeing a "bright metallic object" on July 19, 1983.

MAGONIA issue No.14 featured an article by Hilary Evans on "NORTHERN LIGHTS," describing a visit to Arendal and Hessdalen, Norway, to investigate UFO Norway's work. Evans spoke to witnesses and examined photographs, concluding that the Norwegian sightings, like those in Missouri, were based on a "fundamentally physical phenomenon."

Science correspondent Ian Ridpath contributed an article on "AN EXPLANATION OF THE WOODBRIDGE UFO," attributing it to a combination of a fireball and the pulsating light from Orford Ness lighthouse. Ridpath visited the site and confirmed the lighthouse beam appeared to hover above the trees.

BUFORA's Membership Secretary Speaks Out

NUFORA BULLETIN Vol.11 No.4 (June 1983) briefly reviewed UFO events during 1982. Pam Kennedy, BUFORA's Membership Secretary, was featured in her local newspaper, discussing her interest in UFOs since 1953 and how the subject has become more respectable.

Cyclic UFOs

Rev. H.D.L. Thomas was featured in the press during autumn 1983 with letters on UFOs, noting that they appear in cycles with a peak in October. He requested readers send details of sightings. A reader, Mr W.A. Payne, found the existence of UFOs improbable, questioning the possibility of intelligent life on other planets and suggesting sightings were optical illusions. Mr E.L. Fitch suggested that individuals see what they want to see.

Press Reports

The NEWS OF THE WORLD covered the alleged landing of a UFO in Rendlesham Forest, Suffolk, in December 1980. The case, attributed to the tenacity of Dot Street and Brenda Butler, was discussed by Jenny Randles, Mrs Street, and Mrs Butler at a BUFORA meeting. The media's silence on this case, along with articles in the "DAILY TELEGRAPH" and "THE TIMES," made the author suspicious, especially if a scientific correspondent like Adrian Berry was promoting a "hoax UFO photograph."

"THE PEOPLE" reported on "CLOSE ENCOUNTER AT THE SHAMROCK CAFE" concerning an alleged abduction in Shropshire. Berrows "WORCESTER JOURNAL" featured an article on "CLOSE ENCOUNTERS FROM OUTER SPACE" for junior readers.

Other press cuttings from Australia reported on an extensive "flap" in 1983, with no coverage in the UK press.

Letters to the Editor

The Pennine Mystery

Steuart Campbell wrote to express surprise at Hilary Evans' praise for Jenny Randles' book "THE PENNINE UFO MYSTERY," calling the narrative "somewhat incoherent" and lacking a satisfactory conclusion. Campbell argued that there was no special Pennine UFO mystery and that Randles had hyped a rag-bag of incidents. He criticized the inclusion of a chapter on hypnotic regression, deeming it prone to fantasy. Campbell felt the book was padded with references and did not stick to the point, accusing Randles of a journalistic style that juxtaposes ideas without critique.

Hilary Evans Replies

Hilary Evans responded to Steuart Campbell's critique. Evans clarified that his statement about the book being "somewhat incoherent" and "lacking a conclusion" was followed by "but then that is precisely what the affair itself presents." He argued that the book should be judged as a situation report on an ongoing affair, not as an analysis of a concluded case. Evans stated that Randles' book aimed to inform the general public about serious matters and should be compared to other popular UFO books, not necessarily to detailed reports like Campbell's own Livingston case study. He praised Randles' book for its references and credits to other investigators, and for its insightful comments, proving that a popular book can be written without distorting facts.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include the reporting of UFO sightings and encounters from around the world, with a particular focus on alleged landings, abductions, and close encounters. There is a consistent effort to present information from various sources, including international press and specialized UFO journals. The issue also touches upon the debate surrounding the nature of UFO phenomena, with discussions on whether they are extraterrestrial, psychological, or secret man-made devices. The role and credibility of prominent figures in ufology, such as Dr. J. Allen Hynek, are critically examined. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, encouraging readers to submit their own reports and to critically evaluate the information presented, while also acknowledging the growing respectability of the subject.

The magazine highlights the importance of documented evidence and investigation, as seen in the detailed reviews of books and articles. There is an underlying skepticism towards simplistic explanations and a recognition of the complexity and multifaceted nature of UFO reports. The publication aims to dispel misconceptions and provide a platform for serious discussion on anomalous phenomena.

This issue of the BULLETIN, identified as Issue 10 and dated November 1983, is published by BUFORA and focuses on organizational matters and reader correspondence. The cover headline highlights "PROBE REPORT" and "REFLECTIONS ON THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD," indicating a discussion of a previous article.

PROBE Errors

Douglas Payne of Midlothian, Scotland, writes to address three specific errors he found in his article "REFLECTIONS ON THE YELLOW BRICK ROAD" published in the previous issue of PROBE REPORT. He points out a typographical error where "Objective" should have been "subjective," altering the meaning of a sentence. Secondly, he corrects "temporarily" to "temporally" in reference to unconscious fantasy, emphasizing a chronological confusion rather than a temporary one. Thirdly, he notes an inaccuracy in a drawing, stating that an arrowed line should not extend to the end of a continuum but stop short, which is important for his explanation of "A Waking Consciousness." Payne states that his original typescript was correct and expresses uncertainty about whether these errors can now be rectified.

Ian Mrzyglod replies to Payne's letter, apologizing for the typographical errors, attributing them possibly to the frequent use of "objectives" and "subjectives." He hopes that publishing the letter will partially correct the situation. Mrzyglod also humorously points out that Payne himself missed a major error: the misspelling of his name as "Dougas" instead of "Douglas." He explains that this letter was originally intended for PROBE REPORT but is now included in the BULLETIN to clarify any queries regarding Payne's article.

BUFORA's Future

D.G. Frost of Stockport writes to question the future of BUFORA, expressing shock at the low membership figure of only 298 people out of the UK's population of 56 million. He notes that only 13 are Council members and 24 are "official" investigators, with the rest passively receiving information. Frost calls for BUFORA to realize that a new approach is needed for UK ufology, led by "ordinary members." He urges members not to remain on the sidelines but to attend meetings, voice opinions, and help shape decisions. Frost suggests that BUFORA establish a new public relations department to promote the Association and recruit new members. He also advocates for a postal ballot system for the election of new Council members and the Chairman, allowing paid-up members to vote for important positions like Director of Investigations, Director of Research, and Publications.

The CHAIRMAN replies, strongly supporting Frost's call for greater member participation. He emphasizes that recruitment is of paramount importance, stating that if each of the 298 members nominated one further member, many of BUFORA's current difficulties would be resolved.

How You Can Help BUFORA

This section calls for investigators in the London and Home Counties area, asking interested individuals to contact Steve Chetwynd in Old Windsor, Berkshire. It is stressed that while no previous experience is necessary, an open-minded, objective approach and a sympathetic manner towards witnesses are required. For those in other parts of the UK wishing to help with investigatory work, they are asked to contact BUFORA's Director of Investigations, Miss Jenny Randles, in Somerville, Wirral. Members can also assist by passing on UFO report cuttings from their local, regional, and free advertising newspapers to the Association. This work is seen as crucial for assisting investigation teams and improving the functioning of BUFORA.

Future Meetings

Announcements are made for three future meetings:

• March 3rd, 1984: "THE LOCH NESS MONSTER. A CASE TO ANSWER" with Adrian Shine.
• April 7th, 1984: "RELIGION AND UFOSs" with Jeremy Lockyer.
• May 5th, 1984: "THE GENIUS OF THE FEW" with C.A.E. O'Brien.

All meetings are scheduled to begin at 6:30 pm and end around 9:30 pm, taking place at the London Business School, Sussex Place, Regents Park, London, NW1.

Editorial Stance and Disclaimer

A disclaimer states that the British UFO Research Association does not hold or express corporate views on UFO phenomena, and contributions reflect only the views of the editor or authors. Original material is copyrighted to the contributor and BUFORA, and any material involving other copyright holders must be marked as such.

UFO Word Search

Ian Mrzyglod presents a "ufological brain teaser" in the form of a word search puzzle. The list of words to find includes terms like ALIEN, ARNOLD (Kenneth), ATLANTIS, BLUE (Book), CAR STOP, CIGAR, CLOSE ENCOUNTER, DISC, ETH, FAST, FLAT, FLYING, FLYING SAUCER, HUMANOID, HYNEK (J. Allen), IFO, JESSUP (M.K.), KEYHOE (Maj. D), LANDED, MAGONIA, MENGER (Howard), MIB, NICAP, OBJECT, OVAL, PHOTO, PLANET, PLUTO, RADAR, REAL, RESEARCH, REVIEW, SIGHTING, SILVERY, SKYWATCHING, STAR, UF O, UFOLOGY, UNIDENTIFIED, and VALLEE (Jacques). An extra word is included in the list that does not appear in the table. The puzzle is designed to be read in straight lines, vertically, horizontally, and diagonally, and can also be written backwards. Some letters are used twice.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of BULLETIN primarily addresses internal organizational issues within BUFORA, including member engagement, recruitment, and the future direction of the association. It also features reader feedback on published articles, highlighting the importance of accuracy and clarity. The inclusion of a UFO word search and announcements for future meetings on diverse topics such as the Loch Ness Monster and the intersection of religion and UFOs indicate a broad approach to ufological interests. The editorial stance, as indicated by the disclaimer, is to provide a platform for diverse views within the UFO research community without necessarily endorsing them as the Association's official position. The emphasis on member participation and the call for contributions suggest an editorial desire to foster a more active and engaged membership.