Abduction Watch - No 08-9 1998

Magazine Overview

This issue of *Abduction Watch*, dated March/April 1998, is a combined double issue (No. 8/9) that apologizes for the delay in production. The editor explains that the delay allowed for the compilation of extensive coverage on the Jason Andrews case, including press coverage, a book review, and a related OVNI article. The issue also includes material on 'Nazi UFO' from Martin Kottmeyer.

Tony Dodd and Jason Andrews - Chosen by Aliens?

The central article focuses on the 4-day serialisation of the Jason Andrews story in The SUN. The author expresses concern about the book 'Abducted - The True Story of Alien Abduction in Rural England', published by Headline, suggesting it promotes abduction belief to a cult-like degree and advising against ordering it from libraries. The author provides their immediate view, emphasizing public interest and child protection, while aiming for accurate reporting.

The article delves into Tony Dodd's perception of his relationship with aliens and abductions, noting how some in ufology view him as a powerful figure. It quotes a letter from Dodd to Omar Fowler, published in OVNI magazine, where Dodd expresses certainty about terrestrial origins for some flying triangles and extraterrestrial origins for others seen in Scotland and the Arctic. Dodd claims there is liaison between humans and a benevolent ET race, and also a malevolent ET race. He believes advanced technology is being provided by the friendly ETs to defend against the unfriendly, citing new triangular aircraft and advanced particle beam weapons. Dodd also links this to the appearance of huge underground facilities and animal/human mutilations.

Dodd's position is further clarified by his belief that abductions should be viewed as the start of a spiritual journey. He claims to 'receive' messages from alien intelligences, which have provided spiritual comfort to many, including hospice patients. The author finds this reference to hospice patients particularly astonishing, suggesting Dodd's messages offer assurance of continued existence beyond death.

The article then discusses Jason Andrews' early contact with Dodd. Jason, around 11 or 12, was approached by Dodd after his parents, convinced by a TV program, sought an explanation for his behavioral problems. Dodd admitted to Jason that he himself was still scared by his own abductions. The author questions the claims made about Jason's expulsion from school, hospitalizations, mysterious marks, and the involvement of social services and MAFF, noting significant discrepancies between Dodd's account in UFO Magazine (1996) and the later book (1998).

It is suggested that the family chose the abduction explanation for their son's disturbed behavior, immersing themselves in UFO culture and seeking out investigators like Tony Dodd. Memories of abductions reportedly surfaced without hypnotic regression. The author criticizes the book for promoting abduction as a generational phenomenon and for the mother's belief that her miscarriage was due to alien intervention or a hybrid foetus. The elder son also recounts alien encounters. Jason has been encouraged to meet other abductees.

The family's experiences fit Dodd's template for abductees, particularly regarding animal mutilation. The author expresses concern that Jean Ritchie, the co-author, seems unfamiliar with cult development and the manipulation of vulnerable children. A specific incident where Jason went missing and an abductee advised against informing the police is highlighted, with the author deeming this advice unacceptable.

The article questions why Dodd does not report animal mutilations or injured children to the police or RSPCA, speculating it's because he believes he cannot stop the phenomena and that governments are involved in cover-ups. Dodd's sincerity is not doubted, but his role in bringing the case to public attention is emphasized. The author expresses concern about the book's dangerous legacy and calls for open debate.

A quote from the book describes Jason's despair and contemplation of suicide, which the author finds deeply concerning, equating it to encouraging a child towards death. The author calls for a national view on whether children should be 'counselled' by those who claim to be abducted.

The author advocates for investigating inconsistencies in evidence, noting the advantage of having two separate accounts of the Jason Andrews case. The article concludes by stating that the situation is unprecedented and calls for efforts to prevent similar occurrences.

Yesterday Belongs to Me

This section reviews an article from *Alien Encounters* (April 1998) titled 'Roswell Explained' by Zbigniew Blania-Bolnar. The article proposes that the Roswell UFO crash was a Nazi-developed 'kugelblitz' manned by a monkey. The source is allegedly an 'American military man of Polish descent called Robert Allan Kolitzky'. The article describes a craft with a 27-meter diameter and a central part of 8 meters, claiming it was a German craft brought over after WWII. The author notes that 'kugelblitz' does not resemble a flying disc and questions the source's credibility.

Blania-Bolnar is said to have written a book about the 'Laredo Incident' and a related event in 'Emilcinie', Poland. The author suspects this is neo-Nazi propaganda, questioning the existence of the cited military man and the accuracy of the piece. The author also discusses Rudolf Lusar's book 'German Secret Weapons of the Second World War', published in 1959, which is presented as a key work in the 'Nazi UFO' mythos. Lusar, a retired Major, claims extensive knowledge of secret Nazi technology.

Martin Kottmeyer provides material on 'Nazi UFO' claims, including a 1957 newscutting from the *New Britain Herald* quoting James H Doolittle and Hugh L Dryden, who dismissed claims of Nazi Germany developing advanced flying saucers and bombers as untrue and an advertisement for Lusar's book.

Lusar's book describes 'flying saucers' with advanced aerodynamic capabilities, including a disc-shaped plane developed by Miethe and test-flown by Schriever and Habermohl on February 14, 1945, reaching 12,400m and 2,000 km/h. The author dismisses these claims as fabrication, citing the implausibility of the speeds and altitudes. Lusar also claims German research produced cameras capable of taking millions of photographs per second, which the author also debunks as technically incompetent and likely false.

The author concludes that Lusar was an unreconstructed Nazi promoting disinformation. The article suggests that claims of Nazi flying saucers are lies designed to make Nazis appear more competent. The author proposes that unless a credible account of the February 1945 test-flight emerges, the 'flying saucer' account should be considered fiction, possibly based on dubious accounts from Schriever and elaborated by 'Renate Vesco'. The author calls for a responsible account that avoids ludicrous claims and provides mechanical details, ideally not from a source linked to the Nazi regime.

Alison's Balloon

This section discusses a case involving 'Alison' and a 'missing time' incident. Initially, there was no suggestion of missing time. An objective video evidence suggests a mundane terrestrial object containing a gas lighter than air. The author notes that the General Medical Council's guide 'Good medical practice' advises doctors against abusing patient trust or subjecting them to unnecessary investigations. The author suspects the GP who regressed Alison used hypnotic regression before it was medically and legally discredited, and that the regression was not in Alison's best interests, given her fear and belief of being taken into a 'black hole'. The author intends to seek assurance from the GP and make a submission to the GMC regarding the use of regression hypnosis in investigating alien abductions.

Alien B*ll*cks

This section addresses claims from Puerto Rico, centered around Jorge Martin, who edits a UFO magazine. Martin's authority is questioned due to his stories being second or third-hand, sometimes undated, and lacking critical investigation. The author suggests he is recounting urban legends. The section reviews Tim Good's book 'Alien Base', which focuses on Puerto Rico as a potential location for an 'alien base'.

The article details the story of 'Chino' who allegedly met and killed a 12"-14" tall alien in Puerto Rico in 1979 or 1980. Polaroid photographs of the alleged creature are mentioned, but their authenticity and whether they depict a real creature or a hoax are questioned. Tim Good published one such photograph, describing the creature's proportions: head and neck 30%, torso 27%, legs 43%.

The author notes that translations of Martin's account attempt to prove the creature is not a foetus by suggesting sexual maturity, a theory the author dismisses. The author points out that foetuses do not have large plastic heads, and their cranial bones are soft, unlike the dented skull of the alleged victim.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical examination of abduction claims, particularly the Jason Andrews case, and the debunking of 'Nazi UFO' theories. The magazine adopts a skeptical and investigative stance, prioritizing evidence, logical consistency, and child protection. There is a strong emphasis on identifying and exposing misinformation, propaganda, and potentially harmful beliefs, especially those that exploit vulnerable individuals or promote unsubstantiated claims. The editorial stance is one of rigorous inquiry, challenging established narratives within the UFO community when evidence is lacking or contradictory. The issue also highlights concerns about the misuse of psychological techniques like hypnotic regression and the potential for cult-like behavior within certain belief systems.

This issue of UFO Magazine delves into several controversial topics within the UFO and paranormal community. It features critical examinations of claims made by various individuals and organizations, questioning the evidence and motivations behind them.

Critiques of Abduction Claims and Sources

The issue begins by scrutinizing a description of alien genitalia, comparing it to illustrations and questioning the reliability of sources such as Jorge Martin. The text highlights an apparent inconsistency between a detailed description of overwhelming male genitalia and the depiction in the 'Alien Base' illustration, suggesting a need for serious re-evaluation of Martin's writings.

UFO Magazine Editor and 'Quest International'

A section titled 'UFO Magazine Editor an abductee?' raises questions about Graham Birdsall, the founder of 'Quest International'. The article notes that Birdsall established the organization to help people with their abduction experiences, implying that he himself has had such experiences. The magazine questions what is known about these experiences and whether they are credible.

Tim Rifat, Remote Viewing, and Secret Wars

The article 'M15, Tim Rifat, and the alien secret' focuses on Tim Rifat, who claims to be able to perform 'remote viewing'. The piece mentions his upcoming book and his assertions that American and Russian forces are engaged in a secret war, shooting down alien craft. Rifat also claims that aliens can manipulate human memories, paralyze individuals, and psychically possess them. He further alleges that MI5 has attempted to silence him due to fears that public disclosure of remote viewing would reveal the truth about aliens. The author expresses skepticism about Rifat's claims, asking if he has ever provided convincing evidence for his remote viewing abilities.

'Honed' Memories and Abduction Beliefs

Ernie Sears is featured in a section discussing 'Honed' Memories, responding to AWB's views on physical abductions. Sears reportedly dislikes the idea that physical abductions have occurred and summarizes the 'cult-like' attitude of abduction believers. He asserts that he has been able to pierce 'screen memories' covering experiences from up to 60 years ago. His own memories, such as a scar on his wrist or seeing fish tanks, have been reinterpreted as 'incubariums' for 'hybrid' foetuses or similar abduction incidents, a process he describes as 'honing' his memories since the 1930s when UFOs and abductions were less known.

Professor Freemont and Quest International's Evidence

Professor Freemont provides a reply that confirms that despite claims of evidence of mutilations, including those connected with Jason Andrews, 'Quest International' has provided him with no physical evidence. He states that he is willing to examine any alleged victim of mutilation but has only received a splinter of rotting wood and no animal tissue. He emphasizes that he would be delighted to examine such tissue if it became available through proper channels.

Subscription Information and Enquiries

The magazine includes subscription details, offering 12 issues for £10 in the UK, with various rates for international subscribers. It also poses two significant enquiries:

1. It asks for reasons why unfavorable comments from a respected psychologist regarding a regression conducted on a prominent UK 'abductee' in 1983 should not receive wider publicity.
2. It addresses rumors that Nick Pope may have considered himself abducted before publishing his first book. The article notes that the MOD provided 'Quest International's' phone number as a contact point for UFO inquiries, alongside BUFORA's. It suggests that individuals with rational inquiries might have been assured of abduction realities and recommended regression by Quest. The enquiry questions the implications for the MOD if Pope was already convinced of abduction during his tenure and if any public member emerged as an 'abductee' through this process, stating that no government employee should be responsible for such a situation.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around skepticism towards extraordinary claims within the UFO community, particularly concerning abductions and psychic abilities. The magazine adopts a critical stance, urging readers to question the evidence presented by individuals and organizations, and highlighting potential inconsistencies and lack of verifiable proof. There is a strong emphasis on the need for rigorous investigation and transparency, especially concerning government involvement and the handling of public inquiries related to UFO phenomena.