Magazine Summary

Letters

Magazine Issue American Association for the Advancement of Science 1960s

Ever wanted to host your own late-night paranormal radio show?

Across the Airwaves · Narrative Sim · Windows · $2.95

You’re on the air. Callers bring Mothman, Fresno Nightcrawlers, UFO sightings, reptilian autopsies, and whispers about AATIP and Project Blue Book. Every reply shapes how the night goes.

UFO & UAP Cryptids Paranormal Government Secrets Classified Files High Strangeness Strange Creatures
The night is long. The lines are open →

Summary

Overview

This issue features a series of letters to the editor responding to a previous article by Markowitz on the UFO problem. Contributors like Richard J. Rosa and William T. Powers challenge Markowitz's theoretical arguments, suggesting his conclusions are not supported by UFO reports and that he underestimates the capabilities of advanced civilizations. Other letters discuss the limitations of applying strict physical laws to new phenomena, the importance of documenting UFO sightings, and the potential for extraterrestrial visitors to use 'excursion modules.' The issue also includes a brief note on the preservation of the Buffalo River.

Magazine Overview

This document is a collection of "Letters" to the editor of the journal *Science*, published on December 8, 1967. The letters primarily engage with a previous article by "Markowitz" concerning the UFO problem and the possibility of extraterrestrial control.

Discussion of Markowitz's UFO Article

Several contributors express their views on Markowitz's analysis. Richard J. Rosa finds Markowitz's arguments unconvincing, particularly his reliance on the law of Stefan-Boltzmann and his calculation of required power for interstellar flight. Rosa questions the necessity of 1g acceleration for interstellar vehicles and suggests that Markowitz's arguments are irrelevant to proving that interstellar flight is impossible, only that his specific hypothetical design might not work.

William T. Powers directly challenges Markowitz's methodology, stating that his entire argument rests on theoretical grounds and bears no relationship to UFO reports. Powers criticizes Markowitz for arbitrarily settling on a ship design and then concluding that published reports are not of extraterrestrial spacecraft because his design doesn't explain them. Powers argues that a technically advanced race would possess unimaginable scientific and technological ability, making Markowitz's design sketch seem "ludicrous."

Jacques F. Vallee suggests that Markowitz is deliberately selecting "borderline cases" to cast doubt on UFO sightings, ignoring extensively documented cases. Vallee also points out that Markowitz incorrectly implies that Vallee suggested an "intra-Mercury planet theory" for UFOs.

Philip C. Steffey humorously notes that Markowitz has "closed the door on UFO's and space travel by showing that interstellar vehicles can never have visited Earth because neither he nor any Congressional committee has seen one." Steffey likens this to Newcomb's proof that aircraft couldn't fly.

Isabel R. A. García quotes Isaac Asimov, suggesting that while a scientist might be right about something being probable, they are likely wrong about something being impossible. This sentiment is echoed by Thomas R. P. Gibb, Jr., who doubts extraterrestrial control but notes that if it were true, primitive humans could not disprove it with current physics.

George Cohen objects to Markowitz's equation of "metaphysics" with the idea that "the laws of physics are not valid," calling it misleading in relation to Aristotle.

Other Topics

Beyond the UFO debate, Milton Hildebrand offers a humorous poem and a suggestion regarding social etiquette for smokers, proposing they ask "Do you smoke?" before lighting up.

L. Archer writes about the "Buffalo River Endangered," highlighting efforts to preserve the Buffalo River in Arkansas from dam impoundment by the Corps of Engineers. Archer notes the support for establishing the Buffalo National River and the ongoing pressures for such projects despite growing awareness of economic and ecological losses.

Recurring Themes and Editorial Stance

The recurring theme is the critical examination of scientific claims and the boundaries of current knowledge, particularly concerning the UFO phenomenon. The letters demonstrate a vigorous debate within the scientific community about how to approach unexplained phenomena, with some advocating for open-mindedness and empirical evidence, while others emphasize adherence to established scientific principles and rigorous methodology. The inclusion of the letter on the Buffalo River suggests a broader scope for the journal's "Letters" section, encompassing environmental and conservation issues alongside scientific controversies.

When a respected scientist said something was probable, he was probably right, and if he said that something was impossible, he was probably wrong.

— Isabel R. A. García (quoting Isaac Asimov)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main criticism of Markowitz's UFO analysis?

Critics argue that Markowitz's analysis of the UFO problem rests on theoretical grounds and does not adequately consider the content of actual UFO reports, focusing instead on hypothetical spacecraft designs and their physical limitations.

Do the letter writers believe UFOs are controlled by extraterrestrials?

Most letter writers express skepticism about extraterrestrial control of UFOs, with one stating the probability is not very high, while another suggests that if they were controlled by extraterrestrials, primitive bipeds could not prove the contrary by citing current physics laws.

What is the argument regarding the 'laws of physics' and UFOs?

Some contributors suggest that strict adherence to current laws of physics might be limiting when considering phenomena like UFOs, and that scientists should be open to new evidence rather than dismissing possibilities outright.

What other topics are discussed in the letters?

Besides UFOs, the letters touch upon the scientific method, the importance of publishing 'hard-data' cases, the preservation of the Buffalo River from dam construction, and a humorous observation about smokers and friendship.

In This Issue

People Mentioned

  • Markowitzauthor of article discussed
  • Hynekcited expert
  • Stefan-Boltzmannlaw of physics
  • Saturn Vrocket
  • Columbushistorical figure
  • Richard J. Rosacontributor
  • William T. Powerscontributor
  • Simon Newcombcited scientist
  • Velikovskycited author
  • Isaac Asimovcited author
  • Aristotlephilosopher
  • George Cohencontributor
  • +4 more

Organisations

  • Avco Everett Research Laboratory
  • Dearborn Observatory
  • Northwestern University
  • Tufts University
  • Long Island University
  • University of California, Davis
  • Ozark Society
  • Corps of Engineers
  • National Park Service
  • U.S. House
  • U.S. Senate

Locations

  • Everett, USA
  • Massachusetts, USA
  • Evanston, USA
  • Illinois, USA
  • Forcalquier, France
  • Toulouse, France
  • Mount Stromlo, Australia
  • Loch Raven Dam, USA
  • Socorro, USA
  • Siberia, Russia
  • Mercury, Solar System
  • Medford, USA
  • Santa Monica, USA
  • California, USA
  • +6 more

Topics & Themes

UFOsExtraterrestrial lifePhysicsScientific debateextraterrestrialMarkowitzHynekinterstellar travelscientific methodevidencereportsobservationsletters to the editortobaccoBuffalo Riverdamsconservation