1957 10 00 Amazing Stories - special UFO Issue

Magazine Overview

Title: AMAZING STORIES
Issue Date: October 1957
Volume: 31
Issue Number: 10
Publisher: Ziff-Davis Publishing Company
Cover Price: 35¢
Cover Headline: IS THE GOVERNMENT HIDING SAUCER FACTS? Raymond Palmer Says, Yes!

This issue of Amazing Stories is dedicated to the topic of flying saucers, presenting a collection of articles that explore sightings, alleged government cover-ups, and the broader implications of these phenomena. The cover prominently features an illustration of flying saucers and a jetliner, setting the tone for the issue's focus.

Feature Articles and Content

"Is the Government Hiding Saucer Facts?" by Raymond Palmer

This lead article, authored by the magazine's editor, Raymond Palmer, presents a strong assertion that the U.S. government is deliberately concealing information about flying saucers. Palmer claims that over ten years of investigation have convinced him of this fact, not as an opinion, but as a matter of personal experience. He outlines two primary reasons for this alleged secrecy: the need to prevent public panic during a potential inimical invasion, and the military practice of "classification" which can be easily misused to cover up mistakes or ignorance. Palmer argues that the handling of flying saucer information is primarily a military affair, and that the political elements of the government are often as uninformed as the public.

He recounts his own experiences, including being told to "kill" a story about flying saucers that he had secured exclusively for Amazing Stories, which was later published in Fate magazine. This led to intense questioning by military intelligence, who invariably denied the existence of flying saucers. Palmer also details an incident where Army officials confiscated photographic evidence of flying saucers taken in Phoenix, Arizona, in 1947, even going door-to-door to collect copies of the newspaper that published the photos. He attributes this suppression to a fear of public reaction, stemming from Orson Welles' "War of the Worlds" broadcast.

Palmer highlights the vast amount of information available in published books and articles, often more detailed than classified military files, questioning the validity of continued secrecy. He mentions President Eisenhower's non-committal response when asked about flying saucers. Furthermore, Palmer discusses the suppression of news by wire services and newspapers, often due to pressure from sources like the Pentagon. He cites the example of a Pan-American Airliner crew's sighting of a UFO in March 1957, which was initially reported but later countered by a statement from Dr. Hugh Dryden of the National Committee on Aeronautics, who dismissed such phenomena as meteorites.

Palmer also touches upon the experiences of individuals like Frank Edwards, who allegedly lost his newscasting job for discussing flying saucers, and Dr. Herman Oberth, a respected scientist whose lips were sealed upon his arrival in the U.S. and employment at Redstone Arsenal. Palmer concludes that the government's secrecy is poorly executed and questions whether people will believe them if they ever decide to reveal the truth. He personally believes flying saucers are real and not a menace, based on his own six sightings and thousands of others.

"Outer Space Saucers—A Myth!" by Oliver P. Ferrell

This article presents a contrasting view, arguing that flying saucers are a myth. While the details are not fully provided in the scanned pages, the title suggests a skeptical perspective on the extraterrestrial origin of these phenomena.

"The Aliens Are Among Us!" by Gray Barker

This piece, by Gray Barker, explores the idea that aliens are present among us, suggesting a more direct and potentially concerning aspect of the flying saucer phenomenon.

Other Contributions:

• "If These Be Gods" by Gordon Javlyn: A fictional or speculative piece.
• "Farewell to Glory" by Ellis Hart: Another fictional contribution.
• "The Saucers Still Patrol Our Skies" by Kenneth Arnold: Likely an account from the famous Kenneth Arnold, who investigated saucer sightings.
• "Historical Aspect of the Saucers" by Richard S. Shaver: This article delves into the history of saucer reports.
• "Let's Get Down to Facts" by Mary Grabkowicz: A piece aiming to present factual information.
• "The Air Force Story" (First and Second Reports): These reports likely detail official Air Force investigations or statements regarding flying saucers.
• "We Need Not Fear the Aliens" by Rev. Neal Harvey: This article offers a reassuring perspective on the potential presence of aliens.

Editorial Stance and Themes

The magazine's editorial stance, as represented by Raymond Palmer's lead article, is one of deep suspicion regarding government transparency on the topic of flying saucers. The issue champions the idea that these phenomena are real and that official channels are actively engaged in a cover-up. The recurring themes include government secrecy, military intelligence, the reality of flying saucers, potential alien visitation, and the public's right to know. The issue seems to lean towards sensationalism and the promotion of unexplained phenomena, consistent with the magazine's genre.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of Amazing Stories strongly advocates for the reality of flying saucers and posits that governmental and military bodies are actively engaged in a cover-up. The editorial stance, particularly through Raymond Palmer's extensive article, is critical of official denials and suppression of evidence. The magazine appears to be a platform for those who believe in the existence of UFOs and are skeptical of official explanations, framing the phenomenon as a significant, albeit hidden, aspect of modern life. The inclusion of various articles, from those supporting the existence of aliens to those questioning the 'myth' of saucers, suggests an exploration of different facets of the UFO debate, but with a clear emphasis on the sensational and unexplained.

This issue of Amazing Stories, dated 1957, features a prominent cover story by Kenneth Arnold titled "THE SAUCERS STILL PATROL OUR SKIES." The magazine focuses on UFO phenomena, presenting firsthand accounts and expert opinions.

The Saucers Still Patrol Our Skies by Kenneth Arnold

Kenneth Arnold, born in 1915 in Minnesota, recounts his experiences and reflections on the flying saucer phenomenon ten years after his initial sighting. He details his background, including his education, athletic career, and business ventures in fire-fighting apparatus and uranium prospecting. Arnold emphasizes that his sighting gave him "one real satisfaction - nobody's knocked them out of the air, nor the props out from under my story!" He expresses regret for comparing the objects to "saucers flying through the air," which led to him being the butt of jokes.

Arnold clarifies the basic facts of his sighting to correct distortions, noting that Amazing Stories, under editor Ray Palmer, was the first publication to give his story serious consideration. He contrasts this with magazines like LIFE and TIME, which he felt lacked the imagination to explore such phenomena.

On June 24, 1947, after finishing work for the Central Air Service at Chehalis, Washington, Arnold took off in his private plane with the intention of flying to Yakima. He was delayed by a search for a missing Marine transport near Mt. Rainier. Flying towards Mt. Rainier at an altitude of about 9,500 feet, he observed a chain of nine peculiar aircraft.

These objects were approaching Mt. Rainier rapidly and appeared to be jet planes. They moved in a way that caused the sun to reflect off them, making them difficult to identify. Arnold observed their outlines against the snow, noting the absence of tails and assuming they were a new type of jet. He decided to clock their speed using Mt. Rainier and Mt. Adams as reference points.

At approximately three minutes to three P.M., Arnold observed the first object pass the southern edge of Mt. Rainier. He estimated their elevation to be around a thousand feet difference, but generally at his own altitude. The objects flew in a diagonal, chain-like line, swerving between mountain peaks. Arnold was particularly bothered by the lack of tails on these aircraft.

He estimated his distance from the objects to be between twenty and twenty-five miles, noting they were large enough to be observed clearly at that distance. He compared their span to that of a DC-4 aircraft, judging them to be smaller than the DC-4 but with a span as wide as its farthest engines. The more he observed them, the more unsettled he became, as he was familiar with most aircraft.

Arnold observed the chain of objects passing between Mt. Rainier and Mt. Adams. He measured the distance across the ridge to be approximately five miles, concluding the chain of objects was at least five miles long. He determined that the objects traveled the distance from the crest of Mt. Rainier to the crest of Mt. Adams in one minute and forty-two seconds. Using a map and measuring from the bases of the mountains, he calculated the distance to be 39.8 miles, resulting in a speed of about 1350 miles per hour. He later revised this estimate to over 1800 miles per hour, considering it conservative.

Arnold's complete observation lasted between two and a half to three minutes. When flying straight and level, the objects appeared as thin black lines, and their size was only discernible when they flipped. All but one were saucer-shaped; one was crescent-shaped. He notes that since his 1947 sighting, he has observed similar objects and even obtained movie films, confirming his initial experience. He believes that after ten years, it is incredible for anyone to doubt the existence of these flying saucers.

Arnold shares further reflections, including his trip to Tacoma, Washington, paid for by Ray Palmer, to investigate a story he considers more fantastic than his own. He mentions the deaths of Brown and Davidson and Ray Palmer's assertion that nobody would capture a flying saucer. Arnold dismisses stories of landings and abductions as "put up or shut up."

He firmly states that flying saucers are real, citing information shared with Congress by experts. He speculates about government secrecy but believes the public is entitled to know if these objects are from other planets or star systems. Arnold has shared his story widely without causing panic, finding that people believe him.

He notes that many pilots are familiar with sky mysteries and have seen these phenomena. Arnold believes there are several different kinds of UFOs, some mechanical and some possibly living creatures. He is convinced that the chain of nine objects he saw over Mt. Rainier were definitely aircraft.

Arnold concludes that little definitive nature has been added to his 1947 report. He acknowledges efforts to make money from the subject and the presence of "crackpots" but maintains his personal conviction based on his experience. He is now focused on his uranium prospecting business, finding it a better way to make money than pursuing the saucer phenomenon. He feels the flying saucer is becoming more respectable and its impact on civilization is profound, forcing humanity to think about its place in the universe and the possibility of not being alone.

The Aliens Are Among Us by Gray Barker

This section introduces Gray Barker, described as a "big name" in the UFO field and primarily a businessman involved in film booking. Barker became convinced of the extraterrestrial nature of saucers after a local incident and believes his conviction is supported by the sales of his book, "They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers." He is planning a more sensational book and publishes "The Saucerian," a bi-monthly magazine.

The article then recounts the experience of Mr. and Mrs. Clarence Harvey on July 2, 1950. While fishing in Sawbill Bay, near Steep Rock Lake, Ontario, Canada, they experienced a peculiar, noiseless vibration. Looking out over the bay, they saw a large, shiny circular object resting on the water. Harvey described it as two big saucers stuck together, with portholes and a rotating hoop-shaped antenna. Ten figures, described as moving like robots, were on the machine's surface. One figure, wearing a red skull cap, seemed to be directing the operation, while others wore dark blue caps. The figures were dressed in shiny metallic and dark material, with faces that appeared blank.

The Harveys felt they were witnessing something that didn't belong on Earth and wanted to leave quickly but feared being seen. They noted the figures' automaton-like locomotion. The article suggests these beings might be from inside the craft observed by Arnold.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine strongly supports the reality of UFO sightings and the importance of investigating them, as evidenced by its publication of Kenneth Arnold's detailed account and Gray Barker's research. There is a clear stance against dismissing the phenomenon as mere fantasy or hoaxes, with a particular emphasis on firsthand witness testimony. The articles suggest a potential for extraterrestrial visitation and hint at government secrecy surrounding the topic. The editorial tone encourages open-mindedness and serious consideration of UFO evidence, positioning Amazing Stories as a platform for such investigations, distinct from mainstream publications that may lack imagination or a willingness to explore these subjects.

This issue of Amazing Stories, identified by its cover headline "THE ALIENS ARE AMONG US" and page number 85, presents a collection of purported encounters with extraterrestrial beings and their craft. The content is primarily focused on UFO sightings and alleged interactions with non-human entities, drawing from incidents primarily in the 1950s, but also including one from 1889.

The Harveys' Encounter

The issue begins with an account from Mr. and Mrs. Clarence Harvey, whose names are fictionalized to protect their privacy. They describe observing a machine with small figures that seemed to be engaged in examining water from a lake. The figures walked with an unusual gait, and the machine itself exhibited strange movements. After a deer briefly captured their attention, the figures resumed their activities. The machine then ascended about eight feet, tilted at a 45-degree angle, and departed with a "swoosh." The author notes the similarity of this account to science fiction stories.

The Steep Rock Iron Mines Incident

An account is presented from a senior employee of the Steep Rock Iron Mines, whose story was published in the company's house magazine, the Steep Rock Echo. The employee, whose name was omitted, reported seeing strange flying objects around the same date as the Harveys' experience. The author of the article expresses belief in the story, citing a personal experience where something from space landed near his backyard, scaring neighbors. He has since investigated similar happenings and believes Earth is under surveillance by alien intelligences that may have landed.

The Brush Creek Case

John Q. Black and his partner, John J. Van Allen, who operated titanium diggings near Brush Creek, California, reported seeing a saucer-shaped object on April 20, 1953. About a month later, on May 20, Black discovered a similar object hovering nearby. On June 20, Black had a close encounter with a small, four-foot-tall man dressed in green trousers, a jacket, and a tie. The man was pale, broad-shouldered, and walked stiffly. Black observed the man filling an unusual, shiny metal bucket from the creek. The man then entered a machine, described as two saucers joined together, about eight feet in diameter and four and a half feet thick, with a shiny metallic color. The craft took off with a hissing noise, with no visible means of propulsion. Black's story was reported by news wires, attracting crowds to Brush Creek, though no further sightings occurred. Despite initial skepticism, residents vouched for the miners' integrity, noting they were not heavy drinkers.

Venezuelan Encounters

The issue details two incidents in Venezuela. In Caracas, on November 28, 1953, Gustavo Gonzales and Jose Ponce, operating a grocery delivery service, encountered a luminous sphere blocking their path. They also saw a dwarf-like creature. Gonzales attempted to capture the creature, noting its unusual lightness and hardness. The creature pushed Gonzales away. Meanwhile, two other little men emerged from bushes, holding handfuls of earth. Ponce retreated, and Gonzales was attacked by another dwarf-like creature. Gonzales' knife failed to penetrate its skin. A third creature emerged with a tube-like weapon that emitted a blinding light, incapacitating Gonzales. The creatures then entered the sphere and departed. The men reported the incident to police, who initially thought they were drunk.

Another Venezuelan incident occurred in 1954, where Jose Parra, a jockey from Valencia, encountered a disk-shaped contraption hovering about 10 feet above the ground. Six hairy little men were loading rocks onto the craft. When Parra was spotted, one of the men pointed an instrument at him, emitting a violet light that paralyzed him. The men then entered the saucer and flew away.

The Oliver Larch Disappearance

An older case from December 24, 1889, in South Bend, Indiana, involves the disappearance of 11-year-old Oliver Larch. Sent to fetch water, he screamed for help, but was never found. His tracks ended abruptly near the well, with no sign of struggle. The family searched for years without success.

The Marshall, Michigan Incident

In May 1956, near Marshall, Michigan, three youths—Otto Collins, Herman Williams, and Philip Williams—reported a frightening encounter. Philip saw a huge figure lurking in the shadows. The creature, described as huge and hairy with big green eyes, grabbed two of the youths. Herman, attempting to help, used car headlights to illuminate the creature, which appeared startled and dropped one of the youths. The creature retreated into the shadows. Otto described the creature's eyes as "big as light bulbs."

The Flatwoods Monster

The article then discusses the "Flatwoods Monster" incident, which occurred in late summer 1952 near Sutton, West Virginia. Seven witnesses reported seeing a fiery object land on a hill. Investigating, a group including children and a 17-year-old youth, accompanied by Mrs. Kathleen May, encountered a glowing sphere and a tall, hooded figure with a round, red face and "greenish-orange" beams of light emanating from eye-like openings. The figure was described as dark and hoodlike, with terrible claws. The witnesses experienced a strong odor described as "burning metal" before retreating. The author, after investigating the scene himself, became convinced the story was true.

Other Reports and Author's Conviction

The author mentions other reports, including one from Carora, Venezuela, where four little men attacked two teenagers, and another from Valencia, Venezuela, involving a disk-shaped contraption and hairy little men. He acknowledges that many flying saucer accounts are difficult to believe but is convinced of the truth of the Flatwoods incident based on his neighbors' testimonies and his own investigation. He also notes that the alien beings encountered were often described as small and concerned with collecting samples of soil and water, raising the question of whether they might eventually turn their attention to collecting specimens of humans.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, alien encounters, and unexplained phenomena. The magazine presents these accounts with a degree of seriousness, suggesting that while they may sound like science fiction, there is a possibility of their factual basis. The author's personal conviction, particularly regarding the Flatwoods incident, lends weight to the presented narratives. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded investigation into reports of the unexplained, encouraging readers to consider the possibility of extraterrestrial visitation and its implications for humanity.

This issue of Amazing Stories, with the cover headline "THE ALIENS ARE AMONG US," delves into the historical and contemporary aspects of flying saucers and potential extraterrestrial visitation. The content is primarily composed of two lengthy articles: "HISTORICAL ASPECT OF THE SAUCERS" by Richard S. Shaver and "OUTER SPACE SAUCERS—A MYTH!" by Oliver P. Ferrell.

Historical Aspect of the Saucers by Richard S. Shaver

Richard S. Shaver begins by asserting that true knowledge comes from doing, not just accepting established dogma. He claims to have written about flying saucers before they were widely known, facing misunderstanding but also gaining appreciation from readers who felt he provided something unique. Shaver recounts his personal experience of seeing flying saucers twenty years prior, which he describes not as solid objects but as 'projections,' akin to a television broadcast. He distinguishes these from real space ships that he believes do visit Earth.

Shaver posits that space travel predates the pyramids and cites Charles Fort's work. He mentions the "Oer Linda Boek" as a source that discusses flying saucers in ancient Atlantis, dating its sinking to 2139 B.C. He also points to biblical accounts, such as Ezekiel's experience and Elijah's 'flaming chariot,' as evidence of ancient aerial phenomena. Further historical examples include ancient Indian records of gravity-defying aircraft, and sightings of huge airships in America over a hundred years ago and more recently in Farmington, New Mexico.

He argues that legends of magic carpets, winged horses, and whirlwinds are echoes of a super civilization. The destruction of ancient Babylon by aircraft spitting 'fiery death' and dropping bombs, and the discovery of fused sand and melted stone walls in ruined cities destroyed multiple times, are presented as evidence of advanced ancient technology.

Shaver suggests that the 'flying saucer' phenomenon is not new and that much of history is found in concealed legends. He references Jonathan Swift's description of Mars's two moons centuries before they were confirmed, implying a source of knowledge beyond conventional means. He believes these moons are 'satellite vehicles' made of metal. Shaver concludes that humanity's ego prevents it from accepting the evidence of other intelligent life. He warns against waiting to see a saucer, as it might be a deliberate illusion, and advises examining historical, legendary, and anthropological records. He believes these phenomena will continue to exist and will only interact if seriously interfered with, potentially rewriting human history to our detriment.

Shaver expresses concern about people who claim to have traveled in flying saucers and preach messages of peace and love, suggesting they are deceived by instruments and energies they don't understand. He questions why these beings would offer aid now if they haven't in thousands of years. He asserts that saucers are real, present in our skies, and have no intention of interacting with us. They are products of intelligent races far beyond human capability, not angels, spirits, or beings from other dimensions, but other favored human races. He hopes for a future contact that would enrich human lives.

Outer Space Saucers—A Myth! by Oliver P. Ferrell

Oliver P. Ferrell, credited with discovering radar detection of meteor trails and working on Air Force projects evaluating radio observations of UFOs, presents a contrasting, skeptical view. He recounts attending a lecture in New York by two 'saucer experts' who claimed personal contact with extraterrestrials. Ferrell found their presentation lacking any tangible evidence, comparing it unfavorably to Dorothy's adventures in Oz.

Ferrell dismisses the common claim of government suppression of facts as a 'canard.' He argues that the government, specifically the Air Force, is actively investigating these phenomena, expending resources to track mirages, optical illusions, and weather balloons. He notes that the authorities are publishing their findings, making them available for public study, and suggests there is no hidden intrigue.

He then analyzes the 'incontestable evidence' for flying saucers. Regarding the 'men in black coats' who allegedly interview witnesses, Ferrell notes that these agents are never actually seen, and the evidence for their existence relies on hearsay. He likens the 'solid evidence' of their existence to proof of innocence in a murder case – weak.

Concerning tangible evidence like 'pieces of smashed ships' or 'skeletons of small space dwellers,' Ferrell finds it equally dubious. He recounts a story of a witness who allegedly stole spaceship furniture, only to lose it later. He questions the credibility of such claims.

Ferrell addresses the 'dead-body bit,' stating that while books claim on-the-spot accounts of extraterrestrial deaths, no one in government, research, or even insane asylums has ever seen such a body. He also critiques the interpretation of Project Blue Book, a famous Air Force report on UFOs. Rumors suggest it proves alien existence, but Ferrell, speaking from personal knowledge, states the report is an expansion of publicly released information and concludes that no evidence of extraterrestrial existence was found.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine presents two opposing viewpoints on flying saucers and alien visitation. Richard S. Shaver champions the historical reality of these phenomena, suggesting they are evidence of advanced, possibly terrestrial or other human, civilizations and a long-standing presence of non-human intelligence. His stance is one of acceptance and historical interpretation, leaning towards the idea that these are real, albeit mysterious, visitors. Oliver P. Ferrell, on the other hand, adopts a critical and skeptical stance, debunking common claims and emphasizing the lack of credible evidence. He advocates for a rational approach, trusting official investigations and dismissing sensationalist accounts. The magazine, by featuring both perspectives, allows readers to engage with different interpretations of the UFO phenomenon, though Ferrell's article, presented as a counterpoint to the prevailing 'myth,' suggests a leaning towards critical analysis over unverified claims.

This issue of AMAZING STORIES features a prominent article titled "LET'S GET DOWN TO FACTS" by Mary Grabkowicz, which advocates for a rational and evidence-based approach to the subject of flying saucers and unidentified flying objects (UFOs). The magazine also includes a report from the Air Force on their investigations into UFOs.

LET'S GET DOWN TO FACTS by Mary Grabkowicz

Mary Grabkowicz begins by observing that many writers in the "Saucer forum" are overly burdened with personal opinion and bias. She positions her article as an attempt to present a balanced perspective, stating that she is not overly opinionated but believes available facts have not been properly evaluated. She suggests that truth can be reached through intelligent investigation.

The author calls for a "court of arbitration" to settle the case between those who have contacted "The People" (individuals who claim to have seen or traveled in spacecraft not manufactured on Earth) and the "scoffers." She notes that this year marks the tenth anniversary of the first sighting of the "illusive saucer." Grabkowicz mentions that "saucerers" have decided their group is large enough to elect a President, naming Mr. George Van Tassel as their chosen candidate. These individuals are reportedly seeking public attention and urging intensive investigation of UFOs.

Grabkowicz points out that even conservative newspapers like The New York Times and the Herald-Tribune have given space to these reports, sometimes editorializing on the probability of flying discs. She contrasts the "saucerers" with "scoffers" like Lester del Rey and L. Sprague de Camps, who dismiss the phenomenon as "irritating nonsense." She reassures readers that mental hospitals are not filled with UFO sighters, implying that claims are not necessarily indicative of mental illness.

She then discusses the speed of modern travel, comparing a jet pilot's three-hour transcontinental flight to Dan Fry's alleged thirty-two-minute saucer journey. She argues that in the context of modern technological advancements, Fry's claim, while extraordinary, is not as fantastic as it might have seemed a century ago. She emphasizes the need for a disinterested group to act as arbiters to unearth the truth about saucerer statements, suggesting this approach aligns better with scientific training than ridicule.

Grabkowicz delves into the nature of generalized opinions, attributing their rapid spread to mass communication. She suggests that individuals who gain prominence through persuasive speaking can gather followers, regardless of the rationality of their claims. This tendency to "belong" is universal, affecting physicists and engineers just as it does others. She notes that a predominant group of "saucerers" have mechanical and engineering training.

The article touches upon historical instances of mass psychological phenomena, suggesting that beliefs within such movements tend to be standardized. However, she contrasts this with the varied descriptions of "The Intelligences" and "The People" reported by different saucerers, questioning the consistency and logic of these accounts. She specifically questions the need for thirty-two eyes on creatures described as peace-loving and brotherly, and their ability to locomote by levitation without legs.

Despite these critical observations, Grabkowicz advocates for an open mind, warning against forming judgments before all facts are known. She playfully suggests that UFOs could be birds dislodged by the atom bomb or birds with an explorative urge. She also notes that the flight of helicopters, with their vertical axis propulsion, is similar to how birds fly, questioning if humans are copying nature's designs.

Returning to Dan Fry and George Van Tassel, she states that the burden of proof should not solely rest on the discoverers. She uses the analogy of seeing a strange fish or a mermaid, where the burden of proof would fall on the observer to provide evidence. She questions why saucerers should not be treated with similar courtesy, suggesting that believing them to be insane or seeking a fast buck is unfair.

Grabkowicz introduces a principle from Herbert Spencer: "condemnation prior to investigation." She believes this is a barrier to information and a product of a "I-don't-want-to-be-mentally bothered" attitude. She laments that instead of investigating, society uses ridicule to silence "mental pioneers."

She proposes two tests to sift truth from storytelling: first, a lie detector test administered by an experienced analyst to indicate sincerity; and second, hypnosis by a reputable psychiatrist to question individuals who claim to have traveled in spacecraft. She urges "pioneers" to come forward and help clarify the "muddled morass of thinking."

THE AIR FORCE STORY

This section presents a report from the Air Force, in response to a request from the Editor of Amazing Stories, granting permission to publish certain reports. Major Robert F. Spence, Deputy Chief of the Operations Branch, states that the Air Force has no objection to publishing reports furnished by Captain O'Connor, believing they will help undecided readers reach a decision on UFOs.

FIRST REPORT

The Air Force acknowledges a "definite obligation to identify and analyze things that happen in the air that may have in them menace to the United States." To this end, they established the Unidentified Flying Object Program in 1947. The program documented a peak of 1,700 sightings in 1952, which dropped to 429 in 1953.

From a survey of the volume of sightings, the Air Force determined that over 80 percent are explainable as known objects. These generally fall into categories such as balloons, aircraft, astronomical bodies, atmospheric reflections, and birds. All reports result from either radar or visual sightings.

Explanations for radar sightings include:
1. Temperature inversion reflections: These can create sharp radar returns, appearing to move in all directions at various speeds. An incident in January 1951 near Oakridge, Tennessee, involved two Air Force aircraft attempting to intercept such an "object" at 7,000 feet, which radar indicated was at an elevation of 10 to 25 degrees.
2. Ionized clouds: These can cause unidentified radar returns.
3. Other radar phenomena: Thunderstorms, ice formations, balloons, ground reflections, frequency interference, and windborn objects can also produce confusing radar signals.

Explanations for visual sightings include:
1. Present-day jet aircraft: Flying at high speeds and altitudes, these are often mistaken for unknown objects.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine appears to adopt a stance that encourages critical thinking and evidence-based analysis of UFO phenomena, while also acknowledging the possibility of genuine mysteries. The editorial tone, particularly in Grabkowicz's article, is one of skepticism towards unsubstantiated claims but also a strong rejection of outright dismissal without investigation. The inclusion of the Air Force report provides a counterpoint, detailing official efforts to explain sightings through conventional means. The magazine seems to aim for a balanced perspective, presenting both the claims of believers and the findings of investigators, encouraging readers to form their own informed opinions.

This issue of AMAZING STORIES features a comprehensive report from the U.S. Air Force on their investigation into Unidentified Aerial Objects (UFOs), alongside an article exploring the spiritual implications of alien encounters.

Air Force Report: "Second Report" (Pages 5-9, 119-123)

The core of this issue is the "Second Report" detailing the Air Force's extensive study of UFOs, initiated in 1947. The investigation, conducted by a private scientific group under the Air Technical Intelligence Center at Dayton, Ohio, spanned over seven years. The report's primary conclusion, as stated by Secretary of the Air Force Donald A. Quarles, was that "no objects such as those popularly described as flying saucers have overflown the United States." He expressed certainty that even the small percentage of cases that remained unexplained could have been accounted for with more complete observational data.

The report identified several common sources of misidentification:

• Aircraft: Sunlight reflections from polished surfaces and exhaust trails were often mistaken for UFOs. New lighting systems on commercial and military aircraft, featuring red and white flashing lights, were also a frequent cause of misinterpretation.
• Weather Balloons: Balloons launched to high altitudes (40,000 feet and above) for weather research were a significant source of reports. These balloons, made of reflective materials and sometimes carrying lights, were visible at extreme altitudes.
• Astronomical Phenomena: Bright meteors and planets, particularly Venus when low on the horizon, could appear to move erratically due to atmospheric conditions and lead to misidentification.
• Reflections: The report suggested that some peculiar cases involved reflections from objects rather than actual unidentified craft. Similar to how a mirror can create a reflection, light sources could reflect off various atmospheric elements or objects, creating illusions of movement and speed.

The Air Force highlighted the challenges in evaluating UFO reports, noting that most data consisted of impressions and interpretations rather than reliable measurements. This subjectivity limited the drawing of significant conclusions. To address this, a detailed questionnaire was developed to standardize reports and gather crucial data such as size, shape, composition, speed, altitude, direction, and maneuver pattern.

Photographic evidence was also discussed. The majority of photographs were deemed non-conclusive due to the ease with which they could be faked or retouched. While moving pictures were considered more difficult to fake, the few received by the Air Force only showed pinpoints of light that were too small to analyze properly.

The report detailed the statistical breakdown of identified cases over different periods. For instance, in the first four months of 1955, only three percent of 131 sightings were listed as unknown. By the period of January 1 to May 5, 1955, the breakdown was:

• Balloons: 26%
• Aircraft: 21%
• Astronomical: 23%
• Other: 20%
• Insufficient Information: 7%
• Unknown: 3%

The Air Force acknowledged the development of new aviation technologies, such as vertical-rising aircraft and disc-shaped concepts like the AVRO project. However, they stressed that these were direct descendants of conventional aircraft and should not be considered supernatural. The department committed to informing the public about these developments to prevent them from being mistaken for UFOs.

Ultimately, the study concluded that it was "highly improbable that reports of unidentified aerial objects examined in this study represent observations of technological developments outside of the range of present-day scientific knowledge." The report emphasized a "complete lack of any valid evidence of physical matter in any case of a reported unidentified aerial object."

We Need Not Fear the Aliens (Pages 10, 124)

This article features the perspective of Reverend Neal Harvey, a world traveler, explorer, author, and theologian, who addresses the spiritual aspect of the UFO phenomenon. Reverend Harvey suggests that the accumulating evidence of flying saucers indicates they are real and likely originate from outer space. He advocates for accepting these realities and living with them, rather than dismissing them as freaks of nature or solely human creations. His comments aim to open a new channel for consideration regarding our world-situation.

Explanations for Sightings (Pages 1-4, 115-118)

Several sections of the magazine delve into the explanations for UFO sightings, drawing from the Air Force's findings and general observations:

• Aircraft: Untrained observers might mistake sunlight reflections from polished aircraft surfaces or the exhaust trails of jet aircraft for UFOs. New lighting systems on aircraft, with red and white flashing lights, are also cited as a cause of misidentification.
• Weather Balloons: Balloons sent to high altitudes (up to 40,000 feet) are a common source of sightings. They are made of reflective materials, can swell at altitude, and may carry lights, making them visible from great distances.
• Astronomical Objects: Meteors, which are visible for only a few seconds and move rapidly in one direction, and planets like Venus, which can appear to change color and move erratically due to atmospheric conditions, are often reported as UFOs.
• Reflections: The concept of reflections from objects, similar to a mirror reflecting light, is presented as an explanation for phenomena exhibiting erratic movements and speeds that cannot be attributed to known aircraft or celestial bodies. These reflections can be projected onto clouds and haze.
• Misconceptions about Photographs: The article notes that most UFO photographs are inconclusive. Still photographs are easily faked, and even those taken with specialized cameras (like the Videon cameras procured by the Air Force) have yielded only light spots with no discernible detail.
• Yardsticks for Investigation: The Air Force established general criteria for evaluating sightings, acknowledging that objects viewed from a distance appear round, which aligns with many UFO descriptions. This suggests that many reported objects are farther away than observers estimate.

A reporting form is included, requesting detailed information such as date, time, size, shape, composition, speed, altitude, direction, maneuver pattern, color, sound, length of observation, sky conditions, visibility, wind direction, and observer's remarks. This form is intended to help standardize reports and improve the accuracy of investigations.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme throughout the issue is the systematic investigation and demystification of UFO sightings by the U.S. Air Force. The magazine's stance appears to be one of presenting factual findings from official sources, while also acknowledging the public's fascination with the phenomenon and exploring broader implications, such as the spiritual aspect raised by Reverend Harvey. The editorial tone is objective, aiming to educate readers about the likely explanations for reported aerial phenomena and the scientific methods employed to investigate them. There is a clear emphasis on rational explanations and the lack of evidence for extraterrestrial origins, while also recognizing the ongoing advancements in aviation technology that might create new visual phenomena.

This issue of AMAZING STORIES, spanning pages 125-130, focuses on the theme "WE NEED NOT FEAR THE ALIENS." The central argument is that perceived threats, such as flying saucers, should not be met with fear but rather with renewed faith and a deeper understanding of love and spirituality. The content is primarily philosophical and spiritual, using the phenomenon of flying saucers as a springboard to discuss human nature, faith, and our place in the universe.

The Fear of Flying Saucers and the Need for Faith

The author begins by acknowledging the widespread fear surrounding flying saucers, noting that many people are frightened by these objects. However, the core message is that these objects are not harmful or hostile in their intent. The article emphasizes that God is love and created the universe with the desire for life to love itself, not be hostile. It suggests that humanity's own hostility and power-seeking have been the primary hindrances to progress, including the achievement of space travel.

The piece contrasts the fear of the unknown, exemplified by flying saucers, with the need for faith. It posits that if humanity had been more loving and less hostile, progress would have been far greater. The author critiques the focus on atomic power for defense and security, arguing that this has diverted talent from more peaceful and constructive pursuits, such as space exploration for the benefit of mankind.

Love, Security, and the Present Moment

A significant portion of the text delves into the human condition, highlighting a lack of love and faith as the root of many problems. The author contends that people often fail to recognize genuine love when offered, suspecting ulterior motives. This sin and defeat are attributed to a deep-seated inability to trust one another, leading to a sense of isolation, described as living in a "glass box." The article draws a parallel to Lot's wife, suggesting that dwelling on the past and fearing the unknown prevents individuals from living in the present moment.

The concept of "security" is examined critically, with the author arguing that the pursuit of material or external security leads to hostility and mistrust, ultimately being a false sense of safety. True security, it is argued, comes from faith – letting go of externals and finding internal security through experiencing life. This involves accepting each moment as it is, with its joys and pains, and ceasing to resist its source.

The Evolvement of Life and Cosmic Origins

The flying saucers are presented as potentially being another step in the "evolvement of life in the universe," which is described as God's manner of creation. The article touches upon humanity's cosmic origins, suggesting that we are composed of elements from the universe created by God. It questions the origins of these elements and the process by which life formed, emphasizing the miraculous nature of existence.

The text encourages readers to open themselves to this evolvement and not resist life, as resistance is destructive to growth. It suggests that hostility, stemming from resistance, leads to pain and a lack of joy. The author posits that humanity has spent much of its history acting against the "stream of life" due to ignorance and a misguided quest for security, leading to wars and the dissipation of inner selves.

Experiencing Life and Overcoming Fear

The issue advocates for experiencing life moment by moment, without the imposition of rigid, outdated rules. It highlights the unique nature of each moment and each individual, encouraging pleasure in these differences. Letting go of fears and material desires is presented as a path to freedom, though it initially creates anxiety. This anxiety, when faced, gradually lessens, leading to the birth of faith.

The article suggests that the Oriental philosopher's advice to "go to the center of the flame to escape the heat of suffering" means to open up to and experience suffering without resistance. By truly experiencing the moment, peace is found, and fear diminishes. This restored faith allows individuals to know themselves fully and to meet new experiences with strength and joy, fostering trust and love for each other and themselves.

Conclusion: Faith as the Ultimate Security

The concluding thoughts reiterate that true security lies in faith, not in external factors. The issue argues that we are never the same from moment to moment, and attempting to capture a moment as a static entity is futile. The flying saucers are framed as a potential gift, a means to turn back to God and seek faith once more. The author asserts that these beings cannot be a threat because God would not grant hostile life forms the power of space travel if their intent were destructive. The piece ends with a call to have faith, suggesting that the beings inside the saucers may be beyond wars, and humanity is projecting its own terrors onto them.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are faith, love, fear, spirituality, and the nature of reality. The editorial stance is one of spiritual optimism, encouraging readers to embrace a non-fearful, faith-based perspective on life and the unknown. It advocates for a shift from external security and hostility to internal security found through love, acceptance, and experiencing the present moment. The issue uses the phenomenon of flying saucers as a metaphor and catalyst for this spiritual awakening, promoting a message of peace and interconnectedness.