The Armchair Ufologist - Issue 2 web

Magazine Overview

Title: The Armchair Ufologist
Issue: 2
Volume: 1
Date: Septobnocember 1997
Publisher: Magonia
Country: UK
Language: English
Cover Headline: Tough on ufology, tough on the causes of ufology

This issue of 'The Armchair Ufologist' presents a critical and often humorous take on contemporary ufology, covering a range of topics from celebrity deaths and their conspiracy implications to detailed analyses of UFO conferences and specific cases.

Obligatory Di Content

The issue opens with a brief, sardonic commentary on the death of Princess Diana, noting the ensuing conspiracy theories and humor material. The author reflects on mass hysteria, citing visions of the late princess and psychic channeling, and also mentions Elton John performing at a royal event. The section concludes with a playful suggestion to rename Venus.

No Reason To Get Excited

This section discusses the film 'Men In Black' and its mention of Roswell, noting that despite it being an 'anniversary' year, there has been no significant 'Big Wow' in UFO news. The author mentions being unable to attend many conferences due to other commitments like reading and mountain climbing.

The Disbelieving of Liverpool

The author recounts attending the 5th Merseyside BUFORA Conference. He describes the attendees as a 'motley crew,' including families, young couples, and older individuals. He humorously critiques the gender ratio and the perceived motivations of attendees. The section criticizes the idea of conferences as a 'babe fest' and advises women to seek better pursuits.

Margaret Fry's Talk

Margaret Fry, a veteran of the UFO scene and a practitioner of ufological arts, presented her views. The author notes her adherence to the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH) and their agreement to disagree. Her talk focused on the Berwyn Mountains 'crash' of 1974, a case that has recently resurfaced. The author notes the claim that an ET craft crashed and its occupants were removed to Aldermaston Atomic Weapons Establishment, with witnesses alleged.

'Britain's Roswell'

The author dismisses the Berwyn Mountains incident as 'Britain's Roswell,' expressing doubt that many in the audience were familiar with the case. He criticizes Margaret Fry's monotone delivery and her reliance on the 'remote' nature of the location as evidence. He argues that the concept of 'remote' in England or Wales is often exaggerated and used to prevent scrutiny.

Dave Clarke's Upcoming Work

Dave Clarke is mentioned as working on a definitive piece about the Berwyn event, tentatively titled 'It Was A Meteorite Really'.

Tim Matthews' Presentation

Tim Matthews is introduced as having arranged a truce with local group MARA to present a controversial view. Unlike Margaret Fry, Matthews spoke forcefully, presenting research on triangle UFOs and suggesting that some reports represent terrestrial, military, or test craft, rather than extraterrestrial vehicles. The author notes the audience's mixed reactions, with some 'serious ufologists' struggling to comprehend his findings.

#### Research Methodology

Matthews' success is attributed to his straightforward research into military air routes, bases, and secret aircraft materials. The author presents this as a lesson for other ufologists.

#### Roger Ellison's Talk

Roger Ellison's presentation on the ufological history of Runcorn and surrounding areas is described as 'terrible' and is largely dismissed.

He's A Rocket Man

Stan Conway, a figure in ufology for thirty years, spoke on UFO propulsion systems. The author expresses surprise that such topics are still considered relevant at conferences. He finds the attempt to determine the propulsion of unknown objects amusing and ultimately boring.

Stan Conway's Theories

Conway's theories are presented as his own, with the author suggesting he is likely the only one who believes them. It is mentioned that Conway was unhappy with a previous issue of 'TAU' magazine and had intended to confront the author at the gig.

Wood You Believe It?

This section focuses on Larry Warren and Peter Robbins, who were touring to promote their book 'Left At Eastgate,' about Rendlesham Forest. The author notes that their presentation on a Sunday resulted in a half-full hall, suggesting that book publicists often rely more on conferences than vice versa.

Rendlesham Forest Discussion

While not well-versed in the Rendlesham event, the author notes that 'those who know' consider Warren's claims questionable. However, he acknowledges Warren and Robbins as a strong double act, comparing them to 'cosmic Simon and Garfunkle.'

#### Larry Warren's Performance

Larry Warren is described as a fantastic performer, delivering jokes and claims of a breakthrough in understanding UFOs, and alleging he was silenced by the US military.

'Silenced' by the US Military

Warren and his co-author were on a lecture tour, which the author sarcastically frames as being 'silenced.'

Minor Contretemps

A brief argument occurred between Larry Warren and Tim Matthews regarding Matthews' 'low road' perspective on UFOs. Warren eventually apologized.

Conference Reflections

The author reflects on the wasted time at the conference, listening to what he deems 'complete and absolute garbage.'

Who's That Girl?

Judith Jaafar is introduced as an enigmatic figure at conferences, suspected by the author to be a government agent sent to spy on ufocons. Her rapid rise through BUFORA ranks is noted, and the author speculates that her 'peregrinations' might reveal a deep saucer-related secret. She is compared to Terry Waite and Irene Bott.

What's the Frequency Kenneth?

This section discusses the media frenzy surrounding UFOs in the week of June 24th. Newspapers, radio, and TV stations were reportedly obsessed with UFOs, yet the media seemed to lack understanding. Jonathan Ross is mentioned as hosting a 'light-hearted' TV look at the subject, which the author found to be 'stupid.'

Jonathan Ross's Comments

Ross is quoted as calling UFOs 'absolute rubbish,' suggesting that people interested in them are seeking media attention and should avoid watching 'The X-Files.'

Oooh, Wot a Picture

This section seriously examines a UFO photographic case from 1966, the 'Conisborough' photo taken by Stephen Pratt. The author notes that the people who took the photo have reappraised it. The photo, showing an orange blob and three saucers, has been considered a UFO classic but also suspected of being a hoax due to its similarity to the Alex Birch photo, which Birch later admitted was a hoax.

Kevin Pratt's Defense

Stephen Pratt's brother, Kevin, has published a small booklet defending the photo, asserting its genuineness. He offers to have the UFO negative and camera examined by independent experts. The author notes that UFO Magazine, through Graham & Mark Birdsall, has allowed Jerome Clark to dismiss the case.

Author's Skepticism

The author expresses his belief that the Conisborough photo is a hoax for several reasons:
1. Pratt did not see through the viewfinder what appeared in the photograph.
2. It strongly resembles the Alex Birch photograph.
3. It appears pasted onto glass, similar to other hoaxed photos.
4. The three 'saucers' are neatly arranged as if flying in formation.

BUFORA is mentioned as hoping to analyze the negative.

Mmmmmm, NIC

This section reports on a BUFORA NIC (National Investigations Committee) meeting in London on July 5th, which the author missed due to a zen ufology meditation retreat. The koan for study was about Malcolm Robinson, a BUFORA member, using hypnotic regression despite BUFORA's code of practice.

Conference Debates

The meeting involved discussions and debates, including one between Albert Budden and BUFORA Chairman-elect Stan Conway over 'electronic pollution' theories. Gloria Dixon is noted for her role in mediating these disputes.

The 'Tape' Incident

Further excitement occurred at Garfunkels, involving a 'tape' and a conversation with Sue Mantle. It is claimed that the 'Young Celt' (presumably referring to a person involved) was bluffing about recording Sue Mantle's conversation to calm her down. Andy Roberts is mentioned as claiming to have a copy of this tape.

Koan Resolution

The koan is resolved with the assertion that the hypnotic regression practiced is not the forbidden kind, and trust is placed in a future sum of money and a 'great man.'

Mantle Pieces

The ongoing conflict between Philip Mantle and the rest of ufology is described as a continuing tragedy. The 'tape story' is highlighted as one of the year's more hilarious ufological incidents.

Sue Mantle Confronts Matthew Williams

Sue Mantle confronted Matthew Williams on the Michael Aspel TV show, accusing him of making allegations about her husband, Philip Mantle. Williams, who had previously worked for HM Customs and been investigated by 'the government,' agreed to discuss the matter privately.

Allegations and Interrogations

Sue Mantle reportedly unleashed a stream of 'vitriol' at Williams, defending her husband. Williams, accustomed to interrogations, remained impassive.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

Throughout the issue, the editorial stance is one of critical skepticism towards many aspects of ufology. The author frequently uses humor and satire to question the validity of conference presentations, the claims of certain ufologists, and the media's handling of UFO topics. There is a recurring theme of distinguishing between genuine phenomena and hoaxes, or misinterpretations. The author appears to value rigorous research and evidence over speculation and unsubstantiated claims. The issue also highlights the internal politics and interpersonal dynamics within the ufology community, often portraying them with a cynical eye. The role of media in shaping public perception of UFOs is also a significant recurring theme.

This issue of 'The Armchair Ufologist 2' (Volume 11, Issue 2, dated 2002-10-07) is a critical and often sarcastic commentary on personalities, events, and internal politics within the ufology community, with a particular focus on the organization BUFORA.

The Gospel According To Matthew

The author begins by recounting a minor incident involving Matthew Williams, Sir Philip Of Mantilli, and 'Super Sue,' which serves as an example of the need for family protection in the often contentious ufological world. The article then turns to Matthew Williams himself, describing him as a new figure in ufology who has become a sought-after speaker. However, the author is highly critical of Williams' contributions, labeling them as 'sub-Tim Good, sub-standard, subterranean homesick greys rubbish' and suggesting he is trying to take ufology and BUFORA by storm, stirring up trouble.

Ten Things You Neither Knew Nor Cared About Matthew Williams

A list of ten points aims to further characterize Matthew Williams, including a lack of humor, a questionable Welsh accent, being called 'Slick' by friends, taking ufology too seriously, not being likely to join the BUFORA Council, looking like Nick Pope from a distance, talking 'total bollocks,' believing military bases have tunnels relevant to ufology, his magazine 'Truthseekers Review' never finding truth, and thinking he is in 'The X-Files.'

Policy? Put the kettle on!

This section critiques a BUFORA 'Policy Meeting,' which was held on short notice in London. The author suggests that the late notification was a deliberate tactic to prevent dissenters from attending. The event featured a 'trainer' conducting exercises, which the author dismisses as a waste of time, comparing it unfavorably to running a 'multi-national biscuit company' and criticizing BUFORA for engaging in such activities.

I'll Be Your Mirror......

The author expresses concern about a future lack of gossip if BUFORA were to improve. The article then describes the '8th International Bun Fight,' an event where attendance was low, with people preferring 'sun oil to snake oil.'

Movers & Shakers

Richard Conway is mentioned for his efforts in organizing a difficult conference that was 'ill thought out.' Despite his efforts, the author suggests he should 'give ufology up.' The organization of the event was largely handled by IUN.

No Sleep 'til Bedtime

The author admits to not attending many lectures at a weekend event, preferring to socialize. A Friday night gathering included Judith Jaafar, who led community singing. The author, Mike Wootten, and John Spencer engaged in discussions described as 'bollocks about matters ufological.'

UFO politics within BUFORA

The issue of 'Philip' (presumably Philip Mantle) coming to a BUFORA event is discussed, with his attendance being limited due to 'baby sitting problems.' BUFORA presented its 'Investigator Of The Year' award to David Sankey and a 'special' award to Judith Jaafar for attending many ufocons. Jaafar gave a speech about BUFORA's internal politics and infighting.

Bill Of Confusion

This section details a controversy at a conference where attendees were told their hotel B&B would be paid by BUFORA, a tradition at IUN and BUFORA events. However, Mike and Gaynor Wootten were asked to pay their hotel bill, despite assurances from organizer Richard Conway. The author expresses sympathy for Gaynor Wootten, who is unaccustomed to such treatment.

The Mum Conway Incident

Further complicating the expense issue, Fleur Conway, Stan Conway's wife and Richard Conway's mother, informed Mike Wootten that they could not even speak to Richard Conway about the matter, despite him being the organizer. The author notes that Stan Conway is being tipped for BUFORA Council chairmanship, raising concerns about Fleur Conway's potential influence.

The Ego Has Landed

Max Burns is introduced as someone who has been 'covert' for ten years and is full of himself. He discussed a 'crash' retrieval in South Yorkshire but struggled to recall details. Burns dropped a piece of paper with Stanton Friedman's phone number.

Speaking of Stanton

This section speculates on Stanton Friedman's potential role in a hypothetical 'Space Boys' scenario, comparing him to Philip Mantle and Matthew Williams. Max Burns is mentioned again for writing for 'Alien Encounters' magazine, a sister publication to 'Encounters.' The editor of 'Alien Encounters,' Nina Pendred, is described as having experience with a Scuba Diving zine.

Voices Heard

On Friday night, ex-CIA man Derrol Sims was allegedly heard trying to lure girls from 'Encounters' magazine to his room.

BUFORA Babes and the Fife Case

Gloria Dixon and Judith Jaafar of BUFORA recounted a story about the Scottish ufologist McMalcolm of Clan Robinson. Malcolm was scheduled to speak about the 'Fife Case' but was banned by BUFORA high-ups due to 'ethics' and 'morals.' The author disagrees with this decision, suggesting the ban might stem from the case not being true.

The Fife Case Investigation

The author questions the investigation methods used in the Fife Case and expresses cynicism that the witnesses' reluctance to discuss it is because it is untrue. The author speculates that the witnesses may have fabricated the story and are now worried about the consequences.

Send Lawyers, Guns and Money

A video received by the author contains two incidents. The first is Irene Bott confronting Matthew Williams at a Staffordshire UFO Group conference in September 1996 about the word 'BUFORA.' The second incident occurred at the LAPIS conference in November 1996, where Joe Dormer criticized Harry Harris, a solicitor, calling him a 'shit stain on the underpants of ufology.' The author notes that Harris is generally perceived as a man of high virtue.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue is characterized by a highly critical and often sarcastic tone towards individuals and organizations within the ufology community. The author frequently uses humor and personal anecdotes to express skepticism and expose what they perceive as hypocrisy, incompetence, and self-aggrandizement. Key recurring themes include the internal politics and disputes within BUFORA, the personalities of prominent ufologists like Matthew Williams and Philip Mantle, and the questionable nature of some UFO cases and their investigations. The editorial stance is one of cynicism and a demand for greater transparency and integrity, often delivered with a sharp wit.

Title: The Armchair Ufologist
Issue: 2
Date: October 7, 2002 (inferred from footer dates)
Publisher: Magonia
Country: UK
Language: English

This issue of The Armchair Ufologist, presented as 'Sida 21 av 24' through 'Sida 24 av 24', delves into various controversies and personalities within the ufology community. It features a mix of investigative reports, personal accounts, and editorial commentary, often with a critical and sometimes humorous tone.

Key Articles and Reports

Legal Battles and Investigator Disputes

The issue opens with a report on a legal incident involving Malcolm Robinson, described as an 'indefatigable Scottish investigator'. Robinson was reportedly being sued by Falkirk councillor Billy Buchanan. The dispute stemmed from a claim in Robinson's magazine 'Enigmas' that Buchanan had 'entertained' an alien named Zalus in his council chambers at Falkirk Town Hall. Buchanan, however, claimed it was a human named Gerry Rogers who visited him, and that Robinson's false reporting caused him and his family distress for months, leading to him being shouted at in the street. The article notes that Robinson admitted he was wrong, which is considered a risky move when legal professionals are involved, suggesting the outcome would depend on the quality of legal representation.

Tim Matthews and 'Our Secret Technology'

Another section discusses the 'UFO wars in Lancashire' calming down and introduces Tim Matthews, who once lived in a teepee. Matthews is now the proud owner of a book contract for a tome titled 'Our Secret Technology'. The author expresses anticipation for this book, expecting it to cause significant disruption due to the research involved. The piece also mentions that by the time the reader sees this, Tim Matthews will be married to Linda, and humorously questions if they are aware of the divorce statistics among ufologists or the potential for bothersome calls from enthusiasts.

George Wingfield's Letter and Editorial Response

The section titled 'Do They Mean Us?' addresses the reception of the previous issue of TAU (The Armchair Ufologist). While generally well-received, one notable exception was George Wingfield. He sent a strongly worded letter, quoted in full, criticizing the review of his talk on 'Flying Triangles' at the LAPIS conference in Burnley. Wingfield dismissed the content as 'undiluted crap' and accused the editor of being a 'truculent old Marxist' whose attempts at humour resulted in 'abject failure' and 'thinly veiled malice'. He vehemently denied ever saying the craft were alien or extraterrestrial. Wingfield concluded by stating he gave the magazine to his Whippet, who found it unpalatable.

The editor responded by awarding Wingfield the 'send the most stupid letter' competition, ensuring him free copies for life. The editor also humorously answered three questions posed by Wingfield, attributing the answers to Carol Voderman: 1) Yes, money is expected for the publication. 2) Groucho rather than Karl. 3) It was what Wingfield said.

Ufologist Behaving Badly: Stephen Mera

Under the heading 'Ufologist Behaving Badly', the issue focuses on Stephen Mera, described as a BUFORA AI and a steward at their 'Day of Abductions'. Joe Dormer of LAPIS writes to report an incident where Mera allegedly took a letter Dormer had sent for publication in 'NARO Minded' and submitted it to the present editor under his own name. Dormer expresses disbelief at such behavior, questioning if Mera has any original thoughts. The article notes that Andrew Blunn apparently indicated Mera had a history of such actions, which may have led to his removal from NARO. The editor draws parallels to other individuals like Max Burns, Stephen Balon, and Jack A. Nory.

Zine Watch: The Voice and Barry King

The 'Zine Watch' segment reviews 'The Voice', Barry King's intermittent publication. The author refers readers to a Forum article in 'Fortean Times 103' for more information. The editor expresses a personal opinion of Barry King, finding him 'ok' on the phone but disbelieving his statements. The editor criticizes King's latest 'VOICE' for muttering about the difficulty of contacting the author and implying suspicion about the delayed appearance of a review. The editor urges King to 'get a grip' and expresses paranoia about the magazine's time lags.

Conclusion and Editorial Stance

The issue concludes with a plea for subscriptions and an invitation for 'any ufological scandal, gossip or sleaze'. The final, bold statement serves as a humorous disclaimer: "IF YOU CAN'T TAKE A JOKE, YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE JOINED!"

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue include disputes among ufologists, the legal ramifications of ufological claims, the publication and review of ufological literature, and the internal politics of ufological organizations like BUFORA and NARO. The editorial stance is clearly critical, often employing sarcasm and humor to address perceived absurdities, misconduct, and inflated egos within the field. The editor positions himself as an objective, albeit opinionated, commentator who is willing to expose questionable practices and personalities, while also promoting his own publication and engaging with the broader ufological community.