19 - BUFOI Magazine - No 19 - juin-sept 1969

Magazine Overview

This issue of BUFOI, identified as number 19, covers the period from June to September 1969. The magazine is dedicated to Georges Adamski and is published bi-monthly. The cover prominently features the title 'BUFOI' and an image of a flying saucer, with a subtitle indicating it is published within the framework of the World Organization for Research on Unidentified Flying Objects (Organisation Mondiale de Recherches sur les Objets Volants Non Identifiés - I.G.A.P.). The price is listed as 3.-.

Editorial

The editorial, titled 'DITC RIA', begins by stating that if half the world's population believes in flying saucers, the other half can be called senseless. It notes that about twenty years after the advent of the flying saucer era, millions worldwide accept the possibility, yet the reaction is minimal, with many remaining undecided, uninterested, or ignorant. The editorial attributes this to several factors: authorities denying their existence, science rejecting them, and anonymous agencies opposing their revelation. Meanwhile, researchers, often aided by saucer pilots, have been observing the phenomenon. The editorial criticizes science for generally refusing to examine evidence, or for organizing its investigations from flawed premises, preferring to stick to established concepts rather than exploring inexplicable discoveries. It references Georges Adamski's role in providing evidence, mentioning an interview with Charlotte Blodget for her book "Inside the Space Ships." The editorial questions the impact of producing physical evidence of alien objects, comparing it to the issue of photographic proof. It suggests that the 'Brothers of Space' might be waiting for humanity to awaken to a better existence. The editorial emphasizes that science has denied evidence, quoting Wilbert Smith, who noted that while one can lead a horse to water, one cannot make it drink. It argues that if evidence is only philosophical, it can be doubted, but when it aligns with real observations, it becomes harder to dismiss. The article highlights how extraterrestrial visitors explain phenomena and the behavior of their craft. It mentions that 'The New Science' (a review published after Wilbert Smith's death) summarizes his thoughts on philosophy, physics, and mathematics, with a section dedicated to 'Principles and Techniques of other Races,' based on conversations with space beings. The editorial criticizes the lack of scientific engagement with UFO evidence over the past twenty years, suggesting that scientific studies have focused on data already processed, rather than new evidence. It implies that military agencies and isolated cases have been dismissed or downplayed. The editorial laments that public discontent sometimes forces authorities to act, but this leads to lethargy and recriminations. It criticizes scientists who, like Wilbert Smith, should have examined all contact cases, but instead dismissed reports of 'imbalanced' individuals. The term 'contact' has become taboo, exploited by those seeking fame. The editorial notes a schism within the UFO community between those who believe in contacts and those who dismiss them, with 'serious' ufologists often viewing contactees as gullible. It points out attempts to link the Bible and prehistoric legends to modern sightings, which are met with ridicule by 'experts.' The editorial warns that if contact has not yet occurred, it is bound to happen in the future, questioning when 'patent experts' will accept this. It asks if Adamski and others will be considered predecessors if contact is proven, and challenges researchers to disprove the correlation between prehistoric cultures and advanced technology. It suggests that Earth's history is recent and that human technology has rapidly advanced, enabling space travel. However, it contrasts this with the 'Uranians' (extraterrestrials) whose science is centuries old, implying they could have arrived long before human history. The editorial criticizes 'serious experts' for sowing discord and questions whether the world will reach a point where half the population believes in UFOs, or if rapid space progression will allow assimilation of the flying saucer phenomenon. It expresses hope that the revelation will come sooner than anticipated, either through pressure on governments or a massive arrival of alien craft. It suggests a controlled, non-panicked approach to this revelation, avoiding mass hysteria. The editorial concludes by stating that if governments persist in denial, it could lead to a climate of terror. It advocates for educating the public about space travel and research, allowing them to express their experiences and potentially annulling military regulations that prevent pilots from reporting UFO sightings. It calls for governments to place this issue on the UN agenda, neutralizing governmental control to achieve real progress. It predicts that in the near future, 100% of the world's population will know about the question, and authorities will face a difficult task justifying their policies.

UFO-Science

This section features an interview with Georges Adamski from 1957, discussing "Cosmic Science" and the advancement of cosmic principles and truths. Adamski is asked about the propulsion of space vessels. He states he cannot give detailed technical information beyond what he has already published, comparing it to a mechanic explaining an airplane's function. He explains that the power is drawn from space, similar to the breath that sustains life, and involves transforming natural elements into energy. He likens the energy in a lightning strike to that of all Earth's power stations combined. Adamski notes that visitors work in harmony with nature and have learned to discipline this energy, but have not explained their methods due to human hostility. He mentions that a small device could be destructive, explaining the visitors' hesitation to share such knowledge. He reiterates that scientists are working towards understanding this universal power, but its use will depend on the user's intent.

Adamski is also asked about "green bolides" that are sometimes accompanied by explosions. He explains that bolides are natural phenomena, as old as nature itself, often manifesting during or after thunderstorms. They represent a concentration of electrical energy. He states that nuclear experiments have created false conditions in the atmosphere, leading to the formation of these bolides, which can be invisible until they draw elements from the atmosphere. He mentions that space beings, using their advanced equipment, can detect and disintegrate these false bolides with high-frequency rays as a form of assistance. He clarifies that both natural and artificial bolides can explode when their energy concentration becomes too intense. He notes that UFOs themselves can resemble bolides, appearing in various colors like green, red, orange, and white, and that people often confuse them.

Regarding telepathy, Adamski states it is not received through a special sense but through a complete understanding of one's truth and disciplined reactions. He asserts that telepathy is universally known and employed in nature, and only humans, due to their focus on personality, have become separated from it. He promises further explanation in his course.

Primhistory

This section includes two articles: "The hieroglyphs of Baien-Kara-Ula" (pages 16) and "The Greek/Maya/Mu Alphabet" (page 10). These articles likely explore ancient symbols and their potential connections to extraterrestrial or lost civilizations.

UFO-Literature

This section contains a "Critique of Edwards' book" (page 22), suggesting a review of a publication related to UFOs or a similar topic.

Informations Groupe "D"

This section, titled "INFORMATIONS GROUPE 'D'" (page 24), likely presents updates or reports from a specific research group.

UFO-Observations

This section (page 32) is dedicated to reports of UFO sightings.

UFO-Flash

This section (page 33) likely contains brief news items or quick updates related to UFO phenomena.

Responsibility Clause

A statement at the bottom of the table of contents reads: "THE ARTICLES ENGAGE ONLY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THEIR AUTHORS."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue of BUFOI revolve around the existence and reality of UFOs and extraterrestrial contact. The editorial stance is strongly in favor of accepting these phenomena, often criticizing the scientific and governmental establishment for their denial and skepticism. The magazine champions the philosophy of Georges Adamski, promoting a view of humanity as part of a larger cosmic community. There is a clear emphasis on uncovering hidden truths, challenging conventional scientific paradigms, and advocating for a more open and accepting approach to the possibility of alien visitation. The magazine appears to be a platform for disseminating information and perspectives that are outside the mainstream, aiming to educate and awaken readers to what it considers the reality of our cosmic context. The editorial also expresses a sense of urgency, suggesting that the time for revelation is approaching rapidly.

This issue of PRIMHISTOIRE, identified by the page number "16.-", delves into several intriguing topics related to ancient mysteries, extraterrestrial encounters, and linguistic analysis. The main cover headline focuses on "Les Hiéroglyphes de BAIAN-KARA- ULA" (The Hieroglyphs of BAIAN-KARA-ULA).

Telepathy and Cosmic Consciousness

The first section discusses telepathy, defining it not merely as receiving impressions from others or contacting 'people from space,' but as a deeper understanding of its components, purpose, and relation to the 'Cosmic Whole.' True telepathy, it suggests, allows reception from all phases of Creation. It posits that all manifestations are expressions of the Unique Creator, leading those who understand this to neither judge nor condemn, recognizing all as children of the Divine Father and having abstained from war for millions of years. The section concludes with a provocative question: "I ask you: 'Who is the Antichrist?'"

UFO Investigations and Scientific Scrutiny

Pages 13 and 14 detail a session opened by Dr. J.A. Allen Hynek, who presented pertinent observations on the UFO problem, highlighting the lack of valid scientific investigation and its direct impact on Air Force activities. Hynek advocated for a new UFO study program, sponsored by the government and potentially in collaboration with the United Nations, due to the numerous international sightings. The author of this section aligns with Hynek, stressing the importance of the UFO issue beyond public or congressional perception and suggesting that the extraterrestrial hypothesis is the most plausible explanation based on current information. The author also critiques Menzel's meteorological explanations and Klass's 'plasmic UFOs' theory, noting coincidences between power outages and UFO appearances.

Dr. Carl Sagan of Cornell University spoke about the increasing evidence for the existence of intelligent life on numerous planets in the galaxy, emphasizing that evidence is a product of logic. He expressed a desire for more direct information on extraterrestrial civilizations, possibly through improved radio astronomy.

Later, Dr. Robert Hall from the University of Illinois presented a dissertation based on sociological and psychological questions surrounding UFOs, arguing against viewing the phenomenon as mere 'contagious hysteria.' He discussed the public's potential apprehension if UFOs were confirmed as extraterrestrial and criticized the official handling of the problem, advocating for transparency rather than dissuasion.

Dr. James Harder of the University of California discussed the Red Bluff (California) observation and the concept of propulsion. He also reviewed the Wells Alan Webb observation, which involved polarization effects attributed to magnetic fields. Harder faced technical advisors from the Committee and asserted that the magnesium sample discovered in Uabatuba, with its high density, suggested a structural material with low impurity content, though his thesis was questioned regarding the purity analysis.

Dr. Robert H/L. Baker of UCLA Systems Corporation concluded the session by citing control systems, like the BMEWS radar, designed to filter out signals not matching known hostile ballistic missiles. He discussed methods for establishing a UFO detection network, analyzing photogrammetric films from Utah and Great Falls.

The session concluded with a 30-minute Q&A period. The author mentions that declarations and verbal introductions will be published, with the Committee aiming to print everything around August 15th. Readers are encouraged to contact their congressmen or the Representative Committee for Science and Astronautics.

The Hieroglyphs of Baian-Kara-Ula

Pages 16, 17, and 18 focus on the discovery of ancient discs in the Baian-Kara-Ula cave region, located between Tibet and China. Archaeologist Tsum Um-nui reported finding these discs, inscribed with peculiar hieroglyphs, over 25 years prior. These stone discs, about the size of gramophone records with a central hole and spiral grooves, have been deciphered after more than 20 years of work by archaeologists and linguists. The content is described as astonishing, detailing the 'Dropas,' who descended from the clouds in 'aerial gliders' about 12,000 years ago. The texts describe their arrival with peaceful intentions and their interactions with the local population.

Further details reveal that the Baian-Kara-Ula people, or Khams, were small in stature (around 1.30 cm tall). The hieroglyphs describe their 'own airships' being destroyed during an unsuccessful landing in the mountains, leaving them without the means to build new ones. Scientific analysis of particles from the discs revealed a large quantity of cobalt and metal, and oscillograph tests showed a surprising vibrational rhythm, suggesting the discs were 'charged' or acted as electrical conductors.

The text also references ancient Chinese legends of small, yellow, thin humans who 'came from the clouds' and were large-headed with extremely thin bodies. Remains found in caves, dating back approximately 12,000 years, were described as belonging to the 'Dropas or Khams race,' characterized by slender builds and immense skulls. The issue questions the notion of 'ordered monkey tombs' and 'inscribed discs' made by prehistoric apes.

In 1940, archaeologist Tchi-Pou-tei was reportedly insulted across Asia for his theory that these skeletal remains belonged to a race of apes, but that the inscribed discs were brought by a 'later civilization.' The cave walls also feature images of the rising sun, moon, and stars, with dots moving elegantly towards the mountains and the Earth's surface.

Searching for a Submerged Civilization: Mu and Greece

Pages 18 and 19 explore the search for a strange civilization under the sea. An underwater exploration is planned to investigate a 2,000-year-old Celtic nomadic civilization in the Scilly Isles, southwest of Great Britain. Aerial observations have noted a circle of 13 standing stones on the seabed, possibly part of a nomadic camp. The expedition aims to retrieve sediment cores to search for older vestiges.

The text then introduces Colonel James E. Churchward and his research into the lost continent of Mu. Churchward, while stationed in India, learned from a priest about terracotta tablets in a temple that recounted the history of a gigantic continent, Mu, located south of India thousands of years ago. Sages from Mu reportedly brought science and wisdom to India. Churchward's attempts to find further evidence were met with incomprehension or refusal from priests, but he eventually discovered numerous proofs worldwide.

Linguistic Correlation: Greek and Cara Maya

Pages 19 and 20 present a detailed linguistic comparison between the Greek alphabet and the Cara Maya language. Churchward discovered phonetic resemblances between certain Cara Maya words and Greek letters, leading him to assemble a table correlating the Greek alphabet with Cara Maya words and their French meanings. This analysis suggests a potential link between these ancient languages, possibly related to extraterrestrial visitors.

• For example:
• Alpha (Greek) corresponds to AL (heavy) in Cara Maya, with the meaning "heavy, tomb, to defer, water."
• Beta (Greek) corresponds to BE (to move) in Cara Maya, meaning "to move, water, place, plain, soil."
• Gamma (Greek) corresponds to KAM (to receive) in Cara Maya, meaning "to receive, earth, mother."
• Delta (Greek) corresponds to TEL (deep) in Cara Maya, meaning "deep, place, etc."
• Epsilon (Greek) corresponds to EP (to butcher) in Cara Maya, with meanings including "to butcher, to surface, ONOM, cyclone, whirlpool, trombe."

The direct translation of the Cara Maya phrases derived from this correlation describes events like "heavy waters descending over the plains," "covering the low-lying areas," "forming shores," and "the earth being struck by water." It speaks of "obstructions," "submergence," "whirlwinds," "abysses," "cold depths," and "volcanic sediments."

The text concludes by suggesting that Mu might have been an ancient colony of extraterrestrials that sank due to a natural or unnatural cataclysm. It posits that these extraterrestrials may have had other colonies globally, including in Egypt, America, and India, and that survivors might have left traces of their presence for future generations.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the potential existence of ancient, advanced civilizations (like Mu and the Baian-Kara-Ula visitors), the scientific investigation of UFO phenomena, and the exploration of linguistic and historical connections that might support these theories. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, presenting controversial theories and evidence from archaeological and scientific perspectives, encouraging readers to consider possibilities beyond conventional explanations. There's a clear emphasis on challenging established narratives and seeking deeper truths about humanity's past and potential cosmic connections.

This issue of "Phénomènes" magazine, identified by its page number 21, delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena, critical analysis of UFO literature, and potential governmental involvement or cover-ups. The content is primarily in French, with a focus on detailed accounts and arguments.

Article 1: Critiques of Frank Edwards' Work on Georges Adamski

This section begins with a statement by Patrick Horlet, suggesting that certain evidence might have only been comprehensible to initiates (like Egyptian and Mayan priests) and that the tradition eventually degenerated and was lost. It then transitions into a critique of Frank Edwards' book, "Du Nouveau sur les Soucoupes Volantes," published by Laffont. The author asserts that Edwards' claims about Georges Adamski are "absolutely inaccurate" and questions whether Edwards actually read the books he discusses.

The primary inaccuracy highlighted is the date of Adamski's death, which Edwards states as 1963, while the actual date was April 23, 1965. The article suggests Edwards is attempting to discredit Adamski. Further errors pointed out include Edwards' claim that Adamski was a "Hamburger vendor" (he only helped friends with a restaurant) and that Adamski wrote a science fiction book in 1949 (the date is stated as incorrect, with Ray Palmer of "Flying Saucer" magazine suggesting 1943).

A direct quote from Adamski's booklet "Questions et Réponses" (Book 5, Question 30) refutes the claim that he submitted a manuscript in 1943 similar to "Flying Saucers Have Landed." Adamski states he was not writing anything in 1943, as he was raising chickens and tending an orchard in "Valley Center" during the war, and did not employ a secretary or typewriter. He questions why Palmer waited 15 years to bring up this alleged manuscript.

The article also addresses Edwards' confusion between Adamski's books "Les Soucoupes Volantes ont atterri" and "A l'Intérieur des Vaisseaux de l'Espace," noting that the encounter with the Venusian Orthon is described in the former, not the latter. Edwards' description of the Venusian as a "woman in gold" is also contested, with the book stating the Venusian was a man in a brown suit and that drawings were made in the sand by the sole of his boot, not a message from a "slender boot."

Further criticisms include Edwards' assertion that a photograph of a flying saucer taken by Adamski in 1952 was actually a 1937 vacuum cleaner, a claim the article finds dubious, questioning why it took Edwards 8 years to make this assertion and why he couldn't produce a drawing or photo to support it.

Adamski's alleged offer to take people to Mars and Venus via hypnosis for $50 is called "disgusting villainy and a lie." The author expresses conviction that Edwards would not have dared write this if Adamski were alive. The article concludes by lamenting that a well-known author like Edwards would report such erroneous information about Adamski, following a trend of other authors who have made contemptuous statements without knowing his books or his person.

Article 2: "CHICHE" - L'ELOGE DE LA FOLIE (Chiche - The Praise of Madness)

This section, attributed to "Groupe D," discusses the inexplicable nature of "saucer" phenomena. It suggests that these phenomena will one day be naturally explained by scientific discoveries. The authors express a willingness to be proven wrong, stating that if the phenomena are verified, they will adopt a ridiculous position and join the Trappists, accepting the blessing of Professor Condon.

They propose a bet: if the phenomena are proven to be extraterrestrial, they will sign a declaration admitting their "cretinism." They challenge the reader to accept the same risk. The article criticizes those who, while sharing their convictions, continue to play a "clever little comedy" aligned with the official narrative. It notes a decrease in such individuals and mentions discreet deserters who will quietly reread Molière.

Article 3: Responsibility - "To Mr. Nixon"

This piece criticizes the lack of attention from "great responsible" figures and heads of state regarding unidentified flying objects (UFOs) and their implications for interplanetary security. It questions how the "comedy of negation" has been sustained for so long, referencing the 1,485 pages of the Condon Report (January 1969).

The author argues that what a responsible figure thinks is less important than the content of the "secret dossier" available at the White House. The issue of UFOs is expected to eventually be handled by the United Nations, as it is a planetary affair. The process is described as a "curious trial" where the condemned constantly appeal due to procedural flaws in previous investigations.

Dr. J.A. Hynek is mentioned as having joined the "contestataires" (those who contest the official narrative), fearing that the Soviets might denounce UFOs as extraterrestrial visitors. The article praises James E. Mac Donald for stating that Hynek refuses to be remembered as the man who denied a fact justiciable by scientific study.

A significant number of other well-known scientists are noted to hold similar views. The explosive nature of the UFO dossier has been managed by five US presidents since H. Truman, with little progress. President Johnson, in October 1966, created a "new commission of inquiry" (a continuation of previous ones), knowing he would not seek re-election.

The deadlines for submitting conclusions, set for 2 x 15 months, were to fall under Mr. Nixon, the presumptive heir to the Condon Corvée. Fortunately for both the outgoing and incoming presidents, a date was chosen that would not obligate the former and would not yet commit the latter.

Article 4: The Condon Report and its Aftermath

This section discusses the administrative shuffle during the transition from Johnson to Nixon, during which the Condon Report was released with relative indifference. The author suggests that Mr. Nixon, under unpredictable celestial circumstances, might have the opportunity to reopen the dossier, forget it, or reject the inheritance. The report itself, however, innocently concludes by definitively closing the dossier.

The report is criticized for accusing "Soucoupistes" (UFO enthusiasts) of pressuring commission members. Two individuals were excluded from the committee for anticipating conclusions contrary to the final report. Initially chosen for their scientific expertise, they were later labeled as incompetent. The article questions who assumes responsibility for these actions.

Ponce Pilate is invoked as an example of someone who was responsible, suggesting that this mold has not been broken. The most significant conclusion of the conflict between pro- and anti-UFO proponents is attributed to Dr. E. Mac Donald, who declared that "The Condon group wasted an unprecedented opportunity to conduct the first serious scientific study of the UFO problem."

A note (1) mentions that this discussion led to the authors being featured on RTB (Belgian Radio and Television) for an interview in Brussels on January 10, 1969. The "Questions et Réponses" team is commended for their impartiality during these informative circumstances.

Article 5: Oceanic Secret Bases - "BAVIC" Corridor

This article explores the possibility of secret oceanic bases and the use of ocean depths for military purposes, referencing a report by the United Nations. It highlights the advantage of oceanic opacity over satellite surveillance for nuclear powers.

Case 1: January 1966 - Lanzarote, Canary Islands

A seasoned navigator reported observing a large, glowing red disc descend into the sea off the coast of Lanzarote. The object performed low-altitude oscillations before entering the water. Mr. Aureliano Negrin Armas observed no bubbling, vapor emission, or other traces of disturbance. The area is noted for its deep seabed, reaching 1,000 meters, and its proximity to the "BAVIC" line.

Case 2: March 1959 - New Zealand

Two inseparable "fireballs" fell into the sea in an unspecified location near New Zealand. These were dismissed as "meteorites," but the event resulted in a small tidal wave and caused deep-sea fish, normally never seen, to wash ashore dead or alive. The article connects this to accounts found in Charles Fort's work.

The article questions whether the "BAVIC" line, described as a large circle, encircles the planet. It notes that while the seabed off Wellington is deeper, the coincidence of a submarine volcanic eruption with the "tandem" fall in March 1959 is questioned. The hypothesis is raised that "diving saucers" might paralyze and drag marine fauna, making it unable to survive the surface pressure. The authors suggest that if "they" know about human progress in underwater exploration, "they" must ensure their own security, possibly at bases in Amazonia, Antarctica, the Himalayas, or the Moon.

Article 6: Operation "Espadon" (Swordfish)

This section discusses a codename, "Espadon," used by "hawks, falcons, and other sharks" of militarism, revealed in an Associated Press communiqué on August 12, 1968. The communiqué, shortened, states that the UN report on "military uses of the seabed and oceans" suggests that major powers might one day hide nuclear missile bases in the ocean depths to avoid satellite surveillance.

These documents are to be examined by a special commission for the peaceful use of the seabed. The article sarcastically notes the irony of this, given the potential for underwater UFOs.

It questions why visitors in "diving saucers" should be denied the possibility of achieving what humans will technically achieve tomorrow. The article mentions imprecise immersion reports along the South American coast and a document detailing nearly twenty "shipwrecks" in the "BAVIC" zone from 1950 to the present, researched by Mr. Oscar Galindez.

Many discs are observed to enter the water horizontally, suggesting underwater travel. The article notes the phenomenon of large quantities of algae being brought up after a saucer immersion or emergence, as seen in New Zealand.

Article 7: Recent Observations in Brussels

This section details recent UFO sightings in Brussels, reported by the "Groupe D."

Brussels - Anderlecht (May 12, 1969, 8:30 AM): Mr. Gl. Vanderbracht, an architect, observed a stationary, elliptical, yellow object with a radiant center. The object's intense luminosity was noticeable even in daylight. The witness was unable to stop due to traffic and the location.

Brussels - Schaerbeek "Cage aux Ours" (May 13, 1969, 10:45 PM): Mr. Jules Louis, a mechanic, saw a bright, circular, vivid blue object moving at regular speed. He estimated its size as half that of the full moon and followed it for about two minutes.

Brussels - Etterbeek (May 13, 1969, 11:15 PM): Mr. P. Ferryn observed an electric blue object moving at high speed from South to North. Despite the briefness of the phenomenon, he estimated its size as half the full moon. The object left a fugitive luminous trail of the same width as its body, which did not persist, and the phenomenon gradually faded, unlike the disintegration of a meteorite.

The authors suggest these three phenomena might have been visible from the Uccle Observatory, particularly the stationary object on the 12th and possibly the nocturnal phenomena if they were similar in the south of Brussels as they were in the north.

Follow-up Observation:

Schaerbeek "Cage aux Ours" (May 21, 1969, 8:30 PM): Mr. J. Louis and his colleagues observed the same phenomenon again. This time, the duration was shorter, and the speed and altitude were greater. The trajectory was slightly to the east but still estimated as parallel to the June 13th observation. The times did not correspond to the passage of polar satellites, and the slow movements often observed were absent. The authors note that their observations were not concluded with the May 13th date.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently questions official narratives and scientific skepticism regarding UFOs. It champions eyewitness accounts and suggests that many phenomena are deliberately ignored or misinterpreted by authorities and mainstream science. There is a strong undercurrent of belief in extraterrestrial visitation and a critique of perceived government cover-ups. The publication appears to align with a more open-minded, investigative approach to UFOs, often highlighting perceived flaws in official reports like the Condon Report and defending figures like Georges Adamski against detractors. The recurring theme of oceanic UFO activity and potential secret bases suggests a focus on less-explored aspects of the phenomenon. The tone is critical, questioning, and often polemical towards established institutions and viewpoints that dismiss UFOs outright.

This issue of BUFOI, identified as issue N°84 from 1969, focuses on the intriguing figure of astronaut Frank Bormann and related UFO phenomena. The magazine covers topics ranging from classified government documents and papal encounters to unexplained aerial events and philosophical considerations of extraterrestrial life.

The Enigmatic Frank Bormann

The issue begins by detailing an encounter in Brussels in February 1969, where astronaut Frank Bormann was asked about his thoughts on AFR 200-2 and JANAP 146. AFR 200-2 is described as a confidential document containing instructions and questionnaires for military personnel who have encountered UFOs, with approximately 20 pages in existence. JANAP 146 is presented as an imperative service order enforcing strict secrecy regarding UFO sightings, with penalties including fines and military imprisonment. Despite the alleged 'leak' of AFR 200-2, these documents are not meant to exist. Bormann's response to the question was a written statement: "I have never seen UFOs," signed by him. This statement, found on the back of a card returned to the interviewer, is presented as definitive proof of the existence of these documents related to flying saucers.

Papal Encounters and Space Voyages

The magazine then shifts to a story connecting Pope John XXIII, Pope Paul VI, and Frank Bormann. It recounts that during the Apollo VIII translunar mission's stop in Rome in 1969, the renowned space traveler presented Pope Paul VI with a gold medal that he had received from Pope John XXIII. Bormann revealed this during a gathering of bishops, stating he had carried the precious gold piece, bearing the effigy of the late Pope, with him on his fantastic journey. An amusing anecdote is shared where Bormann misinterpreted a question from Syrian prelate Mgr. Ignace Mansourati, "Is man VIABLE on the moon?" by responding that he had never seen the DEVIL on the moon, thus avoiding confusion with 'little green men.' The report notes that Rome has never denied the account of Pope John XXIII's audience with George Adamski, nor the presentation of a gold medal to Adamski, described as an 'Ambassador' from Venus, similar to one given to Bormann. This audience with Adamski was marked by exceptional esteem and was granted shortly before the Pope's death. Adamski, who claimed to be the first to see the other side of Phoebe, supposedly delivered a sealed package containing a 'mysterious message' to the Pope during this occasion.

Martian Tourists in Tunis?

A brief report from Radio-Tunis details an event over Tunisia where "two unidentified objects appeared... and one of them exploded like an atomic bomb." The radio specified that a blue ring, the size of the Moon, entered the Tunisian sky and moved north. Shortly after, a second object, comparable in luminosity to a star, appeared and exploded, illuminating the sky with characteristics of an atomic detonation. This report is attributed to 'Le Matin' on August 6, 1969.

Soviet Space Studies and Extraterrestrial Intelligence

This section references an article from "Soviet Studies of MARS 1969, N°252," discussing the "epoch of Orbital Stations" and an interrogation of four Russian astronauts. Vladimir CHALATOV is quoted as being struck by the grandiose spectacle after the spacecraft undocked, having seen "an enormous, sparkling Spaceship flying alongside, with the Earth in the distance." The article notes that the 4-page piece is entirely about "Brothers of Space."

Voltaire and the Cosmic Era

The magazine then references an article from "Planete N°1 - 1961," titled "Voltaire contemporary of the COSMIC era," from the "Philosophical Dictionary." Under the article "Religion, section II," it quotes Aimé Michel, who in turn quotes Voltaire. Voltaire reflects on contemplating nature, admiring its immensity, the course of infinite globes, and the intelligence guiding them. He posits that the same supreme power reigns throughout space and that beings on other planets should offer the same homage as humans on Earth. He argues that morality should be uniform across the universe, and any thinking being who can alleviate the suffering of another and fails to do so is culpable towards all globes. The "Philosophical Dictionary" also states that "infinity exists for well-gifted minds, and they are today in great number."

This Little Earth in the Universe

This section presents two contrasting viewpoints on religion and the existence of extraterrestrial life. The first, attributed to F.L., suggests that for the sake of religion, it is preferable not to raise the issue of intelligent beings on other planets, urging contentment with knowing our own imperfections and acknowledging God's inaccessible designs. The second viewpoint, likely a response or counterpoint, argues that religion does not require resignation to ignorance. It posits that if God made humans curious, it is disrespectful to leave this faculty undeveloped. It suggests that if God has allowed us to understand some of His designs through Creation and Revelation, we should strive to comprehend what these insights reveal. While acknowledging humanity's shortcomings in areas like misery and war, it praises the endeavor to discover other worlds as a legitimate source of pride. It concludes that until intelligent beings are discovered on other planets, the religious problem remains hypothetical but advises reflection to be prepared for such a discovery.

Questions Without Answers: The Moon

This section poses several questions regarding lunar observations and secrecy:

• Why are the Russians so interested in lunar phenomena observed since the 17th century?
• Why do the Russians keep most documents from their lunar cameras secret?
• Why do Americans also keep most of their lunar photographs secret?
• Why are geometric anomalies in published lunar photos never explained?
• Why are there no astronaut photos of specific lunar craters (Gassendi, Aristarque, etc.)?
• Why did American astronauts see the lunar soil as "Plaster of Paris" when color photos show it as green?

These questions are attributed to "Le Courrier Interplanétaire N°84, 1969."

New Book Announcement: "Unidentified Flying Objects"

The magazine announces the publication of a remarkable work titled "Unidentified Flying Objects: The greatest scientific problem of our time?" presented by the Groupement d'Etude de Phénomènes Aériens (G.E.P.A.). The author is Dr. James E. McDonald, Professor of Meteorology and Dean of Physics at the University of Arizona. The price is 7.50 French Francs, and orders should be sent to G.E.P.A. in Paris, with payment to a postal account. A presentation of the book is promised for the next BUFOI issue.

BUFOI Publication and Subscription Information

The final pages provide contact and subscription details for BUFOI. It lists the editors as Mme May Flitcroft-Lambotte and Gérard Landercy. The "Fraternity of Cosmic Sons and Daughters" is mentioned. The "Organisation" section details the General Headquarters of The George Adamski Foundation in Vista, California, and lists representatives of I.G.A.P. worldwide. Subscription rates are given: 200 frs. for a standard subscription, 300 frs. for a support subscription, and 400 frs. for a patron subscription. Payment details for the treasurer, Mme R. Peeters in Wemmel, Belgium, are provided. A notice states that material used in BUFOI cannot be reproduced without written permission from BUFOI, located at 13, Berkenlaan, Antwerp.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the mystery surrounding UFOs and their potential connection to space exploration and government secrecy. The magazine presents information from various sources, including official documents, astronaut accounts, and news reports, often posing questions that remain unanswered. There's a clear interest in declassified or leaked information regarding UFOs and a skepticism towards official explanations. The issue also touches upon the intersection of UFO phenomena with religious beliefs and the philosophical implications of discovering extraterrestrial intelligence. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry into unexplained phenomena, encouraging readers to consider possibilities beyond conventional understanding, while also acknowledging the importance of secrecy and the potential for misinterpretation.