UFO Nyt - Juli 1960

Magazine Overview

Title: UFO NYT
Issue: Juli 1960
Publisher: S.U.F.O.I. (Scandinavian UFO-investigation)
Country: Denmark
Price: 1 kr.

This issue of UFO NYT, published in July 1960 by the Scandinavian UFO-investigation (S.U.F.O.I.), aims to foster knowledge and interest in the UFO phenomenon. The magazine presents itself as a platform for various viewpoints on UFO research without necessarily endorsing all opinions expressed within its pages.

Editorial Stance and Mission

The editorial states that S.U.F.O.I. intends to use "UFO-NYT" to advance the understanding of UFO research. It clarifies that the articles published are contributions to this knowledge and that the organization does not necessarily agree with or take responsibility for the opinions presented.

Content Highlights

"Tålmodighed" (Patience)

This section addresses the common question of "Why isn't anything really happening yet?" It encourages patience, stating that the UFO matter is progressing and that efforts are underway to achieve a breakthrough. The author criticizes those who dismiss UFOs, asserting that there is no scientific or political evidence to disprove their existence, while conversely, there is evidence supporting the reality of interplanetary spacecraft. The piece references the late English astronomer Dr. H. P. Wilkins, who once stated that if an astronomer claims no knowledge of "flying saucers," they are either lying or cannot reveal their knowledge.

"Vi nærmer os sandheden" (We Are Approaching the Truth)

This article expresses pleasure that certain circles are now actively discussing life on other planets, noting a shift from previous dismissals. It suggests that official policies are moving towards disclosure. The author points to recent newspaper articles, such as one in "Dagens Nyheder" (June 23, 1960), which discusses the possibility of "unknown celestial bodies sending radio signals to our planet." This is linked to findings by American scientists, including Professor R. N. Bracewell, who reportedly detected a "celestial body" not originating from Earth and hoped to establish contact. The article quotes Bracewell suggesting that highly advanced civilizations in our own solar system might already have established contact, possibly attempting to reach Earth through means beyond our current comprehension. The author contrasts this with the past, where discussing life in our solar system was considered taboo, except among "over-excited individuals" in S.U.F.O.I.

A quote from Leck Fischer is included, describing the human world as cruel and competitive, where people strive to be ahead, fighting rather than living, and turning life into a miserable war against all.

"Kaptajn Peter Killian søges latterliggjort" (Captain Peter Killian is Sought to be Ridiculed)

This section details an incident involving Captain Peter Killian of AA and his crew, who reported observing a UFO formation on February 24, 1959. According to "UFO-OBSERVER," an A.F. (Air Force) spokesperson publicly ridiculed "flying saucer witnesses," categorizing them as individuals who couldn't remember things clearly or were deceived by ordinary objects, or outright liars. This official statement is presented as a direct response to the UFO sighting report and is criticized as a deliberate attempt to discredit the pilots and passengers. The article provides a chronological account of the events, including interviews with Captain Killian and other NICAP members. It describes the sighting from the perspective of Killian and his co-pilot, John Dee, who observed three yellowish lights in a line formation over Pennsylvania at 8,500 feet. The objects were distinct from stars and appeared clearer at times, suggesting movement. Killian informed his 35 passengers, and the lights were observed for about 40 minutes. The report is corroborated by N. D. Puscas, who had a background in aviation. The article notes that other UA (United Airlines) crews also observed UFOs around the same time. After Killian's landing, a Detroit newspaper reported the sighting, and the local AA press officer supported the release of Killian's report. However, when NICAP inquired with AF, they stated they had no explanation but were investigating. The FAA confirmed that their responsibility ended when a UFO report was passed to the military.

"Litteratur" (Literature)

This section reviews books related to UFOs. The first review is of Gray Barker's "They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers" (1952). The review discusses Barker's investigation into UFO researchers who discovered unsettling truths, possibly silenced by authorities or mysterious figures in black suits. It mentions Barker's interest sparked by a report of a "hideous, foul-smelling, possibly self-luminous Sutton giant with green eyes." The review details witness accounts of strange beings, including one with black wings and another in a green suit. It also touches upon the disappearance of witnesses, the arrest of another ufologist, and Barker's own detention for his safety. The book reportedly explores the idea that UFOs have bases on the Moon and are linked to "RELIGION." Bender, a key figure in Barker's research, believed that authorities would reveal the truth within four years. The review notes that Bender was visited by men in black and became silent, but he had shared his findings with others. The book also discusses the possibility of UFOs originating from other dimensions or a secret land, and Bender's belief that the USA already had artificial satellites and possibly a presence on the Moon in 1952.

"Spørgsmål og svar" (Questions and Answers)

This Q&A section addresses several topics:

• Question 33: Does the magazine support psychic matters or mystical channels? Answer: The magazine does not dismiss any research method, including those aimed at developing human abilities, as truth can emerge from unexpected sources. However, it warns against the misuse of cosmic laws due to ignorance and emphasizes the importance of self-knowledge and understanding one's connection to the cosmos.

• Question 34: What is the opinion on messages received through "boards" (Ouija boards) and automatic writing? Answer: The magazine suggests that these methods often stem from a lack of understanding of the self and the All. They can lead to receiving messages reflecting earthly concerns like greed, fear, and conflict. True divine messages, conversely, are described as non-threatening, non-judgmental, and free from personal predictions.

• Question 35: Do space beings materialize and dematerialize? Answer: No, they do not. The magazine argues that if they possessed such abilities, building metal ships would be unnecessary. It posits that UFOs are material, made of flesh and blood, just like humans on Earth.

"UFO - observationer over Skandinavien" (UFO Observations over Scandinavia)

This section provides a statistical overview of UFO reports received by SUFOI. From May 12 to June 12, 1960, 16 reports were received, all from Denmark. The reports are broken down by year: one from 1954, one from August 1959, one from September 1959, one from January 1960, one from March 1960, two from April 1960, and nine from May 1960. The cumulative total of reports received by SUFOI is 1139. The section then details specific reports:

• 1954 report: Two young people saw a jet fighter with a round object circling near it.
• August 16, 1959 report: A man in Hobro saw a luminous object, followed by a second one.
• September 1, 1959 report: Two young men on a motorcycle witnessed a UFO near Stubbekøbing.

A table lists reported UFO observations by date for January, February, March, April, May, and June 1960, with entries marked for Denmark, Norway (*Norge*), and Sweden (§ Sverige).

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue revolve around the ongoing investigation and reporting of UFO phenomena, the perceived efforts by authorities to control or discredit information, and the scientific and public discourse surrounding the possibility of extraterrestrial life and contact. The magazine maintains a stance of open inquiry, encouraging readers to consider evidence and reports, while also cautioning against misinterpretations of phenomena and promoting a critical approach to information, whether from official sources or unconventional channels. The editorial emphasizes patience and the gradual unfolding of truth in the UFO field.

This issue of UFO-NYT, identified by its page number 107, is a Danish publication focused on UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) phenomena. It presents a collection of reported sightings, investigations, and official responses, primarily from the mid-20th century.

Reported UFO Sightings

The magazine details numerous UFO sightings from various locations, predominantly in Denmark, but also touching upon incidents in the USA, Norway, and France. These accounts include:

• Early Sightings: A peculiar greenish-light object was observed hovering and then rapidly disappearing. On January 23rd, a housewife in Hobro reported a strong green-light object appearing in the east and vanishing to the northwest. In late March, an orange-colored object was seen near Høvelte for 20 minutes, exhibiting complex movements before disappearing at high speed. On April 25th, two young people near Nr. Onsøild witnessed a white, round object moving horizontally. On April 30th, a man in Skive saw a round, white object hover motionless for two seconds before vanishing at high speed.
• Fjord and Coastal Sightings: On May 1st, a grey object was observed low over Randers fjord for 10 minutes, moving against the wind. The following night or early morning, a man in Helsingør heard a whining sound and saw a dark, round object with a dull ring ascend rapidly and disappear in about 10 seconds. On May 2nd, two orange-colored objects, described as light-bulb shaped, were seen near Aarhus, hovering for about 6 minutes before disappearing and reappearing lower and further north.
• Ground and Light Observations: On May 6th, a farmer and his companions near Bovrup saw a red light on a hilltop. On May 12th, a schoolgirl near Helsingør observed a dark object moving horizontally eastward. Between May 16th and 20th, a man in Høvelte reported a blindingly bright light, followed by the sighting of a dome-shaped object that disappeared at high speed with a metallic sound.
• Unusual Formations and Behaviors: On May 21st, five people in Helsingør observed a tilted, white "staff-like" object between clouds, which later changed to a hemispherical shape. A sphere then emerged from this shape, appearing like a bright star, and ascended into a cloud. On May 29th, an egg-shaped object was seen moving at high speed from east to west near København. Later that evening, two young people near Rødby fjord saw an orange light descending diagonally.
• BOAC Flight Incident: On June 29th, 1954, the BOAC flight "Centaurus" en route to London was accompanied for 18 minutes by a large, delta-shaped spaceship. Six smaller "saucers" orbited the main craft, disappearing and reappearing. All 11 crew members and 12 passengers witnessed the event. The craft reportedly changed shape from a disk to a triangle to a telephone receiver shape. Captain James Howard estimated its size to be that of an ocean liner.
• Chabeuil Landing Case: A detailed account from Chabeuil, France, on September 28th, 1954, describes a woman, Lucette Lebæuf-Salin, encountering a small, human-like being in a transparent suit. Subsequently, a saucer-shaped craft, about 4 meters in diameter, lifted off the ground and departed at high speed with a whistling sound. Investigations by experts revealed physical traces, including broken corn stalks, scraped trees, flattened hedges, a circular imprint with a hole, and large paw-like prints.

Official Explanations and Criticisms

The magazine critically examines the explanations provided by official bodies, particularly the U.S. Air Force (AF) and its Danish counterpart.

• The "Orion's Belt" Explanation: The AF's official explanation, released on February 28th, claimed that pilot sightings were misidentifications of "Orion's Belt" seen through ragged clouds. This explanation was supported by a report of a crew seeing Orion from a transport plane at 8,500 feet.
• Pilot Rebuttals: Captain Killian, a pilot who reported seeing UFOs, strongly refuted the "Orion's Belt" explanation, stating he knew Orion well and had observed the UFOs simultaneously in a clear sky. He asserted that experienced pilots would not mistake Orion for UFOs and that other experienced crews corroborated his observations.
• NICAP's Analysis: The National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena (NICAP) analyzed the AF's statements, suggesting they aimed to discredit pilot reports, deter future reporting, and reduce support for UFO-related radio programs. NICAP argued that the AF was attempting to block congressional inquiries into UFOs.
• Air Force Motives: The AF's stance was further characterized as an attempt to maintain the "mystique" surrounding UFOs and prevent them from being sensationalized by science-fiction writers. The AF expressed that UFO programs would give the subject undue "dignity" and that their own investigations were costly, with one official stating that a major investigation cost $10,000.

Expert Opinions and Investigations

• Army Expert Suggests Spacecraft: Lt. Col. Lee B. James, an Army weapons expert, suggested that the objects seen by flight crews might originate from outer space, from a civilization far more advanced than ours, possibly due to advanced surface treatments or materials that prevent radar detection.
• Psychological Perspectives: Carl Gustav Jung, an 82-year-old psychologist, had collected information on UFOs since 1947 and believed that people see UFOs due to fear of "saucers" and extraterrestrial beings.
• Ouranos Organization: The organization "Ouranos" was involved in investigating the Chabeuil incident, with engineer R. Arnaud and Pierre Bouvard providing objective analysis of the physical traces found at the landing site.
• Detector Readings: The issue includes reports of detector readings from Roskilde and Langå, Denmark, where detectors registered activity on specific dates and times, though no visual observations were made concurrently.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring themes in this issue are the persistent reporting of unexplained aerial phenomena, the skepticism and resistance from official military and governmental bodies, and the efforts of civilian investigation groups like NICAP to uncover the truth. The editorial stance appears to be critical of official explanations, supportive of witness testimonies, and dedicated to promoting public awareness and investigation into UFOs. The magazine encourages readers to report their own sightings to SUFOI (presumably a Danish UFO reporting organization).

Notable Quotes

• "I know Orion perfectly well when I see it, it was not a brief glance. For 45 minutes, I saw both Orion and the unknown objects repeatedly. The other crews did too." – Captain Killian

• "I am sure that there are people on other planets who have solved the problem of space travel. I sincerely believe their craft come close to this earth." – Captain Killian

FAQ

• What was the Air Force's official explanation for the UFO sightings? The Air Force's official explanation, released on February 28th, was that the flying crews were misled by 'Orion's Belt', which created the illusion of fast-moving objects when seen through ragged clouds.
• What evidence did the Air Force use to support their explanation? The Air Force stated that a crew on an Air Force transport plane flying from Washington to Dayton had seen Orion through ragged clouds at 8,500 feet, guaranteeing the illusion.
• What was Captain Killian's response to the Air Force's explanation? Captain Killian firmly stated that he knew Orion well and had seen both Orion and the unknown objects simultaneously in a clear sky, a fact corroborated by other crew members.
• What are the alleged purposes of the Air Force's 'Orion explanation' and their statements? According to NICAP, the explanation and statements were intended to discredit pilot reports, warn pilots against reporting UFOs, and reduce support for UFO-related radio programs.
• What physical traces were found at the Chabeuil landing site? At the Chabeuil landing site, seven corn stalks were broken, acacias had scrape marks and broken branches, a hedge was flattened, a 3-meter diameter circular trace with a 15cm hole was found, and large paw-like prints with narrow heels were observed.