UFO Nyt - No 2 marts 1969

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO-NYT
Issue: 2
Date: March 1969
Publisher: S.U.F.O.I. (Skandinavisk UFO Information)

This issue of UFO-NYT delves into the practical aspects of UFO research, emphasizing the importance of accurate and detailed reporting from its members. It addresses the persistent problem of insufficient data, which hinders comprehensive analysis and statistical evaluation of UFO phenomena.

Editorial Stance and Key Concerns

The editorial, titled "Det er for dårligt..." (It's too bad...), expresses frustration over the low number of detailed reports received, despite increased public interest in UFOs. The editor highlights that while many UFO enthusiasts are eager for good observations, they often fail to fill out the necessary report forms, assuming others will do it. This lack of consistent reporting makes it difficult to build a robust database, even with decades of collected material. The article stresses that even if UFOs were proven to exist, further research would still be needed to understand their technical background.

Given SUFOI's limited financial resources for extensive research, the organization relies heavily on its members' willingness to contribute. The article argues against solely relying on foreign reports due to the lack of control possibilities. It emphasizes that a larger volume of reports increases the chances of confirming observations and identifying conventional explanations. The current sporadic material is deemed insufficient for identifying patterns or drawing statistical conclusions, leading to only annual classifications of reports by time and geography.

To address this, SUFOI is activating members by establishing alarm chains to increase the chances of sightings. The success of this initiative depends on individuals immediately informing the Report Central or their local representative when they see something unusual. This allows others to be alerted and potentially confirm the observation.

Guidance for Observers

Recognizing the need for better-quality data, the magazine features a comprehensive guide for UFO observers, titled "Vejledning for observatører" (Guide for observers) by Willy Wegner. This guide aims to equip members with the knowledge to identify and report phenomena accurately.

Preparing for Observation

Before an observation tour, potential observers are advised to scout and mark optimal observation points on a map. These points should offer a clear, unobstructed view in all directions, ideally with nearby features for height estimation if no altimeter is available. Observers should avoid areas with significant light pollution from towns and cities, as well as busy roads with strong headlights.

Equipment

Essential equipment includes a good quality binoculars, a camera with fast film, and a notebook and pencil. While not strictly necessary, an astronomical telescope can be useful. Walkie-talkies are recommended for communication between teams, though a simple flashlight can suffice for signaling if teams are close enough. A compass is also vital for orientation.

Identifying Aircraft

• The guide provides detailed criteria for distinguishing conventional aircraft from UFOs:
• Aircraft typically do not exceed the speed of sound over land.
• They do not make sudden changes in speed.
• They cannot perform abrupt maneuvers like 90-degree turns or sudden stops.
• Their shape generally remains consistent, with only relative changes due to the observer's viewpoint.
• Reflections of sunlight or moonlight can make them appear as glowing spheres.
• Engine noise may not always be audible, even at low altitudes, due to varying sound propagation.
• Aircraft in formation are rare, usually involving three or more.
• Aircraft near airfields may perform maneuvers, but within predictable limits.
• Landing and takeoff lights, as well as powerful side-mounted spotlights used for wing illumination, can be mistaken for UFOs.
• Standard aircraft lighting includes red and green wingtip lights, a white tail light, and anti-collision lights (often red-orange). Modern jets may have multiple anti-collision lights.

Common Misidentifications

• The guide lists several factors that can lead to misidentification:
• Flying through scattered clouds can make aircraft appear unusual, with perceived changes in shape, course, or pulsating lights.
• Flying over large cities at night can cause the underside of an aircraft to appear illuminated by city lights.
• Illuminated cabin windows can be misleading.
• Viewing an aircraft from the side, especially when it's angled, can make it appear cigar-shaped.
• Sunlight reflections can make aircraft look like glowing fireballs.
• Unknown experimental aircraft might appear in Danish airspace.

Identifying Satellites

Satellites are described as objects that cannot be seen during the day, with only a few being visible to the naked eye (e.g., Echo 2). They appear as star-like objects moving at varying speeds depending on their altitude. Reflections from sunlight can be seen through binoculars. Fainter objects may appear to blink or be matte, while brighter ones can be clear. Satellites might appear surrounded by a halo when viewed through clouds or haze. Their passage across the sky can last up to half an hour. Objects in orbit follow curved paths, while those without orbits have straight paths. Their appearance and disappearance can be due to entering or exiting Earth's shadow (eclipse). Satellites in retrograde orbits can appear in any part of the sky, but generally move from west to east. Unusual deviations like specific colors, changes in speed or direction, or formations could indicate an unidentified flying object.

Other Astronomical Phenomena

• Meteors: Often reported as UFOs, meteors typically descend steeply, can appear to break apart, and come in various colors (blue, green, white). Trained observers can distinguish them from UFOs.
• Bright Stars: Low-hanging stars on warm summer nights can appear red, pulsating, and larger than usual, with significant color shifts. Temperature inversions can create the illusion of movement, making stars appear to 'jump' or move erratically.

Other Misidentification Phenomena

• Balloons: Divided into toy balloons (which can drift far before bursting) and scientific balloons (often larger, carrying instruments, and sometimes equipped with reflective plates). Reflections from these plates, especially around sunrise and sunset, can be mistaken for UFOs. Scientific balloons are often brightly colored for visibility and can appear stationary or drift slowly, sometimes seeming to move against the wind.
• Sky Targets: In southern Denmark, targets used by the GDR (East Germany) can be mistaken for UFOs. They are often bright, stationary, and can be turned on and off.
• Birds: While larger birds' wingbeats are usually audible, wind can mask them. Geese flying in formation, especially in a 'U' shape at high altitudes, can be deceptive.
• Lights over the sea: Lights on the horizon over the sea can be from fishing boats or other vessels.
• Thunderstorms: Can cause 'suspicious flashes' and ball lightning.

Reporting UFO Phenomena

• The magazine includes a detailed UFO reporting form (UFO-SPØRGESKEMA) to be filled out by witnesses. It requests comprehensive information, including:
• Observer's name, address, age, and contact details.
• Details about the observation: date, time, duration, location, weather conditions (visibility, precipitation, wind, temperature).
• Number and description of objects (form, color, presence of tail, corona).
• Details about the object's behavior: course changes, altitude changes, speed changes, maneuvers, other effects (flashing, strange flight patterns).
• Sound, size estimation (using arm's length comparison), light characteristics (constant, pulsating, blinding).
• How the object was spotted and how it disappeared.
• Whether the object passed in front of or behind any landmarks.
• Whether photographs were taken or if there were other witnesses.
• Self-estimated speed, size, and distance.

The form also includes sections for drawing the object's shape and trajectory on a celestial diagram.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme in this issue is the critical need for systematic and accurate UFO reporting. The editorial stance is one of earnest dedication to UFO research, tempered by a realistic assessment of the challenges posed by insufficient data and the prevalence of misidentifications. SUFOI aims to educate its members and the public on how to observe and report phenomena effectively, thereby improving the quality of data available for analysis and advancing the understanding of UFOs. The publication emphasizes a scientific approach, encouraging critical thinking and careful observation to distinguish genuine anomalies from known phenomena.

Title: UFO-NYT
Issue: 55-63
Issue Date: June 1968
Country: Denmark
Language: Danish
Cover Headline: Hvad nu, USA? (What now, USA?)

This issue of UFO-NYT delves into the ongoing UFO debate, with a particular focus on the Condon Report and its implications. It also features reports from the Soviet Union and discusses the challenges and perspectives within UFO research.

Editorial Stance and Analysis of the Condon Report

The editorial expresses deep disappointment with the Condon-Condon Commission's report, criticizing its lack of imagination and its conclusions. The report's main points are summarized:

1. No scientific evidence found for "flying saucers" originating from another civilization.
2. Approximately 90% of UFO phenomena can be explained as natural occurrences.
3. UFO studies over 21 years have added little to scientific knowledge.
4. Further intensive study of UFO sightings is deemed useless.

The magazine questions the basis for these conclusions, particularly the claim of "scientific evidence" derived from only 59 reports, which are described as "hand-picked" based on preconceived notions. The 90% figure is seen as a familiar echo of previous US Air Force conclusions dating back to the 1953 Robertson Panel, which aimed to "systematically deny the existence of flying saucers."

The article criticizes the report for not finding scientific evidence *against* the extraterrestrial hypothesis, rather than finding evidence *for* it. It also points out the statistical anomaly of drawing conclusions from such a small sample size (59 reports out of potentially 200,000 worldwide).

Soviet UFO Observations and Research

Several articles highlight UFO observations and research in the Soviet Union, presenting them as credible and significant.

Dr. Felix Zigel's Confirmation: Dr. Felix Zigel, a prominent member of the Soviet UFO commission and professor at the Moscow Aviation Institute, confirms numerous UFO observations in Russia. He refutes the claims of Dr. Donald Menzel, who attributed UFOs to optical phenomena or ball lightning, stating that ball lightning is typically much smaller than observed UFOs.

Specific Soviet Cases:

• The 'Ischevsk' Incident (August 2, 1967): A Soviet vessel encountered a UFO described as a round object that stopped, emitted sparks of various colors, and then released a white mass, enveloping itself in a light fog.
• Kizlovodsk Observation (August 8, 1967): Astronomer Anatoli Sazanov and his colleagues at the astrophysical station observed a "gigantic UFO" with a diameter of approximately 180 meters.
• Tunguska Event (1908): Dr. Zigel suggests that the Tunguska event, which devastated a large area, might have been caused by an extraterrestrial spacecraft rather than a meteor. This theory is supported by a Soviet Academy of Sciences report from 1967, which concluded the event was not caused by a meteor or comet and involved significant static radioactivity.
• Soviet Aircraft Encounter: A Soviet TU-4 aircraft pilot reported an encounter with a pulsating, lens-shaped object that flew parallel to the aircraft, even after the TU-4 attempted evasive maneuvers. The object then ascended rapidly and disappeared.

Soviet UFO Book: The Soviet Academy of Sciences was set to publish a book on UFOs titled "The Inhabited Cosmos" in 1968, with contributions from notable researchers like Dr. James McDonald, Dr. Allen Hynek, Dr. Jacques Vallée, and Dr. Frank Salisbury.

Soviet UFO Commission: Dr. Zigel revealed the existence of an unofficial Soviet UFO investigation body formed in October 1967, which had already gathered numerous well-substantiated reports. He also noted that, similar to the West, there is resistance to UFO research within the Soviet Union, represented by figures like physicist Lev Artsimovitj.

UFO Methodology and Observation Techniques

Figures 1, 2, and 3, along with their accompanying text, provide guidance on how to document UFO observations. The emphasis is on detailed reporting, including sketches of the observation site and the object's maneuvers. Key elements to include are:

• Observation Point: Drawing the location of the observer.
• Measurements: Using known objects (like houses or telephone masts) as reference points for estimating distances, heights, and angles.
• Diagrams: Creating diagrams from different perspectives (e.g., side view, top view) to illustrate the observation.
• Details: Noting the observer's height, eye level, the height of the object relative to the horizon, and the distance to the object.
• Report Timing: Urging observers to file reports as soon as possible after an observation to ensure accuracy and recall of details.
• Uncertainty: Encouraging reporting even when uncertain, as the "Report Center" will filter out less reliable accounts.

Critiques and Counterarguments

Several individuals and organizations have voiced strong criticism of the Condon Report and the established scientific approach to UFOs.

• NICAP (National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena): This organization criticized the report for ignoring a "vast number of credible, unexplainable eyewitness accounts."
• Dr. David R. Saunders: A former member of the Condon group, Saunders resigned due to disagreements over the project's motives and methods, launching a strong attack on his former colleagues.
• Dr. James Edward McDonald: A professor of meteorology and climatology, McDonald called the Condon group's work a "wasted opportunity" for a truly scientific investigation. He had previously criticized the US Air Force's handling of UFO reports, accusing them of covering up and distorting information.

Notable UFO Cases and Anecdotes

The issue includes several intriguing UFO reports from around the world:

• Car Displacement: An Argentinian couple reported being enveloped in a dense fog, losing consciousness, and waking up 48 hours later on a different road, with their car's paint damaged.
• Artist's Encounter: An Argentinian artist was approached by a tall, blond man speaking an unknown language. He lost consciousness and awoke on a spacecraft, which then returned him to Earth, stating that "they" would monitor Earth to prevent a catastrophe.
• Argentinian Woman's Experience: An Argentinian woman described being taken aboard a spaceship by a "light blue man" in a phosphorescent suit and transported to a "green planet."
• Military Police Encounter: An oversergeant in the military police fired his machine gun at three tall, silver-clad beings emerging from an unknown craft. The beings directed a "shining ball" at the sergeant and his passengers, rendering them powerless.
• Nebraska Police Officer's Account: A Nebraska police officer was "paralyzed" by a being from an elliptical craft. The being "communicated" with him telepathically, suggesting the craft originated from another galaxy and used Venus or Jupiter as a base, drawing electricity to create a repulsion field.

Antistoff-Rumfart (Antimatter Space Travel)

This section explores the theoretical possibility of interstellar travel using antimatter propulsion. It suggests that such technology could enable travel at near light speed, potentially covering vast distances like 75,000 light-years to the Milky Way's edge within 21 years of "cabin time."

UFOs in the Danish Press (1968)

A review of Danish media coverage of UFOs in 1968 reveals a fluctuating public and press attitude.

• Negative Portrayals: Some articles, like one in Søndags B.T. by pastor Helge Rasmussen, attacked UFO claims, likening them to a "religious sect" and questioning the credibility of contactees.
• Positive/Neutral Coverage: Other articles, such as one in SVENDBORG AVIS, explored the "fup eller fakta" (hoax or fact) question, while SUPER LOVE published an article aimed at a younger audience.
• UFO Alert System: Frank Lærbæk established a UFO alert system in Fyn, which reportedly yielded good results.
• Scientific Skepticism: The article notes the existence of skepticism within the scientific community, exemplified by Phillip Klass's theory that UFOs are plasma phenomena, a theory contested by researchers like McDonald.

Dr. J. Allen Hynek's Perspective

In an interview, Dr. J. Allen Hynek, a long-time UFO consultant for the U.S. Air Force, emphasizes the credibility of UFO witnesses as the primary reason to take reports seriously. He criticizes the lack of progress in UFO investigation techniques over the past 20 years, attributing it to a lack of effective treatment of the subject. Hynek believes the UFO phenomenon is real and that reports from different nations show striking similarities. He advocates for either complete openness or silence regarding UFOs.

Regarding UFO photography, Hynek states that he often receives accusations of being anti-UFO photos. He requires original negatives and cameras, along with witness testimonies, to consider a photo authentic, a standard he has rarely met.

He also comments on the "invisible college" of scientists who believe in UFOs, suggesting that if he had the resources, he could mobilize many respected scientists to conduct serious UFO research.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the critical evaluation of official reports (like the Condon Report), the presentation of credible UFO sightings from various countries (especially the Soviet Union), and the ongoing debate between skepticism and belief in the UFO phenomenon. The magazine consistently champions the idea that UFOs are a genuine phenomenon worthy of serious scientific investigation, challenging dismissive attitudes and advocating for more open research. The editorial stance is clearly pro-UFO research, urging for a more thorough and less prejudiced approach to understanding these unexplained aerial phenomena.

Title: UFO-NYT
Issue: 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74
Year: 1968
Language: Danish

This issue of UFO-NYT provides a comprehensive overview of UFO sightings and related news primarily from 1968, with a focus on Danish, Swedish, and American reports. The magazine acts as a compilation of press clippings, personal accounts, and investigative reports, reflecting the growing public and media interest in unidentified flying objects during that era.

Danish Press Review (Page 1)

Willy Wegner begins with a review of UFO coverage in the Danish press throughout 1968. He notes early reports of a luminous, cigar-shaped object over Fyn in April and a significant UFO photograph taken by a school student in June. The establishment of the Hellerup UFO Klub by Peter Alf Hansen is mentioned, along with articles discussing UFOs in relation to time and space, and speculation about life on Venus. The latter half of the year saw increased coverage, with Ekstrabladet featuring a triangular object over Madrid and reports of UFO activity in South America. Articles in Søllerød Tidende and Jydske Tidende discussed the history of UFO investigations and questioned the reality of flying saucers, respectively. The issue also highlights a UFO photo taken over Nivaa Bugt and a review of Barry H. Dowding's book "The Bible and the Flying Saucers."

Wegner concludes his review by noting the mixed nature of UFO reporting in the Danish press, with some publications becoming more open to the topic. He expresses a desire for UFOlogists from other countries to provide similar reviews of their national press.

Wanaque Reservoir UFO Wave (Pages 2-3)

This section details the UFO sightings near the Wanaque Reservoir in New Jersey, USA, which gained attention in early 1966. The area, known for its large water reservoir, became a focal point for numerous observations, often involving triangular objects. The report recounts the initial sighting on January 11, 1966, by police officer Joe Cisco, who observed a white, silent object hovering over the reservoir. This was corroborated by other police officers and town officials, including Bentley Spencer, Director of Civil Defense, and the mayor.

The article notes that the activity continued, with a man reporting a white pulsating object on January 18th. The Wanaque case eventually reached the press, with The New York Times publishing an article on October 11th. The report questions why reservoirs were particularly targeted, presenting theories that visitors might be storing something in the clean water or require fresh water themselves.

A subsequent report describes a man named Ball who observed a circular object near Wanaque on January 12, 1968. He contacted McGuire and Stewart Air Force bases, which denied having aircraft in the area. Two jet aircraft were then seen over Wanaque. The Air Force later claimed to have been testing a new helicopter, but this explanation was met with skepticism. The official explanation eventually shifted to the planets Jupiter and Venus, a claim that is debunked in the article due to their positions in the sky.

Swedish UFO Reports (Pages 4-6)

This section features two detailed reports from Sweden, provided by the UFO-MOTALA group.

Gränna Observation (September 3-11, 1968): This report, based on a press clipping, details an observation by Weine Andersson near Sandviks gård. On September 11th at 20:34, Andersson observed an object resembling a half-sphere with a flat bottom, emitting an intense blue-white light. The object, approximately 2 meters in radius, descended towards his car, then moved over a field before ascending and disappearing at high speed. The investigation team included Carl-Axel Jonzon, Leif Nässlin, Lennart Carlsson, Jaan Noor, and Jan Lind.

Skoghall Observation (September 29, 1968): This report, based on an article from Värmlands Folkblad, describes an observation by Fru Dagmar Henriksen. Between 03:45 and 04:00 on September 29th, she saw a discus-shaped object, 15-20 meters in diameter, emitting white light from openings and red light in points. The object produced a low, hollow humming sound. A dog in the apartment below exhibited unusual behavior, whining and staring at the ceiling. Other witnesses, including Fru Britt Weden and Herr Lennart Hultorans, also reported seeing bright, unidentified objects. The conclusion drawn is that an object of unknown origin was visible at that time.

British UFO Sighting (Page 7)

Billist "followed home" by two luminous objects: This report details an incident on November 6, 1967, near Burnley and Heptonstall, Yorkshire, England. The witness, driving home from work, observed two football-sized, moon-colored objects. The objects hovered, moved erratically, and appeared to be following his car. The witness noted a dimming of his car's engine power, which was later attributed to a faulty spark plug. The objects eventually ascended vertically and disappeared. Two UFO researchers visited the witness five days later and found the account convincing, concluding that two UFOs were indeed observed.

Apollo 7 UFO Observation (Page 7)

This section reports on an observation made by the crew of Apollo 7. While flying over Australia, astronaut Cunningham reported that unidentified flying objects passed near their spacecraft. This information was relayed through the Swiss news agency and confirmed by the British news agency Reuter. The report highlights the significance of this observation, especially in light of numerous other UFO reports.

Astronauts and UFOs (Page 8)

This article discusses UFO observations made by astronauts, including Gordon Cooper, James McDivitt, Michael Collins, and John W. Young. Cooper's observation of a shiny green "saucer" over Australia was reportedly confirmed by an Australian tracking station. The article also mentions Collins' and Young's prior sightings of unknown objects and Collins' report of another observation over Australia during a Gemini mission. The article references Dr. Kurt Debus, director of the Cape Kennedy space center, who predicted that humanity would encounter "other living beings" in outer space, suggesting a level of awareness among scientists and officials.

Newfield, New York UFO Activity (Page 8)

This brief report notes a decrease in UFO activity in Newfield, New York, after a period of intense observations in the fall of 1967. It speculates that Cornell University's research into contacting extraterrestrial civilizations might be a factor. The article criticizes the Condon Committee's investigation methods in Newfield, describing them as dismissive and impressionistic.

UFO Demonstration over Columbus, Ohio (Pages 8-9)

This report describes a significant UFO event over Columbus, Ohio, on January 23, 1968. Law enforcement officers, journalists, and citizens witnessed two bright lights that appeared round and were moving erratically. The objects were described as being the brightest things seen in the sky, resembling spotlights. They hovered for about 30 seconds, then shifted positions. Two objects then descended towards each other and remained stationary. The report mentions that military aircraft were seen in the area, possibly attempting to intercept the objects. The objects eventually disappeared, with some vanishing abruptly and others fading eastward.

"Terrified" Truck Driver Sees Alien Craft Land (Pages 9-10)

This detailed account describes an encounter by truck driver Carl Farlow near Fordingbridge, England, on November 6, 1967. Farlow's truck lights and radio suddenly failed, forcing him to brake. He then saw a bright green, disc-shaped object descend rapidly and hover 15 meters away. The object emitted a high-frequency whine. A dark gray box extended from the object's undercarriage, and two arms swept the road surface, appearing to "vacuum" the area. A short, straight rod also extended from the undercarriage. Simultaneously, Farlow saw another vehicle, a white Jaguar, approaching. As the Jaguar neared, its lights suddenly went out, and it appeared to crash into the bushes. After about three minutes, the UFO retracted its arms and probe and ascended rapidly. Immediately, Farlow's truck lights and radio returned to normal. He found the Jaguar driver, a bald man, visibly shaken, who exclaimed, "Good God, what was that?" The driver, disbelieving that anyone would believe his story, drove off. Farlow contacted the police, who sent constables Roy Nineham and Jeffrey Paulley. The constables found Farlow very frightened and sent a full report to the Ministry of Defence. The Ministry confirmed that an investigator was sent to interview Farlow, who provided a sketch of the object. The Ministry stated that the report was considered "sufficiently interesting" but offered no explanation, ruling out military testing.

Cigar-Shaped Object Over Belmont, Australia (Page 10)

This report describes a sighting by Fru Ann Robinson in Newcastle, Australia, on August 25, 1968. She observed a cigar-shaped object moving from north towards the sea. It was described as resembling a tadpole, semi-transparent, and glowing brightly from the center outwards. The object appeared colossal, measuring about 5 cm at arm's length, and even larger when viewed through binoculars. It gradually disappeared as its distance increased.

Unknown Metal Found in Colombia (Page 10)

This brief report mentions that on February 12, 1968, a flying object exploded over Llanos, Colombia, with two deafening explosions. Local inhabitants reported seeing a strange, metallic, disc-shaped object before it crashed. An investigation team found an impact crater and metal fragments. A large piece, 3 meters in diameter and weighing 57 kg, was sent to Bogota.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFO-NYT consistently highlights the growing public and media interest in UFO phenomena during 1968. The editorial stance appears to be one of open investigation and reporting, presenting various sightings and accounts without immediate dismissal. There's a clear emphasis on documenting observations from different countries, including Denmark, Sweden, the USA, and Australia. The magazine seems to favor detailed eyewitness accounts and investigative reports, often questioning official explanations or lack thereof, particularly concerning military involvement or cover-ups. The inclusion of specific details like object shapes, sizes, behaviors, and witness testimonies underscores a commitment to presenting the evidence as reported. The recurring theme of official skepticism versus persistent sightings suggests an underlying editorial sympathy for the UFO phenomenon and its potential significance.

This issue of UFO-NYT, spanning from number 75 to 84, covers UFO sightings and reports primarily from late 1967 and 1968. The content is predominantly in Danish, with some sources cited in English. The issue highlights a series of events that challenge conventional explanations, particularly focusing on police observations and pilot encounters.

The Eventful Autumn of 1967

The lead article, "Det begivenhedsrige efterår 1967" (The Eventful Autumn of 1967), details numerous UFO sightings that occurred in England during the latter part of 1967. It begins by refuting the idea that UFO reports are confined to the 'silly season,' citing the volume and credibility of recent observations.

The 'Fire Cross' in Devon

One of the most prominent cases described is the 'fire cross' sighting by two police officers, Roger Willey and Clifford Waycott, in Devon on October 24, 1967. They initially saw a large, clear, cross-shaped object. Later, they observed it again, joined by a second similar object. The objects were seen at a distance of about 40 yards and followed a course over the road they were on. Despite the officers driving at speeds up to 80 mph (130 km/t) on winding roads, the objects maintained their position. The sighting lasted nearly an hour, with the objects disappearing around 04:58.

Inspector Harding, the press officer for the Okehampton police, initially suggested the object might have been Venus, a theory the article dismisses as naive given the circumstances. The article notes that the night sky over central Devon was cloudy.

Widespread Sightings Across England

On the morning of October 25th, the 'fire cross' phenomenon was reported across East Sussex by 11 police officers. Further reports came from North Devon and from an amateur astronomer, Peter Baker, in Hastings. The Royal Observatory at Herstmonceux was involved, though Mr. Baker, a hospital clerk, was described as a recognized observer.

Other Police Reports

The issue details further police sightings:

• Kidlington, Oxfordshire: Two police officers reported seeing two large, dark, oval objects, approximately 50 ft in diameter, at an altitude of 500-600 ft, moving north.
• Bacup, Lancashire: Police officer Brian Earnshaw reported a cigar-shaped UFO hovering about 250 ft above the police station. It was described as 50 ft long and 10 ft in diameter, with portholes but no visible propulsion. Two other officers corroborated this sighting.
• Glossop, Derbyshire: Six police officers reported a UFO hovering for three-quarters of an hour, moving erratically.
• Cheshire: Police headquarters received identical reports, leading to an investigation by the Ministry of Defence.
• Wigtownshire: A Scottish coastguard reported seeing a 'silver wheel hub'.
• Cosham, Hampshire: Police officer John Whitcombe and his family saw an object glowing with sharp white light.
• Southampton: Police officer John Whitcombe reported seeing a similar object while driving.
• Lancing, Sussex: Three police officers reported a silver dot moving rapidly northeast. Ex-police officer Fred Smith described it as a clear light shaped like a Lorraine cross.

Attempts at Explanation

The article mentions that reports continued to appear in the press. The Sunday Telegraph reported two police officers seeing an unidentified flying object moving at high speed towards the ground in Essex for 20 minutes. The Sun reported patrolling officers seeing a clear, cigar-shaped object over Worthing, Sussex.

Authorities initially offered the Venus explanation, but this was increasingly seen as inadequate. A vicar from Dorset suggested the objects could be American tanker planes refueling in formation. This theory was met with skepticism.

An examination of U.S. Air Force flight tables suggested that refueling operations might explain some, but not all, of the thirty observations. A U.S. Air Force spokesperson confirmed that night maneuvers in Scotland could not have been observed by police in England, noting a lack of reports from Scotland during that period.

Sightings in Ireland and Wales

While significant activity was reported from Wales, it was not widely covered in the press, though Welsh television aired special programs. Three individuals from Belfast, including two teachers, reported seeing mysterious triangular objects with blinking lights flying about 500 ft overhead on October 25th. Police in Anderstown, Ireland, investigated a report of a UFO landing but found no results.

UFOs in Other Regions

Brazil: UFO Follows Military Aircraft

An article from El Mundo (March 23, 1967) reports that fourteen passengers and four crew members on a Brazilian military aircraft and a photo-mapping plane from Cruzeiro do Sul saw a strange object following their plane. The object was described as luminous and reddish, circling the military aircraft at a distance that prevented photography. When the Cruzeiro do Sul plane attempted to approach, the UFO quickly moved away.

Mexico: Pilot Near Crash

On February 11, 1968, a Guatemalan pilot, Colonel Alfredo Castaneta, and his co-pilot, Captain Carlos Samayoa, reported a near-collision with a 'flying saucer' over Oaxaca. The object, described as about 33 feet in diameter with a red sphere on top, flew towards their cockpit at high speed, passing within 66 feet. Stewardesses and passengers also witnessed the object.

Boulder, Colorado: Observation Report

An article by Lee Trenholm details an observation made by Mrs. Dorothy Conner in Boulder, Colorado, on May 25, 1968. She observed a brilliant white object hovering and then moving rapidly north, performing square maneuvers. The object was described as similar in size to a 50-cent piece held at arm's length, resembling two plates joined at the edge with a darker band. It left a trail of luminous, sharply defined light. Mrs. Conner reported the sighting to the police.

Further reports from Boulder include observations from Walt Sneddon and Dianne Aldrich near a drive-in theater, who saw an object described as football-shaped or like two plates joined edge-to-edge. Miss Jean McCarron also reported seeing a white object the size of a tennis ball.

Scandinavian Sightings

Norway:

• Tønsberg Area: Herr G. E. reported seeing a spherical light hovering about 300 meters above Teie on December 14th. The object moved at the same speed as his car (approx. 55 km/t) and later reappeared, following him. The observation lasted from 18:00 to 18:30.
• Foynland: A man reported seeing a luminous object about 400 meters away and 300 meters high.
• Teie: A schoolboy saw a luminous sphere.
• Nøtterøy: Several reports of luminous spheres were made.
• Nord-Odal: An object reportedly split into two, with one small object descending.
• Stord: A possible satellite descent or meteor fall was observed.
• Tsvær: A strange light that did not follow a straight course was observed.
• Lørenskog: A low-flying, silent object with a faint red-orange glow was seen.

Denmark:

• Østjylland: Three farmers reported a loud, high-pitched humming sound and a bright, cream-colored light that moved erratically.
• Horsens: A dome-shaped object appeared suddenly, emitting a bright green light.
• Valnes: A fisherman observed a large, dimly lit object moving over the water, changing colors from green to violet, red, and clear. The object reappeared and followed his boat.

Sweden:

• Øksnes: Reports of luminous objects moving from southwest to northeast.
• Rana Blad: A luminous object with a reddish flame was observed.
• Gimlekollen: A strange star-like light, possibly Venus, was observed.
• Kristianssand: A similar object was seen and photographed.

Luminous Object Causes Attention

This section details a significant UFO alarm on December 21st, with observations from both North and South Jutland, Denmark. A strange luminous object appeared in the western sky around 17:30. It was described as a bright core, 2-3 times the diameter of Venus, surrounded by a green, corona-like mist that expanded to twice the diameter of the moon. The object appeared stationary relative to the stars. It disappeared at 18:30 but reappeared about 30 minutes later, this time with an elongated, half-moon shape, visible until 19:30.

The article notes the unusual nature of the sighting, given its simultaneous observation from widely separated locations. It also points out that the Apollo-8 mission was on the far side of the moon at the time, making it unlikely to be related to the space program.

The phenomenon was not considered astronomical in origin but bore some resemblance to barium experiments conducted in Norway to create artificial aurora borealis. However, the location over the North Sea made this explanation improbable.

SAS Pilot Report

An SAS flight captain, K. H. Jensen, reported observing a large, milky-white fog patch, 1.5-2 times the diameter of the moon, from his Caravelle aircraft over the Baltic Sea on December 21st. For the first 6-7 minutes, a luminous core was visible. The crew observed the object for about 30 minutes until descent.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

This issue of UFO-NYT consistently highlights reports from credible witnesses, particularly police officers, pilots, and ordinary citizens. The recurring theme is the observation of unidentified aerial phenomena that defy conventional explanations such as aircraft, satellites, or known celestial bodies like Venus. The magazine emphasizes the detailed nature of these reports, including descriptions of object shapes, sizes, colors, speeds, and behaviors. There is a clear editorial stance that these sightings represent genuine, unexplained phenomena, and the article "Det begivenhedsrige efterår 1967" explicitly questions the adequacy of official explanations like Venus. The "Kommentar" section even speculates on whether historical 'gnomes and trolls' might have been UFO occupants, reflecting a willingness to consider unconventional possibilities. The publication also includes a regular "Rapport Hjørnet" (Report Corner) summarizing Scandinavian observations and a "UFO-Billed Heftet" (UFO Picture Booklet) which is noted as sold out, with a new publication "UFO-Orientering" announced.

This issue of UFO-NYT, spanning from number 85 to 94, appears to be a collection of articles and reviews from early 1969, focusing on UFO phenomena, space exploration, and related scientific theories. The cover prominently features the title "ASTRONOMI OG RUMFORSKNING" (Astronomy and Space Research), with an illustration of an observatory.

Apollo 8 and UFO Observations

The issue begins with an account of a UFO sighting that occurred in December 1968, observed in both Denmark and Germany. Initially, the object's brightness fluctuated, and its movement was noted. The report mentions a SAS captain's observation, which increased interest, especially as it coincided with observations from different locations, ruling out simple explanations like Apollo missions or known astronomical phenomena. The investigation continued with undiminished vigor.

Magister Asger Lundbak is quoted as explaining the phenomenon as the communication satellite Echo-2, launched in 1964. However, the author expresses doubt, finding it unlikely that a large, almost stationary luminous spot with a diameter twice that of the Moon could be mistaken for the small point of light that Echo-2 would appear as. The author contrasts this with the description of Echo-2 moving across the sky over half an hour.

A detailed report from Norway, published in "Agderposten," describes a family's observation of a round mist with a stronger center, from which bright "sparks" were ejected. The phenomenon was observed from various parts of Norway, seemingly at the same altitude and direction as seen from Denmark. Astronomically inclined Norwegians placed the object in the constellation Aquila, about 30 degrees above the horizon, aligning with the SAS captain's 260-degree bearing.

Further confirmation came from England, where the object was observed and photographed. An amateur astronomer, Henry Hatfield, photographed it with a 30 cm telescope and published the image in "Daily Mirror" on December 23rd. The article then connects these observations to the Apollo 8 mission. The timing of the S-4B stage separation, which occurred around 17:13, closely matched the observation times. The final phase of fuel expulsion from the S-4B stage was photographed in San Fernando, Spain. The puzzle was solved: the UFO was identified as Apollo 8. The article highlights how ordinary people can accurately report on unknown phenomena and emphasizes the value of even a few reports from different observers.

Scientific Theories and Space Exploration

Faster-Than-Light Travel and Tachyons

An article by P. E. Hopkins discusses the implications of Einstein's theory of relativity, which posits that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. This limitation poses a significant barrier to interstellar exploration, making journeys to even the nearest stars, like Alpha Centauri, prohibitively long. The article introduces a revolutionary theory by American physicist Dr. Gerald Fienberg of Columbia University. Fienberg proposes the existence of a new particle, the tachyon, which is theorized to travel at nearly infinite speeds, with its speed increasing as its energy decreases. While attempts to detect tachyons have not yet succeeded, the theory suggests they could enable instantaneous communication across vast distances, potentially revolutionizing space travel and communication, though it also carries risks of misuse.

Soviet Space Achievements

Jurij Marinin, an APN commentator, writes about the perspectives opened by the latest space endeavors, specifically the successful docking of two Soviet spacecraft, Soyuz-4 and Soyuz-5, and the transfer of cosmonauts. This achievement led to the establishment of the world's first experimental space station with four crew members. The article details the significance of this feat, comparing it to the first manned spacecraft launch and automatic docking. The ability to transfer between spacecraft in free space is presented as a crucial step, enabling the sending of crews to space stations in Earth orbit or to unmanned spacecraft. It also allows for crew evacuation or rotation on long-duration missions, such as those on future space stations or interplanetary journeys. Furthermore, it opens possibilities for rescuing cosmonauts from damaged spacecraft.

The article also touches upon the regular maintenance and repair of automated space stations, such as astronomical observatories in orbit. Cosmonauts could perform checks, make adjustments, and replace faulty components, significantly enhancing the capabilities of these stations. The ability to move between spacecraft, either through free space or internal hatches, is deemed essential for these advanced space missions.

Apollo 8's Legacy

Another section reflects on the significance of the Apollo 8 mission. It notes the Soviet Union's statement about not necessarily aiming to surpass the Americans in reaching the Moon, suggesting a degree of solidarity. The article mentions the communication link between Washington and Moscow to keep Professor L. Sedov's team informed about the American experiment, indicating mutual cooperation. It also raises the possibility of standardized docking mechanisms for spacecraft, drawing a parallel to standardized propellers used during World War II. The article touches upon potential electrical and electronic failures in spacecraft and the use of batteries with chemical combustion to mitigate these issues.

The text also discusses the precise landing of Apollo 8 in the Pacific Ocean, only 11 seconds behind schedule. It suggests that delaying the launch by an hour would have allowed for a daylight landing. The choice to re-enter the atmosphere at dawn is explained as a measure to allow the pilot to visually identify the narrow re-entry angle in case of communication failure with Houston. The article also references the observation of "unidentified" objects accompanying the Apollo spacecraft, suggesting that these were not mere photographic errors or meteorites.

UFO Literature Reviews

The issue features an extensive review of UFO-related books, covering a wide range of topics and authors. These include:

• Flying Saucers on the Attack by Harold T. Wilkins: Discusses events between the world wars, WWII Foo Fighters, and historical UFO sightings.
• Flying Saucers Uncensored by Harold T. Wilkins: A continuation of the previous book, offering more observations and interpretations.
• The Truth About Flying Saucers by Aimé Michel: Covers early reports, the Mantell case, and observations over various regions like North Africa, Equatorial Africa, Europe, and France.
• On Board the Flying Saucers by Gavin Gibbons (originally They Rode In Space Ships): Details contact reports by Daniel Fry and Truman Bethurum.
• Flying Saucers and the Three Men by Albert K. Bender: Recounts Bender's experience with "men in black" and the silencing of UFO witnesses.
• The Terror Above Us by Malcom Kent: Similar to the Betty and Barney Hill case, involving two brothers, Jason and Robert Steiner, who were allegedly abducted.
• Why Are They Watching Us? by Allen Louis Erskine: A dialogue between the author and a skeptical policeman, based on works by Frank Edwards and John G. Fuller.
• The UFO-Report by Irving A. Greenfield: A collection of UFO reports, including known and previously unknown observations.
• The Flying Saucers Reader edited by Jay David: A previously reviewed compilation.
• Flying Saucers Are Hostile by Brad Steiger and Joan Whritenour: Focuses on UFO reports involving negative incidents.
• Strangers from the Skies by Brad Steiger: A book composed of 30 chapters of UFO reports, some new and some previously covered.
• Flying Saucers: Hoax or Reality? by L. Jerome Stanton: Covers topics like Martian surveillance, the origins of the UFO phenomenon, Project Grudge, Project Blue Book, and UFO research criticism.
• What We Really Know About Flying Saucers by Otto Binder: Discusses UFO colors, the nature of ufologists, and the US Air Force's stance on UFOs.
• Flying Saucers Occupants by Coral and Jim Lorenzen: Features landing reports, contactee accounts (including Villas-Boas and Joao Martins), and observations from Europe, South America, and the US.
• UFO's Over the Americas by Coral and Jim Lorenzen: Includes chapters on underwater UFOs and UFOs and the CIA.
• Mysterious Fires and Lights by Vincent H. Gaddis: Explores the theory of UFOs as extraterrestrial beings.
• Flying Saucers Here and Now! by Frank Edwards: A follow-up to his earlier book, clarifying some points and interpretations.
• Incident at Exeter by John G. Fuller: Details the Muscarello case and other US UFO incidents from 1965.
• The Interrupted Journey by John G. Fuller: A detailed account of the Betty and Barney Hill experience.
• Flying Saucers, Where Do They Come From? by Richard Tampling: A book referenced from a previous review.

The issue also lists other notable UFO books, including works by Edward J. Ruppelt, Jacques Vallée, Gray Barker, Bill Adler, Gabriel Green, Jim Moseley, and Barry H. Dowding.

UFO Meetings and Events

The magazine announces upcoming UFO meetings:

• A public UFO meeting in Ballerup on Friday, March 21st, featuring a presentation by Major Frank Pedersen, followed by a showing of UFO slides. Tickets are 5.00 DKK.
• The art and philosophy center Solvognen in Odense holds weekly UFO meetings on Mondays and a special lecture by editor Leif Eckhoff Pedersen on Sunday, March 23rd.

Book Review: James E. McDonald's "UFO'er, det største videnskabelige problem i vor tid?"

A review from "Bogens Verden" (Book World) discusses James E. McDonald's book, which critiques the US Air Force's "Bluebook" project and Dr. Menzel's findings, deeming them untrustworthy. The review notes that the book presents a strong, well-supported critique of "Bluebook" and Menzel. The latter half of the book includes 18 selected reports from 1965-67. While the reports seem plausible, the reviewer finds the leap to accepting the hypothesis of interplanetary probes from distant solar systems to be significant, describing the subtitle as "a storm in a teacup." Nevertheless, the book is considered the best Danish publication by a proponent of the "UFO problem."

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the intersection of UFO phenomena with scientific inquiry, space exploration, and theoretical physics. There's a clear effort to demystify some UFO sightings by linking them to known technological advancements like satellite launches and space missions (Apollo 8). Simultaneously, the magazine explores more speculative scientific ideas, such as tachyon particles and the possibility of extraterrestrial life and travel. The editorial stance appears to be one of open-minded investigation, presenting both established scientific explanations and more unconventional theories, while also providing a platform for UFO enthusiasts through meeting announcements and extensive literature reviews. The publication seems to encourage readers to submit their own reports and engage with the subject matter critically but without outright dismissal of possibilities.

This issue, dated June 1968, is titled 'KONTAKTADRESSER' (Contact Addresses) with a prominent cover headline 'Piloter ser UFO'er' (Pilots see UFOs). It primarily serves as a directory for UFO enthusiasts in Denmark and Norway, while also including a report on pilot sightings of UFOs in Peru.

UFO Sightings in Peru

The main article details two separate incidents reported by crews of the Peruvian airline Fawcett. The first incident, from Lima on February 8th, involved two passenger aircraft crews reporting observations of 'flying saucers' over the Peruvian coast.

The second, more detailed report, describes an event from the previous week where another Fawcett crew and passengers saw an object, likely a flying saucer, which followed their plane for nearly an hour on the route from Lima to Chiclayo in northern Peru. According to the latest information, a Fawcett flight, piloted by Captain J. Klein, was intercepted by a flying saucer off the resort town of Pecusana, 50 km south of Lima. The object 'suddenly appeared and was surrounded by a reddish-blue glow'.

In another instance, a Fawcett flight experienced turbulence due to the rapid movements of a strange object flying around it. This occurred over a region 700 km south of Lima. The report identifies Captain L. Lujan, assistant to Fawcett's operations manager, as the pilot, along with his second pilot N. Coli from Lima.

The source for this report is cited as the Isle of Wight UFO-Investigation Society, June 1968.

Contact Addresses in Denmark

The majority of the publication is dedicated to listing contact addresses for individuals and groups interested in UFOs across Denmark. These are categorized by region:

• København and surrounding areas: Includes contacts in Lyngby, Brønshøj, Dragør, Kastrup, Nørrebro (UFO-KREDS), and Copenhagen itself.
• Sjælland and Lolland-Falster: Lists contacts in Birkerød, Hedehusene, Føllenslev, Gadstrup, Hillerød, Hørsholm, Lov, Nykøbing, Næstved, Slagelse, St. Heddinge, St. Merløse, Stubbekøbing, and Vedbæk.
• Jylland: Features contacts in Åbyhøj, Egtved, Fasterholt St., Fredericia, Grenå (two contacts), and Horsens.
• Fyn and the islands: Includes contacts in Kerteminde, Odense, Rørrosehus, and Svendborg.

Each listing typically includes a name, address, and sometimes a telephone number.

Contact Addresses in Norway

Addresses for UFO-related contacts in Norway are also provided, including:

• Alta (Valther Esjeholm)
• UFO-Bergen
• Bodø (Knut Rønning)
• Eidsvold (Knut Aasheim)
• Harstad (Arild Vollan)
• Kristiansund N. (Per Aresvik)
• Lofoten (H. Normann Jensen)
• Oslo (Nils Jacob Jacobsen)
• Porsgrunn (Hans E. Vaaga)
• Salhus (Odd Nilsen)
• Skien (Per Landgraff Holm)
• Stavanger (Robert Moklev)
• Søndre Hødland (Kr. Ydersbond)
• Trondheim (Tronheim UFO-forening)
• Tromsø (Tromsø UFO-forening, with two contacts: Arnold Lockertsen and the organization itself)
• Tønsberg (Arne Foss)

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The issue clearly aims to connect individuals interested in the UFO phenomenon. The inclusion of extensive contact lists suggests a proactive stance in fostering a community and facilitating communication among researchers and enthusiasts. The reporting of pilot sightings in Peru adds a layer of credibility and intrigue to the UFO topic, presenting firsthand accounts of aerial phenomena. The publication date of June 1968 places it within a period of heightened interest in UFOs globally.