UFO Nyt - No 3 maj-juni 1982

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO-nyt
Issue: 24th year, No. 3, May/June 1982
Publisher: Skandinavisk UFO Information (SUFOI)
Country: Denmark
Language: Danish

Editorial: Besparelser (Savings)

The editorial, written by Flemming Ahrenkiel, discusses the "Proxmire Effect," named after U.S. Senator William Proxmire, who aggressively sought to cut NASA's budget for the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) program. Ahrenkiel criticizes Proxmire's narrow-mindedness, contrasting his focus on saving small amounts for SETI with his support for agricultural subsidies. The editorial also touches upon the argument that if advanced extraterrestrial civilizations existed, they would have sent probes, and since none have been detected, humanity might be alone. Ahrenkiel counters this by suggesting that such civilizations might have their own 'Proxmire' figures hindering their progress.

UFO-klassiker: Papua, New Guinea, 1959

This article by Kim Møller Hansen details a significant UFO case from Papua, New Guinea, in 1959. Pastor Norman E.G. Cruttwell collected 79 reports, with 61 occurring in 1959, particularly in June-July. Three reports stood out due to multiple witnesses and the sighting of "people" associated with the UFOs. The article focuses on observations made by Pastor William Bruce Gill and his mission in Boainai.

On the evening of June 26, 1959, Pastor Gill and others observed a luminous, circular object. The object descended, and four human-like figures were seen on its deck. The figures appeared to be performing actions and even waved back when observed by the witnesses, including Pastor Gill and a teacher named Stephen Gill Moi. The object emitted a blue light beam. The witnesses described the figures as being illuminated by a glow that did not seem to touch them directly.

Over the following days, multiple sightings were reported. On June 27, the object reappeared, and the figures were again observed. Pastor Gill noted that the figures seemed to be engaged in some activity and that one appeared to be watching them. The interaction of waving was repeated. The object's movements were described as unusual, including hovering, rapid changes in direction, and approaching the ground. The object also changed color from yellow to red and blue-green before disappearing.

On June 28, the phenomenon evolved, with multiple objects observed. Pastor Gill's report details sightings from 18:45 to 23:04, noting an increasing number of UFOs, some described as "mother ships." A loud, metallic bang was heard from the mission house roof.

Dr. Donald Howard Menzel, a known skeptic, attempted to explain the sightings as illusions caused by Venus, suggesting the witnesses, including Pastor Gill, were nearsighted and not wearing their glasses. He attributed the waving figures to optical illusions related to eyelashes and eye movements. However, the article points out that the UFOs were sometimes seen under cloud cover, and Gill did wear glasses. The article also dismisses the "Cargo Cult" theory as an explanation, noting that the specific areas of observation were not known for this phenomenon.

The article includes a letter from the Australian Ministry of Aviation, dated January 28, 1970, which states that inquiries into the Papua observations yielded no definitive conclusions, suggesting reflections on a cloud from an unknown light source.

Indrapporteringer: Danmark (Reports: Denmark)

This section provides a situation report of UFO sightings in Denmark for January 1-February 28, 1982, compiled by SUFOI's Report Central. Sightings are classified into categories:

• NL.1 (Nattelysfænomen 1): A point-like light without details.
• NL.2 (Nattelysfænomen 2): A light phenomenon with some extension and visible form.
• DL.1 (Dagslysfænomen 1): A point-like phenomenon during the day without details.
• DL.2 (Dagslysfænomen 2): A daytime phenomenon with some extension and visible form.
• NO.1 (Nærobservation af 1. grad): A UFO with clear details seen within 150 meters.
• NO.2 (Nærobservation af 2. grad): Similar to NO.1, but with evidence of the UFO having been present (landing marks, radiation, damaged vegetation, electrical disturbances).
• NO.3 (Nærobservation af 3. grad): A UFO hovering or landed, with observed beings or figures in or near the phenomenon.

The report includes a map of Denmark showing the locations of these reports and a key explaining the classification system.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently features detailed case studies of UFO sightings, often from historical archives, alongside contemporary reports from Denmark and abroad. There is a clear effort to present both observational data and analytical perspectives, including skeptical viewpoints (e.g., Menzel's analysis) and ufological interpretations. The editorial stance, as seen in "Besparelser," appears to be critical of overly dismissive skepticism and advocates for a serious investigation of UFO phenomena, while acknowledging the lack of definitive explanations. The magazine aims to inform its members and the public about UFO research and related topics.

Title: UFO-NYT
Issue: 3/82
Date: 1982
Publisher: SUFOI
Country: Denmark
Language: Danish

This issue of UFO-NYT delves into various aspects of UFO phenomena, including a comprehensive list of reported observations in Denmark, an examination of UFO detection technology, and an analysis of photographic and film evidence.

UFO Observations in Denmark (Jan-Feb 1982)

The magazine presents a detailed list of UFO observations received by SUFOI between January 1 and February 28, 1982. This section provides the date, approximate time, duration, location (by postcode), number of observers, and reported colors for each sighting. Locations mentioned include Gråsten, Korsør, Struer, Borre, Nyk. Falster, Nr. Alslev, Svenstrup, Jyderup, Nyborg, Lyngby, Copenhagen (Kbh. Ø and Kbh. K.), Randers, Viby Sj., Odense C, Tange, Nørresundby, Kolding, and Billund.

UFO Detectors

A significant portion of the issue is dedicated to UFO detectors, featuring a report by engineer Hans Voigt titled "UFO-DETEKTORER." This report covers the general problems associated with using UFO detectors, including detector sensitivity, placement, analog/binary registration, timing, partial and constant monitoring, data collection, and alarm systems. The report is written in a non-technical style, making it accessible to a broad audience and providing a much-needed overview of the work related to UFO detectors. The report is 38 pages, illustrated, and priced at 20 DKK.

Cheops Pyramids and Data Manipulation

This section reviews a new report by Per Andersen that examines the pyramid mysticism, with a focus on the Cheops pyramid. It explores the alleged mathematical mysteries within the Egyptian pyramids. The report is available for 20 DKK, including postage, from Skeptica.

UFO Reports from Denmark

Several specific UFO sightings from Denmark are detailed:

• August 2, 1981, Kerteminde: A gymnasium student and a friend observed three lights moving in crisscrossing paths for 5-10 seconds, described as star-sized and silent.
• November 6, 1981, Fraugde: A large object with a tail was seen over a field, described as bright white with a long, shimmering tail.
• November 28, 1981, Messinge: An older man in a car saw a bright, rectangular, silver object with a tail, moving from left to right.
• January 8, 1982, Nyborg: Two young women reported a large, round or oval object with a white glow, a red light, and other blinking lights, flying low and then ascending.

New Details in a 1973 Report (Helsingør)

This article revisits a 1973 near-observation in the Helsingør area. The witness, initially shocked, later recounted seeing a red, flaming object approaching rapidly. The object stopped about 50 meters away, then moved to a marshy area. The witness observed three people in black suits with large, luminous eyes inside the craft, described as having thin necks and angular heads, with antenna-like growths where ears should be. The witness was initially hesitant to share this account due to skepticism from UFO organizations.

UFO Wave Over Fyn

This article by Tommy Christensen discusses the phenomenon of UFO waves, questioning whether they are natural occurrences or indicative of increased UFO activity. It details a period in November 1981 where numerous UFO sightings were reported on the island of Fyn. The author describes various observations, including a small, flickering UFO over housing blocks, a bright yellow object, a rectangular object with a corona, and a luminous sphere with a long tail. Many of these sightings were initially attributed to natural phenomena like Venus, but some remained unexplained.

UFOs on Film

This article series by Ole Henningsen examines UFO footage. It discusses a film from June 1950 by Al Hixenbaugh of a spherical object, and a film from August 15, 1950, by Nicholas Mariana in Great Falls, Montana, showing two luminous objects flying in formation. The Mariana film was analyzed by various researchers, with Dr. Robert L.M. Baker classifying the objects as anomalous and unidentifiable, distinguishing them from known aircraft.

UFO? No! - Hoax? No! (Strøby Ladeplads Photo)

This article by Ole Henningsen clarifies a previous report about a photograph taken by Johnny Oehlenschläger on August 16, 1970. The article addresses a conclusion from the US organization Ground Saucer Watch Inc. (GSW) that the object was a hoax, likely a piece of black paper on glass. Henningsen states that Oehlenschläger never claimed the object was a UFO and that SUFOI's photo department did not consider the image a hoax. The article also discusses the analysis of the photo, noting that the object was small, flat, and at a distance, and that GSW's analysis was influenced by their prior interest in UFO phenomena.

Computer Analysis of UFO Photos

Ole Henningsen discusses the use of computer analysis for UFO photos, referencing an article on the principles of such analysis in UFO-NYT nr. 2/1981. He presents an analysis of four photos taken in September 1979, which showed a gas balloon at different distances. The analysis by Ground Saucer Watch Inc. concluded that the object was a physical entity of small size, possibly a balloon or model aircraft, and not a UFO of significant size. Henningsen expresses reservations about the subjectivity of such analyses, suggesting that prior knowledge of UFO phenomena might influence the results.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The magazine consistently explores UFO sightings, investigations, and analyses, with a focus on reports from Denmark. There is a clear interest in distinguishing between genuine unexplained phenomena and hoaxes or natural occurrences. The editorial stance appears to be one of open inquiry, while also maintaining a critical and scientific approach to evaluating evidence. The magazine encourages reader participation by soliciting information about potential UFO phenomena and photographic evidence. The articles highlight the challenges in definitively proving the existence of UFOs and the importance of rigorous analysis.

This issue of UFO-NYT, dated 3/82, features several articles and reports related to UFO investigations, with a strong focus on the Australian RAAF's involvement and the analysis of physical evidence and witness testimonies. The cover highlights computer analysis of UFO films, refuting theories of sun reflections from aircraft and suggesting the objects were intelligently controlled craft.

UFOs on Film: Analysis of Utah Film

The issue begins with an analysis of a UFO film taken by Delbert C. Newhouse in Tremonton, Utah, on July 2, 1952. Newhouse, a US Navy officer and experienced aerial photographer, filmed several luminous objects. He estimated 12-14 objects at an altitude of approximately 3,000 meters. One object notably changed course. Ground Saucer Watch Inc. performed computer analysis on the film, concluding that the objects were not aircraft and that the theory of sun reflections was invalid. The US Navy's photo laboratory in Anacostia, Maryland, spent over 1,000 hours analyzing the film, determining that it showed intelligently controlled craft, though they refrained from calling them spacecraft. Dr. Robert M.L. Baker also analyzed the film, comparing it to his own footage of birds and concluding that the objects in the Utah film bore no resemblance to birds.

Australian RAAF Investigations /2

This section, authored by William C. Chalker, continues a discussion on the Australian Air Force's (RAAF) UFO investigations, which spanned from 1960 to 1976 and covered 1023 reports. Two specific cases are detailed:

• UFO near Military Station (October 25, 1973): Two individuals observed a large, black, airborne object near North West Cape, Western Australia. The object was estimated to be at 600 meters altitude and accelerated at incredible speed, disappearing to the north. Details provided include its position, size estimation (similar to the Moon at a distance), and behavior.
• Landing in a Grusgrav (March 22, 1975): On Dingo Mount Flora Road in Queensland, two men and three women witnessed an object hovering over a gravel pit. They described matte, blinking lights of white to yellow hues attached to a large object with a round section on top. The object was estimated to be about 9 meters in diameter and hovered at 300 meters.

The article also discusses the RAAF's classification of physical traces related to UFO incidents, outlining several types of evidence, from those with a direct relation to UFO observations to those considered doubtful or fraudulent. The author notes that the RAAF's summaries of observations were often brief.

UFO-spor (UFO Traces)

Kim Møller Hansen contributes an article detailing the process of obtaining UFO-related documentation from the Australian Ministry of Defence (RAAF). He explains the RAAF's UFO report form, which includes a questionnaire for the observer and detailed notes from intelligence officers regarding military and civilian flights, astronomical data, and the observer's personality. Hansen notes that the RAAF's overviews are concise, with 1977 showing the highest percentage of unidentified incidents. He also mentions the ongoing effort to create a catalog of "physical traces" related to UFO events in Australia.

UFOs in Film (Continued)

This section revisits the Utah film, with the author agreeing with Dr. Robert M.L. Baker's assessment that the film does not show birds, classifying the objects as anomalous phenomena. It also references Kim Møller Hansen's previous article on the Utah film.

References and Sales

The issue includes extensive lists of references for the articles, citing various UFO journals, books, and official documents. It also features a section for sales of UFO-related materials, including back issues of UFO-NYT and books.

UFOLOGI: Analysis of "Soft" Data

Donald A. Johnson's article proposes a methodological framework for analyzing "soft" UFO data, which refers to non-physical evidence such as witness testimonies and reports. Johnson suggests a four-step approach: analyzing the witness, the report, the phenomenon itself, and the myth surrounding it. He argues that by applying disciplines like psychology, sociology, history, and folklore, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the UFO phenomenon, even in the absence of hard physical evidence. The article emphasizes the importance of witness reliability and the process of reporting, highlighting how societal factors can influence the data.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFO-NYT strongly emphasizes the importance of rigorous investigation and analysis of UFO phenomena. It highlights the efforts of organizations like Ground Saucer Watch Inc. and the RAAF in collecting and analyzing data, particularly films and physical traces. The magazine appears to adopt a stance that UFOs represent a genuine, anomalous phenomenon that warrants serious scientific inquiry, moving beyond simple explanations like misidentified aircraft or natural phenomena. There is a clear focus on distinguishing between credible evidence and speculation, and on the challenges of obtaining and interpreting data in this field. The editorial stance supports the idea that UFOs are a real, albeit not fully understood, subject of study, and encourages further research into both physical and non-physical evidence.

This issue of UFO-NYT, dated 3/82, delves into various aspects of UFOlogy, including the concept of the 'UFO myth,' the challenges of UFO research, and a review of a Japanese UFO photo catalog. The magazine features a mix of analytical articles, opinion pieces, and news briefs, reflecting ongoing debates within the UFO community.

The UFO Myth and Its Significance

The article "Myten" (The Myth) explores the concept of the 'UFO myth' from an anthropological perspective. It argues that the term 'myth' can be understood not just as a fabrication, but as a dynamic process that explains reality. In this context, the UFO myth serves as a way for people to make sense of unexplained phenomena, especially in a modern culture where traditional scientific explanations may be lacking. The author suggests that the UFO phenomenon is a 'living myth' because it provides answers to fundamental human needs for understanding and predictability in an uncertain universe. The article references Jung's concept of the 'modern myth' and highlights the psychological appeal of UFOs, connecting them to basic human desires and anxieties. It also touches upon the difficulty in studying myths and the role of anthropologists and folklorists in understanding their mechanisms.

UFO Research and Methodology

Several articles address the state of UFO research and the methodologies employed. Per Andersen's contribution, "Et ord med på vejen" (A word on the way), engages in a debate about the nature of UFOlogy, questioning whether it is merely a pastime or a serious scientific endeavor. He argues that SUFOI, as an organization, should not hold 'beliefs' about UFOs but rather focus on collecting and analyzing data. Andersen emphasizes the need for scientific rigor in data collection and analysis, suggesting that current data may not be sufficient to prove or disprove hypotheses about UFO origins. He also critiques the tendency for UFO organizations to prioritize publishing magazines over actual research due to financial constraints.

Frank Pedersen, in his response, defends the idea of forming hypotheses and exploring different models to explain UFO phenomena. He acknowledges the importance of scientific methods but also stresses the need for data to be collected in a defensible manner. He points out the lack of formal training for UFO report collectors and the need for more organized foundational research.

Iver O. Kjems, in "Reaktionerne..." (Reactions...), responds to Per Andersen's critique, defending the editorial stance of UFO-NYT. Kjems argues that the magazine aims to present a broad range of UFO-related material and that the use of accessible language, rather than 'expert jargon,' is intended to reach a wider audience. He defends the magazine's approach to publishing, stating that it publishes all credible material that comes to its attention.

Frank Lerbæk, in "Uvidenskabeligt 'tidsfordriv' kontra videnskabeligt tidsspild" (Unscientific 'pastime' versus scientific waste of time), criticizes Per Andersen's view, suggesting that it stems from frustration. Lerbæk argues that the UFO problem is complex and may not be solvable through conventional scientific methods alone, especially if the phenomena are extraterrestrial. He advocates for patience and a flexible approach to research, emphasizing that the UFO problem is not easily solved and that many individuals dedicate their free time to its study.

Japanese UFO Photo Catalog Review

"Japansk IFO-katalog" (Japanese UFO Catalog) by Kim Møller Hansen reviews a catalog published by the Japanese organization CBA International. The reviewer expresses disappointment that the catalog, despite its title, contains no actual UFO photographs. Instead, it presents 288 images that are categorized as potential misidentifications, including trick photos, natural phenomena, and known aircraft. The article details the catalog's background, including the surge in UFO sightings and photo contests in Japan during 1974, and the organization's efforts to provide a more scientific analysis of these images. The reviewer notes that while most photos are trivial, some required significant analysis. The catalog categorizes potential UFO images into groups such as navigation lights, satellites, astronomical objects, natural phenomena, and trick photos.

Anonymity Debate

The section "SYNSPUNKT - Anonymitet" (Viewpoint - Anonymity) features a continuation of a debate initiated by Per Borgaard regarding the anonymity of UFO witnesses. Borgaard argues that while he respects the decision of witnesses to remain anonymous, he believes that coming forward publicly can encourage others to share their experiences. He emphasizes that SUFOI should not pressure witnesses but should accept their willingness to be identified as a service to research. The editorial board acknowledges this debate and states that it will be discussed within SUFOI's representative body to clarify the organization's stance.

News Briefs and Other Items

"NOTITSER - Kort fortalt" (Notices - In Brief) provides short updates on UFO-related news. This includes information about "UFO-82," an annual event for UFO enthusiasts in Denmark, featuring lectures and discussions. It also reports on changes within the American UFO organization NICAP, including the election of a new board and the relocation of its archives. Additionally, a brief mention is made of an American fund for UFO research seeking donations.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the nature of UFOlogy as a field of study, the challenges and methodologies of UFO research, the significance of the 'UFO myth,' and the practicalities of UFO organizations. There is a clear tension between those advocating for rigorous scientific investigation and those who view UFOlogy through a more anthropological or even skeptical lens. The editorial stance, as expressed in the responses to Per Andersen, appears to be one of openness to a wide range of UFO-related material, while also emphasizing the need for credible evidence and a balanced approach to research. The magazine aims to serve as a platform for discussion and the dissemination of information within the Danish UFO community.

Title: UFO-NYT
Issue: 3/82
Date: 1982
Publisher: SUFOI (Scandinavian UFO Information)
Country: Denmark
Language: Danish

This issue of UFO-NYT delves into various aspects of UFO research and observation, with a strong emphasis on practical ufology and the scientific approach to the phenomenon. It features articles on the SUFOI's activities, research funding, optical observation techniques, and specific case studies.

SUFOI's Activities and Funding

The magazine opens with a section detailing the activities of a UFO research fund established in 1979. This fund provides financial support for UFO research, including covering legal costs for organizations like GSW/CAUS in their lawsuit against the CIA and NSA for UFO documents. It also supports initial investigations into newly declassified documents, offers an annual scholarship for the best UFO article, and has funded research into alleged alien abductions. Future projects include establishing a UFO data bank, studying Spanish UFO cases, and cataloging historical airship mysteries.

'Angel Hair': Myth or Reality?

A significant article examines the phenomenon of 'angel hair' – long, thin threads reported to fall from the sky, often linked to UFOs. The article, an excerpt from the UFO Research Australia Newsletter, discusses the work of Keith Basterfield, who reviewed numerous cases. While some instances have been explained as spiderweb phenomena ('flying summer'), Basterfield concludes that without professional analysis of physical evidence, there is little proof for the existence of genuine 'angel hair' beyond spiderwebs. A specific case from Vestjylland in September 1979 is mentioned as being well-documented and having a natural explanation.

Practical Ufology and Observation Equipment

Tommy Christensen contributes a section on 'Practical Ufology,' focusing on techniques for UFO observation tours. He emphasizes the importance of simple, quick, and secure information gathering, particularly in the optical field. The article discusses how sunglasses can alter the perception of objects, citing a case from Ohio where grey objects were mistaken for clouds. Another case from England involves a photograph of three dome-shaped UFOs that differed from the visual sighting, leading to speculation about camouflage or light manipulation.

Christensen then details various observation equipment. Polarization filters (PF) are highlighted for their ability to reduce light intensity and alter polarization planes. The article explains the use of single PFs and more advanced 'analyzer' systems. It also discusses the importance of studying UFO light emissions in infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) spectra, recommending specific films and filters. The challenges of atmospheric interference and the need for quality equipment are noted. The article suggests that IR filters are particularly useful for capturing sharp images in poor weather conditions.

Stereo Photography for UFO Observation

William F. Boomer, a professional photographer, advises on using stereo photography to determine the distance, size, and shape of stationary UFOs. This technique involves taking two photographs from different positions along a line perpendicular to the object's direction, allowing for precise measurements if the UFO is relatively close and there are fixed reference points in the background.

SUFOI's Internal Workings and Member Engagement

An interview with Bent Eriksen, a long-time SUFOI representative, sheds light on the organization's internal operations and how it addresses member inquiries. Eriksen explains that SUFOI actively disseminates research findings and reports unexplained UFO sightings. He notes that members are interested in learning more about the organization's internal work, which could encourage greater participation. Eriksen details his own extensive involvement in SUFOI, including his role as an area leader, managing UFO-NYT mailings, and heading the lecture department. He emphasizes the growing interest in UFO lectures and the positive reception from audiences.

Astronomical Observations: June/July

Tommy Christensen also provides a guide to astronomical observations for June and July. This section details planetary visibility (Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Venus), meteor showers (June-Lyrids, Capricornids, Alfa-Cygnids, Pegasids, Beta-Cassiopeids, Delta-Aquarids), and notable stars like Antares and Arcturus. A partial solar eclipse on July 20th is also mentioned, with a caution against direct observation.

SUFOI Support Fund and Detector Sales

The magazine includes information about the SUFOI Support Fund, which has raised over 4,000 Danish Kroner in its first year and is used to finance advertisements for UFO-NYT and book purchases. Additionally, SUFOI is selling the MFI-6 detector, described as a portable electronic device that detects changes in magnetic fields, potentially indicating UFO activity. The detector is priced at 215 DKK, with an optional external summer for 46 DKK.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue consistently promotes a scientific and investigative approach to ufology. It encourages members to actively participate in research, observation, and reporting. The editorial stance favors rigorous analysis and the use of scientific equipment and methods to understand UFO phenomena. There is a clear emphasis on distinguishing between myth and reality, as seen in the 'angel hair' article, and on the practical application of knowledge, as highlighted in the observation and equipment sections. The magazine also seeks to foster a sense of community and collaboration among its members through its 'Til og fra medlemmerne' section and by promoting SUFOI's various activities and services.