AESV - no 10

Magazine Overview

This is a special issue of the A.E.S.V. (Association d'Étude sur les Soucoupes Volantes) bulletin, numbered 10 and identified as 'SPECIAL'. The cover features a photograph of a man and the headline "Le hamster a-t-il été victime d'un OVNI?" (Did the hamster become a victim of a UFO?). The publication is quarterly and priced at 7 Francs.

Editorial

The editorial for issue No. 10 announces a program that was to include a preview of the book "Rencontres Rapprochées en France" (Close Encounters in France) and an investigation into the Maurice Masse case. However, due to the recent visit of M. Jean Migueres to Aix-en-Provence to promote his second book, the editorial content was changed at the last minute. The A.E.S.V. had been conducting an investigation into the Migueres case for two years, and this special issue aims to provide answers to those questions. The editorial expresses hope that other associations will request permission to reproduce their extensive investigation to put an end to 'this great illusion.' Readers are encouraged to send in critiques, suggestions, questions, and opinions. The next issue is promised to feature an exclusive interview with Michel Figuet, astronauts, the UN, and UFOs.

The editorial also references the book "RENCONTRES RAPPROCHÉES EN FRANCE" by Michel Figuet and Jean Louis Ruchon, published by Alain Lefeuvre. The A.E.S.V. is affiliated with the FFEPS (Fédération Française d'Étude des Phénomènes Spatiaux).

Avant Propos (Foreword)

The 'Avant Propos' addresses the readers, stating that before writing this investigation, a survey of opinion among friendly UFO associations revealed a profound divergence of views on 'contactees' in general, and specifically on the subject of this investigation. Some were for, others vehemently against, accusing the A.E.S.V. of misinvesting their research time. The authors note that few associations maintained objectivity. They hesitated to publish this investigation because many individuals had involved themselves, and to avoid controversy, certain parts were censored. The authors were surprised by the lack of information and interest from private associations, as an authentic account would be a major step for ufology, and a false one would have significant repercussions. The A.E.S.V. undertook this investigation because they prefer to do the work themselves. They justify their efforts by finding a logical basis for their inquiry.

L'Enquête (The Investigation)

This article aims to study a case that has divided ufologists for years into 'pro' and 'anti' camps, focusing on how such a case is constructed rather than the case itself. The case in question is that of Migueres. The investigation began after the A.E.S.V. realized that the only existing investigation into M. Migueres's case was his own. Given that his account and investigation could not be objective, the A.E.S.V. conducted its own inquiry, finding the case to be not serious.

The article notes that groups who verified Migueres's statements quickly realized the enormous implausibilities, forming the 'anti' camp. The 'pro' camp, largely the public and some associations, forgot that ufology requires investigation and verification, giving Migueres their trust and free publicity. The A.E.S.V. began to realize this when preparing a report on his book for a bibliographic conference in 1977. The book, despite being nearly 300 pages, is described as 'hollow,' with much of it dedicated to Migueres's accident and its consequences. The authors argue that this accident, while not in doubt, serves as a basis for fabricating the rest of the story.

Les Preuves (The Proofs)

The investigation begins by examining the 'proofs' presented. The book was published by Editions Promazur RG, directed by M. Alain Lefeuvre, who is described as a friend of Migueres. The cover design was handled by M. André Devesa, which is noted as significant. The article then delves into specific points of Migueres's account:

• Point 1: The article questions Migueres's possession of a rescuer's certificate and his driver's license, suggesting it's unusual for private ambulance drivers. It also notes that Migueres claims to have left Perpignan hospital at 18:40 for Rouen with a seriously ill patient, arriving near Paris at 01:00. A calculation based on this implies a cruising speed of 149 km/h for a 926 km journey, which the authors deem impossible given Migueres's stated stops, including one at 21:00 for at least half an hour due to the patient's death. The article also points out that the Perpignan-Montpellier highway was not yet in service in 1969.
• Point 2: The article discusses an incident where rescuers allegedly needed to find different oxygen bottles because their own were incompatible with Migueres's equipment. A lieutenant of firefighters reportedly stated that such equipment (flow meter) has always been standard throughout Europe. The authors seek reader input on this.
• Point 3: Migueres reportedly declared himself clinically dead four or five times. The article explains the medical definition of death and notes that Migueres's medical file lacks the necessary documentation to support these claims.
• Point 4: Documents signed by a pseudo-doctor are presented, with a graphologist noting a strong similarity to Migueres's own handwriting and personal correspondence. The graphological analysis suggests an unusual inclination of the writing and specific letter formations, potentially indicating falsification.

Graphological Study

The graphological study highlights significant differences in the writing style and signature of Migueres compared to other documents. The author suggests that the signature might have been 'shrunk' for reproduction and that the text on page 128, despite being reduced by half, appears normal, implying possible falsification. The author notes that with a nurse as a spouse, it would be easy to conceal the hospital or city of practice under the guise of medical secrecy. The author leaves further detailed graphological analysis to colleagues.

Expert Opinion on France Inter

Regarding an alleged public expertise on France Inter, the article states that according to Migueres's own account, it was a monologue followed by a few questions from an anonymous doctor who declared it a 'miracle.'

Telepathic Message and Extraterrestrial Contact

An affirmation on page 141 is described as troubling and contradictory: a message from extraterrestrials via telepathy, allegedly provoked by Migueres himself to prove the existence of his 'friends.' The authors find these claims difficult to verify due to the anonymity of the witnesses and consider them subjective information insufficient to authenticate the account.

"Tele-transport" Incident

The article recounts a 'tele-transport' incident involving Jimmy Guieu and Guy Tarade, who reportedly confirmed the event. However, the authors find this 'adventure' improbable for several reasons. Migueres claims to have found himself off the highway three times near Nimes, heading towards Marseille, without passing any toll booths, and ending up on an unknown departmental road. The article strongly refutes this, stating that there is no highway between Nimes and Marseille, only the N.113 and N.568. It suggests that Migueres might have taken a departmental road like the D.35, or that the driver missed a sign. To use the autoroute, one would have had to go to Orange, adding 120 km. The authors conclude that Migueres again failed to verify his facts.

Analysis of Migueres's Book

The article criticizes Migueres's book, stating that it 'rings hollow.' It suggests that the book is filled with details about the accident to create a semblance of authenticity, but the core narrative is fabricated. The authors believe that Migueres's story is a constructed scenario, where he plays the role of the protagonist.

Hypotheses on Migueres's Motivation

The authors explore reasons behind Migueres's story, suggesting that while the lure of gain might be a factor, pride and the need for attention also play a role. They note that since his 1969 accident, his story has been refined, possibly influenced by Coué's self-suggestion method. They believe Migueres may genuinely believe his own narrative.

The "Kristcha" Planet and Asteroid Discovery

The article connects Migueres's claims of extraterrestrial communication about a planet named 'Kristcha' to the discovery of an asteroid. Migueres allegedly learned of this planet through telepathy in early 1973, while the official announcement of an asteroid discovery (by Charles Kowal, who had previously discovered other celestial bodies) was made on December 26th of the same year, with information filtering into articles from April 1975. The authors suggest Migueres may have used this information to enhance his narrative, announcing it as an unknown fact at the time of his 'message.'

Photo Analysis

A photo of an ambulance on page 227, allegedly taken days after the accident, shows Migueres and an 'extraterrestrial friend' applying a 'pastille' to his neck. The authors find the image highly ambiguous, stating that even with intense concentration, it's difficult to discern anything resembling a human head.

Authenticity Certificates and Professional Background

Two authenticity certificates are presented, one signed by M. André Devesa, who also designed the book cover. Migueres's background as a train conductor for R.A.T.P. and a private detective in Perpignan is mentioned. The article notes that his detective work apparently left no trace, as suggested by letters in Annex 7.

Scientific Expertise and Hypnosis

The article mentions Migueres's claims of undergoing scientific expertise, which would be the subject of his second book. It criticizes the numerous anonymous certificates in his book and points out that hypnosis interrogations, which could have provided scientific evidence, were never conducted under strict scientific control. A failed attempt at such an interrogation is mentioned in Annex 5, yet Migueres used the invitation as proof of his engagement with 'science.'

Conclusion

The investigation concludes that the published proofs are only the visible part of an extensive inquiry that prompted reflection not only on the Migueres case but on contactees in general. The authors highlight the ease with which ufologists can 'dissect' an individual's life (referencing the film "Dossier 51") and the means available to construct elaborate hoaxes. They suggest that the motivation for inventing such stories might stem from a desire for gain, but also from pride and the need for attention. The article posits that Migueres's narrative has evolved since his 1969 accident, becoming more sophisticated and possibly leading him to believe his own story.

Further Analysis of Migueres's Claims

The article continues to dissect Migueres's claims, particularly concerning his alleged extraterrestrial "friends" who supposedly developed part of his brain, granting him increased intelligence. It questions why beings with 20 million years of advancement would need a computer, deeming it illogical. Furthermore, it suggests that telepathy, a claimed paranormal ability, is incompatible with the use of a computer.

Guy Tarade's Contact and UFO Sightings

Jean Migueres contacted Guy Tarade for a UFO flyover of Nice, as Tarade could communicate with ETs via a code. The date of this contact is vaguely placed between January 15th and 31st. The authors express surprise that Tarade did not report other UFO sightings during this period, given the high probability of seeing unidentified objects, especially on the coast. They refrain from judging Tarade's affirmations but question the reliability of the dates. They also note that Tarade might have been alone during the observation.

Migueres's Second Book and Physical Mutations

The article mentions that Migueres's second book details his alleged mutations. He claims to have been recognized as 80% disabled but is not handicapped. The authors note a sense of pride in his description of himself as handsome, strong, and intelligent. Physiological mutations are also mentioned, with Migueres described as having remarkable robustness.

Dr. M. Pages and Anti-Gravitation

Migueres claims to have met with Dr. M. Pages, known for his research on anti-gravity, to discuss plans for UFOs provided by his "friends." The A.E.S.V. contacted Dr. Pages, whose response left them perplexed. The article suggests that Pages might have been a victim of a setup, and due to his age and peaceful nature, he may not wish to pursue legal action for defamation.

Hypotheses on Dr. Pages's Response

Several hypotheses are presented regarding Dr. Pages's response:

1. Pages never had contact with Migueres, implying Migueres fabricated the interaction.
2. Pages was interested in details provided by Migueres but was inconvenienced by the book's publication. This is deemed unlikely given Pages's diplomatic nature.
3. Pages disavowed any relationship with Migueres to claim the discovery himself, a scenario attributed to a source named "GABRIEL."

The authors state that the mystery deepens.

Conclusion on Dr. Pages

The article concludes that, one way or another, Pages appears to have been a victim of a machination. He is described as elderly and peaceful, unlikely to sue for defamation.

Further Correspondence from Dr. Pages

At the time of writing, a second letter from Pages addressed to colleagues in the Swiss section is mentioned, leaving the interpretation to the readers.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical analysis of UFO contactee claims, the methodology of ufological investigation, and the potential for hoaxes and self-deception within the field. The editorial stance is one of rigorous skepticism, emphasizing the need for verifiable evidence and objective analysis. The A.E.S.V. positions itself as a fact-checker, aiming to debunk unsubstantiated claims and bring clarity to the often sensationalized world of UFO phenomena. The publication encourages reader participation and critical thinking, striving to maintain a scientific approach to the study of flying saucers.

Title: Les Cahiers de l'Extraordinaire
Issue: 19
Volume: 1
Date: August 12, 1977 (Cover Date)
Publisher: Observatoire des Parasciences
Country: France
Language: French

This issue of "Les Cahiers de l'Extraordinaire" delves into a variety of unusual and unexplained phenomena, featuring medical cases, alleged extraterrestrial encounters, and astronomical observations.

Featured Articles and Sections

"Espoir après un an de coma" (Hope After a Year in a Coma)

This article details the remarkable survival of Kévin Clifft from Boone-Grove, Indiana. After a severe car accident a year prior, Clifft was given only 24 hours to live due to extensive injuries, including kidney damage, broken ribs, and brain lesions. Despite remaining in a coma for a full year, his parents maintained hope. The article describes his critical condition, including hepatic failure, and the medical interventions, such as draining bile and inserting a feeding tube. It highlights his gradual recovery, including regaining strength, learning to stand, and eventually walking again, attributing his progress to the care of doctors Allen and Fulton, and nurses like Dolores Reeser.

"L'HOMME QUI FUT VIDÉ DE SON SANG" (The Man Who Was Drained of His Blood)

This section recounts the experience of Sergeant Tor Olsen from McConnell Air Force Base in Wichita, Kansas. In February 1972, Olsen noticed swelling in his joints, which initially seemed minor but quickly worsened, affecting his ankles, wrists, shoulders, and back. He had difficulty bending and walked with pain. Hospitalized, he was diagnosed with viral hepatitis and underwent treatment, including rest.

Correspondence and Investigations

Several letters and reports shed light on the controversial figure of Jean Miguères.

• Letter from Guy Tarade to Coste Robert (August 12, 1977): Tarade discusses his book "Chronique des Mondes Parallèles" and his investigation into Jean Miguères. He admits to initially being skeptical of Miguères, labeling him as one of the "illuminated" individuals common in the field. However, Tarade states that Miguères proved his claims by causing a UFO to fly over Nice on a date set by Tarade. He also validates Miguères' "epic adventure on the highway," asserting that as a former paratrooper commando, he has his feet on the ground. Tarade believes Miguères is a significant figure in the quest for the "Impossible" and that within a year, information will emerge to prove that the entities involved are not human and are linked to a temporal evolution of our world. He suggests a meeting to discuss further.

• Letter from Dr. M. J. J. Pages to Cher Monsieur (Perpignan, January 23, 1979): Dr. Pages apologizes for his delayed response due to a stay in a clinic. He directly refutes Miguères' claims about their supposed conversations and services rendered, stating that "nothing is true" regarding their interactions. Pages believes Miguères owes more to the doctors who treated him than to any supposed extraterrestrials and is ignorant of the presumed functioning of UFOs.

• Letter from A.E.S.V. to Mr. Perry (Aix-en-Provence, March 28, 1978): This letter addresses a request for information and clarifies that the Cabinet DAN was created on January 1, 1975, suggesting an error in the name or address provided.

• Letter from A.E.S.V. to Monsieur le secrétaire (Perpignan, February 20, 1978): Detective Pupet states that he has never employed M. Migueres in his cabinet.

• Letter from Guy Tarade to Monsieur Serge Leuba (Nice, March 21, 1978): Tarade confirms the authenticity of a letter published by Jean Miguères, stating that the facts align with the truth. He categorizes Miguères as an "element included in the UFO problem." Tarade suggests that humanity is currently under "mind-control," referencing the film "Close Encounters of the Third Kind." He notes that Miguères' case is of medical interest due to his claims of having died three times. Tarade mentions encountering individuals with even more dramatic adventures, including one who spent over two hours with beings from another world, a case largely unknown to ufologists.

• Report on Jean Miguères' Conference in Aix (March 21, 1979): This report details a conference given by Jean Miguères in Aix, attended by approximately 500 people, including Michel Figuet and Jimmy Guieu, and members of A.E.S.V. Aix. During the conference, Miguères asserted that disruptive individuals, allegedly sent by police or CNRS, often manifested. The report describes the debate as "rude," with Miguères labeling some attendees as "troublions de service." The audience split into two camps. The report concludes that the event was a success for A.E.S.V., which opened its files and received apologies and expressions of sympathy from the public.

Astronomical Information

• Letter from Charles T. Kowal (California Institute of Technology) to Mr. Perry (January 25, 1978): Kowal provides requested information on asteroids and the planetoid 'Chiron'. He corrects the orbit of asteroid 1975 YA, stating it travels between Earth and Mars, not between Venus and Earth as previously reported. Asteroids 1976 UA and 1977 HB are noted to cross the orbit of Venus.

• Letter from Charles T. Kowal to Cher M. Perry (Undated): Kowal reiterates the information about the asteroid 1975 YA's orbit and mentions that asteroids 1976 UA and 1977 HB cross Venus's orbit.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine appears to focus on unexplained phenomena, particularly UFOs and alleged alien contact, often presenting cases that challenge conventional scientific or medical explanations. There is a clear division in the reporting and correspondence regarding the credibility of certain individuals, such as Jean Miguères. While some, like Guy Tarade, express a degree of belief or at least fascination, others, including medical professionals and private investigators, are highly skeptical, viewing such claims as fabrications or psychological issues. The magazine also touches upon broader themes like "mind-control" and the potential for advanced, non-human intelligence influencing human affairs. The editorial stance seems to be one of open inquiry into these subjects, presenting various viewpoints and evidence, even when contradictory.