Approche - no 20 21 - 1979

Magazine Overview

Title: OVNI APPROCHE
Issue: Double Issue 20-21
Date: 1979
Type: Magazine
Publisher: Not explicitly stated, but associated with S.V.E.P.S. and SOVEPS.
Country: France
Language: French
ISSN: 0396 339 x
Price: 4F. (single issue), 15F. (annual subscription in France), 20F. (annual subscription abroad).

This issue of OVNI APPROCHE presents itself as exceptional, not necessarily in quality but in its double-volume format and its direct, critical approach to current ufological matters. The editorial committee acknowledges the difficulties faced by small-circulation publications and asserts the continued vitality of their organization, S.V.E.P.S., despite any perceived 'disappearance'. The issue aims to address 'brutal' points and shed light on what they perceive as a somber turn in French ufology, hoping to avoid future polemics.

Editorial Stance and Key Articles

Editorial: "Pour étrangler l'ufologie" (To Strangle Ufology)

The editorial by Frantz CREBELY discusses the shift of UFO interest from France to Italy, noting that French ufologists have had to turn their attention inward. It critiques the period after 1975, where rivalries between major ufology magazines hindered progress. The emergence of numerous private associations, united under federations like CECRU, is seen as a positive development, showing a desire for common work among 'private' ufologists. However, the editorial also points to the interest of government officials and 'swindlers' in the UFO phenomenon.

GEPAN: Its Mysteries and Tactics

This section critically examines GEPAN, the French government's official UFO investigation group. While initially welcomed as a means to allocate resources to UFO research, concerns are raised about its state-controlled nature within CNES, contrasting it with a more liberal university setting. The article expresses hope that GEPAN's engineers are sincere in advancing knowledge without prejudice, but notes several issues. Following an interview in September 1978, GEPAN became largely silent, with only two letters from its new director, Alain ESTERLE, offering optical networks for spectral analysis and requesting studies from private groups. The methodology presented showed little change. A significant concern is that GEPAN might be acting as a mere conduit for data collection, potentially serving discreet military organizations. GEPAN's tactic of relying on the gendarmerie for investigations is discussed, acknowledging the gendarmerie's professionalism but noting their workload and potential military secrecy constraints. The article criticizes GEPAN's public relations approach, suggesting it aims to monopolize ufology and systematically exclude private associations from public discourse.

The "Vendors of Lies"

This section denounces a segment of the ufology community that disseminates misinformation. It criticizes writers who mix UFOs with unrelated topics like archaeology and parapsychology, presenting speculation as fact. It specifically targets 'contactees' who allegedly profit from selling unbelievable stories and 'writers who scavenge ufology' for creating associations under the 1901 law for fiscal benefits, or who criticize private ufology in their books.

"Haro sur l'ufologie privée" (Attack on Private Ufology)

The article argues that private ufology is under threat from both official bodies and commercial entities. It anticipates accusations of jealousy but insists on a deeper analysis: private associations have never been given the resources (time or material) to fulfill their tasks, unlike commercial entities that profit from public naivety or GEPAN which uses state funds. The core argument is that there is a clear intent to 'strangle' private associations. For commercial entities, this is because they are the only ones denouncing their practices, leading to threats and smear campaigns. For official bodies, the aim is to cut off the public, promoting the idea that only official services are serious and to prevent the military from occulting the phenomenon. The article concludes that private associations are the sole guarantors of the public's freedom to know about UFOs and the only obstacle to military secrecy.

"Le naufrage du GEPAN" (The Sinking of GEPAN)

This article recounts participation in a GEPAN-organized meeting in Toulouse on September 12, 1978. The author, along with colleagues from ADEPS, attended with low expectations, which were unfortunately surpassed by the negative experience. Over seven hours, the discourse focused on GEPAN's perceived superiority as professional scientists, dismissing private researchers as unqualified, regardless of their experience. The article highlights the perceived arrogance and condescension of GEPAN representatives, particularly the director, Claude Poher. The author feels the meeting was designed to discourage and demobilize private researchers, serving as a public relations exercise. The lack of transparency regarding the 'Council of Sages' and the scientific committee is noted, with only a slide showing the names of 'scientific attachés' at the end of the session. The article concludes by mentioning Poher's resignation and the lack of a successor or clear future plans for GEPAN, suggesting the organization was in a state of disarray and disappointment.

"Plaidoyer pour la liberté" (Plea for Freedom)

This section reiterates that GEPAN should not be demonized but that its current trajectory warrants concern. The author suggests that GEPAN's engineers, being new to the phenomenon and focused on methodology and credibility, may be insensitive to aspects beyond their immediate 'universe'. It is argued that GEPAN needs a complementary, independent, and university-based entity. The article stresses that GEPAN should not ignore private associations, which, despite representing the past of ufology, are capable of shaping its future. Attacking these associations is seen as short-sighted, as it undermines the freedom of knowledge, criticism, and speech, which are crucial for the public's understanding of UFOs. The author warns that technocracy and 'official scientism' risk killing genuine scientific research through the appropriation and monolithic nature of ideas, explaining the hostility some 'pro-UFO' scientists have towards GEPAN.

"OVNI, ballons-sondes - ne confondez pas" (UFOs, Weather Balloons - Do Not Confuse)

This article, authored by Jean-François Gille, a Doctor of Sciences and researcher at CNRS, aims to clarify common misidentifications of UFOs with natural phenomena, particularly weather balloons. It explains that many surprising natural events can be mistaken for UFOs, including lenticular clouds, ball lightning, and spontaneous luminescence. The focus is on distinguishing UFO sightings from observations of balloons, especially weather balloons (ballons-sondes). The article describes the physical characteristics of balloons, including their spherical or elongated shapes, their typical altitudes, and how they are affected by atmospheric conditions. It then details how light interacts with a balloon's surface, creating various visual effects that can be misinterpreted. The article analyzes four key positions of a balloon relative to an observer and light source, illustrating how these can create illusions of movement, shape, and luminescence that might resemble UFOs. The author emphasizes that the appearance of a balloon can be deceptive, appearing as a flat surface, a disk, or a diffuse glow, especially at high altitudes or in specific lighting conditions.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of OVNI APPROCHE strongly advocates for the preservation and integrity of private ufological research against what it perceives as threats from official government bodies (GEPAN) and commercial exploitation. The editorial stance is critical of GEPAN's methods, transparency, and potential for monopolizing the field, viewing it as a public relations exercise rather than genuine scientific inquiry. There is a clear emphasis on the importance of freedom of knowledge and the role of private associations in safeguarding this freedom. The issue also highlights the need for rigorous, yet independent, scientific investigation, distinguishing between genuine UFO phenomena and misidentifications, particularly those involving balloons. The overall tone is one of concern for the future of ufology, urging vigilance and a defense of its autonomy.

This issue of APPROCHE magazine, dated (issue number 11, date not specified), focuses heavily on international ufology, with a particular emphasis on events and research outside of France. The cover headline, "L'ufologie hors de l'hexagone" (Ufology outside the hexagon), sets the tone for a global perspective on UFO phenomena. The issue includes detailed articles on observations in Spain, Switzerland, New Zealand, and Australia, as well as a piece on scientific approaches to UFOs from the USSR.

Article 1: III - SOUS UN ECLAIRAGE ET SOUS UN SITE INFERIEUR A 45° & IV - SOUS UN ANGLE DE SITE SUPERIEUR A 45 et MEME VOISIN DU ZENITH

These two sections, authored by Marcel Parniere, a Lieutenant-colonel of aviation (retired), describe visual observations of unidentified aerial objects under different lighting and viewing angles. Parniere details how atmospheric conditions and light refractions can create the illusion of specific shapes and movements. He describes an object appearing as a vertical cylinder, emitting light from its base, and exhibiting rapid changes in direction and apparent speed due to air currents and optical effects. Under a higher viewing angle, the object appears as a luminous circle with a dark center, and atmospheric refractions can create the illusion of illuminated windows.

Article 2: Les dix conseils à suivre pour tuer votre association

This satirical piece, originally published in VAR MATIN REPUBLIQUE, offers ten humorous "tips" on how to effectively destroy a local association. The advice includes avoiding meetings, arriving late, criticizing leadership, refusing positions, complaining about the association's activities, delaying dues, and discouraging new members. The underlying message is a critique of negative and unconstructive behavior within organizations.

Article 3: surveillance internationale du ciel - folklore de l'ufologie ?

This article, written by Raoul Robe, secretary of G.P.U.N., discusses the nature of ufological research and the perception of 'sky watching' activities. It contrasts the 'desk ufologists' who theorize with field researchers. The author addresses the criticism that sky watching is 'useless' and 'ineffective,' arguing that while large-scale, fixed detection networks might be impractical, dedicated observation by enthusiasts can still yield valuable data. The article emphasizes the need for a balanced approach to ufology, integrating various research methods and acknowledging the potential for genuine, unexplained phenomena.

Article 4: LE SENS DE L'EFFICACITE

This section questions the effectiveness of various ufological research methods. It highlights that while 'investigation' involves gathering human testimonies, it requires a deep understanding of psychology, meteorology, and astronomy. The author suggests that direct contact with the phenomenon during sightings is crucial for researchers, and that even with limited resources, observations can be significant. The article aims to establish a balanced perspective on the utility of different forms of ufological research.

Article 5: SURVEILLANCES INTERNATIONALES DU CIEL - INTERNATIONAL SKYWATCH 1980

This section announces the dates for the International Skywatch 1980, organized to coordinate sky watching efforts. The chosen dates, spread throughout the year, are aligned with new moon periods to optimize observation conditions. This initiative reflects a desire for organized, collaborative ufological observation.

Article 6: L'ufologie hors de l'hexagone - GRENADE : plus de Gairy, plus d'OVNI !

This article, based on a Newsweek report translated by Michael Klitzke, discusses the political situation in Grenada and the controversial role of its former Prime Minister, Sir Eric Gairy, in advocating for UFO research at the United Nations. Gairy was ousted by rebels led by Maurice Bishop. The article notes Gairy's persistent efforts to establish a UN organization for UFO study, which reportedly surprised and sometimes annoyed international bodies. It also touches upon the "affair of Bass Strait" and a plane disappearance potentially linked to UFOs.

Article 7: TRADUCTEURS, A L'AIDE!

This is a call for volunteers from S.V.E.P.S. and 'APPROCHE' to help translate foreign-language texts (Spanish, Italian, English) related to ufology. The aim is to keep French researchers informed about the latest international developments in the field.

Article 8: coup d'oeil sur l'Espagne

This section provides an overview of the ufological landscape in Spain, noting the quality of publications and the work of prominent researchers like Antonio Ribera and Vicente Juan Ballester Olmos. It mentions the magazine STENDEK and highlights the literary output of authors such as Juan Jose Benitez and Miguel Peyro Garcia. The article also touches upon the formation of associations and the organization of congresses in Spain, suggesting a dynamic and active ufological community.

Article 9: LA PRODUCTION LITTERAIRE (Spain)

This part of the Spanish ufology review details specific literary contributions. Antonio Ribera continues to publish, while journalist Juan Jose Benitez has released three books based on military documents. The STENDEK revue has compiled its main investigations into two volumes. The upcoming book by Miguel Peyro Garcia on psychosociological cases and the 'manual de l'ufologue' by Albert Adell Sabates are also mentioned.

Article 10: LES ASSOCIATIONS (Spain)

This section focuses on ufological associations in Spain. It mentions the C.E.I. as a central body with numerous consultants. It also notes a large number of local and regional associations, as well as publications. The article highlights the prevalence of congresses and symposiums in Spain, contrasting with France's focus on inter-group meetings.

Article 11: LE CONGRES DE BARCELONE

This brief mention refers to a previous congress in Barcelona, noting that the C.E.L. had commented on it, lamenting the mix of scientific researchers and others. It also mentions a congress in Porto and another in Barcelona in 1979, along with national symposiums in Madrid.

Article 12: U.R.S.S. - Des observations d'O.V.N.I. nécessitent des études à l'Académie des Sciences

This article, based on a report from the Russian review 'Nedelya', discusses the Soviet Academy of Sciences' engagement with UFO reports. V. Migoulin and Youri Platov, members of the Academy, explain that they frequently receive reports of atmospheric phenomena, some of which are inexplicable. They cite the Petrozavodsk observation in 1977 as an example of an unexplained event possibly linked to solar activity and ionospheric changes. The authors emphasize that these phenomena deserve scientific study, free from sensationalism, and that organizations within the Academy have been researching these anomalous events for years. They provide the address of the Academy's Department of General Physics and Astronomy for readers to send their reports.

Article 13: SUISSE - Création de l'Association Suisse de Coordination et de Recherches Ufologiques

This article details the formation of a Swiss ufological coordination association, ASCURU, following a meeting in Lausanne on April 21, 1979. Four Swiss ufological groups participated: the Association d'Etude sur les Soucoupes Volantes Suisse (A.E.S.V.), the Groupement Ufologique Bullois (G.U.B.), the Société Lausannoise d'Etude des Phénomènes Spatiaux (S.L.E.P.S.), and an anonymous group. The article outlines the decisions made, including the establishment of a flexible, non-statutory organization with a central bureau in Lausanne, headed by Jacques Iund. Plans include creating a radio-amateur network, standardizing inquiry questionnaires, and exchanging information. The article also reviews past ufological organizations in Switzerland.

Article 14: NOOUVELLE-ZELANDE - AUSTRALIE - CHASSE A L'U.F.O.

This section reports on UFO sightings in New Zealand and Australia. It details observations made on the night of December 20-21, 1978, involving an "Argosy" aircraft. The crew reported seeing unidentified luminous objects, with radar contacts and visual sightings of lights. One incident involved an object moving at an estimated speed of 17,000 km/h. The article also mentions a potential UFO sighting captured on film by reporter Quentin Fogarty in New Zealand.

Article 15: LIVRES PARUS

This section lists recently published books on ufology, including titles from Editions Editorial 71/2 and Plaza y Janes. Notable works include "Los OVNIS EN ESPANA" (Vols I & II), "MANUAL DEL UFOLOGO" by Albert Adell Sabates, and "O.V.N.L.? SI, PERO..." by Miguel Peyro Garcia. It also lists books by Antonio Ribera and Juan Jose Benitez, as well as the revue STENDEK and other publications like "CONTACTOS EXTRATERRESTRES."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the international scope of ufological research, the importance of rigorous scientific investigation, the challenges and methodologies of field observation, and the organizational efforts within the ufological community. The editorial stance appears to favor a serious, scientific approach to unexplained aerial phenomena, encouraging detailed reporting and analysis while cautioning against sensationalism. There's a clear emphasis on sharing information and fostering collaboration among researchers globally.

This issue of "Argosy" magazine, dated January 1979, focuses on a significant wave of UFO sightings that occurred in Italy during the early days of the year. The magazine presents a detailed compilation of these events, alongside other notable UFO-related incidents from around the world.

The January Wave in Italy

The magazine dedicates a substantial portion to cataloging numerous UFO sightings reported across Italy between January 1st and 3rd, 1979. These accounts, condensed by Alessandro Cortellazzi, describe a variety of aerial phenomena.

Key Italian Sightings Include:

• Fano (Pesaro): A luminous globe was seen over the sea, and a simultaneous increase and decrease in electrical light, followed by television transmission interruption, was reported.
• Ancona: A luminous object described as triangular was observed, accompanied by strong west winds.
• Nago and Bolognano di Arco (Trento): An object reportedly landed briefly on a road, startling a couple in a Fiat 128.
• Cento and Bondeno (Ferrara): A luminous, oval-shaped object moved slowly across the sky, leaving a whitish trail.
• Porto Recanati (Macerata): A fireball with intense, intermittent white light was observed for about an hour.
• Acireale and Taormina: A luminous white body, reflecting on the sea, was seen at sunrise, with a smaller red light at its extremity.
• Amalfi (Salerno): A luminous sphere with blue and orange traits, changing shape and intensity, was observed and photographed for over two hours.
• Leonforte (Enna): An object described as red was seen, followed by another larger object that changed color.
• Fossano (Coni): A whitish object with phosphorescent light and a halo was observed.
• Turin: A luminous "lantern" was seen, disappearing and reappearing.
• Catignano (Pescara): People reported seeing a bright object moving slowly.
• Seriate (Bergamo): Two silvery discs with antennae were observed, one larger than the other.
• Sassocorvaro (Pesaro-Urbino): A luminous globe was seen before a large hay fire.
• Carpi (Modena): A luminous ball remained suspended in the sky before disappearing.
• Collecchio (Parme): An intense light became a disc and then disappeared.
• Bergamo: A red object moved back and forth.
• Fabbriche di Vallico (Lucca): An iridescent object with strange light emissions was observed.
• Campocatino (Frosinone): A luminous, incandescent globe appeared, causing electronic devices to malfunction and dogs to howl.
• Sermide and Magnocavallo (Mantua): Two luminous rings emitted a strong reddish light.
• Foligno (Perugia): A luminous body with a dark blue light ascended.
• Milan: A white luminous ball was observed, appearing like a star.
• Torre di Fucecchio (Florence): A luminous globe moved towards a wood, emitting orange light beams.
• Brindisi: Two luminous objects were observed, one stationary and emitting a strange, dazzling light, while the other moved in leaps.
• Maniago (Pordenone): Intense lights were seen and photographed, possibly from an aircraft.
• Reggio Emilia: A round object with slight movements was observed.
• Rome: A luminous object was photographed.
• Benevento: A strong blue light illuminated part of the city during a blackout.
• Bergamo: A silver-colored round object was observed.
• Milan: Multiple reports of a large, luminous object were received.
• Trieste: Hundreds of people observed two luminous objects.
• Gazoldo degli Ippoliti (Mantua): An object with strange light emissions was observed.
• Modena: A UFO was photographed by scientific agents over three hours.
• Caselle (Turin): A luminous lenticular object was photographed.
• Cigliano (Vercelli): A very luminous object was observed.
• Vallagarina (Trente): A luminous sphere with yellow luminescence was observed moving rapidly.

The Argosy Encounter

The magazine also details an incident involving the "Argosy" aircraft, directed by Captain STARTUP, with cameramen M. and Mrs. Crockett. While flying over New Zealand, the aircraft was reportedly "harassed" by six or seven bright, luminous objects. These objects, described as having a yellow-brown, disc-like shape with a radiating band of light and a small dome, appeared at various distances from 16 km to 1.6 km. The objects reportedly followed the plane for about 30 minutes, exhibiting rapid movements and described by Captain Startup as being large enough to be picked up by radar. The film of this encounter was sold to television networks worldwide.

The Disappearance of Frederick Valentich

A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to the disappearance of pilot Frederick Valentich. On October 22, Valentich, a 20-year-old pilot, was flying from Moorabin to King Island in Australia when he reported encountering a UFO. He described the object as playing with him, and despite reporting an engine malfunction, stated he would attempt to reach King Island. His last transmission was followed by 17 seconds of silence, during which a metallic scraping sound was heard. Extensive searches yielded no trace of Valentich or his Cessna 182 aircraft. The article notes several curious aspects of the case, including Valentich's sufficient fuel for a much longer flight and his known interest in UFOs.

Explanations and Theories

Various explanations are offered for the sightings, including balloons, lights from Japanese fishing boats, meteorites, and satellite debris. However, many witnesses found these explanations inadequate. The magazine also touches upon the possibility of UFOs altering the Earth's magnetic field, referencing research conducted by the L.A.C.E.R. organization.

The Pietracamela Incident

Another detailed case involves an electrical power plant in Pietracamela, Italy. On December 24, 1978, controller Benito Franchi experienced a sudden malaise and observed unusual instrument readings, even from a generator that was supposedly disconnected. He then witnessed a luminous object, described as a large sphere emitting intense light, which moved towards the Gran Sasso mountain. His colleague, Guido di Varano, also observed the phenomenon. The incident is noted for its potential to cause inexplicable damage to electrical equipment and possibly alter the Earth's magnetic field.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the widespread nature of UFO sightings, the variety of reported phenomena, and the persistent mystery surrounding these events. The magazine adopts a stance of presenting detailed accounts and investigations, allowing readers to draw their own conclusions, while acknowledging the potential for unusual technological or environmental effects associated with UFOs. The editorial seems to lean towards the belief that these are genuine, unexplained phenomena, rather than dismissing them outright.

This issue of "Approche" magazine, identified as issue number 29, delves into a variety of ufological and scientific topics, with a particular focus on the intersection of unexplained phenomena, scientific investigation, and emerging technologies. The cover boldly proclaims "MARS N'EST PAS UN HASARD" (Mars is Not a Coincidence), signaling a key theme of the issue: the potential relationship between Mars and UFO sightings.

Article 1: Magnetic Indices and OVNI Activity

The first article discusses the measurement of magnetic indices, specifically the K-indices, which are used to record micropulsations. It details an incident near Pietracamela where an OVNI (UFO) passed at low altitude. Despite influencing electrical generators and a witness's nervous system, the event did not register on the sensitive instruments of the magnetic observatory. The K-index recorded was low (2), with deviations of 10-16 on the Bartels scale, far from the maximum intensity of 9 (equivalent to 350 Bartels). The article notes that such low-altitude OVNI passages causing electrical disturbances are a recurring pattern. It also mentions a calculation by Alan Watts suggesting that the force required for such an interaction at 20 meters would be at least 1,800,000 Oersteds. The OVNI's trajectory passed near the astronomical observatory of Campo Imperatore, but it was closed for Christmas, preventing any official observation.

The ufological section of LA.C.E.R. (the center's ufology section) emphasizes the importance of this sighting for obtaining technical data that could lead to conclusions about OVNI propulsion and sustentation systems. They encourage other groups to adopt and develop similar methodologies to move beyond simple, outdated reports.

A document from the Geomagnetic Observatory of "L'Aquila" was attached, providing magnetic readings.

Article 2: The Miguères Case and Editorial Stance

The editorial section addresses the perceived "scandalous" nature of some ufological discourse, advocating for a more positive and balanced approach. It criticizes the tendency towards polemics and denunciations, suggesting that more constructive work is needed. The editorial highlights the "Miguères affair" as an example of a problematic case that requires critical examination.

Perry Petrakis, director of the A.E.S.V. bulletin, explains their decision to dedicate space to disagreeing with certain actions within the ufological community. He states that the A.E.S.V. is taking a personal and balanced stance between the eccentricities of officials and the "garbage disposal" of commercial interests.

The article then details the Jean Miguères case, where Miguères claimed to be in contact with extraterrestrials who saved him from a car accident they allegedly caused. The A.E.S.V. bulletin published a special issue questioning Miguères' claims, particularly regarding the "contact" aspect. The article notes that Miguères' book primarily focuses on the accident and its aftermath. The A.E.S.V. felt compelled to critically examine the case due to three main reasons:

1. To avoid repeating the uncertainties surrounding the G. Adamski case, which could lead to similar issues in the future.
2. The only existing investigation was Miguères' own account, which lacked impartiality.
3. If Miguères was truthful, it would be a turning point for ufology; if it was a hoax, it was important to expose it.

Upon reviewing Miguères' book, the article points out that many cited individuals are anonymous or deceased. It highlights inconsistencies, such as Miguères claiming to see himself in a rearview mirror when the car's mirrors and doors were reportedly destroyed. It also questions Miguères' account of being teletransported with MM. Guieu and Tarade, noting geographical inaccuracies regarding the autoroute route from Nîmes to Marseille. Guieu and Tarade are reportedly suing the A.E.S.V. for 15 million centimes in damages for publishing their letters.

The article also discusses Miguères' claim of receiving a telepathic message about an extraterrestrial base on a planetoid named KRISTCHA, orbiting between Venus and Earth. It contrasts this with the later official announcement of a celestial body discovered by astronomer Charles Kowal, which was located between Earth and Mars. The article suggests Miguères might have learned of the discovery beforehand, possibly through an astronomer friend from his childhood in Algeria who works at the Nice Observatory, thus explaining the orbital error.

Article 3: The "Airship" of 1896-1897 and Mars Oppositions

Antonio Ribera, an author and researcher, presents his findings on the potential connection between Mars and UFO sightings. He notes that many researchers, including Jacques Vallée and Miguel Guasp, have considered this link. Ribera's own research involves comparing UFO case files with astronomical tables of Mars-Earth oppositions.

He discusses the famous "airship" or "space vessel" sightings in the United States in 1896-1897. Ribera verified that Mars was in a nearly aphelic opposition during December 1896, the period of these sightings. He posits that these events might be related to Martian technology.

Ribera also examines the "Year of the Humanoids" in 1973, noting that a significant number of humanoid encounters occurred in October 1973, coinciding with a nearly perihelic opposition of Mars and Earth. He suggests that this correlation is too strong to be mere coincidence, especially considering Guasp's theory about information processing and wave phenomena related to planetary oppositions.

He further analyzes historical cases, including the observation of a "saucer" by John Martin in Texas in 1878, which predates Kenneth Arnold's famous sighting. He also mentions the sighting of two giant "wheels" in the Persian Gulf in 1879, both occurring around Mars oppositions.

Ribera references Jacques Vallée's catalogue of wave phenomena and BUELTA's graphical analysis, showing how UFO observation rates tend to multiply during Mars-Earth oppositions.

Article 4: Directed Energy Weapons and the Future of Warfare

This section, attributed to Jean-Pierre Petit, discusses the alarming development of directed energy weapons, such as lasers and proton cannons. The article notes that these weapons, initially revealed through television programs, are considered by some US military officials to be strategically superior to nuclear weapons.

Petit recounts visiting US laboratories in 1976 and learning about these advanced armaments. He details the rapid progress in laser technology, with installations capable of delivering terawatts of power. He also touches upon the concept of Archimedes using mirrors to set fire to enemy ships, drawing a parallel to modern laser capabilities.

The article highlights the Soviet Union's advancements in magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) and particle cannons. It describes how these weapons can achieve speeds close to the speed of light, making them virtually interceptable. The implications are dire: the potential to destroy adversary satellites and nuclear warheads, rendering traditional nuclear deterrence obsolete. The development of powerful MHD generators, capable of converting bomb energy into electricity with high efficiency, is also mentioned, suggesting a potential shift in the balance of power.

Petit expresses concern about the potential for these weapons to cause global destruction, estimating a 0.3 probability of world war in the next ten years, with an exponentially increasing risk thereafter. He suggests that these weapons could lead to more complete destruction than bombs, likening it to breaking a tree with dynamite.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the investigation of unexplained phenomena (UFOs), the search for scientific explanations, and the potential implications of advanced technology, both extraterrestrial and human-made. The editorial stance, particularly in the second article, advocates for a rigorous, evidence-based, and less sensationalist approach to ufology, emphasizing the importance of freedom of information and the need to expose hoaxes.

The magazine appears to support critical analysis and the pursuit of truth, even when it challenges popular narratives or involves controversial cases. The connection between astronomical events (Mars oppositions) and UFO sightings is presented as a significant area of research, suggesting that seemingly disparate phenomena might be interconnected. The discussion on directed energy weapons introduces a geopolitical and military dimension, raising concerns about a potential arms race and global instability.

This issue of the magazine, identified by its page number '39', focuses on the phenomenon of UFOs (O.V.N.I.) and features an in-depth look at the work of Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, a Spanish ufologist. The publication date is indicated as February 1977, with the primary language being French, though the content originates from Spain.

Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos: A Pioneer in Spanish Ufology

The article introduces Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, born in Valence in 1948. He holds a degree in programming and is an industrial technical engineer with studies in physics and statistics. In February 1968, he founded the C.E.O.N.I. (Circle of Studies on Unidentified Objects), which he led until 1972. Notably, he organized and directed the first seminar on UFOs within the Spanish University framework in November 1968, with the participation of academics and military personnel. He also convened Spanish ufologists in Madrid in October 1969 to coordinate their efforts. Over the years, he has participated in meetings with prominent international ufologists such as Aimé Michel, Jacques Vallée, Claude Poher, Pierre Guérin, Ronald Westrum, and Willy Smith. He served as the Spanish correspondent for Dr. Hynek's Center for UFO Studies (C.U.F.O.S.).

"Disinformation" Editorial

The issue highlights a remarkable and courageous editorial by Ballester Olmos titled "Disinformation," published in Stendek n° 28. In this piece, he addresses the marginalization of UFO studies within academia, despite the scientific methodology being key. He criticizes the underestimation of the UFO phenomenon by responsible scientific figures and its exclusion from laboratories and university symposiums. Ballester Olmos points out that hundreds of scientists and engineers are engaged in analyzing UFO reports, leading to hypotheses that are subject to verification. However, he laments that the UFO field has also attracted unscrupulous individuals, charlatans, mediocre writers, and even paranoid individuals who exploit public interest and the negligence of scientific authorities for personal gain, flooding the market with esoteric literature.

The Spanish Book Market and Ufology

Ballester Olmos criticizes the recent influx of low-value titles in the Spanish market, authored by individuals with poor technical training and superficial knowledge of ufology, motivated solely by profit. He categorizes these authors into several groups: sensationalist journalists, writers who treat UFOs as a lucrative subject, those who link UFOs to unproven archaeological issues and historical legends, and pseudo-philosophers who see extraterrestrials as humanity's salvation. He denounces this "neo-obscurantism" and intellectual banditry, advocating for the study of ufology to be reserved for those with sufficient methodological and scientific training.

He further criticizes commercial publishers for manipulating culture and causing confusion by disseminating unverified information, thereby hindering constructive contributions to resolving the UFO enigma. He urges readers to demand a higher degree of seriousness from the works they purchase and calls on commercial publishers to exercise greater selectivity in disseminating truthful and serious information.

Book Reviews and Ufological Contributions

The issue includes several book reviews, offering critical perspectives on recent publications in the ufology field.

1. "O.V.N.I.: EL FENOMENO ATERRIZAJE" by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos

This book is presented as a comprehensive work on UFOs, described as a "bible of Spanish ufology." The reviewer notes that while the book was written in Spanish, it is so valuable that learning the language is recommended. The reviewer also draws a parallel between Ballester Olmos's meticulous approach and that of naturalist Jean-Henri Fabre, who studied insects with great detail.

2. "O.V.N.I. - L'ARMEE PARLE" by Jean-Claude Bourret

This is Jean-Claude Bourret's fourth book, continuing his method of presenting UFO facts and investigations, particularly those related to the military, with minimal commentary. The review notes that while the title suggests the military is speaking, it's uncertain if they are revealing everything. It mentions the US military's declassification of certain files due to pressure from private associations. The book includes reports from the gendarmerie and statements from C.NE.S. president Hubert CURIEN and GEPAN director Alain ESTERLE. The review ends with a surprising observation about Bourret potentially aligning with a campaign against private associations.

3. "L'AFFAIRE DE GLOZEL" by Nicole Torchet, Patrick Ferryn, and Jacques Gossart

This book revisits the Glozel affair, which gained notoriety in 1924 with the discovery of stones engraved with unknown characters. The discovery challenged prevailing theories about the origins of civilization, leading to attempts to discredit Glozel as a fabrication. The book impartially describes the events and highlights how thermoluminescence dating now allows for more reliable dating of the engravings. While the enigma of the civilization remains, the authenticity of the stones is considered certain.

4. "LES DERNIERES PROPHETIES POUR L'OCCIDENT" by Guy Tarade

This book presents dire prophecies concerning global seismic events, wars, and extraterrestrial invasions by 1999. The reviewer describes Guy Tarade as a "tracker of the Mysterious Unknown" and a harbinger of bad news, noting that Tarade has compiled and analyzed prophecies from various historical figures.

5. "AUX LIMITES DE LA REALITE" by J. Allen Hynek & Jacques Vallée

This book, the original edition of "The edge of reality," is reviewed critically. While the initial synthesis of UFO knowledge is considered well-done for the under-informed, it is found to be unoriginal for seasoned ufologists. The reviewer criticizes the authors for straying beyond the book's title and delving into sterile discussions, adding to the existing body of ufological fantasies rather than providing new insights.

6. "ALERTE GENERALE O.V.N.I." by Leonard STRINGFIELD

This book covers the UFO wave that submerged the USA in the autumn of 1973. Leonard Stringfield, a veteran ufologist who personally encountered a UFO in 1945, is presented as an active "UFO hunter." The review notes his past directorship of C.R.I.F.O. and his collaboration with Donald E. Keyhoe at N.I.C.A.P. The book is described as having a curious structure but offers interesting content, including significant cases not widely known in France and a documented presentation of the government's secrecy regarding UFOs. It also touches upon the topic of "little green men" from Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

7. "LA MEMOIRE DES O.V.N.I. - Des Argonautes aux Extra-terrestres" by Jean BASTIDE

Jean Bastide's work is praised for its considerable effort in delving into legends, folklore, religious history, and myths to extract UFO-related elements. The book alternates between recounting legendary facts and presenting UFO testimonies without extensive commentary. The reviewer finds the book enjoyable, appreciating its erudition and the symbolic richness of the narratives, which connect ancient knowledge to the UFO phenomenon. The author suggests that UFOs, changing colors, intermittent appearances of "gods," and unique flight characteristics are recurring themes found in various accounts.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical analysis of ufology, the challenges posed by disinformation and sensationalism in UFO literature, and the importance of scientific rigor in studying the phenomenon. The editorial stance, as expressed by Vicente-Juan Ballester Olmos, is one of advocating for a more serious, evidence-based approach to ufology, distinct from speculative or profit-driven endeavors. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing credible research from unsubstantiated claims and on promoting objective information dissemination. The reviews of various books highlight the ongoing debate and diverse perspectives within the ufological community, from historical analysis to contemporary sightings and potential extraterrestrial contact.