AI Magazine Summary
Cuadernos de Ufologia - 3a Epoca - No 24
AI-Generated Summary
This issue of "Cuadernos de Ufología" (UFO Notebooks), published by Fundación Anomalía, is the 24th issue of its 3rd epoch, dated 1998. The cover highlights several key features: a report on Professor Erling Strand and the Hessdalen Project, which won an international award; a…
Magazine Overview
This issue of "Cuadernos de Ufología" (UFO Notebooks), published by Fundación Anomalía, is the 24th issue of its 3rd epoch, dated 1998. The cover highlights several key features: a report on Professor Erling Strand and the Hessdalen Project, which won an international award; a "Dossier Ozmanía" on the legends of the 'Land of Oz' (part 1); and the announcement of Fundación Anomalía's annual awards. The publication details are provided as "Nº 24 (act. 3) - 3ª Epoca 1998" from Fundación Anomalía, with an ISSN of 1136-3002.
Editorial
The editorial, titled "¡Oh, la Fundación!", reflects on the twelve months of Fundación Anomalía's existence, considering its survival a near miracle given the challenges. It highlights the creation of awards and support for research into unidentified aerial phenomena. The editorial mentions the publication of the "Diccionario Temático de Ufología" (Thematic Dictionary of Ufology) and the continued publication of the magazine. It notes that despite efforts towards openness and honest motives, the Foundation still faces incomprehension, criticism, and silence. The editorial also touches upon significant events impacting UFO research, such as the Rockefeller-sponsored colloquium by the Society for Scientific Exploration, which aimed to critically analyze methods, data, and evidence related to UFO reports. The editorial concludes by emphasizing the importance of work, reflection, and deepening understanding in the field.
Articles and Features
Punto Final a la Desclasificación OVNI (Final Point on UFO Declassification) by V.J. Ballester Olmos:
This article discusses the progress of the declassification of UFO archives by the Spanish Air Force. The author clarifies that the 'official declassification' refers to the release of the last remaining historical UFO files held by the Air Force, making them public domain. He addresses criticisms and claims that the declassification had ended prematurely, explaining that while the main archives were transferred to the MOA (Mando Aéreo de Combate), additional documents continued to be released. The article details new expeditions declassified in July and September 1997, including reports from 1978 and 1979, supplementary cases, radar detections from Gando and Gran Canaria, and cases from the Air Force's OVNI correspondence archive. Ballester Olmos proposes that the lists of these files, which are confidential for ten years, should also be declassified to allow researchers to verify the completeness of the process. He states that the MOA has added 21 new files since taking over management, contributing information on 35 additional sightings between 1965 and 1995. The article includes a table summarizing the declassification process, showing 83 declassified files and 122 distinct UFO observations between 1962 and 1995.
Balance del Proceso de Desclasificación:
This section summarizes the declassification efforts, noting that 83 files have been released, comprising 1,935 pages of official documents detailing 122 UFO observations from 1962 to 1995. The MOA expanded the archives transferred in 1992 by adding 21 new expeditions, which included information on 35 more sightings.
Tabla IV: Tipos según Clasificación Dr. Hynek:
This table categorizes UFO sightings based on Dr. Hynek's classification (LUCES NOCTURNAS, RADAR-VISUAL, TRAZA RADAR, ENCUENTROS CERCANOS) with associated dates and estimated 'peso' (weight/significance) such as 'medio' (medium), 'alto' (high), and 'bajo' (low).
Se Oculta Información al Público (Information is Hidden from the Public):
This section refutes claims that the Air Force deliberately conceals UFO information. The author asserts that nothing known is hidden and that what is unknown cannot be declassified. He acknowledges that other reports may exist but are lost or their whereabouts are unknown. He criticizes certain ufologists for allegedly withholding information themselves.
- A Cincuenta Años de los "Platos Voladores" (Fifty Years of "Flying Saucers"):
- This is the second part of a series focusing on the social repercussions of UFO sightings in Argentina and South America in 1947. It details events in Chile, including:
- II. Los Platos Voladores en Chile (The Flying Saucers in Chile) by Dr. Roberto Banchs: This section recounts early UFO sightings in Chile following Kenneth Arnold's famous sighting. On July 7, 1947, three unusual 'moon-shaped' objects were seen flying in Algarrobo. The article mentions sightings of large, fast-moving discs with clock-hand-like mechanisms and luminous trails. It also describes a luminous object observed near Osorno and Puyehue, which moved with abrupt changes in altitude. The Embassy of Great Britain requested photographs of these 'meteors' from the Salto Observatory. The article notes that by mid-July, news of sightings had increased significantly, with reports in newspapers like El Mercurio. On July 14th, a large luminous disc was seen near Temuco and Maquehua. On July 17th, two large luminous discs were observed over Valparaíso, and a circular object was seen in the bay. The article includes a photograph of a Convair B-36 aircraft, suggesting it might be mistaken for a UFO.
Un Inventor de Discos Voladores (An Inventor of Flying Saucers):
This section discusses H.S. Wshlin (or Ashlin), an English aviator from WWI residing in Valparaíso, who claimed to have invented 'flying saucers' in 1940. His offer to the British military was rejected, leading him to present his plans to the Chilean military. The article also mentions the mysterious disappearance of the "Lancastrian Star Dust" aircraft on August 2, 1947, after it reported seeing something unusual and uttering the word "STENDEK".
III. Los Discos Voladores en Brasil (The Flying Saucers in Brazil):
This section reports on early UFO sightings in Brazil in 1947. It mentions reports from Presidente Bernardes, São Paulo, where objects described as 'half-moon' shaped and aluminum-colored were seen moving at high speed and altitude. Another report describes a 'white saucer-shaped' disc seen at high altitude. The article also details an incident on July 23rd where a topographer allegedly encountered three beings from a landed saucer in Paraná. The beings were described as having large, bald heads, round eyes, and carrying metallic boxes on their backs, reminiscent of the Villas Boas case.
Efectos Psicológicos (Psychological Effects):
This section explores the psychological impact of UFO phenomena. It references experts who suggest that some UFO reports might be symptoms of 'pathological receptivity' or mass hysteria. Dr. Edward Strecker, director of a mental health hospital, believes that the 'flying saucer' phenomenon could lead to significant psychological distress in the event of an attack, potentially more damaging than the physical impact of weapons.
Libros (Books):
This section lists books related to ufology, including "Expedientes Insólitos" and "Cuadernos de Ufología".
Fundación Anomalía otorga sus premios anuales (Fundación Anomalía Awards its Annual Prizes):
This article details the awards given by Fundación Anomalía, recognizing contributions to UFO research. Pedro Redón Trabal of the Centro de Estudios Interplanetarios received an award, as acknowledged by a certificate signed by Julio Arcas Gilardi.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue are the declassification of official UFO documents, historical UFO sightings from the mid-20th century (particularly 1947), and the psychological aspects of the UFO phenomenon. The editorial stance, as expressed in the editorial and the article on declassification, is one of transparency and a commitment to advancing UFO research through open access to information. The magazine actively debunks claims of government cover-ups regarding UFOs, advocating for critical analysis and objective investigation. There is a clear emphasis on historical research and the dissemination of factual information within the ufological community.
This issue of CdU magazine, identified as issue 32, delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena, with a particular focus on historical cases and official investigations. The content spans reports from South America, Switzerland, and Spain, covering incidents from the 1940s to the mid-1990s.
The 'Stardust' Aircraft Disappearance
The issue begins by revisiting the mysterious disappearance of the "Stardust" aircraft, which vanished in Chile just minutes before landing. The article highlights that astronomers had reported UFO sightings in the area prior to the incident and mentions the aircraft was an Avro 691 Lancastrian, a modified bomber used for civilian transport. It also notes that several of these aircraft had crashed or disappeared. The text questions the official versions of the event, suggesting that the aircraft might have crashed due to severe weather conditions in the Andes. It also addresses the term "STENDEK," suggesting it might be a misinterpretation of the English phrase "stand by."
South American UFO Sightings (1940s)
The magazine then shifts to a broader analysis of UFO sightings in South America, particularly in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, during the post-World War II era. It notes the context of the time, situated between the V-2 rockets and the first satellite launches, and the atomic and thermonuclear bomb developments. The press played a significant role in disseminating information about these sightings, often shaping public perception. The article categorizes potential explanations for these phenomena into: ordinary physical phenomena, psychological contagion, advanced foreign technology, or extraterrestrial origins. It highlights that in Argentina, the topic was treated with more humor and less fear than in other regions, often linked to everyday life and poverty.
The El Hierro, Spain, Mass Sighting (1995)
A significant portion of the magazine is dedicated to a mass UFO sighting that occurred on the island of El Hierro, Spain, on August 12-13, 1995. The event involved over 2,000 witnesses and was initially described as a large, luminous object. However, the investigation revealed that the phenomenon was a well-executed prank involving a balloon with lights, designed to deceive observers. The article details the investigation, including witness testimonies and analysis of a film, concluding that the perceived size and altitude were due to a lack of references and misinterpretation.
Official UFO Investigations in Switzerland
The magazine presents a report on official UFO investigations in Switzerland. It states that the Swiss military (DMF) has shown interest in UFO phenomena but has not conducted systematic investigations, deeming them not to be a military threat. The article details a press release from the DMF in 1995, which denied possessing secret information on UFOs and stated that official documents are archived and accessible to researchers. It notes that the Swiss Air Force's documentation center (CADCA) compiled a dossier of 18 UFO observations between 1971 and 1987, with most reports coming from civilian testimonies.
Analysis of Swiss UFO Data
Further analysis of the Swiss UFO data reveals that civilian testimonies accounted for the majority of reports (55.5%), followed by military pilots (22.2%). The article mentions a specific case from 1971 involving a radar detection of a UFO moving at extremely high speed over Geneva. It also notes that the official data does not provide explanations for the nature of these observations.
Abductions and Implants
The issue concludes with a section on "Abductions - Contemporary Legends from the Land of 'Oz'," which begins a series on the topic. It introduces the problem of alien abductions and the role of implants, referencing early cases and the work of Dr. Leir and his group F.I.R.S.T. in performing "implantectomies." The article also touches upon the potential influence of film and hypnosis on abduction accounts and the dangers associated with hypnotic regression techniques.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue include the analysis of historical UFO cases, the role of official investigations (and potential cover-ups), the psychological and social context of UFO sightings, and the ongoing debate about alien abductions. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, seeking to provide a balanced perspective by examining witness testimonies, official reports, and potential explanations, while also acknowledging the enduring mystery and fascination surrounding the UFO phenomenon. The magazine aims to inform readers by compiling and analyzing available data, encouraging further critical study.
This issue of Dossier "Ozmania", identified as issue number 41, focuses on the phenomenon of alien abductions under the headline "ABDUCCIONES QUE NUNCA DESPEGAN" (Abductions That Never Take Off), authored by Hilary Evans. The magazine explores the idea that alien invasions, once confined to science fiction, are now a reality, with extraterrestrials frequently visiting Earth and conducting operations on humans.
The Reality of Abductions
Hilary Evans posits that abductions are a crucial event in human history, marking a transition from humanity's perceived solitude in the cosmos to an era of interaction with other civilizations. He cites figures like psychologist Leo Sprinkle, who views it as a learning process for humanity, and information scientist Jacques Vallée, who suggests it's part of a cosmic control system. The article emphasizes the importance of taking these claims seriously.
Tens of Thousands of Cases
Twenty years prior, personal encounters with extraterrestrials were rare, but today, thousands claim to have been abducted. Investigator Budd Hopkins has researched 1500 cases, and this number is likely higher due to unreported incidents. A 1992 Roper survey estimated 3.7 million abductions in the United States alone, suggesting a global figure of 16 to 200 million people. This statistic is used by abduction proponents to argue against the possibility of widespread lying or hallucination among abductees, who generally believe their experiences were physically real.
The primary sources for this phenomenon are the firsthand accounts of witnesses, while secondary sources include the work of investigators like Hopkins, Jacobs, and Mack, as well as catalogs like Bullard's. Commentary also comes from conferences, such as one held at MIT in 1992. Skeptics like John Rimmer and Philip Klass, believers like Edith Fiore, and observers like Jenny Randles have all contributed their perspectives.
The Problem of Abductions
Some authors argue that abductions should not be viewed in isolation but within a broader context, often spiritual or New Age, which reframes the issue as one of support for abductees rather than skepticism. The typical abduction experience, as defined by Rodeghier et al., involves being taken against one's will to an unknown location, often a spaceship, where examination or communication with non-human beings occurs. The article notes the increasing prominence of forced impregnation and fetal extraction as part of these experiences.
The central dilemma lies in reconciling the seemingly honest and sincere testimonies of abductees with the inherent contradictions, inconsistencies, and impossibilities within their accounts. While the remarkable similarity across numerous reports is cited as evidence of their reality, the article points out that similar patterns exist in other phenomena like near-death experiences or Marian apparitions, which are not generally accepted as direct physical experiences.
A third school of thought, prevalent among Americans, suggests that the reality of these experiences is less important than the fact that the individual is a victim needing help. However, the article questions the type of help needed, drawing an analogy to rape victims: help differs depending on whether the event was real or imagined. Therefore, determining the reality of abductions is crucial.
Proving Abductions Are Real
If abductions were real, proving them should be straightforward, perhaps through photographic evidence, independent witnesses, or alien souvenirs. However, such concrete evidence is lacking. The article highlights the case of Travis Walton, whose abduction was dramatized in the film "Fire in the Sky," as an example where, if the witnesses are truthful, an alternative reality must be considered. Similarly, Linda Napolitano's case is presented as a physical impossibility to explain within conventional reality.
Abduction researchers like David Jacobs maintain that abductions are real, present-day experiences. He attempts to explain seemingly impossible details, such as people passing through solid objects, by suggesting that the mechanism might also render them invisible. However, the article argues that solving one mystery by invoking another is not a resolution.
The Role of Suggestion and Psychology
The article explores how simple suggestions, particularly through hypnosis, can induce altered states of consciousness and lead individuals to believe they have been abducted. The case of Betty Hill is recounted, where a volunteer under hypnosis fabricated an abduction story that later seemed to explain her behavioral changes. This suggests that hypnosis can transform real experiences into abduction narratives.
Furthermore, psychological factors such as bipolar disorder or stress can trigger experiences that appear to be abductions. The case of a bipolar patient who hallucinated aliens when her lithium levels were low is presented. The article emphasizes that while the experience might be real to the individual, its cause can be physiological or psychological rather than external alien intervention.
The Influence of Culture and Fantasy
Experiments by Alwin Lawson and Dr. McCall in 1977 demonstrated that volunteers with no prior knowledge of UFOs could, under hypnosis, create detailed and remarkably similar abduction stories. This suggests that the content of abduction narratives might be influenced by cultural expectations and pre-existing fantasies rather than objective events.
The difference in findings between researchers like Jenny Randles (British) and American researchers is attributed to cultural exposure. While American culture has been more exposed to abduction narratives, British culture, at the time, was less so, suggesting that abduction experiences might be culturally conditioned subjective phenomena rather than objective encounters.
Confusing the Experts
The article illustrates the difficulty in distinguishing between real and imagined abductions through the case of John Mack, a Harvard professor. Donna Basset presented Mack with an elaborate, fabricated abduction story, which Mack, despite its improbability, accepted and integrated into his research. This highlights how even distinguished researchers can be deceived by false evidence.
Another case involves Christi Dennis, who confessed that her detailed alien encounter narrative was pure science fiction. Leo Sprinkle, a researcher who studied her, noted that her behavior exhibited characteristics similar to those of "contactees" he had studied, suggesting a blurring of lines between genuine and fabricated experiences.
From Fantasy to Hallucination
The article discusses how fantasies can arise from various circumstances, and when combined with the cultural prevalence of alien encounters, can contribute to abduction narratives. It also touches upon the association between fantasy and hallucination, with psychologists often viewing hallucinations as indicative of mental illness.
However, the article notes that in Europe and Australia, there's a more flexible approach, acknowledging that healthy individuals can hallucinate under specific stimuli. The case of Gad Quintero is presented as an example where a severe storm might have triggered an altered state of consciousness, leading to what appeared to be an abduction, but was more likely a psychological response to external conditions.
The concept of "propensity to fantasy" is introduced, suggesting that some individuals are more prone to fantasizing than others, to the point of blurring the lines with reality. While some cases might involve genuine mental illness, the article posits that many experiences, including those involving perceived alien encounters, can be triggered by stress, loss, or other life crises, leading to altered states of consciousness and potential hallucinations.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the nature of abduction experiences: their potential reality versus their psychological or imaginative origins. The article leans towards a skeptical yet open-minded stance, emphasizing the lack of concrete evidence for physical abductions while acknowledging the profound impact these experiences, real or imagined, have on individuals. It highlights the role of cultural conditioning, psychological states, and the power of suggestion, particularly through hypnosis, in shaping these narratives. The editorial stance suggests that while the phenomenon is complex and often difficult to verify, understanding the psychological and social factors involved is crucial for interpreting abduction claims. The article concludes that many reported abductions may be a manifestation of internal psychological states rather than external alien encounters.
This issue of "The Real News" (Volume 1, nº 6, July 1993) delves into the complex world of ufology, focusing on the analysis of alleged alien implants and the psychological underpinnings of abduction experiences. The magazine features articles that blend scientific investigation with critical examination of paranormal claims, exploring the origins and potential explanations for phenomena reported by abductees.
The "Implant" Case of James Basil
The article "ANALIZANDO UN IMPLANTE 'ALIENÍGENA'" by Susan Blackmore and David T. Patton details the scientific investigation of an object claimed by abductee James Basil to be an alien implant. Basil reported experiencing a terrifying abduction at age thirteen, which led to memories of other encounters. He believed he had proof of his experiences because aliens had implanted a small object in his mouth, which he had subsequently removed. The object, described as about 2x3 mm and dullish gray, was examined using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis. The conclusion was that the 'implant' was a displaced dental filling coated with dried organic material. The researchers noted that while the object was irregular, it did not appear to be miniaturized alien technology. They also found a possible fiber, which could have been on the surface and separated during mounting. The elemental analysis, detailed in Table I, showed a composition of mercury, silver, and tin, consistent with dental amalgam, with a small percentage of other elements like calcium, chlorine, and silicon.
The Origin of the Nasal Implant Narrative
Martin Kottemeyer's article, "LA AMENAZA DEL ALIENÍGENA 'MOQUEADOR'", critically examines the phenomenon of alleged alien implants, particularly those inserted through the nose. Kottemeyer questions the origin of such claims, suggesting they are not likely originating from ufologists themselves but rather from the abductees. He discusses potential explanations, including mental control, tracking devices, or even symbolic rituals. However, he highlights the potential danger of such implants, especially in the nasal cavity, which is prone to bacterial infection. Kottemeyer proposes that the specific method of insertion (through the nostrils) might be an embellishment, possibly influenced by previous cases like Betty Andreasson's, which itself may have been influenced by Sandra Larson's account. He traces the narrative back to Sandra Larson's 1976 hypnotic session, where she recalled a nasal operation that was later interpreted as a regression of her sinusitis treatment. Betty Andreasson's 1977 regression mirrored Larson's account, further solidifying the idea that these narratives might be rooted in psychological experiences and fears rather than actual alien procedures. Kottemeyer suggests that the repetition of such specific details across different abductees points to a shared cultural origin or a form of 'cryptomnesia' rather than genuine alien activity.
Ufology Research and Trends
The issue also includes a bibliometric analysis of ufology citations by Martí Fló, titled "ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRICO DE CITAS SOBRE UFOLOGIA". This study examines the landscape of ufological research, identifying key journals, authors, and publication trends. The analysis reveals that the most effective sources for ufology research are databases from the Institute for Scientific Information (SCI, A&HCI, SSCI). The study categorizes articles into thematic areas, finding that scientific journals (especially popular science) and psychology/psychiatry journals are the primary venues for ufological research. Other areas include literature on fantasy and science fiction, as well as broader categories like history, sociology, and documentation. The analysis also tracks the chronological distribution of ufological documents, noting periods of increased publication activity, particularly in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The study concludes that interest in ufology remains active within the academic sector, albeit in a niche capacity, and shows a slow but steady growth.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the critical examination of abduction claims, the scientific analysis of alleged physical evidence, and the psychological factors that may contribute to such experiences. The magazine adopts a skeptical yet open-minded stance, presenting scientific findings and psychological interpretations alongside the reported phenomena. The editorial stance appears to favor rational explanations and rigorous investigation over uncritical acceptance of paranormal claims. The emphasis on scientific methodology, such as the SEM and EDAX analysis of the 'implant', and the critical review of abduction narratives, highlights a commitment to evidence-based understanding. The magazine also implicitly critiques the sensationalism often associated with ufology, seeking to ground the discussion in more empirical and psychological frameworks.
This issue of the magazine, spanning pages 80-95, focuses on the annual awards presented by Fundación Anomalía and includes reviews of several books related to ufology and alien abductions. The publication date is indicated as December 1998.
Conclusions General
The introductory section, titled 'Conclusiones generales,' asserts that professional research into the UFO phenomenon is ongoing and has been since the 1960s, though it notes that growth is slow and predominantly in the area of psychology, with other aspects, particularly physical phenomena, remaining in clear disadvantage. It suggests that collaboration between academic and amateur researchers, publishing mixed work in academic and ufological journals, could enrich the field. The text also discusses the potential for sociometric studies to map invisible colleges of collaborators and the importance of analyzing the obsolescence of documentary information through citation statistics. A future goal mentioned is the normalized presence of ufological information in daily newspapers, moving beyond opinion pieces to report on expert findings.
Fundación Anomalía Annual Awards
The magazine prominently features the "FUNDACION ANOMALIA OTORGA SUS PREMIOS ANUALES" (Fundación Anomalía Awards its Annual Prizes). The event took place in Santander between December 5th and 8th, 1998, coinciding with the 'V Encuentro del Colectivo Cuadernos' (5th Meeting of the Cuadernos Collective). The Patronato (Board of Trustees) reviewed the past year's activities and discussed economic data. A significant part of the meeting was dedicated to awarding prizes and grants, with submissions received from Europe and the Atlantic. The selection process was described as arduous due to the quality and quantity of submissions.
Several awards are detailed:
- Premio Internacional Zúrich (International Zurich Prize): Awarded to Professor Erling Strand for his research in the Hessdalen area (Norway) since 1984, which includes an automated tracking station. This prize was also awarded unanimously to Strand for his research in Hessdalen since 1984.
- Premio Cuadernos de Ufología (Cuadernos de Ufología Prize): Awarded by unanimous decision to D. Pedro Redón Trabal, President of the Center for Interplanetary Studies (C.E.I.), for his dedication to scientific research of the UFO phenomenon and his work in establishing the CATIBS and publishing works like 'Stendeky Papers d'Ovnis'.
- Premio Ricardo Caruncho (Ricardo Caruncho Prize): Awarded unanimously to D. Juan Antonio Fernández Peris for his work "Aterriza como puedas" (Land if you can), which deeply investigates the Manises case.
- Beca Universitas (University Scholarship): Awarded to D. José María González Infante for his proposal on the "Analysis and Ordering of the Epistolary Legacy of Manuel Osuna Llorente."
- Premio Géminis (Gemini Prize): Donated by José Ruesga, awarded to Julio Arcas Gilardi for his significant contribution to creating a cohesive team and his conciliatory approach.
- Premio Anaparéstesis (Anaparéstesis Prize): Also donated by José Ruesga, awarded to Vicente Juan Ballester Olmos for his extensive work in disseminating information and seeking support for Fundación Anomalía in 1998.
For 1999, new awards and grants were approved, including:
- Premio Cuadernos de Ufología: A diploma and trophy for a personality or entity that has distinguished itself in promoting UFO studies rationally and scientifically.
- Premio Internacional Zurich: Awarded with 250,000 pesetas for research or theoretical contributions in the field of UFO phenomena, emphasizing rationality and scientific methodology.
- Beca Universitas: Awarded with 150,000 pesetas for research projects within Spanish universities addressing UFO phenomena from natural and social sciences.
- Fondo Ricardo Caruncho (Ricardo Caruncho Fund): Established to stimulate research with grants of up to 25,000 pesetas for survey, analysis, and development projects.
Fundación Anomalía also committed to annually supporting ongoing projects, such as the rescue of over 600 ufological works published in scientific journals, initiated in 1998 following the Beca Universitas results.
In terms of publications, the quarterly '@nomalía' will be launched in 1999, directed by José Ruesga, to connect with friends and readers of 'CdU'. This publication will be supported by 'CdU' and 'Suplemento Internacional'.
Furthermore, the issue highlights the creation of a UFO Culture Database, a project initiated in 1998 with the collaboration of Antonio Méndez, aiming to computerize the first documented funds for the global investigation of Spanish UFO casuistry.
The library of Fundación Anomalía has been enhanced with bibliographic donations and new titles.
Future projects include the consolidation of the "Icaro en Urantia" exhibition, featuring 80 works by artist Fernando Calderón, and the display of 50 selected works in early 1999. The 'Diccionario Temático de Ufología' continues to receive international recognition, and the collective work "Ounis: ciencia ficción?" has been presented.
Book Reviews
Several books are reviewed in this issue:
- "Alien Discussions: Proceedings of the Abduction Study Conference" (Edited by A. Pritchard, D. Pritchard, J. Mack, P. Kasey, C. Yapp): This book summarizes the work and debates from a July 1992 conference on abduction phenomena, featuring contributions from prominent authors in the field. It is described as the most extensive work published on the abduction phenomenon to date.
- "The Ufo Mystery Solved" by Steuart Campbell: Campbell's central thesis is that approximately 90% of genuine UFO reports are explainable as mirages, particularly astronomical ones. The reviewer notes Campbell's skepticism and critical stance towards ufology, while also pointing out some questionable applications of his hypotheses to specific cases, such as the Manises and Puente de Herrera incidents.
- "Alien Life: The Search for Extraterrestrial and Beyond" by Barry Parker: This book updates knowledge on the search for extraterrestrial life, covering theories on the origin of life on Earth, life on Mars, and discussions on SETI projects and the possibility of intelligent life in the universe. It also includes a chapter on the possibility of past and present extraterrestrial visitation.
- "The Andreasson Legacy: The Search for Extraterrestrials and Beyond" by Raymond E. Fowler: This fifth book on the Andreasson case, one of the most studied abductions, is reviewed. The reviewer notes the witnesses' and investigator's reluctance to provide incontrovertible physical evidence and the author's own growing suspicion of abductions. The book details Fowler's diary from 1992-1996, focusing on frequent awakenings and bodily examinations.
- "The Alien Jigsaw: Researcher's Supplement" by Katharina Wilson: This book is presented as a firsthand account of supposed alien abductions, with the author attempting to provide information as it unfolded, including diary entries. The reviewer notes the difficulty in distinguishing between dreams and alleged real events and the increasing emphasis on supposed military abductions.
- "Connections: Solving our alien abduction mystery" by Beth Collings & Anna Jamerson: This book is described as providing a large amount of raw information on abduction culture in the United States, highlighting the interconnectedness of abductees. However, the reviewer notes the lack of clear evidence and the tendency for 'novelties' to have circulated in ufological circles for years.
- "Multiple Identities & False Memories: A Sociocognitive Perspective" by Nicholas P. Spanos: Spanos, an expert in hypnosis, argues that UFO sightings are not caused by extraterrestrial spacecraft but are mental constructs. He proposes a model for abduction experiences, suggesting they often stem from unusual or terrifying experiences like sleep paralysis, dissatisfaction with life, and are influenced by media and support groups, leading individuals to interpret their experiences through an abduction framework. The reviewer finds the book valuable for its insights into personality disorders and the phenomenology of abduction.
- "Left at East Gate: A First-Hand Account of the Bentwaters-Woodbridge Ufo Incident, its Cover-up, and Investigation" by Larry Warren & Peter Robbins: This book recounts the experience of Larry Warren, a security police officer who witnessed a UFO incident at the Bentwaters-Woodbridge base in December 1980. The reviewer notes the book's detailed account of the event and its alleged cover-up.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue are the promotion and recognition of ufological research, the critical examination of UFO phenomena through scientific and psychological lenses, and the detailed review of books that explore various aspects of UFO sightings and alien abductions. The magazine appears to present a balanced perspective, including skeptical viewpoints and detailed accounts of abduction experiences, while emphasizing the need for evidence-based investigation. The editorial stance seems to favor rigorous research and critical analysis, encouraging collaboration and the development of ufological studies within academic frameworks.
This issue of the magazine, spanning pages 100-106, focuses on UFO phenomena, with a significant portion dedicated to the book "Left at East Gate" by Larry Warren and Peter Robbins, and a review of "UFO 1947-1997: Fifty Years of Flying Saucers."
"Left at East Gate" by Larry Warren and Peter Robbins
The article delves into the account of Larry Warren, who claims to have witnessed a UFO incident near RAF Bentwaters. Warren describes seeing a large, pyramid-shaped machine with landing gear and bright blue lights. He also reported seeing a luminous orange ball that emitted figures described as "cat-eyed children" about a meter tall. The incident reportedly occurred near the base but not on U.S. Air Force jurisdiction, thus no official investigation was conducted by the 81st Tactical Combat Wing.
The text questions Warren's credibility, referencing a debriefing where he was reportedly forced to sign documents that downplayed the event, describing it as "strange lights among the trees." The article notes that Colonel Gordon Williams of the base was present. A naval intelligence officer, Richardson, is quoted as saying that the observed technology was far more advanced than human technology and that "numerous civilizations visit our galaxy from time to time and some have a permanent presence here."
The author expresses skepticism about the intergalactic relations managed by naval intelligence. The article mentions that months later, Warren left the army and became heavily involved in ufology, intending to write a book that never materialized. The book "Left at East Gate" is described as having irrelevant sections and literary pretentiousness.
Jennie Zeidman, an investigator for J.A. Hynek CUFOS, is cited as suggesting the book "casts more shadows than light on a very perplexing case." The article also references a document signed by Colonel Charles Halt (USAF) for the British Ministry of Defence in January 1981, which mentions the events but without the drama presented in Warren's book.
Further scrutiny of Warren's account comes from a FOIA request, which states that while strange activity occurred near RAF Bentwaters, it was not on U.S. Air Force jurisdiction, hence no investigation was carried out, justifying the lack of official files. In June 1991, Peter Robbins reportedly spoke with Colonel Halt, who accused Warren of fraud. A subsequent phone conversation involving Warren, Halt, and Robbins is mentioned, with Warren stating his book would serve a purpose.
Warren himself is quoted denying that his work is about "aliens and flying saucers" or "commanders shaking hands with aliens and repairing flying saucers," stating "that is something I have never said, that is completely ridiculous."
Halt is quoted responding to Warren: "Well, you have made statements that do not make sense, that do not contribute anything or that are definitively false. Now, whether you have done it intentionally or you have been misinterpreted... I don't know. That is something you have to resolve."
Warren's response is simply, "I understand, but..."
Halt continues, "You have said that there were people in places where it was impossible for them to be. You have involved people in doing things that I know they did not do..."
The article suggests that Warren's account is complex and suspicious, requiring in-depth study. It notes that Warren initially narrated a partial version of events under the pseudonym Art Wallace and later incorporated material from other sources, claiming it as his own. His credibility is deemed to be low, and his life since 1980 has revolved around the Rendlesham Forest incident, where he presents himself as the star witness.
Mark Pilkington, in a review for Fortean Times, is quoted stating, "It is an inherent property of UFO events that the more media coverage they receive and the more witnesses appear, the less sense they seem to make." Pilkington criticizes the book's prologue for being associated with a fascist movement and describes the work as a "bad novelization of a poor film," noting discrepancies in witness accounts, including Warren's own conflicting dates.
Pilkington suggests that Warren's influences include Bob Lazar and Budd Hopkins, and that Robbins realized Warren was not telling the truth, leading to speculation that the National Security Agency might have experimented on him. Pilkington concludes that "something strange happened... and someone is determined to keep it a mystery."
Jenny Randles, a prominent ufologist who has studied the case extensively, is mentioned as having written a book on the subject. She notes that while Warren may have seen something, his account does not align with reality. The article expresses hope that Randles's book will provide clarity, as the reviewed book is considered to contain "a lot of chaff" and not an objective testimony.
References are provided for the cited works and articles.
"UFO 1947-1997: Fifty Years of Flying Saucers"
This section reviews the book "UFO 1947-1997: Fifty Years of Flying Saucers," edited by Hilary Evans and Dennis Stacy. Jerome Clark is quoted calling it the "best book of 1997." The reviewer considers it the best book of the decade, a collective work that blends European sensibility (from British editor Evans) with North American perspective (from American editor Stacy). The book was published by John Brown Publishing, the publisher of Fortean Times, in May 1997.
The reviewer, who is also a contributor to the book, expresses some reluctance in reviewing it but feels compelled to highlight it as the best bibliography in the field. The book features essays by various ufologists, including:
- Jan Aldrich on "1947: The Beginning of the UFO Era."
- K. Arnold on his 1947 sighting.
- Anders Liljegren on the historical aspects of the 1946 "Ghost Rockets."
- Marc Hallet on his evolving beliefs about Adamski.
- Bill Chalker on the 1954 "UFO invasion" in Australia.
- Jacques Vallée's diary entries from May-July 1966.
- John Rimmer on a "UFO Flap Area."
The article also touches upon the "Blue Book" project, suggesting that it was used to assign orthodox explanations to test flights of U-2 and OXCART spy planes, and notes the poor relationship between the project director, Colonel Hector Quintanilla, and Dr. J. Allen Hynek.
Other contributors include Wim Van Utrech, who is critical of the Belgian UFO wave of 1989-1990, and Jenny Randles, whose contribution is described as a distillation of years of experience and empirical axioms.
The book also includes work by V.J. Ballester Olmos on the declassification of military UFO files, Karl Pflock on Roswell, James Moseley, Jerome Clark, Mike Swaords on Donald Keyhoe and the Pentagon, Chris Rutkowski on the Canadian landing at Langenburg, Ray Fowler on the Allagash abductions, Ion Hobana on Romanian cases, Cynthia Hind on African episodes, and Vladimir Rubtsov on Russian experiences.
"Abducción" by Antonio Ribera
This section briefly mentions the book "Abducción" by Antonio Ribera, published by Ediciones del Bronce. It describes the book as a significant work by a veteran UFO divulgator on the controversial topic of abductions, aiming to provide a historical overview and explore the phenomenon's development throughout humanity's history.
"Extractos de 'Sabiduría Ufológica'" (Excerpts from 'Ufological Wisdom')
This section presents a list of aphorisms or sayings related to ufology, compiled by Manuel Borraz from the "Ortotenia" mailing list. These sayings offer humorous and sometimes cynical advice on how to approach UFO cases and evidence. Examples include "Flying lights, a trace in the field," "Better a crashed saucer than a hundred flying," and "The more time and distance, the more impressive the saucers appear."
"Diccionario Temático de Ufología" (Thematic Dictionary of Ufology)
This section promotes the "Diccionario Temático de Ufología" (DTU), a book described as indispensable for UFO enthusiasts. It highlights its 416 pages, over 500 illustrations, and a bibliography of 267 titles. Reader testimonials praise the book for being informative, comprehensive, and highly recommended for those entering the field of ufology.
Fundación Anomalía
The final section describes Fundación Anomalía, a non-profit entity created by experienced national researchers with the backing of UFO scholars. It is associated with the journal "Cuadernos de Ufología" and aims to promote the study of anomalous aerial phenomena from a rational and scientific perspective. The foundation manages archives, bibliographies, and cultural legacies related to ufology, and provides grants and scholarships for research.
Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance
The recurring themes in this issue are UFO sightings, particularly the Bentwaters incident, the phenomenon of alien abductions, and critical reviews of books and research within the ufology community. The editorial stance appears to be one of critical inquiry, questioning the credibility of certain witnesses and accounts while acknowledging the importance of comprehensive and well-researched works in the field. There is a clear emphasis on rational and scientific methodology when approaching UFO phenomena.